History of Hamilton County, Iowa, Volume I, Part 52

Author: Lee, Jesse W., 1868-; S.J. Clarke Publishing Company
Publication date: 1912
Publisher: Chicago : S. J. Clarke publishing company
Number of Pages: 572


USA > Iowa > Hamilton County > History of Hamilton County, Iowa, Volume I > Part 52


Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).


Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45 | Part 46 | Part 47 | Part 48 | Part 49 | Part 50 | Part 51 | Part 52



441


HISTORY OF HAMILTON COUNTY


surgeon, no discrimination should be made in favor of any particular school or practice of medicine. The deed is dated February 23, 1903, and is recorded in Land Deed Record. No. 39. on page 564, of the records of Hamilton county. Iowa.


Under the above conditions and stipulations, the Northwest Iowa conference accepted the trust, and undertook the operation of the hospital, and it may be said to the credit of those placed in charge, that they labored earnestly and faith- fully to fulfill the trust in its fullest sense. At this time. Jacob Funk was worth about half a million dollars and had no direct heirs. Many believed that he would make the hospital his heir, and it was but natural that the Methodists should look forward in fond anticipation to the day when the Funk fortune would be left in the hands of the conference for the use of the hospital. There is little doubt that Mr. Funk intended to make some provision for the hospital in his will, but just what that provision should be, he had not decided. On November 20, 1903, Jacob Funk died suddenly in his chair at his hotel. Jie left no will, and his entire property was inherited by collateral heirs.


After Mr. Funk's death. the Methodists began to complain that the hospital was not self-sustaining ; that the deed provided for too much "free service" and some good members of the conference went so far as to insinuate that they had been buncoed into accepting a "white elephant," which was a source of constant worry and expense and of no benefit to anyone except those people of Webster City who were unfortunate enough to need a hospital. It now developed that Mr. Funk had made a mistake in his choice of a medium through which to perform a great charitable work, for the Northwest Iowa conference, instead of looking upon the bestowal of the hospital as opportunity to relieve suffering and perform a great work of benevolence, had apparently accepted the gift with the sole view of gaining worldly advantage. So, when it found that its adopted child was without patrimony and brought no worldly profits, it de- liberately deserted it and for more than a year. Mercy hospital was unoccupied. By the provisions of the deed, the buildings and grounds now reverted to the board of directors. Attempts were made to find some other religious or civic society to accept and conduct the hospital in accord with the stipulation of its founder, but the charity clause was in the way. The fear that the hospital would be a source of expense rather than one of profit, caused many a well- meaning organization to hesitate. At last the offer of the hospital was made to the Sisters of Mercy, of St. Joseph's hospital of Dubuque, Iowa, and at last was found an organization that did not gauge its charity by a percent of worldly profit. The offer of the hospital was accepted. and on October 30, 1905, L. A. McMurray, J. L. Kamrar and F. E. Willson as trustees, conveyed the hospital and grounds to St. Joseph's Mercy hospital of Dubuque, Iowa. The Sisters of Mercy at once took charge. Since that time no complaint has been made regard- ing its financial success. Whether or not it pays, in a worldly sense, is a matter of minor importance. A modern hospital is now conducted in accordance with the wishes and specifications of Jacob M. Funk, its founder, and Webster City has a refuge for the sick and afflicted, and all who apply are received without regard to sex, color, nationality, religion or financial condition. Rich and poor, alike, receive the merciful attention of the Good Sisters, whose lives are con- secrated to the acts of mercy, rather than to the accumulation of worldly goods.


CHAPTER XXX


THE SCHOOLS


THE SUPERINTENDENTS-SUPERINTENDENT SKINNER'S REPORT-THE FIRST HIGH SCITOOL-SUPERINTENDENT JOHNSON'S REPORT-THE NEW HIGH SCHOOL BUILD- ING THE FIRST COMMENCEMENT


THIE SUPERINTENDENTS


In 1857-8 the legislature had created the office of superintendent of com- mon schools. The election of this officer took place at the April, 1857. election. A number of persons received a few votes, but C. A. Baum received a majority of all the votes cast and was therefore the first superintendent of schools in the county.


In 1858 Mr. Baum resigned and Rev. T. N. Skinner was appointed to fill the vacancy. The succeeding superintendents were: 1859, E. H. Blair; 1861. John IV. Lee ; 1865. Rev. O. A. Holmes : 1867. W. J. Covil: 1869, Dr. H. N. Curtis : 1871, Rev. J. A. Potter ; 1873. C. A. Howd; 1877, H. H. Johnson; 1881, Geo. F. Richardson: 1887, Wm. Anderson; 1891, J. H. Richard; 1894, A. A. Weaver : 1895, Will F. Cole; 1899, L. N. Gerber; 1906, J. M. Holliday; 1910, E. F. Snow.


SUPERINTENDENT SKINNER'S REPORT


Early in March Superintendent Skinner made a report of the condition of the schools of the county and as this is the first report ever made on the subject, we will give a synopsis of it.


January 7 visited school district No. 2 in Cass ; taught by J. W. Lee ; school- house, a poor log cabin ; school well arranged ; good order maintained and pupils making rapid progress; school worthy of imitation and teacher worthy of com- mendation from all.


January 9 visited school No. 2, Homer ; teacher, W. B. Goodrich ; good house but not finished ; small school.


January 10 visited No. 1, Homer ; E. H. Blair, teacher ; good house; school worthy of imitation.


January 10 visited school. No. 2. Marion; new log house, with J. M. Stover, teacher.


January IT visited No. 1, Marion ; Noah Kunnel, teacher ; house a small log cabin, rented.


January 12 visited No. 1, Hamilton; taught by W. E. Gates: small log house : not well seated.


443


441


HISTORY OF HAMILTON COUNTY


January 14 visited schools in Clear Lake: taught by Thos. Beardsley in new schoolhouse.


January 15 and 16 visited the schools in Webster City ; teachers, Mr. Prichard and Miss Susan Hillock.


Hle then speaks of a number of new districts in which houses will be built and schools taught during the coming year. He gives no report of the number of pupils in the schools, but generally speaks of the school as being small. Com- pared with the present when every four sections of land on an average has a school, the advancement in this depatment seems wonderful.


In 1859 a four-room brick school building was erected in Webster City. . \t the time this was considered one of the best school buildings in lowa.


THE FIRST HIGH SCHOOL


The question of establishing a county high school had been canvassed a great deal from time to time, and received a new impetus when in 1875 Prof. F. O. Baldwin erected a two-story academy building on Bank street between Willson avenue and Des Moines street in Webster City and opened an academy or select school therein. October ist of that year the project of a select school in Web- ster City was encouraged by the citizens and the board of supervisors was pre- vailed upon to submit to a vote of the people a proposition to levy a tax to build a county high school. It was designed that Mr. Baldwin should, if the vote carried, turn over his new building at cost, and the school could be at once put in operation. But though the plan was generally favored in town, the country people opposed it and the vote resulted in 430 for the proposition and 650 against it. The school established by Prof. Baldwin did not prove remunerative and after a trial of two or three years the project was abandoned. The schools of the city had by that time outgrown the capacity of the buildings and the academy building was leased and the higher departments of the city schools were re- moved to it and it continued to be used by the city until after the completion of the new three-story brick building, when it was abandoned as a schoolhouse. It was soon afterwards transformed into a residence property. The building is still standing. It is the frame building just east of the Christian church.


SUPERINTENDENT JOHNSON'S REPORT


In September, 1880, County Superintendent 11. 11. Johnson published the fol- lowing report concerning the schools of the county :


This being census year. I will make and publish a limited report of the progress of our schools in ten years. According to the county superintendent's report for the year beginning October 5. 1869, and ending October 4, 1870, we had in Hamilton county 49 school districts, 2.212 persons between the ages of 5 and 21, 53 schools, 1,675 pupils enrolled, an average attendance of 929, aver- age number of months of school, 6. average compensation of teachers, males. $37.32; females, $28.78.


There were 51 schoolhouses valued at $30,184.45, with apparatus valued at $250.


2161 LONIODORS 7


Drawn from an old print by E. S. Boudinot


THE OLD BRICK SCHOOLHOUSE Built in 1858 and torn down in 1880


445


HISTORY OF HAMILTON COUNTY


Now we have 95 schools ( 16 independent and 79 sub-districts) and 102 schoolhouses, just double the number we had ten years ago. During the year we have had 105 schools with an average of 716 months school. The average compensation of teachers was males, $28.15; females, $25.47 per month. The number of persons of school age, 3,652. Number enrolled, 2,700; total average attendance, 1,601. Our schoolhouses are valued at $47.075.00 with apparatus valued at $924.00.


In 1880 the teachers in the Webster City schools were as follows: Princi- pal. Miss E. H. Hillock; assistant principal. L. J. Pierson; A. grammar, Geo. F. Richardson; B. grammar, Miss Hattie Richardson (now Mrs. Louis Lager ) ; intermediate and primary, Miss Brewster, Miss Baird, Miss Fisher ; outside schools, Miss Ella Snook ( now Mrs. R. I. Burleson ), Miss Cora Call ( now Mrs. F. E. Whitley ), Miss Amy Legg, Miss Eva Pray ( now Mrs. Wesley Frank ).


THE NEW HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING


The project of building a new schoolhouse in Webster City, one that should not only afford ample facilities for the public schools, but be an ornament and an honor to the town as well, had for several years been much talked of, and one or two votes had been taken upon the question. But the people were di- vided in opinion as to what sort of a building should be secured. Some objected to the proposed style, others to the cost. Some thought it too small, others thought it too large, while others yet declared that the old schoolhouse with the ward schools then established with an occasional addition of other cheap houses, made ample provision for the schools and that there was no necessity for the ex- penditure for a large sum of money to build a large schoolhouse. These con- tending opinions struggled together for several years, the latter opinion holding the field in practice until-1880. At that time the schools of Webster City were being conducted in houses as follows: Four rooms in the old brick building, one room in a small frame building. a few feet from the old brick, two rooms in the Baldwin building on Bank street, one room at the west end on Second street. one room in the east end west of the river on Division street, one room on the east side of the river and one room in the south part of town on Seneca street. The schoolhouses except the old brick and the academy buildings, were all small. built after the fashion of country district schoolhouses and with a capacity each of from fifty to seventy-five pupils. The question now presented itself in a little different form. Some of the houses in use must be repaired or rebuilt. The Bald- win academy was only rented and with all, more room was needed to accommo- date the pupils. It became a question then, whether to continue the old plan of building small buildings about town, or of building one large central build- ing that would accommodate all the schools. Public meetings were held and the question discussed, citizens talked over the question on the streets and some gave expression to their views through the local papers and as a result of all this discussion and agitation, public opinion crystalized into tangible form and the question of issuing bonds for $20,000 and building a house to cost that amount, was submitted to a vote on March 16, 1881. The proposition carried by a large majority and the school board entered at once upon the work of secur- ing plans preparing to execute the will of the people upon this question. The


446


HISTORY OF HAMILTON COUNTY


school board at that time consisted of G. B. Pray, president, Col. G. W. Cros- ley, Sumler Willson, 1. W. Packard, E. N. Lee and F. Q. Lee. School buildings in other towns were examined and all the information gained that was possi- ble and the board were mostly of the opinion that a two-story building should be built. But there seemed to be a general demand on the part of the citizens for a three-story building, one that would be imposing in appearance and an ornament to the city. The board therefore yielded to the general wish and about the 30th of April, adopted plans furnished by Architect Foster of Des Moines. Foster had been the architect for the courthouse and his work gave such gen- eral satisfaction that the board were pleased to have him placed in charge of the new school building. The contract was let to D. N. Stearns for $21.900 After the schoolhouse was completed, the contractor was unable to pay all his bills and it was represented to the school board that on account of the advance in cost of labor and material, the building had cost over $3,000 more than the contract price and an effort was made to get the board to pay this extra price. The board had no authority to do this, but they did appoint a committee to in- vestigate the cost of the building and the committee reported its actual cost to be $25.285.90. As a consequence of this investigation, the following proposition was submitted at the March, 1883 school election: "Shall a tax of $2.500 be voted to reimburse Mr. Stearns for his loss in erecting the school building?" The proposed tax failed to carry, the vote being 45 for and 245 against.


While this tax proposition was submitted ostensibly to aid the contractor, the real parties in interest were Nelson and Sladden, local lumber dealers who held a large unpaid account against the contractor, and who had made the mistake of attempting to hold the school district liable for the material sold to the contractor.


THE FIRST COMMENCEMENT


On June 24, 1881, occurred the first annual commencement of the Webster City high school. The exercises were held at the Congregational church. The graduates were Anne J. Parker, Clara M. Willson, Nora F. Thompson and Teressa Willson.


The course of study in the high school at the time of the first commencement was as follows:


First year: Arithmetic, English grammar, U. S. history. civil government, physiology, physical geography.


Second year : Bookkeeping, algebra, natural philosophy, chemistry.


Third year : Algebra, geometry, chemistry, general history, botany.


Fourth year : Geometry, general history, zoology, geology, astronomy. botany. rhetoric.


Elective courses of Latin and German were also provided.


At the time of the first commencement, Elizabeth Hillock was at the head of the schools. When the new schoolhouse was completed Prof. W. H. Dixon was placed in charge, and was retained about six years. In 188; B. F. Barge. a member of the school board, was elected principal but after a month's in- successful attempt to manage the schools, he resigned and Prof. A. A. Weaver succeeded him. Prof. Weaver remained in charge until 1892 when he was succeeded by Prof. E. T. Fitch. Prof. Fitch was succeeded by W. 11. Martin-


-


TUELL


PUBLIC SCHOOL BUILDINGS, WEBSTER CITY


447


HISTORY OF HAMILTON COUNTY


dale and he by Lyman H. Ford. Prof. Ford conducted the schools until 1909, when D. M. Kelly, the present superintendent, was elected. During the thirty- five years of its existence the Webster City high school has graduated nearly six hundred pupils.


Besides the high school at Webster City there are now high schools at Wil- liams, Ellsworth, Jewell and Stratford.


Higher education is also supplied by the Jewell Lutheran college, which was established at Jewell, Iowa, in 1893, and has an enrollment at the present time of about two hundred pupils.


Hamilton county supports one hundred and thirty-three rural schools.


CHAPTER XXXI


AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT


Notwithstanding the fact that agriculture is the oldest of known sciences and has been the main occupation of the people of Hamilton county for over sixty years, it is still, so far as this county is concerned, in its infancy. Until within the last few years, farming has been looked upon as an occupation that required nothing but strength and endurance to perform hard and unceasing manual labor. The man who had these could succeed at farming or perhaps it would be more appropriate to say that he could if he were so disposed ac- cumulate enough to enable him to move to town at the age of forty-five, broken in health and doomed to spend the rest of his days in idleness. The fact that farming was a scientific pursuit that required not only a scientific education, but also a most thorough and complete business education apparently did not occur to many who had made farming the business of their lives. So farming in many cases has been a life of aimless drudgery. The children have been kept out of school to work in the fields until they were old enough to break from parental control and flock to the towns and cities, the boys to seek enervating positions in stores and offices, while the girls found employment in the kitchens of their inferiors.


But happily these conditions have now passed. The farmer of today is a student, whose term of study never ends, an investigator, who ever sees before him, subjects for research and experiment, new, and increasing in num- ber. He may not be a college graduate, but he has the education just the same, and it is no less effective because it was self acquired, and you may depend upon it, his sons and daughters are attending college.


In 1860 there were 139 farms in Hamilton county and of these, only 19 were of more than too acres in extent and more than half the entire number were of less than 50 acres in extent. The farms were small, located along the streams where timber furnished shelter and fuel, while the adjoining prairie furnished abundance of free range for stock.


In 1870 the number of farms had increased to 708 and still only 78 of these were over 100 acres in extent. There were two farms of over 500 acres each. In 1880 there were 1,565 farms nearly half of which were over 100 acres in extent. The farms were now divided mostly into eighties, quarters and half sections and from this time on farms of a quarter section in size predomi- nated. In 1875 there were 64,000 acres of improved farm lands in Hamilton county. In 1880, 120.309; in 1885. 190.925 ; in 1890, 232,315 : in 1895. 240,657 : in 1900, 328.308: in 1905, 326.522. The wet years following 1900 had evi- dently caused some of the improved land to "go back" as it will be noticed that Vol. 1-29


449


450


HISTORY OF HAMILTON COUNTY


the number of acres had decreased in 1905. While there had up to the begin- ning of the twentieth century been steady development in the opening up and improving of new lands, little improvement had been made in the productive qualities of the land that was being farmed. For in 1865 the average production of corn was 39 bushels per acre: in 1867. 23 bushels; in 1875. 32 bushels; in 1880, 40 bushels ; and in 1905. 36 bushels, while in individual cases. as high as So bushels per acre have been frequently raised, the "average" farmer has usually been content with 40 bushels and oftentimes has been compelled to be content with less.


The soil of Hamilton county is so uniform in quality that the wide differ- ence in yields so often found on adjoining farms can only be explained by an in- quiry into the methods of farming employed.


Prior to the beginning of the twentieth century, the development in agri- culture was turned chiefly toward the opening up of new farms and in sup- plying proper buildings for the care of live stock. The land itself had been so rich that methods to increase its productiveness were not considered and so cheap that if the farmer needed more grain, he bought more land. The real develop- ment in agriculture has been forced upon the people when the demand, and consequently the price, increased until the farmer who needed more grain could not buy the quarter adjoining him. He began, of necessity, to look about for means for increasing the yield on the acres he already owned. Rotation of crops, and the use of clover was hailed as a new discovery; though in fact this "new discovery" had been made repeatedly for centuries. But even rotation of crops and the use of clover would not cure a condition that prevented the full use of nearly half the land in the county. There was hardly a prairie farm that did not have nearly half its area damaged by the presence of sloughs and swamps. When the enterprising farmer sought to drain his land, his neighbor in the course of drainage below him objected. He argued. "If you turn the water from your swamp land into my land, you will damage my farm" and the law sustained the objector. This law was based upon a decision of the supreme court made in an early day before the question of drainage had been seriously considered. A man had by means of mole ditches and drains, collected all of the water on his farm into a single channel. This channel passed across the land of his neigh- bor and the volume of water flowing through the channel was so increased by the aforesaid mole ditches and drains that it washed out a part of the founda- tion from under the neighbor's cornerib. The neighbor sued for damages and the supreme court held that the owner of the dominant estate had no right to collect the water on his land and discharge upon the land of his neighbor in a way that either increased its volume or changed the manner in which the water from above naturally flowed to the land below.


For years this law stood directly in the way of drainage and was a most serious stumbling block to the progress of Iowa. Then the legislature passed a law that provided that the owner of land might collect the water on his own land in any manner he saw fit, provided none of it was diverted from the natural course of drainage and the owner of the servient estate should have no claim for damages because the water from above came upon his land in volume or manner different than it came naturally. This law helped a few. but in a level country


-


WEBSTER CITY ON WATERMELON DAY, 1911


451


HISTORY OF HAMILTON COUNTY


where the general fall is not more than one or two feet to the mile, it furnished but little relief.


Then was enacted the drainage law that has done more for Hamilton county than any law ever placed upon the statute books of the state. As amended, it provides that any man who owns agricultural lands that need drainage may peti- tion the board of supervisors for the formation of a drainage district and the board on investigation finds that the land within the proposed district needs drainage and the cost will not be in excess of the benefits that will accrue to the land, it shall establish the district and construct drains which furnish all the land in the proposed district a general outlet. The cost of this improvement is then assessed, or apportioned among the different forty acre tracts within the district in proportion to the benefits received by each tract from the improvement. Under this law, the board of supervisors of Hamilton county has established over one hundred drainage districts, and there has been expended for public drainage improvement, over $1,139,000, and a million more has been expended for private drainage made possible by the public drainage. As a direct result of this expendi- ture of a little over two millions for drainage, the lands of Hamilton county have advanced in value over eighteen million dollars and besides this, the increased production due to the draining out and farming of hitherto worthless swamps, has paid for the cost of the improvements many times over.


Yet. this great project was met throughout with the bitterest opposition. The members of the board who established the districts were vilified and abused in a most shameful manner and the commissioners who spread the assessments, came in for their share of the venom that was thoughtlessly thrown at them. But they all persisted in the course they believed to be right, and which proved to be the most beneficent stroke of public policy ever adopted since the founding of the county.


Let history record on its roll of honor, the names of George S. Neel. John HI. Sparboe. H. A. Stafford, William D. Bonner, Hampton Wilson, N. H. Bawden, men who served on the board of supervisors of Hamilton county during the great drainage era.


Now that the possibility for thorough drainage is secure, the farmer may well turn with hope and confidence to the methods of agriculture that will increase his vield. Without drainage, these methods were practically useless; with thorough drainage, the wonders that can and will be accomplished with Hamilton county soil have never yet been realized.


Only a few years hence, when you meet a farmer. you will find a scientist. who knows his soil and its needs, who knows why his crops grow or why they fail. and how that failure may be averted. You will find him to be a business man, versed not only in books of account, but also in methods of management that leave no room for waste, either of product or energy. You will find him a machinist who builds, repairs and operates the most intricate of farm machinery and moreover, you will find him to be a gentleman who demands and receives his just due, but is too proud to take advantage of the frailties or ignorance of his fellow men. In all well established countries since time began, the land owners have been the aristocrats. Hamilton county is no exception to the rule. But the aristocracy of Hamilton county will not be alone one of wealth but also one of education and refinement.


452


HISTORY OF HAMILTON COUNTY


HORTICULTURE


When the pioneer first settled in Hamilton county he set out his orchard and raised fruit for his own use, and the pioneer will remember that fruit growing was successful. Jacob Paine, Benjamin Millard and Huitt Ross were enthusias- tie fruit men. At one time Huitt Ross originated a new variety of apple of su- perior qualities and named it "The Hamilton Freeman." But the sons of the pioneer have been too busy raising corn and hogs to pay any attention to fruit and the old orchards have died of neglect and have never been replanted and fruit growing has been consigned to those less fortunate communities where they "can't raise anything but fruit." Yet fruit raising in Hamilton county can be made a most profitable business. A crop of strawberries can be raised about as easily as a crop of potatoes and will yield a revenue of from $300 to $500 per acre. Raspberries are prolific bearers if given a little intelligent treatment and the home market has never been half supplied. Plums, cherries, apples, grapes are a sure erop and if given the care and attention that is given them in "fruit countries" will bear abundantly.


With the land worth from $150 to $200 per acre it will be necessary to resort more or less to intensified farming and it requires no great foresight to see that at no distant time. Hamilton county will be the home of many a prosperous fruit farmer. v


. 1


2


٠


AMMAMAA


٠٨٨٨٨


/٨٨٨٨٨


ججم ٩٨٣


nA


المي


٠٠٠


٢٠١٩


٢٠١٠٠١١٩٣٩٩


٠٠


راي محميني !


AP


ـد ال٣ ٠٠٧١ ٠ ٩٨٥١


بوفون


٨٩٣٥٠٠٣ ٣ ١ جيجا


٨ ١


٨٨


مر مر س٨٨ ٨٨٨ ١٣٨٨١٧٩


AM٨٠


A


يوجم


بنيوبس الا بيض اجعة الصبيين بع طائع م


الم بيض اجديدجة بخالىالعائد ٢٠٠٨٩ +وجاء ٣٨جنيه يوجد ٣ ٠١٨٠ مجددا


٨٨٠


مجمع


٠,١٠٠جم +رقم برصاصج ٨


M


مزارعباب بايد بهـ


مصر


٨٠ +حمم بر ٥ ٠


خدمـ


٢٠١٨٠


٠٫٩٠


hA


يهم جرصاجياء ح


٠٩٠


ـميه


ماجد سام


٠ ج


٠٠


M ٠١٨٨


١٩٨٩


س إيرA


٩٨#


امرطارا بوروريد اياه


٨


أسلميام صر


السمطيمدير اى ديم بن حويلية


عباعـ


يمر


: ميه


+اداماك


إباءالمادة باجام بادام اله جاهين


٨٩٨٨٨٩ م سيمو


ـمرايبين:


٨٨- ايهجم


٠ +١٩٩١٥٠ ٥٩٢٦٢٩


الى


W


ـة اجمد٩ ٦٥)


الايام ابدونه جاس ١٠ ج سام ١٨٩


حاب


المادة


خروب


MA


ـبى


حا مؤيط


١٩٩١٩٥


حب بـ


جوز لجاء امدجاجة بهجة بأيام كيميا


ـارخى


أبدى باحة


عماجاء في


جامد نيوجوب


اللي بيب: ٩٨٦٥ ٠٠ ١يجيبه جـ


Ar


بير جمبوبة للس ، بم ٣٥٩


اجمالجب


١٠٠٢٦٠


A


AAAAN PARA F A


بوب و


بالوباء ٥ ٣


٠١٠٠


٠٠


HAT




Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.