History of Dearborn County, Indiana : her people, industries and institutions, Part 4

Author: Archibald Shaw
Publication date: 1915
Publisher:
Number of Pages: 1123


USA > Indiana > Dearborn County > History of Dearborn County, Indiana : her people, industries and institutions > Part 4


Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).


Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45 | Part 46 | Part 47 | Part 48 | Part 49 | Part 50 | Part 51 | Part 52 | Part 53 | Part 54 | Part 55 | Part 56 | Part 57 | Part 58 | Part 59 | Part 60 | Part 61 | Part 62 | Part 63 | Part 64 | Part 65 | Part 66 | Part 67 | Part 68 | Part 69 | Part 70 | Part 71 | Part 72 | Part 73 | Part 74 | Part 75 | Part 76 | Part 77 | Part 78 | Part 79 | Part 80 | Part 81 | Part 82 | Part 83 | Part 84 | Part 85 | Part 86 | Part 87 | Part 88 | Part 89 | Part 90 | Part 91 | Part 92 | Part 93 | Part 94 | Part 95 | Part 96 | Part 97 | Part 98 | Part 99 | Part 100 | Part 101 | Part 102 | Part 103 | Part 104 | Part 105 | Part 106 | Part 107


Digitized by Google


49


DEARBORN COUNTY, INDIANA.


which was cut off from Indiana in the spring of 1809. The one newspaper of the territory waged a losing fight against Jennings, the latter appealing for support on the ground of his anti-slavery views. The result of the election was as follows: Jennings, 428; Randolph, 402; Johnson, 81. Jonathan Jennings may be said to be the first successful politician produced in Indiana. His congressional career began in 1809 and he was elected to Congress four successive terms before 1816. He was president of the constitution conven- vention of 1816, first governor of the state and was elected a second time, but resigned to go to Congress, where he was sent for four more terms by the voters of his district.


EFFORTS TO ESTABLISH SLAVERY IN INDIANA.


The Ordinance of 1787 specifically provided that neither slavery nor any voluntary servitude should ever exist in the Northwest Territory. Notwith- standing this prohibition, slavery actually did exist, not only in the North- west Territory, but in the sixteen years while Indiana was a territory as well. The constitution of Indiana in 1816 expressly forbade slavery and yet the census of 1820 reported one hundred and ninety slaves in Indiana, which was only forty-seven less than there was in 1810. Most of these slaves were held in the southwestern counties of the state, there being one hundred and eighteen in Knox, thirty in Gibson, eleven in Posey, ten in Vanderburgh, and the remainder widely scattered throughout the state. As late as 1817 Frank- lin county- scheduled slaves for taxation, listing them at three dollars each. The tax schedule for 1815 says that the property tax on "horses, town lots, servants of color and free males of color shall be the same as in 1814." Franklin county did not return slaves at the census of 1810 or 1820, but the above extract from the commissioners' record of Franklin county proved con- clusively that slaves were held there. Congress was petitioned on more than one occasion during the territorial period to set aside the prohibition against slavery, but on each occasion refused to assent to the appeal of the slavery advocates. While the constitution convention of 1816 was in session, there was an attempt made to introduce slavery, but it failed to accomplish anything.


THE INDIAN LANDS.


The United States government bought from the Indians all of the land within the present state of Indiana with the exception of a small tract around Vincennes, which was given by the Indians to the inhabitants of the town


Digitized by Google


50


DEARBORN COUNTY, INDIANA.


about the middle of the eighteenth century. The first purchase of land was made in 1795, at which time a triangular strip in the southeastern part of the state was secured by the treaty of Greenville. By the time Indiana was ad- mitted to the Union in 1816, the following tracts had been purchased: Vin- cennes tract, June 7, 1803 ; Vincennes treaty tract, August 18 and 27, 1804; Grouseland tract, August 21, 1805; Harrison's purchase, September 30, 1809; Twelve-mile purchase, September 30, 1809.


No more purchases were made from the Indians until the fall of 1818, at which time a large tract of land in the central part of the state was pur- chased from the Indians. This tract included all of the land north of the Indian boundary lines of 1805 and 1809, and south of the Wabash river with the exception of what was known as the Miami reservation. This treaty, known as St. Mary's, was finally signed on October 6, 1818. and the next Legislature proceeded to divide it into two counties, Wabash and Delaware.


ORGANIZATION OF COUNTIES.


As fast as the population would warrant, new counties were estab -. lished in this New Purchase. Newton county (December 9, 1859) was the last county to be organized in the state. It had been first established by the legislative act of January 29, 1839, but within a year it was found that the population was too sparse to justify its separate existence, so it was attached to Jasper county and it was not until about twenty years later that its population was sufficient to make a separate county of it. Howard county was first organized as Richardville county (May 1, 1844), but its name was changed by the legislative act of December 28, 1846, to Howard. For purposes of reference, a list of the counties, with the dates of their establishment, is here appended. The dates given represent the time the organization became effective, since in many instances it was from a few months to as much as seven years after the act establishing the county was passed before it became effective.


I. Knox . June 20, 1790 8. Warrick .Apr. 1, 1813


2. Clark Feb. 3, 1801 9. Gibson Apr. 1, 1813


3. Dearborn Mch. 7, 1803 IO. Washington . Jan. 17, 1814


4. Harrison Dec. 1, 1808 II. Switzerland .Oct. 1, 1814


5. Jefferson Feb. 1, 1811 12. Posey Nov. 1, 1814


6. Franklin Feb. 1, 1811 13. Perry Nov. 1, 1814


7. Wayne Feb. 1, 181!


14. Jackson . Jan. 1, 1816


Digitized by Google


51


DEARBORN COUNTY, INDIANA.


1


15. Orange


Feb. 1, 1816


54.


Fountain Apr.


1, 1826


16. Sullivan


Jan. 15, 1817


55.


Warren


Mch. 1, 1827


17. Jennings Feb. 1, 1817 56. Delaware .Apr. 1, 1827


18. Pike Feb 1, 1817 57.


Hancock Mch. 1, 1828


19. Daviess Feb. 15. 1817 58.


Carroll


May 1, 1828


20. Dubois Feb. 1, 1818 59.


Cass Apr. 13, 1829


21. Spencer Feb. 1, 1818 60.


Clinton Mch. 1, 1830


22. Vanderburgh . Feb. 1, 1818 61. St. Joseph Apr. 1, 1830


23. Vigo Feb. 15. 1818


62.


Elkhart Apr.


1, 1830


24.


Crawford Mch.


1, 1818


63.


Boone Apr. 1, 1831


25. Lawrence Mch. 1, 1818 64.


Grant Apr. 1, 1832


26. Monroe Apr. 10. 1818 65.


Laporte .Apr. 1, 1832


27 Ripley Apr. 10, 1818


66. Lagrange Apr.


1, 1832


28. Randolph


Aug. 10, 1818


67. Huntington Dec.


2, 1834


29


Owen


.Jan.


1, 1819 68.


Miami Mar. 1, 1834


30. Fayette


Jan. 1, 1819 69.


White


Apr. I, 1834


32.


Scott


Feb.


1, 1820


71. Porter Feb.


I, 1836


34.


Union


Feb.


I, 1821


73. Jay


Mch. 1, 1836


35. Greene


Feb.


5, 1821


74.


Noble Mch.


1, 1836


36.


Bartholomew


Feb. 12, 1821


75.


Fulton .Apr.


1, 1836


37. Parke


Apr. 2, 1821 76. Marshall


. Apr.


1, 1836


38. Morgan


. Feb. 15, 1822 77.


Brown .Apr. 1, 1836


39. Decatur Mch. 4, 1822 78.


Kosciusko . June I. 1837


40. Shelby .Apr.


1, 1822


79.


Lake Feb. 15, 1837


41.


Rush


. Apr.


1, 182.2 80. Steuben May


1, 1837


42. Marion Apr.


1, 1822 81.


DeKalb


May 1, 1837


43. Putnam Apr.


1, 1822


82.


Wells


May 1, 1837


44. Henry June,


1, 1822


83.


Jasper Mch. 15, 1838


45. Montgomery Mch.


1, 1823 84.


Whitley .Apr. 1, 1839


46. Hamilton


Apr.


7, 1823 85 Blackford After pub., 1839


47. Johnson May


5, 1823 86.


Pulaski May 6, 1840


48. Madison July


1, 1823


87. Benton Feb. 18, 1840


49. Vermillion Feb.


1, 1824 88. 89.


Ohio


Mch. 1, 1844


50. Allen


Apr.


1, 1824


Tipton May 1, 1844


51. Hendricks Apr.


1, 1824


90.


Richardville May 1, 1844


52. Clay


.Apr. 1, 1825


91. Starke .Jan. 15, 1850


53.


Tippecanoe Mch.


I, 1826


92. Newton


Dec. 9, 1859


Digitized by


Google


31. Floyd Feb. 2, 1819. 70.


Wabash Mch.


I, 1835


33. Martin Feb.


1, 1820 72. Adams Mch.


I, 1836


52


DEARBORN COUNTY, INDIANA.


The first thirteen counties in the above list were all that were organized when the territory of Indiana petitioned Congress for an enabling act in 1815. They were in the southern part of the state and had a total population of sixty-three thousand eight hundred and ninety-seven. At that time the total state tax was only abo :.. tive thousand dollars, while the assessment of the whole state in 1816 amounted to only six thousand and forty-three dollars and thirty-six cents.


CHANGES IN THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIANA.


The Constitution of 1816 was framed by forty-three delegates who met at Corydon from June 10 to June 29 of that year. It was provided in the Constitution of 1816 that a vote might be taken every twelve years on the question of amending, revising or writing a wholly new instrument of gov- ernment. Although several efforts were made to hold constitution conven- tions between 1816 and 1850, the vote failed each time until 1848. Elections were held in 1823, 1828, 1840 and 1846, but each time there was returned an adverse vote against the calling of a constitutional convention. There were no amendments to the 1816 Constitution, although the revision of 1824, by Benjamin Parke and others was so thorough that it was said that the revision committee had done as much as a constitution convention could have done.


It was not until 1848 that a successful vote on the question of calling a constitution convention was carried. There were many reasons which in- duced the people of the state to favor a convention. Among these may be mentioned the following: The old Constitution provided that all the state officers except the governor and lieutenant-governor should be elected by the Legislature. Many of the county and township officers were appointed by the county commissioners. Again, the old Constitution attempted to handle too many matters of local concern. All divorces from 1816 to 1851 were granted by the Legislature. Special laws were passed which would apply to particular counties and even to particular townships in the county. If Nobles- ville wanted an alley vacated or a street closed, it had to appeal to the Legis. lature for permission to do so. If a man wanted to ferry people across a stream in Posey county, his representative presented a bill to the Legislature asking that the proposed ferryman be given permission to ferry people across the stream. The agitation for free schools attracted the support of the edu- cated people of the state, and most of the newspapers were outspoken in their advocacy of better educational privileges. The desire for better schools. for


Digitized by Google


53


DEARBORN COUNTY, INDIANA.


freer representation in the selection of officials, for less interference by the Legislature in local affairs, led to a desire on the part of the majority of the people of the state for a new Constitution.


The second constitutional convention of Indiana met at Indianapolis, October 7, 1850, and continued in session for four months. The one hun- dred and fifty delegates labored faithfully to give the state a Constitution fully abreast of the times and in accordance with the best ideas of the day. More power was given the people by allowing them to select not only all of the state officials, but also their county officers as well. The convention of 1850 took a decided stand against the negro and proposed a referendum on the question of prohibiting the further emigration of negroes into the state of Indiana. The subsequent vote on this question showed that the people were not disposed to tolerate the colored race. As a matter of fact no negro or mulatto could legally come into Indiana from 1852 until 1881, when the restriction was removed by an amendment of the Constitution. Another important feature of the new Constitution was the provision for free schools. What we now know as a public school supported at the expense of the state, was unknown under the 1816 Constitution. The new Constitution estab- lished a system of free public schools, and subsequent statutory legislation strengthened the constitutional provision so that the state now ranks among the leaders in educational matters throughout the nation. The people of the state had voted on the question of free schools in 1848 and had decided that they should be established, but there was such a strong majority opposed to free schools that nothing was done. Orange county gave only an eight per cent. vote in favor of free schools, while Putnam and Monroe, containing DePauw and Indiana Universities, respectively, voted adversely by large majorities. But, with the backing of the Constitution, the advocates of free schools began to push the fight for their establishment, and as a result of the legislative acts of 1855, 1857 and 1867, the public schools were placed upon a sound basis.


Such in brief were the most important features of the 1852 Constitution. It has remained substantially to this day as it was written sixty-five years ago. It is true there have been some amendments, but the changes of 1878 and 1881 did not alter the Constitution in any important particular. There was no concerted effort toward calling a constitutional convention until the Legislature of 1913 provided for a referendum on the question at the polls, November 4, 1914. Despite the fact that all the political parties had de- clared in favor of a constitutional convention in their platforms, the question


Digitized by Google


54


DEARBORN COUNTY, INDIANA.


was voted down by a large majority. An effort was made to have the ques- tion submitted by the Legislature of 1915, but the Legislature refused to submit the question to the voters of the state.


CAPITALS O. NORTHWEST TERRITORY AND INDIANA.


The present state of Indiana was comprehended within the Northwest Territory from 1787 to 1800, and during that time the capital was located within the present state of Ohio. When the Ordinance of 1787 was put in operation on July 17, 1788, the capital was established at Marietta, the name being chosen by the directors of the Ohio Company on July 2, of the same year. The name Marietta was selected in honor of the French Queen, Marie Antoinette, compounded by curious combination of the first and last syllables of her name.


When Indiana was set off by the act of May 7, 1800, the same act located the capital at Vincennes, where it remained for nearly thirteen years. The old building in which the Territorial Assembly first met in 1805 is still standing in Vincennes. In the spring of 1813 the capital of the territory was removed to Corydon, and it was in that quaint little village that Indiana began its career as a state. It remained there until November, 1824, when Samuel Merrill loaded up all of the state's effects in three large wagons and hauled them overland to the new capital-Indianapolis. Indianapolis had been chosen as the seat of government by a committee of ten men, appointed in 1820 by the Legislature. It was not until 1824, however, that a building was erected in the new capital which would accommodate the state officials and the General Assembly. The first court house in Marion county was built on the site of the present building, and was erected with a view of utilizing it as a state house until a suitable capitol building could be erected. The state continued to use the Marion county court house until 1835, by which time an imposing state house had been erected. This building was in use until 1877, when it was razed to make way for the present beautiful building.


MILITARY HISTORY.


Indiana has had some of its citizens in four wars in which United States has engaged since 1800: The War of 1812, the Mexican War, the Civil War, and the Spanish-American War. One of the most important engage- ments ever fought against the Indians in the United States was that of the battle of Tippecanoe, November 7, 1811. For the two or three years pre-


Digitized by Google


55


DEARBORN COUNTY, INDIANA.


ceding, Tecumseh and his brother, the Prophet, had been getting the Indians ready for an insurrection. Tecumseh made a long trip throughout the west- ern and southern part of the United States for the purpose of getting the Indians all over the country to rise up and drive out the white man. While he was still in the South, Governor Harrison descended upon the Indians at Tippecanoe and dealt them a blow from which they never recovered. The British had been urging the Indians to rise up against the settlers along the frontier, and the repeated depredations of the savages but increased the hos- tility of the United States toward England. General Harrison had about seven hundred fighting men, while the Indians numbered over a thousand. The Americans lost thirty-seven by death on the battlefield, twenty-five mor- tally wounded and one hundred and twenty-six more or less seriously wounded. The savages carried most of their dead away, but it is known that about forty were actually killed in the battle and a proportionately large num- ber wounded. In addition to the men who fought at Tippecanoe, the pio- neers of the territory sent their quota to the front during the War of 1812. Unfortunately, records are not available to show the enlistments by counties.


During the administration of Governor Whitcomb (1846-49) the United States was engaged in a war with Mexico. Indiana contributed five regi- ments to the government during this struggle, and her troops performed with a spirit of singular promptness and patriotism during all the time they were at the front.


No Northern state had a more patriotic governor during the Civil War than Indiana, and had every governor in the North done his duty as conscien- tiously as did Governor Morton that terrible struggle would undoubtedly have been materially shortened. When President Lincoln issued his call on April 15, 1861, for 75,000 volunteers, Indiana was asked to furnish 4,683 men as its quota. A week later there were no less than 12,000 volunteers at Camp Morton at Indianapolis. This loyal uprising was a tribute to the patriotism of the people, and accounts for the fact that Indiana sent more than 200,000 men to the front during the war. Indiana furnished prac- tically seventy-five per cent. of its total population capable of bearing arms. and on this basis Delaware was the only state in the Union which exceeded Indiana. Of the troops sent from Indiana, 7,243 were killed or mortally wounded, and 19,429 died from other causes, making a total death loss of over thirteen per cent. for all the troops furnished.


During the summer of 1863 Indiana was thrown into a frenzy of excite- ment when it was learned that General Morgan had crossed the Ohio with


Digitized by Google


56


DEARBORN COUNTY, INDIANA.


2,000 cavalrymen under his command. Probably Indiana never experienced a more exciting month than July of that year. Morgan entered the state in Harrison county and advanced northward through Corydon to Salem in Washington county. As his men went along they robbed orchards, looted farm houses, stole all tì .. horses which they could find and burned consider- able property. From Salem, Morgan turned with his men to the east, having been deterred from his threatened advance on Indianapolis by the knowledge that the local militia of the state would soon be too strong for him. He hur- ried with his men toward the Ohio line, stopping at Versailles long enough to loot the county treasury. Morgan passed through Dearborn county over into Ohio, near Harrison, and a few days later, Morgan and most of his band were captured.


During the latter part of the war there was considerable opposition to its prosecution on the part of the Democrats of this state. An organization known as the Knights of the Golden Circle at first, and later as the Sons of Liberty, was instrumental in stirring up much trouble throughout the state. Probably historians will never be able to agree as to the degree of their culpability in thwarting the government authorities in the conduct of the war. That they did many overt acts cannot be questioned and that they collected fire arms for traitorous designs cannot be denied. Governor Morton and General Carrington, by a system of close espionage, were able to know at all times just what was transpiring in the councils of these orders. In the cam- paign of 1864 there was an open denunciation through the Republican press of the Sons of Liberty. On October 8 of that year the Republican news- papers carried these startling headlines: "You can rebuke this treason. The traitors intend to bring war to your home. Meet them at the ballot box while Grant and Sherman meet them on the battle-field." A number of the leaders were arrested, convicted in a military court and sentenced to be shot. However, they were later pardoned.


The Spanish-American War of 1898 has been the last one in which troops from Indiana have borne a part. When President Mckinley issued his call for 75,000 volunteers on April 25, 1898, Indiana was called upon to furnish three regiments. War was officially declared April 25, and formally came to an end by the signing of a protocol on August 12 of the same year. The main engagements of importance were the seat battles of Manila and Santiago and the land engagements of El Caney and San Juan Hill. Ac- cording to the treaty of Paris, signed December 12, 1898, Spain relinquished her sovereignty over Cuba, ceded to the United States Porto Rico and her


Digitized by Google


-


57


DEARBORN COUNTY, INDIANA.


other West India Island possessions, as well as the island of Guam in the . Pacific. Spain also transferred her rights in the Philippines for the sum of twenty million dollars paid to her for public work and improvements con- structed by the Spanish government.


POLITICAL HISTORY.


It is not possible to trace in detail the political history of Indiana for the past century and in this connection an attempt is made only to survey briefly the political history of the state. For more than half a century Indiana has been known as a pivotal state in politics. In 1816 there was only one political party and Jennings, Noble, Taylor, Hendricks and all of the politicians of that day were grouped into this one-the Democratic party. Whatever differences in views they might have had were due to local issues and not to any questions of national portent. Questions concerning the improvements of rivers, the building of canals, the removal of court houses and similar questions of state importance only divided the politicians in the early history of Indiana into groups. There was one group known as the White Water faction, another called the Vincennes crowd, and still another designated as the White river delegation. From 1816 until as late as 1832, Indiana was the scene of personal politics, and during the years Adams, Clay and Jackson were candidates for the presidency on the same ticket, men were known politically as Adams men, Clay men or Jackson men. The election returns in the twenties and thirties disclose no tickets labeled Democrat, Whig or Republican, but the words, "Adams," "Clay," or "Jackson."


The question of internal improvements which arose in the Legislature of 1836 was a large contributing factor in the division of the politicians of the state. The Whig party may be dated from 1832, although it was not until four years later that it came into national prominence. The Democrats elected the state officials, including the governor, down to 1831, but in that year the opposition party, later called the Whigs, elected Noah Noble gov- ernor. For the next twelve years the Whigs, with their cry of internal improvements, controlled the state. The Whigs went out of power with Samuel Bigger in 1843, and when they came into power again they appeared under the name of Republicans in 1861. Since the Civil War the two parties have practically divided the leadership between them, there having been seven Republicans and six Democrats elected governor of the state. The following table gives a list of the governors of the Northwest Territory, Indiana Terri-


Digitized by Google


58


DEARBORN COUNTY, INDIANA.


tory and the state of Indiana. The Federalists were in control up to 1800 and Harrison and his followers may be classed as Democratic-Republicans. The politics of the governors of the state are indicated in the table.


GOVERNORS OF INDIANA.


Of the Territory Northwest of the Ohio-


Arthur St. Clair .. . 1787-1800


Of the Territory of Indiana-


John Gibson (acting) . July 4, 1800-1801


William H. Harrison . 1801-1812


Thomas Posey 1812-1816


Of the State of Indiana-


Jonathan Jennings, Dem. . 1816-1822


Ratliff Boon, Dem. .. September 12 to December 5, 1822


William Hendricks, Dem. . 1822-1825


James B. Ray (acting). Dem. Feb. 12 to Dec. 11, 1825


James B. Ray. Dem. . 1825-1831


Noah Noble, Whig


1831-1837


David Wallace, Whig


. 1837-1840


Samuel Bigger, Whig . 1840-1843


James Whitcomb, Dem. . 1843-1848


Paris C. Dunning (acting), Dem. . 1848-1849


Joseph A. Wright, Dem 1849-1857


Ashbel P. Willard, Dem. 1857-1860


Abram A. Hammond (acting), Dem. 1860-1861


Henry S. Lane, Rep. ...... January 14 to January 16, 1861 .


Oliver P. Morton (acting), Rep. . 1861-1865


Oliver P. Morton, Rep. 1865-1867


Conrad Baker (acting). Rep. . 1867-1869


Conrad Baker, Rep. 1869-1873


Thomas A. Hendricks, Dem.


. 1873-1877


James : D. Williams, Dem. 1877-1880


Isaac P. Gray (acting ), Dem. 1880-1881


Albert G. Porter, Rep. 1881-1885


Isaac P. Gray, Dem. . 1885-1889


Digitized by


Google


59


DEARBORN COUNTY, INDIANA.


Alvin P. Hovey, Rep. . 1889-1891


Ira J. Chase (acting), Rep. Nov. 24, 1891, to Jan. 9, 1893


Claude Matthews, Dem. 1893-1897


James A. Mount, Rep. 1897-1901


Winfield T. Durbin, Rep. 1901-1905


J. Frank Hanly, Rep. 1905-1909


Thomas R. Marshall, Dem.


1909-1913


Samuel R. Ralston, 'Dem.


1913-


A GROWTH OF A CENTURY.


Indiana was the first territory created out of the old Northwest Territory and the second state to be formed. It is now on the eve of its one hundredth anniversary, and it becomes the purpose of the historian in this connection to give a brief survey of what these one hundred years have done for the state. There has been no change in territory limits, but the original territory has been subdivided into counties year by year, as the population warranted, until from thirteen counties in 1816 the state grew to ninety-two counties by 1859. From 1816 to 1840 new counties were organized every year with the exception of one year. Starting in with a population of five thousand six hundred and forty-one in 1800, Indiana has increased by leaps and bounds until it now has a population of two million seven hundred thousand eight hundred and sev- enty-six. The appended table is interesting in showing the growth of popu- lation by decades since 1800:




Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.