Early Massachusetts marriages prior to 1800, Part 1

Author: Bailey, Frederic W. (Frederic William), d. 1918, comp
Publication date: 1968
Publisher: Baltimore, Genealogical Pub. Co.
Number of Pages: 199


USA > Massachusetts > Worcester County > Early Massachusetts marriages prior to 1800 > Part 1


Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org.


Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13


Google


This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project to make the world's books discoverable online.


It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover.


Marks, notations and other marginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the publisher to a library and finally to you.


Usage guidelines


Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing this resource, we have taken steps to prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying.


We also ask that you:


+ Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for personal, non-commercial purposes.


+ Refrain from automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help.


+ Maintain attribution The Google "watermark" you see on each file is essential for informing people about this project and helping them find additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it.


+ Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liability can be quite severe.


About Google Book Search


Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web at http://books.google.com/


US 41540 96


ELS 41540.96


EARLY MASSACHUSETTS MARRIAGES, 11


PRIOR TO 1800.


AS FOUND ON THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF


WORCESTER COUNTY.


FIRST BOOK.


EDITED BY FREDERIC W. BAILEY,


ED. "EARLY CONN. MARRIAGES," DESIGNER BAILEY'S PHOTO-ANCESTRAL RECORD, "THE RECORD OF MY ANCESTRY." MEMBER AMERICAN HIST. ASSO., CONN. HIST. SO., NEW HAVEN COLONY HIST. SO., N. Y. GEN. & BIOG, SO., SONS OF THE AMERICAN REV- OLUTION (MASS.), MANAGER BUREAU OF AMERICAN ANCESTRY.


PUBLISHED BY THE


OF


BUREAU


AMERICAN ANCESTRY FOR


Family


.Researches


FREDERIC W. BAILEY. MGR.


P. O. BOX 587. NEW HAVEN, CONN.


. S. 41540.96


HARVARD


COLLEGE


OCT 21 1897


LIBRARY.


: wilil


Copyright 1897, BY FREDERIC W. BAILEY.


NEW HAVEN : PRICE, LEE & ADKINS CO., PRINT, 206-210 MEADOW STREET. 1897.


CONTENTS.


PAGE


PREFACE,


. iv


WORCESTER,


1, 165


MENDON,


13


UXBRIDGE,


18


RUTLAND,


22


DUDLEY,


24


STURBRIDGE,


30


LUNENBURG,


33


BOLTON, .


40


UPTON,


48


HARVARD,


52


LEICESTER,


58


SPENCER,


62


HOLDEN, ·


68


SOUTHBOROUGH,


72


GRAFTON,


75


SHREWSBURY,


78


WESTMINSTER,


84


NORTHBOROUGH,


88


LEOMINSTER, .


90


DOUGLAS, .


91


NEW BRAINTREE,


93


FITCHBURG, .


95


WINCHENDON,


96


TEMPLETON,


96


SUTTON, .


97, 144


LANCASTER,


. 104


HARDWICK,


117


OXFORD,


127


CHARLTON,


136


BROOKFIELD,


150


BARRE, .


158


MILFORD,


159


ATHOL, .


161


NORTHBRIDGE,


163


ROYALSION, .


164


BERLIN, .


164


PAXTON,


. 164


PRINCETON,


. 165


BUREAU OF AMERICAN ANCESTRY, .


184, 185


·


·


EARLY MASSACHUSETTS MARRIAGES.


PREFACE.


The earliest settlements in Massachusetts were along the coast line; and the territory which became the Counties of Essex, Middlesex, Plymouth and Barnstable, all in Eastern Massachusetts, and extending indefinitely westward and inland, plenty large enough for years to meet the needs of a slowly expanding colony. Except the few isolated com- panies that dared to penetrate the forests, press over the hills and beyond the nearest streams, and there trust themselves to the mercies of impulsive and hostile Indian tribes, a large majority of the inhabi- tants were content to reach out gradually by mastering their immediate foes and subduing by degrees the neighboring wilds, all the while keep- ing within easy reach of the sure aid which at any time might even there become necessary.


.


The territory now embraced in Worcester County was occupied here and there long before its organization in 1731. In the steady march of civilization those sturdy ancestors to whom, through warfare or distant journeyings this region had become familiar, had marked out a number of its most fertile spots for settlement that were later so oft left by will to worthy sons and daughters, who there found for themselves perma- nent and happy homes. Such localities may now be known by the ancient townships, dating back even as early as 1653, when Lancaster was organized and named.


But the interesting and impressive feature of our early and colonial life in Massachusetts, here so briefly told, is that prior to any thought of an organized township, the Christian church, fulfilling to the letter the Gospel spirit, "where two or three are gathered together," had already planted and erected its church, around and in which might center the best aims and ambitions of the humblest community. It gathered the isolated and scattered households for miles around together in an assem- bly, holy in its purpose and far reaching in its aim. At home in the wilderness it brought to each lonely fireside comfort, consolation, good cheer. Its all pervading life and light conquered as nothing else could the red savage in his forest den, persuading even him to submit to its precious ordinances. The faithful pastor kept peculiar oversight of all these people from a supreme sense of duty which was not strictly and conscientiously fulfilled if somehow every name was not recorded by him among his baptisms, on his list of membership, or the eligible among those by him joined in the sacred bonds of matrimony.


Now to these old records of the early Church, carefully gathered by the clergy, mutilated as they sometimes are by years of usage, genealo- gists have been greatly indebted. And it seems very strange that town


-


V


PREFACE.


authorities have not seen fit more generally to secure copies of these perishable books and papers, not alone for their better protection, but that the town records might by their aid be made even more complete. Especially evident is this, so well is it known how oft the church records will contain marriages of town people never recorded elsewhere, or the baptism of children whose names at birth never reached the town clerk. It can hardly be said, however, that the Colony or State of Massachu- setts itself has ever been indifferent to the importance of this subject, if we may judge from the number of enactments which its Assembly from time to time has passed. Indeed, fortunate is the man who, seek- ing for his ancestry, is drawn in the search to the old Bay State, since, of all the ancient States, its records as a whole, thanks to an interested people, are the most complete and satisfactory.


For instance we find (and we use as our authority, and to which we are indebted for numerous dates, etc., "Report on the Custody and Condi- tion of the Public Records," by Carroll D. Wright), that as early as Sep- tember 9, 1639, "It was ordered that records be kept of the days of every marriage, birth and death of every person within this jurisdic- tion." Mass. Rec., Vol. I, p. 276. June 14, 1642, another step was taken to secure complete and perfect record, when "clerks of the writs in the several towns were hereafter to record all births and deaths and deliver a return of the same yearly to the recorder of the court belong- ing to the jurisdiction in which they lived. Persons authorized to marry were to return the names of persons married by them, and the date when married, to the recorder of the court nearest their habitation. Such recorders were to faithfully and carefully enroll such births, marriages and deaths as shall thus be committed to their trust." Mass. Rec., Vol. II, p. 15. November 3, 1692. At this time defects in the previous enact- ment were wisely met when "Every justice and minister was ordered to register all marriages solemnized before any of them and make a return quarterly to the clerk of the Sessions of the Peace, to be by him registered." Prov. Laws, Vol. I, p. 61.


In 1693 town clerks were ordered to register births and marriages. In 1695 justices and ministers were ordered to return within three months the names of all persons married by them, to the clerk of the town, he being ordered to register the same. While on December 1, 1716, "Every town clerk was ordered to give in a list of marriages to the clerk of the Sessions of the Peace annually in April, and every clerk of the court was to record the same." Prov. Laws, Vol. II, p. 60.


These several enactments supplementing each other clearly show how well Massachusetts has sought to do its full duty in the preserva- tion of valuable family data, and explains not only how it is that each town possesses so much of this kind, but also why it is that in the various counties of the state the County Clerk or Clerk of Courts, as called, should have in his possession marriage records as herein found.


Worcester County, organized with this law already in force, began to receive from the various towns within its limits such records as both


vi


PREFACE.


justices of the peace and ministers possessed. It did not secure the earlier records, which, of course, had gone to the clerk of the county from which Worcester was taken-Middlesex-nor did the law probably secure complete obedience in every case, as it might had some penalty been attached, but it did result in the preservation in compact form of valuable data of ancestors now so earnestly sought for, and which town clerks themselves might not be able from their records to supply.


The period between 1731 and 1785 is covered by two large books filed away in the office of the Clerk of the Courts. The marriages are entered apparently in the order of their reception from the different towns, and not according to any systematic arrangement. The name of the minister or justice of the peace in many cases is recorded, though we have noted herein only such Rev. as occasionally appears. The puzzling handwriting, together with the fact that no index exists, and no order or arrangement in the books, has made the search therein most difficult, and the searcher has, after a fair trial, given up in despair of any reasonable results therefrom.


The following records have been most carefully copied and compared. In a few cases the names could not be determined, and such are marked with an (?). The first and oldest book is contained in this issue. A copy of the second book is on file for reference in hopes of publication at some future day.


FREDERIC W. BAILEY.


NEW HAVEN, CONN., September 7, 1897.


-


-


1


EARLY MASSACHUSETTS MARRIAGES.


WORCESTER COUNTY.


Incorporated 1731. Taken from Middlesex County.


The County records begin with the following marriages. Where and by whom performed is not stated. It is presumed that most of them occurred in Worcester.


Noah Mason & Kezia Mascroft, Dec. 9, 1736


Thomas Converse & Abigail Fay, Nov. 3, 1737


Stephen Cary & Mercy Frame, June 22, 1739


Ebenezer Fay & Thankful Hide, Sept. 19, 1739


Richard Dresser & Dorothy Marcy, Nov. 12, 1741


Jeremiah Streeter & Eunice Rice, April 28, 1742


Samuel Roger & Captivity Peter,


June 29, 1742


Stephen Davis & Esther Haw, Nov. 9, 1742


Jabez Nichols & Hannah Mirick,


Jan. 4, 1742-3


John Stacy, Jr., & Abigail Allen,


Nov. 1, 1743


Jacob Huntley & Lydia Allen,


April 22, 1744


John Harding & Washts (?) Rice,


Feb. 26, 1744-5


Solomon Pagon & Hannah Chekeys (Indians), July 10, 1745


Benjamid Hide & Dorcas Dyer,


Nov. 21, 1745


Caleb Harding & Hannah Weld,


Dec. 26, 1745


Edward Simpson & Anna Bond,


May 15, 1746


Joseph Perry & Lois Gilburt, Jan. 6, 1746


Thomas Moores & Ruth Nichols,


April 24, 1747


Tilly Rue & Mary Buckminster,


Nov. 2, 1748


Oliver Heyward, Esq., & Anna Hinds,


June 8, 1749


Benjamin Wood & Mehitabell Hamilton,


Sept. 13, 1749


John Bell & Susannah Hinds, Nov. 17, 1749


Oliver Woolcot & Abigail Mills,


Jan. 11, 1749


Thomas Tucker & Hannah Hill,


July 20, 1749


Samuel Leech & Mary Simson,


June 20, 1749


Benjamin Scott & Lydia Johnson,


Sept. 7, 1749


Icchabod Robbins & Zerviah Rice,


Dec. 27, 1749 .


Elijah Bartlett & Bathsheba Gilburt,


Jan. 11, 1749 May 17, 1750


Arthur Tucker & Mary Sabins,


Jeremiah Woodbury & Jerusha Tucker,


March 22, 1750


Samuel Bascom & Sarah Barns,


Sept. 18, 1750


2


MARRIAGES.


Benjamin Jennings & Elizabeth Gilburt, Nov. 8, 1750 William Witt & Abigail Killam, Nov. 29, 1750


Nathaniel Bartlet & Dorothy Harwood, July 5, 1750


Joseph Marsh & Abigail Symons, May 17, 1750


Benjamin Lee & Esther Baker,


June 28, 1750


Beriah Haws & Patience Warner, Thomas Holdin & Ruth Baker, Josiah Bacon & Abigail Holden,


Nov. 15, 1750 March 21, 1750 March 21, 1750 June 5, 1750


Nathan Newton & Experience Stow,


Elnathan Newton & Jemima Joslin,


June 19, 1750


Isaac Newton, Jr., & Sarah Collins,


Aug. 17, 1750


Benjamin Morse & Mary James,


Oct. 26, 1750


Dec. 10, 1750


William Lewis & Mercy Pike, Jonas Woods & Elisabeth Newton,


Dec. 12, 1750


Nathaniel Stacy & Mary Withirbee,


Jan 10, 1750


Timothy Barret & Dinah Witt,


Jan. 24, 1750-51


Nathan Brigham & Martha Gleason,


Feb. 6, 1750-51


Elijah Bellows & Martha Joslin, Feb. 20, 1750-51


Samuel Adams of Grafton & Elizabeth Gould of Sutton, Nov. 1, 1750


James Whipple of Grafton & Lydia Powers of Littleton, Nov. 29, 1750


William Hatfield & Elizabeth Mason,


Nov. 1, 1750


Ralph Wheelock & Experience Denison, Jan. 24, 1750


William Mckinstry & Mary Morse, 31, 1750


Caleb Stacy & Abigail Bond,


June 6, 1751


Samuel Temple & Hannah Gleason, Nov. 13, 1751


Jonathan Farr & Mary Wells,


June 5, 1751


Timothy Newton & Sarah Mirrick, July 5, 1751


Simeon Walker & Judith Goss, Oct. 10, 1751


Seth Lincoln & Lucy Page,


Oct. 10, 1751


John Green & Annah Bradish,


Dec. 7, 1751


Peter Gibbin & Sarah Green,


Dec. 7, 1751


Joseph Powers & Abigail Benjamin, Dec. 25, 1751


John Auger of Framingham & Bethiah Lyscom of Southborough, Feb. 22, 1752


Joseph Trumble, Jr., of Leicester & Susanna Richards of Dudley, April 29, 1752


John Robert & Sarah Abbot, April 1, 1752


3


EARLY MASSACHUSETTS MARRIAGES.


George Page & Priscilla Whitcom, June 4, 1752 Thomas Denny of Leicester & Mrs. Tabitha Cutter of Grafton, June 25, 1752


Andrew Oliphant of Dedham & Mrs. Elisabeth Browning of Rutland, Nov. 22, 1752


John Beal (?) & Sarah Rood, March 30, 1752


Ephraim White & Abigail Upham, Dec. 21, 1752


Daniel Mathews and Huldah Putnam, Feb. 20, 1753


Benjamain Green & Mercy Taft, Oct. 2, 1753


Elias Parmenter & Bethial Tyler, March 22, 1753


Joshua Wood & Rachel Hazeltine, May 9, 1754


Jonathan Jones & Mary Wood,


May 29, 1754


Paul Hazeltine & Mary Rice,


July 25, 1754


Elisha Taft & Experience Taft, July 21, 1754


Jonah Moore of Worcester & Elisabeth Bemis of Spencer, July 10, 1755


William Thomson, Jr., of Leicester & Jane White of New Braintree, Jan. 16, 1755


Obed Abbut- & Elizabeth Edmonds of Brookfield,


April 24, 1755


Joseph Barns & Susanna Cannon, Dec. 8, 1755


Dr. Joel Carpenter of Hardwicke & Mrs. Mary


Ruggles, Dec. 9, 1755


James Dudley & Mehitable Woodbury, both of Concord, Dec. 25, 1755


Jos. Willard of Petersham & Lucretia Ward of Westboro, Feb. 28, 1757


Noah Harris & Phebee Butler, Feb. 22, 1757


Jonathan Gale & Margaret Crawford, March 10, 1757


Silas Whitney & Jane Porson (?), April 25, 1758


Ezra Bemen (?) & Persis (?) Roys (?),


June 1, 1758


Thomas Willard & Elizabeth Davenport, Jan. 10, 1759


Mathew Noble of Westfield & Lydia Eager of Shrews, May 24, 1758


Anthony Clark & Jane Fairfield,


July 31, 1759


Amos Spring & Phebe Porson (?), Oct. 11, 1759


William Goss & Elizabeth Pike, Nov. 8, 1759


David Child & Mehitabell Richardson, Nov. 29, 1759


Edward Newton & Sarah Winch, Feb. 7, 1760


.


4


MARRIAGES.


WORCESTER ..


Worcester was settled in 1674. October 15, 1684, " It was ordered that the plantation at Quansigamond be called Worcester and that the town brand mark be as illustrated in the record." Mass. Rec., Vol. V, p. 460. Incorporated June 14, 1723. A city, February 29, 1848. First (Congregational) Church organized 1716. Friends, 1735. Clergyman mentioned: Rev. Thaddeus Maccarty.


Josiah Holden & Abigail Bond of Watertown, Dec. 17, 1747 Nathaniel Tatman & Mary Rice, Dec. 17, 1747-


Jonathan Eaton & Ruth Gleason, May 12, 1748


John Fisk & Azubah Moore, June 1, 1748


Joshua Child & Mary Hinds of Shrewsbury, June 2, 1748 Elisha Hubburd of Hatfield & Lucy Stearns, June 7, 1748 Solomon Gates & Mary Clark, Nov. 10, 1748


John Mower & Hannah Moore, Nov. 23, 1748


Thomas Cowden & Experience Gray, Nov. 24, 1748 John Osburn, Jr., of Hopkinton & Jane Gray, Nov. 29, 1748 William Little of Lunenburg & Elizabeth Wallis,


Dec. 1, 1748


James Forbush, Jr., & Margaret McFarland, Aug. 24, 1749 Robert Blair of Pelham & Margaret MacClewain,


Matthias Stone & Susannah Chaddick, Aug. 24, 1749


Nov. 16, 1749


John Chaddick & Lydia Gale, Nov. 16, 1749


William Harris of Holden & Patience Gleason,


Jan. 24, 1749-50 Duncan Campbell of Oxford & Elizabeth Stearns, .


Jan. 27, 1749-50


Cornelius Stowell & Livilla Goulding, March 22, 1749-50


Cyrus Rice & Elizabeth Eaton, March 27, 1749-50


Samuel Randal & Ruth Bond of Bolton, Aug. 8, 1750 Asa Flagg & Lois Chaddick, Nov. 1, 1750


William Browning of Rutland & Rebekah McFar- land, Nov. 22, 1750


Moses Bennet & Joanna Gleason, Dec. 19, 1750


Elisha Hedge, Jr., & Deliverance Stearns, Dec. 25, 1750


Henry Potter & Jane Rowlin, April 25, 1751


Joshua Hide of No. 6 & Rebekah Hubbard, May 2, 1751


5


WORCESTER.


Joseph Gleason & Lydia Whitney, May 9, 1751 James Smith of Leicester & Zaviah Hubburd, May 21, 1751


Isaac Stearns & Katherine Crosbey, Nov. 7, 1751


Daniel Biglo & Mary Bond, Nov. 21, 1751


Jno. Bond, Jr., & Silence King, Nov. 21, 1751 Jonas Rice (tertius) & Bathsheba Parmenter, Dec. 3, 1751 Henry Ward & Lydia Mower, Jan. 2, 1752


Samuel Lawrence of Pomfret & Hannah Tatman,


Jan. 2, 1752


Moses Peirce of Weston & Mehitabel Rice, Feb. 10, 1752 Palmer Goulding, Jr., & Abigail Heyward, Feb. 25, 1752


Phinehas Ward & Eunice Cutting, April 22, 1752 David Biglo & Sarah Eaton, May 21, 1752


Phinehas Gleason & Eunice Chaddick, June 23, 1752


Darius Bugbee of Woodstock & Mary Lovell, Jan. 10, 1753 Daniel Walker of Brookfield & Mary Lovell, Nov. 29, 1753 William Biglo of Pequiog & Margaret Gates, Nov. 29, 1753 Daniel Heyward, Jr., & Anna Wait, Nov. 29, 1753


John Waters and Kesia Holton, Dec. 13, 1753


Jabez Paine of Leicester & Elizabeth Hubbard, Feb. 19, 1754 Mathew Blair of Blanford & Jane Alexander, Feb. 21, 1754 Jonathan Moore & Sarah Gates, Feb. 27, 1754


Thaddeus Biglo & Rebeckah Warren, March 28, 1754


Samuel Wheelock of Shrewsbury & Dorcas Perry,


April 16, 1754


Daniel Greenwood, Jr., of Sutton & Jerusha Eaton,


Nov. 14, 1754


James Carlyle & Mary Mahan, Dec. 25, 1754


David Peirce of Waltham & Huldah Harrington,


Solomon Bixby & Easthar Clark,


Jan. 22, 1755


April 3, 1755


Charles Davenport, Jr., & Mary Hart of Leicester,


Isaac Stearns & Elizabeth Roberts,


April 16, 1755


April 30, 1755 Seth Russell of Cambridge and Dinah Harrington,


May 8, 1755


John Curtis, Jr., & Elizabeth Hawood, May 15, 1755


Timothy Green of Leicester & Sarah Cook, June 10, 1755 Samuel Moore & Grace Rice, Aug. 13, 1755


6


MARRIAGES.


David Moore of Leicester & Elenor Rice, Oct. 16, 1755


James Mcpheson & Sarah Calhoone, Feb. 15, 1756


George Tracy & Elizabeth Hull, April 9, 1756


William Ward & Elizabeth Moore, April 15, 1756


Timothy Whiting of Lancaster & Sarah Osgood,


May 10, 1756


Reuben Hamilton of Brookfield & Lucretia Hub- burd, June 8, 1756


John Kelso & Sarah Crawford,


Sept. 30, 1756


James Trowbridge & Mary Killey,


Jan. 10, 1757


Samuel Bridge & Mary Goodwin,


March 1, 1757


Samuel Curtis & Mary Ward,


March 30, 1757


John Green & Mary Osgood,


April 14, 1757


Joseph Hastings & Mary Stearns,


June 13, 1757


John Crawford & Martha Smith,


July 28, 1757


David Cunningham & Elenor Wallis,


Aug. 10, 1757


John Anderson & Elizabeth McCrackin,


Oct. 25, 1757


Joseph Gray & Mary Thomas,


Nov. 17, 1757


David McClellan & Sarah Stevens,


Nov. 28, 1757


Absalom Cutting & Kesia Rice,


Jan. 10, 1758


Elijah Harrington & Azuba Rice,


Feb. 8, 1758


James Ball & Lydia Rice, March 2, 1758


Ignatus Goulding & Elizabeth Goodwin,


March 9, 1758


Matthew Barber & Hannah Mcfarland, March 16, 1758 Jacob Upham of Leicester & Zaviah Smith, March 22, 1758 Jonathan Chaddick & Hannah Saddler,


April 27, 1758


Joshua Johnson & Lydia Brown,


May 28, 1758


Alexander Calhoon of Leicester & Elenor Mcfar-


land,


Dec. 28, 1758


Alexander Graham of Rutland & Martha Forbush,


Jan. 18, 1759


Micah Johnson & Phebe Moore,


May 8, 1754


William Taylor & Lois Whitney, both of Leices- ter, Aug. 24, 1754


James Putnam & Elizabeth Chandler, Sept. 20, 1754


Josiah Berry & Mrs. Jane Wright, Al" Doolittle, March 16, 1756


Robert Earl of Leicester & Hepzebah Johnson,


March 23, 1756


7


WORCESTER.


Abraham Wheeler & Elizabeth Millet of Mendon,


July 13, 1756 Nathaniel Child & Abigail Adams of Sutton, Oct. 23, 1756 William Oak & Abigail Whitney, Oct. 29, 1763


John Chaddick, Jr., & Sarah Johnson, Nov. 8, 1756


William Bouttell of Leominster & Persis Hubburd,


April 27, 1757


Thomas Lee & Sarah Verry, Nov. 24, 1757


Peter Johnson & Abigail Parks, Oct. 12, 1758


Hezekiah Stowell & Hepzibah Rice, Nov. 24, 1758


Jonas Woodward, Jr., & Rachell Holms, Jan. 16, 1759


John Green & Mrs. Azubah Ward, Dec. 26, 1758


Amariah Parks & Elizabeth Holland, both of Sut- ton, Feb. 8, 1759


Samuel Wiswall & Sarah Dyar,


July 18, 1759


David Richardson & Rebeca Nichols, March 27, 1760


Timothy Bigelow & Mrs. Anna Andrews (in New Hampshire), July 7, 1762


John Moore & Esthar Bigelow, Sept. 11, 1760


Edward Newton & Sarah Winch, both of Shrews- bury, Feb. 5, 1760


Jonathan Phillips of Oxford & Sarah Parker, March 6, 1760 Samuel Bemis, Jr., of Spencer & Mrs. Mehitabel Dannell of Sutton, Aug. 11, 1760


Antipas Earl & Mary Stade, both of Leicester, April 9, 1761 Noah Mendall of New Brantree & Mrs. Mary Low of Rutland, Dec. 22, 1762


· John Child, Jr., of Holden & Mary Smith (minor), dau. of Elisha Smith, Jr., Feb. 18, 1762


Jonathan Sawin & Mary Whitney, Feb. 15, 1759


Jonas Hubbard & Mary Stevens, March 7, 1759


Alexander Mills & Mary Millet, March 22, 1759


David Chaddick & Lydia Wait, July 29, 1759 Jonathan Beaman of Shrewsbury & Sarah Seager,


Oct. 3, 1759


Thomas Davenport & Abigail Wilder, Oct. 25, 1759


Jonas Gray of Holden & Susannah Gray, . Nov. 22, 1759 George Walcup of Framingham & Jemima Very, .


Nov. 29, 1759


8


MARRIAGES.


Increase Stearns & Deborah Hull, Jan. 8, 1760


Adam Walker & Rosanna Mcfadden, Jan. 31, 1760


James Hamilton of Rutland & Mary Knox, Feb. 13, 1760 John Young of Pelham & Elisabeth Smith Feb. 21, 1760


James Turner of Pelham & Susannah Thomas,


April 1, 1760


John Elder & Jennet Ross, April 1, 1760


David McClellan & Elizabeth Harrington, May 6, 1760


Samuel Sawin & Mary Wesson of Sudbury, June 19, 1760


Samuel Johnson & Mary Spence, Aug. 14, 1760 Samuel Smith & Margaret Crawford, Nov. 19, 1760


Jacob Sanderson & Elizabeth Child, Dec. 18, 1760


Nathan Patch of Ipswich & Eunice Adams, Dec. 26, 1760


Jonathan Rice & Euice Whipple of Grafton, Jan 14, 1761


Silas Moore & Mary Jennison, Feb. 4, 1761


Ebenezer Millet & Mary Wheeler, April 6, 1761


Jedediah Tucker of Shrewsbury & Elizabeth Lynds, April 16, 1761


Eliot Gray of Pelham & Hannah Barber, June 9, 1761 Samuel Herring of Dedham & Lucy Harthion, June 25, 1761 Peter Proctor of Littleton & Mary Ball, June 25, 1761


James Hamilton & Margaret Mahan, Aug. 20, 1761


Joseph Barber of Westfield & Martha Mcfarland,


Oct. 1, 1761


Jonathan Bullard of Rutland & Mary Barber, Nov. 16, 1761 Isaac Miller of Westboro & Abigail Gleason, Dec. 30, 1761 Thomas Lovil of Sutton & Lydia Moore, Jan. 13, 1762 Daniel Gleason & Patience Stow, Jan. 27, 1762


Solomon Woodward & Priscilla Holms, Feb. 3, 1762


John Woodward & Ruth Smith, April 29, 1762 Samuel Heyden of Marlboro & Mary Harris, June 1, 1762 Andrew Boyd & Molly Gray, June 17, 1762


Nathaniel Tatman & Rachel Adams, Dec. 2, 1762




Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.