Town annual report of Chelmsford 1926, Part 11

Author:
Publication date: 1926
Publisher: Town of Chelmsford
Number of Pages: 182


USA > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Chelmsford > Town annual report of Chelmsford 1926 > Part 11


Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).


Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12


153


REPORT OF SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS


TO THE SCHOOL COMMITTEE AND CITIZENS OF CHELMSFORD:


I am pleased to submit my fourth annual report as Superintendent of Schools, the 53rd in the series of such reports.


I also transmit to you a "Financial Summary" the usual statistical tables and the reports of the other executive and supervisory officers, all of which deserve your thoughtful attention.


PROBLEMS


It is our belief that the parents and citizens of the town should always be kept well informed of any special problems confronting their school officials. Therefore we hope to call to their attention cer- tain problems that are facing them, as parents and taxpayers, as well as you, their representatives of the School Department.


The transportation problem is one that has required much study by the Committee the past fall. The total number of pupils transport- ed has increased from 310 in the fall of 1923, to 44) pupils in the fall of 1926, or an increase of 41.9%. Our facilities are two, large town owned busses and two smaller busses, privately contracted for. the same as we had in 1923. We feel we have reached just about the limit of our ability to transport any more pupils. This fall on several trips the busses were crowded and when this condition is reached, the Com- mittee does not wish to be held responsible for the safety of the child- ren. This crowded condition was finally overcome by assigning cer- tain pupils to a different bus or to a different building, but the limit of re-adjustment in this manner, with our steadily increasing enroll-


ient is just about reached. It seems the committee must accept one of three alternatives; reduce the amount of transportation by the adoption of a rule, that no pupil shall be transported unless he or she lives a mile and a quarter or a mile and a half from the school to which he is assigned; increase our transportation facilit es by the purchase of an additional bus; or recommend the building of a new school house, so located as to relieve greatly the amount of transpor- tation required of our present facilities.


The State Law does not require the transportation of school children unless they live more than two miles from the school to which they are assigned, however, the policy of the School Committee of Chelmsford for many years has been to transport any pupils living more than one mile from their school. Because of this policy in effect for so many years, it is our belief that many parents would object seriously to the requirement that their children should walk for greater distances than one mile, even though the Committee is not required by State Law to furnish transportation unless they live more than two miles from their school. On the other hand, no doubt


154


many citizens would object to the increase of our means for transpor- tation by the purchase of an additional bus. Your superintendent is inclined to believe the wisest solution to the problem, probably would be the erection of at least an eight room building on one of the cross-roads, approximately half way between the Groton and Dun- stable Roads. We are now transporting from those sections to the Princeton and Quessey Schools, 157 pupils, enough already to require five class rooms. Such a building, modern in every respect, with adequate playgrounds and properly equipped to fulfill the needs as your Committee sets them, would relieve greatly our present transportation problem and provide for future growth in the school population of those sections for several years to come. Moreover this building would relieve entirely the present congested conditions in both the Princeton Street and the Highland Avenue Schools, and the necessity for the provision of more class rooms at North Chelmsford is impera. tive even at the present time. Furthermore it will not be but a few years before we shall have to make additions to both the Westlands and East Chelmsford Schools to provide more class rooms, or assign grades seven and eight of those schools, to the new Centre Grade School, so rapid is the growth of the school population in the above sections.


This problem of future additions to our present school plant raises at once, the question of the desirability of the organization of Junior High Schools in Chelmsford. In almost every community in Massach- setts where new buildings are being constructed, the 6-3-3 plan, i. e., 6 years of Elementary School, 3 years of Junior High School and 3 years of Senior High School, is being followed. The following data with respect to the above question is particularly pertinent to the average citizen who is called upon to support expenditures for new buildings:


1. 24 of the 39 cities of Massachusetts maintain Junior High Schools. Of the 95,000 pupils of grades 7, 8 and 9, in these. cities, 65,000 are enrolled in Junior High Schools.


2. Of the 79 towns with a population of over 5.000 in Massachu- setts. 39 have Junior High Schools. Of the total of 30,752 pupils in grades 7, 8 and 9 in these towns, 15,000 are enrolled in Junior High Schools.


3. Of the total of 118 towns and cities of over 5,000 in Massachu- setts, 643 have Junior High Schools. Of a total of 125,752 pupils in grades 7, 8 and 9 in these towns and cities, 80,000 are enrolled in Junior High Schools.


4. During the past five years, Massachusetts has expended over $40,000,000 for school buildings. Over half, in fact, 51% of this expend- iture has been for buildings erected to provide for the Junior High School form of organization. The above is conclusive evidence that the people of the Commonwealth have definitely committed themselves to the Junior High School Idea.


5. The North Central Association comprising 19 states, showed the following situation in 1925 for 233 school systems reporting: 550% were organized on the 6-3-3 basis; 34% were organized on the 6-6 basis; 1.7% were organized on a 6-2-4 basis and only 9% retained the 8-4 plan of organization," which we still have in Chelmsford. This indicates that the re-organization of the school work in the upper grades is not only taking place rapidly in Massachusetts, but the movement is Country Wide. The above data was gleaned from a report by Frank W. Wright, State Director of Elementary and Secondary Education.


155


Another need deserving the careful consideration of all is a thoroughly trained Director of Physical Education who could do much through preventive and remedial work, toward the development of strong, healthful bodies of our boys and girls. Most of our teachers, our nurse and school physicians, are doing very valuable work to im- prove the posture, alertness and healthful demeanor of our pupils, though the Committee feel that much more might be accomplished if we had a trained physical director. You have this year provided in the Budget for the employment of such a director. Besides supervising the physical exercises taught the pupils by our teachers, he would have complete control of the development of all athletic teams for all the grade schools, as well as for the high school. We hope every citizen will support the Committee in this desire.


Another desire of the Committee is to see a High School Band de- veloped and you have also provided in the Budget for the employment of a Band Instructor, beginning next September.


One educational aim to which we have as yet given almost no atten- tion in Chelmsford is that of some pre-vocational guidance for our boys and girls. To our mind, of the seven educational aims recognized to- day, next to 'Health" and the teaching of . the "Fundamentals, i. e., the 3 R's: Reading, Riting and Rithmetic," the most important is Pre- vocational Guidance. In my report of December 1923 I discussed the topic of Vocations rather fully and would suggest that it merits your reading again.


The home and school programs should include a combination of play, handwork, co-operative activity, and academic work, the whole being varied enough to represent life's demands, and concrete enough to secure an effective response and successful accomplishment by each individual child. True, in a few of our schools we do have sewing, food, agricultural and poultry clubs, organized through the co-operation of the Middlesex County Extension Service and I believe these clubs are very helpful and of much educational value to the few pupils, sufficient- ly interested to join them. Besides, I believe we are offering a real efficient business or commercial course in our high school. However for all children before the school leaving age there should be provided a wide variety of try-out experiences in academic and aesthetic work, gardening, simple processess with tools and machines, elementary con- mercial experiences, and co-operative pupil activities. Such try-out experiences are for the purpose of teaching efficiency in everyday tasks, broadening the social and occupational outlook of the children, and dis- covering to them, their parents and teachers, their interests and abil- ities.


Drifting through school is a common evil in all educational sys- tems. The life-career motive, whether temporary or permanent, should be encouraged as one of the motives in the choice of a curri- culum and of certain elective subjects within a curriculum. To help adapt the schools to the needs of the pupils and the community, and to make sure that each child obtains the equality of opportunity that is due him, it is our duty to establish courses of study that will har- moniously combine the practical with the cultural subjects.


WORK OF THE YEAR


Standard Achievment tests were again given last May in the fund- amental subjects and in almost all subjects and grades better scores were made than in the past four years. For the most part our teachers


156


are teaching much more effectively, diagnosing individual difficulties by testing, giving remedial drill at the proper time and to whom neces- sary, better than ever before.


You will remember that a year ago, in fact on December 10, 1925, our grades 5, 6 and 7 competed in a state-wide arithmetic contest in co-operation with the School of Education of Boston University. Below I am giving you a report on this contest, a study of which will show you that the scores for Chelmsford compare very closely to the median scores made by the 98 towns and cities that competed in the contest.


REPORT ON MASSACHUSETTS STATE WIDE ARITHMETIC CONTEST OF DEC. 10, 1925


Below are summary tables showing the comparative data for grades 5, 6, and 7 respectively for cities and towns completing the contest. The ten columns show, under each of the four fundamental processes and fractions, the average score (left hand column under process) and % of pupils of the grade making a perfect score (right hand column under process). For example, line 1 under Grade 5 shows that the fifth grade pupils of Chelmsford secured an average of 45.2 in addition (perfect score is 50, for each process), and that 40.6% of the pupils of the grade made a perfect score in addition; etc.


Also there is shown for each grade under each process on the two items on the table, 1, the high grade score; 2, the third quartile: 3, the median score; 4, the first quartile, and 5, the low score, for all cities making returns. This makes easy comparison.


No. Pupils Addition Subtraction Multiplication Division Fraction


Av.


%


Av.


Av.


%


Av.


%


Av.


GRADE 5


Chelmsford


98


45.2


40.6


41.2


23.9


36.2


9.3


31.4


10.4


7.5


0


High


49.4


88.8


48.8


72.2


45.2


44.3


43.6


77.7


35.4


9


Q3


47.3


63.1


44.7


42.6


37.6


22.5


37.9


20.0


17.7


0


Median


46.2


54.6


43.3


34.9


35.


15.


35.3


14.8


11.1


0


Q1


44.9


42.8


41.2


23.9


32.


7.6


32.


7.3


8.1


0


LOW


34.


20.


29.6


5.1


19.5


0.


21.2


0.


0.


0


GRADE 6


Chelmsford 112


47.


58.1


45.7


39.2


34.5


0.


38.5


18.7


20.7


1.3


High


50.


100.


49.


81.8


47.3


54.2


47.6


80.


46.


33.3


Q3


48.2


72.4


47.1


55.5


41.2


27.2


42.4


38.4


36.8


9.3


Median


47.8


66.6


45.7


47.1


38.3


21.1


40.7


30.2


31.5


9.5


Q1


46.9


57.1


44.6


39.5


34.7


13.


37.8


22.2


26.9


1.7


LOW


39.5


29.8


33.


10.3


29.4


0


28.5


0.


10.6


0.


GRADE 7


Chelmsford


95


47.1


75.


46.9


49.


41.5


31.


41.3


35.


29 ..


2.


High


49.5


92.


50.


100.


49.1


64.4


48.9


82.8


45.


42.2


Median


48.


72.


46.


54.5


40.7


26.3


43.3


40.


34.9


8.6


Low


43.9


42.8


35.1


14.2


32.


34.2


0.


7.5


0.


Q3


48.4


76.4


47.7


62.5


42.7


0. 32.8


44.6


48.7


39.3


13.4


Q1


47.2


64.8


45.6


44.6


39.1


19.1


41.


32.2


29.6


4.7


157


By median score for a grade in any subject, we mean, that there were just as many pupils who scored below the median score as there were other pupils who scored above the median. To afford comparison, another similar contest was held the last of this December. This con- test included all New England but we have not received the results of this test.


TEACHERS


By resignation last spring and summer we lost only two teachers, both of whom had given faithful and efficient service. Miss Jane E. McEnaney was elected to take the place of Miss Norah C. Mahoney, resigned to be married. and Miss Estelle M. Buckley was elected to take the place of Miss Mary K. Daley, resigned to teach in Lowell, Miss Katie D. Greenleaf, who had. given excellent service as principal of the East School for two years, was transferred at her own request to take charge of the two grade room at the Center School and Mr. Louis O. Forrest, was elected to the principalship of the East School. These new teachers are giving excellent satisfaction and our other teachers are serving faithfully and efficiently as previously.


ATTENDANCE


The percent of attendance, 94.85 for all schools last year is the best record made in the past 12 years and is an exceedingly important factor providing, to say the least, the opportunity for the best of results from the school work. Last year we had a total of only 750 tardy marks whereas the previous year the total was 1163, in fact, this was the best record with respect to tardiness for the past six years. Both these records are plainly indicative that a majority of our teachers, with the splendid co-operation of parents and the pupils themselves, are suceeding in training our children in those very important habits of regularity and punctuality in school attendance. Of course these splen- did records may also be due somewhat to the better supervision of the health of our pupils, or on the average better weather conditions for the year.


HEALTH SUPERVISION


Study of the "Health Supervision-Summary" when compared with that of the previous year shows excellent results from the medical ex- amination. The total number of defects found this fall was 1248, whereas the previous fall, 1203 cases were found. Altho the number of defects was greater this fall than a year ago this slight increase might easily explained as due to a large number of defects found in those children entering our schools for the first time or due possibly to a more thorough examination on the part of our school physicians. The number of cases treated since last examination or 922 was a little less than the number treated the previous year, when the number was 982. However, it is perfectly clear that parents are giving attention to the reports of the results of the examination and the excellent "follow-up" of the school nurse.


In closing, I wish to assure the Committee that I appreciate ex- ceeedingly your advice and loyal support, and the splendid co-operation of the parents, teachers, pupils and Parent-Teachers' Associations.


Respectfully submitted,


C. H. WALKER.


January 21, 1927.


158


FINANCIAL SUMMARY


Payments 1926 Amounts Totals


Grand


General Control-


Expenses School Committee:


Expenses Attendance Officers


Expenses School Census


.$ 798.13 $


798.13 $


Expenses Graduations


Expenses Travel


Expenses Supt.'s Office


Expenses All Other


Salary Superintendent


3,199.92


3,199.92


$ 3,998.05


Instruction-


Teachers' Salaries :


High


$14,251.40


Elementary


43,096.13


Supervisors


2,893.44


Evening School


96.00


$60,336.97


Books and Supplies:


High


$ 1,510.52


Elementary


2,566.93


4,077.45


Operation and Maintenance-


Jan.tor Service:


High


$ 1,709.94


Elementary


5,650.00


Janitor Supplies :


High


$ 336.85


Elementary


149.24


Water, Light and Power


$ 1,050.74. $ 1,050.74


Repairs and Expenses:


High


1,103.39


Elementary


2,894.33


3,997.72


Fuel:


1,637.76


Elementary


4,044.98


5,682.74


$18,577.23


159


$64,414.42


$ 7,359.94


$ 486.09


High


Totals


Auxiliary Agencies-


Transportation :


High


4,285.59


Elementary


4,276.64


8,562.23


Salary School Nurse


$ 1,500.00


1,500.00


Supplies School Nurse


75.88


75.88


Salaries School Physicians


600.00


600.00


Outlays-


New Equipment


$ 1,496.46


1,496.46


Heating Plans & Specifications


350.00


350.00


Heating Units for North & West.


12.428.00


12,428.00


Sanitary Plans & Specifications West ..


26.50


26.50


Plans for Athletic Field


100.00


100.00


New Ctr. Grade School


48,211.12


48,211.12.


$62,612.08


Other Payments-


Insurance


465.50


465.50


Vocational School, Lowell


3,270.70


3,270.70


$ 3,736.20


Total Payments


$164,076.09


* Paid by Special Committee.


** Paid by Special Building Committee.


* Paid by Selectmen.


RECEIPTS 1926


Appropriation, Feb. 1926 $100,300.00


Refunds, during 1926, (Vocational School) 201.95


1,269.49


Reimbursement from State, for Tuition Paid Vocational School


1,240.52


Reimbursement on Account of Teachers' Salaries, from State Reimbursement on Account of Tuition of State Wards.


949.28


Received from all other Tuition


253.86


Special Appropriation for Heating, Plans & Specifications:


Special Appropriation for Heating Princeton St. & Quessey Schools


350.00


Special Appropriation for Heating Units, Princeton & Quessey Schools 12,500.00


Special Appropriation for Sanitary Plans & Specifications, Quessey School


100.00


Special Appropriation for Plans for Athletic Field 100.00


Special Appropriation for Grading at New Centre School. 4,825.00


Transfer from Reserve Fund of Finance Committee


214.42


Total Receipts $130,944.52


160


$10.738.11


*


Received from Dog Tax


8,640.00


SUMMARY DECEMBER 31, 1926


Appropriation, not including any other receipts.


$100.300.00 Payments on account of current expenses of the schools 99,224.27


Unexpended Balance $ 1,075.73 Total payments for schools, not including those from Special Appropriations, or for Insurance & Vocational School. 99,224.27


Total Reimbursements, including Dog Tax and "other tuition," but not including reimbursement or refund from Vocational School


11,112.63


Net payments for schools, from local taxation


$ 88,111.64


SCHOOL BUDGET FOR 1927


Appropriations for 1926


Payments for 1926


Proposed for 1927


General Control


$ 4,000.00


$ 3,998.05


$ 4,300.00


Instruction


64,200.00


64,414.42


69,000.00


Operation & Maintenance


18,900.00


18,577.23


18,900.00


Auxiliary Agencies


11,700.00


10,738.11


11,200.00


Outlays


1,500.00


1,496.46


1,500.00


$100,300.00


$ 99,224.27


$104,900.00


A few individual items in the above tables will be found to differ from those of the Town Accountant's report, because of the fact that the State Board of Education requires different classification of ex- penditures than the Bureau of Statistics.


INVENTORY OF SCHOOL PROPERTY


Buildings .$ 65,000.00


Land


High School


New Center Grade School


143,000.00


5,000.00


Princeton St. (New)


30,000.00


3,000.00


33,000.00


Princeton St. (Old)


7,000.00


7,000.00


Highland Ave.


30,000.00


1,000.00


31,000.00


Quessey


30,000.00


350.00


30,350.00


South


15,000.00


200.00


15,200.00


South Row


4,000.00


150.00


4,150.00


East


45,000.00


300.00


45,300.00


Westlands


30,000.00


1,800.00


31,800.00


$399,000.00


$ 14,800.00


$413,800.00


$ 3,000.00


Total $ 68,000.00 148,000.00


161


SCHOOL STATISTICS-1925-26 Attendance


School


Number of


Day in Session


Boys


Girls


Average Daily


Membership


Average Daily


Attendance


Attendance


Per cent


Tardiness


High


182


79


123


185.75


178.75 96.23


74


Center Grade 1


176


23


14


31.68


29.69


93.71


19


Center Grade 2


176


18


18


32.12


30.61


95.29


15


Center Grade 3


176


14


8


22.04


21.02


95.


13


Center Grade 4


176


16


16


30.25


29.39


97.15


7


Center Grade 5


176


22


19


38.


35.76


94.11


6


Center Grade 6


176


23


29


45.28


43.31


95.65


4


Center Grade 7


176


19


18


32.13


31.02


96.23


4


Center Grade 8


176


17


21


36.08


34.64


96.


5


Westlands Grades 1 & 2


176.5


21


18


38.86


36.05


92.76


12


Westlands Grades 3 & 4


176.5


18


19


34.73


33.11


95.33


6


Westlands Grades 5 & 6


176.5


11


22


32.10


30.95


96.41


7


Westlands Grades 7 & 8


176.5


7


10


14.12


13.53


95.82


7


East Grades 1 & 2


176.5


18


18


35.70


31.63


88.60


38


East Grades 3 & 4


176.5


11


10


22.32


20.71


92.78


18


East Grades 5 & 6


176.5


23


8


31.17


28.93


96.02


24


East Grades 7 & 8


176.5


12


12


23.75


22.07


92.92


12


South Grades 1, 2 & 3


176.5


11


11


18.09


17.29


95.56


4


South Grades 4, 5 & 6


176.5


19


10


24.99


23.91


95.60


28


South Row Grades 1, 2, 3, 4


176.5


10


8


17.96


16.90


94.


41


Princeton Street Grade 1


176.5


17


21


35.63


31.77


89.16


22


Princeton Street Grade 2


176.5


24


22


41.08


38.


91.85


17


Princeton Street Grade 3


176.5


19


22


35.73


33.72


94.35


12


Princeton Street Grade 4


176.5


17


14


30.82


29.22


94.81


85


Princeton Street Grade 5


176.5


17


21


30.77


29.43


95.62


13


Princeton Street


Grade


6


176.5


20


21


37.51


35.87


95.63


31


Princeton Street Grade 7


176.5


22


13


35.06


33.92


96.75


41


Princeton Street Grade


8


176.5


14


18


30.30


29.61


97.72


23


Highland Ave. Grades 1 & 2


176.5


17


27


31.83


29.73


93.51


28


Highland Ave. Grades 2 & 3


176.5


12


21


29.37


28.


94.31


30


Highland Ave. Grades 4 & 5


176.5


18


18


39.38


37.74


95.85


37


Highland Ave. Grades 6 & 7


176.5


12


19


36.79


35.75


97.16


6


Quessy Grades 1 & 2


176.5


20


9


35.52


32.78


92.49


6


Quessy Grades 3 & 4


176.5


23


20


38.04


36.41


95.20


13


Quessy Grades 5 & 6


176.5


8


15


27.70


26.10


94.20


26


Quessy Grades 7 & 8


176.5


17


7


25.79


24.80


95.88


16


Total or Average


176.


669


695


1288.14 1222.12


94.85


750


162


CHELMSFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLS Enrollment, October 1, 1926 .


Grades:


1


2


3


4


10


6


7


S


9


10


11


12


Ttls.


High


79


57


46 32


216


Center


38


29


30


26


35


43


56


30


. .


..


. .


.


287


Princeton


39


36


40


37


32


30


32


33


...


·


279


Highland


(14


20) (18


21) (13


23) (17


19)


..


.


145


Quessy


(24


17) (18


19) (17


10) (20


11)


..


..


. .


..


. .


. .


. .


..


. .


.


. .


·


168 157 157 141


136


136


146


125


79


57


46


32


1382


. .


. .


COMPARATIVE TABLE FOR SIX YEARS


1920-21 1921-22


1922-23 1923-24 1924-25


1925-26


No. pupils enrolled


1210


1153


1214


1326


1386


1364


Av. Membership


1084.78


1116


1119.67


1221.69


1337.42


1288.44


Av. Daily Attendance


991.05


1047


1038.75


1156.67


1262.65


1222.12


Percent of Attendance


91.06


93.82


92.77


94.68


94.50


94.85


No. in High School


160


184


203


210


221


202


No. of Tardinesses


1553


1007


788


938


1163


750


High School, cost per pupil in Av. Membership


$ 152.75 $ 127.67 $ 141.09 $ 137.92 $ 135.71 $ 129.36


Elementary school, cost per


pupil in Av. Membership ..


65.36


56.64


62.67


66.73


59.64


59.52


Cost of transportation


10513.18


8464.05


8968.94 7895.58


8371.10


8279.49


Per mile, per pupil per day, fiscal year


.285


.22


.195


.306


For private owned busses .


.18


.10


.097


.107


For town owned busses


.15


.14


.117


.11


..


..


. .


122


Westlands


(14


24) (15


18) 1(14


15) ( 5 15) (16


17)


East


(22


20) (22


15) (15


2) 10


41


South


(13


7) ( 9


5


3


16


South Row


4


. .


. .


-


.


136


140


15)


2 P. G.


163


AGE AND GRADE DISTRIBUTION TABLE-APRIL 1, 1926


Totals


No. Normal


% Normal


No. Over


% Over


Age


Age


Age


ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS


Ages, Under


6


6


7


8


9


10


11


12


13


14


15


16 17


18


19


167


151


90.4


11


6.5


5


3.1


Grade


1


CT


107


44


10


1


·


. .


.


13.3


2


1.3


Grade


2


.


2


96


39


17


2


2


. .


.


.


.


..


.


131


105


80.1


25


19.1


1


.8


Grade


3


.


. .


1


79


26


14


8


3


. .


. .


1


1


1


. .


. .


·


Grade


4


6.4


Grade


5


·


..


.


9


60


37


18


12


5


· .


. .


. .


·


176


100


56.8


50


28.4


26


14.8


Grade


6


..


. .


.


. .


1


25


62


38


24


18


7


1


. .


. .


.


126


31


64.3


27


21.4


18


14.3


Grade 7


94


77


81.9


12


12.7


5


5.4


Grade


8


5 109


141


130 125 144 146


111


78


27


4


.


·


1139


860


75.7


211


18.3


68


6.


Totals or Average . .


HIGH SCHOOL


7 11.8


10


17.


Grade


9


..


·


.


. .


.


. .


. .


.


1


14


15


11


2


1


44


26


51.1


3


6.8


15


34.1


Grade 11


10


9


7


1


27


16


59.2


1


3.7


10


37.1


Grade 12


2


2


. .


. .


. .


. .


Post Graduate


·


66.1


17


8.9


40


25.


11


28


55


42


26


11


3


176


119


Totals or Average ..


The figures in bold faced type show the number of pupils of normal age for the grade; those at right of bold faced type show the number above normal age or "over age"; those at the left show the number below normal age or "under age." With a well adapted course of study and not too arbitrary system of marking, a school system in general should show about the same percentage of "over age" and "under age" pupils.


164


48 5


33 41


18 36


S


1


. .


. .


.


.


.


. .


. .


. .


. .


. .


10


23


19


6


1


. .


. .


1


44


33


75.


6


13.6


5


11.4


1


4


22


11


5


. .


Grade 10


.


.


. .


.


. .


.


.


·


.


. .


..


. .


.


2


..


142


97


68.3


36


20. 25.3


2


1.4


145


114


78.6


29


2


71


43


19


7


.


.


. .


..


.


158


135


85.4


21


.


11


1


.


59


42


71.2


Age


No. Under


% Under


.


9


1


18


HEALTH SUPERVISION-SUMMARY Sept. 1925, to Sept. 1926


Approximate date of examinations. Sept. 1925 to Dec. 1925 1312


Number of Pupils Examined


Cases


Defects Found


No. Cases Found


Notices Sent Treated Since


by Examiner


Parents


Last Exam.


Carious Teeth


558


348


802


Pendiculosis


70


70


Enlarged Tonsils


303


142


34


Defective Nasal Breathing


48


19


Cervical Glands


122


9


3


Heart


34


Fullness of Thyroid Gland


10


8


5


Disease of Skin


56


38


11


Deformity of Spine




Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.