USA > Maine > Kennebec County > Gardiner > One hundredth anniversary of the diocese of Maine, 1820-1920, Christ church, Gardiner, Maine, May thirtieth to June third > Part 8
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9
[ 109 ]
THE DIOCESE OF MAINE
a great English estate, entailed so that it could never be alienated or divided, inhabited by industrious and prosperous tenants, content with that subordinate state of life to which he believed God had called them, under the benevolent rule of his descendants, submitting themselves to the Rector and the Squire for the time being, ordering themselves lowly and reverently to all their betters. Faithful to his belief in the righteous- ness of the old order, which he conceived to have been ordained of God, he remained loyal, at the Revolution, to the King, and so, by retiring to England, risked, and subsequently lost, almost the whole of what was then a vast fortune, said to have been one of the two largest in America. It must have been a bitter experience for him to apply, as he was obliged to do, to the British Crown for the means of subsistence in England.
With all my heart, I rejoice that his dream failed of fulfilment. It was impossible, entirely contrary to the new spirit then beginning to stir in America and to that true democracy which Christ came to establish. Yet it was no ignoble dream. He thought it was the best way to devote his wealth to the welfare of the community, and he hoped that thus he could bind fast his posterity forever to the service of God through the Church. Deeply as we rejoice in the abolition of class distinctions, yet there was sometimes in the old order a sense of responsibility which we are in danger of losing, now that entrance into the ranks of the privi- leged comes largely from the acquisition of wealth. There was a deeper and more permanent inspiration in the principle that noblesse oblige than in paying an income tax of fifty per cent. Perhaps the old responsibility too easily felt itself discharged by the cold charity which was content to let the poor man gather the crumbs from the rich man's table, but even that was better than the bitter struggle between rich and poor, each to hold for himself all that he has and to wrest from the other as much more as possible.
My grandfather realized that his grandfather's hope to perpetuate the old order was contrary to American institutions, and his first act, on coming of age, was to break the entail, and thus open this beautiful tract of fertile country to the independent ownership of free American citizens. We, his descendants, still look to him with reverence. From his first dealings with the men who, in the long absence of his grandfather and the impossibility of any development during his own minority, had
[ 110 ]
ADDRESS OF WELCOME
settled upon his property without strict legal right, down to the day of his death, his first and only desire was to deal justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly before the Lord his God, and no man ever had, or more justly deserved, a finer epitaph than that beautiful inscription on the walls of the church whose completion we are celebrating, written by the saintly Bishop, for seventeen years his son, his brother, his closest friend.1 God grant that as long as his posterity exist among men, no one of them may ever fail to be loyal to his example.
The attempts which had been made in the earliest settlements of Maine, long before the Pilgrims and the Puritans, to establish the Church proved unsuccessful, and until some years after the Revolution, those who adhered to it were often sorely persecuted, and, in some places, taxed for the support of Congregationalism, then the established State Church. To the south of Massachusetts, and even in Boston, the Episcopal Church was securely founded. Many of the signers of the Declaration of Independence were Churchmen, and Washington, in whose hands God placed the foundation of the Republic, was a devout and loyal communicant. But many of its members throughout the coun- try were Loyalists, and the overthrow of the doctrine of the Divine right of kings too easily fostered prejudice against the Church, which, blind to its Divine commission, had too often regarded itself as the bulwark of the old order.
So the Church in the United States was slow in reaching any concep- tion of itself except as a sect among sects, without a universal message and responsibility. And that was especially true in Maine. In the dis- cussion as to which form of religion should be established in Bowdoin College, even my grandfather, devout and loyal Churchman as he was, debated with his fellow officers of the college only the comparative merits of Congregationalism and Methodism. Yet he had the vision of unity. Under the ministrations of the Rev. Mr. Humphrey, about a hun- dred and ten years ago, an effort was made to unite the Methodists with our Parish. But the Church, then in this country, as in England, in bonds to uniformity, insisted upon the letter of the Prayer Book as one of the cornerstones of unity, and the Methodists, still in the first flush of Wcs-
1 This Memorial, erected by the Parish of Christ Church, attests their grateful reverence for Robert Hallowell Gar- diner, from youth to age their leader, benefactor, and godly example.
[ 11] ]
THE DIOCESE OF MAINE
ley's protest against the deadly and mechanical formality which had brought the Church in England to the lowest ebb in its history, pre- ferred their freedom.
Yet the Parish and the Diocese had their share in the new life which was beginning to stir in the Church. Just before the erection of the present Church building, there was established here a Sunday-school, one of the earliest in the country, and Parish and Diocese shared early in the Evangelical awakening to missionary activity, a reflex of the preaching of Wesley and Whitefield, which first roused the Church to life and power, and prepared the way for the Tractarian movement, which deepened and extended the missionary motive by giving the Church the consciousness of its universal and corporate responsibility as the Body of Christ. For the permanent and life-giving root of that motive is the sharing in the life and purpose and hope for mankind of God Incarnate in the Person of the Son, and, for the generality of men, that motive is best quickened and strengthened by the special means of grace ministered through the Sacraments. We need the intense per- sonal conviction of immediate relation with God. Our Faith, that which makes us what we are, needs to be rooted personally in the personal Christ. But we need, too, the assurance that membership in Christ means membership in the Body of which He is the Head, and through which He ministers His Life to all who are bound together in Him.
But now, as the world grows smaller and men are more closely related to one another, the corporate aspect of our religion is the special need. It is more deeply true than at any time in history, that no man, nor any nation, can truly live in isolation. Yes, - never has there been greater need or opportunity for the corporate function of the Church. God established on the great high road between the earliest civilizations the people to whom He specially manifested His revelation of Himself as infinite, eternal, transcendent, righteous, and just. There He sent His Son to be made man to reveal His indwelling in the world in perfect love, that the knowledge of Him might be carried more swiftly to every part of the earth. That has now been done, for there is no corner of the globe to which the Gospel has not penetrated, or where men are not influenced, consciously or unconsciously, directly or indirectly, by Jesus Christ. There was an old prophecy that when the Gospel had been
[ 112 ]
ADDRESS OF IV ELCOME
preached to all the world, the Lord would come again in all His glory. It may be that tothe generation which is taking our places is vouchsafed the opportunity now to bring all His world to obedience to His law of Love. The ends of the earth have been brought together, and the whole world made one, so that the Church, to which God has entrusted the message of His Love Incarnate, may knit all men everywhere, of every race and tongue and clime, into the one Body of the one Lord, filled with His Spirit of love and service and sacrifice, that He may be all in all, and peace and righteousness established forever.
So while our children and our children's children to the remotest gen- eration must hold fast to all that our ancestors have preserved for them of the personal relation of the individual to God, yet the eyes of the generation to whose hands God is now entrusting the visible activities of the Church and the direction of the world must be fixed upon the vision of the Church, not as an aggregation of individuals, however saintly, but as the Body of Christ, the fullness of Him that filleth all in all.
The day of Democracy, toward which civilization has been struggling from its earliest dawn, often through blood and fire in all the horrors of war between nations and classes and individuals, is near at hand. It can- not be held back, for democracy is the instinct deeply implanted by God in the hearts of all men that they may be fit to be His friends, brothers of His Son and of one another in His Son. And because God wants men to be His friends, He has made us free, -free to share in His purposes of Love. or free, if we will, to thwart and postpone them.
But to seek to thwart oncoming democracy is to oppose the central doctrine of our Faith. For we who are Churchmen can find, if we look fearlessly and deeply, no permanent and efficient hope for the world except in Christ's New Commandment that we should love one another even as He also has loved us. To us is not offered the crown of martyr- dom by axe or fire. But there stands before each of us the opportunity for the utter surrender of self to the one Life of the one Body, that each of us may help to bring in a free and united world living the life of love. State and Church have their separate functions, and neither can yet attain fulfilment unless they are kept separate. But surely that is not the complete or permanent ideal. The State has been defined as soci- ety organized apart from God. The Church is, or would be if we gave
[ 113 ]
THE DIOCESE OF MAINE
ourselves to God's will, society organized, that is to say, vitalized and bound together, in God through Christ, charged with the duty of mani- festing His Will as to every relation in which men as individuals or classes or nations can stand to one another. The ground of real demo- cracy is the fact that God has taken upon Him the nature of every man, and the Church, which is the Body in which Christ dwells in His world, will be, if men cease to thwart the purpose of its Head, the life and guid- ing spirit of a truly democratic state.
So the present opportunity of the Church is to manifest itself as the one Body of Christ, Whose Law of love is the only solution of the problem of a world which shall not be desolated by horrors unspeakable. The divided Church, divided because each of us has fixed his gaze upon the motes in his brother's eye instead of standing with his brothers uplifted to the vision of the King in His beauty, has been powerless to prevent the war which has almost destroyed civilization in half the world and effaced the ideals of freedom in the rest. It had no one voice with which to protest effectively against the iniquities of a treaty which has sought to reduce to hopeless slavery a great nation, sinful though it may have been, yet whose industry and ability and thoroughness had helped so greatly to promote learning and science, and had so largely increased that material prosperity of the world which all of us have put before the advancement of the Kingdom of God.
And it will be a lasting blot on the history of this great Republic that, after we had, in the earlier years of the titanic struggle in Europe, accumulated most of the wealth of the world and bound all the nations to our service as our debtors, we have refused to share in the effort to recreate the world and have determined to pass by on the other side, letting bleeding, starving Europe writhe in agony till, if life and strength return, the nations may grapple one another again in a still more deadly struggle of hate. The problems which racked the world before the War remain unsolved, changed a little in outward form, but in essence the same, for their root was in the principle of competition,-selfishness under the thin disguise of another word. The evil to combat which the world poured out its blood and treasure was Force, but the victory has only substituted one force for another. Even in America, boasting it- self for more than a century as the land of the free, we have witnessed
[ 114 ]
ADDRESS OF WELCOME
with equanimity, if not with horrid joy, the oppression of conscience and the destruction of free speech. It is the same world, weakened by hunger and want, convulsed by new forces, falling into new alignments. Great mass movements are aroused that cannot be stemmed. To per- meate these new forces with the life of love, with the thought of the well-being of all, and not the salvation of the few, is the revolution for which we must work. The world is in revolution. It is for us to help to make it a Christian revolution.
God grant that the Church may yet open her eyes to the vision of the King of Love upon the Cross. If she can but catch a glimpse of that, all her divisions will be healed, for every member of the Body will be set free from self, whether it be the self of the individual, the class, the sect, or the nation. Love is the only enduring power and hope of the world, the only means by which mancan become what God, Who made man in His own Image, hopes and means him to be. Only in perfect love is perfect freedom and fulfilment-and the history of the world is the story of God's patience in teaching man that lesson. Do we really believe that Love is a powerful force, mightier than hate and greed and ambi- tion? If we do not, we take the name of Christian in vain. Let us, if we do not have this Faith, tear down our churches and remove from the fascinated eyes of aspiring men the light of the Cross. But He Who was lifted up does indeed draw all men unto Him. And so this occasion, which takes us back to the early days of the Church in America, is not for us so much a day of memories as a day of purpose. Every age has its own pioneers. Let us be pioneers of the new world of love.
[ 115 ]
-
CLERGY OF THE DIOCESE OF MAINE FROM 1820 TO 1920
Date No. Name
From
Cure
Transferred
1820 1. Timothy Hilliard
Massachusetts
Portland
1842
2. Gideon W. Olney
Massachusetts
Gardiner
1838
3. Petrus Stuyvesant Ten Broeck
Massachusetts
Portland
1836
1828 4. Thomas S. W. Mott
Massachusetts
Gardiner 1829
5. Lot Jones, D.D.
Georgia
1828
6. Samuel Fuller, D.D.
New York
Saco
1828
1829 1. Norris M. Jones
Massachusetts
Saco
1829
S. Isaac Peck
Massachusetts
Gardiner
1832
1831
9. Henry B. Goodwin
Virginia
Saco
1832
10. Joseph Muenscher, D. D.
Massachusetts
Saco
1834
1832 11. Joel Clap, D.D.
Vermont
Gardiner
1810
12. George T. Chapman, D.D.
Vermont
Portland
1835
1834
13. Stephen C. Millet
Massachusetts
Saco
1837
14. James Cook Richmond
Massachusetts
Augusta
1835
15. Samuel G. Appleton
Maine
1835
1835
16. William Horton. D.D.
Vermont
Saco
1840
1836 17. John W. French, D.D.
Pennsylvania
Portland
1840
IS37 18. Nicholas Hoppin, D.D.
New York
Bangor
1838
1$39 19. Frederick Freeman
Pennsylvania
Bangor
1845
1840 20. James Pratt, D.D.
Rhode Island
Portland
1858
21. Sylvester Nash
Virginia
Saco
1841
22. William Robinson Babcock
Maine
Gardiner
1848
23. Fernando C. Putnam
N. H.
Bangor
1844
1841 24. Thomas Lyman Randolph
Rhode Island
Saco
1842
25. John Blake
Maine
Houlton
1867
IS42 26. Eleazer A. Greenleaf
Massachusetts
Williamsburgh
1842
27. John West
Rhode Island
Bangor
1845
1843 28. Reuben E. Taylor
Maine
Saco
1845
29. Thomas F. Fales
Rhode Island
Brunswick
1849
30. Alexander Burgess, D.D.
Connecticut
Augusta
1867
1845 31. Frederick Gardiner, D.D.
Maine
Saco
1865
1846
32. Nathaniel T. Bent
Massachusetts
Bangor
1849
1847
33. Samuel Durborrow
Pennsylvania
Old Town
1852
34. David Greene Haskins
Maine
Gardiner
1847
35. Daniel Raynes Goodwin, D.D., LL.D.
Maine
Bowdoin College
1853
36. Jonathan Pinkney Hammond
Rhode Island
Saco
1849
1848
37. Edwin Winfield Murray
Maine
Dresden
1850
1849 38. George Clinton Van Kleeten Eastman
N. H.
Old Town
1851
39. George Slattery
Maine
Saco
1860
40. John Cotton Smith, D.D.
Ohio
Bangor
1852
41. Andrew Croswell
Massachusetts
Brunswick
1853
1850 42. George Wells Durell
Maine
Calais
1867
1851 43. William H. Caldwell Robertson
Virginia
Dresden
1852
44. Horatio Southgate, D. D., late Missionary Bishop
45. John Adams Jerome
Maine
1855
1852
46. Edwin Winfield Murray
Alabama
Dresden
1857
47. Daniel Cony Weston, D.D.
Maine
Old Town
1857
Port., St. Luke's
1852
[ 117 ]
THE DIOCESE OF MAINE
Cure Transferred
1853 48. Reuel Hotchkiss Tuttle
Connecticut
Old Town
1854
49. William Mortimer Willian 50. Benjamin H. Paddock, D.D.
Connecticut
Port., St. Luke's
1854
1854 51. Samuel Cowell
New York
Saco
1858
52. William Edmund Armitage, D.D.
N. H.
Augusta
1859
53. Charles Hathorn Wheeler
Maine
1856
54. Junius M. Willey 55. William Stone Chadwell
Maine
Brunswick
1860
1855 56. Edward Jessup
Massachusetts
Bath
1859
58. Nathaniel Ellsworth Cornwall, D.D.
Pennsylvania
Bangor
1857
59. Robert Paul
Maine
Old Town
1856
1856
60. Roger Strong Howard, D.D.
Maine
Portland
1861
61. Pelham Williams
Maine
Dresden
1861
1857 62. William Mortimer Willian
Massachusetts
Bangor
1869
63. Asa Dalton
Rhode Island
Bangor
1862
64. John Barret Southgate
Maine
Lewiston
1862
65. John Franklin Spaulding
Maine
Old Town
1859
1858
66. Edward Ballard, D. D.
Connecticut
Brunswick
18701
68. Daniel Cony Ingraham
Maine
Lewiston
18601
1859 69. Edwin Winfield Murray
Virginia
Dresden
18771
70. John Flavel Mines
Connecticut
Bath
1865
71. Gordon Moses Bradley
Massachusetts
Augusta
1863
1860 72. Nicholas Frederick Ludlum
N. H.
Lewiston
1864
73. James Holwell Kidder
Maine
Eastport
1863
74. Henry Ripley Howard
Maine
Rockland
1864
1861
75. William Stevens Perry, D.D.
N. H.
Port., St. Stephen's 1864
76. William Henry Brooks, D.D.
Massachusetts
Hallowell
1862
77. William Woodruff Niles, D.D.
Connecticut
Wiscasset
1865
Maine
Calais
1864
78. Daniel Freeman Smith 79. John Gierlow
Louisiana
Augusta
1864
1862 80. Samuel John Evans
Massachusetts
Saco
1869
1863 81. Daniel Goodwin
Rhode Island
Bangor
1869
82. Thomas Atkins
Maine
Dresden
18681
83. William Henry Collins
Rhode Island
Lewiston
1866
1864 84. James Augustus Sanderson 85. Asa Dalton
New York
Port., St. Stephen's 19121
1865 86. Edwin E. Johnson
Connecticut
Augusta
1868
87. James Douglas Reid
New York
Camden
1867
88. Edward Augustus Bradley
New York
Wiscasset
1869
89. William Packard Tucker
Maine
Bath
1869
90. John Thomas Magrath 91. Nathaniel Lindsay Briggs
Maine
Dexter
1867
1867 92. Flavel Scott Mines 93. Charles Wells Hayes
Western N. Y.
Port., Cathedral
1880
94. Charles Talcott Ogden
Ohio
Dexter
1872
1868 95. Julius Hammond Ward 96. Daniel Freeman Smith
Connecticut
Thomaston
1875
N. H.
Camden
1875
1 Deceased.
[ 118 ]
Massachusetts
Bangor
1856
Connecticut
Bath
1855
57. William Scott Southgate
Maine
1856
67. Edward Folsom Baker
Maine
Eastport
1867
Connecticut
Maine
Gardiner
1869
New York
Eastport
1869
Date No. Name
From
1858
CLERGY OF THE DIOCESE OF MAINE
Date No. Name
From
Cure Transferred
97. William James Alger
Western N. Y. Saco
1881
9S. William Henry Washburn
Maine
Ashland
18951
Connecticut
Augusta
1884
99. Samuel Upjohn 100. Nathaniel W. Taylor Root
New York
Port., St. Paul's 18721
1868 101. Chester Ingles Chapin 102. Thomas Marsden
New York
Winn
18831
1869 103. Edward Folsom Baker
Wisconsin
Lewiston
1871
104. Christopher Starr Leffingwell
Western N. Y.
Gardiner
19021
105. Leonard Kip Storrs
Maine
Hallowell
1871
106. Benjamin Franklin Cooley
Massachusetts
Camden
1869
107. Edward Goodridge
Connecticut
Wiscasset
1871
1810 108. Benjamin W. Atwell
Massachusetts
Camden
1874
109. Alonzo Norton Lewis
Connecticut
Dexter
1872
110. Horace B. Hitchings
Colorado
Bangor
1872
112. Frederic Clifton Neely
Maine
Port., Cathedral
113. James Davies
Exeter, Eng.
Old Town
1872
1871 114. Harry Leigh Yewens
Massachusetts
Lewiston
1875
115. Herbert Clarkson Miller
Connecticut
Ashland
1877
116. Joseph Pemberton Taylor
Pittsburgh
Brunswick
1873
117. Lewis Henry Jackson
Maryland
Eastport
1873
118. William B. Bolmer
Wisconsin
Old Town
1873
1872 119. Edward Coffin Gardner
Connecticut
Bangor
1876
120. Alexander Felix Samuels
Missouri
Old Town
1873
121. Edward Hubbell
Long Island
Bath
1874.2
122. Frederic Schroeder Sill
New York
Brunswick
1879
1813 123. Henry Rogers Pyne
Central N. Y.
Eastport
1889
124. Clarence Winship Colton
Mainc
Winn
1875
125. Hudson Sawyer
Maine
Hallowell
1889
126. Joseph Jenks
Massachusetts
Houlton
1875
127. Charles March Pyne
Connecticut
Port., Cathedral
1876
128. David Pise
Indiana
Port., St. Paul's
1855
1874 129. Medville McLaughlin
Maine
Ashland
1889
130. John Gregson
Mississippi
Bath
1881
131. George Milner Stanley
Connecticut
Camden
1877
132. Richard Price
England
Dexter
18751
133. Edwin Francis Small
Maine
Waterville
1885
134. Rodney Miller Edwards
Maine
Fort Fairfield
1878
135. Arthur Herbert Locke
Maine
Camden 1880
136. James Davies
Western N. Y.
Winn
1881
1875 137. Robert Wyllie
Maine
Lewiston
1878
138. Robert Clarke Caswall
Pittsburgh
Rockland
1876
139. Charles John Ketchum
Maine
Port., St. Paul's
1881
140. George Thomas Packard
Northern N. J.
Bangor
19051
1876 141. William Walker
Connecticut
Rockland
1883
1877 142. Charles Edwin Fitts
Maine
Ellsworth
1877
143. Harry Peirce Nichols
Pennsylvania
Brunswick
1883
144. James Sovraine Purdy
New York
Brunswick
18841
145. Merritt H. Wellman
New Jersey
Eastport
1888
1 Deceased. 2 Deposed.
[ 119 ]
New York
Eastport
1871
111. Clement Jonathan Whipple
N. H. Port., Cathedral 1872
THE DIOCESE OF MAINE
Cure Transferred
Date No. Name 1878 146. Charles Edwin Fitts
Rhode Island
Dresden
18802
147. Samuel Moran
Rhode Island
1879
1879 148. Henry Jones
Maine
Ashland
1884
149. Leverett Bradley, Jr.
Massachusetts
Gardiner
1884
150. Daniel Flack
New Jersey
Hallowell
1881
151. Charles James Palmer
New York
1880
1880 152. Andrew Merkel
Nova Scotia
Rockland
1883
153. Charles Morton Sills
Nova Scotia
Port., Cathedral
1902
154. Addison Munroe Sherman
Maine
1880
155. George Arthur Holbrook
Maine
1880
156. George Franklin Pratt
Maine
Bath
1884
157. William Allen Fiske
Illinois
Bangor
1888
158. Joseph A. Norwood
Nova Scotia
Calais
1881
159. William De Hart
Mississippi
Bath
1882
1881 160. John M. Bates
Connecticut
Waterville
1883
161. Arthur Wilde Little
N. H.
Port., St. Paul's
1888
162. George Samuel Hill
Maine
Exeter
18861
163. John Howard Veazey
Maine
Sherman
1886
164. Herbert M. Jarvis
Nova Scotia
Eastport
1883
1882 165. William Lionel Watson
Maine
Ashland
18862
1883 166. George Arthur Holbrook
Ohio
1888
167. William Dickinson Martin
New York
Dexter
1889
168. Edward P. Lee
Vermont
Trav. Missionary
1883
169. Charles T. Ogden
Vermont
Trav. Missionary
19111
1884 170. Walker Gwynne
Albany
Augusta
1894
171. Frederic Towers
Frederieton
Rockland
18863
172. Leonard W. Richardson
Iowa
Waterville
1886
173. Wyllys Rede
New York
1886
174. Henry Jones
Colorado
Camden 19171
175. Richmond Shreve
Nova Scotia
Gardiner
1888
1885 177. Robert N. Parke
Western N. Y.
Bath
1889
178. Carroll Everett Harding
Maine
Ashland
1888
179. Frederick Herbert Rowse
Maine
Fort Fairfield
1888
180. George Shuttleworth Atwood
Maine
18863
181. Joseph Dinzey
Quebec
Eastport
1892
1886 182. Albert W. Snyder
Chieago
Saco & Biddeford 1888
183. Lyman Herbert Merrill
Maine
Biddeford
1888
184. Frederick Pember
England
1888
185. William Timothy Elmer
Conneetieut
Presque Isle
1893
186. John MeGaw Foster
Massachusetts
Bangor
1899
187. Le Baron W. Fowler
Fredericton
No. East Harbor
19021
1887 188. William Alonzo Swan, Jr. 189. Joseph S. Colton
Quincy
Dexter & Exeter
1895
1888 190. Henry W. Winkley
Fredericton Saco
1899
191. Allen Everett Beeman
Conneetieut
Gardiner
1895
192. William H. Burbank
New York
Brunswick
1892
1889 193. David Vaughan Gwilym 194. Charles Laneaster Short
Frederieton
Houlton
1894
Massachusetts
Neweastle
1894
1 Deceased. 2 Deposed. 3 Approximate date of transfer.
[ 120 ]
From
Maine
1890
176. Charles Luke Wells
Massachusetts
1885
CLERGY OF THE DIOCESE OF MAINE
Date No. Name
From
Cure Transferred
195. Charles Henry Tindell
Rhode Island
Port., St. Paul's 1890
196. Artemus Allerton Murch
Maine
Sherman & Winn 1891
197. Lewis M. Wilkins
Nova Scotia
Fort Fairfield 1892
198. James W. Sparks 199. Harry W. R. Stafford
New York
Bath
1896
1890 200. Preston Barr
Massachusetts
No. East Harbor 1892
1891 201. Charles Edward Osgood Nichols
N. H.
Brunswick
1894
202. Gilbert Almon Ottmann
California
Port., St. Paul's
1892
203. Theodore L. Allen
Michigan
Dresden
1897
204. John S. Moody
New York
Rockland
1897
205. George Bruce Nicholson
Maine
Fort Fairfield
1916
206. Clarence W. McCully
Nova Scotia
Houlton
1892
201. Arthur W. Wrixon
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.