USA > Minnesota > Freeborn County > History of Freeborn County, Minnesota > Part 55
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45 | Part 46 | Part 47 | Part 48 | Part 49 | Part 50 | Part 51 | Part 52 | Part 53 | Part 54 | Part 55 | Part 56 | Part 57 | Part 58 | Part 59 | Part 60 | Part 61 | Part 62 | Part 63 | Part 64 | Part 65 | Part 66 | Part 67 | Part 68 | Part 69 | Part 70 | Part 71 | Part 72 | Part 73 | Part 74 | Part 75 | Part 76 | Part 77 | Part 78 | Part 79 | Part 80 | Part 81 | Part 82 | Part 83 | Part 84 | Part 85 | Part 86 | Part 87 | Part 88 | Part 89 | Part 90 | Part 91 | Part 92 | Part 93 | Part 94
WILLIAM E. TODD
511
HISTORY OF FREEBORN COUNTY
& Carlson, which partnership continued until his death in Novem- ber, 1899. Henry A. Morgan was admitted to the bar in May, 1885; entered into partnership with John A. Lovely and D. F. Morgan as the firm of Lovely, Morgan & Morgan in July of the same year and continued as such until 1891, when the firm was dissolved and he continued to practice alone, except for a few months in 1892 when he was in partnership with Walter J. Trask under the firm name of Morgan & Trask, until July, 1901, when the partnership of Morgan & Meighen was formed, composed of Henry A. Morgan and John F. D. Meighen, which partnership still exists. Walter J. Trask came to Albert Lea from St. Paul and entered into partnership with Henry A. Morgan under the firm name of Morgan & Trask, which partnership continued for six months, when Mr. Trask moved to Becker county and from there to Los Angeles, Cal., where he continued the practice of his profession with marked success and ability until he was sud- denly stricken while at work and died almost instantly in May, 1911. W. N. Crane was a product of Freeborn county and prac- ticed to a limited extent in the city, but never opened an indi- vidual office. He was city attorney for a term or two, but finally moved to Minot, N. D., where he successfully engaged in the practice of law. He died in the prime of life in the year 1909. R. S. Clements came to to Albert Lea from Wisconsin in the early nineties and was admitted to practice, and by close attention to business built up a very promising business. He was elected county attorney in 1898 and held the office for one term, and at the expiration of the term and on account of failing health moved west and located in Idaho, where he has met with complete suc- cess. H. C. Carlson is another product of Freeborn county. He graduated from the George Washington University, of Washing- ton, D. C., in October, 1897, and immediately entered into part- nership with W. E. Todd under the firm name of Todd & Carlson, and continued accordingly until the death of Mr. Todd, which occurred in November, 1899. Afterwards he continued to prac- tice alone until a partnership was formed with H. H. Dunn in 1908 under the firm name of Dunn & Carlson, which partnership now exists. He has long since been recognized as one of the able attorneys of the state and has earned and well deserves the title of a first class trial lawyer. R. S. Farnsworth practiced law in Albert Lea for about five years and in 1901 moved to Ogden, Utah, where he resumed the practice of law and is now located. . Edwin A. Church came to Albert Lea from Cresco, Iowa, and entered into partnership with Warren Buel in the real estate business under the firm name of Church & Buel. His business was practically confined to real estate, and obtaining no law
512
HISTORY OF FREEBORN COUNTY
practice he returned to Cresco, Iowa, within a short time. H. H. Dunn located in Albert Lea in January, 1899, succeeding to the law practice of John A. Lovely, who was elected justice of the supreme court in the fall of the previous year. After the retire- ment of Judge Lovely from the supreme bench he entered into partnership with him and the firm name was Lovely & Dunn. The business was carried on up to the time of the last illness of Judge Lovely, which resulted in his death in January, 1908. Mr. Dunn came to Albert Lea from Fairmont, Minn., where he had gained an enviable reputation and made an enviable record as a practitioner. He has always commanded an extensive and lucrative practice and is listed among the ablest attorneys of the state. He served in the senate from Watonwan and Martin counties in the session of 1907; was elected mayor of Albert Lea in 1900, and was elected to the lower branch of the legislature from Freeborn county in 1910, and elected and served as speaker of the house during the succeeding session. John F. D. Meighen graduated from the University of Michigan in 1900 and was admitted to the bar in Michigan the same year. In February, 1901, he located in Albert Lea and after gaining the required residence was admitted to practice in Minnesota, and in July of the same year entered into partnership with Henry A. Morgan under the firm name of Morgan & Meighen, which partnership has continued to the present time. He is recognized as one of the able attorneys of the state and one of the most prudent, studious and careful lawyers to be found anywhere, and as a counsellor his opinions are regarded as safe, sound and reliable wherever he is known. John G. Skinner is another Freeborn county boy and made his way and launched into the practice of law in the city of Albert Lea in 1900; was elected city attorney and served for a term or two, also serving a term as county attorney. He engaged in general practice and was connected with numerous cases of importance until he obtained an appoint- ment as special counsel for the government in regard to land fraud cases, and as a result of such employment, requiring his attention in large sections of the west, he finally located at Helena, Mont., where he enjoys the benefit of a well earned prac- tice. C. E. Southwick located in Albert Lea several years ago, but made real estate his chief business. He was city attorney for a term or two, but soon apparently abandoned the law busi- ness here and returned to his former home and has not main- tained an office here for several years. A. U. Mayland was ad- mitted to practice in 1895 and located in Albert Lea in 1896 and immediately entered upon the active practice of his profession and by close application, industry and honesty and demonstrated
شله
TOWARD HT DUINN
513
HISTORY OF FREEBORN COUNTY
ability has built up a lucrative practice and established an envi- able reputation. He served two terms as county attorney from 1901 to 1905. He was elected judge of probate in 1908, which position he now holds and has filled with marked credit to him- self and general satisfaction of everybody. In January, 1909, the partnership of Mayland & Peterson was formed, consisting of A. U. Mayland and J. O. Peterson, which firm is doing a pros- perous business. N. E. Peterson is a graduate of the George Washington University of Washington, D. C., and is another Freeborn county product. He was admitted to practice in 1903 and elected county attorney in 1906 and by successive elections lias held the office and is the present county attorney of this county. He has served the county with credit to himself and distinguished ability. He is regarded as imminently fair and enjoys the confidence and respect of all who know him. Augus- tus Armstrong, a son of the pioneer attorney of Freeborn county, was admitted to practice in 1900 and maintained an office and practiced law in this county for some time, but concluded to locate in the west and accordingly established himself in Seattle, Wash., where he has been engaged in the practice of his pro- fession and now commands a prosperous and successful business in his chosen profession and calling. T. V. Knatvold was ad- mitted to the bar in about 1904, and afterwards was in partner- ship with H. H. Dunn under the firm name of Dunn & Knatvold for some time and has since been and now is actively engaged in the practice of his profession in the city of Albert Lea and enjoys the respect and confidence of everyone. He represented Freeborn county in the state senate in the sessions of 1895-7-9 and 1901, and served with distinguished ability in that capacity. J. O. Peterson, present city attorney, was admitted to the bar in 1907 and located in Albert Lea in January, 1909, and entered into partnership with A. U. Mayland under the firm name of Mayland & Peterson. This firm is recognized as one of the reliable law firms of the county and Mr. Peterson is considered one of the promising attorneys of the county and regarded as trustworthy in every respect. A. H. Bartlett, of Glenville, and H. B. Collins, of Alden, were both practitioners of the old school, but seldom, if ever, appeared in district court in contested cases. They were counsellors and advisors but not trial lawyers. They neither encouraged nor discouraged strife among neighbors and friends. H. G. Latourell maintained an office at Alden for two or three years in the early nineties, but moved to Jackson county and has never returned to Freeborn county to resume the prac- tice. P. C. Cornish maintained a law office at Alden and prac- ticed in the county and for a number of years and engaged in the
514
HISTORY OF FREEBORN COUNTY
trial of cases of local importance and demonstrated considerable ability. In 1906 he removed to Jackson county and has not since engaged in the practice of law in this county.
The editors feel especially fortunate in having secured as the writer of this article, one who is not only recognized as the lead- ing attorney of Freeborn county, but one who since 1880 has been prominently identified with practically every important liti- gation in this part of southern Minnesota. In order that a more extended biography than he has given himself, be here preserved, the editors have secured the following sketch of his career :
Henry A. Morgan came to Albert Lea in 1880 as a clerk and stenographer in the law offices of Lovely & Morgan (John A. Lovely and D. F. Morgan), and studied law in that office. He was admitted to the bar in May, 1885, and in July became a member of the firm. Ever since that time he has been continu- ously engaged in active practice as a lawyer at Albert Lea. During 1889-1890 he was city attorney at Albert Lea and from 1891 to 1899 the county attorney of Freeborn county. An excel- lent memory, an alert mind and an aggressive and essentially masculine make-up rendered him unusually successful as a prose- cutor. From 1901 to the present time he has been in partnership with John F. D. Meighen, under the firm name of Morgan & Meighen. His practice has been general, ranging from the in- ferior courts to the United States Supreme Court, but its heavy and exacting requirements have never marred his companionable disposition, deadened the ringing tones of his powerful voice or injured his ability to tell an apt story. He is an active member of the State Bar Association, and also a member of the National Bar Association. Few present day lawyers have had more part in forming the statute law of Minnesota. Not only during his term as state senator (1903-1907), but ever since first entering the profession, he has taken active part in formulating measures that have been incorporated into the settled law of the state. Matters of game legislation, drainage legislation and court pro- cedure have received his especial attention. In 1889, when city attorney, he drafted a city charter for the city of Albert Lea, known by lawyers as Chapter 10 of the Special Laws of Min- nesota, 1889. This directed his attention to the question of municipal charters and local self government. As soon as the constitutional amendment permitting home rule charters in Min- nesota was adopted, in 1898, Mr. Morgan commenced urging the appointment of a charter commission to draft a home rule char-
515
HISTORY OF FREEBORN COUNTY
ter for the city of Albert Lea. This was done and he became an active and efficient member of the commission which drafted the charter adopted in 1902 by the voters and still in force. The pro- visions therein with reference to local improvements and fran- chises were nearly all prepared by him. At the time of its adoption he was mayor of the city of Albert Lea and his official certificate as such appears attached to the original duplicate copies of the charter filed as required by the state constitution in the office of the secretary of state and in the office of the city clerk. Ever since that time he has taken an active interest in the amendments that have been made and is now president of the charter commission. . Henry Augustus Morgan was born in Clarinda, Page county, Iowa, March 14, 1863, son of Harley Mor- gan and Ruth Dupray Morgan, his wife, both of Vermont, and descended from original Welch and Huguenot stock. He re- ceived his early education in the graded schools of Hesper, Iowa, and in the Albert Lea high school, from which he gradu- ated in 1882. As already related he has devoted his life to the practice of law. He has been a director in the Albert Lea State Bank since its organization. Fraternally he was a charter mem- ber of the local Knights of Pythias Lodge, and he also belongs to the Blue Lodge, Chapter and Commandery of the Masonic body, as well as to the Royal Arcanum. For the past twenty-five years he has been a leading spirit in all organizations for the better- ment of civic and business conditions, being at present a member of the Business Men's League. September 1, 1886, he married Helen A. Hall, daughter of Albert and Anna P. (Parker) Hall, natives of Maine, and this union has been blessed with two chil- dren : Philip, who died when 7 years of age, and Barbara J.
THE DRAINAGE OF THE RICELAND MARSH.
At the county fair in September, 1910, a crowd of spectators was ever present about one of the exhibits. The flax, corn, sugar beets, beans, potatoes and other vegetables composing it were excellent specimens and attractive in themselves, but the par- ticular object most viewed was a large placard announcing that the entire exhibit had been grown by C. U. Christensen, a farmer of Riceland Township, in the bed of Rice Lake, where up to the year before the musk rats and wild ducks had ruled for cen- turies. Then, too, the news was being passed about that P. D. McMillen was about to market $12,000 worth of flax raised that year on 200 acres of the marsh land east of Rice Lake. For years
516
HISTORY OF FREEBORN COUNTY
conservatives had insisted'that Rice Lake with the surrounding Geneva-Riceland-Moscow Marsh could never be successfully drained. Here was the concrete answer.
Prior to 1901 the drainage laws of Minnesota were somewhat meager, but in that year the legislature provided a complete sys- temi for ditches to be built under the direction of the public authorities at the cost of the benefited lands. In the towns of Geneva, Riceland and Moscow was a marsh of some 15,000 acres, useless except during unusually dry seasons. A large portion of this was owned by P. D. McMillen, of Minneapolis, and by Mrs. Mary J. Barber and B. H. Barber, both of Polo, Ill., who had, during prior years, carefully investigated the drainage prob- lem and fully satisfied themselves that it was practical to turn this marsh land into the best of farm land.
On September 26, 1901, a petition headed by the signature of Kenneth MacRae and signed by several land owners was filed in the county auditor's office initiating the drainage proceeding known as County Ditch No. 2. and asking for the appointment of an engineer and viewers. Protests arose from nearly every corner of the county and the county commissioners who were to hear and pass upon the petition were deluged with objections. A citizen of Twin Lakes asserted in a newspaper communication that the drainage of our marshes would diminish the rainfall and make Freeborn county a desert. Today, after the lapse of ten years, most of these objections seem highly amusing, but at that time they were seriously urged. On March 11, 1902, at the annual town meeting in Carlston it was "On motion resolved, by a unanimous vote of the legal voters of said town of Carlston, that we are opposed to the county commissioners letting the con- tract for draining Rice Lake and big swamps in the county of Freeborn." On the same day the voters of the town of Hay- ward, by a solemn resolution in writing made known "That we are opposed to bonding said county for any private enterprise whatever and that we are opposed to bonding said county for the purpose of draining what is known as Rice Lake in said county, and if the county commissioners of said county grant the peti- tion for draining said Rice Lake, we condemn such action." In the town of Manchester on that town meeting day, lengthy reso- lutions were adopted urgently requesting the county commis- sioners "To do all in their power to prevent the construction of said ditch and thereby save the county from expensive litigation and burdensome taxes" and setting forth that tlie proposed ditch would solely and alone redound to the gain of private indi- viduals. One taxpayer in Alden filed his individual written pro- test and recited as his objection that "It will be only the
517
HISTORY OF FREEBORN COUNTY
beginning of similar propositions, as there is hardly a township in the county but that will petition y( r honorable board for the establishing of a drain within its bord s." In Albert Lea Town- ship fifty-seven of the leading freeholders petitioned the county . board "That you cease all efforts to ditch what is known as the Riceland Marsh and we hereby protest against such ditching as being unwise and unjust. We feel that it is not wise to loan public credit for the exclusive benefit of a few speculators who hope to enhance the value of their nearly worthless lands by the aid only of public works. We feel it is very unjust to entail a lien on our property without our consent. That to bond our county, as will be necessary, the financial world will look with suspicion on all municipal loans offered from this county." In the town of Mansfield a resolution was adopted at that same spring town meeting in these words: "Whereas, the Board of County Commissioners is about to bond the county of Freeborn for the purpose of draining private lands; therefore we legal voters in the town of Mansfield, in annual meeting assembled, do hereby protest against, and object to, such action." Sixty-eight taxpayers of Bancroft filed a written protest, saying: "Our op- position is based on our belief that the damages caused by its construction will be greater than the benefits accruing there- from and that in many respects the ditch is impracticable. The present population of Freeborn eounty is not in need of more lands to till, but in need of more laborers to till the present area of land that is fit for cultivation. That will be a great damage to the towns through which the ditch will pass, as it will be necessary for them to tax themselves to the utmost limits of the law in order to build roads and maintain bridges across the ditches, and considering the character of the soil these roads will be a perpetual annoyance and expense and will require, to a great extent, aid from the county." In the town of Alden a resolution was adopted by unanimous vote of the electors at the annual town meeting and to make it even more forceful seventy- one taxpayers affixed their signatures thereto. It petitioned "against the issue of bonds or the assuming of any obligation whatever in regard to the construction of any ditch under the drainage laws of Minnesota, and do hereby respectfully ask that your honorable board refuse the prayer of the petition before you regarding the construction of the same. And in case any litigation might arise from your refusal to grant said petition we do hereby declare that we will cheerfully pay our respective share of whatever expense may accrue from such action on said petition." In passing it may be remarked that although the county records show that considerable expense resulted from the
518
HISTORY OF FREEBORN COUNTY
refusa! to grant the petition, the records do not indicate any especial activity in the town of Alden toward sharing payment of such expenses. In Shell Rock the vote stood forty-two to nothing in favor of a motion unanimously opposing the bonding of the county for drainage purposes. Pickerel Lake likewise registered its vigorous opposition. The feeling of many was ex- pressed by an attorney for the county who said in argument : "The 1901 law was boodled and lobbied through that body-the legislature. Old McMillen's boast and brag was, 'I have got a law now so that you have got to lay that ditch.' * There is not a sensible minded person in Freeborn county who is not opposed to that ditch. The 1902 amendment denying appeal from - an order laying a ditch is corrupt, venal legisla- tion." Much of the same state of mind existed in the town of London, where it was resolved, "That the town of London pro- test against the construction of the proposed Riceland-Moscow ditch (and that there be a few cuss words interlined for them that favor it)."
One of the viewers, T. P. Jensen, a shoe merchant residing in the city of. Albert Lea, reported favorably to the proposed ditch. He estimated the total benefits at $255,692.50 and the total of construction, including damages for right of way, at $150,734.80. The other two viewers were both farmers and reported that the benefits would be far less than the cost of construction, and that the construction of the ditch was impracticable. At the final hearing before the Board of County Commissioners it was seri- ously urged that such large deposits of quicksand existed that the ditch could not be constructed, and by a vote of four to one the county board turned down the petition, A. G. Brundin, the city member, being the only commissioner who voted "aye."
Land owners owning approximately 75 per cent of the bene- fited lands appealed to the District Court. Judge Kingsley granted a motion to dismiss the appeal in January, 1904, but in July, 1904, the Supreme Court reversed his decision and ordered a trial, which was had in January, 1905, Judge O. B. Lewis, of Ramsey county, acting as the trial judge. The county board headed the fight against the ditch and employed attorneys to assist the county attorney in defending their action. Many legal questions were raised, but the trial came to an end because it was discovered that in the printing of the second notice the names of certain land owners had been omitted.
In January, 1906, a new petition, headed by Hans J. Eid and signed wholly by local men, was filed. It had been circulated by Lewis A. Brown, of the city of Albert Lea. This time the pro- ceeding was known as Judicial Ditch No. 1. The intervening
519
HISTORY OF FREEBORN COUNTY
years had educated the public greatly on the question of ditches. Many of the most active opponents had been converted into equally active friends. A number of the legal questions had been removed by amendments to the drainage law during the session. of. 1905. The objections from Mower county were obviated by extending the ditch over two miles further down the line of Turtle Creek. The fears that it would drain Geneva Lake were obviated by providing for retaining works at the outlet of the lake. The second proceeding was addressed directly to the judge of the District Court and did not come before the county - com- missioners for action. No particular opposition was made and the proceeding had only the usual incidents of work of such mag- mitude. Pursuant to the order of the court, made in March, 1907, establishing the ditch the contract was let on April 4, 1907, and the ditch was built during the years 1907-1908 and 1909.
The number of cubic yards in the ditch as finally constructed was 1,739,799 ; the yardage in the original proceeding, County Ditch No. 2, was 1,333,497. The increase in yardage resulted from the extension of the main line into Mower county.
Particular credit for this magnificent public improvement is due to B. H. Barber, of Polo, Ill., and to P. D. McMillen. The faith of the former in the ultimate success of the enterprise is well illustrated in a communication sent by him to the county board March 23, 1903, in which he offers to give bond to pay all his assessments as rapidly as they become due, regardless of whether or not the drainage system is a success, and further offers to purchase any and all lands of reliction lying within the meander line of Rice Lake that may be sold for non-payment of the assessments against them. Mr. McMillen's farm has become one of the prize farms of southern Minnesota; its subsoil of fuller's earth has attracted wide attention and many of the lead- ing agricultural experts of the county have visited it and praised its marvelous productive power. The much talked of beds of quicksand never stopped the course of ditch construction. No lands assessed have ever been sold for non-payment of assess- ments ; the financial credit of the county has not been injured and the many objections have faded into nothingness.
The bottom width of the ditch as constructed runs from six feet in width on one lateral branch to sixty feet in width for the last 15,600 feet of the main line. The main line is 93,500 feet in length. There are nine lateral branches, the shortest being 1,200 feet long and the longest 20,500 feet long. The fall for the first 8,000 feet is 3.69 feet per mile and for the balance of the main line 9.5 inches per mile.
Any account of this undertaking, which added twenty-four
520
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.