USA > New York > Names of persons for whom marriage licenses were issued by the secretary of the province of New York, previous to 1784 > Part 1
USA > New York > Names of persons for whom marriage licenses were issued by the secretary of the province of New York, previous to 1784 > Part 1
USA > New York > Names of persons for whom marriage licenses were issued by the secretary of the province of New York, previous to 1784 > Part 1
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org.
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45 | Part 46 | Part 47 | Part 48 | Part 49 | Part 50 | Part 51 | Part 52 | Part 53
Gc 974.7 N421n 1142481
GENEALOGY COLLECTION
ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3 1833 00825 2089
GC 974.7 N421N
Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2015
https://archive.org/details/namesofpersonsfo00newy_0
NAMES OF PERSONS
FOR WHOM
MARRIAGE LICENSES
WERE ISSUED BY THE
SECRETARY
OF THE
PROVINCE OF NEW YORK,
PREVIOUS TO 1784.
PRINTED BY ORDER OF GIDEON J. TUCKER, SECRETARY OF STATE.
ALBANY : WEED, PARSONS AND COMPANY. 1860.
INTRODUCTION.
BY E. B. O'CALLAGHAN.
1142481
THE origin of Marriage Licenses, in the territory com- prised within the State of New York, merits a word or two of explanation.
Under the Roman-Dutch law, which obtained in New- Netherland on its first colonization, the following particu- lars were requisite to constitute a legal marriage:
All persons desirous of entering the married state were obliged to appear before the Court of Justice, or the Minis- ters of the Church of their place of abode, where they had their fixed domicil for the last year and day, and to apply there, for three Sundays or Market Days, when publications of the banns were to be made in the Church or the Court House, or other places where the Court of Justice was held; and every one who had any impediment to propose, was obliged to state the same in the meantime, on pain of being otherwise deprived of that right.
These proclamations were designed to preserve the right of a third person; marrying in church being held to be
15.00 1
IV
INTRODUCTION.
only an external ceremony of a public confirmation intro- duced likewise for better security.
As cases, however, might arise where it would be impossi- ble to comply with the general law, provision was made for dispensing with such proclamations for legal and valid reasons, by consent of the government, or (some held) of the judge .*
From these provisions of law, Marriage Licenses-which are only dispensations from the proclamation of Banns- took their origin in this country.
When the Colony passed into the hands of the English, the practice continued to prevail ; Marriage License issued by them, bearing date as early as 29th December, 1664,f being found on record. Subsequently, the collating to Benefices, granting Licenses of Marriage and Probate of Wills were declared in the Royal Instructions, to be exclu- sively reserved to the governor.}
The License was issued from the Provincial Secretary's office, and in return those obtaining it gave a Penal Bond in the sum of £500, that there was no " lawful let or im- pediment of Pre-Contract, Affinity or Consanguinity, to hinder the parties being joined in the Holy Bonds of Matri- mony, and afterwards their living together as Man and Wife."
There are forty volumes of these Bonds in the office of the Secretary of State. The names of the parties licensed to marry, contained in these and in other State Records, having been indexed in alphabetical order, application was
* Van Leeuwen's Commentaries on the Roman-Dutch Law. London : 1820, p. 72.
+ New York General Entries, I. 85.
# New York Colonial Documents, III. 372, 668.
V
INTRODUCTION.
made to the Hon. GIDEON J. TUCKER, late Secretary of State, for authority to print the Index, for public convenience, and it composes the present Volume.
The date prefixed to each name is that of the License or of the Bond. The abbreviation for the title of the volume of Records is affixed to the name.
EXPLANATION OF ABBREVIATIONS
A. R., Refers to volumes known as Albany Records, and indorsed-Translations from the Dutch.
C. A.,
volumes indorsed-Court of Assize.
C. M.,
volumes indorsed-N. Y. Colonial MSS.
C. Min., 66 volumes indorsed-Council Minutes.
E., volume indorsed-Entries.
G. E., 66 volume indorsed-General Entries.
M. B.,
volumes indorsed-Marriage Bonds.
O. W. L., volume indorsed-Orders, Warrants and Letters.
O. W., volume indorsed-Orders, Warrants.
P. B., volume indorsed-Pass Book.
W. O. P. volume indorsed-Warrants, Orders, Passes.
The practice of issuing Marriage Licenses fell into total desuetude in this State, on the Evacuation of New York by the British in 1783. It continued for some years longer in the State of Pennsylvania, as appears by the following letters of Bishop White, to the Governor of that Common- wealth :
Sir,
[1778]
When I had ye Honor, yesterday, of stating to your Excellency my Objections to ye present System of Marriage Licenses, & you condescended to recommend to me ye promoting of a clerical Representation of ye Sub- ject ; I expressed my Doubts as to ye Expediency of such a Measure. My Reason is, that I do not think ye Clergy, as such, materially interested in the correcting of ye Evil. We marry whom we please, under no other Restriction than what should prevail in every Line of Life, if not invading
vi
INTRODUCTION.
of ye Rights of others. It is true, a Stranger may be imposed on, by his imagining that a License from Government is something more than a blank Paper. But to prevent this, I have made it my Business to advertise every such, of ye Church under my care, of ye State of ye Case & of his own Responsibility.
It was as a citizen that I introduced ye Subject to your Excellency ; And ye Evils which, as such I reprobate in ye present System are as follow :
1. The Practice of issuing Licenses is, as I apprehend, without any Foun- dation of Law. The only Passage in our Acts of Assembly that can be supposed applicable, & this can be so by Implication only, defines a lawful License to be one which contains ye Consent of the Parent or Guardian expressed in ye Body of it. But such a License I never saw, nor do I know of any Clergyman who has.
2dly. It seems to me (I speak it with submission) disreputable to Govern- ment to be in ye Exercise of an Act of Authority, disregarded (as far as I can hear) & that with Impunity, by the most respectable Clergymen in this City ; who instead of thinking themselves under any Obligation, either of Law or of Morals, to ask for ye Licence, consider it rather as a Snare, against which they are to be on their Guard.
3dly. The Licenses, as issued, are a most cruel Invasion of domestic Rights. For, as if it were not enough, that ye Citizen has ye Peace of his Family exposed to ye Acts of ye desperate Adventurer, ye Villain robs him of his Child under a warrant with ye Seal of ye State annexed to it, & signed by ye first Magistrate. I hope your Excellency will not mistake me ; I am as much an Enemy to domestic Tyranny as to ye civil ; And I know that there sho'd be a certain Age when young People may dispose of themselves without the Consent of their Parents. What I contend for is, that there should also be a Period, during which ye Parent should have an uncon- troulable Authority over ye Child, in ye Article of preventing Marriage.
As to ye Bond of £100 taken at the office, I think nothing of it. . To my certain Knowledge it has been taken, both before & since ye Revolution, from persons not worth 100 pence ; And besides, there are Doubts as to ye Recovery of ye Penalty. I should be sorry to be understood, in this Part of ye Subject, as reflecting either on ye worthy Gentleman who has, nom- inally, ye Administration of ye Licenses, or on his Deputy, who is supposed to do his Business. On ye contrary, I declare that I believe ye Fault to be, not in them, but in ye System, which while it prevails, must involve ye present Consequences, let who will have ye Administration. And besides, I have not seen above one or two Licenses during Col. Biddle's Secretaryship nor long before.
vii
INTRODUCTION.
4thly. It may be of Importance to mention that ye Practice has been stigmatised as illegal by ye Council of Censors. I speak from Report, not having seen their Resolves on ye Subject. But my Authority is such that I cannot doubt ye Truth of it.
And now, Sir, if your Excellency is disposed to listen to my Proposal of a Remedy, it is as follows :
1. In regard to all Persons marrying agreeably to ye Notifications required by their respective religious Societies, ye Clergyman celebrating ye Marriage sh'd be responsible in a pecuniary, or, if you please, on repeated Transgression, in a corporal Penalty. If meer publication be made sufficient, it will amount to Nothing ; because it may be made (& is made in some Congregations) in such a Manner as to be a meer Evasion.
2dly. As to Persons who may not come within ye Rules of any religious Society, some Mode of Publication sh'd be provided for them. There is one indeed, but it is thought insufficient.
3dly. The License sh'd be considered as a Dispensation from ye Notoriety of Publication ; And accordingly, Government sh'd assume ye Responsibility. The dispensing Officer should have a Reward proportioned to his Trouble & Risque. He sh'd be liable to a Penalty, according to ye Damage sustained at ye Discretion of ye Court, within certain Limits. He sh'd therefore, be ye Judge of ye Amount of ye Security to be required ; And if he take insufficient Bondmen, it sh'd be at his Peril. The most material Difficulty that can occur in ye above Plan is ye discretionary Power of ye Court. But I know no other Substitute for ye English Mode, which is ye taking of Oaths that there is no legal Impediment.
Your Excellency's desiring of me to state my Sentiments in writing has occasioned you ye Trouble of reading this long Letter. I am not tenacious of any Advice I have presumed to offer ; But am fixed in my knowledge of ye Fact & I hope ye Freedom of ye Citizen will justify my declaring it, that ye present Practice makes Government contribute to ye sacrificing of ye Peace, Honor & Fortunes of Families.
I have ye Honor to subscribe myself, Your Excellency's very humble Servant,
WM. WHITE.
His Excell'y, Thos. Mifflin, Esq.
Sir,
Dec. 22, 1790.
In Compliance with your Excellency's Intimation, I am emboldened to lay before you briefly, the Substance of what I formerly delivered to you more at large, on the present State of Law and Practice, on ye Subject of Marriage.
viii
INTRODUCTION.
The Objections which I had the Honor to state to you against ye Marri- age Licenses, were that it is a taking of Money out of ye people's pockets, without even ye Colour of Law, that it had been stigmatized on this Acct. by the Council of Censors ; and that to my certain Knowledge, it prostitutes ye Chief Magistrates Name & invades Domestic Rights, by the Sanction it gives to clandestine Marriages.
It is true, the Abuse is considerably lessened, by ye intire Neglect which is shown the License, by ye greater number of the Clergy of all Denominations ; who depend on their own Precaution against what they think the Snares of ye govermental License. But I submit to your Excellency whether it be not a great Evil to leave Matters on this Footing.
It is now so well understood that no Man takes out a License, but either thro' Ignorance or for a Cover to an illegal Transaction, that we may pre- sume the Doing without them will more and more prevail. It must be obvious to every Man how much this subjects the Happiness of families to the sudden Determination of very young People. Under such a Dispen- sation from all preparatory Measures, would it be surprising to hear, that a Girl of the Age at which Matrimony may be contracted, were induced by a Toy or by a Sugar Plumb, to put an artful Man into ye possession of a For- tune; out of which he would only have to pay £50 for ye Irregularity of ye Manner. Impositions may happen far short of this, yet very distressing to Families and ruinous to the Peace of ye Parties.
So far as ye Clergy in particular are concerned, it subjects ye conscien- tious to great Difficulties; It gives those of ye opposite Description un- bounded License ; and it subjects to ye Determination of either (and that in situations of great Delicacy) a Question involving Property and Character and Happiness.
In what Manner an evil of so great Magnitude is to be remedied, I pre- sume not to say. But I will hint what I think ye great Outline of ye Busi- ness ; viz. : That in Favor of these who either cannot, or who, from consci- entious Scruples, will not pay for a License, there should be pointed out an unequivocal Mode of Publication ; and that a License being a Dispensation from ye Notoriety of Publication, the Officers issuing it should be account- able and should receive a Fee proportioned to ye Trust and to ye Vigilance required in it.
With Sentiments of Respect & Esteem, I have the honor to write myself, your Excellency's very humble Servant,
WM. WHITE. Directed, His Excellency, the Governor .*
* Pennsylvania Archives, XII. 31, 314.
IX
INTRODUCTION.
FORM OF BOND GIVEN on obtaining a Marriage Licence for RICHARD MONT- GOMERY, Esq., afterwards Major-General in the Ameri- can Army.
KNOW all Men by these Presents, That Henry B. Livingston, of Dutchess County, Esquire, and John Livingston, of New York, Gentleman, are held and firmly bound unto our Sovereign Lord GEORGE the Third, by the Grace of GOD, of Great-Britain, France, and Ireland, King, Defender of the Faith, &c. in the Sum of Five Hundred Pounds, current Money of the Province of New-York, to be paid to his said Majesty, or his Heirs and Successors : For the which Payment, well and truly to be made and done, We do bind Ourselves, and each of Us, our and each of our Heirs, Executors, and Administrators, and every of them, firmly by these Presents. Sealed with our Seals, dated the Fourth Day of August, in the Thirteenth Year of his said Majes- ty's Reign. Annoque Domini, One Thousand Seven Hundred and Seventy-Three.
THE CONDITION of this OBLIGATION, is such, That whereas the above-bounden Henry B. Livingston and John Livingston have obtained a LICENCE OF MARRIAGE for Richard Montgomery, of the Out- ward of New- York, Gentleman, & Jennet Livingston, of Dutchess County, Spinster, of the other Party. Now if it shall not appear hereafter, that they, or either of them the said Richard Montgomery & Jennel Livingston have any lawful Let or Impediment of Pre-Contract, Affinity, or Consanguinity, to hinder their being joined in the Holy Bands of Matrimony, and afterwards their living together as Man and Wife: Then this Obligation to be void, and of none Effect; or else to stand, remain, abide, and be in full Force and Virtue.
HENRY B. LIVINGSTON, [L. s.] JOHN LIVINGSTON. [L. s.]
Sealed and Delivered in the Presence of
JNO. GRUMLY.
NEW YORK MARRIAGES.
A.
DATE. NAMES. RECORD.
VOL. PAGE.
1763. April 2. Abberfield, Mary, and John Laghlieu,
M. B., VII. 111
1764. June 28. Abbet, John, and Ann Neitherway, VIII. 243
1762. Aug. 25. Abbot, Abijah, and Mary Smith,.
VI. 287
1761. Jan. 24. Abbot, John, and Mary McDougal,
IV. 28
1771. Dec. 3. Abbot, Joseph, and Mary Harman, XVII. 281
1772. Oct. 3. Abbot, Mary, and Epinetas Knap, ..
XIX. 68
1760. Aug. 8. Abbot, Rebecca, and Charles Campion,
III. 245
1761. Nov. 9. Abbot, Rebecca, and William Cowley,. v. 196
1763. Nov. 19. Abeel, Cathlina, and Elbert Willett, . VII. 456
1757. Oct. 14. Abeel, Jacobus, and Abigail Van Buren, I. 670
66
III. 423
1759. Sept. 22. Abeel, John, and Mary Knouts, .
II. 429
1771. July 20. Abel, Andrew, and Johannah Marshal,
XVII. 137
1763. Feb. 1. Abel, Ann, and Thomas Kirkes,
VII.
44
1753. June 2. Abel, Churchil James, and Agnus Spencer,
I. 46
1762. Jan. 8. Abel, Jane, and Thomas Lane, VI.
I. 423
1775. July 27. Ablin, John, and Charlotte Hall,.
XXIII. 107
1757. Dec. 23. Ablin, Peter, and Mary Brazier,.
I. 751
1762. April 7. Abraham, Elizabeth, and John Zimmerman,
VI. 91
1757. Sept. 19. Abrahams, Sarah, and Archelaus Lynd, . I. 638
1757. April 18. Abrahams, Angenetie, and Peleg Burling, I. 504
1782. Feb. 18. Abrams, Catharine, and William Doxy, 66
XXXV. 58
1764. April 4. Abrams, Elizabeth, and John Vanderbilt,
66 VIII. 131
1753. Aug. 9. Abrams, Hannah, and John Brewer,.
66
I. 88
1772. Oct. 31. Abramse, Jemima, and Theodosius Bartow,
XIX. 96
1774. Feb. 28. Achmuty, Isabella, and William Burton, .
XXII. 136
1779. Dec. 28. Achyndaey, Alex'r, and Jane Flannegan, .
XXVIII. 183
1764. Oct. 11. Acker, Annatje, and John King,
VIII. 351
1782. Nov. 30. Acker, Anne, and John Foreman,
XXXVII. 100
5
1757. Jan. 21. Aberson, John, and Catharine Van Vie,
1760. Nov. 17. Abeel, Garret, and Mary Byvanck,
2
NEW YORK MARRIAGES.
DATE. NAMES. RECORD.
VOL. PAGE.
1765. April 17. Acker, Catharine, and Peter Van Tassell, . M. B.,
IX. 101
1762. June 17. Acker, Helen, and Walter Hyer, . VI. 194
1758. June 3. Acker, Jane, and Daniel Scidmore,
I. 924
1783. Sept. 3. Acker, Mary, and John Myer,.
XL. 20
1757. Dec. 28. Ackerly, Robert, and Sarah Smith,. I. 756
1781. April 19. Ackerman, Ann, and Abram Maybee,.
XXXII.
8
1764. Mar. 23. Ackerman, Catharine, and Nicholas Moore, ...
VIII. 115
1765. June 27. Ackerman, Catharine, and Walter De Grauw,.
66
IX. 1.85
1679. Mar. 13. Ackerman, David, Helligond Ver Planck, . .
G. E., XXXII. 72
1769. Mar. 22. Ackerman, Edward, and Susannah Bertine, . . . M. B., XIV. 58
1778. Sept. 10. Ackerman, John, and Mary Beekman,
XXVI. 23
1781. Oct. 5. Ackerman, John, and Annautia Baldwin,
XV.
73
1765. April 17. Ackerman, Maritje, and Elbert Onderdonck, ..
IX 100
1760. Mar. 7. Ackerman, Simon, and Catherine Bowman, ...
III. 68
1769. April 20. Ackerman, Susannah, and Peter Tobin,
XIV. 78
1760. July 14. Ackerson, Dennes, and Lenea Slingerland,
III. 213
1779. June 24. Ackerson, John, and Abigail Olnes, .
XXVIII.
7
1783. Sept. 20. Ackesen, Thomas, and Hannah Retton,
XL. 46
1771. Dec. 28. Acklay, Elizabeth, and Daniel Lawrance,
XVII. 305
1755. Aug. 16. Ackle, William, and Mary Newton,
66
149
1775. June 28. Ackley, Ann, and Richard Spencer,
66
XXIII. 81
1783. Nov. 2. Ackley, Daniel, and Mary Harriss, .
XL. 102
1770. Aug. 23. Ackley, Elizabeth, and Robert Struthan,
66
XVI. 169
1782. June 27. Ackley, Susannah, and Dennis Post, .
XXXVI. 64
1757. May 16. Aclay, Deborah, and William Sands, .
I. 534
1781. Jan. 12. Acres, Thomas, and Mary Hustick ( Husten ),
XXXI. 20
1783. April 28. Adam, William, and Ally Devoor, ..
XXXVIII. 105
1779. July 8. Adams, Catherine, and John Mitchell,
XXVIII. 18
1763. Oct. 29. Adams, John, and Charity Smith, .
ור
VII. 412
1736. May 14. Adams, Jonas, and Elizabeth Saxton,
I. 1
1780. Sept. 29. Adams, James, and Eunice Harned,
66
XVII. 68
1771. April 25. Adams, John, and Sarah Wheeler,
XXIII. 132
1775. Aug. 21. Adams, John, and Mary Con, .
1766. Nov. 25. Adams, Mary, and John Van Vorst,
x. 182
1763. Nov. 21. Adams, Phebe, and Simon Reeves,
VII. 460
· 1762. May 27. Adams, Sarah, and William Turner, VI. 170
VII. 33
1759. June 6. Adams, William, and Susana Van Maple, ... II. 304 66
1762. Jan. 25. Adams, William, and Jane Jienson, .
VII.
34
1760. Sept. 4. Addy, Jennet, and David Rottery, . III. 282
1770. April 14. Adems, John, and Susanah B. Rogers, .
XVI. 62
1757. June 10. Adleton, Abigail, and Alexander Auxburgh,
I. 559
66 XVII. 103
1759. July 17. Adams, Elizabeth, and Thomas Liscomb,.
II. 358
1771. June 7. Adams, John, and Hannah Bradburn,
XXX. 47
1762. Jan. 24. Adams, Susanna, and William Morris, 66
XXXIII. 89
1769. Nov. 1. Ackerman, Leah, and Benjamin Allison, . . .
3
NEW YORK MARRIAGES.
DATE.
NAMES. RECORD.
VOL. PAGE.
1773. May 22. Adriaanse, Caroline, and Charles Platt, ..... M. B.,
XX 121
1773. Oct. 8. Adriaanse, Cornelius, and Aaltje Swartwout,
XXI. 133
1771. Aug. 21. Adriaense, Elbert, and Sarah Brinckerhoff,. . 66
XVII. 161
1768. May 30. Adriance, Albert, and Hannah Platt, . .
XIII. 119
1766. Sept. 2. Adriance, Fametie, and Thomas Langdon, ..
x. 89
1761. Jan. 14. Adriance, Jacob, and Catherine Hoglandt, .. 66
IV. 16
1782. Nov. 23. Adriance, Jane, and Cornelius Van Brunt, ..
XXXVII. 92
1772. Nov. 24. Adriance, John, and Aneltie Storm,.
66 XIX.
127
1764. May 11. Adrianse, Isaac, and Eda Schenck,
VIII. 188
1755. Nov. 27. Adrianse, Rem, and Jannetie Van Clief, . . .
66
. 218
1759. Nov. 21. Adrianse, Rem, and Elizabeth Ryder,.
66
II. 510
1764. Aug. 13. Aerhart, Christopher, and Hyler Dey, .
66
VIII. 279
1760. Nov. 20. Agen, Timothy, and Elizabeth McGeer,.
III. 428
1777. Nov. 8. Aget, Agness, and Thomas Smith,.
66
XIV. 178
1762. April 8. Agnew, Abigail, and Caleb Hyatt,.
VI.
93
1777. Dec. 29. Ahern, Bridget, and Nathaniel Phillipse, ....
XXIV. 209
1773. Aug. 5. Aights, Catherine, and Henry Van Woert, ..
66
XXXVIII.
108
1773. July 28. Aim, Martin, and Elinor Harding,
66
XXI.
52
1782. Oct. 17. Aime, Margaret, and Robert Scott,
66
XXVII.
14
1778. Feb. 10. Airs, Joseph, and Charity Whetten,
66
XXV.
21
1782. Jan. 17. Airy, Hannah, and Barnard Marling,
66
XXXV.
21
1779. Jan. 20. Aitkenhead, John, and Ann Hamilton, ..
XXVII. 21
1771. Aug. 19. Aitkins, Charles, and Cornelia Beekman,
XVII.
159
1768. Jan. 28. Aitun, Robert, and Margaret Ladd,
66
XIII. 19
1759. Dec. 12. Akely, Elizabeth, and John Stocker,.
II. 541
1772. Mar. 7. Akerly, Jacamiah, and Susannah Dodge, ....
XVIII.
51
1781. Sept. 5. Akerly, Johanah, and Daniel Pine,.
XXXIII.
59
1770. April 27. Akerly, Rebecca, and Jacob Sammons,
XVI.
71
1775. Dec. 12. Akin, Abigail, and John Toffey,
66
228
1781. Oct. 16. Akin, Justice, and Elizabeth Briggs,
66
103
1780. April 15. Akinson, John, and Ann McCord, .
66
XXIX.
25
1764. Nov. 15. Alberson, Rachel, and Abraham Hill,
VIII.
411
1760. June 24. Alberson, Sarah, and Obadiah Green,
III. 195
1761. Mar. 14. Albertson, Albert, and Phebe Pierce,.
IV. 102
1772. June 23. Albertson, Deliverance, and Robert Hinchman,
66
XVIII. 148
1778. Dec. 19. Albertson, Jemima, and John Frazer, .
XXVI. 126
1780. Oct. 7. Albertson, William, and Sarah Concklin, 66
XXX. 59
1762. July 31. Albertus, Antje, and Richard Gosline, .
VI. 258
1762. Sept. 21. Albertus, Phebe, and Thomas Sacket,
VI. 324
1772. Sept. 29. Albouy, John, and Catherine Blouw,
66
XIX. 63
1779. June 4. Albouy, Richard, and Mary Lave, .
66 XXVII. 158
1768. Sept. 20. Albouy, Jane, and John De Forrest, .
66 XIII. 191
1767. July 17. Albouy, Martha, and Bernard De Forrest, ...
XI. 136
וו XXXVII.
44
1779. Jan. 14. Ainsly, Mary, and Edward Burke,
XXI. 57
1783. April 22. Aikins, John, and Mary Brooks, .
16
4
NEW YORK MARRIAGES.
DATE. NAMES. RECORD.
VOL. PAGE.
1762. Dec. 21. Albouy, Richard, and Sarah Brewerton, ....
M. B.,
VI. 492
1756. Sept. 6. Albrespy, William, and Hannah Bourdet, ...
66
I. 290
1769. Mar. 25. Alburtis, Peter, and Catherine Van Ander, ..
XIV. 60
1773. July 22. Alburtus, Peter, and Martha Denton,.
XXI. 49
1777. April 12. Aldsworth, John, and Jane Johnson, .
XXIV. 60
1772. Mar. 5. Alexander, Robert, and Jane Willett,
XVIII. 49
1760. Feb. 19. Alford, Margaret, and John Clarke,
66
III.
41
1768. Oct. 10. Alington, Arthur, and Marah Lewis,.
66
XIII.
206
1780. Nov. 6. Allaire, Peter A., and Frances Wilmot, .
XXX. 92
1779. Jan. 7. Allamand, Jonas H., and Mary De Graw,. . .
XXVII. 4
1779. July 7. Allaway, Susanah, and George Person,
XXVIII.
17
1777. June 18. Allboy, Sarah, and Isaac Collins,
66
XXIV. 105
1756. Aug. 27. Allee, Peter, and Abigail Borright,
I. 279
1753. June 6. Allen, Abraham, and Sarah Outwater,
I. 50
1775. May 12. Allen, Agnes, and John Williams,
XXIII.
31
1782. Mar. 11. Allen, Agnes, and Jacob Brower,
XXXV. 86
1780. April 13. Allen, Ann, and Silas Powel,.
XXIX. 22
1773. Nov. 4. Allen, David, and Nancy Kissam,
XXII.
12
1777. Oct. 14. Allen, Elijah, and Sarah Kissam,
XXIV. 162
1782. Feb. 2. Allen, Elizabeth, and John Hurly, .
XXXV. 42
1773. Oct. 28. Allen, Hannah, and Nathaniel Shaler,
XXII.
3
1762. Dec. 14. Allen, Henry, and Elizabeth Smith,
66
VI. 479
1761. Aug. 22. Allen, Jacamiah, and Rachel Hendricks, 60
V. 52
1781. Dec. 13. Allen, James, and Mary Burtis,
XXXIV. 82
1777. July 30. Allen, Jane, and John Welsh,
XXIV. 125
1767. Feb. 14. Allen, Jerusha, and Amos Powell,
XI.
26
1757. April 23. Allen, John, and Elizabeth Annely, 1. 512 66
66
II. 69
1770. Dec. 3. Allen, John, and Ann May Daniel,
XVI. 280
1779. April 20. Allen, John, and Ruth Smith,
XXVII. 110
1782. May 2. Allen, John, and Susannah Quackenbush, .
145
1783. June 5. Allen, John, and Rebecca Wallace, 66
XXXIX. 40
1763. Nov. 29. Allen, Joseph, and Mary Forster,.
VII. 482
1758. Dec. 6. Allen, Lettetia, and Benjamin Seamans, ....
п. 117
1760. Nov. 12. Allen, Margaret, and Winant Bennett, .
66
III. 405
1764. June 1. Allen, Margaret, and Johannes Rosekrans,. .
VIII. 203
1759. June 9. Allen, Mary, and William Luckett,
II. 316
1759. Sept. 12. Allen, Mary, and Luke Clarke,
II. 417
1759. Sept. 28. Allen, Mary, and Peter De Maree, п. 436 66
1762. Nov. 9. Allen, Mary, and John Green,
VI. 420
1765. Aug. 29. Allen, Mary, and Thomas Robelee, IX. 251 66
XV. 77
1773. Dec. 20, Allen, Mary, and Zacharias Flegla, .
XXII. 79
1759. Nov. 3. Allen, Meriby, and Samuel Townsend, . 66
II. 487
1770. Dec. 29. Allen, Nathaniel, and Catherine Lisk, .
XVI. 309
1769. Nov. 3. Allen, Mary, and John Thorne, .
66
1758. Oct. 26. Allen, John, and Sovenah Miring,
5
NEW YORK MARRIAGES.
DATE. NAMES. RECORD.
VOL. PAGE.
1779. Oct. 23. Allen, Nehemiah, and Mary Pearsall,
M. B.,
XXVIII. 118
1761. Aug. 20. Allen, Patrick, and Mary Young,
v. 49
1782. Aug. 24. Allen, Peter, and Phebe Coole,.
XXXVI. 123 9
1769. Jan. 9. Allen, Phebe, and Joseph Thorne,.
XIV.
1769. Mar. 6. Allen, Phebe, and Nathaniel Jarvis, 66
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.