USA > New York > Records of the Reformed Dutch Church in New Amsterdam and New York : marriages from 11 December, 1639, to 26 August, 1801 > Part 2
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32
And still another irregularity arising, in 1658 the following law was enacted :
ORDINANCE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL AND COUNCIL OF NEW NETH- ERLAND TO OBLIGE PARTIES TO MARRY AFTER THE PUBLICATION OF THEIR BANS. Passed 15 January, 1658.
Iferras the Director General and Council of New Netherland not only are informed, but have even seen and remarked, that some persons, after the proclamation and publication, for the third time, of their Bans or Inten- tions of Marriage, do not proceed further with the solemnization of their Marriage as they ought, but postpone it from time to time, not only weeks, but some months, which is directly contrary to, and in contravention of the good order and custom of our Fatherland, wherein being willing to provide in order to prevent the mischiefs and irregularities which will flow there- from ;
Therefore the Director General and Council aforesaid do hereby ordain that all published persons, after three Proclamations have been made and no lawful impediment occurs, shall cause their Marriages to be solemnized within one month, at furthest, after the last Proclamation, or within that time, appear and show cause where they ought, for refusing; and that on pain of forfeiting Ten guilders for the first week after the expiration of the aforesaid month, and for the succeeding weeks 20 guilders for each week, until they have made known the reason for refusing.2
The enforcement of these ordinances, owing to the cosmopolitan charac- ter of the inhabitants, was beset with many difficulties; but passing these by, let us ascertain who it was that solemnized the marriages which occurred during the period before mentioned. A strong point in the movement of the Reformation in the sixteenth century was the substitution of the civil for the ecclesiastical ceremonies of Marriage. Especially did the Puritans who sought refuge in Holland declaim against the performance of marriage ceremonies by priests, as usurpations of the rights of the State, by the Church, and also as savoring of the Papistic belief in the sacramental char-
Commentaries on Roman Dutch Lacu. Translated from the Dutch [edition 1578]. Revised and edited by C. W. Decker. 8vo. 2 volumes. London : 1881. Vol. i, p. 103.
2 Laws and Ordinances of New Nether- land, etc. By E. B. O'Callaghan. Albany : IS6S. P. 328.
ix
acter of the relation. We have seen that the custom of the United Nether- lands was for its performance by a magistrate. The earliest instance of such, in these parts, was that of the second marriage of Governor EDWARD WINS- Low, in Plymouth Colony, in 1621.
Governor WILLIAM BRADFORD, of Plymouth Colony, says,' under date of May 12 [1621], " was y" first mariage in this place [ Edward Winslow to Susan- nah White, widow of William White who died on the twenty-first of Feb- ruary, 1621] which, according to ye laudable Custome of ye Low-Cuntries in which they had lived, was thought most requisite to be performed by the magistrate, as being a civill thing, upon which many questions aboute in- heritance doe depend, with other things most proper to their cognizans, aud most Consonante to ye Scripturs, Ruth 4, and no wher found in ye gospell to be layed on ye ministers as a part of their office. 'This decree of law about mariage was published by ye Stats of ye Low-Cuntries Anº 1590. That those of any religion, after lawfull and open publieation, eoming before ye magistrats in ye Town or Stat-house, were to be orderly (by them) maried one to another.' Pelets Hist., fol. 1029."? And practiss hath continued among, not only them but hath ben followed by all ye famous Churches of Christ in these parts to this time Anº 1646.
EDWARD WINSLOW who was first married in Leyden on 16th May, 1618, and whowas Governor of Plymouth Colony in 1633, in bis examination before the commission over which Archbishop Laud presided, to inquire into the troubles in Plymouth and Massachusetts Colonies says, "that having been ealled to place of magistracie he had married some, and further told their lordps yt marriage was a eiville thinge, & he found no wher in ye word of God y: it was tyed to ministre. Again, they were necessitated so to doe, having for a long time together at first no minister ; besides it was no new- thing, for he had been so maried himself in Holland by ye magistrats in their Statt-house." 3 The necessity here mentioned, we have seen, existed in like manner in the early settlement of New Netherland.
In 1641 Governor RICHARD BELLINGHAM, who was the last surviving pat- entee of the Colony, married himself to PENELOPE PELHAM, without publiea- tion of bans, notwithstanding the Statute of 1639 of the Colony declared that the intentions of the parties should be published three times, in as many days, where the parties lived. "The great inquest presented him for breach of the order of the Court, and at the Court following, in the 4th month, the Secretary ealled him to answer the prosecution. But he not going off the bench, as the manner was, and but few of the magistrates present, put it off to another time, intending to speak with him privately, and with the other
History of Plymouth Plantation, by William Bradford . . Boston : 1856. P. IO !.
: La Grande Chronique Ancienne et Moderne, de Hollande, Zelande, Westfriese,
Utrecht, etc., by Jean François le Petit, 1601 and 1611.
3 History of Plymouth Plantation by William Bradford, the Second Governor of the Colony. . . . Boston : 1856. P. 330.
magistrates about the Case, and accordingly he told him the reason why le did not proceede, viz .: being unwilling to command him to go off the bench, and yet not thinking it fit he should sit as a judge, when he was by law to answer as an offender. This he took ill, and said he would not go off the bench, except he were commanded." 1
And still again we find where it is said : On the fourth of August, 1647, "there was a great marriage to be solemnized in Boston. The bridegroom being of Hingham, Mr. Hubbard's church, he was procured to preach and came to Boston to that end. But the magistrates, hearing of it, sent to him to forbear. The reasons were: first, for that his spirit had been dis- covered to be adverse to our ecclesiastical and civil government, and he was a bold man, and would speak his mind; second, we were not willing to bring in the English custom of ministers performing the solemnity of marriage." 2
It was not till 1692 that the Massachusetts Province laws provided that the marriage ceremonies might be performed by ministers.3
The earliest recorded instance of a marriage contract found in the Colo- nial Annals of this State is that of JAN JACOBSEN and MARITJE PIETERS, found in the New York Colonial MManuscripts, vol. i., page 153, for the translation of which we are indebted to the courtesy of Mr. George R. Howell, the present Archivist of the State, and which we here present. It bears date, fifteenth of August, 1639.
IN the name of God, amen, Be it known unto all men that on the 15th August in the year 1639, before me Cornelis van Tienhoven, Secretary residing in New Netherland on the behalf of the Incorporated West India Company, and the undersigned witnesses, appeared the worthy Jan Jacobsen front Vrelant, future bridegroom assisted by Maritje Peters from Copen- hagen, his future bride, on the other part, and they the appearers declared that they had mutually resolved, engaged and agreed to enter together the holy state of matrimony, and that under the following nuptial contract, praying the Almighty God that his divine Majesty would be pleased to bless their future marriage and let it redound to his honor.
First, in regard to the property which he, the bridegroom, shall leave behind, in case he come to die, whether movable or immovable, or such as may rightfully belong to him, it shall belong in free propriety to Marritje Peters aforesaid, without any of Jan Jacobsen's blood relations having any claim thereto. On the other hand, if Marritje Peters, the future bride, first happen to die, Jan Jacobsen shall, in like manner, own all her means and goods, whether movable or immovable, in free propriety, without his giving any account thereof to any of her blood relations. Provided always that he, the bridegroom, or she, the bride, aforesaid, which
1 The History of New England from 1630 to 1539. By John Winthrop. With notes by James Savage. Boston: 1853. Vol. ii., pp. 51-52.
3 The Pilgrim Republic: an Historical Review of the Colony of Plymouth. By John A. Goodwin. 596. Boston : ICSS. P. 2 ibid., p. 382.
----
xi
ever of them both come to live the longest, shall not possess the property longer than to the day of his or her death, and then be partitioned and divided by the brothers or lawful heirs of him, the bridegroom, and Teuntje Jewriaens of Amsterdam, or Jacob Bronc, her present husband, as heirs of Maritje Pieters aforesaid, each the just half.
Thus done and executed in the presence of the undersigned witnesses in Fort Amsterdam, this day and year aforesaid.
This is the + mark of Jan Jacobsen above named. This is the M mark of . Marritje Peters above named. Claes van Elslant, witness. Harmanus A. Booghardij, witness.
The earliest recorded marriage, and which antedates the Records of the Dutch Church in New York, is that of THOMAS DE CONINC and MARRITJE FRANS VAN BETTS, and bears date 22 Septem., 1639. It will be found in N. Y. Colonial Manuscripts, Vol. iv., p. 50, and is as follows (we give both the original and translation as furnished by Mr. Howell) :
Op 22 Septem [1639].
Ter vergaderinge syn gecompaereert en verscheenen tomas de Coninc en Marritjen frans van beets de welcke versochten wettelyck in houwelycken staet bevesticht te worden.
Soo syn de vooren persoonen op haer versoch op dato in heyligen houwelychen staet bevesticht ter vergaderinge int fort Amst™.
Translation.
Thomas de Coninc and Marritje Frans van Beets appeared in court and requested to be legally united in marriage.
The above named persons were therefore this day at their request united in holy wedlock in court at Fort Amst".
From 1664 to 1683 the Colony of New York was governed by a code known as the Laws of the Duke of York. This code was published at Hemsted, on Long Island, March Ist, Anno Domini 1664. The following is the ordinance relating to Marriages :
1Dherras by the Law of England no Marriage is Lawfully Consum- mated without a Minister whose office it is to join the parties in Matrimony after the Banes thrice published in the Church or a Lycence first had and obtained from some person thereunto Authorized, All which formality can- not be duly practiced in these parts.
Yet to the end that a decent rule therein may be preserved It is Ordained that from henceforth the names and surnames of each Party who sue for Marriage shall be publiquely read in their Parish Church or place of usuall Meeting, where they both then Inhabit three severall Lords days Successively.
xii
And where no Church or Meeting place shall happen to bee, a publica- tion in writing shall be first fourteen Days before Marriage upon three doors of each parish whereof the partyes inhabit (viz.) one on the Constables the other two upon any two Doors of the Overseers of the Parrish Unless they produce a Lycence from the Governour in both which Cases, and not otherwise, it shall be Lawfull for any Minister or for any Justice of Peace to joync the Parties in Marriage, Provided that the said Partyes do purge themselves by Oath before the Minister or Justice that they are not under the Bonds of Matrimony to any other Person Living, and if it shall be proved, that either or both of the Partics are perjured, and thereby attain a Double Marriage for the said perjury the party or parties offending shall be boared through the tongue with a red hot Iron and moreover proceeded against as in Case of Adultery is provided ; But if either Party be approved Innocent as to him or her Self and Ignorant of the others wicked fraud the innocent Person shall recover damage against the nocent ; and be Sett at Liberty as if no such Marriage had been made.'
We find numerous cases recorded in the published Colonial Documents of this State, which illustrate particular deviations from the Customs and Laws in force at various periods, but the limited space at our command prevents their citation.
The Marriage and Baptismal Records of the Reformed Dutch Church in New York are at the present time in the custody of the Consistory of the Collegiate Church. As we now find them, they are a copy to 1682 of a previous record, not now known to exist, made by Domine Henricus Selyns, probably soon after his second installment as minister of the church in 16S2. These Records, to a certain extent, are admitted as evidence in courts of this country ? and in England.3 In the case of Jackson vs. King, 5 COWEN, 236, sworn copies of entries of baptisms and marriages in the Records of the Reformed Dutch Church in the city of New York, were admitted to prove those facts -- see 5 PETERS, 470; 6 BINNEY, 416; so in the Lauderdale Peerage Claim, tried in the House of Lords of England, in 1885, sworn copies of these records were offered by learned counsel, from this city, and were admitted in evidence.
The expense of the transcript from which these Records are printed was defrayed by the late Stephen Whitney Phoenix, whose love for the city of his birth was only equaled by his noble generosity. It is to his memory that this volume is dedicated.
I Collections of the New York Historical Society for the Year 1809. Vol. i, New York : 1811, pp. 361 and 362.
2 A Treatise on the Law of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States. By Murray Hoffman, Esq. New York : 1850. P. 287.
3 Blue Book, House of Lords, Minutes of Evidence taken before the Committee for Prze . leges of the Lauderdale Peruge Claim, ordered to be Printed 18 June, 1855, p. 287.
-
HET GETAL DER NAVOLGDE GETROUWDEN.
Heb. xiij. v. 4:
HET HOUWELYCK IS EERLYCK ONDER ALLEN, EN HET BEDDE ONBEVLECKT: MAER D'HOERFERDERS EN OVERSPEELDERS SAL GODT STRAFFEN EN OOR- DLELEN
[TRANSLATION. ] THE NUMBER OF THE HEREIN FOLLOWING MARRIED PERSONS. Heb. xiii. v. ::
MARRIAGE IS HONORABLE IN ALL, AND THE BED UNDEFILED; BUT WHORE- MONGERS AND ADULTERERS GOD WILL JUDGE.
PAER .*
PAER.
1630.
р.
2
21
1640.
p.
1671. 1672.
p. P.
18
1641.
p.
p.
22
1673. 1674- 1675. 1676. 1677. 1678. 1679. 16So. $681. 16S2.
P. 21
1642.
p. 21
1643.
32
1644.
p. p.
8 15
15 6 12
16
26
1651.
27
1652. 1653. 1654.
P. P. p.
14 25 26
14 1685. I686. 1687. 1688. 1689. 1690. 1691. 1692. 1693. 1694.
P.
26
P.
P.
20
P. P.
p. 36 25 24 19
1662. 1663.
1664.
P.
37
1665. 1666. 1667.
P.
26 29 19 14
1695. 1695. 1697. 1698. 1699. 1700. 1701.
p.
30
1668.
p.
15 12
1669.
p.
1670.
14
1702.
Getrouwde personen.
P. P. p. P. P. P. D. P. p.
20 36 35
1655- 1656. 1657. 1658. 1659. 1660. 1661.
P.
19 41
p.
P. 31
33
p.
19 22
p. D.
33
p.
45
p.
27
P.
10
3 : 1683. 1684.
p. 14 p. D. 19 I.Q 23 21
1646.
P.
р.
1647. 1648.
1649.
1).
19
1650.
p.
22
1645.
D. 13 IT
39
p. P.
P.
535 paer. : *Couples.
[571]
TROUW BOECK Oft Register der PERSONEN
die Hier ingeschreven, en Hier of buyten dese Stadt New-Yorke Getrouwt zyn. Van den II dec., 1639, totten 15 May, 1652.
[TRANSLATION.) MARRIAGE BOOK OR THE REGISTER OF THE PERSONS WHO ARE HEREIN RECORDED, AND WHO WERE MARRIED HERE OR OUTSIDE THE CITY OF NEW YORK. - From the IIth Dec., 1639. to the 13th May, 1652.
Aº 1639.
den Il Decemb. Egbert Van Borsum, j. m.# Van Embden, en Annetje Hendricks, j. d.f Van Amsterdam.
den IS dicto. Borger Joriszen, j. m. Van Hersberg, in Silesien, er Engeltje Mans, j. d. Van Coinpste, in Sweden.
Aº 1640.
den ix Febr. Theunis Nyssen, j. m. Van Bunninck, in't sticht Van Újtř. en Phaebea Faclix, j. d. Van Jarleston, in den 26 Aug. Engelt. Paulus Janszen, Van Vlissingen. Wedr.į Van Neeltje Corn. en Tijntje Herens, j. d. Van Jenepeeren.
den , 6 Sept. den 4 Novemb.
Thomas Sander, j. in. Van Amsterdam, en Sara Van Gorcom. Roelant, Hackwart, j. m. Van Brandtfort in Schotlant, en Jauncken Jans. j. d. Van Amsterdam. , Michiel Paúltis. j. m. Van dermonde in Vlaenderen, en Maria Rappalje, j. d. Van N. Nederl.
den i8 dicto.
[572] den 2 Decemb,
Pieter Wolfertszen, j. m. Van Amersfoort, en Hester Sim- ons, Van Amsterdam, Wede. § Van Jacques de Vernuis.
Aº 16.11.
den ; May.
den 9 Júne.
den 28 Júl.
Anthony von Angola, Wed' Van Catalina van Angola, ch Lúcie D'Angola Wede van Laurens van Angola. Isaacg de Foreest, j. m. Van Leyden, en Sara du Treux, j. d. van N. Nederl. Albert Pieterszen, j. m. Van Hamburg, en Marritje Pie- ters, j. d. Van Coppenhagen.
Eodem.
den 18 Alúgúst.
Eodem.
Ulderick Cleen, j. m. Úyt | Hessen, en Aefje Pieters, j. d. Van Amsterdam. Laurens Pieters, j. m. Van Tonsbergen, in Noordwegen, en Annette Pieters, j. d. Van Brutsteen, in Duytslant. Jan Harmenszen, j. m. Van Lemmet, in Vriesl, en An- netj .: Pieters, j. d. Van Housen, in Duytslant. "Young man; hot before married. + Young maid not before married. # Widower. § Widow. Il From
10
en ... And
-
.
TROUW BOECK Off Register den
PERSONEN €
Stadt New-Yorke Getrouast zinu . Van den IL dec . 1639 totthim 15 May 1650.
AV. 1639.
Egbert vare borsuisse, fue vars Enstilling, Buon anuoto Gebucht, f. d. van amsterdam .. don Ld dicto, Borgor fourbronn for van goabBorg in Selezion Guerra Engeltje Mand, J.d. van Congofre, die Swati.
Aš 1640. don't four.
IgaBra facin, f.d. var fazlagion, un Erego !! Sonst Lig. Poulet fanfaron, was vikingen, 1000 E vana Dodaje) Com du Injusto Borant, J.d. vain fonoporcins. Bon 1.6 Sept.
2gonnak Sander, farm, var auftexdasson, Estoun · Sara van- gorcum ...
don A Hoverb.
Hollande- Bachwarte, fur van Braucht soir im bogatleusden janauchin fact: 1.0. vous aufond. con ed dista
II
Jen 25 August
" den : Sept.
den 15 dicto.
Barent Janszen, j. m. Van Stockholm, en Styntie Pieters j. d. als voren .*
den 17 Novemb. Thomas Halen, j. m. Van Clocester, en Anna Mitfort Van Bristol, Wed: Van Willem Cuyck.
den 24 dicto.
Jan Fort Orangien, Wed. Van Magdalena Van Angola, en Marie Grande, Wede. Van Jan Premier.
[573] den 22 Dec. Jan Jacobszen Corpenel, j. m. Van Haerlem. en Jacom- j'ntie Mennes, j. d. als voren.
den 28 dicto.
Eodem.
Dirck Janszen, j. m. Van Amsterd. en Jannetje Theunis, j. d. als voren. Oben Reddenhasen, j. m. Úyť't Graefschap Waldeck, en Geertie Nonnincks, Wede. Van Tjerck Hendrickszen.
Aº 1642.
den Eerste Jan. den 16 Febr.
Philip Gerritszen, j. m. Van Haerlem, en Maria Lievens. Emanuel Van Angola, Neger, en Phizithiaen D'Angool, Wede. Van Leen Laurens.
den 26 dicto.
Oloft Stephenszen, j. in. Van Wyck, tot Duurstede, en Anneken Loockermans, j. d. Van Turnhout.
Eodem.
Francisco Van Angola, j. m. en Palassa Van Angola, Wede. Van Francisco d'Angola.
den :3 Mart. den 1 Jún. den 29 dicto.
Abraham Jacobs, j. m. Van Steenwyck, en Geert ufd Willem, j. d. Van Amsterdam.
Willem Barents, Van Westchester, en Maria Ballack, Wede.
Mr. Hans Kierstede, Chirurgyn, j. m. Van Maegden- burg. en Sara Roelofs, i. d. Van Amsterdam, bejde wonende tot N. Amsterdam.t
[574] Fodem. den 3 Júl. den 6 dicto. den 27 dicto.
Gregoriús Cool, j. m. Újt de Provincie Van Essex, en Francoise Deen, j. d. Van Oxfort in Engelant. JE. Pieter Jordaenszen, j. m. Van Lubeck, en Catharina Lisinck. Van Coesvelt, Wede, Van Johan. Barthram. Jillis Pieterszen: j. m. van ter Goude, en Eisje Hendricks, j. d. Van Amsterd.
Sara Brandt, j. m. Uyt de Provincie Van Hertfort, en Rebecca Ratsen, j. d. Van Colchester.
den 24 Aágúst.
Peter Petro Alberto, j. m. Van Venetien, en Judith Jans, j. d. Van Amsterdam.
den laeste dicto. Cornelis Jacobszen, j. m. Van Vreelandt, en Claesje Theunis, j. d. Van Amsterdam.
der 7 Septemb, ' Steven Jong, j. m. Van Oosterschier, en Dorothea Hyls, i. d. Van Kent, Cyt Engel. Anuales Van Angola, Neger, en Anna Van Angola, Wede. Van Francisco Van Capo Verde.
den 28 dicto. * From the same place.
f Both living at New Amsterdam.
.
Hans Schroder, Van Mansvelt, Wed' Van Lysbeth Jans, en Aelije Jans, Wede Van Harmen Jans.
Egbert Wouters, j. m. Van Yselsteyn, en Engel Jan Van Breestede, Wede. Van Jan Janszen.
1 2
den 26 Octob. Egmont Sticke, j. m. Újt de Provincie Van Sútfolck, en Hanna Bellingram, j. d. Uyt de Provincie Van Lincol.
den 2 Novemb.
den 9 dicto.
Thomas Cornelis, j. m. Oft de Provincie Van Hertfort, en Elisabeth Fiscock, j. d. Van Pleymouth in Engel. Michael Buguet, j. m. Van Novan in Vranckryck, en Elizabeth Rosencrans, Wede. Van Vlissingen.
den 16 dicto. Henricus Sibelszen, j. m. Van Langendyck, en Marritje Theunis, j. d. Van Naerden.
[575]
den laesten dicto. Anthony Ferdinand, j. m. Van Cascalis, in Portugal, en Maria Van Angola.
den 7 Decemb.
Jan Fourbus, j. m. Van Westeraes in Sweden, en Mar- gariet Frankens, j. d. Úyt Loster in Engel.
den 21 dicto.
Remmet Janszen, j. m. Van Jeveren. en Janneken Rapalje, j. d. Van N. Nederl.
Aº 16.43.
den 15 Mart.
Wessel Everizen, j. m. Van Naerden, en Geertie Bouw- kens, j. d. als vooren.
den 19 April.
den 17 M.j.
den 14 Jún. den laeste Aúg.
Pieter Collet, j. m. Van Coningsbergen in Prúfsen, en Aeltje Jans. Van Bremen, Wede Van Jan Corn. Van Rotterd.
den I Sept.
Thomas Willet, j. m. Van Bristol in Engel, en Sara Cornell, j. d. Van Essex in Engel.
den 24 dicto.
den 30 Octob.
Gisbert op dyck. j. m. Van Wesel, en Catharina Sinit, j. d. Uyt Oadt Engel. Willem Otkens, j. m. Úyt Engel, en Susanna Sommers, j. d. als voren.
Aº 1644.
den 23 Mart.
James Greves, j. m. Úyt de Provincie Van Hertfort, en Rebecca Jaspers, j. d. Ujt de Provincie Van Búck- ingam.
[576] den 4 Jún. Eodem. den 3 Júl. den ro dicto. -
Ultimo Júl.
Welem Gelder, en Anna Catharyn. Ambrosius Van London, en Maria Goor. Melem Harloo, j. m. Uyt de Provincie Van Middelsaxen, en Elsje Jans, Wede Van Jan Pietersien. Pieter Van der Linden, Wed' Van Elsien Barents, en Martha Ehombeits, Wede Van Jan Monmye. Evert Janszen. j. m. Van Embden, en Súsanna du Trieux, j. d. Van N. Nederì ..
--
-------
Roelof Janszen, j. m. Ujt Noordwegen, en Geertruyd Jacobs. Van Emmenes, Wede. Van Gerr' Janszen. Adriaen Pieterszen, Van Alcmaer, Wede. Van Grietje Pieters, en Elsje Jans, Van Breestede. Huyg Aertsen, Wed. Van Annetje Theunis, en Trintje Harders, Wede. Van Hendrick Holst.
I3
den 21 Aúg. den 4 Sept.
den 9 Octob.
Jan Corly, Van Noortfort, Wed'. Van Philippa Zaals, en Maria Sloofs, Wede Van Jan Sloofs. Wilhem Bredenbent, j. m. Van Ceulen, en Aeltje Bra- conie Wede Van Corn. Lamberts. Paulus Vander Beeck, j. m. Van Bremen, en Maria Thomas, Wede Van Willem de Cúper.
Eodem .. Henry Brezier, j. m. Uft de Provincie. Van Essex, en Susanna Wathens, Wede Van Willem Wathens.
den 23 Oct. den 30 dicto.
Samuel Van Angola, en Catharina de Angola.
Jan Leckwout, Wed Van Anna Winters, en Janneken King, j. d. Van Hertfort.
Henry Peers, j. m. Uyt Oudt Engelandt, en Sara Brout, Wede Van Thomas Hugesson.
den 20 Nov. [577} den 27 dicto. Eodem.
Emanuel de Angola, en Christina de Angola. Anthony de Chongo, en Francisco de Angola.
Aº 1645.
den 12 Febr.
den 26 dieto.
Paulus Heyman, j. m. Van Leyden, en Trintje Barents, Wede Van Claes Driessen. Jeúriaen Fradell, j. m. Uyt Moravien, en Tryn Herxker, Wede Van Hendrick Harmens. Sybolt Claeszen, j. m. Van Hoorn, en Susanna Jans, Wede Van Aert Theuniszen.
den 12 Mart. Eodemn. Tan Haes, Wed Van Elsje Smits, en Janne Schabuels, Wede Van Ed&wart Fiskoech.
Adam Brouwer, j. m. Van Ceulen, en Magdalena Verdon, j. d. Van N. Nederl ..
den 19 dicto. den 23 Júl.
Adriaen Dirckszen, j. m. Van Maerzen, en Martitje Lievens. Wede Van Pheliv Gerritszen.
Thomas Grydy, Wed' Van Janneken Isaacs, en Mary Robbertszen. Wede Van Jan Selis.
Thomas Stephenszen, j. m. Van London, en Maria Ber- nards, Wede Van Willem Bernards.
den 27 Aúg. Elbert Elbertszen, j. in. Van Nietkercken, en Aeltje Cornelis, Wede Van Gerrt Wolfertszeu.
Mr. Adriaen Vanderdock, j. m. Van Breda, en Maria Douthey, j. d. Van Heemstede.
den 22 Octob. den 26 Novemb. Cornelis Corneliszen, j. m. en Aeltje Colet, Wede.
den 4 Decemb. den 24 dicto.
Harmen Smeman, j. m. Ujt't landt Vander Marck, en Elisabeth Everts, Wede Van Barne Dircks. Jan Liecht, Wed' Van Jannetje Conincks, en Elsje Maurits, j. d. Van London.
Aº 1646.
den : Jan. deu 15 April.
Cornelis Maunchem, j. m. Van Leyden, en Christina Pieters, j. d. Van Amsterd. Claes Cartenszen, j. m. Uyt Noordtwegen, en Hilletje Hendricks.
den 9 Aúgúst. den 15 dicto.
14
den 7 May. Gerrit Hendrickszen, j. m. Van Deventer, en Marie Lamberts, j. d. Uft N. Nederl. den 3 Jún. Rúth Jacobszen, j. m. Van Renselaerswyck, en Tryntje Janszen, j. d. Van Breestede.
den 15 Aúg.
1 Lovis Hulet, Wed' Van Wackraet Rutte, en Helena Appelgat. Wede Van Thomas Farrington.
den 28 dicto.
Dirck Corneliszen, j. m. Van Wensveen. en Marritje Janszen, Wede Van Thymes Janszen.
den 9 Septemb. [579]
Evert Duycking, j. m. Van Borken, en Hendrickje Simons, j. d. Van Noordthorn.
den 21 Octob. den 28 dicto.
Francisco d'Angola, en Lucretia Albiecke, Van Angola. Sebastiaen de Britto, Van S' Domingo, en Isabel Kisana, Van Angola.
den 2 Decemb. den ro dicto.
Jan Van Angola, en Philippe Swartinne Van Angola. Pieter Laurenszen, j. m. Van Yselsteyn, en Belitjen Hen- dricks, j. d. Van Amsterdam.
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.