Church of the Brethren in southern Ohio, Part 3

Author: Helman, H. H.
Publication date: 1955-00-00
Publisher: Brethren Publishing House
Number of Pages: 518


USA > Ohio > Church of the Brethren in southern Ohio > Part 3


Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).


Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31


1927


J. O. Garst


1930


J. C. Flora


1929


Edward Miller


1928


1928


I. J. Blocher


1931


J. O. Garst 1930


J. C. Flora 1929


1929


G. E. Yoder


1932


I. G. Blocher


1931


J. O. Garst 1930


1930


E. S. Coffman


1933


G. E. Yoder 1932


I. G. Blocher


1932


Marley Karns


1932


John Kneisly


1932


1931


J. O. Glick 1934


E. S. Coffman 1933


G. E. Yoder 1932


Marley Karns


1932


John Kneisly


1932


1932


G. E. Yoder 1935


J. O. Glick 1934


E. S. Coffman 1933


Marley Karns


1933


John Kneisly


1933


1933


Marley Karns 1938


John H. Good 1937


Harold Stoner 1936


G. E. Yoder 1935


J. O. Glick


1934


1934


Roy Honeyman


1939


Marley Karns


1938


John H. Good


1937


Harold Stoner


1936


J. Perry Prather


1935


1935


J. Perry Prather


1940


Roy Honeyman


1939


Marley Karns


1938


John H. Good


1937


Harold Stoner


1936


1936


Paul W. Kinsel 1943


J. Perry Prather


1940


Roy Honeyman


1939


Marley Karns


1938


John H. Good


1937


1937


John H. Good 1942


Paul W. Kinsel 1941


J. Perry Prather


1940


Roy Honeyman


1939


Marley Karns


1938


1938


Marley Karns 1943


John H. Good 1942


Paul W. Kinsel 1941


J. Perry Prather


1940


Roy Honeyman


1939


1939


E. R. Fisher 1944


Marley Karns 1943


John H. Good 1942


Paul W. Kinsel 1941


J. Perry Prather


1939


41


PART ONE: ORGANIZATIONS AND FUNCTIONS


1940


J. Perry Prather 1945


E. R. Fisher 1944


Marley Karns 1943 E. R. Fisher 1949


John H. Good 1942 Emerson Brumbaugh 1948


Paul W. Kinsel 1941


Paul W. Kinsel


1947


1941


Lester Studebaker 1946


J. Perry Prather 1945


E. R. Fisher


1944


Marley Karns 1943


John H. Good


1942


1947


Dean Frantz 1952


Lowell Erbaugh 1951


W. Glenn McFadden 1950


E. R. Fisher 1949


Emerson Brumbaugh


1948


1942


Paul W. Kinsel 1947


Lester Studebaker 1946


J. Perry Prather 1945


E. R. Fisher 1944


J. L. Baker


1943


1943


Emerson Brumbaugh 1948


Paul W. Kinsel 1947


Lester Studebaker 1946


J. Perry Prather 1945


E. R. Fisher 1944


1944


E. R. Fisher 1949


Emerson Brumbaugh 1948


Paul W. Kinsel


1947


Emerson Brumbaugh 1953


Dean L. Frantz 1952


Ruth Funderburg


1951


1945


W. Glenn McFadden 1950


E. R. Fisher 1949


Emerson Brumbaugh 1948


Paul W. Kinsel 1947


Lester Studebaker 1946


1948


Emerson Brumbaugh . 1953


Dean Frantz 1952


Lowell Erbaugh 1951


W. Glenn McFadden 1950


E. R. Fisher


1949


1949


James H. Beahm 1954


Emerson Brumbaugh 1953


Dean L. Frantz 1952


Ruth Funderburg 1951


W. Glenn McFadden


1950


1950


Kenneth Long 1955


James H. Beahm 1954


Lester Studebaker 1946


J. Perry Prather 1945


1951


Carl Noffsinger 1956


Ruth Funderburg 1955


Kenneth G. Long 1954


J. Clyde Forney 1953


Emerson Brumbaugh 1952


1946


Lowell Erbaugh 1951


W. Glenn McFadden 1950


42


CHURCH OF THE BRETHREN IN SOUTHERN OHIO


DISTRICT CONFERENCES AND OFFICERS


Place and


Moderator


Reader and Secretary 1920


Delegates to Annual Conference


Salem


S. A. Blessing


S. A. Blessing


D. M. Garver


S. Z. Smith


L. A. Bookwalter


1921


Eversole


L. A. Bookwalter


J. W. Fidler


J. W. Fidler


C. L. Flory


D. M. Garver


S. Z. Smith


1922


Painter Creek


J. A. Robinson


S. A. Blessing


S. A. Blessing


D. G. Berkebile


J. A. Robinson


1923


Bear Creek


J. W. Fidler


J. W. Fidler


D. M. Garver


C. L. Flory


D. G. Berkebile


1924


New Carlisle


D. G. Berkebile


J. A. Robinson


J. A. Robinson


R. N. Leatherman


D. G. Berkebile


1925


Poplar Grove


C. L. Flory


J. W. Fidler


J. W. Fidler


D. R. Murray


D. M. Garver


L. A. Bookwalter


1926


Prices Creek


R. N. Leatherman


L. A. Bookwalter


L. A. Bookwalter Ray O. Shank


D. M. Garver


R. N. Leatherman


1927


Trotwood


D. G. Berkebile


C. L. Flory


C. L. Flory


J. H. Eidemiller


D. G. Berkebile


J. W. Fidler


1928


West Alexandria R. N. Leatherman


J. A. Robinson J. W. Fidler


J. A. Robinson


R. N. Leatherman


J. H. Eidemiller


43


PART ONE: ORGANIZATIONS AND FUNCTIONS


1929


Donnels Creek D. G. Berkebile


J. H. Eidemiller


Van B. Wright


J. H. Eidemiller D. G. Berkebile Van B. Wright


1930


Eversole


E. S. Coffman


J. W. Fidler


G. E. Yoder


J. W. Fidler


L. A. Bookwalter


1931


Salem C. L. Flory


L. A. Bookwalter Van B. Wright


1932


Covington


E. S. Coffman


D. G. Berkebile


G. E. Yoder


1933


Brookville


J. O. Glick


C. L. Flory


J. H. Eidemiller


1934


Castine


D. G. Berkebile


J. W. Fidler


J. H. Good


C. L. Flory


J. H. Eidemiller


1935


Oakland J. Perry Prather


R. N. Leatherman H. H. Helman


1936


Georgetown D. G. Berkebile


G. O. Stutsman


J. H. Good


J. H. Good


C. L. Flory


1937


Pitsburg C. L. Flory


H. H. Helman J. H. Good


L. A. Bookwalter C. L. Flory Van B. Wright


D. G. Berkebile


J. W. Fidler


G. E. Yoder


J. H. Eidemiller


C. L. Flory


J. O. Glick


D. G. Berkebile


J. Perry Prather J. W. Fidler


H. H. Helman


G. O. Stutsman


D. G. Berkebile J. W. Fidler H. M. Coppock


G. E. Yoder


44


CHURCH OF THE BRETHREN IN SOUTHERN OHIO


1938


West Milton G. O. Stutsman


J. H. Good


J. H. Eidemiller


J. H. Good


G. O. Stutsman


J. H. Eidemiller


1939


Trotwood


J. W. Fidler


Ray O. Shank J. H. Good


Ray O. Shank Hugh Cloppert D. G. Berkebile


1940


Happy Corner


J. Perry Prather


D. G. Berkebile


H. H. Helman


1941


New Carlisle


Roy B. Teach


Hugh Cloppert


H. H. Helman


1942


Salem


E. R. Fisher


J. Perry Prather H. H. Helman


E. R. Fisher Roy B. Teach H. M. Coppock


1943


Prices Creek


John H. Good


Ray O. Shank


H. H. Helman


H. M. Coppock John H. Good G. L. Wine


1944


West Dayton


Fred Hollingshead


J. W. Fidler


H. H. Helman


1945


Bear Creek W. Glenn McFadden Roy B. Teach


Roy B. Teach


H. H. Helman


J. H. Good W. Glenn McFadden


1946


Donnels Creek Glenn C. Rust


Paul W. Kinsel J. H. Good


Paul W. Kinsel E. R. Fisher W. Glenn McFadden


G. L. Wine H. H. Helman


J. Perry Prather


E. R. Fisher Ray O. Shank J. W. Fidler


Ray O. Shank Fred Hollingshead J. W. Fidler


45


PART ONE: ORGANIZATIONS AND FUNCTIONS


1947


Oakland W. Glenn


McFadden


1948


Pleasant Hill


John Weaver


John H. Good


Lester E. Fike J. H. Good Moyne Landis


1949


Pitsburg Moyne Landis


Dean L. Frantz


Philip H. Lauver


Dean L. Frantz John D. Long Glenn C. Rust


Ass't., John D. Long


1950


Ross Noffsinger Philip H. Lauver


Dean L. Frantz John D. Long Ray O. Shank


1951


New Carlisle Paul W. Kinsel


Kenneth G. Long Philip H. Lauver


Paul W. Kinsel Moyne Landis L. John Weaver


Ass't., Moyne Landis


1952


East Dayton Moyne Landis


J. Oliver Dearing Philip H. Lauver


Nevin Coppock Kenneth G. Long George W. Phillips


Covington J. Clyde Forney Ass't., George W. Phillips


Edward T. Angeny Philip H. Lauver


J. Oliver Dearing Joseph B. Flora J. H. Good


1954


Allen Weldy Roy B. Teach


Foster Bittinger C. G. Erbaugh Homer Royer


West Milton Kenneth Long Ass't., Foster Bittinger


Robert Sherfy J. H. Good


Ray O. Shank Moyne Landis E. R. Fisher


E. R. Fisher


West Milton John D. Long Ass't., Dean L. Frantz


Ass't., L. John Weaver


1953


3. THE ELDERS' BODY


The Elders' Body is the district organization which includes all the ordained elders. Except for some special cause, they are called together once each year, usually in connection with district meeting.


The early practice was to ordain a minister who had first served in the "first degree" and the "second degree" of the ministry. So far as can be determined, no one was ever ordained an elder who had not previously served in the elected or ordained ministry.


The ordination of an elder was, in the earliest practice, to qualify the minister to be the overseer of any church which should choose him as its elder. There seemed to be no noted relation between his ability in the pulpit and his election to the eldership. There seemed to be no attempt to keep the ratio of congregations and elders equal. The number of elders has consistently been greater than the number of congregations. Records of the elders' meetings show that in 1917 sixty-four elders were present and twenty-one absent- nearly double the number of churches. In 1927 fifty-eight were reported present and forty-two absent-again double the number of churches. The practice of recording the number of elders present and absent was discontinued in the early thirties. In 1923 a motion was passed that the wives of elders be invited to be present at the elders' meeting.


The local church had authority to ordain or refuse to ordain a minister to be an elder. The church, through the official board, could suggest the ordination. There has been a growing conviction in the church that there should be demonstration of able leadership before ordination takes place.


At first the elder had, by common consent, very unusual powers. As overseer of a church he had authority which exceeded that of any other member or officer. Yet the inherent


47


PART ONE: ORGANIZATIONS AND FUNCTIONS


democracy of the church caused her to provide safeguards against unwarranted exercise of authority. For instance, in 1873 Annual Meeting provided that an elder could not expel a member or prevent full fellowship of a member in a church without the counsel of the church. In 1896 it also pointed out that no elder could assume oversight of a church except by the choice of the church.


On the other hand, the elder presiding over a church was understood to be responsible for the spiritual condition of the church. If he needed help in difficult situations he could ask it of the adjoining elders, and/or appeal to the Elders' Body. Conflicts between elders in a local church were resolved by the Elders' Body. Annual Meeting has exercised authority over an elder or elders in a local church but never over the Elders' Body of a district.


An elder in a local church seems to have been subject to discipline by the adjoining elders, if out of order. Later this function was exercised by the Elders' Body only, though charges could be brought by the adjoining elders.


In 1865 (Article 41) the Annual Meeting defined procedure in electing an elder. The request is first to be made by the local church and the elders present. Then each member votes individually and secretly. If there is no "serious objection" the ordination is to take place. In 1890 Annual Meeting pro- vided that ordinations should be by authority of the Elders' Body of the district.


With the election of a ministerial board by the district the placing before the Elders' Body of names for ordination came to be the duty of this board. In 1917 Annual Meeting defined both the duties and the qualifications of elders and the duties of the ministerial boards with reference to the ordinations.


Article III. Instruction


3. The duties of the elder, in addition to the foregoing duties of the minister, are to feed the flock, to preside over council meetings, es- pecially when official members are on trial, to anoint the sick, to have the oversight and general management of the church; train- ing the young ministers in his charge and apportioning the work among them according to their experience and ability-in brief, to be a faithful shepherd to the flock, guarding their souls as one


48


CHURCH OF THE BRETHREN IN SOUTHERN OHIO


who must give an account and be willing to serve in any capacity authorized by the church (Acts 20:28; I Tim. 5:17; Titus 1:5; James 5:14).


4. When the minister proves himself faithful and efficient in his of- fice, he shall be ordained elder; and when ordained he shall pledge himself to live and labor in harmony with the accepted standards of the church in faith, doctrine, and practice (I Tim. 5:22; Titus 1:5; I Peter 5:3).


5. The duties of the minister to the church and in general also the duties of the church to the minister, shall be clearly set forth in a special sermon at the time of installation and ordination.


Article V. Management. (Duties of Ministerial Board)


5. To co-operate with churches in securing elders and pastors, and in severing these relations; also with elders, ministers and pastors in changing location. The Ministerial Boards, however, shall not be intrusive, acting with arbitrary authority; they shall be helpful.


6. To keep a record of the churches that desire elders and pastors, and also the names of elders, ministers, and pastors who desire change of location and work.


In this district requests for ordination were regulated by the report of a committee, appointed in 1923, to study the matter and report the next year. The report is contained in the minutes of the 1924 elders' meeting:


The Committee appointed by Elders' Meeting of 1923 beg to sub- mit the following report on initial steps for ordination of elders:


We recommend, that in organized churches, the official board be consulted; if a majority favor the actions, then with the approval of the adjoining elders and the Ministerial Board of the District, the re- quest may be presented to the annual Elders' Meeting.


The report was accepted.


In 1931 the elders' meeting decided that calls for ordina- tions should be in the hands of the District Ministerial Board by April 1 preceding the elders' meeting. (The elders' meeting is now held in the fall.) The Ministerial Board is replaced by that part of the District Board known as the Commission on Ministry, Missions and Church Extension.


The Elders' Body was apparently a development of the Standing Committee idea. The first district meetings held in Southern Ohio composed a standing committee from the elders present. Later when stated delegates represented the churches at the district meetings the function of the elders became that of pre-examining and advising on the queries


49


PART ONE: ORGANIZATIONS AND FUNCTIONS


presented. The practice of churches sending elected delegates to district meetings was provided by an Annual Meeting decision of 1866: "These meetings shall be formed by one or two representatives from each organized church." So the elders then came to have an organization of their own. The date of the beginning of this practice in Southern Ohio is not known. The Elders' Body was recognized by Annual Meeting in 1890 when it decided that the majority of the elders in the elders' meeting should concur in the ordination of an elder. Thus the elders came to control the character and members of their body.


Besides acting in the capacity of a standing committee the Elders' Body also acted as the nominating committee for officers of district meeting and members of boards and com- mittees. Vacancies on boards occurring between district meetings were also filled by the elders. The elders also received, reviewed, and acted upon matters presented by a district board. In 1915 the Southern Ohio Mission Board took a problem to the elders which was answered by action of the Elders' Body. In that same year an Annual Meeting committee, sent to deal with a problem arising in a local church in the district, asked the elders of Southern Ohio to appoint two from their body to assist in the problem. The district elders also referred local church problems to Standing Committee if conditions seemed to warrant it. The district elders could and did also refer difficulties to a district board, particularly to the Mission Board or the Ministerial Board, and also to the adjoining elders.


An unusual action of the Elders' Body in 1916 was the recommendation to the General Mission Board of a member (Elizabeth Weybright Oberholtzer) living in the district as a missionary to the China field.


It is noted also that the Elders' Body acted upon the dissolution of churches no longer active.


In 1920 the elders' meeting decided that the retiring moderator "continue to deliver an address to the elders." Later the guest speaker for district conference did this. Then the moderator-elect as at present. The record of the elders' meeting of 1930 shows that "the annual sermon to the elders


Southern Ohio Elders, November 1953


51


PART ONE: ORGANIZATIONS AND FUNCTIONS


was brought by Elder Edward Frantz, editor of the Gospel Messenger."


For many years it was the responsibility of the elders' meeting to appoint the members of the credential committee.


In 1930 the elders' meeting decided to permit delegates to district meeting to be seated if the churches they represented had not paid their full apportionments to the district.


The Elders' Body acts to relieve men of the ministry upon cause.


It has decided when a matter may be proper business for a district meeting.


In 1947 the district conference asked the Elders' Body to nominate persons for district officers and Standing Com- mitteemen. In 1948 the elders' meeting approved the budget to be presented to district meeting.


In 1951 the Elders' Body appointed one of its members to represent it in a study of the administration and organiza- tion of the district. The report of this committee brought about the organization of the present District Board, and provides that "the composition and function of the Elders' Body are those defined by decisions of Annual Conference of the Church of the Brethren." (See the full report elsewhere.)


A church having difficulties with a pastor, a pastor having difficulties with a church, or a minority group within a church, may appeal their case to the Elders' Body.


The recent change which provides that an overseer (moderator) of a local church may be an able layman or an ordained minister has put these in the same status as an ordained elder, so far as this function is concerned-the function which at first called for ordination of elders. While this recent decision of Annual Meeting does not prevent an ordained elder from functioning as an overseer, it does raise the question now as to the real purpose of his ordination as an elder. This means that there is no difference now in the privilege and function of an ordained elder and an ordained minister except that the latter is not a member of the Elders' Body. However, a lay member who is the moderator of a church may be a member of the Elders' Body. The confusion


52


CHURCH OF THE BRETHREN IN SOUTHERN OHIO


is indicated in a query to Annual Conference of 1952 asking that the functions of an elder be defined. Annual Conference has not yet given a definition.


There are no lay moderators in this district as of now, but at least one church has a layman as assistant moderator.


There is nothing to prevent a pastor being also the elder of his church, or one elder being moderator of more than one church.


The elder is considered a member of the official board of the local church whether he resides in the congregation or not.


A report on trends in the eldership in Southern Ohio made to the elders' meeting in 1953 by Elder Moyne Landis reveals:


1. The moderatorship of our churches is concentrated in a small per- centage of the elders. 35%


2. Many elders have no assigned duties. 65%


3. The moderating of churches is falling into the hands of experienced pastors. 38% full-time; 28% part-time; total 68%.


4. Most of the moderators of Southern Ohio churches are not resident in the churches of which they are moderators.


42 churches, or 78% have non-resident elders.


8 churches, or 13% have resident moderators.


4 churches, or 7% have their pastor as moderator.


There are ninety-three elders in Southern Ohio as of record as this is written. The largest number in one church is five. Eight churches have no resident elders in their membership.


4. CHRISTIAN EDUCATION


Christian education was considered a duty of parents and the home by the early Brethren. Some rather bitterly opposed the establishment of Sunday schools when they were first proposed. The proponents of schools pointed to the large number of Brethren children being lost to the church.


It was perhaps Pleasant Hill (the Newton church then) that organized the first Sunday school in the district soon after 1856. Harris Creek followed a bit later. Covington was reported to have started a school there in 1867. These churches were really pioneers in the Sunday-school movement among the Brethren west of the Ohio River. It soon became popular, and schools were established in most of the churches by the 1900's. The dates of the earlier organization of Sunday schools where available are given:


Church


Date


Superintendent


Pleasant Hill


1857


Covington


1867


Samuel Murray


Lower Miami


1879


John Murray


Oakland


1883


Henry Longanacker


Harris Creek


1885


Jonas Miller


New Carlisle


1886


B. F. Filbrun


Donnels Creek


1886


Wolf Creek


1886 to 1910, then became Brookville and Eversole


Salem


1887


John H. Brumbaugh


Prices Creek


1888


Joseph Longanacker


Union City


1888


Elam Forror


The record book of one of these schools shows that on July 14, 1889, the attendance was nine and the offering eight cents. The offerings for three months of that year totaled $3.82. This is now one of the district's larger Sunday schools. Typical of the methods by which a school was organized


54


CHURCH OF THE BRETHREN IN SOUTHERN OHIO


is the experience of the Ludlow congregation, recorded in the history of the Painter Creek church published in 1941:


In 1887 the pressure to organize a Sunday School in our Ludlow congregation was brought before the council meeting and discussed pro and con. Elder Wm. Boogs of Covington, Ohio was present and encouraged the movement. When a vote was taken it was found that a majority favored organizing a Sunday School for the summer months at the Pitsburg house. Silas Gilbert and E. B. Bagwell were elected superintendents. There was no equipment and the selection of teach- ers was a big task. No one had any experience as a Bible teacher or Sunday School officer. From the best talent available in the Pitsburg and Painter Creek areas the teachers were selected. The lessons were to be taken from the new testament beginning with the first chap- ter of Matthew and taken in consecutive order. The publication of the Brethren's Quarterly was begun two years previous in 1885. Some of the older Brethren advised against the use of international lessons and printed lesson helps fearing some questionable doctrine might be presented. No public offering was to be taken as it was considered wrong to handle money in God's house. For a while Sunday Schools were held only in the afternoon. Later permission was given to have the school in the morning before the preaching service. The enrollment the first summer was 300, average attendance 119. On September 25th, the Sunday School was closed for the winter months. Roads were usually bad during the winter and closed buggies were not in general use. In the spring of 1888 and again in the spring of 1889 the Sunday School was reorganized each year with an increased attendance with practically the same teaching force. John Neher was elected as Superintendent. While the school grew in attendance and efficiency it was closed when winter came.


The schools were soon moving toward teacher training. Weekly teachers' meetings were held between Sundays and someone proceeded to lead the group on how to teach the lessons. From considering the current lessons it became a kind of normal class, discussing teaching methods and materials in general.


Then someone conceived the idea of a district-wide training program, and the Sidney church asked district meeting of 1899 "to grant the holding of a Sunday School meeting somewhere in the district; and appoint a committee of five members, (Sunday School workers) to arrange for a program of said Sunday School meeting." The meeting granted the request and in the appointment of a committee of five designated one to serve as Sunday-school secretary for five


55


PART ONE: ORGANIZATIONS AND FUNCTIONS


years. Appointed was Levi Minnich, who thus began a long period of service to the Sunday schools of Southern Ohio. The next year the district meeting decided that the meetings should be continued and also that a ministerial meeting should be held in connection with the Sunday-school meeting. In 1902 the Sunday-school meeting was held at the Salem church. Here Catherine Hollinger and Charles A. Bame discussed The Normal Class. This stimulated the idea that the Sunday- school meeting should be patterned after the teachers' institutes in the public schools. So in 1903 it was decided to have semiannual teachers' institutes, give instruction in the lesson materials and in methods of teaching, in normal work and textbooks which were recommended. However, after one year it was returned to an annual affair with more sessions. It came to be held quite generally in August. A sample program, that of 1909, will enable the reader to understand the import of these institutes:


THE SUNDAY-SCHOOL MEETING To be held at Trotwood, Tuesday and Wednesday August 24 and 25, 1909


Tuesday evening, business session, followed by a sermon, "The Fundamental Needs of the Hour in Sunday-


School Work." D. S. Filbrun


Wednesday, August 25-Forenoon Session, 8 o'clock Devotional Exercises


1. Teacher Training


(a) The Need O. P. Haines


(b) How? Earl Neff


2. The Primary and Intermediate Classes


(a) Their Needs Martha Guenther


(b) Methods Anna Eby


3. How Can the Sunday-School Implant into the Hearts


of our Young People the Bible Doctrines of


(a) Christian Living Herbert Richards


(b) Christian Adornment Fern Morningstar


4. Personal Work in Sunday-School Allen Weimer


5 Is It Nothing to You? Carl Patten


OFFERING-11:30 A.M.


Afternoon Session


56


CHURCH OF THE BRETHREN IN SOUTHERN OHIC


SHORT TALKS FROM OUR MISSIONARY SISTERS


Ida Erbaugh Mina Hollinger Ada Eby


6. Sunday-School as a Missionary Factor-the Relation of the Sunday-School to the Mission Work of the Church John W. Fidler


J. Franklin Brubaker


ROUND TABLE


1. Shall We Affiliate with Township, County and State Sunday- School Associations? Why?




Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.