USA > Tennessee > History of the Evangelical Lutheran Tennessee Synod > Part 1
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org.
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22
ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3 1833 02302 8233
Gc 976.8 H38H
2276044
REYNOLDS HISTORICAL GENEALOGY COLLECTION
Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2016
https://archive.org/details/historyofevangel00henk_0
INDEXEDR.C . G. S. U.
HISTO
OF THE
JUL 2 0 1944
EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN
TENNESSEE SYNOD,
EMBRACING
AN ACCOUNT OF THE CAUSES, WHICH GAVE RISE TO ITS ORGANIZATION ; ITS ORGANIZATION AND NAME ; ITS POSITION AND CONFESSIONAL BASIS; OBJECT OF ITS ORGANIZATION ; WORK, DEVELOPMENT, AND VARIOUS SESSIONS; ITS POLICY ; AND ITS FUTURE.
BY SOCRATES HENKEL, D. D.
GENEALOGICAL SOCIET OF UTAH 27105
NEW MARKET, VA .: HENKEL & CO., PRINTERS AND PUBLISHERS. 1890.
Am. 93
rulci, county Du Ire Library Ft. Wayne inna
2276044
REV. PAUL HENKEL.
DATE MICROFILMED 11 June 85
--. " 7 PROJEC :
C. S.
ROLL :
C.ALL #
XBL4 7-102 1425542 # 42
-
PREFACE.
Some years ago, the author was requested, by the Evangelical Lutherau Tennessee Synod, to prepare, for publication, the history of this Synod. This seemed to be necessary, in order to present the Synod in its true light before the Church and the world. Some years were spent in securing proper data or material for that purpose. Re- course was had to different sources, as, the Minutes of this Syuod aud of other Synods, as well as to some of the most reliable aud intelligent members of the Church, who were present during the trials and cou- flicts which gave rise to its organization, and to other reliable sources. The object was to present the true, historical facts, in a fair, impartial manuer, without any disposition to reflect unnecessarily on any one, or to perpetuate strife or contention. An houest, faithful statement seemed to be necessary in order to perpetuate the facts.
Whatever discrepancies may appear in some portions of this his- tory, in regard to style, punctuation, &c., may be accounted for on the ground, that such portions were quoted in a general way, as they appeared on the records from which they were taken. The differences which appear in the elements and styles of the obituaries, result from the fact, that they are made up, with few exceptions, from the Minutes of Synod and church journals, nearly, in most instances, as their authors presented them.
In the preparation of this work, care was taken to give such facts and matters as are best calculated to promote the highest interests of the Church, aud to give them due prominence in a plain, simple way. Facts and sound principles should be maintained aud perpetuated. Truth is what is needed. There is too much cant, prevarication, and hypocrisy.
This work is now humbly submitted to an inipartial public, to deteriniue how well and faithfully its author has accomplished the object contemplated, with the hope, that it may prove a blessing in the department for which it is iuteuded, and promote the best interests of the Redeemer's Kingdom.
New Market, l'a., 1890.
S. H.
CONTENTS.
CHAPTER I. THE CAUSES WHICH GAVE RISE TO ITS ORGANIZATION.
PA
Doctrinal Position of the Church up to the Close of the Eighteenth Century-Divergencies from the Standards of the Church- Canses which Gave Rise to these Deviations from the Confes- sions-Pietism, Rationalisin, Exaggerated Ideas of Liberty- Condition and Position about the Time of the Organization of the Tennessee Synod .
CHAPTER II. THE ORGANIZATION AND NAME OF THE SYNOD.
The Open Rupture-When, Where, and How-The Leaders- Organization-When, Where, and by Whom-The Name of th Synod-Basis-Regulations .
CHAPTER III. ITS POSITION AND CONFESSIONAL BASIS.
The Augsburg Confession and the Doctrines of the Church-Th Constitution as Revised in 1866-Its Adherence to the Confes sions-The Printing Establishment-Its Publications . . .
CHAPTER IV. THE OBJECT OF ITS ORGANIZATION.
The Restoration of the Church to its Normal Condition in Doctrir and Practice-Its Positive Course-Prosperity of its Work-I. Extension in Varions States
CHAPTER V. ITS WORK AND DEVELOPMENT.
Its Different Sessions-When and Where-Its Different Decades Its Accessions-Baptisms, Confirmations for Each Decade Ordinations-Dismissals-Communications-Reasons for R jecting the General Synod-Its Extension-Contacts with Oth Synods-Position in Regard to Slavery-Organization of Oth Synods out'of its Members and Congregations-Refntation Resolutions Passed Against it-Its Position Relative to Prom
V
CONTENTS.
cuous Communion and Pulpit Fellowship, Secret Societies, and Chiliasm-Its Connection with the United Synod-Its Total Number of Accessions-Baptismis, Confirmations, Ordinations, Applicants, Churches, Ministers-Theological Students-Liter- ary Institutions-Basis of United Synod and Constitution- Obituaries
43
CHAPTER VI. ITS POLICY.
Its Opposition to Mingling of the State and Church-They Should be Kept Separate-Scriptures Present Sufficient Rules for the Church-Denial of the Right of a Majority to Decide Relative to Doctrine or Church Discipline-The Word of God the Only Standard-Synods only Advisory Bodies-The Purview of Syn- ods-Opposition to Incorporating Synod with Civil Anthority- Congregational Treasuries-The Power in the People or Congre- gation-Synods Not Sovereign . 262
CHAPTER VII. ITS FUTURE.
The Indications Favorable-It Has a Future Mission-Prepared for it 266
HISTORY
OF THE
EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN
TENNESSEE SYNOD.
CHAPTER I.
THE CAUSES WHICH GAVE RISE TO ITS ORGANIZATION.
THE causes which gave rise to the organization of the Evangelical Lutheran Tennessee Synod, in the year 1820, will be found chiefly in the position which the Church occupied, at that time, in regard to doctrine and practice. Hence, it will be necessary, in the outset, to take a brief view of the condition of the Church, in these respects, dur- ing that period.
The most authentic records seem clearly to indicate that the Church generally adhered closely to the doctrines and principles of the Bible, as set forth and confessed in the Unaltered Augsburg Confession and her other Symbolical Books, until towards the close of the eighteenth and the beginning of the nineteenth century.
They were Lutherans,-just what their name indicated. The first Swedish colonists even, who settled in this country, based themselves firmly on the Augsburg Confession and Luther's Catechism. For a number of years every effort to preserve these doctrines in their purity and simplicity, was made. The instructions to the Governor were: "Before all, the Governor must labor and watch, that he render, in all things, to Almighty God, the true worship which is his due, the glory, the praise, and the homage that belong to
2
HISTORY OF THE EVANGELICAL
him, and take good measures that the Divine service is performed according to the true Confession of Augsburg, the Council of Upsal, and the ceremonies of the Swedish Church, having care that all men, and especially the youth, be instructed in all parts of Christianity, and that a good ecclesiastical discipline be observed and maintained."- Schaeffer's Early History, p. 15.
In accepting the aid offered by the King of England and the English Society, the Salzburg refugees made it a condition, "that they should be protected in the free exer- cise of their holy religion, as contained in the Augsburg Confession, and the other Symbolical Books of the Evan- gelical Lutheran Church, of which they professed to be members."-Dr. Mann's Lutheranism in America, p. 117.
Neither did Muhlenberg and his co-laborers teach any other doctrines, nor endeavor to establish, in this country, any other system of faith, than that inculcated in the Lu- theran Confessions and Catechisms. "The Lutheran Church in America was, from the beginning, built upon the old foundation of the Gospel, as interpreted by the collective body of the Symbolical Books ; and ministers and parochial school-masters were required to preach and teach in accord- ance with them."-Dr. Mann's Lutheranism in America, p. 112.
"When St. Michael's Church, in Philadelphia, was founded, in 1743, it was publicly proclaimed : "The corner- stone of this church has been laid, with the design that in it may be taught the Evangelical Lutheran doctrines, ac- cording to the apostles and prophets, as contained in the Unaltered Augsburg Confession, and all the other Symbol- ical Books.'"'-Halle Nachrichten, p. 288.
"In the year 1748, the ordination of Rev. N. Kurtz occurred, the Swedish pastors joining in the performance of the solemn rite ; but before it was performed, a declaration was exacted froin the candidate 'that he would adhere to the pure doctrine of our Evangelical Church, according to the Word of God and our Confessions of Faith.' The year
..
3
LUTHERAN TENNESSEE SYNOD.
preceding, Bruunholz re-dedicated a church, as 'an Evan- gelical Lutheran Church, according to the foundation of the prophets and apostles, and our Symbolical Books.'"- Halle Nachrichten, p. 252.
"In 1760, Paul D. Pryzelius was admitted into the Synod, after having made the following declaration: 'I sincerely promise, before God, the Searcher of hearts, that I will teach nothing to my congregations, except what is well founded in the canonical books of the Old and New Testaments, and to conform, in all my sermons, and in all my public and private instructions of the Holy Sacraments, to our Symbolical Books.'"-Halle Nachrichten, p. 856.
"In 1761, Muhlenberg gave direction for the form of the deeds for the newly begun church at Barren Hill, to the effect that they be 'prepared in such a way as forever to devote the church to the Evangelical Lutheran doctrine, according to the foundation of the Apostles, and the teacli- ings of the Unaltered Augsburg Confession.'"-Halle Nach- richten, pp. 864 and 1182.
"In the Constitution for the Philadelphia congregation (1762,) which became the model for many others, the first article required the minister to teach according to the Un- altered Augsburg Confession."-Halle Nachrichten, p. 762.
About the close of the eighteenth century and the beginning of the nineteenth, the fathers who had immigra- ted to this country, and done the hard and difficult work of the pioneer, had passed from this realm to that beyond the skies, to enjoy their rest and their rewards. Their fidelity to the Confessions of the Church and her Scriptural services, their arduous, conscientious, energetic labors in establishing and building congregations, their faithful Gospel preaching and careful catechetical instruction, their zealous family devotion, and their pious walk and conduct, had passed, and well nigh escaped the memory of the survivors.
Great political changes grew out of the results of the Revolutionary War. These, under the changed condition of things, together with other pernicious influences, which
4
HISTORY OF THE EVANGELICAL
found their way into this country, proved disparaging to the Church and her work, leaving Christianity in a very precarious state, vacillating to and fro, with very little defi- nite or fixed policy or principles. Under this new and unsettled condition of things, Liberty, Freedom, the all- absorbing element of that day, exaggerated and carried beyond its proper sphere or domain, resulted in ignoring almost every thing that was definite, fixed, or established. It seems, in fact, that there was scarcely any positive Christian faith really recognized, and that almost every trace of a true and living churchliness was obliterated.
Pietism and Rationalism prevailed to an alarming ex- tent in Germany and other countries. The former, inangu- rated by Spener,-a man of distinguished talents and rare learning,-for the purpose of reviving, in the Church, greater zeal for vital piety and practical Christianity, was afterwards carried beyond its contemplated object by Franke, a very zealous and able minister, and thus, amidst the agitation, it finally resulted in fanaticisin, as well as in a perversion of many of the leading doctrines of the Church, and in ignoring, to a greater or less extent, her true Con- fessions .- Kurtz's Church History, pp. 198, 199, 240.
The controversy between the Orthodox and the Pietists concentrated especially around the doctrines of Regenera- tion, of Justification, of Sanctification, of the Church, and of the Millennium. Page 242. Some of the ministers who immigrated to this country were of the Halle, Frankean, Pietistic school, and they came imbued with that spirit, to some extent, and infused it in some parts of the Church ; and, hence, it is, that we still see it occasionally cropping out, in certain sections, in its heterodox, fanatical elements.
The latter, Rationalism, in the language of Kurtz's Church History, p. 276, crept into the Protestant theology of the continent, especially of Germany. The extremes of Pietism, it appears, prepared the way for Rationalismi, the other extreme. One extreme usually results in another, in the opposite direction. Fanaticism generally ends in skep-
-
5
LUTHERAN TENNESSEE SYNOD.
ticism. This pernicious, disturbing element, Rationalism, also found its way to North America, and exerted a very baneful influence over the people in regard to the teachings of the Bible, as presented in the Confessions of the Church. The tendency was to yield or compromise nearly everything that was positive or definite, until, as Dr. Krauth said, in speaking of the condition of the Evangelical Lutheran Church, at the close of the eighteenth and the beginning of the nineteenth century, "We had a weak, indecisive pulpit, feeble catechisms, vague hymns, and constitutions which reduced the minister to the position of a hireling talker, and made Synods disorganizations for the purpose of preventing anything from being done." Unionism fol- lowed in the wake.
On the 13th day of November, 1787, "The Corpus Evangelicum, or Unio Ecclesiastica," was organized in South Carolina, "composed of Lutheran and German Re- formed ministers, together with lay-deputies from the churches belonging to both denominations."-Bernheim's History, &'c., p. 289. But this organization did not long continue, as must be the case with any union not based on agreement in doctrine and principles. Failure and trouble are written on the face of any such attempt.
A few years after the death of Rev. Dr. Muhlenberg, which took place October 7, 1787, the Ministerium of Penn- sylvania changed its confessional basis, to the disparage- ment of the Confessions. In a paper "on the Lutheran Church in America," Dr. Mann says: "While the consti- tution of the Ministerium of Pennsylvania, prepared under Muhlenberg's auspices, is based upon the Confessions of the Lutheran Church, in that published a few years after his death, they are entirely ignored ;" and Lutheranism continued to degenerate more and more, till a reaction was brought about.
In the year 1817, a new hymn-book, called Gemein- schaftliche Gesangbuch, intended for the Lutheran and Reformed Churches, published by Schaeffer & Maund, of
6
HISTORY OF THE EVANGELICAL
Baltimore, Md., was introduced, and after examination by all the Lutheran and Reformed Synods in the United States of America, at that time, its use in all the congregations was authorized. See "Comprehensive Account of the Rise and Progress of the Blessed Reformation of the Christian Church. By Dr. Martin Luther."* Prepared by Rev. G. Shober, of the North Carolina Synod. Pp. 146, 147.
In speaking of this new hymn-book, Rev. Shober says: "This meritorious undertaking paves the way to universal harmony, union, and love among our Lutheran and Reformed Churches, removing all the obstacles which hitherto prevented that happy effect, and establishes a uni- formity in that part of divine worship which cannot fail to be highly gratifying to all those who consider brotherly love an indispensable attribute of Christianity."
No doubt, this insidious course produced, to a consid- erable extent, for the time being, the effect which the author of those lines so much desired,-for the songs and services used in worship exert great influence. But whilst it was doing this, it was aiding in engendering and culti- vating a spirit which, as the child of an unjustifiable con- promise of principles, ultimately resulted in ignoring some of the most vital and fundamental doctrines and elements of the Church, leaving her in that latitudinarian state of indifference and laxness in regard to almost every thing that was regarded as positive and definite, in which she appeared about the beginning of the nineteenth century, without helm or rudder,-a deplorable wreck, requiring years for its restoration.
It may not be inadmissible to call attention here to the great religious revival which swept over the United States in 1800 and 1801, not that the Evangelical Lutheran Church gave it any special countenance at that time,-at a
* If occasions for referring to the above work, in writing this history, present themselves, we shall indicate that work by the title, Luther, as "Luther" is the name which appears on the back of the book.
7
.
LUTHERAN TENNESSEE SYNOD.
later period this delusive system or plan of operation was introduced in some portions of her territory,-but to show the unsettled, unchurchly state of religion, in general, in this country, at that time.
In regard to it, Rev. Storch, of North Carolina, writes : "By the side of this pestilence (infidelity), there prevails now, for over a year, a something, I know not what to name it, and I should not like to say Fanaticism. Chris- tians of every denomination assemble themselves in the forest, numbering four, six and sometimes ten thousand persons; they erect tents, sing, pray, and preach, day and night, for five, six, and eight days. I have been an eye- witness to scenes in such large assemblies, which I cannot explain. I beheld young and old, feeble and strong, white and black, in short, people of every age, position, and cir- cumstance, as though they were struck by lightning, speechless and motionless; and, when they had somewhat recovered, they could be heard shrieking bitterly, and sup- plicating God for inercy and grace.
"After they had thus spent three, and many even more, hours, they rose up, praised God, and commenced to pray in such a manner, as they never were wont to do, exhorting sinners to come to Jesus, &c. Many of those who were thus exercised, were ungodly persons before, and we call 110w discover a remarkable change in them. Even deists have been brought to confess Christ in this way. Thus this thing continues even to this hour.
"Opinions are various in regard to it; many, even ministers, denominate it the work of the devil ; others again would explain it in a natural way, or in accordance with some physical law ; whilst others look upon it as the work of God."-Rev. Dr. Bernheim's History of the Lutheran Church in the Carolinas, pp. 351, 353.
In the Minutes of a Conference, held in Rader's Church, Rockingham County, Virginia, in 1806, Rev. Paul Henkel says relative to this revival :
8
HISTORY OF THE EVANGELICAL
"Towards the close of the year 1801, there occurred a mighty waking up of religion among the English people in Guilford and Orange Counties, N. C., which caused our German people to understand the true worth of the Gospel. Both the pastors and their people were surprised; for it appeared exceedingly strange to those who were well ac- quainted with the order of salvation, that true conversion should consist in such a way as declared by these people ; that true faith should originate in such sermons, as caused such corporeal convulsions, such representations of the devil, death. and hell; the fearful and awful expressions of lightning, thunder, hail, fire, and brimstone against the sinner, deprived many of their senses, and prostrated then in fainting fits.
"As the like proceedings were upheld and defended by so many English preachers, and as many had declared that by means of such workings they had received true and reliable witness of the pardon of their sins and of the new birth, many of us hesitated to contradict such proceedings, although they were thought to be so contrary to the doc- trines of the Gospel. Many passages of Scripture were pointed out as opposed to these outward manifestations ; but many good meaning persons defended them as Scriptu- ral, whereupon the important question arose among them : ' Must we not also experience the same thing in order to be saved ?' The people became anxious and concerned, were much affected and distressed, and pressed upon their pas- tors to decide this matter for them, who were unwilling to do this without due consideration and the fullest assurance.
"The German ministers were at first divided in their opinions on this subject ; nevertheless, it 'drove them to more intimate communion with each other in their official acts, and they have thus the opportunity to investigate this matter more closely."
This course of procedure, that is, this revival theory. also had a tendency to divert the mind from the regular Means of Grace as set forth in the Word of God, as well as
9
LUTHERAN TENNESSEE SYNOD.
from a reliance on the promises contained in Divine Reve- lation, to a dependence on the feelings or emotions, for salvation, thus disparaging, to a greater or less extent, the true doctrines of the Holy Scriptures, and leaving the Church in a state of distraction, in regard to some of the most vital features of sound Scriptural theology.
In the year 1794, Robert Johnson Miller, -a licentiate of the Methodist Episcopal Conference, -was ordained, by Lutheran pastors, of Cabarrus and Rowan Counties, North Carolina, on petition from White Haven Church, Lincoln County, North Carolina, really as a minister of the Protest- ant Episcopal Church in America, under obligations always to obey the Rules, Ordinances, and Customs of that Society of Christians ; as his ordination certificate will show,-on the opposite side of which the Lutheran ministers give their reasons for ordaining a man who was attached to the Epis- copal Church, as a minister of that denomination .- See Bernheim's History of the Lutheran Church in the Carolinas, pp. 338, 339.
As such, he labored in connection with the Lutherans of North Carolina, and after the organization of the Evan- gelical Lutheran Synod in that State, in 1803, he continued to labor in that Synod till 1821, when he severed that con- nection, and was ordained in Raleigh, N. C., to deacon's and priest's orders in the Episcopal ministry. In his former connection, even as an Episcopalian, he labored for a period of twenty-seven years.
According to the Journal of the Episcopal North Caro- lina Convention of 1818, it seems that previous to the year 1816, there was no Episcopal clergyman in that State, and but one congregation in which the worship of that church was performed. Hence it was, that the said Miller thought it his duty to form a temporary connection with the Lu- theran Church. He was a man of quite respectable attain- ments, energy, zeal, and perseverance, and did much missionary work among the Lutherans. But it is not unreasonable to conclude that such connection and policy
IO
HISTORY OF THE EVANGELICAL
had a tendency to looseness in doctrine and practice, as well as to unionism.
In 1821, a move was made to effect a fraternal union between the North Carolina Synod and the Protestant Epis- copal Convention of North Carolina. At the Episcopal Convention, held in Raleigh, April 28, 1821, which Rev. Robert J. Miller attended with a view to connect himself fully with the Episcopal Church, "to which he really be- longed, having been ordained by Lutheran ministers of North Carolina, as an Episcopal minister, and was the pastor of an Episcopal congregation, White Haven Church, in Lincoln County," he proposed the establishment of such a union. His proposition was accepted, and received the proper action on the part of the Episcopal Convention, to consummate the contemplated union. At its meeting in Lau's Church, Guilford County, North Carolina, June 17, 1821, the Lutheran North Carolina Synod accepted the proposition, and the delegates of the Episcopal Convention being present, the union was completed. At the next Epis- copal Convention, held in Raleigh, April 18, 1822, the pro- ceedings were ratified. But it seems this union did not long continue. "For, after the year 1823, nothing more appears concerning the fraternal relations of these two bodies."- See Bernheim's History, &c., p. 457.
In 1810, Gottlieb Shober, a Moravian, was ordained by the Lutheran Synod of North Carolina, but it seems, that, in some way, he also retained his connection with the Mo- ravians. He resided all liis life in Salem, North Carolina, and labored in some Lutheran churches in its vicinity .- In regard to him, Bernlieim's History, pp. 441, 442, says : "Rev. Shober was no Lutheran, he was a member of the Moravian Church, and never disconnected himself from com- munion with the same ; he lived and died as a member of that church. This information the writer received from his own daughter, the widow of Bishop Herrman. He merely served the Lutheran Church in the capacity of one of its ministers, being pastor of several neglected Lutheran con-
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.