The encyclopedia of Texas, V.1, Part 6

Author: Davis, Ellis Arthur, ed; Grobe, Edwin H., ed
Publication date: 1922
Publisher: Dallas, Texas Development Bureau
Number of Pages: 1204


USA > Texas > The encyclopedia of Texas, V.1 > Part 6


Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).


Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45 | Part 46 | Part 47 | Part 48 | Part 49 | Part 50 | Part 51 | Part 52 | Part 53 | Part 54 | Part 55 | Part 56 | Part 57 | Part 58 | Part 59 | Part 60 | Part 61 | Part 62 | Part 63 | Part 64 | Part 65 | Part 66 | Part 67 | Part 68 | Part 69 | Part 70 | Part 71 | Part 72 | Part 73 | Part 74 | Part 75 | Part 76 | Part 77 | Part 78 | Part 79 | Part 80 | Part 81 | Part 82 | Part 83 | Part 84 | Part 85 | Part 86 | Part 87 | Part 88 | Part 89 | Part 90 | Part 91 | Part 92 | Part 93 | Part 94 | Part 95 | Part 96 | Part 97 | Part 98 | Part 99 | Part 100 | Part 101 | Part 102 | Part 103 | Part 104 | Part 105 | Part 106 | Part 107 | Part 108 | Part 109 | Part 110 | Part 111 | Part 112 | Part 113 | Part 114 | Part 115


The discovery of "Spindle Top" or the "Beaumont Field," as it is more properly called, was a "real epoch," a "decisive period" in the oil business. It was the first opportunity of the "Independents" in .


E


The New Magnolia Building, Dallas, the Tallest Office Building in Texas, Completed in 1922


the history of oil. This Beaumont field together with the later discovery of Sour Lake, Batson, Sar ?- toga, and Humble, and later still at Goose Creek and West Columbia, all have produced a total of more than 250,000,000 barrels of oil, and from an actual producing area for the total of these fields, of probably not to exceed 4,000 acres


But Texas is a large state and all of its oil was not to be confined to its coastal fields. Before the Beaumont discoveries a very profitable pool of oil had been found at Corsicana, Navarro County, Texas, but not until the Electra Field in Wichita County was developed was the production in Texas of high grade oils for refining purposes really an important factor in the industry. This was in 1911


The interest in Electra has subsided, the "wise ones" who had finally come to Texas when this real oil was discovered, had returned to Oklahoma and


A Wilderness of Oil Derricks in the Goose Greek Oil Fields Southern Texas


24


ENCYCLOPEDIA OF TEXAS


the east, and it was the faith of Edgar L. Marston, of New York City, President of the Texas-Pacific coal Company, and W. K. Gordon, his able manager in Texas, who called them back, when in the month of October 1917, they drilled to the "Farmer's" sand and developed the MeClesky well, near the then small town of Ranger, Eastland County, Texas. The developments following this discovery have opened the eyes of the world to the possibilities of Texas, as the Great Reservoir, from which the greatest production of oil for many years to come, will be obtained. As a result of this new discovery, "wild eatting" (the name for drilling in new territory be- fore the discovery of oil in the vicinity) was stim- ulated, and has resulted in a greatly enlarged pro- ducing area around Ranger at Caddo and Brecken- ralge in Stephens County, and at Desdemona in Com- merce County, and also the development of the new and spectacular Burkburnett field in Wichita County These discoveries promise to extend not only over these counties but into the adjoining counties of Young, Wilbarger and Archer, also Palo Pinto. In each of these counties light oil in small quantities has already been discovered. How much further this development will be extended within the counties named, and with what results, or whether oil will be developed in paying quantities in additional coun- ties in North Texas, is beyond the knowledge of man. More recently the Mexia field in Limestone County, had been developed by Col. A. E. Humphreys one of the most spectacularly successful "wild cat- ters" in the business. This new development opens up again possibilities for Texas to become the great producing state of the Union.


Great sums of money are being, and will yet be, spent in practically every county of Central, North and Northwest Texas, and while geology is being followed very largely in these efforts, it is only the drill that will produce results.


An average well in the Comanche, Eastland, and Stephens County fields, is from 3,000 to 3,400 feet deep, to where the oil is found in what is known as the "Black Line" formation. These wells will vary in size from 25 barrels to 12,000 barrels in their initial production, and cost from $32,000 to $50,000 each to drill and equip. Such wells cannot be prof- itably drilled at present high cost of labor, material, rte., if they produce less than 100 barrels or more per day, and wells of this minimum size must prove consistent producers for a long period in order to pay out. The fields have not been producing for a sufficiently long period to determine this.


Shallow oil is also being developed in these areas at from 1,800 to 2,150 feet in depth and this oil, on account of the greater amount of sand, and the lesser cost of drilling, may yet prove of greater value than the deep production.


In the Burkburnett field, the oil is found at from 1,500 to 1,750 feet, and the cost of a well is much less, probably now about $20,000; the amount of producing sand is greater in this field, also, than in the "Black Line" district, further south, and within the confines of the pool the average initia! production of the wells is greater. This field has -on the "Eldorado" of the small producer, and where the operations have been carried on with good judgement, and the financing honest and reasonably conservative, will probably make for the operators


and their stockholders, more money on the average than any of the Texas fields, so far developed.


The oil of North and North Central Texas, is of a gravity varying 34 degrees B, to 44 degrees B. It gives a yield of Gasoline of from 12 to 40% and much of it has good lubricating values. It is pro- bably the equal in value of the average Oklahoma oil, excepting that of the Healdton field, which is much inferior, much of it is better than the Kansas oil, and is better than that produced in Ohio, Illi- nois and Indiana, but not the equal of the oils pro- duced in Pennsylvania and West Virginia, on account of the superior lubricating values of these latter oils.


When the Texas-Pacific Coal & Oil Company made the discovery in the McClesky well at Ranger, Texas was producing not over 30,000 barrels of light oils in all of its then developed fields; it is now produc- ing about 200,000 barrels, or a production on Nov. 1, 1921, much less than that of Kansas and Okla-


Oil Gusher at Currie, which Opened Up a New Field Four- teen Miles North of Mexia


homa combined. South Texas is producing about. 110,000 barrels. What Texas will produce in the future is anyone's guess, but my prediction is that this production will gradually grow, and that for the next twenty years, Texas will be leader in the pro- duction of the light and high grade oil of the world.


In conclusion, this means prosperity for all con- cerned, for the farmer, for the merchant, for the banker, for the worknien in the field, and for the oil operator. The cities of Dallas, Ft. Worth and Wichita Falls have greatly prospered, and in the future will still greatly prosper by these develop- ments and from the general good times resulting from this new discovery in their midst.


25


OIL PRODUCTION OF TEXAS BY FIELDS FROM 1895 TO JANUARY 1, 1922


Year


Corsicana


Powell


Petrolia


Spindle Top


Sour Lake


Batson


Saratoga


Humble


Goose Creek


1895


1896


1,450


1897


65,975


1898


544,620


1899


668,483


1900


829,560


5,479


3,593,113


44,338


4,518


739,239


1905


312,595


131,051


101,651


1.600,379


3,369,012


3,790,629


2,922,215


18,066,428


1906


336,387


675,842


111,072


1.075,755


2,156,010


2,388,238


2,289,057


3,570,845


1907


276,311


596,897


83,260


1,613.513


2.354,997


2,166,554


2,198,585


2,930,842


1908


211,117


398.649


113,485


1,747,537


1,595,060


1,593,570


1,634.786


3,778,521


1909


180,764


383,137


113,485


1,388,170


1,703,798


1,206,214


1,183,559


3,237,060


1910


137,331


450.188


126,531


1,182,436


1,518,723


1.113,767


1.024,348


2,495,511


1911


128,526


373,055


168,965


965,939


1,364,880


1,023,493


925,777


2,426,220


43,808


1913


158,830


283,476


344,868


716,374


1,348,053


741,350


937,720


1,504,880


249,641


1914


133,811


282,279


550,585


580,130


5,209,208


775,804


889.743


2,799,458


134,748


1915


143,275


237,410


349,857


388,266


4.114,622


703,686


864,266


11,061,802


119,336


1916


135,263


215,729


302,145


340,441


4,923,332


744,915


781,128


10,925,805


397,291


1917


131,828


196,855


282,420


308,039


4,763,004


692,417


682,797


7,389,831


7,300,279


1918


*361,980


297,320


502,265


3,115,033


654,950


790,740


5,645,104


9,419,132


1919


*150,000


212,624


458,680


2,740,142


502,200


616,110


3,270,617


7,288,716


1920


530,000


135,385


323,995


2,073,485


484,035


913,735


3,692,115


5,666,390


1921


305,335


132,295


321,080


1,749,625


516,225


936,695


3,098,500


5,647.020


Totals


8,087,361


4,794,692


3,657,978


47,384,644


60,608,946


30,851,865


22,447,155


87,723,462


36,266,261


*Includes Powell.


Year


Orange County


Matagorda County


Dayton


Blue Ridge and Other Pools


Marian County


Wichita and Wilbarger Counties


Moran


Thrall Miscellaneous


1904


151,936


1905


46,470


60,294


1906


8,000


192,460


1907


4,500


120,036


31,185


129,497


251,717


899.579


1913


17,706


294,553


13,329


1,620


262,392


8,131,624


1915


21,697


137,481


10,378


47,254


123,464


5,833,386


109,116


613,182


4,061


1916


17,758


158,336


8,571


43,921


64,971


7,837,386


135,608


432,695


32,140


1917


-7,023


128,011


9,995


159,245


57,952


9,541,636


68,118


176,887


111,220


1918


3,425


99,340


7,442


40,000


12,159,032


54,900


12,000


130,000


1919


4,400


53,260


1,000


24,910


30,279,108


32,500


8,200


235,075


1920


4,000


75,775


1,000


*173,085


32,895,485


48,575


8,000


25,000


1921


704,870


89,405


30,410


*461,035


24,184,955


50,455


73,280


24,000


Totals


824,087


2,821,029


557,331


1,204,415


1,981,639


144,217,246


567,463


1,324,244


601,640


** Figures not obtainable.


*Blue Ridge only.


e-Estimated


Year


Strawn


Coleman County


Eastland County


Stephens County


Desdemona


Brown County


Damon Mound


Hull


1915


50,498


1916


175,147


1917


340,950


93,053


36,219


6,040


1918


185,520


31,253


3,107,120


790,243


451,002


486,640


330,300


1919


101,300


46,590


22,379,665


10,514,216


7,375,825


213,256


434,700


1,476,405


1920


512,260


83,785


10,141,385


23,852,050


5,097,745


114,665


1,259,375


4,468.615


1921


262,055


66,190


5,887,420


31,037,710


2,467,115


122,475


1,353,960


8,717,970


Totals


1,627,730


227,819


41,608,643


66,230,438


14,940,685


907,438


3,534,675


14,993,290


Year


Mexia


Young County


Nacogdoches Holliday-Archer


County


Pierce Junction


Barber's Hill


West Columbia


San Antonio District and Somerset


1918


20,000


136,350


58,400


1919


169,415


8,128,809


94,100


1920


134,895


75,000


49,850


136,375


10,563,150


245,135


1921


4,716,805


2.820,080


103,035


422,205


1,403,940


49,885


12,573,450


482,340


Totals


4.716,805


2,954,975


178,035


472.055


1,403,940


375,675


31.401,759


879.975


1889


48


1804


60


1899


669 013


1904


22 241 413


1909


9 534 467


1914


20 068 184


1919


85 312 000


1890


54


1895


50


1900


836 039


1903


28 136 189


1910


8 899 260


1915


24 942 701


1920


96 000 000


1891


54


1896


1 450


1901


4 393 658


1906


12 567 897


1911


9 526 474


1916


27,644,605


1921 111,969,575


1892


45


1897


65.975


1902


18.083,659


1907


12,322,696


1912


11.735,057


1917


32,413,287


1893


50


1898


546,070


1903


17 955 572


1908.


11,206,464


1913


15,009,478


1918


38,50,031


620,831,50)


TOTAL AMOUNT OF OIL PRODUCED IN EACH STATE IN 1921-ALSO AMOUNT PRODUCED FROM 1859 TO JAN 1, 1922


Total 1921


1859 to 1922


Total 1921


1859 to 1922


Total 1921


1859 to 1921


Pa, and N. Y. ..


8.410.(KX)


814.415,053


Colorado. Indiana.


108,200 1,165,000


109,132,364


Oklahoma.


111,256,160


1,149,429,517


Wext Virginia


7,945 000


319.625,398


Illinois


331.518,380


Wyo. & Mont .....


20.473,800


91,242,69%


California,


114,267,000


1,431,383.300


Kansas.


10,085,000 24,312,586


256,303,984


Louisiana.


27,814,380


230,483,291


Ky. & Tenn ..


9,092,300


41,015,992


Texas


111,969,575


620 831,550


United States


474,858,216


5,904 550,935


1912


300,000


12,151


1,044


362,870


4,227,104


1914


43,208


164,192


18,791


1,780


180,584


8,227,951


68,191


4.525


1909


29,103


17,647


87,039


4,554


1910


455,999


9,582


3,656


1911


561,828


4,344


2,800


677,689


1912


233,282


251,240


197,421


822,916


1,175,108


844,563


1,116,655


1,829,923


1903


401,817


100,143


8,600,905


8,848.159


1904


374,318


129,329


65,455


3,433,842


6,442,357


10,904,737


1901


763,424


37,121


1902


571,079


46,812


17,420,949


ـا معافى


$6,977


Ohio


7,314,000


486,336,978


.


11.779,250


Missouri


26


-


TOTAL PRODUCTION OF OIL FOR TEXAS EACH YEAR FROM 1889 TO JAN. 1, 1922 IN BARRELS OF 42 GALLONS


Grand Total from 1889 to 1921.


62,640


39,901


3,379


4,062


7,074


12,900


1908


HISTORY OF SOUTHERN TEXAS OIL INDUSTRY By D. R. BEATTY Pioneer Oil Operator


T HE history of oil de- velopment in what is known as the Coastal region comprising the terri- tory bordering the Gulf of Mexico in South Texas and South Louisiana dated back to the famous Lucas gusher well at Spindle Top, in Jef- ferson County, three miles south of Beaumont by com- mon consent. This well came in in January, 1901, but as a matter of fact shallow wells had been drilled pre- vious to that date in what are now known as the Sour Lake, Saratoga and Spindle Top Pools. As far back as 1883 small wells producing a heavy natural lubricat- ing crude had been developed at Oil Springs, a short distance from the town of Nacogdoches in Nacogdoches County. These wells found the oil in a sand around 280 feet.


A pipe line was laid to Nacogdoches and the oil shipped out in cars for use by railroads, but big marketing companies in the east made contracts with the roads of the southwest for their lubricating needs at price that made it unprofitable to operate the shallow holes.


As far back as 1895 and 1896 the Savage Bros., contractors from West Virginia, drilled shallow wells at Sour Lake and Saratoga, getting light wells around 250 feet. Long before that, however, "spring pole" holes had been put down at Saratoga, getting a heavy gravity crude which was sold for medicinal purposes. Sour Lake had enjoyed a reputation as a local health resort on account of the "sour" water springs and its fame had spread as far east as New Orleans and over to St. Louis, guests coming from both places for the mud baths and to drink the waters.


The development of the Coastal pools was a long, up-hill fight and it is safe to assume that no other oil producing section received less aid in the work of development from the larger oil companies then in the lead in the eastern fields. The product was looked upon as a low grade crude, fit only for fuel purposes and these large eastern companies adopted a policy of hands off. Financing the develop- ment work fell largely on the shoulders of men who had been identified with lumber and other interests in South Texas and Southern Louisiana. Much criti- cism has been attached to the methods of promoters of oil com- panies in the early days of the in- dustry in the Coastal region, but a large part of that criticism is un- . just. Those men who were interest-


ed in the early day developments were compelled to seek outside financial aid, but the big banking in- terests of the east followed the example of the large oil companies and declined to identify themselves with the prospect. In this emergency operators found it necessary to turn to the public, through the medium of advertising and other methods to secure investors who would put in the money to develop the pools. That fake promoters took ad- vantage of the situation cannot be denied and that irregularities followed is a matter of the history of the pools. Most of those originally interested in the developments during the early days knew little or nothing about the petroleum industry. Fuel markets for their product had to be found in com- petition with coal and the big railroad systems were naturally loath to adopt what to their officials looked like an experiment. Meantime, the wells were allowed to flow and soon the quotation dropped to as low as three cents per barrel. The result was failures and the loss of investments by those who had looked forward to fortunes with a conse- quent reputation that the original operators do not deserve.


Gradually, the large eastern companies became converted to the value of the Coastal product and became interested in the development work, laying pipe lines, building refineries and establishing mar- keting agencies. Among the first of these was the J. M. Guffey Petroleum Company, financed by the Mellon interests, of Pittsburg, Pa .; the Sun Company, Security Oil Company, et al. 'T'he 'l'exas Company, now one of the leading oil corporations in the world, had its inception at Spindle Top and the Gulf Refining Company is another. The little 100 barrel lubricating plant started in 1898 at Sour Lake by the Gulf Coast Refining Company, operat- ing on the production of five wells producing from


One of the Large Office Buildings in the Business Section of Houston


27


ENCYCLOPEDIA OF TEXAS


around 280 feet, has given place to the immense refining plants of the Texas Company and Gulf Pro- duction Company at Port Arthur, each with a charg- ing capacity of 60,000 barrels per day; the Mag- nolia Petroleum Company at Beaumont, with a ca- pacity of 65,000 barrels per day; Galena-Signal Oil Company on the Houston Ship Canal and the Pierce Oil Corporation plant at Texas City, while the Sin- clair Oil & Refining Company will start its 20,000 barrel plant next month. The Crown Oil & Refining Company is erecting a 20,000 barrel capacity re- finery on the channel and the Humble Oil & Refining Company is building a plant that will eventually have a capacity of 60,000 barrels per day. Half a dozen smaller plants are either operating or are in the process of construction. Not all these plants, however, are designed to operate on the Gulf Coast crude. The Galena-Signal Oil Company is using Coastal crude exclusively for the manufacture of lubricants. However, the producing end of all these companies started originally in the Gulf Coast pools, and are still producing two-thirds of the out- put from them.


Among the men first identified with the Gulf region, who are now national figures in the oil world may be mentioned: Judge R. E. Brooks, a director of the Texas Company, who forsook the law for the oil business at Spindle Top; C. N. Scott, vice-president and general manager of the Texas Company; Messrs. Thomas J. and Ambrose M. Donoghue, both connected with the Texas Company; Judge Wm. D. Bates, with the Texas Company; D. R. Beatty, who brought in the first big well in the Humble pool, January 7, 1905, flowing 8,000 barrels per day, the second well at Spindle Top and the second well at Sour Lake; J. S. Cullinan, presi- dent Republic Production Company, president Ga- lena-Signal Oil Company, director in the Fidelity Trust Company, president Houston Chamber of Commerce and president Texas Chamber of Com- merce. Mr. Cullinan was formerly president of the Texas Company; J. Edgar Pew, of the Sun Company, whose ancestors were among the pioneer operators in the Pennsylvania fields; T. P. Lee, vice-president and general manager Republic Production Company; E. F. Woodward, one of the organizers of the Re- public Production Company; H. T. Staiti, and E. F. Simms, both large operators now in Texas, Louisiana and Oklahoma; Walter Sharpe and Billie Lyons, both pioneer operators in the Gulf Coast and now associated with the producing end of the Texas Company; Cal Clark, now with the Standard Oil Company of Louisiana, one of the organizers of the Burt Refining Company of Beaumont, now owned by the Standard; Capt. Terrell, one of the original promoters of the Haywood Oil Company; Haywood Brothers, pioneer operators; Jas. Jolley, manager Empire Gas & Fuel Company of Texas; Niels Esper- son, Jno. O'Neal, J. R. Cheek, R. L. Blaffer, R. L. Young, W. S. Farish, W. W. Fondren, J. C. McKal- lipp, Harry Weiss, J C. Wilson, R. C. Duff, Jim West and H. H. Myers, all pioneer operators in the Gulf Coast, some of whom, however, have become interested in Oklahoma and the latter North Central Texas fields. Gov. Hogg and Will C. Hogg, pro- nioters of the Landslide Oil Company; Burt & Grif- fith, noted for their efforts to develop new fields; Jack E. Crosby, pioneer operator at Spindle Top; J. E. Webb, operator and considered one of the best well men in the Gulf Coast; R. S. Sterling, largely


through his efforts the Humble Oil Company oc- cupies the commanding position, in the oil industry, which it does today; Lee Hager, looked upon as one of the most prominent geologists in the Gulf Coast; W. C. Turnbow, another of the pioneers who has interests in practically all the fields in Texas, also owner of one of the largest cattle ranches in Texas; Underwood Nazro, vice-president of the Gulf allied interests; Joe McCue, now on the execu- tive board of the Texas Company, was one of the first Pittsburg operators to reach Spindle Top after the bringing in of the Lucas well. He took full charge of all development for Guffey & Gayle, who purchased the Lucas well; Chas. Wallis, formerly president of the Higgins Oil Company, who was one of the first operators at Spindle Top; Jno. Gil- bert; Steve Pipkin; Judge Douglas, pioneer operator at Batson; Duson Brothers, connected with the Crowley Oil & Mineral Company of Jennings, La .; Tump Bass, Jno. H. Kirby, now heavily interested in North Central Texas; A. F. Tarver and Ed. Peggie; Dias Brothers, who opened up the Saratoga pool; Capt. Lucas, owner of the famous Lucas gusher; Ed Prater, connected with Walter Sharp during the Spindle Top days; Jim Putnam, owner of Sour Lake property; Jno. Gonzalas, operator at Sour Lake; W. S. Griffith, Murry Done, acting vice- president of the Gulf Company, formerly with the Sun Company; Mr. Grives, who was connected with the Star & Crescent Oil Company; H. S. Revis, editor Investors' Journal; Farmer Dean, pioneer operator at Big Hill, Matagorda County.


History of the Pools. Singular as it may seem the first big well at Spindle Top was started by Capt. A. F. Lucas as a sulphur proposition, backed by Guffey and Galey, who were the leading "Wild- catters" in the business. In 1892 Patillio Higgins drilled a hole to 300 feet where he quit on account of the lack of tools. Sharp & Company drilled a shallow hole in 1894, followed by J. Loomey in 1896. The Savage Bros. made a shallow test in 1898 and in October, 1900 C. G. and Al Hamel drilled in the famous Lucal well which was estimated as high at 75,000 barrels, getting the pay between 1,120 and 1,139 feet. The second well, known as the Betty well, was drilled in by Stern Brothers, estimated at 40,000 to 50,000 barrels per day. Fifteen wells had been completed by July, 1901. The producing area covered about 250 acres on a slight elevation about 15 feet above sea level.


Sour Lake. The first development at Sour Lake, which is some 18 miles west of Beaumont, in Hardin County, Texas, was in 1893, when a little 16 per cent (Beaume) oil was found at a depth of fron 260 to 370 feet by Walter Sharp. This was not de- veloped commercially. In 1895, the Savage Brothers found oil in several shallow wells. In 1895 the Gulf Coast Refining Company built a small 100 barrel refinery and five wells were drilled, none of them exceeding 280 feet in depth. In three of them the Savage Brothers found oil at 230 feet of about 16 gravity. The first large well was brought in by . Walter Sharp on the Shoestring tract, and the second large well was drilled in by Mitchell & Little for D. R. Beatty on the Cannon tract. This well flowed one year to a day.


In 1901 the J. M. Guffey Petroleum Company got gas and sonie oil at 822 feet. Hooks, No. 1 in the Saratoga pool came in in 1902. flowing 1,000 barrels at 1,000 feet. Brice, No. 1 was a big well at 400


--.


28


ENCYCLOPEDIA OF TEXAS


feet. During the years 1903-4 the 800 and 1,000 foot sands were developed with a deeper pay found in 1905.


Batson. Batson field was discovered through oil and gas seepages, the first producing well being drilled in October, 1903, by the Paraffine Oil Com- rany of Beaumont, which later became a part of the Humble Oil Company. The first well was fin- .hed at 1,280 feet by Mitchell & Little, and was a fair producer of 23 Beaume oi !.


Within the next forty-five days four wells had ?cen completed by the Paraffine and Producers (pro- ducing subsidiary of the Texas Company) had prac- twally the entire field under lease. As the oil was found at comparatively shallow depths, wells were finished in a hurry. The Guffey and the Texas Company had laid pipe lines from the field to Sara- toga, where they connected with their Sour Lake pipe lines, and the Guffey had built a telegraph une through the wilderness between Batson and Saratoga.


The real excitement did not begin until Decem- br 19th, when the Paraffine No. 2 came in, making 6,000 barrels of 30 gravity oil from 1,150 feet. On December 24th the Para i'ne brought in No. 3, a 15,000 barrel well, from the cap rock. This big flood of new production caused an immediate slump in prices and oil went down to 25 cents per barrel.


During the next few months Batson experienced one of the biggest booms that has been experienced in the Coastal fields. Earthern storage with ca- pacity of 3,500 to 4,000,000 barrels was constructed and by 1904 a great part of it was filled, as up to that time the field, not yet six months old, had produced 4,000,000 barrels of oil.


After the wells began coming in there was much danger from gas. At times the gas from the pro- ducing wells would hang like a fog just above the ground. One Houston oil man tells the story of crawling along the ground, through the fresh air which lay between the gas and ground in order to escape being poisoned by the gas. Three or four good whiffs of the gas were sufficient to asphyxiate a person unless that person got into fresh air im- mediately. It finally got so bad that it was burned off as it was separated from the oil. It is said that the wild geese confused at night by the great glare from the burning gas, would fly around and around the flame and fall to the ground at last, ex- hausted or even dead. One man built his house at night by the light of these great natural torches.




Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.