USA > California > Alameda County > Past and present of Alameda County, California, Volume I > Part 16
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45 | Part 46 | Part 47 | Part 48 | Part 49 | Part 50 | Part 51 | Part 52 | Part 53 | Part 54 | Part 55 | Part 56 | Part 57 | Part 58 | Part 59 | Part 60
The first appropriation for the Oakland harbor was made by Congress in 1874. In that year the freight business amounted to 154,300 tons. By 1882 the freight amounted to 1,225.266 tons and the passengers carried to 858.352. In August, 1882, $263,389 was available for continuing the harbor improvement. At this time, with a harbor channel only two feet deep, Oakland's commerce was as follows : Traffic by ferry, 60,000 tons ; traffic by vessels, 94,300 tons ; total, 154.300 tons. In 1888, with a channel twelve feet deep, the traffic by steam ferries was 1.876,633 tons ; traffic by vessels at railroad temporary wharf, 492,417 tons ; traffic by vessels at city wharves, 221,370 tons ; total, 2,590,422 tons. Recent dredging was a great disappointment, because it widened instead of deepened the channel
123
HISTORY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY
to the city wharves. What Oakland wanted-had begged for from the start- was a channel of sufficient depth to permit large ocean-going steamers to reach its docks.
In 1875 prominent citizens undertook to arrange that the land required for the tidal canal, 862/3 acres, should be obtained without cost to the United States other than the cost of survey and of legal condemnation proceedings. In the autumn of 1875 these proceedings were instituted in the state court with the view to obtain thereafter a special legislative act authorizing the city to levy a tax sufficient to pay for the land condemned. In April, 1876, the Legislature author- ized the city to raise $25,000 by taxation for this purpose. It was not until Sep- tember, 1882, that the condemnation proceedings were completed, at which time the court made a decree assessing the land at $39,696, of which the city was to pay $25,000, and the United States $14,696. It was found that nearly twenty thousand tons of stone were required to complete the jetties. A contract was made for II,650 tons, leaving 8,950 tons to be supplied under a second contract. The chan- nel-way, which was completed June 21, 1882, resulted in a 300-foot cut, ten feet deep at low water and a central 100-foot cut deepened from 10 to 14 feet at low water, which depths were afterward maintained in spite of some shoaling by sandy washings from the banks. This lack of tidal prism was remedied by suitable operations in the inner harbor. The next operation was to increase the tidal prism and was accomplished by dredging a tidal basin and by cutting a tidal canal con- necting Oakland harbor with the San Leandro estuary. This was the situation in February, 1884.
Work on the harbor improvement progressed rapidly during 1875. A large gang of Chinamen were constantly employed in unloading the scows which brought rock from the quarries; they remained on the works night and day and their home was in a rough board house built on a scow. They were at work on the creek route to San Francisco.
In 1876-77 Congress refused to include in the appropriation bill any amount for continuing the improvement of Oakland harbor. Mr. Page asked for $100,000, but this allowance was opposed on the ground that a private concern-the pak- land Water Front Company-claimed all the submerged land along the point out to a depth of twenty-four feet and also claimed the whole of the San Antonio estuary. The company had dedicated for purposes of navigation a channel 300 feet wide, but claimed the submerged land up to the banks of this channel, the right to build wharves thereon, and the ownership of the tidal basin of Oakland harbor. As long as these claims existed, or were unsettled, it was out of the question to secure from Congress an appropriation for improving what might prove to be, when settled in the courts or otherwise, private property. The perma- nent channel contemplated required a tidal basin to receive the inflowing tide and to disburse it again in the bay. It had been proposed to connect the San Leandro and San Antonio estuary by a canal to cost in all $500,000, but this step was also opposed, because it was not yet settled who was the lawful owner of the San Antonio estuary. The Water Front Company began operations of proprietorship which were stopped by the Government on the ground that it was exceeding its rights. Soon the company agreed to yield all claim to any portion that would interfere with the contemplated improvements. Time passed and the House com- mittee reported the bill without the harbor appropriation. Mr. Page then under-
124
HISTORY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY
took to defeat the whole bill and succeeded. He then began again to remove all objections. He returned home, consulted all persons and companies concerned and finally in April, 1877, obtained the consent of the Water Front Company to deed to the United States all their right, title and interest in and to all the submerged lands of the estuary, or bordering thereon, which might be necessary for carrying out the plans of improvement of Oakland harbor. It was during the terms of office of Mayors Durant, Spaulding and Webber that the Oakland harbor improve- ment was inaugurated and pushed forward with vigor. These officials did every- thing in their power to keep the project everlastingly before Congress.
The Oakland harbor plans in February, 1884, provided that all available money should be applied to the completion of the jetties and to the excavation of the tidal basin. The contract provided for dredging to the amount of 600,000 cubic yards, of which 92,055 yards had been accomplished in 1883. The dredging was novel in being removed through a conduit of iron pipe at a distance. The capabilities of delivery were extended to a distance of 1,200 feet, with possi- bilities of much further delivery. This system was found to be much cheaper than any other. The next requirements of the situation asked for dredging at the basin, the extension of fourteen foot water from the head of the jetties to the bridge allowing ships to reach the Oakland wharves, excavation of the tidal canal connecting San Leandro estuary with Oakland harbor and the payment of a portion of the award made by the state court to the owners of land con- demned for the purposes of this canal.
The failure of the government in 1884-5 to provide for a continuance of the work on the Oakland harbor was a grievous local disappointment and was followed by the almost certain and serious damage to the work already done. The original estimate of the improvement was $1,814,529.20, of which amount there had already been appropriated in June, 1885, $874,600. It was urged that the appropriation should be sufficient to meet the annual estimates and that meager appropriations prevented economical operations. At the (then) pres- ent rate of appropriations it would require ten years to complete the work, but only three or four years with liberal appropriations. The original depth before the improvements were begun was about three feet; now it was fourteen feet at the entrance. The money was applied to increase the tidal prism by continu- ing the dredging of the tidal basin and by the excavation of the San Leandro canal.
In May, 1885, the Oakland council passed an ordinance allowing the Alameda County Terminal Wharf and Warehouse Company to erect and maintain a wharf and warehouses from the western end of Powell street in Oakland town- ship to deep water in San Francisco bay; they were required to expend $15,000 the first year.
APPROPRIATIONS FOR OAKLAND HARBOR
1874
$100,000 1881
60,000
1875
100,000
1882
200,000
1876
75,000 1884
139,000
1878
80,000 1886
60,000
1879
60,000 1888
350,000
1880
60,000 1890
250,000
125
HISTORY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY
The old city wharf extended out 150 yards from Franklin and Webster streets in 1888 and was joined at the end by another wharf forming a hollow square. The new wharf being constructed early in 1889 consisted of three piers extending out almost as far as the old pier and far enough apart to allow dock- age along the sides and at the end. The old wharf was removed section by sec- tion as the new one was built.
In May, 1891, E. C. Sessions carried out his large project of dredging and docking in the harbor near Clinton station. A canal 1,200 feet long was dredged in the marsh where he owned a tract of about sixty acres. The canal alone cost about forty thousand dollars, and Mr. Sessions in all paid out about one hun- dred thousand dollars for the canal and wharf improvements.
Late in December, 1892, the government awarded two important dredging contracts in Oakland harbor-one for a semi-circular channel between four thousand and five thousand feet long, beginning at the Larue reservation and thence extending eastward past the cotton mills to the new San Leandro canal, and one for a canal twenty feet deep and about four thousand feet long, extend- ing from Webster street bridge westward toward the bay. There was involved in the two contracts about one hundred and twenty-two thousand dollars.
The important question of how Alameda and Oakland could unite on a plan for the improvement of the harbor and the construction of the tidal canal was duly considered by mass meetings, committee discussions and private confer- ences in November, 1896.
The plans for harbor improvement in 1897 were those presented by Colonel Suter and included a channel twenty feet deep to be carried well up toward the head of the estuary and the completion of the training walls. One new bridge was planned to take the place of the two old ones across the estuary.
The desideratum in 1900, it was realized, was the elaboration and comple- tion of the harbor so that ocean vessels of high draft and in large numbers could lie in safety at the wharves, or could ride at anchor in a land-locked and secure harbor. Until this improvement was an accomplished fact the city could not expect to take its share of the immense transport business which still went to San Francisco, nor be the real terminus of the trans-continental railways. In other words the great object of Oakland at this time was to bring together ship and car at the wharves and docks of the city. In the fall of 1900 work on the harbor progressed satisfactorily in the harbor proper, at the Alameda end, and at Sausul creek. The establishment at this time by Balfour, Guthrie & Co., of docks, coal bunkers, warehouses, etc., and by Boole & Co., of a shipyard at the foot of Union street, showed that the improvements to the harbor were appre- ciated and that the work was bound to bear abundant fruit.
In January, 1901, the county board adopted resolutions, in accord with the report of Colonel Heuer, asking the government for a harbor channel twenty- five feet deep at low tide. This was the unanimous action of the supervisors. Congressman Metcalf at once prepared a bill to that effect.
The harbor improvement needed was a channel 500 feet wide and not less than twenty feet deep at low tide extending from deep water in San Francisco bay to Fallon street ; thence a channel 300 feet wide and seventeen feet deep to the tidal basin, and thence a channel entirely around the basin 300 feet wide and twelve feet deep, the estimated cost of which was $646,293. At this time
126
HISTORY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY
it became the consensus of opinion that a twenty-foot depth of channel would be insufficient for the requirements of commerce. When the harbor was planned in 1874 a twenty-foot depth was probably sufficient, but with the pas- sage of time came much larger vessels and accordingly a deeper channel was needed. Of the tonnage passing through Oakland harbor, eighty-nine per cent was trans-continental railway freight. No vessel drawing more than twenty feet could enter the harbor at low tide and had to be lightened outside in order to reach the wharves. This was an unnecessary and costly item. Or they could unload at Long wharf upon paying wharfage and tolls for hauling. The excavation of a channel twenty-five feet deep and 500 feet wide from the bay to Fallon street, and thence 300 feet wide and the same depth to and around the basin was estimated to cost $1,687,818. The excavation of the tidal canal by the Atlantic Gulf and Pacific Company was rapid and satisfactory. Their con- tract with the government called for the removal of 1,000,000 cubic yards of earth per month. Late in 1901 the Southern Pacific handled over one hundred car loads of earth daily from the excavations.
In January, 1902, the board of public works adopted the following at the request of the board of trade: Whereas, the business of Oakland harbor has very materially increased during the last few years; and Whereas, the draught of vessels has also been increased necessitating deeper water in the waterways; and Whereas, the Oakland harbor, owing to its shallow depth, is unable to accon- modate the shipping interests at this port, therefore be it Resolved, That this board request the mayor of the city of Oakland to wire Congressman Metcalf to use his best efforts for the furtherance of the Rivers and Harbors bill now before the congressional committees to obtain an appropriation for the deepen- ing of the Oakland harbor to a depth of twenty-five feet at low tide.
The Leavitt bill in the Legislature early in 1907 provided for the creation of a board of harbor commissioners for the Oakland water front.
During 1907 the Southern Pacific Company reclaimed a large area of land south of the broad-gauge mole with a new ferry slip and expansive dock. The Western Pacific Company reclaimed an immense area and prepared generally for the terminal ferry which was to be ready as soon as the western end of its trans-continental road was put in operation. It also reclaimed from the marshes of the inner harbor about one hundred and thirty acres.
At the close of 1907 the enormous progress in harbor improvement was manifest. Lumber yards and mills lined the water front for miles; several new wharves and docks had been built; the lumber fleet had nearly doubled in one year; one wharf was long enough to accommodate nine vessels lying end to end, with nineteen feet depth of water at low tide. The government was well advanced on the work of dredging the channel to a depth of twenty-five feet at low tide. Thus in line was a harbor with a channel 500 feet wide and deep enough for any merchant vessel entering San Francisco bay.
It was apparent in 1908-9 that, owing to increased cost in various improve- ment lines, the old continuing contract for harbor funds from the government was inadequate to complete the project as had been contemplated. It was esti- mated that from $400,000 to $500,000 more than had been expected would be needed. The sum available on December 31, 1908, of funds appropriated was $141,545. and the amount remaining to be appropriated which had been auth-
Ț
THE LAND-LOCKED SOUTH HARBOR OF OAKLAND
ALASKA FISHING FLEET WINTERING IN SOUTH HARBOR, OAKLAND
127
HISTORY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY
orized under the acts of 1905 and 1907 was $255,000. Outstanding obliga- tions amounted to $244,108, leaving available for future operations $153,436.
Early in 1909 Congressman Knowland secured an appropriation of $256,000 for the continued improvement of the Oakland harbor; he managed to have this measure attached to the Sundry Civil Appropriation bill.
In February, 1909, the county board authorized the city of Oakland to proceed with the annexation of about six square miles of the water front and tide lands in the western part of the city between the long wharf and Berkeley as a part of the general scheme for the improvement of Oakland harbor.
By November, 1910, the Government had spent in round numbers $3,500,000 on the Oakland channel and harbor and was virtually under pledge to dredge the channel to a depth of thirty feet at low tide and a width of 500 feet from ship channel in the bay to the line of Fallon street.
In 1911 the new project under which Oakland harbor improvements were carried on provided for a channel thirty feet deep and 500 feet wide from the bay to the tidal basin, for a channel twenty-five feet deep and 300 feet wide around the tidal basin, and for a channel eighteen feet deep along the tidal basin. The plan was to build the thirty-foot channel at once, and to add the other improve- ments when needed. In 1910 $250,000 was appropriated to commence operations.
What determined the board of engineers at Washington to approve the thirty- foot channel project was the fact that such a channel had been granted to Los Angeles and San Diego, neither of which had as large an annual harbor tonnage as Oakland. This fact, when presented to the board, caused it to reverse its former action and to approve the recommendations of Colonel Biddle. The amount of commerce was the paramount item of importance when seen by Congress. In addition Congress looked with greatest favor on those localities which were willing to assist in any water or harbor improvement project, and thus regarded Oakland which had authorized a bond issue of $2,500,000 for harbor improvements. Previous to 1911 Alameda had done nothing for its harbor, but late in the year the mayor of that city appointed a board of harbor commissioners which began action.
Succeeding the authorization of the bond indebtedness late in 1909, the Liv- ingstone street concrete pier wharf was soon completed, but other projected improvements with that fund were held up. But work on the western water front was commenced-the Key Route basin. Still by January, 1914, the city was but little nearer deep water navigation and commerce than if the voters back in 1909 had not authorized prompt work to secure that result.
In 1870 the project of a bridge across San Antonio creek between Oakland and Alameda was considered by the Legislature, but was bitterly opposed by residents of Brooklyn who thought it would obstruct navigation and thus interfere with the prospects of their town. However, the bill became law and the Webster street bridge was constructed. In this matter, at the meeting of the council, Mr. Spaulding offered the following resolution :
"Whereas, It has come to the knowledge of this council that there is dissatis- faction among the residents and property owners of Brooklyn and San Antonio respecting the action taken by this council in the matter of giving their sanction for the passage of a law for the construction of a bridge at the foot of Webster street to connect with Alameda; and
Vul. 1-9
128
HISTORY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY
"Whereas, It is not the wish nor desire of Oakland or its representatives to obstruct or in any way to impede the progress of our neighboring towns; therefore be it
"Resolved, That the citizens of Brooklyn, San Antonio and Alameda, by their representatives, be requested to meet this council at their rooms to show wherein or how they will be injured or benefited by the construction of a bridge at the point above named."
This special meeting was called, but in the meantime a protest was received from Brooklyn township. A meeting of the citizens and property owners of Brooklyn township, held at Swett's hall, unanimously adopted the following resolution :
"That it is the opinion of this meeting that the construction of a bridge over the San Antonio creek will be detrimental to the inhabitants of Brooklyn township in an eminent degree; also injurious to the interests of the county in general, by the creation of a very costly structure to be foisted upon the county at great expense for the care and keeping the same in repair." A printed protest was also received from thirty-three citizens of Oakland to the following effect : "The under- signed hereby protest against the erection of a bridge across San Antonio creek, as is now proposed by parties in Alameda. In our estimation a bridge would seriously obstruct navigation and impose unnecessary expense upon Oakland. We would suggest that the proposed connection, if necessary, be made solely at the expense of residents of Alameda, and by road and ferry only in accordance with the original proposition." On February 28th citizens of Alameda and Brooklyn being present were invited to express their views on the bridge question. The following resolution was then passed, "That the city clerk be authorized to communicate with Calvin Brown, George E. Gray and A. F. Rogers and ask them to give this council, on or before Monday, March 7, 1870, their opinion of the effect of the erection of a bridge across San Antonio creek, especially as effecting the depth of water therein; and that the opinion of any other scientific gentlemen on the subject who may favor us with the same will be cheerfully received." The bridge as then planned was 1,000 feet in length with a draw of 200 feet, and the cost was $25,000. Early in March, 1871, it was completed. On April 10th, an ordinance levying a special tax was passed, and a special levy of twenty-five cents on each $100 of property was ordered to be levied for the purpose of defraying the expense of the bridge.
On April 24, 1876, an ordinance was passed authorizing the construction of a bridge across the estuary of San Antonio between Eighth street and East Ninth street, and fixing the dimensions thereof. On the same date the name of Middle street was changed to Ninth street; and on November 27th the contract for building the Eighth street bridge was awarded to the Pacific Bridge Company, at $30,000.
The big new bridge across the tidal canal was dedicated January 23, 1892. There were long processions and various noisy demonstrations by both Alameda and Oakland. The speakers were Edward K. Taylor, city attorney of Alameda, and Hon. W. R. Davis of Oakland.
It was in August, 1910, that the grant by the harbor commission of 2,000 feet of the quay wall to be erected on the south side for the docking of deep water ships was made.
CHAPTER VIII
MILITARY AFFAIRS
A military company was organized at San Francisco in 1849, which in July had forty-one men, and in September numbered 100. It was named the First California Guard, and though intended for the artillery arm the men were drilled with muskets. The officers of this company were Captain H. W. Naglee; First Lieutenants William O. O. Harvard and M. Norton; Second Lieutenants Hall McAllister and David F. Bagley; Surgeon Samuel Gerry and Sergeant R. H. Sinton. The company retained its organization later under the laws of California, and is at present known as Company A, Light Battery, N. G. C. In 1850 it went to Sacramento to assist in quelling the squatters' riots and in its absence two other companies were organized which still belong to the N. G. C. About twenty more companies existed at the time that the war of the rebellion broke out in 1861.
There were in 1854 six companies at San Francisco formed into a battalion. The militia of the metropolis has been called into active service on only three occasions, to wit : In 1856, during the existence of the vigilance committee, when they received orders to report to the Governor; in 1871, when several companies were despatched to Amador county to prevent a collision between miners and mill owners; and in 1877, during the three days' riots of the Kearney mob, when they were ordered to guard the armories and other property. The alacrity with which the officers, rank and file responded to the call of the legally constituted author- ities proved the usefulness of their organization.
The state was in 1850, pursuant to an act of the Legislature, partitioned into four military divisions with a major-general at the head of each, two brigades commanded by the respective brigadier-generals constitute one division. The com- mand-in-chief of the national guard was vested in the Governor, and the chief officers of the staff were the adjutant-general and quartermaster-general. San Francisco had a regularly organized brigade, and the first commander of the Second division was Major-General Dimond, afterward superintendent of the mint, now dead. There existed also a number of independent companies.
The territory on the Pacific .was constituted by order of the President of the United States in 1849-50, the Third division of department No. II ; but in 1851 the commands of departments No. 10 and II were merged in that of the Pacific division, and Brevet Brigadier-General Ethan A. Hitchcock became its chief, with headquarters at Sonoma ; he was afterward Secretary of the Interior under Presi- dent Mckinley. In February, 1854, Major-General John E. Wool took the command.
At the time the Civil war began the only fortifications on the coast of Cali- fornia and Oregon were Alcatraz and Fort Point. At Alcatraz were 130 men under Captain Stewart. Fort Point was not occupied till February, 1861, when 160 artillerymen were stationed there, whose officers were Lieutenants Kellogg,
129
130
HISTORY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY
Kip and Shinn and Quartermaster Gibson. Ten thousand stands of arms and 150,000 cartridges were transferred from Benicia to Alcatraz. In the vicinity of San Francisco were about five hundred men. The whole force stationed in the department consisted of 3,650, of whom 1,725 were in California, and 1,925 in Oregon and Washington. On the 19th of April, 1861, Brigadier-General Edwin V. Sumner relieved Albert Sidney Johnston. His first general order had the true ring of loyalty to the national government, awakening confidence in the hearts of loyal citizens.
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.