USA > Connecticut > Fairfield County > Greenwich > Ye historie of ye town of Greenwich, county of Fairfield and State of Connecticut, with genealogical notes on the Adams. > Part 6
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45 | Part 46 | Part 47 | Part 48 | Part 49 | Part 50 | Part 51 | Part 52 | Part 53 | Part 54 | Part 55 | Part 56 | Part 57
2nd. The grand jury of the said county has taken cog- nizance of the said Purdy's laying stones in said river. which were for the foundation of said dam. or bridge, and have found a bill of indictment against him therefor, as a common nuisance to his Majesty's subjects. Upon which indictment the same is to be tried in the county court to be held in Fairfield in said county on the third Tuesday of November next, and that preceding said suit of our Lord, the King, the proceedings to encourage said Purdy to go on and build would be veratious. 3rd. That to give approbation to the said Purdy to go on with the work will involve the town in the same trespass as the said Purdy is in and expose it to answer all damages and be at all the expense of re- moving the nuisance and lay it liable to the public resentments.
Benjamin Brush. Edward Brush.
Henry Bush. John Crawford.
Nathaniel Finch.
Abraham Hays.
Jonathan Hobby.
Jonathan Hobby. Jr.
Epenetus Holmes.
Isaac Holmes. Samuel Mills. Jr.
John Palmer. John Palmer. Jr. John Palmer. 3rd.
Justus Palmer.
Messenger Palmer.
Nathaniel Sackett.
James Winans.
This bridge, together with the mill, was carried away by a freshet in 1787. and the town regranted to the then owners of the mill privileges the right to rebuild the same as follows:
62
Ye Historie of Ye Town of Greenwich
Whereas application hath been made to the selectmen of said Greenwich by William, John, Samuel and Daniel Titus owners of the mills lately carried off by a freshet from the Mianus River in said Greenwich, to call a town meeting that the inhabitants may take into their consideration the proposals made by the said Tituses, provided the town give them liberty and a grant to build mills on that part of Mianus River where Purdy began a dam across near Captain Nathaniel Peck in said Greenwich, which proposals are as followeth :
Ist. The said mills to be built on said Purdy's old dam under the same restrictions as to grinding for the public as the mills above were.
2nd. To lay out public landings each side of the river below the new dam as far as may be deemed necessary for the use of the public and to erect and keep in repair a sufficient dock on each side of the river, which shall be done by them, their heirs and assigns, as long as they or any of them occupy said mills.
3rd. The flood-gate shall be so constructed as to open something in the form of a field gate for the convenience of vessels, and a crane shall be erected for the purpose of hoist- ing boats and swinging them over the dam by the said Tituses, their heirs, and as in the second article.
4th. They will also erect a good and sufficient horse- bridge across said river and keep it in repair on or near said dam, and likewise a good scow will be kept in the mill-pond for the use of the public at all times, they giving one day's notice previous to the wanting of it.
Wherefore and with the advice of the civil authority of said town, notice is hereby given and the inhabitants of the Town of Greenwich are hereby warned to attend a town meeting at the meeting house in the West Society in said Greenwich on Monday the fifteenth instant October at two o'clock in the afternoon for the purpose of considering and discussing and granting or voting anything relative thereto, that they shall judge expedient, and the said John, Samuel and Daniel, with the assistance of Colonel Thomas Hobby, Jonah Ferris, Nathaniel Mead, Jonathan Coe and Abraham Hays, are hereby empowered to notify all the in- habitants by reading to the legal voters in the hearing of their families.
At the special meeting held on the fifteenth day of Oc-
63
Mill at Mianus Landing
tober, 1787, in pursuance with the foregoing notice, the foregoing petition was read and discussed and the meeting voted to grant the prayer of the petitioners with these altera- tions and restrictions :
That instead of a horse and foot bridge mentioned in the petition, the petitioners are to erect and maintain a sufficient cart bridge across said river which together with the mills and other articles enumerated in their propositions are to be com- pleted within four years from the date of this grant, and that Messrs. John Mackay, Jabez Fitch and Seth Palmer (the present selectmen), with Messrs. Samuel Peck, Samuel Lock- wood, Jr., Nehemiah Mead, Abraham Mead and William Bush, be a committee to covenant with the petitioners in be- half of the town for the purpose of conveying the right of this town to the premises unto the petitioners, and to ascertain the dimensions of the landing places proposed in said petition, and that said committee go out at the expense of the petitioners, and that what said committee or the major part of them shall covenant and contract in behalf of this town shall stand good and firm as if the same were done at this meeting, and that should the petitioners fail in their engagements with said com- mittee, the privileges hereby granted to them will revert to the town.
The following persons protested against the proceedings of the above meeting with respect to said town granting away the privileges of the Mianus River to the Messrs. Titus to set a mill on, agreeable to their request by petition:
Peter Gauff. Messenger Palmer.
Stephen Marshall.
Seth Palmer.
Denham Palmer.
Stephen Palmer.
John Palmer. Daniel Reynolds.
John W. Palmer.
Jeremiah Rundle.
Peter A. Burtus and Company were the successors in in- terest of the Messrs. Titus, and at a town meeting held on the twenty-seventh day of December, 1796, it was voted "that on condition that Peter A. Burtus and Company make the present town dock adjoining their mill eight feet front bigger than it was according to covenant with the Tituses, which is
64
Ye Historie of Ye Town of Greenwich
thirty feet, and then the town dock will be thirty-eight feet in front, in which case said Burtus and Company is to have an addition of fourteen feet in front southerly from the original grant."
After the old building on the west side of the river, near the bridge, was abandoned for mill purposes, it was bought by A. J. Finney in 1884 and converted into a general country store, and was used as such until it was destroyed by fire on the seventeenth day of March, 1897.
At a special town meeting held on the sixteenth day of August, 1890, it was:
RESOLVED, that the selectmen be and they hereby are authorized and empowered to convey by proper deed such right, or rights, as the town may have in and to a certain piece of land on the easterly side of the Mianus River at Mianus, now occupied by Edwin N. Scofield, and such right, or rights, as said town may have in or to any water rights of the Mianus River on the westerly side of said river, and op- posite to said land now occupied by said Edwin N. Scofield. Said premises and rights to be conveyed for factory purposes, and when the same shall cease to be used for such purposes the same shall revert to the town.
I On the twelfth day of October, 1710, Rev. John Jones, who had been the settled minister of the First Society for seven months, brought suit for his salary. The General Assembly allowed him £20.
On the ninth day of May, 1728, the Colonial Legislature passed an act creating a probate court at Stamford, as fol- lows: "There shall be a court of probate held at Stamford for the towns of Stamford, Greenwich and Ridgefield, to be held by one judge and clerk, with powers and privileges and fees as the other courts have in this colony. Appeals where allowable shall be made to the Superior Court in the County of Fairfield." Prior to this the probate court was at Fair- field.
At the time the Rev. Thomas Prince was collecting ma- : Original Documents, Ecclesiastical Records, vol. ii., pp 26-30.
65
Letter Written in 1729
terial in 1729 for the Chronological History of New England, he received, in answer to one of his circulars, the following communication from the Rev. Stephen Munson, minister of the Second Congregational Church at Horseneck (Borough of Greenwich), dated August 12, 1729, as appears from the Collections of the Connecticut Historical Society:
Mr. Robert Feacks and Daniel Patrick from Massa- chusetts, in 1640, made a purchase of Greenwich from the na- tives, and settled under the government of New Netherlands. They were incorporated and vested with town privileges by Peter Stuyvesant, Governor of New Netherlands. In 1665 this town falling within the bounds of Connecticut, a grant of it was obtained from that colony of the town to eight persons on condition that they would maintain an orthodox minister among them.
These grantees being sensible of their inability to perform the condition resigned their rights that others might come in and share with them in the lands and that they might be able to support the gospel among them. About the year 1680, the eldest part of the town being much increased, many of the inhabitants moved over the river, called Mianus, and set- tled in the village commonly called Horseneck in English. and in Indian, Paihomsing. Here a society was formed for the settling of an orthodox minister among us, and here the town is now principally settled.
Many difficulties arose, which prevented the settlement of the ministery among them until the year 1717, when the Rev. Richard Sackit was ordained Nov. 27. The number of males in the church when first gathered were seven. He died very suddenly May 7, 1727. He was well on the Sabbath, May 6, and preached all day, and on Monday night following departed this life, leaving his church then consisting of ten males. On May 29. 1728, Mr. Stephen Munson was or- dained pastor in the church at Horseneck.
There was in this part of the town called Horseneck a very bloody battle fought between the Dutch and Indians in the year 1646, where the Dutch with much difficulty obtained the victory. Great numbers were slain and their graves remain unto this day appearing like many little small hills.
The earthquake in 1727 was felt here, tho' not so ter- ribly as in some other places.
There was a very mortal sickness in town the same year.
5
66
Ye Historie of Ye Town of Greenwich
On the thirty-first day of May, 1731, the following in- habitants1 residing in the northeasterly part of the town served notice on the Horseneck Society, now the Second Congregational Church, of their intention to withdraw from said society and form the Stanwich Society, and the presen- tation of a petition to the General Assembly asking leave to form such a society:
Austin, Jonathan.
Hurley, Samuel.
Brush, Benjamin.
Knapp, Benjamin.
Brush, John.
Knapp, David.
Brush, Stephen.
Knapp, Joseph.
Callory, Thomas.
Lockwood, Hezekiah.
Clark, James.
Mead, Joshua.
Cliven (?), Jonathan.
Mow, John.
Cross, John.
Palmer, Joseph.
Ferris, John.
Palmer, Samuel.
Ferris, Nathaniel.
Platt, Benoni.
Ferris, Peter.
Smith, Henry.
Finch, Jonathan.
Taylor, Charles.
Hubert, Abraham.
Wansworth, Abraham.
Hubert, Daniel.
The following inhabitants residing in the northwesterly part of the Town of Stamford served a similar notice on the Stamford Society :
Briggs, Daniel.
Newman, Jonathan.
Choster, Daniel.
Newman, Nathaniel.
Conklin, Timothy.
Newman, Thomas.
Cory, Thomas.
Smith, David.
Dibble, George.
Smith, Ebenezer.
Guernsey, John.
Smith, Samuel.
Ingersoll, John.
White, John.
Ingersoll, Nathaniel.
White, Stephen.
Ingersoll, Simon.
Wooster, Ebenezer.
Newman, John.
After the meeting-house was raised the following petition was sent to the General Assembly :3
* From Original Documents, Ecclesiastical Records, vol. iii., pages 7 to 27, State Library.
67
Stanwich Congregational Church
"1732, May II. Upon the memorial of George Dibble, Ebenezer Smith, Samuel Smith, and other inhabitants of Stamford and Horseneck, praying that this Assembly would set off the people living in Stamford and Horseneck within the bounds following, to be a parish by themselves; viz .: To begin at the eight-mile line, or division line between the Colony of Connecticut and the Province of New York, at the partition line between Stamford and Horseneck, and so to run easterly by said eight-mile line three miles, and westerly by said line one and one half miles, and to run southerly by said partition line between Stamford and Horseneck four miles, and thence parallel with said eight-mile line three miles into Horseneck and one and one half miles into Stamford." A committee was appointed to consider the circumstances of the people and place and whether a parish might be con- veniently had within the aforesaid place. On a favorable report of the committee to the session held in October of the same year the petition was granted, and it was resolved "that the parish be called and known by the name of Stan- wich with all parish powers and privileges that other parishes in this colony are by law endowed with."
CHAPTER VII.
KING GEORGE'S WAR, 1744-1748-FRENCH AND INDIAN WAR, 1754-1764-DR. AMOS MEAD-TIMOTHY REYNOLDS ---- TOWN SUPPLY OF POWDER-TOWN BUILDING-FIRST SOCIETY WITHOUT A SETTLED MINISTER-POPULATION , IN 1762-SCHOOL FUND OF 1762-NORWALK PROPOSED AS A COUNTY SEAT-CLAIM TO LANDS IN PENNSYLVANIA.
THE first half of the eighteenth century in this country was marked by the varying struggles between the English and French for supremacy on the border ground of the colo- nial settlements. The French, with a more persuasive policy, had made friends with the Indians more readily than the English, and, as early as 1737, attempted to use the ad- vantage thus gained by erecting a fort at Crown Point, then claimed as being within English territory. From this time until 1763, there was no settled peace between the two coun- tries, and the conflicts which ensued called for large forces from all the English colonial settlements.
While the Colony of Connecticut furnished more than her actual quota of men for active service in the various colonial wars: King William's War, 1689-1697; Queen Anne's War, 1702-1713; and King George's War, 1744-1748; still the author has been unable to find any record of any company, detachment, or squad of men having enlisted from the Town of Greenwich, except such as has been obtained from Hoadley's Colonial Records of Connecticut, and from the Collections of the Connecticut Historical Society, as follows:
68
69
King George's War KING GEORGE'S WAR, 1744-1748
Under an order of the fourteenth day of June, 1744, the following men entered the service:
Barton, Joseph, Jr.,
Burley, Ebenezer, Bush, Samuel, Callary, Morris,
Cavanaugh, Peter,
Disney, Charles,
Ferris, Caleb, Jr.,
Ferris, John, Jr.,
Ferris, Peter,
from Stanwich. from Horseneck.
Holmes, Benjamin,
Holy, Benjamin, Jr.,
Howe, Nathaniel,
Johnson, Samuel,
Mead, Zebediah,
Palmer, Enos,
Palmer, Isaac,
Perry, Samuel,
Reike (?), John,
from Horseneck. from Horseneck. from Stanwich. from Greenwich. from Horseneck. from Stanwich. from Stanwich. from Horseneck. from Horseneck. from Horseneck. from Horseneck.
Rich, John, Studwell, Nathaniel,
Tyler, Jehiel,
from Stanwich.
Whelpley, Jonathan, Jr., from Greenwich. from Horseneck. Williams, William, Mead, James, Ensign. The Assembly of June 19, 1746, re- solved to raise one thousand men (including officers) for an expedition against Canada, and James Mead was appointed and commissioned to be ensign of Captain Joseph Wooster's Company of Foot to be raised in Connecticut.
The town minutes during this period do not contain any data with reference to the military activities which the in- habitants participated in, owing to the organization of a regi- ment by the Colony of Connecticut for service in this war, although twenty-four men or more from the town were mustered into the service.
from Horseneck. from Greenwich. from Horseneck. from Horseneck. from Horseneck. from Horseneck.
from Horseneck. from Stanwich.
Griffis, Thomas,
70
Ye Historie of Ye Town of Greenwich
Peace was proclaimed in 1748, but it was of short dura- tion. The French renewed their claim to a great portion of the territory which had been ceded to Great Britain by the treaty of New Utrecht, and which had been confirmed by succeeding treaties. They were encroaching on the north and had erected a fort at Crown Point, and on the west were fast extending their line of forts from the St. Lawrence to the Mississippi, and had even encroached upon the borders of Virginia, and English traders were plundered and killed by the Indians at the instigation of the French. Active hostili- ties were commenced in 1755, and this war was known as the
FRENCH AND INDIAN WAR.
Connecticut was largely drawn upon for troops. Young men were pressed into the service, and as Greenwich, during the early part of the war, had no volunteer company, several of the inhabitants were pressed. James Green used to relate that while a company of young people, himself included among the number, were quietly enjoying themselves at the tavern, then kept by Henry Mead, they were surprised by a press-gang and several of them forced into the service, while he with a few others escaped through a window. Soon after this a volunteer company was raised and commanded by Captain Thomas Hobby, who was afterwards a colonel in the Continental Army. This company rendered active service in the campaigns of 1755, 1758, 1759, 1760, 1761, and 1762.
I The General Assembly in March, 1755, ordered the raising of one thousand men, to be divided into two regi- ments of six companies each, and empowered the governor to take measures for the raising of five hundred additional men, if it should become necessary. This additional force was raised about the end of August, 1755, in consequence of letters received from General Johnson, Commander-in-Chief of the colonial forces during the campaign of 1755. These companies were added to the two regiments already in the
I Collections of the Connecticut Historical Society, vols. ix. and x.
71
French and Indian War
field, probably three companies to each regiment. At about the same time the Assembly authorized the raising of two additional regiments, each to consist of seven hundred and fifty men, divided into nine companies. The Connecticut troops were under the command of Major-General Phineas Lyman of Suffield. At the battle of Lake George on the eighth day of September, 1755, the Lieutenant-General and Commander-in-Chief, Sir William Johnson of Warrensburgh, New York, was wounded, and the chief command thereupon devolved upon General Lyman.
The Greenwich Company, under the command of Captain Thomas Hobby, was included in the two latter regi- ments and was mustered into service during the month of September, 1755, and continued therein until the first week of December of the same year. The addresses of the men are not given on the printed roll, which contains the following names:
8TH COMPANY, 4TH REGIMENT.
Hobby, Thomas, Captain, of Greenwich. Holly, Nathan, Ist Lieutenant. Barnes, John, 2nd Lieutenant.
Sergeants.
Ferris, Peter,
Ferris, Reuben,
Sill, David, Stebbins, Josiah,
Betts, Nathan, Clerk.
Brooks, Jonathan, Drummer.
Corporals.
Benedict, Matthew, Scott, William,
Mead, Joseph, Whelpley, Daniel.
Privates.
Barnes, Thomas,
Chapman, Elisha,
Beay, Peter,
Cogswell, Edward,
Brunson, Jabez,
Danells, William,
Buckley, Andrew (?),
Deen, John,
Burch, Valentine, Elmer, David,
Chapel, Samuel,
Ferris, Samuel,
72
Ye Historie of Ye Town of Greenwich
Gates, Jonathan,
Pardey, Ebenezer,
Goodrich, Daniel,
Peck, Eliphalet,
Graham, Barnaby,
Peck, Joseph,
Hait, Gedion,
Peters, Joseph,
Hall, Jabez,
Reynolds, Sackett,
Hutchenson, Joseph,
Riggs,
Jarman, John,
Rockwell, Daniel,
Johnson, John, Jr.,
Rundle, Jacob,
Jones, James,
Rundle, Joseph,
Kelley, Morris,
Sillsberry, Jonathan,
Kenney, Jacob, Jr.,
Smith, -- ,
Lobdell,
St. John, James,
Lobdell, Ebenezer,
Tayler, Preserved,
Lockwood, Jeremiah,
Tharps, Daniel,
Mandor, Richard,
Tharps, Edward,
Martin, James,
Tryton, - -- > Tumbling, Elisha,
Mead, Gershom,
Mead (?), Nathaniel (?),
Tumbling, Stephen,
Messenger, Michael,
Walls, David,
Mojer, Enos,
Walter, Nathan,
Molatto, Simon,
Welch, James,
Moor, John,
White, David,
Nicklos, John,
White, Thomas,
Nortrup, Jabez,
Whitney, James,
Nortrup, William,
Willmoth, Zophar,
Nuel, -, Jr.,
Worden, Andrew.
Osburn, Aaron,
The General Assembly in February, 1756, resolved to raise two thousand and five hundred men, officers included, for the coming campaign, the forces to be divided into four regiments of eight companies each. In October, 1756, in consequence of a letter from the Earl of Loudon, the As- sembly resolved to raise eight additional companies, to be added to the four regiments already in the field as the ninth and tenth companies. It is probable that these companies were not raised owing to the lateness of the season. Half- pay from the seventeenth day of December, 1755, to the date of re-enlistment was allowed to the officers and soldiers who had served in the previous campaign, and a gratuity of one month's pay was granted to the officers and soldiers who had
73
French and Indian War
served in garrison during the winter. During the campaign of 1756, the Connecticut forces continued under the com- mand of Major-General Phineas Lyman, and the expedition was against Canada.
There was no company from Greenwich mustered into the service during this campaign, but many of those who served in Captain Hobby's Company the previous year re- enlisted in Captain David Waterbury's Company of Stam- ford. The printed roll contains the following names:
5TH COMPANY, 4TH REGIMENT.
Waterbury, David, 3rd, Captain, of Stamford. Ferris, Reuben, Ist Lieutenant. Lockwood, Timothy, 2nd Lieutenant.
Sergeants.
Finch, Jeremiah,
Smith, Isaac,
Knapp, Caleb,
Wardel, James,
Newman, John,
Whelpley, Daniel.
Slauson, Ebenezer,
Clerks.
Smith, Israel, Waterbury, Peter.
Corporals.
Crissey, Ebenezer,
Newman, David,
Willmoth, Francis, Drum-
Reynolds, Timothy, Centinel.
mer.
Privates.
Adams, John,
Davis, Hezekiah,
Delevand, John,
Ambler, Stephen, Ask, Thomas,
Denslow, Charles,
Astin, Lockwood,
Denslow, John,
Avery, Peter,
Ferris, Joseph,
Barley, David,
Ferris, Nathan,
Bates, Abraham,
Ferris, Pack,
Bea, Isack,
Gales, William,
Chapman, Daniel,
George, Thomas,
Cosher, Hezekiah,
Holly, John,
74
Ye Historie of Ye Town of Greenwich
Hubbard, Daniel,
Parmer, Samuel,
Jagger, Jeremiah,
Peck, John,
Jarman, John,
Perday, David,
Jessup, Nathaniel,
Reynolds, Ebenezer,
Johnson, William,
Reynolds, Ely,
Knapp, Ebenezer,
Reynolds, Titus,
Knapp, Jonas,
Rickey, John,
Knapp, Nehemiah,
Salar, Ezekiel,
Lockwood, Abraham,
Sellick, Jonathan,
Lockwood, Jeremiah,
Slauson, Isaac,
Lockwood, Moses,.
Slauson, Silvanus,
Lockwood, Samuel,
Slossman, Israel,
Mangrel, Richard,
Smith, Moses,
Mashel, Peter,
Steward, James,
Mashel, Silas,
Tharps, Edward,
Mead, James,
Webb, Jonathan,
Messenger, Michael,
Weed, Jonathan,
Moger, James,
Weed, Youngs,
Morgan, Joseph,
Williams, Charles,
Mow, John,
Winchel, Jonas,
Newman, David,
Wright, James.
Parmer, James,
The General Assembly in February, 1757, resolved to raise one thousand and four hundred men for the next campaign, to be formed into one regiment of fourteen com- panies, to act in conjunction with the regular troops under the command of the Earl of Loudon. In October, 1757, the Assembly ordered the enlisting of three companies of ninety-four men each, including officers, out of the troops already in the service, to remain in service through the winter. The Connecticut forces continued under the command of Phineas Lyman, whose military title for this campaign was Colonel. An alarm in August, at the time of the capture of Fort William Henry, called out many of the militia, which included Captain White's Company of Stanwich, 9th Regiment. The company marched to the relief of Fort William Henry and the parts adjacent thereto, and it was in service during the month of August, 1757. The printed roll contains the following names:
75
French and Indian War
White, Stephen, Captain, of Stanwich. Mead, Caleb, Lieutenant. Lockwood, Ezekiel, Ensign. Sergeants.
Lockwood, Nathaniel,
Holmes, Reuben, Johnson, Samuel, Whelpley, Daniel.
Perot, John, Clerk. Corporals.
Austin, Job,
Brown, Bezaleel,
Ferris, Samuel, Jurden, John.
Privates.
Ackerly, Felix,
Mead, Elijah,
Bard, Roberts,
Mead, Henry,
Coe, Joseph,
Mead, Jesse,
Cross, Nathaniel,
Mead, Joseph,
Ferris, Jabez,
Mead, Nathaniel,
Ferris, Peter,
Mead, Nathaniel, Jr.,
Ferris, Silvanus,
Newman, Ezra,
Green, James,
Newman, Isaac,
Green, Jeremiah,
Newman, Joseph,
Hait, Abraham,
Palmer, Denham,
Hartman, Christopher,
Pardee, David,
Hobby, Benjamin,
Partelo, Amos,
Hobby, John,
Peck, James,
Holly, Abraham,
Peck, Joseph,
Holly, Nathaniel,
Penoyr, Thomas,
Randall, Abraham,
Ingersoll, Simon,
Reynolds, Horton,
Jessup, Silvanus,
Reynolds, Reuben,
June (?), William,
Selleck, Thaddeus,
Knapp, David,
Smith, David,
Knapp, James,
Smith, Joshua,
Knapp, John,
Smith, Samuel,
Knapp, Joseph,
Smith, Whitman,
Lockwood, Nathan,
Todd, Abraham, Jr.,
Lyon, William,
Waring, James,
Marshall, John,
Webb, Benjamin,
Marshall, Mead,
Whiting, Ebenezer,
Mead, Benjamin,
Wilson, William,
Mead, Deliverance,
Wood, Halsted.
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.