USA > Iowa > Washington County > The history of Washington County, Iowa, its cities, towns, and c., a biographical directory of its citizens > Part 43
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45 | Part 46 | Part 47 | Part 48 | Part 49 | Part 50 | Part 51 | Part 52 | Part 53 | Part 54 | Part 55 | Part 56 | Part 57 | Part 58 | Part 59 | Part 60 | Part 61 | Part 62 | Part 63 | Part 64 | Part 65 | Part 66 | Part 67 | Part 68 | Part 69 | Part 70 | Part 71 | Part 72 | Part 73 | Part 74 | Part 75 | Part 76 | Part 77 | Part 78 | Part 79 | Part 80 | Part 81 | Part 82 | Part 83 | Part 84 | Part 85 | Part 86
334
HISTORY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY.
membrance of the slimy reptiles, after returning from the slaughter, inter- fered with the enjoyment of their frugal evening meal.
Wolves were very numerous and troublesome. It was impossible to raise sheep, and hogs as well as larger animals were not safe from the at -* tacks of these gaunt and ferocious wild beasts. On account of their many and persistent depredations, as well as the fact that the State offered a pre- mium on their scalps, systematic and continued efforts were made by cer- tain individnals to capture them. In some instances poison was used, in other cases steel traps, and others had resort to their dogs and guns.
Joseph Adams, the first settler of Washington, was a mighty hunter. He says that in early days it was no unusual occurrence to see from forty to fifty deer within a radins of one mile from Washington. He never thought it worth his time to leave his blacksmith shop unless there was a fair pros- pect to bring down at least four or five deer. He regarded it a very easy task, at any time, to take his rifle and kill three or four deer. He gener- ally went on foot, and when a deer came in range it generally was his meat; it was immaterial whether the animal was standing still or running. Some- times, especially when there was snow on the ground, he would go on horseback, and when he killed a deer it was lashed to his horse's tail, and then, mounting the horse, the rider set out for further conquests. When another animal fell before the unerring aim of his rifle, it was tied on to the other deer, and sometimes he might be seen returning from the chase drag- ging three or four deer, all lashed to the caudal appendage of his horse.
David Goble, however spent more time in this manner than any other of the early settlers. Half of his time was probably spent in this way. He trapped and hunted along all the streams of the county, and sometimes would be gone days and even weeks. Sometimes he would start off on a still more extensive expedition np the Iowa River in search of beavers and be gone several weeks. Such trips he found to be profitable as well as in- teresting pastime. Mr. Hawthorn says, "game was plenty, such as deer, turkeys, prairie chickens and squirrels."
GROWTH OF THE COUNTY.
The official act of the Territorial Legislature naming Washington county and defining its boundaries, was approved January 25th, 1839. The first settlement was made in February, 1836. It will therefore appear that the county of Washington was not named and its boundaries defined until about three years after the first settlement. The Indians had left, and the whites had not yet appeared in large numbers. Although the county contained but few citizens, yet the white man had marked it for his own.
During these years the county was in an undefined state of existence, or non-existence. In one sense it was a county, in another it was not. It was for a while part of Wisconsin, and as such, constituted a part of Louisa county; then it was taken off from Louisa connty and called Slanghter county, but its boundaries, as well as its name, were not the same as what is now known as the county named and laid ont. So that, in point of fact, there was a region of territory described as Washington county, in the then unorganized State of Iowa, as early as January, 1838. There was no county organization proper, no county government, and not even many citizens for several months. In a few months, however, the new county gained citi-
335
HISTORY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY.
zens, but in other respects it continued for some time in the same unde- fined state.
The work of organization was only begun when the county was named and laid out. It remained to hold an election, and organize a county gov- ernment.
Thus the early settlers were for a time in a peculiar sitnation. They dwelt in, but were not properly citizens of, Washington county, since there were no county courts or other authority to control their actions, and they were still, in these respects, under the discipline of another county.
For judicial and other purposes the new county was still a part of another county, and so continued until its formal organization was completed. It does not appear that there was much call for the exercise of this authority, or that the loose and ill-defined county government produced any bad re- sults. "The laws are for those who need them," and the early settlers dwelt together in harmony that did not call for the interference of sheriff or judge. This is a somewhat remarkable feature of Washington county, and contrasts vividly with the early experience of some other counties.
The county seems to have prospered well during this period of loose, half- formed organization. The settlers were too busy with their own affairs to intermeddle with those of others, and so had little occasion to call for the authority of the law. But it was soon apparent that the business affairs- of the community called for a county organization. Roads should be laid ont, a county-seat located, and other preparations made for a thriving and prosperous future. So in 1839 the county was formally organized in the manner spoken of more fully under the head of " organization."
The people in the county at the time of the organization were mostly Germans or native-born Americans, and from that time to the present the population has been mostly of that character. The county filled up steadily and rapidly. Nearly always the new-comers were poor in purse. Few men of means came to Washington county in the early days. But, although they came almost without exception poor in pocket, they brought with them industry, economy and intelligence, so that, in the course of years, wealth has been the result. The growth of the country never slackened or came to a stand-still, except for a very short time, but continued steadily year by year. The brunt of the pioneer battle was borne by the very early settlers, for within a few years the great hardships of pioneer life had dis- appeared, and the people lived in comfort.
At the time of organization in 1839 there were about 300 inhabitants. In 1840 there were 1,571; in 1844, 3,120; and in 1846, when the Territory became a State, and the county had completed its first decade, dating from the first settlement, it contained a population of 3,483. The population of the county, given biennially, was as follows: 1847, 3,518; 1849, 4,484; 1851, 5,079; 1853, 7,560; 1856, 11,113; 1859, 13,366; 1860, 14,235; 1863, 15,003; 1865, 15,739; 1867, 17,675; 1867, 18,648; 1870, 18,952; 1873, 18,975; 1875, 19,269. The number of inhabitants at the present time, 1880, will aggregate about 20,500.
Thus, from the very first, the history of the county shows a steady career of thriving, prosperous growth. The following table of important events shows the general land-marks of the county's career and history from the beginning to the present time:
336
HISTORY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY.
TABLE OF EVENTS.
First settler, Adam Richey, February, 1836.
Oldest settler still residing on his original claim, William Moore.
County named and boundaries defined, January 25, 1839.
Washington located June, 1839.
County formally organized, 1839.
First white child born, Isabella Ritchey, June 12, 1837.
First marriage, John Hulick and Nancy Goble, 1837.
First term of court in and for the county of Slaughter, May 7, 1838; in and for the county of Washington, June 17, 1839.
First land entered, September 11, 1839, by Matthew Moorhead.
First land transfer, December 31, 1839, C. D. Haskell to Abraham Owen.
First real estate mortgage, October 3, 1839, Matthew Moorhead to David Bunker.
First chattel mortgage, December 14, 1839, Daniel Powers to Allen Phillips.
First mill erected, 1838-'39, by Holcomb & Bullock.
First newspaper published, "The Argus," 1854.
First mail received at Washington, March 10, 1839.
Gold excitements, 1849, 1859, 1876.
Old court-house built, July, 1841.
Celebration of the completion of the first railroad to Washington, Sep- tember 1, 1858.
This brief table represents a large amount of history, and will be very in- structive to those who may "ponder it fittingly."
Speaking generally, the growth of the county has been steady and con- tinuous, although there have been, of course, times of ebb and flow. The first period of the county's growth was one of much hardship and priva- tion. The California emigration, however, brought golden days to the county, and prosperity continued in high tide until the panic a few years before the war. These were evil days for Washington county; there was very general discontent, and many business men in the county were ruined. A slow recovery followed and introduced the war-period. From the close of the war up to the panic in 1873, Washington was again in a prosperous condition. The county did not suffer in this directly so much as indirectly, in the general derangement of the business of the country. But the expe- rience was much the same as that in the former period of high times. Property depreciated and become unsalable, and general discontent and un- easiness spread among the people. There has been nothing peculiar to Washington county in this experience-it has been that of the country in general. At the present time the country is fairly started again on a career of prosperity.
So, in Washington county, good times have followed close upon evil times, and vice versa all through the period of. its growth. It would seem that the old sage's thonght would be a good thing to keep ever in mind, both in prosperity and distress: "Even this shall pass away." Such a lesson is taught by the experience of the county, from the organization to the present time.
Having thus definitely, and as fully as the records permit, noted the early
337
HISTORY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY.
settlements and the development of the county in its first stages we come to the matter of
COUNTY ORGANIZATION.
It was not long after the first settlement of Washington county before the necessity of county organization in the interests of good government, good roads and the proper management of other local affairs was fully ap- preciated and agitated. Indeed, steps were taken toward organization dur- ing the year 1838, but were not fully carried out for some time thereafter.
With regard to the origin of dividing individual States into county and township organizations, which, in an important measure, should have the power and opportunity of transacting their own business and governing themselves, under the approval of, and subject to, the State and general government of which they each formed a part, we quote from Elijah M. Haines, who is considered good authority on the subject.
In his "Laws of Illinois, Relative to Township Organizations," he says: "The county system, originated with Virginia, whose early settlers soon be- came large landed proprietors, aristocratic in feeling, living apart in almost baronial magnificence on their own estates, and owning the laboring part of the population. Thus the materials for a town were not at hand, the voters being thinly distributed over a great area.
"The county organization, where a few influential men managed the whole business of the community, retaining their places almost at their pleasure, scarcely responsible at all, except in name, and permitted to con- duct the county concerns as their ideas or wishes might direct, was more- over consonant with their recollections or traditions of the judicial and social dignities of the landed aristocracy of England, in descent from whom the Virginia gentlemen felt. so much pride. In 1834 eight counties were organized in Virginia, and the system, extending throughout the State, spread into all the Sonthern States, and some of the Northern States; unless we except the nearly similar division into 'districts' in South Carolina, and that into 'parishes' in Louisiana, from the French laws.
"Illinois, which, with its vast additional territory, became a county of Virginia, on its conquest by General George Rogers Clark, retained the county organization, which was formerly extended over the State by the constitution of 1818, and continued in exclusive use until the constitution of 1848.
"Under this system, as in other States adopting it, most local business was transacted by those commissioners in each county, who constituted a county court, with quarterly sessions.
"During the period ending with the constitution of 1847, a large portion of the State had become filled up with a population of New England birth or character, daily growing more and more compact and dissatisfied with the comparatively arbitrary and inefficient county system. It was main- tained by the people that the heavily populated districts would always control the election of the commissioners to the disadvantage of the more thinly populated sections-in short that under that system, 'equal and exact justice' to all parts of the county could not be secured.
"The township system had its origin in Massachusetts, and dates back to 1635.
"The first legal enactment concerning this system, provided that, whereas,
338
HISTORY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY.
'particular townships have many things which concern only themselves, and the ordering of their own affairs, and disposing of business in their own town,' therefore, 'the freeman of every township, or a majority part of them, shall only have power to dispose of their own lands and woods, with all the appurtenances of said town, to grant lots, and to make such orders as may concern the well-ordering of their own towns, not repugnant to the laws and orders established by the General Court.'
"They might also (says Mr. Haines), impose fines of not more than twenty shillings, and 'choose their own particular officers, as constables, surveyors for the highways, and the like.'
"Evidently this enactment relieved the general court of a mass of mu- nicipal details, without any danger to the power of that body in controling general measures of public policy.
"Probably also a demand from the freemen of the towns was felt for the control of their own home concerns.
"The New England Colonies were first governed by a 'general court,' or legislature, composed of a governor and a small council, which court con- sisted of the most influential inhabitants, and possessed and exercised both legislative and judicial powers, which were limited only by the wisdom of the holders.
"They made laws, ordered their execution by officers, tried and decided civil and criminal causes, enacted all manner of municipal regulations, and, in fact, did all the public business of the colony.
"Similar provisions for the incorporation of towns were made in the first constitution of Connecticut, adopted in 1639; and the plan of township organization, as experience proved its remarkable economy, efficiency and adaptation to the requirements of a free and intelligent people, became uni- versal throughont New England, and went westward with the emigrants from New England into New York, Ohio, and other Western States."
Thus we find that the valuable system of county, township and town organizations had been thoroughly tried and proven long before there was need of adopting it in Iowa, or any of the broad region west of the Missis- sippi river. But as the new country soon began to be opened, and as east- ern people continued to move westward across the mighty river, and form thick settlements along its western shore, the Territory, and State, and county, and township and town organizations soon followed in quick suc- cession, and those different systems became more or less modified and im- proved, accordingly as deemed necessary by the experience and judgment and demands of the people, until they have arrived at the present stage of advancement and efficiency.
In the settlement of the Territory of Iowa the legislature began by or- ganizing counties on the Mississippi. As each new county was formed it was made to include, under legal jurisdiction, all the country bordering west of it, and required to grant to the occidental settlers electoral privi- ileges and an equal share in the county government with those who prop- erly lived in the geographical limit of the county. The counties first or- ganized along the eastern border of this State were given, for a short time, jurisdiction over the lands and settlements adjoining each on the west, until these different localities became sufficiently settled to support organizations of their own; and finally, at the first session of the legislature, after the Indians sold out the newly-acquired territory, including all northwestern Iowa, was laid off into counties, provisions were made for their respective
339
HISTORY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY.
organizations when the proper time should arrive, and these were severally named.
Thus Keokuk and Mahaska counties were originally attached to Wash- ington county for judicial, revenue and election purposes, and previous to that time Washington connty had been attached to Louisa county in the same way.
The subsequent subdivision of territory into separate and distinct conn- ties was not the work of a day. It was in the interests of the older coun- ties to retain the territory attached to them, and the movement to detach territory and form new counties usually originated with the settlers living in these sparsely settled regions. Of course these movements were not successful at first, and sometimes were frequently thwarted. The civil or- ganization of that portion of country now known as Washington county has been changed four times. First it was a part of Des Moines county; second, it was a part of Louisa county; third, it was Slaughter county; and fourth, it became Washington county.
First. That part of Iowa included in the Black Hawk purchase, together with Wisconsin, was attached to Michigan Territory. This was effected by act of Congress passed in June, 1834. In September, 1834, the Territorial legislature of Michigan subdivided the Iowa district into two counties, for municipal purposes. These two counties were named, respectively, Du- buque and Des Moines, and the country now embraced within the bounds of Washington county, or so much of it as belonged to the United States, be- came a part of Des Moines county. It was a part of Flint Hills township which extended east to the Mississippi river and south to Missouri. The township contained about 3,000,000 acres of land, and was probably the largest election precinct on record. The first election was held on the first Monday of November, 1834. The place of voting was at Flint Hills, now Burlington. The people of Washington, in order to have voted, would have been compelled to go a distance of more than, fifty miles; but none went, because there were none. Thus was the voter of Washington county spared the expense and trouble of going so far to cast his ballot by coming later in the century.
Second. In 1836 Michigan became a State, with its present boundaries. The territory west and southwest, which heretofore had been attached to Michigan for municipal purposes, was then organized into a separate terri- tory and called Wisconsin. At the first session of the Wisconsin legisla- ture, held at Belmont, October, 1836, an act was passed subdividing Des Moines county into seven new counties. One of the counties thus provided for was Louisa, and its boundaries defined as follows:
"Beginning on the Mississippi river, at the northeast corner of Des Moines county; thence up said river twelve miles above the month of the Iowa river; thence west to the Indian boundary line; thence with said boundary line to the northwest corner of Henry county; and thence with the line of the same to the northwest corner of Des Moines county; and thence east with the same to the place of beginning."
From the foregoing it will be seen that Louisa county as organized under the provisions of that law, included within its limits the country now com- posing Washington county, or so inuch of it as belonged at that time to the United States.
Third. The second session of the Wisconsin legislature was held at Bur- lington, during the winter of 1837-'38, at which time an act was passed
340
HISTORY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY.
providing for the organization of a new county, ont of the western part of Louisa county. At that time William B. Slaughter was secretary of the territory, and in his honor the county thus to be organized was named "Slaughter." The act defining the boundaries of the new county, fixing its name and locating the seat of justice, reads as follows:
"The county included in the boundaries, to-wit: Beginning at the north- east corner of the county of Henry, thence west to the northwest corner of the same, thence north to the township line, dividing townships seventy-six and seventy-seven north, thence east with the said line, to the line between ranges four and five west, thence south with said line to the place of begin- ning, is hereby set off into a separate county, by the name of Slaughter, and the seat of justice of said county is hereby established at the town of Astoria; and all the territory west is hereby attached to the county of Slaughter for judicial purposes."
The boundaries of the county, as defined upon the organization of "Slaughter," were not the same as the present boundaries of Washington county, but they included a larger part of what is now Washington county and nearly all of what was at that time settled.
Fourth. In 1838 the Territory of Wisconsin was divided, the Territory of Iowa fornied and an election of territorial officers ordered. The legisla- ture chosen at this election met the following winter, at which time an act was passed changing the name of Slaughter to that of Washington, and the new boundary lines then defined, were the same as those which now include the county of Washington, except in the northeastern part of the county where a change was afterward made, that part east of the Iowa having been taken off and attached to Johnson county.
The act substituting the name of Washington for that of Slanghter, and defining the boundaries of the county, reads as follows:
"AN ACT to establish the boundary lines of Washington, and for other pur- poses:
"SECTION 1. Be it enacted by the Council and House of Representatives of the Territory of Iowa, that the county heretofore designated and known as the county of Slaughter, shall hereafter be called the county of Wash- ington, and that the boundary lines of said county are hereby established as follows: Beginning on the range line, between ranges five and six west, where the township line dividing townships seventy-three and seventy-four north, intersects said line, thence west with said township line to the line dividing ranges nine and ten west, thence north on the said line to the line dividing townships seventy-seven and seventy-eight north, thence east with said line to the line dividing ranges five and six west, thence south to the place of beginning.
"SECTION 2. That the said county of Washington shall to all intents and purposes, be and remain, an organized county, and invested with full power and authority to do and transact all county business, which any regularly organized county may of right do.
"SECTION 3. That John Gilliland, of the county of Louisa, and Thomas Ritchey, of the county of Henry, and William Chambers, of the county of Muscatine, are hereby appointed commissioners to locate and establish the seat of justice of said county of Washington, first being sworn by any judge or justice of the peace, faithfully and impartially to locate the seat of justice of said county, taking into consideration the future as well as the present population of the said county.
S. D. Miller
I
343
HISTORY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY.
"SECTION 4. The said commissioners, or a majority of them, shall meet at the town of Astoria, on the first day of June next, in pursuance of their duty under this act and proceed as soon thereafter as may be, to locate the said seat of justice, and so soon as they come to a determination, the same shall be committed to writing, signed by the commissioners and filed with the clerk of the district court of said county, whose duty it shall be to record the same and forever keep it on file in his office; and the place thus desig- nated shall be the seat of justice of said county; provided, that the seat of justice of said county is hereby temporarily established at the town of As- toria, until the said commissioners shall have located the seat of justice agreeably to this act.
"SECTION 5. That the said commissioners shall receive as a compensa- tion for their services the sum of three dollars per day, to be paid out of the treasury of the county.
"SECTION 6. That the territory west of Washington is hereby attached to said county for judicial purposes.
"SECTION 7. That this act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage."
During the time that this portion of the country was a part of Des Moines county the seat of justice was at Burlington and official business, had there been any, would have had to be transacted at that place, but there being no one living within the present bounds of Washington county at that time, the county-seat, though fifty miles distant was near enough. The same was true of the country at the time it was a part of Louisa county. There were probably a few settlers located on claims in the eastern part of the county prior to the passage of the act for the organization of Slaughter county, but only for a short time previous and they probably transacted no business at the county-seat of Louisa county, instituted no suits, and paid no taxes. Upon the organization of Slaughter county and for a year there- after the Indians were the sole inhabitants, with the exception of a few families in the east part of the county on Long creek, where the first set- tlers located. In 1838, however, as has already been seen, the county be- gan to settle up rapidly and the records of the official transactions of the inhabitants first began to be made. According to the provisions of the act organizing Slaughter county, the seat of justice was located at Astoria. This town was located in Oregon township, near and south of Ainsworth, by some said to have been on the farm afterward known as the McElharen farm. This town, as has already been mentioned, was laid out by three gen- tlemen from Mt. Pleasant, who had extravagant notions with regard to the future greatness of the town. Their prospective fortune realized out of the sale of town lots was never realized, and at the present time it would be al- most as difficult to find the site of Astoria as to determine the precise loca- tion of the Cities of the Plain. No plat of this town was ever put on record and but little is known of its history, if indeed it ever had any. Tradition informs us that the proprietors erected a log house about fifteen feet square which they called a court-house, but it was never completed as such and no court was ever held there. On Monday, the 7th day of May, 1838, the first district court was held in and for the county of Slaughter by David Irwin, judge of the second judicial district of Wisconsin territory. The court record says that it was held at Astoria, but from the best infor- mation which can be obtained, including the testimony of one individual
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.