USA > Kentucky > A history of Kentucky Baptists : From 1769 to 1885, including more than 800 biographical sketches, Vol. I > Part 48
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45 | Part 46 | Part 47 | Part 48 | Part 49 | Part 50 | Part 51 | Part 52 | Part 53 | Part 54 | Part 55 | Part 56 | Part 57 | Part 58 | Part 59 | Part 60 | Part 61 | Part 62 | Part 63 | Part 64 | Part 65 | Part 66 | Part 67 | Part 68 | Part 69 | Part 70
Soon after their secession from the Presbyterians, the New- lights published an apology, in which they set forth their dis- tinguishing tenets. They denied the position of the confession of faith in regard to the divine decrees, the atonement and the special influence of the spirit in producing faith. They main- tained that all creeds and confessions ought to be rejected, and that the Bible alone, without note or comment, should be the bond of christian fellowship.
On the 14th of June, 1804, Springfield Presbytery met at Cane Ridge, only nine months after its organization, and in a document, which they farcically enough, titled " The Last Will
C. C ce tic B Ma wer was of th Wor
conv lavy, Augu
525
-
Shaker Missionaries.
and Testament of the Springfield Presbytery." announced to the world the dissolution of that transitory body. The following ministers, of which it was composed, signed the "Will and Testament " as witnesses: Robert Marshall, John Dunlavy, Richard McNemar, B. W. Stone, John Thompson and David Purviance. To this document the witnesses appended an address, giving their reasons for dissolving the Presbytery. Soon after this, they adopted a congregational form of govern- ment for their churches, and assumed the name of THE CHRIS- TIAN CHURCH. In the spring of 1805, Matthew Houston, pas- tor of Silver Creek and Paint Lick Presbyterian churches, joined the Newlights. Malcom Worley had been set apart to the ministry among them. They were greatly encouraged, and, no doubt, anticipated the speedy dissolution of all the sects, and the union of all christians in the Christian Church, which was "founded on the New Testament alone." But they were doomed to speedy disappointment.
The Shakers at New Lebanon, New York, having heard of the dancing and other singular practices prevailing in the great revival, sent three of their members as missionaries to the west. They arrived in Kentucky, in March, 1805. Matthew Houston appears to have been their first convert, and his pop- ularity was such that he carried a number of his people with him. He was elevated to the office of Elder, and went about preaching. He pretended to have literally become " as a little child," and rode about on a hobby-horse, and performed other childish tricks. From Madison county, the Shakers went to Cane Ridge, in Bourbon county, here they were warmly re- ceived by Mr. Stone, and permitted to preach to his congrega- tion. This was in April. Mr. Stone sent a letter "by friend Bates " to Mr. McNemar, who now lived on Turtle Creek in Ohio. Coming thither, the Shakers introduced themselves to Malcom Worley, and through him, to Mr. McNemar, and were permitted to address the congregation, next day, which was Sabbath. By the 23d of May, they had formed a society he of thirty or forty members, among whom were McNemar and Worley. In June, they came to Eagle Creek, and made a few atconverts there; in July, they succeeded in winning over Dun. alavy, with twenty or thirty families under his influence. In Vil August, through the efforts of Matthew Houston, Samuel, - n
n-
nd
526
History of Kentucky Baptists.
Henry, and John Bonta, Elisha Thomas, and others, they ob- tained a foothold in the middle of Kentucky ; and a number of families embraced their views, and formed a community near Harrodsburg, in Mercer county.
These things could not fail to alarm the hitherto over san- guine Newlights. Stone and Thompson, especially, denounced the Shaker emissaries, in no mild terms, through the press, by letter, and at camp-meetings. At a general meeting at Con- cord, in August, four of their leaders, Thompson, Marshall, Stone and Purviance spoke freely against them in their dis- courses. A solemn council was held, which enjoined silence on Youngs, McNemar, Dunlavy and Worley, who were pres- ent, thus, as Youngs observed, "abusing their own light."
Meanwhile, Mr. Stone had published his views, in a series of letters on " The Atonement," early in the same year. Some of his positions were so shocking as ultimately to produce alarm and division in the ranks of his own people. Messrs. Marshall and Thompson returned to the Presbyterian church, in October, 1811. Of the five fathers of " the Christian church," Mr. Stone only remained faithful. McNemar and Dunlavy having gone to the Shakers some years before, he was now de- serted by Thompson and Marshall, who returned to the bosom of their first love.
In 1814, Mr. Stone published a bulky " Address to the Christian churches in Kentucky, Tennessee and Ohio." As in his letters on the Atonement, he had given his strength to the defense of Pelagianism, he devoted a large part of the present pamphlet to the defense of Socinian or Arian views. Another edition of this address was published, in 1821. In 1826, Mr. Stone commenced the publication of " The Christian Messen- ger," a small monthly. This, it is believed, was the first and only periodical published in the interest of the " Christian con- nection," as the denomination was often styled. The sect en- joyed but small prosperity in Kentucky, after its first burst of enthusiasm had subsided. It however extended rapidly over the northern states, from New England to the far west. It found a few people whose genius it suited, in every locality to which it was introduced, but never became numerous any- where.
When the doctrinal views of Barton W. Stone and those
eren
N in p ly TH no sio ter cha min
t
527
-
Cumberland Presbyterian Church.
of Alexander Campbell were brought to a comparison by means of the Christian Messenger, edited by the former, and the Christian Baptist, conducted by the latter, there were so many points of agreement, that a union between the two sects was soon proposed. To carry the proposal into effect, a great mass-meeting, composed of members of both sects, was held in Lexington, January 1, 1832, and days following. The un- ion was agreed to, by preachers and people. John Smith, Campbellite, and John Rogers, Stonite, were appointed to visit the churches of both sects, together, and endeavor to consummate the union. Their labors were successful, and the union was completed, so far as Kentucky was concerned. At the time of the union, the numbers of the two sects were sup- posed to be nearly equal, each embracing about 8,000* The rod cast down by the Presbyterians, and becoming a serpent, was sallowed up, by the rod cast down by the Baptists, nearly thirty years later, and which had also become a serpent.
THE CUMBERLAND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH.
This body, like the last one treated of, grew out of the great revival. It originated in the southwestern part of Ken- tucky, and the adjoining region of Tennessee, commonly known at that period, as the Green River and Cumberland River set- tlements. In the former of these settlements, then all embraced in Logan county, the revival begun under the ministry of James McGready, as early as 1799. By means of Sacramental meet- ings and camp-meetings, held by the Presbyterians, and freely participated in by the Methodists, the work spread very rapid- ly, and many new Presbyterian congregations were formed. The young congregations were without pastors, and there were no preachers in the country to minister to them. The confes- sion of faith, of that denomination, requires that none shall en- ter the ministry without a classical education. Men of this character, with other suitable qualifications for the Christian ministry, could not be found in the newly settled country.
Under these circumstances, David Rice, or as he was rev- erently called by his brethren, "Father Rice," advised Tran-
#Life of Elder John Smith, by J. A. Williams, p. 437.
ose
of er
It to ly-
1-
d
528
History of Kentucky Baptists.
sylvania Presbytery, within whose bounds the destitute con- gregations were located, to license men, for the present emer- gency, who were not classically educated. This advice was hesitatingly agreed to, and, in October, 1801, Finis Ewing, Samuel King, and Alexander Anderson, were licensed to cat- echise and exhort in the vacant congregations. On their re- turn from Presbytery, they immediately formed "circuits," after the manner of the Methodists, including all the vacant congregations. Without the formality of taking a text, they preached Christ to the people with much zeal and effect. The following spring, Mr. Anderson, by a majority of one, was li- cenced to preach, and, by the same majority, Ewing and King were refused license, for the time. In October, 1802, they also were licensed, but against the protest of three preachers and two elders.
At the first session of the Kentucky Synod, which convened at Lexington, in October, 1802, Cumberland Presbytery was set off from that of Transylvania, by a line running down Big Barren river to its mouth, and thence to the mouth of Salt river, and hence comprised all the Green River and Cumberland settlements west of that line. The Pres- bytery was much divided in sentiment from the beginning. It held its first meeting at Ridge Meeting-house, April 5, 1803, and comprised ten ministers. Of these, Thomas B. Craighead, Terah Templin, John Bowman, Samuel Donnel and James Balch, were opposed to the revival, and consequently to all the measures by which it was promoted, including the licensing and ordaining of uneducated men to preach. The other five, whose names were James McGready, William Hodge, William McGee, John Rankin and Samuel McAdow, favored the revival and the measures by which it was promoted. By order of the Presbytery, at this and the following session, several additional exhorters were licensed, and Messrs. Ander- son and Ewing were ordained to the ministry. Mr. King was ordained, and several other exhorters and preachers were licensed by order of Presbytery at its sessions, in April and Octo- ber, 1804.
The revival party in the Presbytery, having now an over- whelming majority, continued to supply preachers and exhort- ers, according to the demands of the work. The opposing party
int fro of cou cou
S h d CO
re
529
Nick-names.
became restless, and sent to the Synod at its session, held in October, 1804, a remonstrance signed by Craighead, Donnel and Bowman, against the proceedings of Cumberland Presby- tery. Synod appointed a committee to visit the Presbytery, and observe its proceedings. Of this committee, only Cameron attended. He was denounced as a spy.
The next meeting of the Synod was at Danville, October 15, 1805. The records of Cumberland Presbytery were laid before it, from which it appeared that the Presbytery had re- ceived Hawe, a Methodist, licensed seventeen illiterate exhorters, established circuits, recommended the people to contribute to the support of the exhorters, and committed some other irreg- ularities. The Synod was not prepared to act on the case, and yet the offenses were so grave that they could not afford to wait another year. They fell upon the expedient of appointing a commission, with full synodical powers, to meet the following December, at Gasper River meeting-house. The commission assembled according to direction. They were regarded by the revival party of the Presbytery as having no legal authority, and as being mere inquisitors. The populace was so indignant that only one man, James Read, was willing to entertain them. Each member of the commission received an opprobrious nick-name, and there was some apprehensions of a mob from the excited populace, who supposed they had come to stop the revival. The commission, however, proceeded in the discharge of its duty. It was ascertained that the Presbytery had received Mr. Hawe, a Methodist minister, without examining him in divinity and re- quiring him to subscribe to the confession of faith. Twenty- seven persons had been licensed, or ordained to preach, or ex- hort, who had adopted the confession only "as far as they deemed it agreeable to the word of God." The commission condemned these and some other proceedings. The Presbytery refused to submit to the decision, and the commission, having finished its business, dissolved.
The revival members of the Presbytery formed themselves into a council, composed of ministers, elders and representatives from vacant congregations. This council seems to have been jof the nature of a Baptist association, and to have met only for counsel and advice. Under the advisory supervision of this council, the ministers and exhorters continued to labor with
y
.
1
530
History of Kentucky Baptists.
great zeal, notwithstanding the prohibition of the commission, and the work greatly prospered.
Shortly after the organization of the council, James Mc- Gready, under whose ministry the revival had begun, and who was the chief leader and adviser of the revival party, withdrew from among them. He was a strong Calvinist, and loved the Presbyterian church. He saw a tendency in the new party to- wards Arminianism, and a strong probability that the party would be severed from the mother church. His defection was a great loss to the council. He moved to Henderson and was fully restored to the Presbyterian church.
At the meeting of the Synod, in October, 1806, Cum- berland Presbytery was dissolved, and its members added to Transylvania. The council now became the medium of communication with the Synod, and the General Assembly. Various attempts were made to reconcile the existing differ- ences between the council and Synod, till both sides despaired of success. All the original leaders of the revival party, except McAdow, had either abandoned the council, or died. Those who remained in charge of the affairs of the excluded revival party, felt the need of providing for themselves and the people they had been instrumental in leading in the way of salvation. Accordingly, on the 4th day of February, 1810, Samuel King, Finis Ewing and Samuel McAdow, met at the house of the last named, in Dixon county, Tennessee, and organized Cum- berland Presbytery, independent of the Presbyterian church. The first act of the new Presbytery was to ordain Ephraim Mc- Lean.
Thus did the Cumberland Presbyterian church come into existence, and take its position among what is termed ortho- dox denominations of Christians. At its first regular meeting which was held at Ridge meeting-house, March, 1810, it includ- ed four ordained ministers, viz : Samuel McAdow, Finis Ewing, Samuel King and Ephraim McLean; six licensed preachers, viz .: James B. Potter, Hugh Kirkpatrick, Robert Bell, David Foster, Thomas Calhoun, and James Farr, and seven candidates for the ministry. The number of congregations and members are un- known. Another attempt was made to secure a union with the Presbyterian church, but it signally failed, and the Cumberland Presbyterians were debarred from the communion tables of their
I W P G un th I, ch 300 for ber
531
Presbyterian Trouble.
former brethren. Feeling now that they must act independently, they entered the field with renewed zeal and energy. Their labors continued to be abundantly successful. In 1813, Cum- berland Presbytery was divided into three, called Logan, Nash- ville and Elk Presbyteries.
The members of these Presbyteries met at Beech church, Sumner county, Tennessee, October 5, 1813, and constituted Cumberland Synod. They now set forth a brief view of their doctrine and discipline, which was published in Woodward's edition of Buck's Theological Dictionary. The denomination had a rapid growth from its beginning. In 1820, it was not only numerous in Tennessee and western Kentucky, but had many flourishing societies in Alabama, Indiana, Illinois, Mis- souri, and Arkansas. In 1822, they had 46 ordained ministers, who reported 2,718 conversions and 575 adults baptized. In 1826, there were 80 ordained ministers, who reported 3, 305 conversions, and 768 adults baptized.
In 1826, the Synod resolved to erect a Manual Labor Col- lege. Princeton, Kentucky, was selected as a location, and so rapidly was the plan executed, that the school went into opera- tion the following March. Under the style of CUMBERLAND PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE, it was chartered by the Kentucky Leg- islature, the same year. This was a valuable and flourishing institution oflearning, during many years; but it finally began to wither, and became extinct several years past.
In 1827, the number of ordained ministers in the Cumber- land Presbyterian church was 114, the number of professions that year, was 4,006, and the number of adults baptized, 996. The General Assembly of the Cumberland Presbyterian church was instituted of four Synods, and held its first session in Princeton, Kentucky, in May, 1829. From the minutes of the General Assembly of 1833, it appears that the Assembly had under its care six Synods and thirty-two Presbyteries. During the previous year, 5,937 persons had professed conversion, and r, le n- he 1, 150 adults had been baptized. The numerical strength of the church, in 1834, was put down at 9 Synods, 35 Presbyteries, 300 ordained ministers, 100 licensed preachers, 75 candidates for the ministry, 10,688 professions during the year. The num- nd ber of communicants was estimated at 50,000. · ,
This schism, rent from the Presbyterian church by measures
-
eir
532
History of Kentucky Baptists.
growing out of the Great Revival, soon grew to such dimen- sions as to rival the Mother church in the field of its operations. It was far more stable and consis'ent in its course, in proportion as it was nearer scriptural in its doctrine, than was the " Christian church." Its doctrine was, and still is, a compromise between those of the Methodists and Presbyterians. It has nothing pe- culiar to itself. It is manifestly a Hybrid, partaking of some of the best qualities of its diverse parents. It had a vigorous, healthy growth, and continues to be a respectable religious de- nomination. It has manifested much zeal, energy and perse- verance, and has, doubtless, accomplished much good. But it has already begun to manifest the tendency of the universal law of hybrids, to return to the original stock. Its members have al- ready begun to return to the parent churches, and it is probable that, within a few more generations, the CUMBERLAND PRESBY- TERIAN CHURCH will cease to exist.
THE MILLENNIAL CHURCH [SHAKERS.]
The implantation of this society of harmless, dreamy en- usiasts, on the soil of Kentucky, and in the Mississippi Valley, generally, was a result of the Great Revival, and like the "Christian church " and "Cumberland Presbyterian church," was an ultimate outgrowth of the Presbyterian church. But little need be said about it. It has done no good, and comparatively but little harm, religiously. It was, especially during its early and medieval history in the west, of no small advantage to the agricultural, horticultural and mechanical interest of those neigh- borhoods in which its societies were located. The Shakers, wild and vague in their religious notions, but wise and practi- cal in their management of their material resources, were the fore-runners in the improvement of live stock, agricultural and mechanical implements, and the methods of farming and gar- dening. On this account, if for no other reason, they deserve'a brief notice.
This sect originated in England, early in the 17th century. Their most distinguished leader was a poor, illiterate woman of the name of Ann Lee, who, after being separated from her husband, to whom she had borne four children, and while in prison for having profaned the Sabbath, pretended to have re-
0
C. L in fr m in to
ext Re this po ma In day
533
The Millenial Church.
ceived most wonderful revelations. She succeeded in convinc- ing the small religious community of which she was a member, that in her person was fulfilled the promise of the second com- ing of Christ : that as Christ had come the first time in the male body of Jesus; so now he had appeared, the second time, in the female body of herself. This extraordinary event occurred in the year 1770, in the 25th year of her age. After being imprisoned several times in England, she came to New York, in 1774. In that State she lived ten years, during which time a number of Shaker " families " were gathered in different parts of New England and New York. She died in 1784, having been im- prisoned on a charge of being a spy, in 1780.
The largest and most influential body of Shakers in the United States, at the time of which we write, was that of New Lebanon, New York. This community is dignified by the name " the church," while all other communities in the country, are only appendages to it, and are called " families." Under ordinary circumstances, they made few proselytes. For keep- ing up their communities, they are dependent on two sources. As their religion does not allow marriage, they have no child- ren of their own, but, especially in time of fatal epidemics, when many poor children are left without parents, they send out their agents and gather up the little orphans, which they bring up in their faith. In time of extraordinary religious ex- citement, they send missionaries to the scene of enthusiasm, and make proselytes of the most enthusiastic. Their church at New Lebanon was built up by "' Mother Ann Lee " and her family, in time of great religious excitement, in 1780, and was the first fruits of their labors in America. In a small volume, titled "A Sum- mary View of the Millennial Church," etc., printed at Albany, in 1848, we find an account of the first visit of their missionaries to the Mississippi Valley. It is, in substance, as follows :
About the beginning of the nineteenth century, a most extraordinary revival of religion, commonly called The Kentucky Revival, commenced in the western states. The subjects of this wonderful work, besides the marvelous operations of the power of God upon their bodies, were greatly exercised in re- markable dreams, visions, revelations and the spirit of prophecy. In these gifts of the Spirit they saw and testified that the great day of God was at hand ; that Christ was about to set up his
ry. of 1er ein re-
ti- he nd ar-
e S e y y
h- S,
534
History of Kentucky Baptists.
kingdom on earth, and that this very work would terminate in the full manifestation of the latter day of glory. The believers in the eastern states received repeated intelligence of this work from the public papers, and well remembering the prophecy of Mother Ann, concerning the opening of the gospel in the western country, they began to look for its speedy fulfillment. Accordingly, near the close of the year 1804, the church at New Lebanon was impressed with a feeling to send out messengers to visit the subjects of the revival. John Meacham, Benjamin S. Youngs and Issachar Bates were selected for this important mission. They set out on the first day of January, 1804, on a pedestrial journey of more than a thousand miles. They ar- rived in Kentucky about the first of March .*
The proceedings of these missionaries have already been narrated. Several communities were formed in Ohio and In- diana, and two in Kentucky. Among the leading converts to Shakerism were " Malcom Worley, a man of respectable char- acter, handsome fortune, and liberal education, and who had been a leader in the revival,"t John Dunlavy, David Purviance, Matthew Houston and Richard McNemar. Worley had been set apart to the ministry by the Newlights. The other four had been Presbyterian preachers. McNemar was a "minister of great celebrity." The community formed in Mercer county, Kentucky, was called Pleasant Hill, and, in 1823, numbered near 500 persons. Another "family" was collected at South Union (Gasper Springs) in Logan county, of the same State, which contained about 400 members. Among the early con- verts to the Shakers, was John Rankin, who had been a Pres- byterian minister, and an enthusiastic leader in the revival. These "families" have probably remained nearly stationary, for the last half century." They are a frugal, industrious peo- ple, and have acquired considerable wealth. Their religious tenets are too silly and absurd to be worth studying.
*Millennial Church, pp. 78, 79.
İIb. p. 79,
u G B
SC
am
WE
-
CHAPTER XXIX.
THE GREAT REVIVAL AMONG THE BAPTISTS.
When Rev. Robert Davidson, D. D., in his history of the Presbyterian church in Kentucky, says: "Unlike the still small voice, or the softly flowing waters of Siloa, the great re- vival of 1800, rather resembled the whirlwind, the earthquake, the impetuous torrent, whose track was marked by violence and desolation," the description must be applied to its influence on the Pedo-Baptists, and not to that on the Baptists. The stormy violence was caused, not by preaching the gospel of the son of God, in a rustic log meeting-house, or a settler's cabin, singing praise to God with becoming gravity, tearfully exhort- ing sinners to repent, and meekly instructing the penitent in the way of salvation, "from house to house," with earnest humble prayer, but by thundering declamation from "the stand " at great sacramental gatherings and camp-meetings, shrieking rude choruses in the ears of the multitudes, yelling frantic exhortations "up and down the aisles " and shouting boisterous prayers from stentorian lungs. It was not the Holy Spirit, moving the hearts of the people to humility and re- pentance before God, that moved the multitudes to madness, but the stirring of human passions by wild acclamations and ' loud confused shouting.
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.