USA > Massachusetts > Essex County > Ipswich > Memento mori : part the first being an accurate transcription of the tomb-stones, monuments, foot-stones, and other memorials in the Ancient Old Burial Yard in the Town of Ipswich, County of Essex, Massachusetts, from its beginnings in 1634 to the present day > Part 1
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org.
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14
Gc 974.402 Ip6j no.29 1254253
R.L.
GENEALOGY COLLECTION
GEN
ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3 1833 00085 1607
GENEALOGY 974.402 IP6I NO.29
MEMENTO MORI
PART THE FIRST
Being
An Accurate Transcription of the Tomb-Stones, Monu- ments, Foot-Stones, and Other Memorials in the Ancient Old North Burial Yard in the Town of Ipswich, County of Essex, Massachusetts, From its Beginnings in the Year Anno. Domi. 1634 to the Present Day, With a Chart of the Location of the Same that any Grave Therein May be Located with Ease and Accuracy, Together with a History and Description of this Ancient Burial Yard,
By Arthur Warren Johnson Esqr. And Ralph Elbridge Ladd Jr. Esqr.
Both of Ipswich, Massachusetts; & Published by the
Ipswich Historical Society as Number XXIX of their Publications.
Annº. Domi. MDCCCCXXXV.
1254253
To the Memory of the Rev. Thomas Franklin Waters M.A., Founder of the Ipswich Historical Society and Historian of Ipswich, this study is dedicated in the knowledge that had he lived it would have borne his name.
1
OLD NORTH CHURCHYARD
INTRODUCTION.
It is hoped that this present study is but the first of a series which will, when completed, comprise a complete transcription, with the necessary charts, of all the ancient and modern burial places in greater Ipswich. All the ma- terial has been collected and is in manuscript form await- ing publication. It includes, beyond the material presented here (the Old North, or High Street Burial Yard of Ips- wich), its continuation, the Highland Cemetery, the South Cemetery, the Locust Grove, and the three cemeteries of the Linebrook Parish of Ipswich. It also includes the burial yard of the second or Chebacco Parish of Ipswich, now Essex, and a portion of that of the Hamlet Parish, now Hamilton, in use when these towns were parts of Ipswich, and the private cemetery of the Nourse family in Ipswich Village.
A few fundamental facts should be kept in mind with reference to these studies. Neither the original owners of the ancient burying grounds, the Parish Churches, under whose care and jurisdiction they grew up, nor the towns to which they were later conveyed, kept or at any times possessed charts or other records of the location of graves. It is obvious that until recent times the ownership of indi- vidual graves and plots and the lines of demarcation were very vague. Again it was not until comparatively recent times that statute law required those in charge of the dead to file with town officials the time and place of burials. For this reason town records of deaths are quite incomplete.
In doing this work we are deeply conscious that we are but completing that which a long line of antiquarians had begun, but which, through a series of varying circum- stances, was never brought to completion.
2
OLD NORTH CHURCHYARD
The first to start this work was the late Abraham Hammatt (1781 - 1845). Primarily a genealogist, his work was in the eighteenth century and it is known that he copied many of the Ipswich stones of that period as aids to his studies. Unfortunately much of his work is lost.
Next in time was the work of the late Augustin Cald- well and Arthur W. Dow, who, in their Ipswich Antiqua- rian Papers, copied and published many of the outstanding Old North inscriptions. We have been through this publi- cation, checking all which they included and have found some which have since disappeared from the cemetery. Such stones are indicated in the text. None of the above scholars made any pretence at a complete study.
The late John Nourse entered the field somewhat later and began a detailed scale chart. It is evident from his papers that he spent a large amount of time and did much hard and thorough work but unfortunately he did not cover more than a part of the Old North Yard. His approach was both admirable and enviable, making a scale fac-simile copy of each stone. We would have liked to continue his admirable example but the difficulty and expense of print- ing made it impossible. His papers were turned over to the custody of the Town Clerk. Through the courtesy of Mr. Edward Cogswell, the present incumbent, we were given access to them.
The last worker in the field was the late Rev. T. Frank- lin Waters, who, with the assistance of Mr. Henry Spauld- ing, started the work anew. He contemplated publishing his results in the series of the Ipswich Historical Society. With his scholarly mind he approached the diffi- culties of the problem in a thorough manner. It was his intention to divide the Old North Yard into areas delimited permanently by granite markers, for the purpose of chart- ing the stones. A few of these were placed. The prelim- inary work was completed and many inscriptions were copied, but unfortunately his untimely death brought his wide-spread antiquarian research to an end. Through the
3
OLD NORTH CHURCHYARD
kindness of Mrs. Waters we obtained the use of his papers.
After we surveyed the material in hand, it was our intention to make a compilation of all the work previously done, thus bringing to completion the attempts of our predecessors. We did this, copying the material on indi- vidual cards for purposes of alphabetical arrangement. This done, we went to the Old North Yard only to discover that the work previously done covered for the most part identical sections with important areas untouched. When we considered the charts prepared by Mr. Nourse and Mr. Waters we found in the first instance that the individual inscriptions were not keyed to his chart, in the latter that it had been started on the basis of granite markers which had not been placed. Faced with these obvious difficulties it seemed wise to start the work afresh. This also necessi- tated the making of a new chart. When all the stones had been card-indexed we checked them against the work of our predecessors, thus discovering those stones which had disappeared since their various work.
It became obvious to us very soon that the number of burials on the basis of calculated population was far in excess of the number of graves which had been marked with stones. Any scholarly approach to such a problem is difficult. One might postulate the burial of any number of persons by probability but such a procedure would at best be filled with inaccuracies. The obvious solution was to discover some source of information as to burials which had not been marked with stones. Town records did not supply this information, neither did parish records. We examined both. The only other possibility was records of undertakers. We discovered that the office and profession of undertaker was comparatively recent. In the eighteenth and seventeenth centuries certain of the parish officers performed this function and no records could be discovered except in the case of the Linebrook cemeteries.
Coming to the period of the professional undertaker we were very fortunate to discover that Mr. Ralph K.
4
OLD NORTH CHURCHYARD
Whittier had the private records of the late Mr. Philip Clark and his father. He very kindly turned over this col- lection for our use and study. In them we found evidence of many burials in the various cemeteries and in a few cases approximate location of the same. These will be found in the text marked with an asterisk.
Some may ask the value of such a work as this. The answer to this question lies primarily in the growing inter- est in genealogical studies. In such work one of the most important primary sources of data is cemetery inscriptions. Beyond this is the sentimental value attached to the knowl- edge that when time and the weather have destroyed many of the stones, there will still exist a record of those places where the dust of the generations has found abiding rest and of the names of those who have contributed to the heritage which is ours. And last there is the conviction, because every worker in the field of Ipswich history has felt this a task worthy the effort, that were they here, they would be pleased in the knowledge that another generation of workers in their chosen field had brought the work to conclusion and thus realized for them those dreams which the accidents of time made impossible of fruition.
One practical value has already accrued from this work. During the summer of 1934, as a project to supply work for the horde of local unemployed, an ambitious project was started to "restore" the Old North Burial Yard. The work was begun and some three hundred an- cient stones were uprooted from the dust which they marked and hallowed, sorted according to size, and replaced in straight rows, orderly to be sure, neat without a doubt, but quite at odds with all historical and sentimental prece- dent.
When we learned of this project, eminently worthy in its intent though disastrous in its results, we, with the officers of the Ipswich Historical Society, the Society for the Preservation of New England Antiquities, the Society for the Preservation of the Beauties of Essex County, the
5
OLD NORTH CHURCHYARD
local chapter of the Daughters of the American Revolution, and many historically minded citizens, protested against this unusual procedure. The result was that the stones were replaced on the graves where they had been first erected. In this work the local administrators of the proj- ect gave the most whole hearted co-operation, received sug- gestions in the most kindly spirit, and on the whole, despite the unfortunate beginnings, the work was reorganized, the stones handled under our supervision, weak ones re- paired, cement foundations placed under those where it was deemed necessary and prudent, several ancient tombs in danger of collapse rebuilt and permanently sealed, a task which, in the ordinary course of town expenditures, could never have been provided for by funds received from ordinary taxation.
Had it not been that we had completed our preliminary work, viz, charting and copying every stone, the project would have resulted in disaster for it would have been im- possible to replace the stones on the graves to which, in the course of nature, they belonged.
In the practical use of this study may be pointed out certain principles we have used in its construction. First, in copying the inscriptions from the stones it was our original intention to publish fac-simile reproductions. This was impossible and consequently we have followed this procedure. Every name, date, and memorial verse or in- scription has been transcribed with the original spelling, punctuation, and variants of stone cutting with these three exceptions-the ancient form of s (f) has been eliminated, also the ancient use of Y as an equivalent of th, and the various forms of the and sign. It will be noted that we have not followed, in many instances, the line arrangement as found on the stones. We have done this to facilitate the printing and the reading.
In some instances in cross-indexing, where we could not be sure whether names were maiden or middle, we have assumed, where reason and dates indicated, that they were
6
OLD NORTH CHURCHYARD
the former. In doing this our intention was to be inclusive at the risk of an occasional error.
In preparing the charts we had hoped to have them drawn to scale but practical considerations made it impos- sible. We had to choose between this, which would have resulted in a series of large awkward maps, or free-hand diagrams far more convenient for use. We chose the latter method. It will be noted that first there is a key map, giving sections into which the cemetery is divided, and that this is followed by a series of sectional diagrams in which each stone can be located.
Some may question the inclusion of the terraces as part of the ancient yard. In that they were part of the area transferred to the town by the Parish in 1859, and in that the Highland Cemetery does not begin until the brow of the hill is reached, the terraces constitute an integral part of the Old North Burial Yard. Therefore they have been included in this part of the work.
In passing we point out that at one time these terraces had names, for each of the various presidents of the United States (always omitting the Democratic presidents-pre- sumably no affront to the dead was desired, by making them restless in a nomenclature of which they did not approve in life). Because this system has passed out of use, we thought it wise to ignore the once prevalent custom and list them within the neutrality of numbers.
One other thing should be mentioned. In each case where a grave has been marked as containing a Revolu- tionary or Civil War soldier, we have indicated it so that if the stones should disappear or disintegrate, the resting places may still be kept in knowledge and our patriotic societies may continue their splendid work of honouring them.
It has been our intention to present this study as free from errors as possible, but we feel perfection not possible. If any be noticed, which we hope will not be the case, we
7
OLD NORTH CHURCHYARD
shall be happy to acknowledge them, and avoid their recur- rence in the continuation of this work.
It would seem appropriate in such a work as this to include a history of the cemetery itself from the time it formed the limit of the town in 1634 to the present day. We must sincerely apologize for the omission of such a history. We attempted, by research in the Registry of Deeds of Essex County, to extend the deed history of the area given by Mr. Waters in his history of Ipswich but gave up in despair after having reached the conclusion that every pertinent known fact had been included by Mr. Waters and to extend it would necessitate the employment of a trained surveyor to attack the problem through all the deeds of those whose land has ever abutted the cemetery in its various stages of growth.
Men of a century and more ago apparently did not realize that their descendants would be at all interested in the half acre or the "quarter and halfe quarter of acre of land" they transferred so blithely with no mention as to where these fractions of land might be located.
May we point out to those interested that our fellow- townsman, Mr. Edward Darling, has been working on the problem for several years, and while he kindly offered to us the use of his results to the present, we felt in justice to him that his work should be carried to completion by him. Until then we suggest that anyone interested in the history of the land of the cemetery itself consult Mr. Waters' Ipswich in the Massachusetts Bay Colony.
Key Chart
to Old North Graveyard
H
G
1
Steps
First
. errace
first terrett
F
Path
Marker
B
" Granite marker
col. Isaac Dodge Tomb
1
1
E
Marker
Marker
1
1
A
Tool Dhouse
Marker
Gate
Sidewalk
side walk
D
Path
Terrace
156 152
12
Baker 52 Tomb
Steps
212
20+
159
150
117
116
8
202 201 200
161
115
113
86
112
85
15
17
51
122
50
14
123
84
148 124
110
&3
13
147 125
109
146 126
164
.145 127
1
ith
166
19
$5
56
10
212
58
43
23
12+
79
42
..
41
167
189
100 78
27
130
E
9
132
75
38
30
8
170
63#
74
37
31
171
73
62
36
33
7
3
172
140
102
6+
34
65
6
177
175
137
104
68
35
69
Path
70
71
21 22
88 87968584
37 .19
19
25
24 18
48
26
85
47
45 44
17
15
74
66
14.
13
43
12
42
33
67
E'
56
50
51
41
59 54
3
72 71
68
2 r
Sidewalk
Diagram
of Sections A. and B.
Left edge of cemetery
142
135
141
63
2
173
139
103
ITY
138
107
66
67
176
23
20
Both
+9
63
28
16
75
65
+6
A
19
34
Ji
81
55
11
36
40
37
5
38 39
4
72
180 MINS
14 143 169
133
101
76
39
29
6 0
40
דר
131
10
165
$1
B
21
59
11
195
15
160
55
105
92
79
17
32
$9
Has kell Tomb
Lord monument
1
Brown Worcester
With
149
Tree
148
75
1
73
174
เร2 173
118
146 153 H6
56
117
235
1
6.7 71
79
68
70
80 81
144
205,
th
52
157
143
Tree
141
159 160
se
31 32
5¥
60
115
55
61
170
119
176
#9 65
136
163
34
1
82
32
10
25
106
124
47
83
132
46
105
131
180 224
130
84
129
66
23 22
44
67
103
Fat 166 181 165
182
223
35
2436
126
39
merker
161
184
161
130
160
156
---
12 39
40
41
20
19
72
98
133 134 158 188
320
24,20
42
18
43
56
88 89
118
16
74
76
לעי
157
138
156
182
17 16
55
40
193
54 53
91
1955 216
196
204
52
92
93
1861 185 1841
83 91 143 148
212 211
1
94 45 96
113
90
?
89
147
6
209
200
110
180
208
9
47
97
46
179
12
144
203
+
100
106
178
84
205
10%
105.
206
לכל
2
44
1.3 104
177
I marker
---
side walk
Diagram of
Sections
C. and D.
House at front
cemetery
108
85
204
101
3
7
45
48
115 114
44
210
112
48
182 181
146
5
$7
145
امعـ
1
86
202
16
tree
-
12 11 10
78 94 14 ? 80 8: 43 82 92
1.12 152
215
12 13 H
187
150151
2131
10
50 59
120
73
97
135
219
-
136
190
191
15 it
78
13
177
46 95
:31 132
159 187 221
40
122
174
192
21 41
121
195 194 ,93
E.
38 34
$5
38
86
123
172
wker
167 188a 188
tree 35
45 65
104. 125
168
128
169
127
Tree
170 197 1961 171
36 37
43
68 10% 69 101
43
550 229 2.28
26
29 6364
135
63 109 113
121
1
177 227
61
49
168
226.1
Tree
123
48
C.
166 201 200 $ 199
178 167 179225
33
34
1
66
161
27
28
33 50
162 164 tren
30 62 31
134
64 108 112 2 107 111
165 203
market tree.
Section F .
147
76 78
72
17
154 155 156
· Trea
23# 2571
175
29
$3 57 54
231
30
116
Tree
1 1.7
140 1.39
D.
137
62 110 114- 120
231
67
1
158
150 150 152
right etc.
[ Manning tomb
Bate'
Section A.
4 3
109
1 94
197 198
116
175
Section
176
155
$3 221
128 129
124125
42 70 100
7199
133
74
Haskell Tomb
Treadwell Tomat
232
150
20%
45
144
205
153
44
59
5.8
19
60
57
61
42
98
144
91
94
200
155
198
62
40
100
156
101
212
3.5
63
102
15%
196
159
195193
103
142 160
144 192
141
161
1
65
140
240
241
242
245
- 17
165
230
187
68
134
167
229
133
104
168
185
248
47
1
22
64
105
171
182
23
181
26
70
105
131
172
213
250
27
197
130
180
215
251
12
228
253
88
44
72.
73
87
127
74
86
110
126
1
75
85
175
176
84
דלו
217
11
12.5
179
218
226
112 124
219
178
113
220
16
31
7€
114
123
32
4-3
115
122
79
3.3
225
T
34
224
8 1
1
35
1
36
37
38
Tool
39
+2
93
house
40
Diagram of Section E.
· Right edge of Cemetery
225
117
120
118
·
92
119
5 3 . 2
Path.
234
202
206
1.7
154
207
235236
146
145
201
208
her
237
1
56
211
198
157
197
54
118
54
53
--
52
138
164
137
189
51
188
136
67
231
135
166
186
48
21
247
184
1169
249
14 24
-
25
214
28
252
46
109
וד
45
229
174
124
254
255
256
173
108
129
20
50
49
115 .
132
183
quid ripon
66
163 1623
110
13
97
96
14.8
151 1.52
Prescott monument
Neyest Tomb
203
233
259
210
84
4
8
30
76
ז׳ר
221
1
122
116 . 121
80
.
Legion Cemetery
214
219
222 221
223
220
211
140 191 192 143 184 195
196
[851
186 187 188 189
184
182 183
179180
172 173
161
163 164
166
167
٠٦٥
160 162
165
159
138
153 154 155 156 159
135 136 137
132
134
13.0
131
125
126 127
128 129 130
121 122
143
112
103
120
124
89 9091
949596 197
97 99
100
101
103
105 106 107 104
108
(109)
6364
66
68
72
73 74
75
7879
81 82
84 85
85
5
67
69)
43
44 45
48 49
50 91 52
5354
53
56 57
$9
42
46
47
58
Sob!
14 15 16 17 1819
21 21 22 23
272525 27 28
$1
38
39
1331 154] |351
1 30
20
26
25
9
-
Path
Right edge of Cemetery
Section H.
3536
32 33 34
30
11 12 13
789
12345
6
13 12 "
F.
21 222327
27
29
$6
14 156
[19]
Diagram
of Sections F. and G.
1
1224
209 210-12
203 -20%
2 .2
210 201
199
171
169
178
181
148149
147
14.0 141 142 143 144 145 146
133
110 .15
117
118
116
88
92
93
G.
Ino
7% ??
83
70
.!: Steps!
31
---
-
1
-
[218]
217216215
213
148
107208 205 206
ללו 176 ללי
151 152
29
Highland Cemetery
96
90 89 88 87 96 $5
95 9+
Path
13920180 778 7 75
73
72 71
65
7 th Tert.
84
67
70
6059
5756
51
53
64
Terr.
464443
00 49
48
2+9
Ferr.
1111
14th
3%
Terr.
3rd Tort
1111
2nd 26 25
Terr
13 12 11 :09
87
3 21
6
1st Perr.
Till Steps IIV
of cemetery
Section B.
Baker Tomb
Diagram of Section H.
Steps \\\
30
88.736 38
33 32 4
28 28
27
2523 28 21 20 19
17
111
63 62
14
OLD NORTH CHURCHYARD
ABBREVIATIONS
It will be noticed that each inscription in this book is preceded by a letter and a number. The letter refers to the section of the cemetery in which is located the inscription, and the number to the particular stone. To find a stone by means of this key, it is necessary to use the diagrams pub- lished in this book.
(F.S.)-foot stone. (M.M.)-maker's mark.
*- Information from the record books of Mr. Philip Clark, undertaker. T.F.W .- Thomas Franklin Waters.
A.H .- Abraham Hammatt.
A.C .- Augustin Caldwell.
A.W.D .- Arthur Wesley Dow.
G.A.R .- Grand Army of the Republic.
S.A.R .- Sons of American Revolution.
V.S .- Vital Statistics.
Ips. Ant. Pap .- Ipswich Antiquarian Papers, published by Augustin Caldwell and Arthur W. Dow.
OLD NORTH CHURCHYARD
D-107-Here lies the bodyes of John and James Abbe, sons of Mr. Joseph and Mrs. Tamzon Abbe. John died July the 12th, 1736, in the 8th year of his age. James died August the 30, 1736, in the 2d year of his age.
(F.S.) Johmn and James Abbe.
D-102-Here lies Joseph Abbe, the son of Mr. Joseph and Mrs. Tamezon Abbe, who died the 25th of August, -aged 3-and 19 -. (stone defaced.)
15
OLD NORTH CHURCHYARD
D-101-Hear lies Sarah Abbey, the dafter of Mr. Joseph and Tamiza Abbey, who died January the 5th, 1723, aged 6 weeks.
(F.S.) Sarah Abbey.
D-99 -Here lies Sarah Abbe, the dafter of Mr. Joseph and Mrs. Tamezon Abbe, who died November the 18, 1726, Aged 2 years, 4 month, and 23 days.
G-88 -Annette Adams-see John G. Caldwell.
G-139-(front) John Peabody Adams, Sept. 10, 1847- Feb. 23, 1916.
His wife, Helen Todd, Dec. 29, 1849-Nov. 22, 1933.
Jennie Helen, July 6, 1879-Aug. 17, 1918.
(left) George W. Adams, died Nov. 22, 1854, aged 5 years.
(F.S.) FATHER MOTHER JENNIE.
E-156-Mary Holt Adams-see Mary Holt Lord.
G-179 Mary Adams-see Woodbridge Adams.
G-178-Sarah Adams-see Woodbridge Adams.
C-27 -(stone effaced) Her-the-on-mber the 2, 1- aged 26 ye -. (F.S.) Simon Adams.
N.B. Simon Adams, son of Simon and Hannah, born Oct. 20, 1694, died of smallpox, Dec. 24, 1721, (V.S.)
G-178-Woodbridge Adams, 1819-1849. His wife, Mary Peabody, 1817-1908. Their daughter, Sarah Adams, 1842-1911.
16
OLD NORTH CHURCHYARD
D-126-Mr. Nathaniel Addams died April the 11, 1715, in the 74 year of his age.
Now hes gon to eter ==
Nall rest=
God wil him safly keep=
All though hes buried
In the dust=
In Jesus he doth sleep,
O you his children
That are left=
I pray. Let some be found
That do endeavour
To make good=
Your foregon, leaders=
Ground-
Grave saint behind
That cannot find
Thy, old, love night, nor
Morn := Pray look a
Bove, for thers your love
Singing with the
First born.
D-65 -(Front) FATHER MOTHER
(Back) Daniel J. Akerman, Born May 11, 1799, Died Nov. 29, 1868.
Lucy L. Akerman, Born Mar. 8, 1804, Died Mar. 10, 1882.
H-15 -Edwin F. Akerman, May 25, 1849-Nov. 12, 1926. His Wife, Isabella Patterson, Mar. 22, 1851- Oct. 14, 1910.
G-53 -Jonathan Akerman died Apr. 25, 1855, AE. 39 y'rs.
My hope is in Christ. (F.S.) J.A.
D-65 -Lucy L. Akerman-see Daniel J. Akerman. B-153-Abby Fisher, wife of Theodore Andrews, born Feb. 22, 1808, died Oct. 6, 1886.
17
OLD NORTH CHURCHYARD
B-156-Asa Andrews, born May 11, 1762, graduated at Harvard College 1783, died Jan. 13, 1856, in his 94th year. (F.S.) A.A.
B-152-Charlotte Andrews, born Aug. 8, 1804, died Mar. 26, 1888.
B-6 -David Andrews, died July 6, 1871, Aged 81. His wife, Mehitable Pearson, died April 4, 1872, Aged 79. Asleep in Jesus! blessed sleep ! From which none ever wake to weep. (F.S.) D.A. M.P.A.
B-32 -In memory of Mis Elisabeth Andrews, relict of Mr. David Andrews, who died July 31, 1808, AEt. 68.
Fairwell my friends a short fairwell Till we shall meet again above, In the sweet groves where pleasures dwell And treees of life bear fruits of love.
B-33 -Erected to the memory of Mrs. Lucy Andrews, wife of Mr. David Andrews, who departed this life March 19th, 1767, in the 40th year of her age.
She was a tender wife a kind Mother and an exem- plary and joyful Christian.
Happy the dead who die in Christ, They from their sins and labors rest; They from their sins & labors rest; To the bright mansions of the just.
(F.S.) Mrs. Lucy Andrews.
B-34 -Lydia M. Andrews-see William F. Andrews. B-34 -Mary W. Andrews-see William F. Andrews.
B-6 -Mehitable P. Andrews-see David Andrews. *- Sadie B. Andrews died Feb. 24, 1888, aged 20 years, 6 days.
She was the daughter of Thomas and Lucy Ann Jewett.
18
OLD NORTH CHURCHYARD
B-155-Sacred to the memory of Mrs. Sarah S., wife of Theodore Andrews, who died Dec. 21, A.D. 1844, aged 42.
B-154-Theodore Andrews, born Aug. 20, 1801, Died Feb. 26, 1883.
B-157-Theodore Henry, eldest son of Theodore and Sarah S. Andrews, died Jan. 2, 1853, aged 20 years and 8 months.
B-34 -William F. Andrews, Died Aug. 27, 1840, Aged 26. Lydia M. Andrews, Died June 19, 1842, Aged 25. Mary W. Andrews, Died Feb. 1, 1828, Aged 11 months.
Children of David and Mehitable Andrews. (F.S.) W.F.A. L.M.A. M.W.A.
H-76 -Lydia Annable-see David Francis Dow.
H-76 -Mary P. Annable-see David Francis Dow.
C-188-Here lies the body of Mr. Benjaman Appleton, who deceased Febr. 12th, 1731, in the 30th year of his age.
(F.S.) Mr. Benjaman Appleton.
C-218-Elizabeth Appleton deseased June the 13th, 1703, in the 16 year of her age.
(F.S.) E.A.
C-220-In memory of Mrs. Elizabeth Apleton, the virtu- ous and pious Consort of Mr. Isaac Apleton, who departed this life April 29th, 1785, Aged 75.
"Blessed are the Dead that die in the Lord" She left 8 sons and 2 daughters, and 40 Grand- children.
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.