USA > Massachusetts > Bristol County > A History of Bristol County, Massachusetts, vol 1 > Part 10
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45 | Part 46 | Part 47 | Part 48 | Part 49 | Part 50 | Part 51 | Part 52 | Part 53 | Part 54 | Part 55 | Part 56 | Part 57 | Part 58 | Part 59 | Part 60 | Part 61 | Part 62 | Part 63 | Part 64 | Part 65 | Part 66 | Part 67 | Part 68 | Part 69
It was the Hon. Francis Baylies, Old Colony historian, who. first ap- plied the quotation from Virgil, "Dux foemina facti," to Elizabeth Poole, and the incident of her settling here. And it was James Edward Seaver, historian and genealogist, who stated a well-founded belief of his that, according to the Old Colony records of December 4, 1638, William Poole, Mr. John Gilbert, Mr. Henry Andrews, John Strong, John Deane, Walter Deane and Edward Case were nearly contemporaneous settlers, Taunton not then being named as a township.
The Littleworth farm locality retains that name today. The Shute farm, to the southeast of that, was confiscated by the government in 1781, John Borland, owner, grand-nephew of Elizabeth Poole, being a Loyalist. Elizabeth Poole was an energetic and enterprising woman, one of the founders of the first religious congregation in Taunton, and a member of the ironworks corporation. Eventually she removed to her home lot on the south side of the present Main street, in Taunton, and there she died, May 21, 1684, in the sixty-sixth year of her age. She is buried at the Plain cemetery, but Taunton women have erected a monument to her memory at Mount Pleasant cemetery. The phrase, "Dux foemina facti," referred to, was adopted for the present motto of the city seal, January 1, 1865, as advocated by Rev. Mortimer Blake.
Elizabeth Poole "led the way." Then came the Forty-six Purchasers, and the building of a permanent town. By a confirmatory deed of the First Purchase from Philip, son of Massasoit, wherein it is set down that the year 1638 was that in which the plantation was bought of Massasoit, the following-named, from most of whom hundreds of families throughout the United States claim descent, were the associated Purchasers, each name filling a unique place in these first annals: Henry Andrews, John Briant, Mr. John Browne, Richard Burt, Edward Case, Thomas Cooke, David Corwithy, William Coy, John Greenman, John Deane, Walter Deane, Fran-
68
BRISTOL COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS
cis Doughtye, John Drake, William Dunn, Mr. Thomas Farwell, Mr. John Gilbert, Thomas Gilbert, John Gilbert, John Gingell, William Hailstone, George Hall, William Harvey, Hezekiah Hoar, Robert Hobell, William Holloway, John Kingsley, John Luther, George Macey, William Parker, John Parker, Richard Paull, William Phillips, Mr. William Poole, the Widow Randall, John Richmond, Hugh Rossiter, William Scadding, An- thony Slocum, Richard Smith, John Smith, Francis Street, Henry Uxley, Richard Williams, Benjamin Wilson, Joseph Wilson. Each of these people, with the exception of Mr. John Browne, was owner of six to twelve shares.
A second list of early settlers, descendants of whom dwell numerously in this county and elsewhere, include Edward Bobit, James Burt, Thomas Coggan, Robert Crosman, Benajah Dunham, William Evins, John Gallop, Giles Gilbert, Joseph Gilbert, Richard Hart, Thomas Harvey, Nicholas Hathaway, William Hodges, Samuel Holloway, Thomas Joans, Aaron Knapp, Henry Leonard, James Leonard, Thomas Lincoln, Sr., Thomas Lincoln, Jr., John Macomber, Clement Maxfield, Edward Rew, Oliver Pur- chase, Ralfe Russell, William Sheppard, Giles Slocum, Richard Stacey, Robert Thornton, Christopher Thrasher, John Tisdale, John Turner, James Walker, James Wiatt, Jacob Wilson.
Taunton families had hardly become settled in their new holdings and built them their shelters-and Taunton was still Cohannet-when the settlement was called upon to share in representation at the court of the Pilgrims, at Plymouth. "Taunton began to be added to this booke" is first found in the Colonial Court Records, under date of October 2, 1637, although the historians have shown that it must have been entered there after March 3, 1640, since it was not until then that the act was passed that "Cohannet shall be called Taunton." And then, December 4, 1638, appears the record that "John Strong is sworne constable of Cohannett until June next"; and again, on March 5, 1639, there came the General Court's order that "Captain Poole shall exercise the inhabitants in their arms"-the two officers representing the "civil and military existence and authority of the ancient Cohannet."
Afterwards, in due order, came the General Court decrees for the grants and disposal of the lands at Taunton and the fixing of boun- daries, the Cohannet lands being laid out by order of the court in May, 1639, by Captain Myles Standish and John Browne, and bounded by the same men, in 1640, by order of the court. In June, 1639, therefore, Cap- tain William Poole, John Gilbert and Henry Andrews first represented Taunton at the Plymouth General Court, at a time when a number of the "Mayflower" Pilgrims were of that membership. The last General Court of Plymouth, be it stated here, met July, 1691, the date that has been accepted as marking the close of the Colonial period, the Old Colony hav- ing been divided in 1685 into the three counties of Plymouth, Barnstable and Bristol. These were local epoch-making days, for on March 3, 1640, the Indian name Cohannet, or Quahannock, was changed to Taunton, and the first bounds of the town were set by the Plymouth Court. The town- ship then comprised a territory of sixty-four square miles, or more than 40,000 acres.
The dissatisfaction with dominant religious institutions and conditions in England, that Governor William Bradford himself asserted was the
69
THE TAUNTON NORTH AND SOUTH PURCHASE
cause of the emigration of the "Mayflower" Pilgrims, extended to shipload after shipload that followed, and among whose passengers were Taunton's first settlers-some Independents, many Congregationalists, here and there a few of the Church of England; some Baptists and some Quakers. Others came here for new fortunes' sake, having set before them the lure of broader spaces and the attractive task of sharing in building the western settlements.
As for Taunton settlers themselves, they were mostly from Somerset, Dorset, Devon and Gloucester; and those like the Deane leaders who hailed from Taunton, in Somersetshire, were influential enough to have the naming of Taunton, as thus stated in a report made at a town meeting: "Whereas by the Providence of God, in the year 1638 and the year 1639, it pleased God to bring the most part of the first purchasers of Taunton over the great ocean into this wilderness from our dear and native land . .. in honor and love of our dear and native country, we called this place Taunton. Signed by James Walker, John Richmond, Thomas Leonard, Joseph Wilbore, John Hall, Richard Williams and Walter Deane." And, as every schoolboy in Taunton now knows, the etymology of Taunton is thus, "Tain Ton," Gaelic and Saxon words, meaning "the town on the banks of the river," and so situated are both the mother town and the city in New England. And here, one of a little colony of towns, drifted away from the Old World, strove for the peculiar vantages of self-determination, with results that generations have been proud to own.
CHAPTER II.
THE TAUNTON NORTH AND SOUTH PURCHASE
"Provided leave can be procured from Ousamequin (Massasoit)." The phrase, as contained in an order from the Plymouth Court of 1643, relat- ing to a proposed purchase of lands for Taunton, voices the considerate and just spirit of the colonial executives themselves in their first relation- ships with the Indian holders of lands, however the white man may have mistreated the red man since that time.
In the case from which the quotation is made, the Plymouth Court were desirous of knowing what Chief Massasoit thought of the matter. His sanction was sought in the dealing, for in those times just payments were made in land transactions, and large reservations of land were set aside for the Indians. It is of continuous record that as fast as the English settlements extended, the colonial government extinguished by fair purchase the Indian titles. And it sometimes happened that double trans- fers occasioned deeds of conveyance both from the Indians and the Colonial government. Thus was Tetiquet bought of the Indians by Miss Poole, and confirmed to her by the court. These are main facts, in spite of isolated cases of annulment of the natives' rights.
Whenever we think of those hardy settlers whom we have recorded in New England history as First Purchasers, it is a very rare thing for us to give due regard to the land values at the time of their purchase,
70
BRISTOL COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS
particularly here in Bristol county, or to the sort of exchanges that were made during the purchase, or to the usages that were soon established to secure such exchange. We have done but little more than set down their names as original purchasers, and as those of founders of towns and an- cestors of many families of our times. We give too little heed to the transactions themselves, that were performed under a provision of the General Court, to the effect that no group of settlers could go into the wilderness and buy lands indiscriminately of the natives. That was one of the fundamental dealings between civilization and the people of the wil- derness. The earlier historians have quoted very nearly in full from scores of old deeds and agreements and colonial records, so that the already fully published results of their minute research need not be reduplicated by any successor. It is now the province of historical publishment by no means to annul any of the results of the comprehensive labors of the old clerks of history; but it is preferable, with the almost miraculous developments of nearly a half century awaiting introduction, to offer chiefly the vital essen- tials of the forefathers' day.
From this viewpoint, we may discern the course of the business-like acquisition of properties from the first holdings of the settlers, through the North and South Purchases, and the precinct and town establish- ments. It was an irreparable loss to Taunton when the fire of 1838 de- stroyed town records, among which was the deed of the original Cohannet, signed by Chief Massasoit, though his son Philip (Metacomet) made a confirmatory deed of the same March 22, 1683, that has been preserved; the Plymouth Colonial Records also having kept intact that report of Myles Standish and John Browne, who in 1640 established the bounds of the Eight Mile Square, Taunton's original territory of sixty-four square miles, or more than 40,000 acres; likewise the report of their boundary of Miss Poole's lands in Tetiquet; and again, the nearly as valuable record of the Hooke and Street lands at Berkley-their four hundred acres of upland and thirty of meadow that after their departure to New Haven became the property of John Hathaway, Edward Bobbit and Timothy Holloway, founders of their families here.
Then, in later years, to verify and realize to us the bounds of that distant period, the late James Edward Seaver in 1892 prepared and published a map of that long square, wherein have been definitely set down the places where the first settlers were to be found at the outset of civilized life. Upon that invaluable map are to be seen the lines of the ancient roads and paths, and the home-lots of the pioneers, as well as the many river landings. The plantation as thus set down in record and map (based in part upon the Morgan Cobb drawings of 1727), was bought of Ousamequin, so state the Plymouth Court books, but for what consideration that section was purchased, we know not.
Yet the Eight Mile Square could not encompass within its limits the ยท increasing population who were discovering values for themselves in the wood and river lands; for in 1642 came the request from Taunton for the purchase of more wood and pasture land. The General Court was ready to grant the request, and "that the best and speediest means be used to procure their further enlargement on that side of the main river to answer
71
THE TAUNTON NORTH AND SOUTH PURCHASE
to Mr. Hooke and Mr. Streete's farms on the other side; and whereas they desire the neck of Assonet for pasturing young beasts, it is also granted, provided leave can be procured from Ousamequin."
The colony was now continuously stretching out for the unused nearby lands, and but four years later, June 2, 1646, the General Court gave tne town permission to purchase a calf pasture-the locally celebrated "calves pasture" near Nemasket pond. It was this lot, a landmark, that was con- veyed to Henry Andrews, April 11, 1647, in payment for the building of the town's first meeting house. The southern boundary of the town re- mained undefined until 1663, when it was fixed by the General Court. The settlers had for some years borne in mind the fact that a strip of land two miles in width, known to them as the "Two Mile Strip," separated the Eight Mile Square from Tetiquet. Therefore, as a result of their petitions, in 1665 the General Court granted this strip to William Brett, Thomas Haward, Sr., Arthur Harris, Richard Williams, John Willis and John Carey, "to each of them three score acres of land lying betwixt the lands of Taunton and Tetiquet." The centre of the Taunton that was to be was now defined by the lands contained within these boundaries named. To the north and to the south, other Europeans were entering and making their homes-"purchased of the Indians" being the frequently recurring phrase in all records and agreements of the time. And there the final ex- tensive purchases of territory of the mother town were to be made, which territory, so joined onto the nucleus, would one day peacefully secede for the establishment of yet other townships.
.
The northwest corner of the Plymouth Patent, still remaining under Indian ownership, was purchased of Alexander (Wamsutta), son of Massa- soit, in 1661, by Captain Thomas Willett, enterprising settler (and later the first English mayor of New York). This purchase was made, in all likelihood, at the suggestion of the General Court, who placed it in the hands of a committee-Thomas Prence, Major Josias Winslow, Thomas Southworth, and Mr. Constant Southworth, to dispose of it for the col- onies' use. Part of this newly acquired property became what is known as the Rehoboth North Purchase, the remainder, fifty square miles, being still in the Colony's possession, and bounded by the Massachusetts Patent on the north, Bridgewater on the east, Taunton on the south, and Rehoboth North Purchase on the west, Taunton's north corner, known as Cobbler's Corner, projecting at the south. It again appeared to be Taunton's oppor- tunity to come into new possessions; thereupon, June 6, 1668, a deed was granted to fifty-two purchasers. The men of early time were buying lands not as they buy them in the west of our day, with some large outlook for fortune-making, but chiefly to establish a home site and to till lands and to live the simple life of the pioneer, separated by an ocean from native land.
Thus the North Purchase was joined onto Taunton-an area contain- ing 32,000 acres, and one hundred pounds being the price that was paid. In the deed there soon were made those lesser changes, when the name of George Shove was inserted with the others, and the two parcels of John Bundy and Thomas Briggs were excepted from the sale. Compli- cations presenting themselves, that were soon solved, were contained in such cases as these: One claim of ownership was raised through Josias, Peter and David Hunter, Tetiquet Indians, who for the consideration of a
72
BRISTOL COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS
little over three pounds gave a quit-claim deed. In 1689, again, Major William Bradford put in a claim for Taunton territory, and once more satisfaction was obtained by a quit-claim deed. From such sources, the Taunton North Purchase came into possession of both English and Indian titles.
The South Purchase, along the meadowlands of the river, south, was attracting settlers, also. This noteworthy purchase required several town votes before James Walker and John Richmond could be empowered to "purchase the land of the Indians in the behalfe of the town of Taunton, lying on the west side of Taunton river, from the Three Mile River down to a place called the Store House."
Eventually, October 1, 1672, King Philip, Anawan and others signed the deed whereby a tract three miles long on the Great river, as the Teti- quet was sometimes called, and extending westerly four miles, beginning at the mouth of Three Mile river, came into the hands of Taunton colonists, the consideration being one hundred and forty-three pounds. On that day, also, King Philip, upon receipt of forty-seven pounds, conveyed to Constant Southworth, assistant at the General Court, another strip on the south of the first tract, one mile wide, on the Great river, and extending four miles westerly from the river, Southworth immediately assigning this deed to the committee of the first deed. Both deeds were paid for to the extent of one hundred and ninety pounds.
Again, on September 27, 1672, Constant Southworth assigned a prior mortgage on the whole (from Philip and the colony) to William Harvey and John Richmond, in behalf of the town, for the sum of eighty-three pounds. So that the South Purchase cost two hundred and seventy-three pounds, in all. By a declaratory deed of November 26, 1672, the four- mile square tract was conveyed to the parties interested, eighty-seven persons being named as probable owners at that time; but on March 18, 1683-4, another declaratory deed was made to but seventy-seven of that list, as it is likely entire compliance was not made with the conditions in the deed.
Up to this time the natives, from whom all the Taunton purchases had been made, with or without a confirmatory deed from the government, had refused to part with Assonet Neck, which is two miles long and less than one mile wide. But this, the first seizure by the colony, was taken in 1675, to pay the expenses of the Indian wars, its value being placed at two hundred pounds. This land was added to Taunton in July, 1682, but when Dighton was incorporated, in 1712, it was included in that town, and later on added to Berkley, in 1799. Another indication of earliest colonial and native dealings with local territory is found in Governor Thomas Hinckley's confirmatory deed of 1685, in which it is shown that the first purchase of Taunton's Eight Mile Square was made from Massasoit.
Finally, two more complications with regard to this territory were solved when, in 1689, Major William Bradford, making some claim to all this territory, was paid twenty pounds, giving a deed of release and con- firmation to John Poole and one hundred and three others. The other instance occurred in 1672, when a controversy over the new territory made between Taunton and Swansea was settled by the addition of a
73
THE FIRST COMERS TO TAUNTON
corner of Swansea, known as the Two Mile Purchase, to a part of Dighton. Now it will be seen that the entire set of Purchases amounted to 150 square miles, or approximately 100,000 acres.
Confirming much that has been written with regard to the earliest intention to deal honestly with the natives, is that often-quoted letter of John Richmond, son of the first settler in Taunton of that name, to Lieu- tenant-Colonel Elisha Hutchinson and others, dated April 30, 1698, to be seen at the State Archives, Vol. 113, p. 167, thus: "We bought it first of Woosamequin in the year 39 or 40 (this was in my minority) ; the sum paid I know not; then we bought all again of Philip, and paid him 16 pounds for it; then we bought that very spot of Josiah, he claiming some land there, as appears by his deed; then we bought that spot again, with other land, of Major Bradford, and he had 20 pounds more."
After the division of lands, from the first possession of the home lot to the complete distribution of the whole territory, many years after the first settlement, the North and South Purchases steadily increased as to their population, and the demand arose for the setting off of portions of the settlement into precincts. The first of such petitions was from the North Purchase and a part of old Taunton township, dated November 2, 1707, and signed by forty-three townsmen, who asked for a minister to become settled among them. There were remonstrants who desired a township rather than a precinct, and the controversy, as it progressed, became a very warm one. But on June 12, 1711, the bill was passed for raising the new town of Norton, though but two years previously the prospect of a precinct was by far the more encouraging one. In the mean- time, similar demands for a precinct were made by settlers in the South Purchase "by reason of the remoteness from the meeting house," and thereupon the precinct was established, September 16, 1709, though the town, Dighton, soon after petitioned for, was raised May 30, 1712.
From that time onwards, for nearly twenty years, no more territorial changes took place here. But then arose petitions and counter-petitions, the new movement resulting in the creation of the town of Raynham, April 1, 1731. Then Berkley asked for recognition as a town, and the act of raising the town was passed April 18, 1735; and finally, in 1879, Myricks, by vote, was taken from Taunton and added to Berkley. In this way, and for reasons of "remoteness from the meeting house" and the centre- though there were local industrial reasons, too, the iron forges and the grist and other mills sharing in the later groupings of the interests of the population-the new towns withdrew from the mother town. Economical and industrial, and, according to the statements in the petitions, religious forces, had performed their distributive tasks. Territorially, the region was getting ready to welcome the newcomer, the new era, and the ex- panding town and city of Taunton.
CHAPTER III. THE FIRST COMERS TO TAUNTON
The insistence of the leading importance of present-day events and people in these volumes is undeniable. The story of our own day and its
74
BRISTOL COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS
directing forces and the individuals that control them is the intimate narrative of our generation, verifying to us the issues of our remarkable times. But there was also a day of the First Comers, that even at this hour is a continuous portion of history, and cannot be annulled. No one appreciates this more than the New Englander and the thousands of de- scendants of the first New Englanders. The founders who ventured into the wilderness-the sturdy, hard-working yeomen, with their faults and frailties too-let them have place in our vision.
Though Elizabeth Poole did not buy "Taunton," as the popular ac- count sometimes has it, but only a small portion of the eastern borders of the then unoccupied territory, it is the brief narrative of her coming here that shall always remain like a star in the crown of the beginnings of the city. We have been told of her arrival from England to Tetiquet by way of Dorchester, and how she actively interested herself in every fundamental project of the busy settlement. Were she living today, every cause of civic, religious and industrial advancement would at least have her approval.
To all appearances, her brother, Captain William Poole, came here when his sister did, but though they both went to Dorchester first, he is not mentioned here as of 1637, the year of Elizabeth's arrival. Whatever the reasons of the latter may have been for settling at Tetiquet, it is evi- dent from all other accounts, as well as from the wording of her will, that she was a Puritan woman of piety, with inbred reverence for the religious life and the means to religion. She was interested in establishing a church here, according to her teaching and light, and with William Hooke and Nicholas Street, Oxford University graduates, she did begin that church. It is plain, too, that here she was accorded equality of rights, whether in the purchase of lands, in the sharing of iron works holdings, or in the establishment of religious interests.
Taunton military men of today may salute the memory of the first of their local captains, William Poole. As soon as there were men enough here to form a military company, and that was only two years after it is recorded that the town was settled, Captain Poole, brother of Elizabeth Poole, was appointed by the General Court the captain, and ordered to exercise the inhabitants in their arms. He may be said to have been the Myles Standish of the village, and both in 1646 and 1658 he was chosen a member of the Colony Council of War. He lived to be more than eighty years of age, but years before he died he went back to Dorchester to reside, and while there he was not only the town's schoolmaster, but also clerk of writs and registrar of the vital records of the town for about ten years. He was a "revered, pious man of God," remark the Dorchester records. He had three sons and two daughters, born in Taunton, namely, John, Nathaniel and Timothy, and Mary and Bethesda. Timothy met his death by drowning, and John went into business in Boston, and it was through him that his aunt Elizabeth's property came to the Borland fam- ily, from whom it was confiscated at the time of the Revolution. John married Elizabeth, a daughter of William Brenton, who lived in Taunton many years, and from whom the famed Haliburton family of Nova Scotia claim descent.
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.