USA > Massachusetts > Suffolk County > Boston > Genealogical and personal memoirs relating to the families of Boston and eastern Massachusetts > Part 2
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45 | Part 46 | Part 47 | Part 48 | Part 49 | Part 50 | Part 51 | Part 52 | Part 53 | Part 54 | Part 55 | Part 56 | Part 57 | Part 58 | Part 59 | Part 60 | Part 61 | Part 62 | Part 63 | Part 64 | Part 65 | Part 66 | Part 67 | Part 68 | Part 69 | Part 70 | Part 71 | Part 72 | Part 73 | Part 74 | Part 75 | Part 76 | Part 77 | Part 78 | Part 79 | Part 80 | Part 81 | Part 82 | Part 83 | Part 84 | Part 85 | Part 86 | Part 87 | Part 88 | Part 89 | Part 90 | Part 91 | Part 92 | Part 93 | Part 94 | Part 95 | Part 96 | Part 97 | Part 98 | Part 99 | Part 100 | Part 101 | Part 102 | Part 103 | Part 104 | Part 105 | Part 106 | Part 107
67. Fitch: In the male line soon extinct : but through a daughter there are descendants.
68. Clark: Two children, two daughters, of the second generation in one case, one son and daughters only in the other. In the second case the only son had two daughters who mar- ried. A sister of the only son died "a child- less widow;" her sister had four children.
4
BOSTON AND EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS.
Other lines of this family in Boston have been distinguished for their number and influence.
69. Bromfield: One daughter and a son of the second generation ; and several sons and daughter of the third have carried the name and family down to 1849.
70. Payne : An only son, who died in 1735. left a large family.
71. Taylor : Of two sons of the second gen- eration, one died unmarried ; the other had only two daughters.
72. Eliot: The descendants of the first member are now mostly in Connecticut; the second member had only daughters; the third had the same : and the fourth had two sons and several daughters. Of three male members of a later generation two died without issue. Another noted family of this name, more prop- erly spelled Elliott, adopted at a later period the shorter spelling.
73. Belcher: The father of the Boston family of this name had daughters, and one son who was governor of the province. The governor had a daughter and two sons. Another branch of the family early in Boston was less distinguished.
74. Williams: One branch of this family is descended from an early schoolmaster, 1703- 1734, well connected by marriage. "Many other bearers of the name have lived here, but most of them are probably descendants of Robert Williams, of Roxbury."
75. Winslow : "Little can be found in print about the Boston line." The family is de- scended from John, a brother of Governor Edward. This John had daughters, and six surviving sons. The male line in this family was prominent, especially from 1740 to 1770. Others were merchants in the city "within the memory of the present generation." Other branches also have been well represented.
76. Willard: Beginning with a pastor of the Old South Church, having by two wives, twenty-one children. The only descendants of the name, however, are traced to a son, by whose son was preseved the line to the present generation. Another son of the first generation, was twice married, but left no sons.
77. Walley: Two sons of the second gen- eration ; one had daughters and a son. This last married and had two sons; one died with- out issue, and the other had daughters, besides a son (who had twelve children) and a son, who had a son, who was a "distinguished citi- zen of only a few years ago."
78. Ballentine: In the second generation
there were twelve children. "The name fre- quently occurs on our records."
79. Valentine: The founder died in 1724, having had seven children. The eldest son went to England. Other sons were of Hop- kinton and Fall River; "but many of the de- scendants of the name have returned to Bos- ton, and have been engaged in business here."
80. Cushing: The first representative in Boston had several children. "The family has been especially famous for the number of judges it has furnished," and many of the name "have been citizens liere."
81. Bowdoin (Huguenot element) : Two sons in the second generation ; one went to Virginia, "where his descendants still live." The other was thrice married, and had daugh- ters and sons who married. A grandson was Governor of the State; his only son left no issue : and two daughters were married into distinguished names. A son of one of the two daughters, last named, took the name of Bowdoin, as did his son, "but this line is ex- tinct."
82. Faneuil: Three brothers of this name were settled as early as 1691. One returned to France, another acquired a large fortune, and died in 1737-38, leaving a nephew, who gave to Boston "Faneuil Hall." The remain- ing brother had two sons and several sisters ; one of these sons died in 1785, having had two sons and a daughter ; one of the sons became a refugee and died in England ; the other after a stay in Canada and the West Indies, returned to Boston after the revolutionary war.
83. Johonnot : The first, a member of the Huguenot church, died in 1748, leaving three sons and a daughter. The descendants of later generations have been numerous, and "the name still continues."
84. Olivier (Huguenot) : Fifteen children of the progenitor were born between 1712 and 1731. The name in a few cases was changed to Oliver, "but the family was represented here in 1850."
85. Sigourney: The family ancestor died here in 1727, aged 89; a son married and had three daughters and three sons. One of the latter had twelve children; another had ten children ; and another had five children. "The name has been widely spread in this com- munity."
86. Brimmer: The founder was born in Germany in 1697, and married here, and had three daughters and a son, all married. A son of the later generation was mayor of Bos- ton and died in 1847. The name still exists.
5
BOSTON AND EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS.
87. Mascarene (distinguished Huguenot an- cestry) : The original representative here was a soldier, but married and made Boston his home. He had an only son and three married daughters. The son died in 1778, leaving an only son who died unmarried. In another line were a few male representatives of a late gen- eration.
88. Bethune: Dates from about 1724. "By the death of the senior representatives the heir of this line now is the head of the family." The representatives in the male line are not numerous.
89. Cunningham: The family came here about 1680. There were three sons of the second generation. The line has been prolific in comparison with some of the families previ- ously named. "This family has contributed largely towards building up the town."
90. Boylston : The name has had numerous influential male representatives in Boston and vicinity since 1653. A member of the female line had fourteen children, and one of her sons taking the name of Boylston, became a wealthy merchant in London, and left descendants of this name.
91. Trail: Two brothers were residents about 1750: and others of this name, possibly their relatives, were here at the same date, and probably left descendants.
92. Mountfort: The family "spring from three brothers"-all here about 1660. One had two sons. The male portion has been well represented to very nearly the present time.
93. Greenwood: The founder died here in 1684: had two sons, and one of these had five sons. "Several other branches of the family resided here."
94. Charnock: First prominent in 1710. there were two sons of the second generation, also daughters. One son had three children, who died unmarried.
95. Martyn : one member died here in 1700: his cousin left will of 1717, in which is named four sons and five daughters. The family has been continued here and the name is often en- countered.
96. Cooper: The first to come here in 1678 was sent here to learn business. There were two sons of the second generation. In the male line this name has been prominent, and the members numerous. Another branch of this name, beginning in 1755, became promi- nent in the South : one of them being adjutant- general, U. S. A., and then resigned to join the Confederate side, 1861-65.
97. Lynde : The first member of this family
was in Boston, 1650, was married, and had three sons. The first and second sons had each a married daughter. The second son had a son, and both father and son were chief- justices of the province ( one from 1728 to 1746, and the other, who succeeded his father, in 1746. from 1771 to 1772).
98. Gardiner: The first comer was a physi- cian and also a merchant : became a refugee. and returned after the war : had three wives, and left issue, one son and four daughters. The son had distinguished descendants. One of the grandsons of the original member, being in the female line, took name of Gardiner.
99. Amory: The first member settled about 1721 in Boston : had three sons, and the male line has been numerous.
100. Waldo: The first member was of Bos- ton in 1697. A second member. ancestor of a branch, came about the same time. The male line has been well represented.
No one is so foolish as to believe such a list as the above is absolute. Mr. Whitmore. its author, never made any such claim; and asserted that other families equally worthy were entitled ( presumably ) to a place in the list. However, as arranged, it is suggestive. The basis is wealth and official distinction, as existing in the colonies. It is also interesting to notice the rise and fall of the families through the medium of an increased or lessened birth-rate, and also the effect upon them of the influence of longevity.
In the second place, as it is natural that the best ability should gravitate towards the metro- polis, such as Boston then was and is now. men of that character and their family repre- sentatives would in the nature of the case be fewer in their numerical importance as fami- lies, regardless of their "natural increase," or birth-rate: and so the selected number "one hundred" is not absurd, but furnishes an idea of the relative size of the "ruling influence" in the capital, as well as in the colony at large ; and. in comparison, their numbers would not be as great as those of their more numerous compeers in the country districts, from whom were drawn in the course of events recruits to swell the urban population and occasionally the upper classes.
In the lists which follow it is impossible to confine the numbers to one hundred, for the standard set embraces a much larger number of the so-called common people ; nor will the length of the lists admit of the particular speci- fication of the former. The lists also do not take into account the still much greater num-
6
BOSTON AND EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS.
ber of the first settlers who remained here permanently, or those who after a short stay returned to the mother country. and who were never elected to any prominent office in this community. In the seaports at that time was a floating population of considerable propor- tions. composed of mariners and others, whose stay in one place was short from the nature of the circumstances. Armies composed of regiments from abroad were occasionally sta- tioned in Boston, or on the islands near it, for a period of several months at a time. The names of such wanderers, and they are occa- sionally found in the local records, are a puzzle to the genealogist.
It should be distinctly understood that the great land company which settled Massachu- setts, first with headquarters located in Eng- land, and afterwards in this country, was a close corporation, the English government re- garding it simply as an instrument for trading in certain territory on this side of the ocean, which it considered as a part of its realm. The idea of the colonists to set up a govern- ment of their own, with laws not repugnant to those of the mother country, is another matter. It can be shown that a large degree of prosperity attended the movement ; that by 1700 communities with many of the blessings of agriculture and of the home country were firmly established ; that good houses were com- mon; that the people generally were content to abide under their own "vine and fig-tree." That by 1736, a hundred years after the estab- lishment of their first college, according to the testimony of an authority of that day, the pro- vince was distinguished among the British colonies for its pleasant homes, its wholesome laws, its privileges of education, its learned men, its good government, the general knowl- edge of the common people, and in which good land all were as happy as any on earth.
In 1770, after the unwise oppression of a reasonably prosperous province by the British government had begun, the condition of the average inhabitant of the country town was fairly well described in an election sermon of that year, by a village minister living not re- mote from the metropolis. In passing the reader will observe that the troubles about climate are definitely alluded to. This author- ity says: "There is in the close of our short summer the appearance of plenty in our dwell- ings ; but, from the length of our winters, our plenty is consumed, and the one-half of our necessary labor is spent in dispersing to our flocks and herds the ingatherings of the fore-
going season ; and it is known to every person of common observation that few, very few, except in the mercantile way, from one genera- tion to another, acquire more than a neces- sary subsistence, and sufficient to discharge the expenses of government and the support of the gospel, yet content and disposed to lead peaceable lives."
Applying the principle of Mr. Whitmore's plan to the selection of a list of prominent families in other counties of Massachusetts than Suffolk, we find that their number can be greatly extended, the period being still the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, or the time covered by the colonial and provincial periods of New England history. In the esti- mation of the people of old New England (John Farmer, "Genealogical Register of the First Settlers," 1829) the official society of the community consisted of the governors, deputy governors, assistants (or councillors), the ministers of the gospel, representatives of the general courts, graduates of Harvard College, the members of the Ancient and Honorable Artillery Company, and the freeman (or voters) of the colony, especially those of the period (when church membership was a quali- fication) from 1630 to 1662, in Massachusetts. Mellen Chamberlain, a good legal authority, in his "History of Chelsea," in passim, claims that the original Massachusetts Bay Company was a close corporation, "to which no one was admitted unless a member of the church estab- lished within its limits ; but when communities had gathered remote from the seat of govern- ment. there were local duties and rights, not specified by general laws, in which it was de- sirable that some, not freeman, should share ; and in 1647 the general court authorized the freemen in towns to choose inhabitants, not freemen, to vote in specified affairs under cer- tain conditions. By the charter of 1692, Mass- achusetts became more clearly a local body politic with enlarged powers, instead of a great land company located in England, and in 1693 the General Court determined who should be freeholders and inhabitants, with their qualifications as voters in town meetings ; but these matters were practically determined by the selectmen, who, sharing the popular feeling, seldom used their power of exclusion or of challenge in town-meeting of any person, voting by a show of hands, especially in poli- tical affairs.
"The nature of the First Charter, and the powers granted by it, have been the subject of controversy. The English government re-
7
BOSTON AND EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS.
garded it as a corporation in the kingdom for trading in the territory described in the instru- ment. with the power of making rules for that purpose, according to the course of other cor- porations in the realm; while the colonists claimed the power to set up a government pro- per, and make laws not repugnant to those of Great Britain."
Again, while giving a history of the Eng- lish claim, under the subject of "Allotments of Land." Judge Chamberlain states: "The history of the Charter is interesting Probably the King intended to grant only such powers as would enable the Company in Eng- land to carry on its business in Massachusetts with a local government." But for various reasons, "in the opinion of some good English lawyers, it could be legally transferred to Mass- achusetts . . . . And this latter seems to have been the opinion of Winthrop and his asso- ciates, for no sooner were they set down in Boston Bay than they acted on that view of their powers. This explains many things which seem very extraordinary to some in our day."
On the other hand, Farmer ("Genealogical Register")* representing the opinion current among the greater number of the orthodox New Englanders when he wrote ( 1829) lays greater stress on the ecclesiasticism of the situation, and quotes on his title-page two authorities, one of the Puritans, and the other of a later and more advanced member of the clerical profession.
"Multitudes of pious, peaceable Protestants were driven to leave their native country, and seek a refuge for their lives and liberties, with freedom for the worship of God, in a wilder- ness, in the ends of the earth." -- Dr. John Owen.
"Our ancestors, though not perfect and in-
*Note .- The monumental dictionary of James Savage is an enlargement of Farmer's work, and on the same lines. In his preface Savage says the five classes of persons prominent, such as gover- nors, deputy-governors, assistants, ministers in all the colonies. representatives in that of Massachu- setts to 1692, and graduates of Harvard College to 1662. members of the Ancient and Honorable Artil- lery Company, and freemen in Massachusetts alone, are features of Farmer's book. Savage agrees on 1692 as fixing an absolute limit. He states that nineteen-twentieths of the people of New England colonies in 1775 were descendants of those found here in 1692, and probably seven-eighths of them were offspring of the settlers before 1642. At the time when Savage wrote (1860) he considered that more than four-fifths of our people still counted their progenitors among the ante-revolutionary colonists.
It was Savage's opinion after twenty years' work on the subject, that the record of the first three generations of the first settlers bordered upon "uni- versal genealogy," and thus the difficulties perti- nent to the next century of their descendants are made evident.
fallible in all respects, were a religious, brave, and virtuous set of men, whose love of liberty, civil and religious, brought them from their native land into the American desert."-Dr. Jonathan Mayhew.
PROMINENT FAMILIES.
The following list of prominent families in Massachusetts in the seventeenth century is based on the rule established by the celebrated John Farmer, in 1829:
ESSEX COUNTY.
I. Abbot. 44. Coldam.
2. Adams.
45. Conant.
3. Alling.
46. Cowdry.
4. Andrews.
47. Cross.
5. Appleton.
48. Curwin.
6. Avery. 49. Cushing.
7. Axey. 50. Dane.
8. Ayers. 51. Davenport.
9. Baker. 52. Davis.
10. Ballard. 53. Davison.
II. Barker. 54. Denison.
12. Barnard. 55. Dillingham.
13. Barney. 56. Dodge.
14. Bartholomew. 57. Downing.
15. Bartlett. 58. Dresser.
16. Batchelor.
59. Dummer.
17. Batt.
60. Eastman.
18. Batter.
61. Easton.
19. Belcher.
62. Eastow.
20. Belknap.
63. Eliot.
21. Bishop. 64. Ellery.
22. Blackleach.
65. Emerson.
23. Blowers. 66. Emery.
24. Boreman.
67. Endicott.
25. Boynton.
68. English.
26. Bradbury.
69. Epes.
27. Bradford.
70. Eveleth.
28. Bradstreet.
71. Fairfield.
29. Bridges.
72. Feake.
30. Brown.
73. Fiske.
31. Bruen.
74. Fitch.
32. Burge.
75. Fogg.
33. Burrill.
76. Foote.
34. Buswell.
77. Foster.
35. Capen. 78. Fowler.
36. Carleton. 79. Freeman.
37. Caulkins.
80. French.
38. Chalice. 81. Friend.
39. Cheever.
82. Fuller.
40. Clark.
83. Gardner.
41. Clement.
84. Gedney.
42. Cobbett. 85. Gerrish.
43. Colby.
86. Giddings.
8
BOSTON AND EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS.
87. Gilbert. 88. Goodhue.
144. Nicholet.
201. Stileman.
224. Waller. 225. Wallis.
89. Gott.
146. Norden. 203. Symmes.
226. Walton.
90. Gould.
147. Norris.
204. Symonds.
227. Ward.
91. Green.
148. Northend.
205. Tenney.
228. Weare.
92. Greenleaf.
149. Norton.
206. Tewksbury.
207. Thacher.
230. Wensley.
94. Hall.
151. Olney.
208. Thompson.
231. West.
97. Harrison.
154. Page.
211. Tomlyns.
234. Whiting.
98. Harvey.
155. Paine.
212. Townsend.
235. Whittingham.
99. Haskell.
156. Palfrey.
213. Tracy.
236. Wickham.
100. Hathorne.
157. Palmer.
214. Trask.
237. Wigglesworth.
IOI. Ilaven.
158. Paris.
215. True.
238. Willis.
102. Hendrick.
159. Parker.
216. Tupper.
239. Winthrop.
104. Hirst.
161. Patch.
218. Tuttle.
241. Wood.
105. Hobart. .
162. Payson.
219. Venner.
242. Woodbridge.
106. Hobson.
163. Peabody.
220. Vincent.
243. Woodbury.
107. Holgrave.
164. Pearson.
221. Wade.
244. Woodman.
108. Holliman.
165. Pease.
222. Wainwright.
245. Worcester.
223. Walker.
246. Wright.
IIO. Holyoke.
167. Perley.
MIDDLESEX COUNTY.
I. Allen.
33. Chaplin.
113. Humfrey.
170. Pickard.
2. Ames.
34. Chesholme.
T14. Hussey.
171. Picket.
3. Aspinwall.
35. Child.
115. Hutchins.
172. Pierce.
4. Bailey.
36. Church.
116. Ingalls.
173. Pike.
5. Barrett.
37. Clark.
117. Ingersoll.
174. Pingry.
6. Beecher.
38. Collins.
118. Jaffrey.
175. Platt.
7. Beers.
39. Converse.
119. Jennings.
176. Plummer.
8. Belcher.
40. Cook.
120. Jewett.
177. Price.
9. Blakeman.
11. Cooledge.
121. Johnson.
178. Pritchard.
10. Blodget.
42. Coytemore.
122. Ketcham.
!79. Putnam.
II. Blood.
43. Crosby.
123. Kilham.
180. Rawson.
12. Bond.
44. Crow.
124. Kinsman.
181. Raymond.
13. Bradshaw.
45. Cutler.
125. Kirman.
182. Rayner.
14. Brattle.
46. Cutter.
126. Knight.
183. Read.
15. Bridge.
47. Daggett.
127. Ladd.
184. Redington.
16. Brigham.
48. Danforth.
128. Laighton.
185. Revell.
17. Bright.
49. Davis.
129. Lay.
186. Richardson.
18. Brimsmead.
50. Davison.
130. Lindall.
187. Rogers.
IO. Brock.
51. Denison.
131. Lord.
188. Ruck.
20. Brooks.
52. Dow.
132. Lothrop.
189. Rust.
21. Brown.
53. Drury.
135. Mansfield.
192. Scruggs.
24. Butler.
56. Eliot.
136. Marston.
193. Shepard.
25. Cakebread.
57. Ely.
137. Mawry.
194. Sibley.
26. Call.
58. Estabrook.
I38. Meade.
195. Skelton.
27. Carrington.
59. Evered.
139. Metcalf.
196. Smith.
28. Carter.
60. Eyre.
140. Moody.
197. Spencer.
29. Case.
61. Fairfield.
141. Moulton.
198. Stanley.
30. Chadwick.
62. Fav.
142. Nelson.
199. Stevens.
31. Champney.
63. Feake.
143. Newman.
200. Stickney.
32. Chandler.
64. Fiske.
95. Halsall. 96. Harris.
152. Osgood.
209. Thorndike,
232. Weston.
153. Otley.
210. Titcomb.
233. Whipple.
103. Higginson. 160. Parrott.
217. Turner.
240. Wise.
109. Holmes.
166. Perkins.
III. Howe.
168. Peters.
112. Hubbard.
169. Phillips.
133. Lumpkin. 134. Macy. 191. Sargent.
190. Saltonstall.
22. Bulkley.
54. Dunster.
23. Bunker.
55. Eames.
145. Norcross.
202. Swan.
229. Welles.
93. Ilale. 150. Noyes.
BOSTON AND EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS.
65. Fitch.
122. Lynde.
179. Stebbins.
200. Ward.
66. Flint.
123. Manning.
180. Steele. 201. Warren.
67. Foote.
124. Marion.
181. Stetson. 202. Webb.
68. Foster.
125. Marshall. 182. Stone. 203. Well.
69. Fox.
126. Mason.
183. Straight.
204. Westwood.
70. French. 127. Matthews.
184. Swain.
205. Wheeler.
71. Garfield.
128. Maverick.
185. Symmes.
206. White.
72. Gibbons.
120. Mayhew.
186. Tabor.
207. Whiting.
73. Gibbs.
130. Meriam.
187. Talcott.
208. Wigglesworth.
74. Glover.
131. Minor.
188. Thacher.
209. Wilcocks.
75. Goddard.
132. Mitchell.
189. Thompson.
210. Willard.
76. Goffe. 133. Mitchelson.
190. Todd.
211. Williams.
77. Goodenow. 134. Morrill.
191. Trowbridge.
212. Willoughby.
78. Goodwin. 135. Morse.
102. Tufts.
213. Wincoll.
79. Gookin.
136. Morton.
193. Tyng.
214. Winds.
So. Gould.
137. Mousall.
194. Usher.
215. Winship.
81. Graves.
138. Mygate.
195. Wade.
216. Wolcott.
82. Green.
139. Nowell.
196. Wadsworth.
217. Woodbridge.
83. Greenwood.
140. Noves.
197. Waite.
218. Wooddy.
84. Griffin.
141. Cakes.
198. Waldo.
219. Woodhouse.
199. Walker.
220. Wright.
86. Ilammond.
143. Page.
87. Harlakenden.
144. Palmer.
88. Hart.
145. Parish.
1. Adams.
35. Cook.
2. Alcock.
36. Cornwell.
90. Ilastings.
1.47. Pearson.
3. Allen. 37. Crafts.
91. Hayman.
148. Pelham.
4. Astwood. 38. Crosby.
92. Haynes.
149. Pendleton.
5. Atherton. 39. Curtis.
93. Hayward.
150. Phillips.
6. Avery.
40. Dalton.
94. Henchman.
151. Phips.
7. Baker.
41. Danforth.
95. Hill.
152. Pierce.
8. Barber.
42. Davis.
96. Hoar.
153. Piermont.
9. Bass.
43. Denison.
97. Hobart.
154. Poole.
10. Bates,
44. Dewing.
98. Hooker.
155. Pratt.
11. Bicknell.
45. Dimmock.
99. Hosmer.
156. Prentice.
12. Birchard.
46. Dudley.
100. Hough.
157. Prescott.
13. Blake.
47. Duncan.
IO1. Howard.
158. Prout.
14. Bowker.
48. Dwight.
102. Howe.
159. Rayner.
15. Bowles.
49. Dyer.
103. Isaac.
160. Rice.
16. Boyes.
50. Eliot.
104. Jackson.
161. Richards.
17. Brackett.
51. Farnum.
105. James.
162. Richardson.
18. Brewer.
52. Faxon.
106. Jennison.
163. Russell.
19. Bridgham.
53. Fenn.
107. Johnson.
164. Saltonstall.
20. Bull.
54. Filer.
108. Jones.
165. Saunders.
21. Bumstead.
55. Fisher.
10). Judd.
166. Sedgwick.
22. Burr.
56. Fiske.
110. Kelsey.
167. Shapleigh.
23. Burrows.
57. Flint.
III. King.
168. Shaw.
24. Bursley.
58. Ford.
112. Kingsbury.
169. Shepard.
25. Butler.
59. Foster.
113. Knowles.
170. Sherman.
26. Capen.
60. French.
114. Lane.
1-1. Smedley.
27. Carder.
61. Fuller.
115. Larkin.
172. Smith.
28. Carpenter.
62. Gardner.
116. Latham.
173. Sparhawk.
29. Chapin.
63. Gaylord. 64. Geary.
117. Lewis.
174. Spaulding.
30. Chickering.
118. Long.
175. Spencer.
31. Clap.
65. Gilbert.
119. Looker.
176. Sprague.
32. Clark.
66. Glover.
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.