USA > Massachusetts > Suffolk County > Boston > The parish of the Advent in the city of Boston, a history of one hundred years, 1844-1944 > Part 5
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13
At the same meeting it was further "Resolved: That this Parish
54
THE PARISH OF THE ADVENT
lot on Allston Street was also under discussion. It seemed impolitic to abandon a fairly successful field, and move to the South End; and, therefore, the offer of the Tremont Street lot was declined. The Allston Street lot would afford a church with only about seven hundred sittings, and it was therefore decided to be too small for the purpose. So for the present the plan of moving was abandoned.
The income of the parish at this time was not large, but it was large enough for its absolute needs. There were but few rich people in its congregation; and the small contribu- tions of the many were relied upon rather than the large contributions of the few. The amount (some $700) taken from the alms chest at the door of the church in each year showed that its silent appeal for the poor was not overlooked; and in many ways there was evidence that the work was quietly going on, the foundation of much good to come. It was at that time the only Episcopal church in the city having a choir of men and boys ; and as it had, therefore, its choice of the boys' voices of the city, its music was exceptionally good. Its choir procession before and after the service was a novelty, and soon the use of surplices for the men and boys added considerable dignity to the service. Still, the parish was not popular with the masses; and its services did not receive that encouragement which they ought to have had. But, notwithstanding this, the parish determined to remove, if it could procure a better site for its work.
In the spring of 1862 it was learned that an estate on Bowdoin Street, formerly occupied by a Congregational society,"2 could be procured for the sum of $30,000. Full
will entertain no projects for the erection of a Church under its auspices, other than the free Church provided for in its indenture of 1847, until the trusts thereby instituted shall have been fully exe- cuted."]
22 [The Bowdoin Street Church, built in 1825 by a Congregational Society of which the Rev. Lyman Beecher had been the first minister (1826-1832). In the meantime several other building sites had been considered and rejected.]
»
55
THE YEARS 1858-1869
power was at once given to a committee to negotiate for the purchase of the same "at such price and upon such terms as they may deem expedient." The financial problem, however, was a serious one; but it was solved through the generosity of Dr. George C. Shattuck. Two years before he had agreed to give a sum of money as an endowment when a certain fund was free to his use. He now offered to make a payment of the sum of $20,000 in anticipation and in satisfaction of all his liabilities to the parish under his previous agreement, provided that it should be held in such a manner as "to secure a permanent trust fund for the support of the clergy of this parish of the full value of not less than $20,000 capital," permission being given, however, to invest it under certain conditions in the parish property. Accordingly, the parish released Dr. Shattuck from any liability under his original instrument of donation as modified by him; and its treasurer was instructed, upon the receipt of the $20,000, to purchase the mortgages on the Green Street property in the manner required, and to take an assignment of them in the name of the wardens and vestry of the parish in their cor- porate capacity as a trust fund for the support of the clergy, and to pay the interest on those mortgages as it accrued regularly for the purposes for which the trust was estab- lished.
It was not, however, until Easter, 1863, that the "trus- tees of the building fund, under the indenture of February 1, 1847," were instructed "to purchase with the funds that are or may be in their hands the land and meeting-house now belonging to the Congregational society on Bowdoin Street as and for a permanent house of worship for the use of this parish." Soon it was reported that all the necessary money was in hand, and the trustees of the building fund contracted for the purchase of this property.
The next question for consideration was what should be done with the building. Its interior resembled most Con- gregational meeting-houses of its time. Against the wall,
.
THE BOWDOIN STREET CHURCH
57
THE YEARS 1858-1869
opposite the entrance, there was a high platform, on which there was a large reading-desk, with chairs and a sofa be- hind it ; and in front, on the floor, was a small table. It was necessary that all these should be removed, and the altar set up in its place, with a proper rail and choir seats. As the church was a free church, it was also desirable that the pew doors should be removed. Moreover, the treatment of the wall behind the altar was a matter of serious consideration ; and it was evident that, when the building was altered to meet any proposed plan, it could not be churchlike in appearance. The question, therefore, naturally came to some of the more zealous members of the parish whether it would not be bet- ter to rebuild entirely, or else to alter the building so radi- cally that its present lines would be lost. The advice of Mr. Richard Upjohn, the architect, was taken; and later he appeared before the corporation with plans, which were ex- plained, and seemed to be so far acceptable that a committee was appointed to procure funds to carry them out.
It was soon evident, however, that the parish was not united as to the expediency of expending the money neces- sary for the purpose, and consequently plans for altering the building on a less ambitious scale were adopted, although only after much discussion. The points of discussion may seem small; but they were based upon principle, and hence were important. One question was whether the reredos should be of stucco, representing wood or stone, and hence, in the contemptuous language of one of the corporation, a "sham," than which nothing could be worse in a place where the truth was to be taught. Another question was as to whether or not the altar should be raised well above the chancel floor, so as to give it the prominence which it was be- lieved it should have. Stucco was cheaper than carving, and the altar, if lower, would cause less remark than if raised, as proposed; and expediency gained the day. The alterations were finished so that the church was first occupied on Palm
58
THE PARISH OF THE ADVENT
Sunday, March 20, 1864; and in the following October the Green Street property was sold.
In December, 1869, the rector realizing, apparently, that he had done for the parish all that he could, and that the time had come to hand the work over to some one else, sent in his resignation, which was accepted, with a vote thanking him for his faithful services lasting for so many years. Cer- tainly, much had been accomplished by him. The weekly celebration of the Holy Communion had been established. In the vesting of the choir and the use of the choral service the proper relations of the choir in the service of the Church had been recognized. The parish had purchased a better building for its work, though one by no means entirely suitable for the purpose, for its services could not be held there with anything like the dignity which should attend them. While the general standard of churchmanship had advanced, however, there was still much feeling that form was of no value as a means of education or expression ; nor were there in the city enough who sympathized with what is called the advanced school of churchmanship, even as it was known in those days, to come forward, and give freely to help such a work as the Parish of the Advent was attempting. The time was not yet ripe for that fuller development of teaching and ritual to which we are now accustomed.
Under all the circumstances, perhaps, it is well that no greater step had been taken. The parish had kept in a rather conservative position, showing but little growth, but holding its own, and gathering strength for its next step in advance.
1869-1888
A FTER the resignation of Dr. Bolles, arrangements were again made with the Rev. Mr. Stickney to serve as rector ad interim; and Judge Redfield, Mr. Dana, and Mr. Tarbell were appointed a committee to take into consid- eration the vacancy in the rectorship, and to make nomina- tions therefor.
At a meeting held October 7, 1870, Mr. Dana represented that the committee had no nomination to make; but he ex- plained the working of a brotherhood of clergymen exist- ing in England, and stated that the committee unanimously recommended the passage of the following vote: "That the committee to nominate a rector be authorized to make tem- porary arrangements with the Rev. Mr. Benson, of Oxford, to assist the rector ad interim in carrying on the work of the parish." The recommendation of this committee was adopted, and was the beginning of another controversy, which, while it did not directly or seriously affect the parish, caused it to be brought into critical notice.
The brotherhood in question, now so well known as the Society of St. John the Evangelist, had existed for about three years in England. It was composed at that time of priests, both Englishmen and Americans, who were not in- clined to take parish work, but were associated more espe- cially for the purpose of holding missions and of preaching wherever they might be called from time to time. The members of this order, however, favored a more advanced ritual than was the custom in this country, and were believed by those not well informed in the matter to hold a faith more nearly resembling that of the Roman Catholic than of the Anglican Church. Their very vow made them unpop- ular; and, as their habit was peculiar, they were objects of
59
60
THE PARISH OF THE ADVENT
much curiosity wherever they went. The fact that they were under the jurisdiction of the English Church also tended to make them objectionable to many of the Church- men of this city.
Satisfactory arrangements were made with Father Ben- son ; and he, with two associates, arrived here in November, 1870. They brought letters from the bishop of Oxford, the bishop of Winchester and the bishop of London, recom- mending them in terms of the highest praise, and entitling them to rank with the clergy of this country; but, notwith- standing all this, the bishop of Massachusetts declined to see them. The result was a correspondence which extended through the fall and winter of 1870-71, in which, while the parish was not technically involved, its committee was put to much embarrassment. These clergymen had been invited by the parish, and the parish felt in a measure re- sponsible for the manner in which they were received by the ecclesiastical authority of the diocese. Moreover, it felt the slight which the bishop put upon it in his treatment of its guests. Elsewhere in the country they were received with great cordiality, but not in Massachusetts.
It was finally arranged, however, that the Rev. Charles C. Grafton and the Rev. Oliver S. Prescott, members of the society, who, as priests of the American Church, were canon- ically eligible, should take active charge of the services of the parish, while the English members should hold such meetings in the Sunday-school-room and elsewhere as might be held by any laymen, performing no priestly acts in this diocese so long as the bishop objected.
The immediate result to the parish of the arrival of these men was a largely increased interest in its work. The sys- tem which the members of the society adopted was such as they had found eminently satisfactory in their work in England, and in some respects its very novelty was an attraction. Their sermons were mostly extemporaneous,
61
THE YEARS 1869-1888
and their directness of delivery gave the preachers a great influence. Their effectiveness was recognized by all. More- over, their influence was largely increased by the zealous personal interest which they took in those to whom they had come to minister.2
At the Easter meeting, April 10, 1871, the Rev. Mr. Stickney, for many years assistant to the rector, and later rector ad interim, resigned his connection with the parish. For nearly twenty years he had been a faithful and beloved minister to those in need, but his system of work did not readily coalesce with that of his associates. He was of the
23 [Three years later Fr. Grafton, then rector of the Church of the Advent, wrote in Parish Notes for the Year of Grace 1874: "We are Churchmen, but the party and controversial spirit is what we seek to avoid. While we have no other feeling than that of love towards all who call themselves Christians, we maintain that that alone need be held as necessary doctrine, which has in the Church of Christ, everywhere and at all times and by all, been held from the beginning. Our form of worship is that of the Book of Common Prayer. The manner of conducting our public service is less ornate and musical than that found in some churches in, our communion, and more so than in others. But this manner we regard as of little importance.
"Since the Convention of 1874, and in obedience to the Canon then passed, certain changes were made, and others at the request of our Diocesan. Our Church has wisely allowed a diversity of usages in her service. It is one of her greatest sources of blessing and a man- ifestation of her strength and real unity. But we are bound as loyal Churchmen not to overstep the limits she has prescribed. . .. Our sole object is to win souls to Christ. We must let nothing turn us aside from this one work. As a parish we felt it our duty to try and restore, in our age and country, the lost dignity of our services and the practice of Divine Worship. We have felt it, however, to be an unfortunate necessity ; unfortunate, if it obscured in the minds of any the prominent spiritual character of the Church movement in which we were engaged. Its chief feature has been the producing of a deeper repentance, a more thorough and earnest grappling with self and sin, a more thorough work of the Holy Spirit in the conversion of the whole man, and a real and more potent union with the Incarnate Son of God ... Its mark has been personal sanctity and self-sacrificing works of charity. What has been done by the saintly men, clergy and laity, whom God has raised up in England, we humbly hope, under Him, may, according to our degree of love and faith, be shown forth amongst ourselves."]
R
BISHOP GRAFTON
63
THE YEARS 1869-1888
old school, and they of a new; and a harmonious parting seemed preferable to a loss of influence on either side.
It was not until November 14, 1871, that the parish pro- ceeded to the election of a rector; and at that meeting the Rev. James DeKoven, D.D., was unanimously chosen. Noth- ing need be said at this time either in eulogy of Dr. DeKoven or to justify the parish in its choice. He was an obvious man for the position; but he felt that his duty was else- where, and he therefore declined the call. At the meeting at which Dr. DeKoven's declination was received the senior warden suggested the election of the Rev. Mr. Grafton as rector, and the Rev. Joseph Richey as assistant minister. This suggestion received careful consideration; and at a subsequent meeting a committee recommended the election of these candidates, after carefully considering the relations of all concerned. A letter was read from the Rev. Mr. Grafton, defining his position in regard to the Society of St. John the Evangelist, and he was thereupon elected rector, the Rev. Mr. Richey being elected assistant rector by a unanimous vote.
At the Easter meeting, held a month later, the wardens reported that they had notified the rector and assistant minister of their election; that the rector-elect had sig- nified his acceptance, but that Mr. Richey had been invited to the rectorship of Mt. Calvary Church, Baltimore, and felt that the call to Baltimore was a very urgent one, and should be accepted; therefore he declined his election.24
24 [April 1, 1872 the report of the wardens concluded as follows : "Mr. Grafton's election and acceptance have been communicated to the Bishop of the Diocese. So far has the Lord been with us and helped us. A great deal of work has been done during the last two years, interest and zeal have been aroused; and though difficulties and dis- turbances have not been wanting, we have great reason to be encour- aged. In a parish so large and so composed as ours, there must be differences of views and opinions, there may be earnestness and warmth in expressing them; but, let us each so maintain his own convictions, as to hold the truth in love, let us dismiss all jealousy,
64
THE PARISH OF THE ADVENT
Mr. Richey had been connected with the parish for some months, and he had especially endeared himself to the peo- ple. Moreover, as he was not a member of the order, his election seemed to many to tend to counteract its influence as such in the parish, and hence to be an important factor in the situation. To them as well as to those who had learned to appreciate his many virtues, his declination was a serious blow.
In the autumn of 1874 the matter of building a church was again agitated; and Messrs. Tarbell, Oliver, and Joy were appointed a committee to take the subject into con- sideration. They reported in favor of buying the site of the present church; but it was not until the Easter meeting of 1875 that a vote was passed accepting the terms of the owner of the land, and the purchase was completed later.
A building committee was immediately appointed, and John H. Sturgis, Esq., was unanimously chosen architect for the church.26 In the following February his plans were accepted; and in March, 1876, it was voted that the west bay of the church, according to Mr. Sturgis's plan, be com- menced at once, and the work prosecuted as fast as funds are furnished for the purpose. The building of the church, according to this plan, however, involved getting the consent of the adjoining property holders on the street, as it placed the tower outside of the established building line. This consent could not be obtained, however; and, therefore, the commencement of the building was again postponed.
In December, 1876, a proposition was made by Father
distrust, and fear, and let each do his part graciously as well as zeal- ously, in carrying forward the great work entrusted to us, recogniz- ing to Whom a solemn account must be given, of words as well as deeds."]
25 [The membership of this committee was as follows : The Rector, chairman; Messrs. Edward N. Perkins, Charles H. Joy, Dr. F. E. Oliver, and Erving Winslow, secretary. Mr. Robert Codman was added to the committee February 19, 1877.]
?
THE CHURCH OF THE ADVENT
66
THE PARISH OF THE ADVENT
Benson regarding the purchase of the building on Bow- doin Street; but the proposition was declined for the time. Negotiations, however, were still pending; and in March, 1877, the offer of Father Benson was accepted, on condi- tion, however, that "as long as the parish may have for its rector a member of the Society of St. John the Evangelist, the church on Brimmer Street shall be made the headquar- ters of the work of the society in Boston, and the church on Bowdoin Street shall be carried on as a mission chapel, sub- ject to the control of the said rector, but independent of said parish." It was also voted, at the same time, that "as soon as it is reasonably apparent that the sale of the church on Bowdoin Street will be completed the committee are authorized to contract for the piling for the proposed church on Brimmer Street, and, when the sale of the church on Bowdoin Street shall be completed, continue the work of building, provided that the committee shall at no time contract liabilities in excess of the means of payment ac- tually in hand, unless by special vote of the Corporation." The price fixed for the property on Bowdoin Street was about $27,000, which was raised by a contribution of £2,000 sent by Father Benson from England, and the remainder by Father Grafton and several members of the parish.
At the Easter meeting, 1878, sufficient money was in hand to warrant beginning the work; and the committee was au- thorized to drive all the piles necessary for the church. The ground was broken for the new undertaking March 21, 1878.26
When the piling was driven, the building of the chancel was begun immediately, its west end being bricked in so that services might be held therein. The chapel so formed was furnished with a temporary altar and organ and with chairs; and on Easter morning, 1879, the first service, an early celebration, was held, Dr. F. E. Oliver, who had done
26 [The Feast of St. Benedict ]
THE LADY CHAPEL
68
THE PARISH OF THE ADVENT
so much for the music of the parish in its early days, play- ing the organ for the "Gloria in Excelsis," the first hymn sung there.
At the Easter meeting, 1880, the Rev. Arthur C. A. Hall was elected to the office of assistant rector,-an office not canonically recognized, but provided for by the original con- stitution of the parish.
From this time on, for two years and more, the main ques- tion was how to finish the church building without going into debt. The question of mortgaging the property came up frequently, but it was not considered right to rely on a mortgage debt to furnish funds, when the absolute necessity for building was not apparent; and such a proposition was, during this period, always voted down. Finally, enough money appeared to be in hand to justify making the pre- liminary contracts ; and the building of the nave was begun in the spring of 1881. The furnishing of the church was also to be a matter of considerable expense; but through the kindness of friends, and gifts from many sources, many of them unexpected, funds were finally in hand to furnish the church fully and build an organ.
But the parish yet had to receive what seemed at the time its most severe blow. The several clergymen belong- ing to the Society of St. John the Evangelist, who had as- sisted the rector in carrying on the church work, were very intimately associated with the parishioners, and seemed to have made themselves almost necessary to all that the par- ish had undertaken. It was, therefore, with great astonish- ment that the parish received word, early in the fall of 1882, that the rector had severed his connection with the Society of St. John the Evangelist. This of necessity meant a thorough reorganization of the details of the parish work under new guidance.
The corporation, after looking into the matter, and real- izing that the church in Bowdoin Street was, by the terms
CHOIR LEAVING THE CHANCEL
70
THE PARISH OF THE ADVENT
of its sale, set aside for the ultimate use of the Society of St. John the Evangelist, and was being occupied by the parish, in a sense, on sufferance, promptly recognized the rector's right to choose his own assistants, and at the same time acknowledged the position of the society by agreeing to finish the new church as early as practicable, and then re- sign the Bowdoin Street church to the uses of the society under the immediate charge of the assistant rector, with the understanding that he should resign his office in the parish, and conduct the work entirely independent of the parish. This arrangement was agreed to on all sides as being, on the whole, the happiest solution of the difficulties in which the parish found itself; and on the Thursday before Palm Sunday, 1883,27 the parish held its first service in the com- pleted church,-completed at least so far as essentials were concerned. On the following Saturday the first services were conducted in the Church of St. John the Evangelist on Bowdoin Street. While the parish seemed to have received a serious blow, in fact there had arisen from the one parish two congregations, each independent of the other, and each by somewhat differing methods striving to do its duty in that position in which it had been placed by a Higher Power 28
27 [March 15, 1883]
28 ["In 1872 Rev. Charles C. Grafton was installed (as Rector of the Parish of the Advent), serving the Parish for sixteen years, the longest incumbency, and marked by the most important events and most critical conditions in its history. By his efforts the magnificent fabric in Brimmer Street was built, by his personal gift of $10,000, meeting the same amount from Oxford, the Bowdoin Street build- ing was secured to the Cowley Society after the removal. He brought here as his assistants men so important and devoted as Fr. Hall (now Bishop of Vermont) and Fr. Osborne, and as a 'missioner' Canon Knox-Little. ... The strain came when Fr. Grafton, whose desire to make an affiliated American order had been very strong, asked and obtained leave to withdraw from it. Fr. Hall was assistant minister, and remained a member of the English brotherhood. Those who still clung to it assumed that Fr. Grafton would resign his rectorship also, and the natural promotion of Fr. Hall would leave the parish still
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.