USA > Massachusetts > The story of western Massachusetts, Volume I > Part 22
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45
In some cases the location of dividends was decided by lot,-a drawing of numbers. Otherwise allotments were invariably made in the order of the location of the grantees on the town plot. So universal
W. Mass .- I-14
Bought by Benjamin Cooley Bought by Benjamin Cooley
John Dibble 10
66
210
WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS
was this custom that in the absence of other specification one may feel confident that this part of the proposal of May 7, 1645, was included in the final agreement of May 19th. Many later transactions show conclusively that this is the order in which the Long-Meadow grants were made.
The following entries in the records being the key pieces neces- sary for locating the earliest Longmeadow grants, they are here given verbatim :
"John Leonard is possessed of a planting lot in the Longmeadow eleven acres and half, more or less, in length 60 rods, lying on the outside of the Longmeadow fence, homeward."
"This eleven acres and one half is by John Leonard sold and fully passed away to Benjamin Cooley this 13th January, 1657/58."
"Benjamin Cooley is possessed by purchase from John Leonard of eleven acres and half of land in the Longmeadow lying on the outside of the fence northward. Breadth, 32 rods, length from the Great River eastward 60 rods, bounded south by Thomas Merrick."
"Thomas Merrick is possessed of a planting lot in the Long- meadow being 17 acres more or less, extending from the Great River eastward to the backer fence, bounded by John Leonard north, by James Bridgman south."
"This 17 acres is by Thomas Merrick sold and fully passed away to Benjamin Cooley this 2d day of February, 1658/59."
"Benjamin Cooley is possessed by purchase from Thomas Mer- rick of seventeen acres more or less extending in length from the Great River eastward to the backer fence, bounded by the eleven acres above said which Benjamin Cooley is possessed of by purchase from John Leonard."
"Also of fourteen acres next adjoining it on the south by pur- chase from Samuel Marshfield."
Thomas Merrick's deed in confirmation of a verbal sale made "many years since" is dated September 27, 1679 and describes the tract as being "a little below Ensigne Cooley's house and bounded on the north by the land which Ensigne Cooley is possessed of by pur- chase from John Leonard and on the south by land which was Samuel Marshfield's."
"James Bridgman is possessed of a lot of planting ground in the Longmeadow, fourteen acres more or less extending in length from the Great River to the back fence east, bounded north by Thomas Merrick, south by Joseph Parsons."
"This fourteen acres is passed away to Samuel Marshfield and by him passed away to Benjamin Cooley this 2d February, 1658/59."
May 17, 1656,-"There was granted to Benjamin Cooley ten acres of land adjoining unto the parcel of land formerly granted to John Leonard, adjoining to the hither end of said meadow, provided the said Benjamin do allow a cart way of four rod broad."
211
LONGMEADOW
"Benjamin Cooley is possessed by the grant of the plantation of ten acres of land more or less lying on this side of the Longmeadow adjoining to the land which Benjamin Cooley hath bought of John Leonard, which lies on the south side of this ten acres and it is bounded by John Lombard on the north of it. Length from the Great River. eastward to the brow of the hill, there being a suffi- cient highway through it."
September 10, 1656, - "There is granted to John Lombard the remainder of the land betwixt great hill and Benjamin Cooley's his lot above upperside, pro- vided he be no detriment to the highway."
"John Lombard is pos- sessed of a parcel of land at the hither end of the Long- meadow, about four or five acres, bounded by Benjamin Cooley south, north and west by the highway, east by the hill and the way, bringing it almost to a sharp point on the north. The grant is upon condition it prove no detri- ment to the highway so that the highway is reserved for- ever to be sufficient what ever the river may eat out." "This lot of four or five acres is fully passed away by David Lombard to Obadiah Cooley."
"Obadiah Cooley is by way of exchange with David . Lombard, land for land, pos- Cooley Brook, Longmeadow sessed of about four or five acres of land at the higher end of Longmeadow, bounded south by land that was Benjamin Cooley's, west and north by the highway and east by the hill, the highway to be allowed whatever the river may eat away."
Actual measurements determine that the Marshfield-Bridgman tract was well south of Cooley Brook and that Benjamin Cooley acquired all of the meadow by the River, from far below the brook up to the last triangular five acre bit, later secured by his son Obadiah.
212
WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS
As first laid out, the southerly course of Springfield's Town Street ended at "the way to the lower wharf", now York Street, the Town Brook and the swamps about it making further progress to the south impractical. Quite early, a foot bridge was provided across the Brook and the adjacent morass to give access to the corn-mill on Mill River. On March 9, 1642/43, "a bridge and highway to the mill, for the passage of carts and cattle" was ordered, necessitating the building of a corduroy road across the marsh and a bridge over the Mill River.
Three years later, to make the Long-Meadow section accessible to teams, on January 8, 1645/46, Thomas Merrick and Joseph Parsons were delegated to "make a way from the Mill River to the Long- meadow" where allotments had been made the year before. Evidently the project was greater than anticipated, possibly because of bridging Pecousic Brook, for on November 2, 1646, the supervisors were admon- ished to see that it was finished by the last of May, 1647.
The completed road, however, ended at the Longmeadow, and it was only gradually extended to Freshwater (now Enfield) as that section became settled, and a road became necessary. The town budget of January 30, 1650/51 included an item of "£10 to the cartway to the foot of the falls" at Warehouse Point, so as to avoid the bringing up of freight by water, over the rapids and shoals.
In 1664 this section of road was established as a part of the County Road from Hadley to Windsor, via "the lower end of Spring- field to Longmeadow Gate and from the lower end of said meadow into Freshwater River (Enfield) so called, and from thence to the dividing line between the colonies" which was then twenty rods south of the warehouse at Warehouse Point.
Just as the bridge to Brooklyn is the Brooklyn Bridge, so the bridge giving access to Longmeadow was known as the Longmeadow Bridge,-the bridge across the Pecousic.
Presumably, when, in 1647, Thomas Merrick and Joseph Parsons completed "the way from the Mill River to the Longmeadow", such a bridge was included, for on February 13, 1656/57, George Colton was granted "about a dozen acres of land by the Great River side about three quarters of a mile below Longmeadow bridge betwixt the brow of the hill where the cart way now goeth and the Great River."
It evidently was a rather primitive bridge of logs which was so ravaged by the turbulence of the brook as the snows melted in the spring that the bridge was later raised above the flood by stone abutments.
On February 11, 1660/61, for the "carrying on the work of Long Meadow bridge, the selectmen did conclude that George Colton and Rowland Thomas shall, as soon as the snow is off the ground, go down and see where the stones may be had easiest and whether they must cart them or fetch them by boat and Benjamin Cooley and Rowland Thomas shall see to the carrying on the work".
In many New England towns building construction was strongly influenced by an abundance of stone, but in Springfield it was equally
213
LONGMEADOW
influenced by an almost utter lack of it. The town proper, the meadows west of the Connecticut, the Long-Meadow were almost devoid of it. One exception was the red sandstone in the bed of Mill River and at Pecousic, where there was a limited supply of stone too soft to be of great value and difficult to procure. With crowbars, beetles and wedges this was laboriously worked out for what value it had. At Pecousic the ledges extended well into the Connecticut. The late Everett H. Barney, who was intimately acquainted with the locality, often repeated stories of old people whom he had known as a boy, who told him that in olden days, in times of drought, it was often possible to wade entirely across the Connecticut on such stones. On February 10, 1652/53 the selectmen gave to Rowland Thomas "liberty to carry away those stones he hath dug in Powscowsack River by the end of June next; no man to molest him in the meantime, but in case he leave any after that time, it shall be free for any man to take them". On February 12, 1660/61 Samuel Marshfield was granted land on the north bank of the Pecousic Brook at its mouth, provided that any person might "have liberty to fetch stones from the flats in the Great River". Poor as was the product, it was about the only nearby source of supply.
The valley of the Pecousic is quite extensive, draining a con- siderable area so that the turbulence of the stream in the spring necessitated frequent repairs to the bridge. On February 5, 1666/67 it was "concluded that Long Meadow bridge shall be made with stone on each side of the brook for the timber work to lie upon". On April 24, 1685 "it was voted to allow Obadiah Cooley, Samuel Bliss, Jr. and Nathaniel Bliss, three pounds to repair the Long Meadow bridge in the country road, they laying five new sleepers of good sound timber and planking them with half trees and pinning them down with cross pieces and putting up poles by the sides of said bridge". On March 13, 1693/94, "Longmeadow bridge being said to be very defective or to want a new one, this affair whether to repair the old bridge or to make a new one is left with Nathaniel Burt, Senr. together with the surveyors of the highways". At the same time "Increase Sikes, Samuel Bliss, 3d, Samuel Ely and Daniel Beamon did desire of the town the stream of Pecousic brook to set a saw mill on and the low land for ponding and they promise to free the town from all charge as to maintaining Pecousic bridge", and on April 11, 1694 their desire was granted. Thereafter the term Longmeadow bridge gradually gave way to Pecousic bridge.
This was the first use made of the power at that point but the use continued for some two hundred years. A saw-mill there is shown on the 1831 map of Longmeadow. In Civil War days James Warner had a pistol factory there. Until nearly the close of the last century, the brick buildings of the Havemeyer papier-mâché factory were a familiar sight.
A knowledge of the four Longmeadow brooks,-Cooley Brook, Wheelmeadow Brook, Longmeadow Brook and Raspberry Brook, is
214
WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS
vital to an understanding of events there. All were such insignificant streams that one might walk across the meadows with no realization of their existence until he suddenly came upon them. Having no precipitous banks, it is doubful if any of them except Raspberry Brook were even spanned by bridges in the early days, when no provision was required for the chaise or stage coach of a later era. A mere farmer could more easily drive his ox-team through the shallow water than he could provide logs for a bridge. All of the seventeenth century descriptions of the highway traversing the meadow are confined solely to references to the width of the road in the span between Longmeadow gate at the north and the southerly end of the meadow. Bridges over "gutters" were spoken of but none were mentioned that can be identified with these brooks. Surely some provision for the care of such bridges would have been included, had they existed. During the entire meadow period, Cooley Brook was not once mentioned in the records. Wheelmeadow was mentioned frequently but only once in connection with a brook.
Conditions were entirely different after removal to the hill in 1703, where the town street was intersected by the deep ravines of these water courses. They then became a noticeable and most annoy- ing feature of the landscape; something to be reckoned with four-fold on a journey across the town. Thus they became known by familiar names.
On December 10, 1700, Isaac Colton was granted "twenty acres at Rasbury Brooke". Prior to that the stream had been known as Longmeadow Brook, for on October 12, 1670 Samuel Ely was granted "six acres of high land below Long Meadow Brooke near the Great River". Such a tract could have been adjacent only to the present Raspberry Brook. This application is confirmed by the record of the establishment of the town of Enfield, May 16, 1683, the north bound of which was designated, as being at "the mouth of Long Meadow brook below Springfield", and that was most definitely the present Raspberry Brook. On February 5, 1683/84 Samuel Bliss, Jr., peti- tioned for "twenty acres of low land upon Long Meadow Brooke, beyond Barke hall, on both sides of the brook". It is patent that this reference could be to none other than what is today known as Rasp- berry Brook, or a closely adjacent confluent.
The 1831 manuscript map in the Massachusetts Archives explains this situation. Longmeadow Brook, coming down through the ravine south of Bark Hall Road, on approaching the meadow, originally took an oblique course southwesterly and joined the present Raspberry Brook, they becoming one brook designated as Longmeadow Brook. At the point where the brook met the meadow, at Bark Hall, it was later artificially diverted north along the foot of the hill and then westerly to the river. The Longmeadow Brook, in its present course across the meadow, is a man-made canal, the abandoned course being indicated by dotted lines, and so designated. Hence the necessity for a name for the remaining part of the brook at the south, which was christened Raspberry Brook and is still so known.
215
LONGMEADOW
It was the combined Longmeadow-Raspberry Brook, the most southerly of the four meadow brooks, that was referred to on Janu- ary 6, 1678/79, when there was granted to Jonathan Burt, Sr., "a piece of land lying over the country (i. e. public) bridge at the lower end of Longmeadow". Reference to this same bridge and Brook was implied when, on May 21, 1680, "it was voted, that whereas, the bridge over Longmeadow brook was carried away or spoiled by the late flood, that a new bridge should be built in the old place".
The last definite reference to the meadow portion of Longmeadow Brook in the town records was on February 5, 1683/84. The first recorded reference to the depleted southern boundry-brook as Rasp- berry Brook, was on December 10, 1700. Sometime between these two dates the alteration in the course of the brook must have been made.
Early and frequent mention is found in the records of the Long- meadow Gate, reference usually being to the gate at the north end of the meadow. Some entries indicate that this was just west of the Longmeadow Bridge at Pecousic Brook while others seem to place it in the vicinity of Cooley Brook. The situation defies satisfactory analysis, but the evidence is here presented for what value it may have.
The earliest reference is that of March 14, 1653/54, when it was "ordered that the proprietors of the field in the long meadow shall make a sufficient cart gate at the bridge over the long meadow brook". It is obvious that this refers to the gate at the southerly end of the meadow.
On August 27, 1660, "Thomas Gilbert hath liberty granted him for building and dwelling on his land which he hath bought of Ben- jamin Cooley at the Longmeadow Gate". Unfortunately this is value- less as there is no record of such a sale and therefore it is impossible to locate the traet.
On February 19, 1661/62, it was "ordered that the highway from the town bridge by Thomas Bancroft's to Goodman Cooley's lot at the higher end of the Long meadow shall be four rod in breadth. It is to turn to the right hand on this side the first bridge and so there is to be made a bridge over that gutter to make the way more straight and to save charge of repairing those bad places where the way has usually been. Also the highway from the long meadow gate to the lower end of the Long meadow is to be four rod in breadth from the gate till it turns from the river into the lots and thence to the bridge it is to be two rod in breadth".
At that date Cooley owned up to the last five acre bit at the north end of the Long-Meadow. The foregoing would seem to mean that from the bridge in town to the Cooley tract the road was to be four rods wide. From the Longmeadow Gate it went through the narrow pass and turned southerly from the river to the Cooley lots and so through the meadows to the bridge at Raspberry Brook. Through the meadows it was to be but two rods wide as hard land there was too scarce and valuable to allow of a greater width. All of which
216
WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS
would seem to place the Gate at a point east of the narrow pass and close to Pecousic Brook,-which reasoning is flatly contradicted by other evidence.
The road-layout from Hadley to Windsor in 1664 mentions the Longmeadow Gate. The record describes this portion of it as,-"from the lower end of Springfield to Long meadow gate, running where it now doth, in breadth four rods, and from the Long meadow gate to the bridge at the lower end of and by the river bank shall be in breadth two rods and from the lower end of the said Meadow into Fresh Water River, so called (Enfield) as the way now runs, four rods".
On January 11, 1668/69, provision was made for payment to "Ensigne Cooley for maintaining the water fence at long meadow gate".
On May 28, 1679, it was agreed that "Benjamin Cooley would and should make and maintain the gate and water fence at the upper end of the Longmeadow for ever. Also, he shall have liberty, if he see meet, to translate that gate and water fence and whole cross fence, to the lower side of his son, Eliakim Cooley's lot, provided it be no prejudice to the field".
There is nothing obscure about that. Twenty-five years earlier, on March 7, 1653/54, Benjamin Cooley and George Colton had been appointed to supervise "a fence at both ends of the long meadow, betwixt the top of the bank down into the river, for the securing of the said field". Cooley was now directed to build anew the fence across the highway at the upper end of the meadows, and extend it far enough into the deep water of the river so that cattle would not go around it. If he preferred to build it where the fence and gate had previously been, that would be perfectly satisfactory. If he found it more convenient and economical to transfer it to another point, that would be equally satisfactory, provided there was no inconvenience to the public.
Did he remove it from a point near Cooley Brook, to somewhere in the vicinity of Pecousic? Or vice versa? The records are silent on that point. But there is an equal lack of reference to a toll gate.
Longmeadow historians have contended that the Longmeadow Gate was at a bridge where the highway crossed Cooley Brook and that it was a toll gate for exacting a portion of the upkeep of the road from travelers between Hadley and Windsor. No evidence exists to support the latter contention. There is no reason for surrounding the Gate with the atmosphere of the entrance gate to a medieval walled city. Consideration of other gates about Springfield leaves one with the conclusion that the one at Longmeadow differed in no way from other purely farm gates, details of which are here assembled.
On April 23, 1669 it was ordered that "for securing the gate way or bars by the meeting house, Benjamin Munn, Serj. Stebbins, William Warriner and James Warriner are to take care and charge thereof".
217
LONGMEADOW
That same date it was agreed that "the gate at the higher wharf (now Cypress Street) being judged needful to be kept well hung and shut, that cattle may be kept from going to the river, it is ordered that all the neighbors from Deacon Chapin's upward shall take care of the said gate".
"And that something may be done at the lower wharf (now York Street) as to preventing cattle from pursuing the fields, either by making a gateway or otherwise. Anthony Dorchester is appointed to call the neighbors at the lower end of the town, to consider what may be advantageous."
Ka waiThy
UNION
Weather Cock of Longmeadow Church
Weather Cock of First Church, Springfield
As the Long-Meadow was adjacent and convenient to the dwellers at the southerly end of the town street, they participated in its dis- tribution. In a like manner "the cow pasture to the north of End Brook, lying northward from the town" became the property of the more northerly of the townsmen, and became known as the Plain Field, now crossed by Plainfield Street. For the protection of the Plain field a gate was earlier established at Round Hill. January 31, 1672/73 John Pynchon was "granted that little piece of land at the southeast end of Round Hill, provided a highway be left for passage to the Plain Gate". This gate remained well into the past century. Henry B. Rice (born 1821) in his latter years related, that as a youth he saw the fence and gate demolished for the opening of the new road, now North Main Street.
In 1673 Obadiah Cooley and David Lombard, who lived on oppo- site sides of the Way to the Lower Wharf (now York Street), had "liberty granted, for security of their own and the common fields to make a fence cross the highway to the lower wharf with a gate for passage through, who in consideration thereof, are to have the
218
WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS
privilege of the herbage of the said way to themselves, so long as they shall maintain such fence and gate to secure the fields".
One reference to a gate illustrates the diplomacy with which the Indian question of the day was handled. On February 12, 1667/68 "it was ordered that whoever shall leave open, and not shut that gate by Thomas Miller's when the field is closed, he shall pay to the use of the proprietors of land in that field, the sum of two shillings and six pence. Only, what Indians are culpable that way, they are to pay six pence a time, to the use of Thomas Miller, which he is to get of them, yet so that he make no trouble or disturbance in gaining it".
Mention of a fence implied a gate,-a gate where the fence inter- cepted a highway. Such a fence was, in 1658, north of Cooley Brook when John Leonard sold to Cooley his land there "lying outside the fence northward". Adjoining that tract on the south were the seven- teen acres and the fourteen acres Cooley bought of Merrick and Marshfield. These two latter tracts comprised the thirty-one acres listed in the Cooley estate inventory in 1684 as being "within the gate". Thus, in 1658 and in 1684, the fence and gate were in the vicinity and north of Cooley Brook and presumably were also there during the interim. If at any period they were at a point nearer to Pecousic Brook, that period must have been prior to 1658. Quite possibly it was so at an early date.
Apparently occupation of the Long-Meadow was delayed for a bit after the first grants were made, for not until November 3, 1646 was Thomas Cooper "appointed to measure out the meadow ground in the Long meadow".
September 23, 1645, as "divers inhabitants have allotments of planting ground in the long meadow and some of them have mani- fested their desire to break them up the next spring and defend it with a sufficient fence against cattle but others are not yet willing", certain regulations were made as to common fences.
By the spring of 1648 activities had been carried so far that, on March 1, 1647/48, George Colton and Thomas Merrick were chosen supervisors of fences for the district and, on April 7, 1649, provision was made for general fencing. On March 7, 1653/54 fences were ordered at both ends of the meadow.
It is impossible to determine just how early homes were built on the meadows, but certainly as early as 1649, as is shown by testimony in the Hugh Parsons hearing.
"February 27, 1650/51, Sarah, the wife of Alexander Edwards testified upon oath that about two years ago, more or less, Hugh Parsons, being then at the Long Meadow, came to her house to buy some milk".
On March 18, 1650/51 George Colton testified upon oath that Hugh Parsons came into the long meadow when his child lay at the point of death and having word of the death of it the next morning by Jonathan Burt, he was not affected with it, but he came after a light manner, rushing into my house and said, I hear my child is
219
LONGMEADOW
dead, but I will cut a pipe of tobacco first, before I go home. Hugh Parsons came to his house, he thinks, about eight o'clock in the morn- ing". Joshua Parsons, the child in question, died March 4, 1651.
The Colton House and the Edwards House were both in the vicinity of the present Longmeadow Brook. The latter was shortly after sold to Joseph Parsons and thereafter it changed hands fre- quently. There is quite a little presumptive evidence indicating that these were the first homes built in Longmeadow.
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.