Landmarks of Albany County, New York, Part 40

Author: Parker, Amasa Junius, 1843-1938, ed
Publication date: 1897
Publisher: Syracuse, N.Y. : D. Mason
Number of Pages: 1374


USA > New York > Albany County > Landmarks of Albany County, New York > Part 40


Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).


Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45 | Part 46 | Part 47 | Part 48 | Part 49 | Part 50 | Part 51 | Part 52 | Part 53 | Part 54 | Part 55 | Part 56 | Part 57 | Part 58 | Part 59 | Part 60 | Part 61 | Part 62 | Part 63 | Part 64 | Part 65 | Part 66 | Part 67 | Part 68 | Part 69 | Part 70 | Part 71 | Part 72 | Part 73 | Part 74 | Part 75 | Part 76 | Part 77 | Part 78 | Part 79 | Part 80 | Part 81 | Part 82 | Part 83 | Part 84 | Part 85 | Part 86 | Part 87 | Part 88 | Part 89 | Part 90 | Part 91 | Part 92 | Part 93 | Part 94 | Part 95 | Part 96 | Part 97 | Part 98 | Part 99 | Part 100 | Part 101 | Part 102 | Part 103 | Part 104 | Part 105 | Part 106 | Part 107 | Part 108 | Part 109 | Part 110 | Part 111 | Part 112 | Part 113 | Part 114 | Part 115 | Part 116 | Part 117 | Part 118 | Part 119 | Part 120 | Part 121 | Part 122 | Part 123 | Part 124 | Part 125 | Part 126 | Part 127 | Part 128 | Part 129 | Part 130 | Part 131 | Part 132 | Part 133 | Part 134 | Part 135


The lumber industry, which is both manufacturing and mercantile in character, has for many years been a prominent factor in the business interests of the city. The Swedish traveler, Kalm, noted the fact that


1


GEORGE I. AMSDELL.


1


379


vast quantities of white pine existed in this region in 1749, from which the early merchants and others sawed valuable lumber. The Patroon's early saw mills, on the creek that bears his name, have already been mentioned; they were in charge of Barent Pieterse Coeymans and Jan Gerritsen for a time, and in 1763 the former bought a large tract of land twelve miles south of the city, on which mills had already been built. In De Liancourt's notes of travel in 1795, he places timber and lumber first among the exports from Albany. In 1840 there were eighty-four saw mills in operation in Albany county; but the sale of local lumber soon became only a small part of the traffic of this city. In early years lumber was rafted and boated on the upper Hudson and the Mohawk from Northern and Central New York and here loaded on sloops and sent down the river. Two lumber yards were early estab- lished, one at the foot of South Ferry street and the other between Quackenbush street and Lumber street (now Livingston avenue). With the opening of the canals the business received a great impetus. Lum- ber was brought here in immense quantities and the wharves were used for its temporary storage. These soon became inadequate and slips were cut from the canal towards the river and the lumber piled along their banks. In the course of time the Lumber District, as it is termed, occupied about one and a half miles of river front and contained numerous slips running east and west. There were also erected large sawing and planing mills and other wood working establishments. In 1840 the receipts of lumber and timber were 124,173,383 feet of the former, and 784,310 of the latter, valued at over $2,000,000. This quantity was increased in 1850 to 425, 095, 436 feet of lumber and 3,039, - 588 of timber, valued at $6,806,213 The highest value in boards and scantling received was recorded in 1853, the figures being $6,299,617. In 1860 the valuation was a little more than $5,000,000. In 1870 the receipts of sawed lumber by canal were 415,000, 000. In 1880, 362, 000,- 000. After that time the quantity was considerably increased for a few years. The trade was at its height from 1880 to 1885, when about 500,000,000 were annually received by about thirty-five to forty firms. During that period by far the larger part of the receipts were from Michigan and Wisconsin, the receipts from Canada having gradually diminished. In the past ten years the business as a whole has fallen off largely, until at the present time there are less than twenty large dealers, handling from 200,000,000 to 250,000,000 feet annually. The decline is due to changes in business methods, under which mill owners


380


consign directly to market, driving out the middle men. Unfavorable discrimination in railroad freight rates, too, has had an unfavorable in- fluence against the business.


The Board of Lumber Dealers was organized in 1863 and was incor- porated in 1869. It has been instrumental in maintaining equitable business principles among dealers, disseminating valuable information and adjusting difficulties. It is entirely impracticable here to give a detailed account of the many companies and individuals who have been connected with this great industry in Albany. Among them have been Whitlock & Fassett, who began in 1832, and were succeeded by Will- iam N. Fassett; Douglas L. White & Co., Dalton & Kibbe, Moore & Zimmerman, W. H. Weaver & Co. (whose business was founded in 1862 by William McEchron, J. Ordway, James Morgan, A. M. Adsit and W. H. Weaver), Rathbun & Co. (established in 1845 by Joshua Rathbun), Rodney Vose (began in 1853), Maltbie & Simons (succeeded by Simons & Richards), Gratwick & Fryer, L. Thompson & Co .. Hughson & Co., Mattoon & Robinson, J. O. Towner & Co., Arnold & Co., J. Benedict & Son, William N. Callender, Truman D. Cameron. J. W. Dunham & Co., Charles P. Easton & Co., Fogg, Patton & Co., John H. Gordon, Hand & Babbitt, Hubbell & Hill, Harvey Hunter. John Krutz, W. C. Many & Co., T. Miles & Co., Morgan Lumber Company, Thomas Murphy, J. R. Nangle, Charles B. Nichols, Phil- lips & Dunscomb, H. W. Sage & Co., Saxe Bros., Robert Scott, Smith. Craig & Co., Henry Spawn, Staples & Van Allen, P. Van Rensselaer & Co., Van Santford & Eaton, C. Warren, David Whitney, jr., N. R. Wilbur & Son, C. H. Winne and Waine & Andrews.


The manufacture of agricultural machinery has been a considerable industry in Albany. The Wheeler & Melick Company was founded in 1830 and for many years were the leaders in this line of business, the value of their annual product reaching $500,000. The agricultural and machine works of Peter K. Dederick & Co. also carry on a large industry, manufacturing the Dederick patent hand and power presses, and many other kinds of apparatus for farmers' use.


The manufacture of pianos was begun in Albany in 1825 by James A. Gray. In 1837 he took as a partner William G. Boardman, the firm name being Boardman & Gray. The business was successful and from 1840 to 1860 the firm was among the leading piano manufacturers of the country. In 1877 William J. Gray, son of the founder of the busi- ness, became a member of the firm. Mr. Boardman died in 1881 and


381


the business was continued by the Grays. In 1853 Marshall & Traver, two practical workmen from the Boardman & Gray factory, began making pianos, and two years later were succeeded by Marshall & Wendell. In 1882 the firm, under the title of the Marshall & Wen- dell Manufacturing Co., was incorporated, with Henry Russell, presi- dent; J. V. Marshall, superintendent; Harvey Wendell, manager and treasurer, and John Loughren, secretary. This business is still in exist- ence, the present officers of the company being Jacob H. Ten Eyck, president; Thomas S. Willes, vice president; Edward M. Mckinney, manager and treasurer, and James L. Carpenter, secretary.


William McCammon was an early manufacturer of pianos in Albany and his instruments acquired considerable reputation. Upon his death in 1881 the business was continued by his son, Edward McCammon, who finally removed it to Oneonta a few years since.


While there are very many other branches of industry profitably pursued in this city, this brief glance at some of the more prominent of the past and present ones will suffice to show that as a manufactur- ing center Albany is not far behind other cities of its size.


WATER SUPPLY.


The first notice in the city records of a proposed water supply, other than wells, occurs under date of 1794. An advertisement was then published asking for proposals for supplying the city with water through an aqueduct from a spring "at the Five-Mile House on the road to Albany." No further notice of this matter appears in the re- cords. Two years later the Legislature passed an act to enable the corporation to establish a water supply, but this, too, failed of accom- plishment. In 1797 Benjamin Prescott received from Stephen Van Rensselaer a grant of the Maezlandt Kill, and he laid a line of wooden log conduits from the fountain head. For some unexplained reason the grant must have reverted to Van Rensselaer, who, a few years later, transferred all the rights on that stream to the water company. The Albany Water Works Company was incorporated in 1802 with a capital of $40,000. The first trustees were Stephen Lush, Philip Van Rensselaer, and John Tayler. The work of laying iron and wooden pipes through the principal streets was immediately commenced, and the Maezlandt Kill continued to be the source of supply until 1837, when that stream failed to meet the demands made upon it and the


382


Middle Brook was drawn upon. Within a few years both streams proved inadequate, and in 1845 a part of the Patroon's Creek was purchased by the company. Meanwhile in 1844 the capital of the company was increased to $80,000, and in the same year the Albany Hydrant Company was incorporated, with John Townsend, John K. Paige, Bradford R. Wood, James D. Wasson, Barnum Whipple, Rufus W. Peckham, and Peter Gansevoort, trustees. This company caused extensive investi- gation and surveys to be made for the purpose of providing a better water supply, but nothing further was done.


A long-existing sentiment among progressive citizens that it would be wise for the city to own its own water works culminated in the sub- mission of a bill to the Legislature by the corporation, which became a law April 9, 1850. This law empowered the council to appoint a board of five water commissioners, whose most important duty at that time was to make the necessary investigations and report upon the most feasible plan for establishing adequate water works for the city at a cost not exceeding $600,000. The first water commission comprised James Stevenson, Erastus Corning, John Townsend, John Tayler and Robert E. Temple. The commission entered at once upon their task and had examinations made of the Hudson River, Patroon's Creek, the Normans Kill and the lakes on the Helderbergs. Plans were finally devised and reported which met the approval of the council. On Au gust 23, 1850, all the sources of water supply owned by the old com- pany were purchased for $150,000, and most of the wooden pipes were superseded by iron, but the old method of obtaining water by gravita- tion was continued some years, the supply being the Maeztland Kill. with a further source which was adopted in 1851. This was provided by building a dam about six miles west of the city where three streams united to form the Patroon's Creek, thus creating a body of water since called Rensselaer Lake, covering full forty acres of land and holding about 200,000,000 gallons. From this lake an egg shaped brick con- duit four feet high and nearly four miles long, was built to Bleecker reservoir, with a capacity of 30,000,000 gallons. In the same year two other reservoirs were built a little east of West Albany, which took the names of Upper and Lower Tivoli Lakes, the upper one being for stor- age and the lower for distribution. These received their supply from water entering the creek east of Rensselaer Lake. From the lower lake a 24-inch main was laid to the intersection of North Pearl and Van Woert streets, where the water entered the distributing mains.


383


This was the system of water supply up to 1875, and included iron mains all through the city east of Bleecker reservoir.


Before the year last named, however, the demand upon the water supply was so great, owing to growth of the city, that several water famines occurred, and it was evident that something must be done for relief. The Hudson River was now brought forward and discussed as a proper source of supply, and thorough analyses and investigations were made to determine its purity. O. F. Chandler, Ph. D., made an analysis of the water in 1872 and said: " I have no hesitation in recommending it as a suitable and proper source of supply." This decision he supported in 1885, when asked by the water commissioners if anything had taken place since his first analysis to lead him to change his first opinion. The plans of the water commissioners for the adoption of the river as a source of supply were carried out in in 1875, the water being taken from beyond the pier, carried into a well chamber six feet in diam- eter and eighty feet deep through a copper wire screen of one hundred meshes to the inch, and thence through a culvert below low water mark. From this well chamber was extended a tunnel five feet in diameter and nearly nine hundred feet long under the basin to the pumping works, corner of Montgomery and Quackenbush streets, where engines were established which operated pumps to force the sup- ply into Bleecker reservoir. While this plan gave an abundant supply to the district east of Bleecker reservoir, there were more elevated parts of the city that received no benefit from the new arrangement. To improve the conditions another reservoir was built in 1878 on Pros- pect Hill with a capacity of 7,000,000 gallons, and into this water is pumped from the Bleecker reservoir. The use of water from the Hudson River continued to cause discussion for a number of years, many intel- ligent persons insisting that it could not possibly be wholesome. On November 17, 1884, the Common Conncil passed a resolution requesting from the water commissioners a detailed statement of their information concerning the possible sources of water supply for the city, and of their reasons for adopting the plan of pumping water from the Hudson. The board reported February 2, 1885, as follows:


This Board has no prejudice in favor of the river water, or against any other source of supply, and if it can be shown that a better source of supply exists, it will gladly take all practicable measures within its power to secure it.


The report adds that judging by experience and by the numerous


1


384


tests made, the river is the only practicable and attainable source of supply.


The water subject continued to be agitated and before long an addi- tional supply was needed to meet the increasing demand of the city. In accordance with a law of 1885, a special water commission was appointed consisting of Samuel Hand, president ; Albert Vander Veer, secretary; Archibald McClure and Owen Golden, "to make inquiry as to the available sources of supply of pure and wholesome water for the city, and if the present supply was decided to be the best available, wha: method could be adopted for purifying it. On November 30, 1885, this commission recommended to the council 1st, That the supply then obtained from Patroon's Creek and Sand Creek by the Tivoli Lake be gathered and transmitted to the Tivoli main, the cost of which would not exceed $230,000. 2d, " That a contract be-made for a new supply of 10,000,000 gallons daily, to be delivered at Quackenbush street pump- ing station, from the flats between the Troy road and the Hudson River north of the city, at or about in the locality of the well from which the water has been tested, to be furnished by the patent improved gang well system of William B. Andrews & Bro.," the cost of this improve- ment not to exceed $450,000.


The commission further recommended in the event of the council not approving of this plan, an alternative as follows: A new intake at a point in the Hudson River about 2,500 feet above the present intake, a new main from the pumping station to Bleecker reservoir, and addi- tional pumps, with extensive facilities for aeration and filtration, and the abandonment of Tivoli Lake, the estimated expense of all this being $750,000.


In their report to the council for 1886 the water commissioners again recommended the purchase of another and more powerful engine. At that time the consumption of water was exceeding the capacity of the pumps by more than twenty-five per cent. Although Tivoli Lake had been in one sense condemned, it was indispensable during 1886, as it was furnishing about one-fourth of the city supply. The report of the board for 1887 called for increased pumping capacity. On the 6th of January of this year Robert L. Banks, president of the Board of Water Commissioners, sent a communication to the water committee of the council, stating that the commissioners recommended such action by the council in its recommendations to the Legislature as would result in mutual action with the commissioners. That even if the driven well


385


project authorized by the law of 1885 should be successful, an unneces- sary provision in the law of 1884 restrained the commissioners from taking any progressive steps, after an engine had been contracted for and land purchased for the completion of the plant. The commission- ers' report for 1887 states that the engines already contracted for were completed and installed, but that the city was under fearful risks of water famine and destructive fire-a condition caused largely by the unnec- essary provisions of the law before alluded to. The two new engines of 5,000,000 capacity, contracted for under the previous law, were finished in 1888.


On March 16, 1891, a special water commission consisting of Dr. Albert Vander Veer, Hiram E. Sickels, Owen Golden and John G. Myers, report- ed the driven well project a failure, and that in anticipation of this con- tingency they had made investigation as to the possibility of adopting some other source of supply at reasonable cost. They reported that the feeling against the use of river water for drinking purposes had not abat- ed. One portion of the city, the eastern, where the supply was from the new reservoir, was comparatively free from typhoid and other diseases, which were then so prevalent as to amount to an epidemic in that part of the city south of Pearl street, which drew its supply from the river. This commission made careful examination of two sources of supply which alone seemed available; one, the streams and small lakes in Rensselaer county, east of the Hudson, and the other the Normanskill and its tributaries. On account of the great cost of adopting the first named source, the Normanskill was strongly recommended for adoption. The commission submitted an estimate of the cost of using this source, and further stated that the quality of the water compared favorably with that then being taken from the new reservoirs.


On December 28, 1891, the same commission submitted a report on the Normanskill, giving its flow, degree of purity, and suggesting meth- ods for using it, adding, that by measurements and examinations made, "we are the more firmly convinced that the Normanskill will furnish a city supply amply sufficient and of good quality, and that a resort to it is the best, the most practical, if not the only practical, solution of the problem, how to give the city of Albany a better supply of water. Various expert opinions were secured as to the excellence of this water late in that year and early in 1892; but on January 16, 1892, the water committee of the council reported to that body that the project recom-


49


386


mended by the special commission ought not to receive their sanction, and therefore reported adversely upon the project.


The Board of Water Commissioners appointed in May, 1892, report- ed to the council December 5, 1892, that one promising source of water supply had been overlooked, which was Kinderhook Creek, which has its source in a number of streams rising in the mountainous district along the boundary of Massachusetts and New York. The commissioners submitted plans for the adoption of this source and estimates indicat- ing that it could be made available for the sum of $1,600,000. The water was examined by experts and pronounced superior. On Decem- 18, 1893, Frederic P. Stearns, consulting engineer of Boston, reported to Hon. Elnathan Sweet, president of the water commissioners, that the Kinderhook Creek water was of excellent quality for all purposes. and that a supply from it would cost about $72,000 less annually than a supply from the Hudson, if properly filtered.


Two of the pumps, before alluded to, and ordered from Milwaukee are at the present time in use, and all other plans for a better water supply were abandoned up to the present year, 1897, when there is a bill before the legislature authorizing the city to expend $500,000 for an elaborate filtration system for the present supply. In 1896 a new building for the water works on Montgomery street was erected. Will- iam H. Weaver is now president of the board and George I. Bailey, superintendent.


FIRE DEPARTMENT.


Something has already been written of the fact that Albany made some effort towards protection from fire as early as 1694, through a body called Brant-masters, who used brantleere (fire ladders) and hooks. In December, 1706, the city had a primitive fire department, whose members were called "fyre-masters." In that year the records show that William Hogan, Anthony Coster, William Jacobse, Johs Claese. Jan Evertse, and Jacobus Schuyler were appointed to that position for one year; they were to examine chimneys, and " where they find chim- neys extraordinary foule, to fine ye owner in ye summe of three shil- lings." These fyre-masters were continued many years, and in 1726 cer- tain fines were imposed upon any person refusing to serve in that office. At a council meeting, November 24, 1730, it was ordered that "hooks and ladders be made with all speed and kept within convenient places within the city for avoiding the peril of fire."


-


ELNATHAN SWEET.


387


No engine was owned in the city until February, 1732, when steps were taken resulting in purchasing "the Richard Newsham engine, fifth size, with six feet suction pipe and forty feet leather hose pipe." This engine was soon received in the city with great rejoicing and con- stituted the only means of extinguishing fires for many years. The engine was kept in a shed on what is now the corner of Beaver and South Pearl streets. The second engine (probably) was purchased in England by Harmse Gansevoort in 1763, for $397.50, and in 1792 another engine was in use in the city which was a superior machine for that period. At that time the engine house was at the northwest corner of the old English church on State street. On January 26, 1801, the Hand Barrow company was organized with the following officers: Garrett Bogart, superintendent; John Cuyler, sub-superintendent.


The engine companies constituting the old fire department were or- ganized as follows: No. 1, January 5, 1801; No. 2, January 15, 1801; No. 4, July 1, 1805; No. 5, February 1, 1807; No. 6, June 25, 1810; No. 7, November 11, 1811; No. 8, December 13, 1813; No. 9, October 24, 1814; No. 10, March 13, 1815; No. 11, January 6, 1840; No. 12, May 22, 1843; No. 13, October 1, 1855; No. 15, April 16, 1866.


Hose Company No. 1 was organized, October 1, 1838; Engine No. 1 was reorganized into a hose company, November 13, 1854, known as Hose No. 2; Hose Company No. 3 was organized October 1, 1855; En- gine No. 4 was reorganized into Hose Company No. 4, November 13, 1854. On July 9, 1810, men were detailed from other companies to serve as Hook and Ladder Company No. 1. On April 13, 1813, Hook and Ladder Company No. 1 was regularly organized, and on January 28, 1813, Hook and Ladder Company No. 2 was organized.


March 6, 1843, the council passed a law regulating the duties of chief engineer and fixed his salary at $600 per annum. On the 27th of No- vember, 1848, a law was passed which entirely reorganized the depart- ment. It was also ordered that no wooden building should thereafter be erected in any part of Albany east of Lark street.


Hand engines only were used in the city until July 13, 1863, when the council authorized the purchase of a steam fire engine, to be locat- ed on Capitol Hill at the house of No, 4, the cost not to exceed $3,500. On the 4th of April, 1864, a company was organized for this engine, with thirty members, and J. C. Cuyler was made foreman, William Mix, jr., first assistant, William J. Shankland, second assistant, and Edward Leslie, clerk. During the fall of the same year two other steamers


388


were purchased, the Putnam and the Thomas Kearney. The effective service rendered by these engines soon produced a change in public sentiment, and in 1867, on the application of the council, the Legislature passed a law authorizing the council to reorganize the department to use steam engines, and to make appointments based upon merit by which certain tenure of office was assured the appointees, thereby in- suring effective service. The council's action was taken March 16. 1867, and the law was passed by a vote of 13 in the affirmative to + negative. On April 15, 1867, the council appointed the following com- missioners under the law: George Cuyler, Lansing Pruyn, Thomas Kearney, M. V. B. Winne, J. C. Cuyler, the last named being appointed secretary.


Section four of the law of 1867 conferred upon the commissioners the entire control and management of the department, and immedi- ately upon their appointment they took the necessary steps to initiate the work of reorganization. The old department consisted of eighteen companies, with a complement of between seven hundred and fifty and eight hundred men, three steamers, seven hand engines, six hose carriages and two hook and ladder trucks. It was in a demoralized condition, and utterly inadequate for the purposes of its organization. The introduction of steamers in 1864 tended to impair the efficiency of the hand service, and the hand engines were virtually retired. Al- though the membership of the department numbered upwards of eight hundred, the attendance at fires seldom exceeded two hundred. The spirit of the old volunteer system, in former times so thorough and effective, was broken, and while there were some few who were prompt in the discharge of their duties as firemen, the majority absented them- selves from fires. The law reorganizing the department reduced the number of companies to seven, and the entire working force to one hundred and fifty officers and men. It provided for five steamers and two hook and ladder trucks. There were but three steamers in the department and none of them was in perfect working order. To re- duce the force under the circumstances would have been unwise, and have left the property of the citizens unprotected. The commissioners. therefore, immediately ordered a steamer from the Amoskeag works. which was delivered in June, 1867. It was at once put in service, in charge of a new company, to be known as Steamer Company No. 4, and on the 1st day of July, 1867, several of the old organizations were relieved from duty. The steamer Putnam was subsequently removed to Arbor




Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.