USA > Kansas > A standard history of Kansas and Kansans, Volume II > Part 23
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45 | Part 46 | Part 47 | Part 48 | Part 49 | Part 50 | Part 51 | Part 52 | Part 53 | Part 54 | Part 55 | Part 56 | Part 57 | Part 58 | Part 59 | Part 60 | Part 61 | Part 62 | Part 63 | Part 64 | Part 65
Sec. 2. Upon every license granted to a dramshop keeper, and npon every lieense granted to a tavern keeper or groeery keeper, there shall be levied a tax of not less than one hundred dollars nor more than five hun- dred dollars for every period of twelve months; the amount of the tax to be determined by the tribunal granting the lieense; the said tax to be paid into the treasury of the county or eity granting such license. And it shall be the duty of the board of eonnty commissioners to appropriate all moneys received by such tribunal for lieense under this act, for the benefit of the township in which such lieense was granted ; and all incor- porated eities shall appropriate the moneys received by such cities for license under this aet, as the council thereof may provide.
Sec. 3. Any person, without taking out and having a license as
800
KANSAS AND KANSANS
grocer, dramshop keeper or tavern keeper, who shall, directly or indi- reetly, sell any spirituous, vinous or fermented or other intoxicating liquors, shall be fined in any sum not more than one hundred dollars for each offense ; and any person convicted of violating these provisions, shall, for every second or subsequent offense be indicted for a misdemeanor, and fined not less than five hundred dollars and imprisoned in the county jail not more than six months.
Sec. 4. Any person who shall keep open any porter, ale or beer house, grocery, dramshop or tippling house, or shall sell or retail any fermented, distilled or intoxicating liquors on the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday, the fourth of July, or upon any election day, shall, on conviction thereof, be adjudged guilty of a misdemeanor, and fined a sum not less than twenty-five dollars nor more than hundred dollars, or be imprisoned in the county jail not less than ten nor more [than] thirty days, or by both such fine and imprisonment. If such person is lieensed as a grocer, dramshop keeper or tavern keeper, he shall, in addition to the above provision, forfeit his license, and shall not again be allowed to obtain a license under the law for the period of two years next after conviction.
See. 5. Before any person shall be licensed as a dramshop keeper, or grocer, or tavern keeper under the provisions of this act, he shall execute to the tribunal granting such license a bond to the sum of two thousand dollars, with at least two securities, to be approved by said tribunal, conditioned that he will not keep a disorderly house; that he will not sell or permit to be sold any intoxicating liquors to any minor. without the consent of the guardian of such minor; that he will not keep his dramshop, tavern, or grocery open on Sundays, fourth of July, or any election day, nor will he sell or allow to be sold thereat, on Sunday, fourth of July, or any election day, directly or indirectly, any intoxi- eating liquors; and, upon said person being convicted of any of the offenses enumerated therein, suit may be brought against said principal and securities, to recover the amount of fine or fines adjudged against him on said conviction, in any court of competent jurisdiction.
See. 6. Every person who shall, directly or indirectly, knowingly sell, barter or give away any intoxieating liquor to any person who is in the habit of being intoxicated, after notice shall have been given him by the wife, child, parent, brother or sister of such person, or by any civil officer charged with the care and custody of the poor of the township, city or ward where he resides, that such person is in the habit of being intoxicated, or to any person in a state of intoxication, or to any minor without the consent of his parents or guardian, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction thereof shall be punished by fine not less than five nor more than one hundred dollars, or by imprisonment not less than ten nor more than sixty days, or by both such fine and imprisonment.
Sec. 7. All places where intoxicating liquors are sold, in violation of this aet, shall be taken, held and declared to be common nuisances ; and all rooms, taverns, eating houses, bazaars, restaurants, groceries, coffee houses, cellars or other places of public resort, where intoxicating liquors are sold in violation of this act, shall be shut up and abated as publie nuisances.
See. 8. It shall be unlawful for any person to get intoxicated; and every person found in a state of intoxication shall, upon conviction thereof, before any justice of the peace, be fined the sum of five dollars.
Sec. 9. Every person who shall, by sale, barter or gift of intoxi- cating liquors, eanse the intoxication of any other person, such person or persons shall be liable for and compelled to pay a reasonable compensa- tion to any person who may take charge of and provide for such intoxi-
801
KANSAS AND KANSANS
cated person, and five dollars per day in addition thereto for every day such intoxicated person shall be kept in consequence of such intoxication ; which sum may be recovered by a civil action before any court having jurisdiction.
Sec. 10. Every wife, child, parent, guardian, employer or other person, who shall be injured in person or property or means of support, by any intoxicated person, or in consequence of intoxication, habitual or otherwise, of any person, such wife, child, parent, guardian, employer or other person shall have a right of action in his or her own name against any person who shall, by selling, bartering or giving intoxicating liquors, have caused the intoxication of such person, for all damages actually sns- tained, as well as exemplary damages; and a married woman shall have the right to bring suits, proseente and control the same and the amount recovered, the same as if unmarried; and all damages recovered by a minor under this act shall be paid either to such minor or to his or her parents, guardian or next friend. as the court shall direct ; and all suits for damages, under this act, shall be by civil action in any of the courts of this state having jurisdiction thereof.
Sec. 11. The giving away of intoxicating liquors, or other shifts or device to evade the provisions of this act, shall be deemed and held to be an unlawful selling within the provisions of this act.
Sec. 12. For all the fines and costs assessed against any person or persons for any violation of this act, the real estate and personal prop- erty of such person and persons, of every kind, not exempt, shall be liable for the payment thereof, and such fines and costs shall be a lien upon such real estate until paid; and, in case any person or persons shall rent or lease any building or premises, and knowingly suffer the same to be used and occupied for the sale of intoxicating liquors, contrary to this act, such building and premises, so leased and occupied, shall be held liable for and may be sold to pay all fines and costs assessed against the person occupying such building or premises, for any violation of this act.
Sec. 13. In all prosecutions under this act, by indictment or other- wise, it shall not be necessary to state the kind of liquors sold, but shall be necessary to describe the place where sold; and for any violation of the third or fourth sections, it shall not be necessary to state the name of any person to whom sold; and, in all cases, the person or persons to whom intoxicating liquors shall be sold, in violation of this act, shall be competent as witnesses to prove such fact or any other tending thereto.
Sec. 14. All sales of intoxicating liquors, made by a keeper of a dramshop, on a credit, shall be void and of no effect, and the debt thereby attempted to be created shall not be recoverable at law.
Sec. 15. This act shall take effect and be in force from and after its publication in the statute book.
Approved, March 3, 1868.
INFLUENCE OF TEMPERANCE SOCIETIES
Until 1870 the temperance movement in Kansas had no real cohesion, but from that date to the time of the vote on the prohibitory amendment a continued and united effort was made to bring about a satisfactory change in the dramshop law. By 1870 temperance was a topic of nation- wide discussion. The church, always a vital power in the temperance movement, was holding revivals throughout the country. The Murphy or Blue Ribbon Workers were increasing in numbers. And all this was leading up to the "Woman's Crusade" inaugurated at Hillsboro, Ohio, Vol. 11-14
802
KANSAS AND KANSANS
in 1873, when after a temperance revival the women of the town under- took by a erusade of prayer to drive the saloons from their eity.
Prior to this time, probably the most potent factor in the temperance movement in Kansas had been the Independent Order of Good Templars, a national temperance society, organized at Utica, N. Y., in 1851, and an outgrowth of the Sons of Temperanee which had been organized some ten years previous. Article two of its constitution was the pledge that "No member shall make, buy, sell or use, as a beverage, any spiritous or malt liquors, wine or eider, and shall discountenanee the manufacture and sale thereof, in all proper ways." In 1858 Teeumseh had a flourish- ing lodge of Good Templars. Lawrence, too, was an early stronghold. On September 26, 1860, a Grand Lodge was organized at Leavenworth by delegates from ten subordinate lodges over the territory. At one time and another previous to the organization of the Grand Lodge there had been thirty-four subordinate lodges in Kansas.
The Grand Lodge proceedings of 1866 speak of an awakened interest in temperanee throughout the land. In New York a National Temper- anee Society had been organized issuing publications and sending out lecturers. And some discussion was evoked as to the propriety of making the Kansas Grand Lodge an auxiliary society to the National Temperance association that they might gain thereby the advantage of the "powerful advoeaey of its press and the infhienee flowing from its publishing house." For some years the Good Templars in Kansas had deprecated the lack of temperanee literature and were therefore anxious to scize opportunities that offered the publicity of the press, and gave them a channel for their propaganda.
In 1871 a member of the Good Templars brought to the Grand Lodge the suggestion that some aetion be taken to seeure an amendment to the laws on the suppression of the liquor traffic, "the laws, as they now stand, being praetieally a dead letter." He asked that petitions be cir- culated and presented to the Legislature at its next session praying for "a law which shall better suppress the sale of intoxieating drinks." The Good Templars had by this time inereased to 173 lodges in the state with a total membership of some 3,000 people, and had, of course, a corre- sponding influenee in public affairs ..
The effect of their work developed in the legislative session of 1872 when Dr. James II. Whitford of Garnett introdneed, on January 11. House bill No. 7. "An Act to provide against the evils resulting from the sale of intoxicating liquors in the State of Kansas." The temperance people were fortunate in seenring the ear of a man of Dr. Whitford's type. He understood legislative procedure, having served in the House of Representatives in 1870, and was a man of large and varied experi- enec. He was born in Cireleville, Ohio, in 1822, and as a boy helped his father in a wool-earding mill. After reaching manhood he was for a time engaged in the contraeting and construction of publie works in both Ohio and Virginia. In 1852 he went to California, where he mined gold for two years. Returning to his native state he began the study of medicine in 1856, attending Starling Medical College, and gradnated in
803
KANSAS AND KANSANS
1858. He practiced at Royalton, Ohio, until the beginning of the Civil War, and in August, 1861, was appointed assistant surgeon to the 30th Ohio Infantry, and commissioned surgeon in March, 1862, which posi- tion he filled until July 29, 1865. After the battle of Antietam he acted as Brigade surgeon, and after Chiekamauga as Medical Director of the Fourth Division, Fourteenth Army Corps. For some months he served as Medieal Director of the Wheeling district. After the close of the war he practiced at Cireleville for a short time, moving to Garnett, Kansas, in 1867, where he continued the practice of his profession.
Unfortunately no copy of House Bill No. 7, nor its substitute, has been preserved. We ean only judge it by its title, by newspaper notices, and by the antagonism created against it among the liquor- dealing element in the state. The bill was introduced, as has been noted early in the session, and on account of the opposition dragged a weary length through the House. Dr. Whitford had been made chairman of the special committee on bills relating to the sale of intoxieating liquors. With three others on this subject, House bill No. 7 was referred to his committee. On January 25, it was reported back to the House without amendment and with the recommendation that it pass. Later it was returned to the committee for further consideration and on Feb. 6, they reported a substitute to the House. A minority report was made on Feb. 8, and here follows :
MR. SPEAKER : The undersigned, a minority of your Committee to whom was referred all bills and petitions relating to the sale of intoxieat- ing drinks, unable to agree with the majority of said Committee in all the details of their report, beg leave to submit the following report :
By the provisions of the bill recommended by the Committee but one grade of license is to be granted, and that embraeing the sale of all kinds of distilled wines and fermented liquors, thus throwing the whole of the traffie in the milder beverages, sneh as wines and fermented liquors into the hands of the lieensed whisky shops; especially will this be the ease under the heavy license and bonds required to obtain a license. We think this poliey unwise, because many of our citizens, especially those of foreign birth, who are in the habit of using these milder beverages seldom or never indulge in the more hurtful and intoxieating liquors, and they would not desire to be obliged to go into and patronize the whisky saloon, in order to get a glass of wine or of beer. Instead of giving a monopoly of the sale of all these beverages to the whisky saloons virtually, prohibit- ing wine and beer houses, we would reverse the rule and authorize the selling of wines and fermented liquors manufactured within this State, on mild and equitable terms, holding, of course, the licensed party to a strict responsibility for any violation or abuse of his privilege, while we demanded of the dealer in distilled, drugged and adulterated liquors heavier license and severer penalties.
To accomplish this, the minority of your Committee recommended the following amendment as an addition to seetion one of the bill reported by the Committee :
Provided, That for the exclusive sale of wines and fermented liquors, manufactured within this State, the bond for license shall be in the sum of five hundred dollars, and conditioned that he will only sell wines and fermented liquors manufactured within this State, and
804
KANSAS AND KANSANS
Provided further, That the tax for said license shall not exceed two hundred dollars for any one year; and
Provided further, That nothing herein contained shall be construed to prevent the manufacture of wine and fermented liquors within the State from selling at wholesale in the usual way, without having obtained a license under the provisions of this act.
G. P. SMITH, E. SELLS.
From accounts drawn from several newspapers it appears that Section one of this bill provided that a bond of $3,000 must be given as security before a license could be obtained. Seetion two provided that it should be unlawful to sell to minors, to intoxicated persons or to those in the habit of getting intoxicated. Section four provided that every person who should by the sale of intoxicating liquor cause intoxication of any other persons should be liable for and should be compelled to pay a reasonable compensation for the care of such intoxicated person. Section five pro- vided for the right of action against the seller of intoxicants in the event of injury in person, property or support. The remaining sections defined fines and penalties for violation of the law and were not included in the account. On February 13th the bill came up for final consideration and passed the House by a vote of 57 yeas to 34 nays. On the 14th it was messaged to the Senate and there was referred to a special committee who eventually reported it back to the Senate with some amendments. It was re-committed for further consideration, and later, the Senate, in Com- mittee of the Whole, moved that the special committee be instructed to report as soon as the bill was printed. But since this motion was had only four days prior to the adjournment of the Legislature, and since no action was taken on it, it is but natural to believe that the bill died in the hands of the committee.
The petitions submitted to the Legislature asking for favorable action on this bill were surprisingly numerous and proved the activity of the Independent Order of Good Templars. Nearly fifty petitions were pre- sented to the House and some fifteen to the Senate. A conservative esti- mate of the number of signatures would place it at 6,000 names. Seven remonstrances against any change in the laws governing the liquor traffic were submitted, aggregating some 3,000 signatures.
The newspapers took an active part in this campaign, those of Leaven- worth and Atchison were naturally strongly opposed to any change in the liquor laws. The Leavenworth Times of January 28th had this to say :
The new liquor law is demanding the attention of the people of the state to a very large extent. It does not seem possible that the legisla- ture will seriously attempt to pass the proposed law.
If they do, it can never be enforced in this eity, and will only result in the abandonment of all laws for lieensing and restraining the traffic.
Iowa has a law similar to the one proposed in our State, and the result there is that anyone who ean buy a gallon of whisky becomes a retailer.
In Massachusetts prohibitory laws have proved failures, and the use
805
KANSAS AND KANSANS
of liquors have constantly increased since the law was passed. Good sense ought to govern, and we think will. If so, our legislature will let well enough alone, and we will move along smoothly.
The Atchison Weekly Champion of February 3rd had a long article on "The Liquor Law," from which the following is quoted :
Every year for at least ten years back, there have been members of the legislature who have insisted on tinkering away at the liquor laws. Occasionally they have made changes, and in one or two instances have submitted entirely new aets for the old acts. The legislature of this winter is, as usual, discussing the subject of the liquor law.
Then follows an argument on the impossibility of a law, unsustained by publie sentiment, becoming effective. The same argument that has been used since time immemorial against any legislation tending to raise the moral standard of a people. The article closes with this paragraph :
And hence we go back to the first principles of legislation and urge our legislators to remember that laws not sustained by the popular will are always, in this country, inoperative, inexpedient, impractical and useless. It is well to let well enough alone.
Many open letters were published in the papers both for and against the proposed liquor law, but the policy of the larger newspapers was undoubtedly against so stringent a measure, and inclined strongly to the "let well enough alone" theory.
That the liquor dealers took an active hand in the campaign is shown by the following newspaper extracts :
One day last week German circulars were distributed around town calling a meeting of the Germans for the evening.
The object was to effect an organization for the purpose of defeating any movement for changing the laws of the state in relation to the sale of liquor, and to meet and defeat temperance work in general.
A convention is called for the 30th of January, to meet at Topeka. This convention is styled "anti-temperance."
What are we coming to is a problem worthy the serious attention of all who have the welfare of the community at heart. That the labors of the friends of temperance and sobriety, and of implanting principles of industry and morality in the characters of the youth of our land, have a work to do, the magnitude of which is daily increasing, should be recog- mized as a startling reality. Topeka State Record, Jan. 24, 1872.
From the Leavenworth Times we find that the "Anti-Liquor Law Con- vention came off according to plans, and that its meeting was considered successful. There were present 119 delegates from over the state, resolu- tions were passed, and the convention adjourned subject to call. The resolutions were to the effect that all restrictions necessary were already imposed by the dramshop act of 1868. They recited that the liquor dealers were among the heaviest tax payers in the state. That they were a most respectable body of business men "desirous of obeying every just law, and the legislation on so personal an affair as what a man should eat and drink was contrary to the constitution of the United States and all
806
KANSAS AND KANSANS
liberty." They further stated that experience had proven such stringent laws ineffectual and that the convention should "heartily unite against the movement now on foot to crush our social liberties by fanatics. And that further trust be refused any party that upholds the principles enun- ciated in the temperance law now before the legislature." Copies of these resolutions were sent to the Speaker of the House and to the Presi- dent of the Senate to be presented to the Legislature as a protest against the law.
A resolution looking to a permanent organization of the liquor dealers was also passed.
The activity of the temperance people, and they were exceedingly busy during the legislative session, is shown through the many announce- ments of temperance meetings and in fact that the State Temperance Union held its annual meeting in Topeka while the Legislature was in session. An urgent invitation was extended to the Legislature to attend the sessions of the Temperance Union.
How this invitation was received is illustrated by an extract from the Leavenworth Times of January 18.
Yesterday a letter was sent to a prominent brewer of Leavenworth, stating that if he wanted to defeat the bill regulating the sale of intoxi- cating liquors, he would have to send up some beer, and this afternoon (Jan. 16), when the legislature received an invitation to attend a session of the State Temperanee Convention, the announcement was also received that five kegs of beer had arrived from Leavenworth. So much for a practical joke.
On motion of Gen. Strickler the representatives of the Times, Commer- cial and Call were included in the invitation to the Temperance Conven- tion, and the anti-Temperance men, not to be thwarted by anything of this kind, included the reporters in the invitation to the beer banquet. The Congressional aspirants, who were obliged to attend both "blow- outs" were somewhat exhausted and hope to have more harmony among their constituents hereafter.
Of a meeting on the evening of February 5th the newspaper says that the temperance men rallied in force at representative hall. "Not only were the cold-water men there but the cold-water girls as well. On a whole it was a temperance victory, and an ice-water ovation. Speeches were made, all for the bill." That the bill was already lost was a fore- gone conclusion, and probably none knew it better than the "cold water men," but public sentiment was being educated.
THE REPUBLICAN PARTY RECOGNIZES TEMPERANCE
In 1873 prohibition began to be talked of in Kansas but not hopefully. The Legislature of that year was inclined to leave temperance legislation alone. A bill was introduced in the House to amend the dram-shop law of 1868 but was reported adversely by the committee to which it was referred. By the next year temperance was once more to the fore. The "'Women's Crusade" had reached the state and in several towns women went into saloons, praying with the saloon keepers and the patrons. In
ยท
807
KANSAS AND KANSANS
some instances they had even engaged in "liquor spilling." From the stories of that crusade, that have been handed down, it is hard to decide which the men felt the most keenly having the women pray with them or having them empty the whiskey bottles and barrels. One was an annoy- ance and a humiliation, the other angered them! Certain it is that many fairly reputable citizens and politicians were prayed over by the women of the towns in which they lived, and it is a matter of history that more than one wife was forbidden to "go out with the praying women."
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.