USA > New York > Ecclesiastical records, state of New York, Volume V > Part 28
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45 | Part 46 | Part 47 | Part 48 | Part 49 | Part 50 | Part 51 | Part 52 | Part 53 | Part 54 | Part 55 | Part 56 | Part 57 | Part 58 | Part 59 | Part 60 | Part 61 | Part 62 | Part 63 | Part 64 | Part 65 | Part 66 | Part 67 | Part 68 | Part 69 | Part 70 | Part 71 | Part 72 | Part 73 | Part 74 | Part 75 | Part 76 | Part 77 | Part 78 | Part 79 | Part 80 | Part 81 | Part 82 | Part 83 | Part 84 | Part 85 | Part 86 | Part 87
-The Independent Reflector, pp. 21, 22, 23.
ACTS OF THE CLASSIS OF AMSTERDAM.
Examination and ordination of Rev. Appeldoorn and Rev. John Schuneman.
1753, Jan. 9th. Art. 10. The Deputati Synodi gave their reasons for being excused for absence from the examination of Rev. Appeldoorn .- (when he preached his sermon) on Rom. 8:34. Thereupon Appeldoorn was admitted to the final examination. Rev. John Schuneman-see Acta of December 5, 1752, Art. 2 .- preached a sermon on John 3: 36, " He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life; and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him ", and was admitted to the preparatory and final examination.
Both gave so much satisfaction that the Assembly not only admitted them to the preaching of the Gospel, but also ordained them to the public ministry in their respective churches to which they had been called. They signed the usual Formulae, and Rev. Schuneman also particularly promised to join himself to the Coetus of New York. At the next Classis Rev. van den Broek, minister at Ouwerkerk, must preside ex ordine. xii. 316.
Letter to St. John.
1753, Jan. 9th. Art. 9. A letter to be sent to Rev. Knevels, minister at St. John, (West Indies), was approved. The Acta of the Synod (of North Holland) for last year (1752) were also to be sent, and to be forwarded to their proper destination. xii. 321.
ACTS OF THE CLASSIS OF AMSTERDAM.
Revs. Frielinghuysen and Hoevenberg.
1753, Jan. 12th. § 11. The Rev. Depp. read two letters, one from Rev. Hoevenberg and the Consistory of Claverack dated
3334
ECCLESIASTICAL RECORDS
1753
Feb. 26, 1752; and one from three elders at Claverack, dated Feb. 24, 1752. Furthermore the said gentlemen read answers to the letters of Rev. Frielinghuysen ; to the church at Lower Rhinebeck on the Plain; and to the elders at Claverack. These three answers were approved, and shall be forwarded. xii. 315.
CHURCH OF NEW YORK.
Requests of Domine De Ronde. Answer.
New York, Jan. 25, 1753.
Consistory held, after calling on God's name. Domine De Ronde presented a paper, the contents of which are as follows:
1. Rev. Sirs and Brethren: It is now nearly two years and a half since I accepted the call to be the minister of this church, perceiving the great inclination of the congregation toward me and my work. This I did, without making any conditions, as I was advised not to suggest any. I freely engaged to do all that stands within the call, not doubting but that the affection of the congregation, and the esteem borne to me by most of the Consistory, would in due time be shown by actual proofs, and by such recompense as was fitting and proper; viz., that I should receive a douceur for services rendered here at first, when I was weak and sickly, and also my traveling expenses as has always been customary.
But after being here as minister for two years and a half, and having mentioned and explained the reasonableness of this thing to former assemblies and to indi- vidual members of the Consistory, I yet perceive that nothing comes of it. The matter is suffered to rest, and no presentation of it is made anywhere. Therefore, I am obliged after long waiting and well-tried patience, to turn at last to you and ask you to take the matter into your consideration. You enjoyed my services with- out paying even my traveling expenses from Surinam. I came here at my own cost, and after a three-months stay, passed over to you, renouncing my call to Surinam, and thus losing my claim on them. These costs, amounting to seventy-five pounds, should be repaid me; especially, because, in addition, I had immediately to hire a house at my own cost. Thus I lost a good sum, to the great injury of my family, while yet in the service of the New York congregation. I, therefore, really think that they are under obligations to me in justice, as could be further proved, if it were required.
2. I requested a former Consistory, on Nov. 18, 1751, to provide me a suitable dwelling even as the other ministers. I must complain that in this matter nothing has been done. A committee was appointed, indeed, to look after a house some- where, but they did not have authority to rent such a one as the other ministers had, but only such as could be got for thirty pounds. And although that is not much in these times, it was good enough for me. Perceiving this, I used my own eyes till I found the house I now live in, and asked for it, but was refused. This refusal was not by the Consistory, but by some of the elders, and only thirty-six pounds were contributed for a house. Thereupon, I said I must seek aid from the congregation. This was acquiesced in until I prepared a proposal to obtain the rent by subscription. But an elder soon requested that that plan be stopped, and, there- fore, thus far, I do not know how it will succeed. The time is at hand for payment, and the lease must be renewed, or the house given up.
3. It now becomes necessary to request you to provide for my dwelling, and not to regard me less than my colleagues in this matter; but in these hard times to go beyond the thirty pounds and pay the additional amount required for my house, namely, twenty pounds and the taxes, two pounds and ten shillings; and hence- forth to care for me in the same manner as for my associates. Thus doing, you will bind me to the further faithful discharge of my office, and give me no reason to perform it with grief, but with satisfaction. This will be the case, if at the first opportunity you compensate me and my service by a proper salary. For how other- wise can a minister live in these hard times, who is responsible for the important
S
S
3335
OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
1753
service entrusted to him? How can he care for his wife and children, as natural reason obligates him to do? Yea, how can he meekly and tenderly execute such an important function as his if he must make himself entirely insensible to his family's welfare? so that men must regard him as either more than human, or else as alto- gether inhuman. How can he perform his duties, when he remembers that with his death his salary ends? and then, his wife, now during his life so dear to him, and his children also must become sad and miserable? Unless, indeed, God, by his providence, makes some special provision for them, especially in such times as these, when beneficence is so seldom practiced by the majority of men.
Brethren, is not this so? My heart has often been pierced, and my eyes have streamed with tears, when I consider my condition, and how I have been hindered in my office, as I doubt not has also been the case with my associates. What, there- fore, I ask, is more appropriate, than an increase of salary in these times? Thus might we be unincumbered in our work, and have what reason and scripture demand from a Christian congregation. See 1 Cor. 9:7-14, compared with Gal. 6:6.
But if you cannot help, Rev. Brethren, if you cannot spare this for me, or the congregation does not care about it, then I shall be constrained, however much inclined to exercise my ministry here, to lay down my office among you, and serve God's Church elsewhere; for there is no obligation on a minister to serve in the Gospel without an adequate compensation, or to be wronged in what equitably belongs to him, and, to the injury of his wife and children, minister to a people who have no more esteem or practical regard for him.
Be pleased to take both these things into consideration. Therein, I wish you all wisdom, that you may do all things for the benefit and profit of God's Church. I remain with all esteem,
Rev. Sirs and Brethren, Your servant and brother in Christ,
Lambertus De Ronde.
Answer.
New York, Jan. 25, 1753.
This was immediately taken into consideration by the Consistory. It was decided concerning the First Article, that it was not a matter belonging to them, inasmuch as it was attended to in domine De Ronde's call.
As to the Second Article, the Consistory agrees to pay the full rent of his dwelling for the current year, amounting to fifty-two pounds ten shillings, although not satisfied with his Rev's. mode of renting. For the following year, forty pounds will be allowed.
The Third Article is delayed for further consideration.
The Consistory further Resolved, to give to domine Ritzema twenty-five pounds to make up the amount which he received in the first years of his ministry less than his colleagues; provided that he make no further claims. This was agreed to by his Rev.
Actum ut supra. Signed in the name, etc.
J. Ritzema.
CHURCH OF NEW YORK.
Reply of De Ronde to Consistory's Answer.
New York, Feb. 1, 1753.
Consistory held, after calling on God's name.
Domine Lambertus De Ronde presented the following reply to the Resolution of the Consistory, passed Jan. 25.
On Article 1. I had thought that the Consistory would have been of a different mind concerning this, but I perceive they are not. I think this due me, according to my call; but the reason I laid it before you was to obtain from you my traveling expenses from Surinam. But since you resolve not to pay them, I will not debate the matter, but only ask, if some suitable means cannot be devised to accomplish this end, apart from the treasury of the Church. I thus leave it to your consideration. On Article 2. I am satisfied with the action of the Consistory.
On Article 3. I hope that the Consistory as soon as may be, will increase our salaries, and so rest with my colleagues.
1753 3336
ECCLESIASTICAL RECORDS
The Consistory, having considered the foregoing, determined in reference to the first point, that if it could be effected, without burdening the Church Treasury, they had no objection.
The second point is ended.
The third will be attended to as soon as they find themselves able.
J. Ritzema, p. t. President.
CORRESPONDENCE IN AMERICA.
Jan Hegeman and Minne Schenck, (a faction of the church of Success), to the student, Thomas Romeyn, February 3, 1753.
Portfolio "New York ", Vol. ii.
To the Student,
Mr. Thomas Romeyn.
Mynheer: Each of us, the undersigned, representing the consistories of the church of Queens, named below, have understood that your Rev. has, under the direction of Mr. Johannes Frelinghuysen, accepted a call to Oyster Bay and, in part, Jamaica; and, as we are informed, including even the undersigned church. This matter looks very strange to us; for we have understood that the Coetus sent Rev. de Ronde to Oyster Bay; and, by general consent, he was chosen, and not Johannes Frieling- huysen, to transact church business among us in Queens. Therefore we ask you, most kindly, not to persevere in the above-mentioned arrangements, for we think it will tend more to confusion than to peace. In case you should persevere in this matter (of your call), we shall feel ourselves bound to oppose you therein.
Minne Schenck Jan Hegeman.
At Queens-otherwise called Hempstead-(Success or North Hempstead.) February 3, 1753.
CLASSIS OF AMSTERDAM. Acts of the Deputies, March 8, 1753. (Abstract. )
Letter from Rev. Haaghoort, of Second River, (Belleville), December 10, 1752, with enclosures concerning Rev. Muzelius at Tappan. Received, March 8, 1753.
I. The letter itself.
By this opportunity, because he is charged with forwarding the enclosures, he informs us of his surprise that he has received no answer from us, to his Protest against the Coetus, nor to his previous letter to us.
He mentions the fact, also, that the Coetus has ordained and installed (gepro- moveert) Rev. Marinus, as minister at Aquackenonk, (a place formerly united with Second River, (Belleville) belonging to the Coetus, and subordinate to the Classis). This they have done in behalf of Rev. Schlatter of Pennsylvania, who has been employed thus to act by the Synods of South and North Holland; but he (Haaghoort) cannot harmonize this, (with other Acts). The Classis refuses this power, and with reason; the Synods, to whom they (the parties) are not known, neither are directly subject, grant it; and that to a person who has not the least relation with them, a Swiss, formerly sent by the Synods to the German churches in Pennsylvania. He (Schlatter) has himself undertaken, on his own authority, to examine Marinus, and give him a license to preach; in particular, at Acquackenonck. Can such things, asks he (Haaghoort), succeed, without the cognizance of this Classis? If so, why was it not prevented? If not, the same way is opened for them. He thinks the mistake lies in the fact that the Synods suppose that Acquackenonck is situated in Pennsylvania. But then the blame rests on Rev. Schlatter, and the Classis, who
1753
3337
OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
know better. Or can it be, that Synod has no knowledge of the existence of a Coetus? For Rev. (Gualterus) Du Bois is the only one written to about Pennsyl- vania affairs, and the Coetus is passed by, notwithstanding so many agitations by Schlatter. He wishes to lay this matter before the Synod more fully. Now he only writes thus briefly in haste, to prevent dispute and schism, and to see whether some means could not be devised to bring everything to rights? (alles te regt te brengen ?)
The German churches in New York are inclined to unite themselves with the English Presbyterian-Independents. They have a Synod there, and also one in Philadelphia. (This they may do) in order to get their ordination (promotite) in that way, in this land; for they are displeased at the refusal of the Classis, (to allow ordinations here) and object to the cost and trouble of sending their students across (the ocean); and they are strengthened therein by the address of the Synods and the Philadelphia Coetus. Thus there is danger that they may separate them- selves and fall away from the Holland National Church, and themselves become independent; and thus much further down in the scale than that strange (or foreign) German Coetus. Nevertheless, the Synods judge that it might be recognized as a Classis. There are beginnings of this already, as it was attempted in the case of Acquackenonk. He further remarks, that if that union should occur, as he fears, it would be better that the Presbyterians should unite with them, (the Dutch) as they (the Presbyterians) have no Liturgies or Forms. He ends with salutation.
II. The enclosures refer to Rev. Muzelius, Emeritus Pastor at Tappan.
1. A letter signed at Tappan at the house of Isaac Blaauwenvelt, December 6, 1752, by Revs. Haaghoort, Goetschius and Verbryck, V. D. M. They suppose it is already known to us that Rev. Muzelius, (by) direction of the Coetus, was declared Emeritus on February 21, 1750. This was done probably for his preservation; for, on account of his reckless conduct, serious accusations were brought in against him at the last two meetings of the Coetus as appears from the Acta of Coetus of Septem- ber 10, 1751, and of April 14, 1752, Session VI. § 3, which was communicated to him in writing expressly; and if this should have no good result, the consistory was then to refer the case to three neighboring ministers with their elders, to take action against Muzelius even to the extent of censure, and to make report of this to Coetus, that it might be determined whether the affair should have to proceed to a deposition. In accordance with this resolution of Coetus they spent (lit., lost, gevaceert) two days in the investigation of those matters. They found that Muzelius, since he was made Emeritus, had returned again to his previous drunkenness and irreligious conduct; that he also causes great dissensions; he threatens the congregation with total ruin, with his preaching and baptizing children in private houses in the face of all friendly admonitions of consistory and Coetus. Within two years he has but twice attended public worship, although he was urged to diligent attendance by Coetus. He treats the members of consistory and the ministers with affronts. He did great damage to the congregation's house and barn before he left, by burning and break- ing down the fences, etc. The committee invited him in a friendly way to attend their meeting and bring in his complaints; and to reply to the complaint and accu- sations brought against him; but he sent back the mesenger with a scoffing retort and refused to have any dealings with the committee or Coetus. Also by aid of his brothers-in-law, who belong to the consistory (or Church?) of England, (die aan den kerkenraad van Engelant behoren,) he caused the elders who were in office three years ago, to be summoned before the Civil Court (or Judge). All these things are established by eye and ear witnesses. The schisms, scandals and disturbances in the congregation are excessive; yea, so extreme, that two elders elect, out of fear, refuse to assume office; and many threaten to leave the church. A speedy remedy is therefore necessary, to prevent the entire ruin of the church. They transmit to us their verdict in writing, which they also made known to Muzelius.
They hope and expect that we will take compassion on the sad condition of the churches in those regions, where so many schisms are caused by intruders; that despoilers of the flock may be punished as circumstances may demand. They request a speedy answer hereto. They conclude with salutation.
3338
ECCLESIASTICAL RECORDS
1753
The second enclosure is this: Tappan, December 6, 1752, at the house of Isaac Blaauwvelt.
The meeting having weighed everything carefully in the fear of the Lord, unani- mously resolved :
1. That Frederic Muzelius be no longer recognized as an Emeritus Minister, but be declared unworthy of such title.
2. That if Muzelius does not submit to this decision, does not desist from further stirring up dissensions in the churches by his preaching and baptizing in private houses or elsewhere, and from his offensive conduct, that the consistory of Tappan punish him as an unworthy member of the church, with ecclesiastical excommuni- cation, according to Church Order.
3. That the consistory fraternally exhort the disobedient members, and others to return to the church; and in case of obstinacy, that the consistory act in regard to their members, according to the church discipline.
4. That Muzelius, by his exciting schism and ill-behavior, during the period of his Emeritus-Pastorship, and has thereby hindered the voluntary support of the con- gregation, nevertheless, he is commended to the benevolence of the congregation.
5. As to the third quarterly payment; it came to be known that the consistory had not paid Muzelius the full stipulated salary in accordance with the purpose and the direction of Coetus. It was therefore resolved to refer this matter to the Coetus as it has appeared to us; (and) it is resolved, at the first opportunity, to make this matter known to the Classis of Amsterdam, and to make report thereof to the Rev. Coetus.
Signed, Gerhardus Haaghoort, President; J. H. Goetschius, V. D. M .; Benjamin Van der Linden, V. D. M .; Albertus ter Huyn, elder at Paramus; Simon Demarest, elder at Schralenberg.
xxiii. 299-305.
THE CHURCH AND THE COLLEGE.
Remarks on the Intended College in New York. Shall it be Sec- tarian or Unsectarian ? By William Livingston, March 22, 1753. (See Nov. 25, 1751.)
(Extracts.)
The Design of erecting a College in this Province, is a Matter of such grand and general Importance, that I have frequently made it the topic of my serious Medita- tion. Nor can I better employ my Time than by devoting a Course of Papers to so interesting a Subject. A Subject of universal Concernment, and in a peculiar Manner involving in it, the Happiness and Well-being of our Posterity!
That the College ought to be placed in or near this City, appears evident from numberless Arguments, that naturally occur to the most superficial Thinker. But while we have been amusing ourselves with Disputations concerning the Situation of the Building, we have been strangely indolent about its Constitution and Govern- ment, in Comparison of which, the other is a Trifle that scarce deserves Attention.
That the College ought therefore to be situated near our Metropolis, and that it will be productive, if properly regulated, of unspeakable Benefit to this province, I shall lay down as two postulata not to be questioned.
The true use of Education, is to qualify Men for the different Employments of Life, to which it may please God to call them.
The Consequences of a liberal Education will soon be visible throughout the whole. Province. They will appear on the Bench, at the Bar, in the Pulpit, and in the Senate, and unavoidably affect our civil and religious Principles. Let us adduce, a few Arguments from Reason, Experience and History.
At Harvard College in the Massachusetts-Bay, and at Yale College in Connecticut, the Presbyterian Profession is in some sort established. It is in these Colonies the
OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
3339 1753
commendable Practice of all who can afford it, to give their Sons an Education at their respective Seminaries of Learning. While they are in the Course of their Education, they are sure to be instructed in the Arts of maintaining the Religion of the College, which is always that of their immediate Instructors; and of combating the Principles of all other Christians whatever. When the young Gentlemen, have run thro' the Course of their Education, they enter into the Ministry, or some Offices of the Government, and acting in them under the Influence of the Doctrine espoused in the Morning of Life, the Spirit of the College is transfused thro' the Colony, and tinctures the Genius and Policy of the public Administration, from the Governor down to the Constable. Hence the Episcopalians cannot acquire an equal Strength among them, till some new Regulations, in matters of Religion, prevail in their Colleges, which perpetually produce Adversaries to the heirarchical System. Nor is it to be questioned, that the Universities in North and South Britain, greatly support the different professions that are established in their respective Divisions.
In the Reign of King James II. of arbitrary and papistical Memory, a Project jesuitically artful, was concerted to poison the Nation, by filling the Universities with popish-affected Tutors; and but for our glorious Deliverance, by the immortal William, the Scheme had been sufficient, in Process of Time, to have introduced and established, the sanguinary and anti-christian Church of Rome .- The Independent Reflector, pp. 67, 68, 70.
THE CHURCH AND THE COLLEGE. Evils of a Sectarian College supported by public Funds. By William Livingston, March 29, 1753.
(Extracts. )
I shall now proceed to offer a few arguments, which I submit to the Consideration of my Countrymen, to evince the necessity and importance of constituting our College upon a Basis the most catholic, generous and free.
It is in the first place observable, that unless its Constitution and Government, be such as will admit Persons of all protestant Denominations, upon a perfect Parity as to Privileges, it will itself be greatly prejudiced, and prove a Nursery of Animosity, Dissension and Disorder. Should our College, therefore, unhappily thro' our own bad Policy, fall into the Hands of any one religious Sect in the Province: Should that Sect, which is more than probable, establish its religion in the College, show favour to its votaries, and cast Contempt upon others; 'tis easy to foresee, that Christians of all Denominations amongst us, instead of encouraging its prosperity, will, from the same Principles, rather conspire to oppose and oppress it. Besides English and Dutch Presbyterians, which perhaps exceed all our other religious Professions put together; we have Episcopalians, Ana- baptists, Lutherans, Quakers, and a growing Church of Moravians, all equally zeal- ous for their discriminating Tenents: Whichsoever of these has the sole Govern- ment of the College, will kindle the jealousy of the rest, not only against the persuasion so preferred, but the College itself.
In such a state of things, we must not expect the Children of any, but of that sect which prevails in the Academy, will ever be sent to it: For should they, the estab- lished Tenets must either be implicity received, or a perpetual religious War neces- sarily maintained.
Another Argument against so pernicious a Scheme is, that it will be dangerous to Society. The extensive Influence of such a Seminary, I have already shown in my last Paper. And have we not reason to fear the worst Effects of it, where none but the Principles of one Persuasion are taught, and all others depressed and dis- countenanced? Where, instead of Reason and Argument, of which the Minds of the Youth are not capable, they are early imbued with the Doctrines of a Party, inforced by the Authority of a Professor's Chair, and the combining Aids of the President,
68
3340
ECCLESIASTICAL RECORDS
1753
and all the other Officers of the College? That religious Worship should be con- stantly maintained there, I am so far from opposing, that I strongly recommend it, and do not believe any such Kind of Society, can be kept under a regular and due Discipline without it. But instructing the youth in any particular Systems of Divinity, or recommending and establishing any single Method of Worship or Church Government, I am convinced would be both useless and hurtful. Useless, because not one in a Hundred of the Pupils is capable of making a just Examination, and reasonable Choice. Hurtful, because receiving Impressions blindly on Authority, will corrupt their Understandings, and fetter them with Prejudices which may ever- lastingly prevent a Judicious Freedom of Thought, and infect them all their Lives, with a contracted turn of Mind.
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.