USA > New York > Ecclesiastical records, state of New York, Volume V > Part 6
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45 | Part 46 | Part 47 | Part 48 | Part 49 | Part 50 | Part 51 | Part 52 | Part 53 | Part 54 | Part 55 | Part 56 | Part 57 | Part 58 | Part 59 | Part 60 | Part 61 | Part 62 | Part 63 | Part 64 | Part 65 | Part 66 | Part 67 | Part 68 | Part 69 | Part 70 | Part 71 | Part 72 | Part 73 | Part 74 | Part 75 | Part 76 | Part 77 | Part 78 | Part 79 | Part 80 | Part 81 | Part 82 | Part 83 | Part 84 | Part 85 | Part 86 | Part 87
That such is the duty of Classis, I do not need to teach it. I sent over a. .draft to my correspondent Jean Guerin living on the Bloemgracht, endorsed to him.
Signed in haste, by your Rev. servant, E. T. Hoevenberg.
January 3, 1750-51. No. 13.
ACTS OF THE CLASSIS OF AMSTERDAM.
Peter de Wind.
1751, Jan. 12th. Art. 11. Rev. Peter de Wind, candidate, called as minister to Bergen and Staten Island, in New Nether- land, and furnished with complete certificates and documents for the call, requested to be examined, finally, and to be ordained. His request was granted. Afterward he was examined and found well qualified, and the instrument of the call was ordered to be inserted in the formulae-book. Quod factum. It was then recom- mended to the Quaestor, at the request of those churches, to make the costs as moderate as possible. xii. 225, 226.
Depp. ad res Exteras.
There were presented by the Deputies ad res Exteras,
1. A letter from New York, of August 10, 1750, signed by Revs. du Bois, Ritzema, and elder Lopkins. ?
2. A letter of Sept. 14, 1750, in the name of the Coetus, signed by Revs. du Bois and Ritzema.
3. Another letter, of August 8, 1750, signed by three, and as they say, in the name of all, the members of the Consistory on Long Island, in Kings County, who adhere to Arondeus.
OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
3149
1751
4. A letter from Queens County, August 10, 1750, (signed by) four members of the Consistory, in the name of all.
5. A letter from Arondeus himself, of August 10, 1750. xii. 230.
Arondeus.
The report (pre-advice) of the Deputies in these matters, as also the letters, were approved.
N. B. The sentence against Arondeus, which should have been recorded here, is now to be found in the Classis (Acta) of Decem- ber 5, 1751. xii. 230.
Examination.
Art. 18. Rev. Peter de Wind and Rev. Brukner having been examined, the former was admitted to the preaching office and ordained thereto, after he had signed the Formulae of Concord, and promised to help promote the Coetus, and to keep up cor- respondence with the Classis. The other, making objections to signing the Formulae, was given time till the next Classis, to ponder the matter maturely, in the fear of God. At the next Classis Rev. Coll van Schelluyne must preside ex ordine. xii. 232.
ACTS OF THE CLASSIS OF AMSTERDAM.
New York, particularly Arondeus. Judgment against Arondeus given, January 12, 1751. [Inserted here, at the proper place, but not recorded until Dec. 5, 1752.]
1752, Dec. 5th. ยง 10 ad 13. The Rev. Depp. report that the judgement against Rev. Arondeus, rendered January 12, 1751, was then neglected to be recorded, and was preserved by us only on a loose paper. The Classis thinks that it should now be spread on the minutes. This was done, and it is of the fol- lowing purport :
The Classis of Amsterdam perceiving to its sorrow that all its efforts to remove the vehement (hoog gaande-high going) and scandalous disputes on Long Island between Revs. Arondeus and van Sinderen, with their respective adherents, are fruitless ; and that all its admonitions to submit these disputes to the judge-
3150
ECCLESIASTICAL RECORDS
1751
ment and decision of the Rev. Coetus of New York, have been contemptuously rejected by Rev. Arondeus and his adherents; yea, also, learning from the communications of some who call themselves consistory-men that the letters written in the name of the Classis for the above mentioned purposes, by its Committee on Foreign Affairs, were assailed in the most shameful and un- christian manner :- (The Classis, therefore) finds itself com- pelled to deliver its final sentence, according to the request here- tofore made by those of Long Island, as to which of these two men is the lawful minister there. The Classis confirms the decision of the Rev. Coetus of New York in this business, and decides that Rev. van Sinderen is the lawful minister there, having been installed as such at the request of the consistory of those congregations. At the same time it decides that Rev. Aron- deus has again intruded himself as minister there in an illegal manner, after he had gone to Raritan, and after the regular installation of Rev. van Sinderen.
Of this decision notice has been given to the Rev. Coetus of New York, that it may appear that the Classis has no other aim than the peace and welfare of those churches, and the mainto- nance of good order. It has, therefore, also given authority to said Coetus, if the Coetus deems it possible and advisable, to reinstate Rev. Arondeus in the office on Long Island, as colleague of Rev. van Sinderen, if both parties will solemnly promise to conduct themselves according to such Articles of Peace and Order, as the said Coetus shall consider most salutary to prescribe to them. In such case the Rev. Arondeus would have to be newly and regularly called there under the supervision of the Rev. Coetus, or a committee of the same appointed for that purpose. But if this last means of pacification be rejected, the Classis will consider Rev. Arondeus as disqualified to administer the Word and Sacraments in the Dutch churches on Long Island, from the time that this judgement of Classis is received.
Thus done in Classis, assembled at Amsterdam, this 12th of January 1751. xii. 313-315.
OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
3151
1751
CHURCH OF NEW YORK.
Manor of Fordham.
New York, Feb. 18, 1751.
Consistory held. After calling on God's name, the Committee on the Manor were authorized to consult with men learned in the law, and if necessary to employ them.
J. Ritzema.
CLASSIS OF AMSTERDAM.
Acts of the Deputies and their Correspondence.
The Classis of Amsterdam to the Coetus of New York, March 2,
1751. Vol. 30, No. 118, page 196.
Rev. Sirs and Beloved Brethren in the Lord :--
Besides the letters sent by Rev. Mr. Du Bois with the candidate De Wind, who was examined to-day and ordained as pastor of the church of Bergen in Staten Island (Bergen and Staten Island), there have also come to hand your honored letters of August 10th and September 14th of the preceding year, (1750.) The first of these was by the hand of Mr. Klopper, who has intelligently, and in a courteous manner, given us no little light toward our better understanding of the sad condi- tion of things on Long Island. Oh that the Spirit of the Lord might dwell in the ministers and members of the churches on that island! What a happy and beneficial condition of affairs might we then hope for there! We notice with real sorrow, from your letter of September 14th, that all your attempts to restore peace among the disputants there have been fruitless; that the passions of Rev. Arondeus and his adherents became more furious than ever-even like the raging sea; and that the Coetus at length felt compelled to declare that Rev. Arondeus is not a lawful pastor in King's County, but that Rev. Van Sinderen alone is such. Our Assembly having already given to your Rev. Assembly the final disposition of this case, and having been further informed of the untractable conduct of these parties, sees no reason why the sentence of the Coetus should not be approved. It therefore hereby con- firms it. Two certificates to this effect, by request, accompany this letter, which certificates will be sent to you by different routes. The substance of them is virtu- ally expressed in this letter, and may also be seen in the Book of the Classis under date of January 12, 1741 [1751]. We hope you will take care to let Arondeus and his friends know of this our sentence; and that the churches of King's County be also informed that we consider Arondeus as having illegally intruded himself into the pastorate there, to which Van Sinderen was legally ordained and sent by us.
And what further can we say, Rev. Brethren? We greatly fear that by this deci- sion, the desired calming of the passions, so greatly excited, will by no means be secured. Their letter which has come into our hands, (deserving only execration because of its unchristian expressions in reference to Rev. Ritzema,) and other reports which we have heard, leave us no room to doubt as to the result. Neither do we think that your suggestion that our Assembly should impose a general silentium on Arondeus in all your regions, would be effectual to that end. Wherefore we sug- gest to your consideration whether some plan cannot be hit upon, so that, while holding the decision of the Coetus to be in every way legal and reasonable, yet, before it take final effect to make one last effort to heal this distressing schism.
Could you not let Arondeus and his friends know that the Classis had approved and confirmed the sentence of Coetus against him; yet, out of respect to our friendly counsel, you were willing again, but for the last time, to ask them whether they would not listen to advice, and secure a brotherly reconciliation, such as might be suggested, upon reasonable and Christian terms? In such reconciliation we do not understand that all the yielding should be done only by Arondeus. No, indeed. We learn to our grief that Van Sinderen is also worthy of censure in several respects; that he, with his party, has acted far from that prudent modesty which became a Christian, much more a Christian minister; that he has abundant reason to confess his faults both before God and men. He ought also to make an effort after recon-
3152
ECCLESIASTICAL RECORDS
1751
ciliation because of exasperating conduct toward his brother, even mocking his public services, as well as for indolence in his own duties of the sacred ministry.
If these parties could be reconciled in some such way, the Coetus would maintain its self-respect, and we all could rejoice together. But should such an attempt fail, the sentence of Coetus must then go into effect, and the churches of King's County be warned henceforth to recognize only the Rev. Van Sinderen as their lawful pastor. Yet this should be done in such a way, we think, that Van Sinderen ought also to be admonished in a brotherly and earnest way, not to pride himself upon a victory achieved; but rather that he should seek to win back to himself those whose feelings he has wounded, by friendly and loving conduct; and that he lay the work of the Gospel more to heart; that he become a proper example to the flock in doc- trine and in conduct. But if he continue to grieve our Assembly we shall have to advise Coetus to deal also with him according to ecclesiastical requirements.
If peace be effected, then whatever has been illegal in the services of Rev. Aron- deus, may, perhaps, be ratified, especially if he were then regularly called. Then might we live in hopes of seeing the longed-for end of these unpleasant quarrels among the Long Islanders, and which have cost us so much trouble and anxiety. Then also might they who have misrepresented the Coetus as well as ourselves find reason to thank us; and instead of cursing, to bless us.
The letter which was sent to us by the Consistory of Rev. Arondeus, not only with his knowledge but also certainly not without his direction, and which deserved nothing but contempt, has, nevertheless been answered by us, lest those people might be wise in their own eyes. In that letter we also inserted our resolution, touching the sentence of Rev. Coetus upon Arondeus, and the only way of saving himself. We also send you the original manuscript from King's County for which you asked us, supposing it might be of some use with those mischievous persons.
We have nothing further to add except to declare that we all wished that Rev. P. De Wint had given better proofs in his examination of having his senses exer- cised in the word of righteousness. All the members of our Assembly were very sorry that he possessed so little knowledge of the doctrines of the truth, If matters had not already advanced as far as they had, no one could have conscientiously have admitted him to the ministry of the word for the congregations which had called him. We have seriously admonished him, with prayer for God's blessing to stir up his gifts and increase them. We trust that the Rev. Brethren of the Coetus, to which he has promised to join himself, will add their admonitions to ours, to the end that he may become, under God's blessing, an able instrument for the extension of his kingdom.
We herewith commend you to the grace of God. We beseech him to bestow his precious blessing in large measure upon your persons and your sacred ministry, to his own glory, and the salvation of many souls. We remain,
Signed as before.
Amsterdam, March 2 1751.
[Many letters, to different colonies, of the same date, are recorded, without repeating the official signature in the Record Book. ]
CLASSIS OF AMSTERDAM. Acts of the Deputies and their Correspondence.
The Classis of Amsterdam to Rev. Arondeus, March 2nd, 1751.
Vol. 30, No. 120, page 209.
To Rev. Mr. Arondeus with the Consistories of Kings and Queens Counties subordinate to him:
Reverend Sir and Brethren :---
The letter addressed by you to Mr. Kloppert has been given to us by his Reverence. He has also given us verbal information
1751
3153
OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
of the condition of affairs on Long Island and the mournful divisions which there prevail. Such facts grieved us most deeply. We could hardly believe that the feelings of Christians, the fol- lowers of the meek and lowly Jesus, could show so much bitter- ness to one another. How deplorable are such actions according to the judgement of every one not altogether devoid of a sense of propriety. In previous letters to you we have earnestly and frankly informed you wherein we considered you in the wrong, and what we deemed necessary for the restoration of peace. Little did we imagine that our letters would cause such a wicked excitement of passion as we have learned from your letter. We are not inclined to answer you as your writing deserves, but will only say that to write such a letter was a great mistake; for therein you assault one of our Deputies in particular, stabbing him savagely because of his happening to be the penman, and even offer his Reverence a challenge, which makes one's hairs stand up on his head at the hearing of it.
You must know that a letter is never sent by our Deputies until it has been read and approved by our Assembly. This was the case with this letter which has so greatly excited you. Ac- cordingly it was our letter, and those were our expressions, and not those of any separate individual of the Deputies. The writer was simply the agent of our Assembly and charged by us to send that letter. He has, therefore, great reason to complain before God of the bitterness manifested against him personally. He is, however, far from wishing to requite the want of charity shown him, but on the other hand beseeches the Savior, Lay not this sin to their charge, for they know not what they do.
Neither have we any reason to depart from our former opinion about the necessity of a Coetus, without, at present, going into minute reasons therefor. But we may not neglect to inform you by this opportunity, that this Coetus, before which you did not choose to appear, (as is evident from the note of Rev. Aron- deus to Rev. Ritzema, written with few marks of propriety,) has notified us, that it, at length, was obliged to make declaration
3154
ECCLESIASTICAL RECORDS
1751
that it recognized as lawful pastor not Rev. Arondeus but Rev. Van Sinderen. It has also requested us if we found this sen- tence lawful, to approve and confirm the same. This we have unanimously done. Therefore your Reverence (we address now especially Rev. Arondeus,) is again declared to have been called and to have entered upon the services of the church in King's County in an unlawful manner; that Rev. Van Sinderen, who was sent there by us, upon the request of the Consistory there (the written original of which request is carefully preserved by us,) is alone the lawful pastor, and according to the promises made in that document can justly require of his congregation what was therein promised him. We are far from approving the wicked mistakes into which he and his adherents have fallen, and we will not neglect to admonish them therefor. But these, even were they as heinous as your letter paints them, could not destroy the lawfulness of his call and commission by us, nor make the call of your Reverence lawful. But it is not our pur- pose, Mr. Arondeus, to ruin you, nor to intensify, by this our declaration, the schism already in the church. We do not wish to make the bitterness of feeling any greater. No, indeed. Our aims are only those of lovers of peace, who truly desire the preservation of yourself as well as of the congregation. May our present counsel, therefore, be acceptable to you and those who sustain you, for it will be our last. It is never too late to make peace. But they who would forswear peace and refuse it are greatly to be pitied, and if they persevere therein will after- ward have to hear the consequences.
Determine, therefore, Reverend Sir and Brethren, to come to terms of peace with Rev. Mr. Van Sinderen and his friends. Do not willfully and obstinately refuse subordination to the Coetus, nor to ourselves, for we committed the management of affairs to the Coetus. Yet we have, after the declaration of their sentence, earnestly requested them still to labor for the effecting of a fraternal peace. If something is lacking in your present call, (for we must continue to believe that it was not in
OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
3155 1751
proper form after the return from the Raretans), it can be here- after amended. We will also, after you have been reconciled to Rev. Van Sinderen, and received a lawful call, make no objec- tions to recognize you as co-pastor with him. How much pleas- anter it would be, if both of you could labor in harmony! Then would the congregations also, after your example, live in peace, and further offences be prevented.
We can only now commit the matter unto Him in whose hands are the hearts of all men, and who is able to turn yours in a way which shall be pleasing to Him. We have satisfied our consciences by these efforts of ours. We trust that you will lovingly follow our advice, that we, with you, may hereafter with confidence stand before the Son of Man, when he shall come and bring to light the hidden things of darkness, even the counsels of the heart. Concluding with such wishes, we subscribe ourselves,
Signed as before.
Amsterdam,
March 2, 1751.
ACTS OF THE CLASSIS OF AMSTERDAM.
Surinam, New York and Pennsylvania.
1751, April 5th. Art. 6. 1. The Committee ad res Exteras received a letter from Surinam, signed August 3, 1750, with the Acta of the Conventus. An extract from said Acta was read by them, as well as their report, (pre-advice), and drafts of letters prepared by them as a reply (to be sent) thither. The first was addressed to the Conventus of Surinam; the other was to be understood as an appendix, clearing up a certain matter that had come up subsequently. The Rev. Assembly gladly allowed these letters to be approved, and despatched.
2. A letter also had arrived from New York, signed (by) Rev. du Bois August 14, 1750, together with accounts of excessive maltreatment of Rev. Schlatter at Philadelphia. His enemies had dismissed him, and called Rev. Steiner as pastor in his place. With this came also the Acta of the Coetus (of New York).
3156
ECCLESIASTICAL RECORDS
1751
3. At the next Classis further report will be given as also of a letter from Kingston, of April 26, 1750, as well as of another letter, to be written to Rev. Schlatter. xii. 235.
CLASSIS OF AMSTERDAM.
Correspondence from America.
Rev. Theodore Frelinghuysen, of Albany, to Rev. Classis of Amsterdam, May 1, 1751.
Portfolio " New York ", Vol. ii.
Extracts in Vol. xxxiii, 247 ; and Reference in Vol. xxiv, 12.
Addressed: To the Very Reverend and Highly-learned Messrs., the Members of the High Rev. Classis of Amsterdam:
Very Reverend Highly-learned Sirs and Brethren, The Members of the High Rever- end Classis of Amsterdam:
The great esteem and reverence which I ever feel towards the High Rev. Classis, compels me to make the profession which I herewith do, of the gratitude which I owe you, for the favorable compliances which you have granted to my various humble requests. These have been made by one who will always endeavor with the most hearty desire and with the greatest circumspection, to be one of the most sub- missive and obedient servants of the High Rev. Classis. Therefore it was with this end in view, that I, from time to time, although with but little fruit, have exerted myself to the utmost, to make the business of the Rev. Coetus acceptable to the Consistory of Albany; but I am now almost in despair of ever being able to succeed, unless a great change in their feelings should occur.
From my very heart do I express my gratitude for the order which the High Rev. Classis has been pleased to give for the ordination of Mr. Samuel Verbryck. I do this not on my own account, but on account of the benefits which Zion will obtain through him. For some time already he has labored in the Lord's harvest in the Church of Tappan. He has done this diligently, watchfully, faithfully, and not without a blessing.
It was, therefore, not without pain, that I found in the letter of High Rev. Classis, wherewith I have been honored the following :- "that the manner in which I requested that the Classis would be pleased to give orders for the examination and ordination of that gentleman, and the arguments used by me to strengthen that request, appeared questionable to the High Rev. Classis." If the reasons for this "questionableness" had been mentioned, I might have been able with more success, to remove the ground for the same; with more success than I can now do, by merely declaring, that I had no idea of writing to Classis at all about this matter, until Mr. Verbryck informed me by a letter, that the Rev. Coetus did not wish to write unless I also wrote. This letter I received just as the yacht, that sails between Albany and New York, was about to depart, and which could barely catch the ship at New York. I must therefore confess that I wrote this letter for Mr. Verbryck in the greatest haste, and with some displeasure; nevertheless I am not conscious that I had any other end in view than the prosperity of Zion.
The Classis have been pleased to express itself, that it will not again easily con- sent to an ordination in this country. For this reason, three young men, whom according to my ability I have instructed in the languages, philosophy and theology, are about undertaking the voyage to Europe, in order to be examined and ordained by the Classis itself. Of their qualifications, the Classis itself will be better able to
3157
OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
1751
judge, than it would become me, to describe the same. These young Nazarenes are the last, so far as I know, of those who have studied with any success in this land. They have a good testimony from all, and are very earnestly desired by the churches which have called them. To these churches the Classis will render a great favor by their consecration to the Sacred Ministry. On their own declaration, they will always acknowledge the Classis with thankful hearts. The same will he also do, who with all humility rejoices that he was permitted in any way to assist in the preparation of these young sons of the prophets for the Sacred Ministry; and who, with the most reverential offer of service, and with the wish for a blessing on the High Rev. Classis, subscribs himself,
Very Reverend and Highly-learned Sirs and Brethren, Your Very Reverends' and Highly-learneds' Very submissive and ever willing servant and brother, Theodorus Frielinghuysen. Albany, May 1. No. 153. Received, July 3, 1751.
Extracts in Vol. xxxiii, 247; and Reference in Vol. xxiv, 12.
ACTS OF THE CLASSIS OF AMSTERDAM.
Rev. N. Hormius (or Wormius ?)
1751, May 3rd. Art. 3. He requests to go as minister to New Netherland. He was directed to report himself to our Depp. ad res Exteras, so that the same may send his address to Revs. Depp. Utriusque Synodi. xii. 236.
LETTERS FROM ABROAD AND FOR ABOARD.
1751, May 3rd. Art. 7. The letters from New York and Kingston, mentioned April 5th, were now read, in extracts, as also the replies to the same. The latter were approved, and are to be forwarded.
At this same time it was reported in a letter from Rev. Wynstok of Harderwyk, that P. de Wind, examined here recently for ordination, and installed as minister on Staten Island (and Ber- gen), was not really a candidate at all, and had therefore exhib- ited forged certificates to the Coetus of New York. The Coetus sent to our Classis only a copy of these certificates. Therefore it was resolved to communicate further with Rev. Wynstok in refer- ence to the time and the documents which are mentioned in these copies. On receiving perfect certainty from him concerning these forgeries, the Coetus of New York will be immediately cautioned to attend to this piece of rascality with all earnestness and pru- dence, and to take care that they'get possession of these forged documents, and send them over to Classis. xii. 237.
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.