USA > Pennsylvania > Clearfield County > History of Clearfield County, Pennsylvania : with illustrations and biographical sketches of some of its prominent men and pioneers > Part 34
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45 | Part 46 | Part 47 | Part 48 | Part 49 | Part 50 | Part 51 | Part 52 | Part 53 | Part 54 | Part 55 | Part 56 | Part 57 | Part 58 | Part 59 | Part 60 | Part 61 | Part 62 | Part 63 | Part 64 | Part 65 | Part 66 | Part 67 | Part 68 | Part 69 | Part 70 | Part 71 | Part 72 | Part 73 | Part 74 | Part 75 | Part 76 | Part 77 | Part 78 | Part 79 | Part 80 | Part 81 | Part 82 | Part 83
This year George R. Barrett, having been elected judge of a district in the ·eastern part of the State, withdrew from politics, which left one of the con- tending factions without a leader in whom they had confidence, and practically solidified the Democratic party under the leadership of Governor Bigler. The :succeeding year, 1856, was perhaps the most memorable one in the history of the political parties in Clearfield county up to that time. Mr. Buchanan then
316
HISTORY OF CLEARFIELD COUNTY.
being the presidential candidate of the united Democrat party, left nothing to disturb the serenity of its councils.
Mr. Swoope had disposed of the Raftsman's Journal to S. B. Row, who, in its columns, advocated the election of John C. Fremont, and commenced the labor of building up the Republican organization in the county. Swoope espoused the cause of Millard Fillmore, and rallied to his support the frag- ments of the old Know-Nothing party organization that still remained in existence. In the eager and exciting contest that followed in the early part of that campaign, the Democratic party appeared to be lost sight of by them. So fierce did it become that personal encounters between leaders frequently occurred. However, early in the campaign the State organizations of the two contending factions succeeded in concentrating upon one State ticket, the effect of which was to renew the fight between the united factions of the oppo- sition and the Democratic party. In this same year a memorable joint discus- sion of the political issues was held at Cherry Tree, in Indiana county, the meeting being composed of voters of Clearfield, Indiana and Cambria counties. George R. Barrett and William A. Wallace represented the Democratic party, and General Harry White, of Indiana, and the late Cyrus Jeffries, of Clearfield county, representing the other side.
The year 1857 was noted for a bolt on the part of Clearfield county Dem- ocrats from the district nomination for the Legislature. The nominee of the convention was Judge Wilcox, the counties of Elk and Mckean overruling the county of Clearfield. The Democrats of Clearfield rebelled at this, and put in nomination James T. Leonard. The contest that followed was on account of the fact that the people of Clearfield county had recently had introduced, by lum- bermen from Maine, the system of floating loose logs in the river and its trib- utaries to Lock Haven and Williamsport for manufacture into lumber. Prior to that time the only manner of transporting lumber to markets had been by rafts. Indictments had been preferred against these innovators, charging them with committing a nuisance, on the ground that the river, being a public high- way, these logs by lodging on rocks and islands, so obstructed the channel as to make the passage dangerous. Failing under the rulings of the court to maintain their position, they demanded legislation on the subject, and upon this issue supported James T. Leonard as an independent candidate. The result, however, was the election of Wilcox, Leonard carrying Clearfield county by a small majority.
While the succeeding years of 1858-9 were marked in the county by great political excitement, growing out of the Kansas and Nebraska trouble, and the rupture between Stephen A. Douglas and James Buchanan, yet in local affairs there were no events of any practical importance. While it was evident that the supporters of Mr. Douglass were largely in the ascendency, yet neither faction became organized as against the other until the year 1860. In this year
317
POLITICAL HISTORY OF CLEARFIELD COUNTY.
the Democratic party assumed the position in this county that the opposition party occupied in 1856. Immediately after the rupture at the Charleston con- vention, meetings were held throughout the county, and members of the party arranged themselves on their respective sides. The regular organization was controlled by the Breckenridge Democrats. The chairman of their county committee was D. F. Etzweiler. The chairman of the Douglas wing of the party was Walter Barrett. The Breckenridge organization was sustained and supported by Governor William Bigler and William A. Wallace. The Doug- las organization was actively sustained by L. Jackson Krans, with the passive but effective support of Judge George R. Barrett.
While it could not but be evident to the party leaders on both sides that defeat was inevitable, yet the whole campaign appeared to be waged with the object of securing control of the regular party organization, which contest cul- minated at the regular annual meeting held in September following. The Douglas men had imported Richard Baux, of Philadelphia, who was an elector at large, to represent them. Under the existing party rules, the chairman of the annual meeting appointed the chairman of the county committee. The result of the contest was that James T. Leonard, a Douglas Democratic elector, was made president of the meeting, and L. Jackson Krans was appointed chair- man of the county committee. Perhaps never in the history of Clearfield county was there exhibited a deeper feeling than in this bitter contest. Mr. Baux was speaking from the steps of Judge Leonard's residence on Second street, and Governor Bigler was at the same time addressing an audience from his own residence on the same street.
The Republican party had, by this time, so far progressed in its organiza- tion as to absorb nearly all of the old American or Fillmore party, with the exception of Mr. Swoope, its leader, and a few devoted followers, who still sup- ported the Bell and Everett American ticket.
The Douglas Democracy obtained the instructions of the regular party organization of the county for James T. Leonard for Congress. The Republi- cans instructed for General John Patton. The result in the respective district conventions was the defeat of Leonard, and the nomination of James K. Kerr, of Venango county. The Republicans, more fortunate, however, secured the nomination of General Patton. The district, at that time, was known as the " Wild Cat" district, extending from the West Branch of the river to Lake Erie. Generally it had been a Democratic district, although during the pre- vious term in Congress it was represented by Chapin Hall, a Republican, through the dissensions in the Democratic party. General Patton was elected through the same cause, carrying Clearfield county by a majority of sixty.
In the year 1861 there appeared to be, on account of the war, a disintegra- tion of parties, followed by an active, complete, and thorough organization in the year 1862. This year was marked by the advent into politics of William 41
318
HISTORY OF CLEARFIELD COUNTY.
A. Wallace, who afterward became a prominent central figure in Pennsylvania politics, and who was elected to the State Senate from the district composed of Clearfield, Cambria and Blair counties, over Lewis W. Hall, then the sitting member. Excepting the rancorous feeling engendered by the war, which was in progress at this time, nothing occurred out of the usual course of partisan politics.
In 1864, the anti-war feeling, fear and distrust that pervaded the people, engendered partly by the bitter antagonisms brought about by the war, and the discussions of its causes, in part induced by a rigid enforcement of the draft, and in a measure, by demagogical appeals to the feelings and passions of the people on both sides, Clearfield county achieved an unenviable position and reputation during the war. This excitement culminated in an immense mass-meeting assembling in the rear of the court-house on the 13th of August, to protest against the course of Mr. Lincoln's administration in the conduct of the war.
In the same year, 1864, Governor William Bigler was pressed by Clear- field county for the nomination for Congress, which he obtained from the dis- trict convention. Although defeated at the general election, he received the largest majority that had ever been given to a candidate in Clearfield county before, notwithstanding it was the year of a presidential election in which party organizations were strictly maintained and party lines closely drawn. From this time, the war having closed, people appeared to be too much en- grossed in adjusting themselves and their business to feel much interest in politics, notwithstanding it was the period in which Andrew Johnson, then president of the United States, was waging his conflict with Congress. While people watched it with great interest and made it the uppermost subject of discussion at their usual evening resorts, yet nothing of interest occurred to affect local politics. The harmony of party relations appeared to be preserved on both sides.
In the year 1868, Judge Linn, then president judge of the judicial district in which Clearfield county was included, having resigned his commission, and Joseph B. McEnally appointed, ad interim, it became necessary to elect a judge to fill the vacancy. The people, without distinction of party, were desirous of electing a Clearfield county man. Clinton county presented the name of Charles A. Mayer ; Centre county that of John H. Orvis, and Clear- field county the name of; George R. Barrett, who was then president judge of the Twenty-second judicial district, but who had always maintained a domicile in Clearfield county. A long and protracted contest followed, the convention sitting in every county of the district, and finally resulted in the withdrawal of the Clearfield county delegates from the convention. A request was presented to Judge Barrett, signed by nearly a thousand Democrats, asking him to be an independent candidate. « The Republican party at a mass meeting held in
Witham A. Wallace ,
319
POLITICAL HISTORY OF CLEARFIELD COUNTY.
Clearfield, also endorsed him as their candidate. After holding the matter some days under advisement, he declined to allow the use of his name, for the reason that it would lead him into a contest not befitting his present position. The result was the nomination by Centre and Clinton counties of Charles A. Mayer, who was subsequently elected over Joseph B. McEnally, the nominee of the Republican district convention, and the appointee of Governor Geary.
In the year 1869 the new methods throughout the State, and the nation as well, being bred, perhaps, by the disorders arising from the reconstruction of the Southern States, and known throughout the country as practical politics, appeared to be receiving attention, close study, and aptitude in practice by those in official power, which resulted in the formation at this time of what has been known in local politics as the "Court-house Ring." Mythical and intangi- ble in its nature, invisible to the eye, but always felt in practical effect. It soon became apparent to all aspirants for political and local honors, that the pilgrimage to Clearfield borough, the conciliation of certain influences, and the approval of certain parties were a condition precedent to a realization of their hopes. At this time the people felt that the public offices were filled by men of fair character and competency, yet from year to year they were becoming less potent in the selection of their public servants. The absence of scandal, charges or suspicion of those in office, turned the attention of the people to the methods by which the officials were selected. Complaints and ominous threats were heard loud and deep, and finally culminated in an explosion in 1873. In that year feeling ran high in the Democratic primaries. James Savage and W. R. McPherson were candidates for sheriff; Dr. T. J. Boyer and Dr. J. W. Pot- ter were candidates for the Legislature; W. W. Worrell and David W. Wise were candidates for treasurer; Frank Fielding and Aaron G. Kramer were candidates for district attorney. McPherson was nominated for sheriff, Boyer for the Legislature, Worrell for treasurer, and Fielding for district attorney. The announcement of this ticket met with open defiance, and charges were made that some of the nominees had been counted in by manipulators at the primaries. John M. Cumming, of New Washington, the friend and neighbor of Savage, whom he believed to have been wrongfully deprived of his nomina- tion, appeared to be the prominent leader of the revolt. Protests and calls for another convention were freely circulated among the people, and the result was another convention within a month and the placing in nomination of the defeated ticket, with minor exceptions. This was followed by a heated and angry contest, the Republicans making no nominations. The result at the polls showed the election of McPherson by a small majority. Potter and Wise defeated Boyer and Worrel, and Fielding was elected district attorney, there being no charges against the fairness of his nomination.
The Democrats engaged in this revolt, and all who had supported the independent ticket, were subjected to severe censure and abuse by the friends
320
HISTORY OF CLEARFIELD COUNTY.
and supporters of the regular nominees. The newspaper organ of the regular Democratic organization gave them the name of Modocs.
They made a regular organization, appointing Henry Kerns, of Curwens- ville, chairman of the county committee. At a meeting held subsequently it was resolved to continue the party for the present in full organization. A mass-meeting was held by the people of the south part of the county, at An- sonville, addressed by Colonel Walter Barrett, at which it was resolved to maintain the organization and make it effective whenever improper nomina- tions were made. The regular organization, becoming alarmed, called a meet- ing of the county committee, upon the assembling of which David L. Krebs, the chairman, resigned, and William M. Mccullough was elected to his stead, to conciliate independent Democrats. A convention was called and the rules changed, the Crawford system abolished, and in its place a limited delegate system adopted.
In the year 1874 an exceptionally strong ticket was nominated and elected with the usual majority. Emboldened by this, the old manipulators, by the same methods, as it was charged, effected the nomination of J. Blake Walters for county treasurer.
In the meantime a new factor in county politics had developed itself in the shape of a secret organization, styling themselves " the Junior Sons of '76." This organization joined with the independent Democrats and the stronger and more influential element of the Republican party, and placed in nomina- tion Captain David McGaughey. The result at the polls showed the defeat Walters and the election of McGaughey.
The effect of this movement was most salutary, not only upon the parties, but upon the people and the confidence that it inspired in the ability of the Democratic party to purify itself when necessary, was shown by the fact that in the succeeding year Samuel J. Tilden received the unprecedented majority of nineteen hundred and one, an achievement never before or since accomplished. Calmness appeared to follow this storm until 1878, when Clearfield county instructed for Israel Test for Congress, but failed to secure his nomination, he being defeated by ex-Governor Andrew G. Curtin, of Centre county.
This year the Greenback party, a new organization, had received large accessions from the Democratic ranks, joined with the Republicans and nom- inated Seth H. Yocum, of Bellefonte. The result was the defeat in the district of Governor Curtin by less than one hundred majority. This was followed by a contest, and to the great credit of Clearfield county it can be said that while hundreds of witnesses were examined, and months consumed in taking testimony, no act of moral turpitude was proven or discovered. The basis of the contest was the irregularity of votes, such as for non-payment of taxes, voters moving in and out of districts within the time prescribed by the consti- tution and other like reasons.
321
POLITICAL HISTORY OF CLEARFIELD COUNTY.
Two years following Clearfield county instructed for Governor Curtin for Congress, who was elected by a fair majority in the district, the Greenback party having dissolved.
In 1884 commenced one of the most memorable contests known in the history of congressional nominations in Pennsylvania. Clearfield county again pronounced in favor of ex-Governor Curtin and appointed Walter Bar- rett, Thomas Brocbank and George W. Dickey, conferees; Centre county, his own home, also instructed for him and appointed William H. Blair, L. Mun- son, and Dr. J. O. Loraine, conferees. The first session of the conference was held at Lock Haven. Adjourning from there, it sat in every county in the district except Clearfield While sitting in Bellefonte, Walter Barrett, on behalf of Clearfield county, and General Blair on behalf of Centre county, withdrew from the conference and placed Governor Curtin in nomination for the office. The Republican district conference was sitting in Bellefonte at the time. Four weeks had been exhausted in a fruitless attempt at a nomination. The mov- ing cause of the withdrawal of Clearfield and Centre counties from the confer- ence was the appearance before them of a committee from the Republican conference, led by Colonel D. H. Hastings, pledging to Clearfield and Centre that if they would nominate Governor Curtin, they, the Republicans, would adjourn without making a nomination, and that they would have no candidate, but their party support Governor Curtin. Relying upon this pledge Clear- field took the action indicated, the remaining four counties nominating James K. P. Hall. After the conferees separated and returned to their homes, the Republicans re-assembled their conference, substituting delegates in place of those who maintained their pledge and adhered to their support of Governor Curtin, and nominated General John Patton, of Clearfield county. After this had been done some Democrats, fearing the result, through the intercession of mutual friends, induced Governor Curtin and Mr. Hall each to submit the question of his candidacy to the Democratic State Central Committee. They decided in favor of Governor Curtin the Saturday night before the election. The election resulted in favor of Governor Curtin and the defeat of General Patton.
In 1885, the only exciting contest that was made was for the office of sheriff. The two principal competitors for the nomination on the Democratic side were Hiram Woodward and George Woodin. The latter received the nomination after a long and heated canvass, but by imprudence and indiscre- tion made himself unpopular with many voters of his party. The Republicans, not slow to see the opportunity presented them, placed in nomination Jesse E. Dale, then postmaster at Du Bois, a man of sterling character, pleasing man- ners, of large and strong family connection, all of which combined to make his election easy. The defeat of Mr. Woodin can hardly be called a defeat of the Democratic party, nor could the election of Mr. Dale be claimed as a Repub-
322
HISTORY OF CLEARFIELD COUNTY.
lican victory ; it was more of a personal contest between the two candidates and their political adherents.
In the year 1886 the political waters of Clearfield county began to boil early. William A. Wallace, having for a long time been spoken of as a can- didate for governor at the coming election, became in July an active aggres- sive candidate, a fact which interested his friends, companions, and neighbors in politics in Clearfield county. He was defeated, however, in the convention by Chauncey F. Black.
Dr. T. W. Potter had been announced as a candidate for Congress, but immediately withdrew, and the friends of Mr. Wallace made him a candidate for the office. He was supported in the convention by Clearfield and Centre counties. He failed to receive the nomination however, and James K. P. Hall was nominated by the convention.
The Republicans, as usual, on the alert for opportunities, nominated Gen- eral John Patton. Then followed the most irregular political contest that was ever seen in Clearfield county. Democrats who had never before wavered in their fidelity to their party, boldly avowed their intention of opposing Hall. Mr. Hall sent one of his brothers to Clearfield county to manage his canvass. Every effort was made to induce deserting Democrats to return to their alle- giance, but it was all in vain. General Patton was elected by a majority of eighty in the county, while Chauncey F. Black, the Democratic candidate for governor, had a majority of fifteen hundred and one.
The result of this contest being yet fresh in the minds of the people is regarded and looked upon by all, as another of those periodical punishments inflicted by an independent people for the use of means and methods in American politics, that are subversive of good government and corrupting to good morals. General Patton had achieved a reputation in Clearfield county, and the whole district as well, for charity, benevolence, and public spiritedness, that made it an easy matter for the Republican party, using him as a weapon, to break down the existing Democratic majority ; a man of large wealth, intri- cate business interests ramifying through every section of the county, he was well and personally known to nearly all the voters. His connection with educational and church affairs was such as to bring him an active support from that quarter.
323
CIVIL LIST AND COUNTY ORGANIZATIONS.
CHAPTER XX.
CIVIL LIST AND COUNTY ORGANIZATIONS.
OVERNOR .- William Bigler, 1851-4.
G United States Senators .- William Bigler, 1856-61 ; William A. Wal- lace, 18 -.
Representatives in Congress .- Alexander Irvin, 1846-8; John Patton, 1861-3, 1887-8.
State Senators .- William Bigler, 1842; Alexander Irvin, 1847; William A. Wallace, 1863-75 ; Thomas J. Boyer, 1876; William W. Betts, 1887.
Representatives in State Legislature .- Martin Hoover, first (date unknown) ; Greenwood Bell, second ; John Irvin, third ; James Ferguson, 1837-8; James H. Lafferty, 1839-40; G. R. Barrett, 1841-2; Lewis W. Smith, 1844-5; Charles S. Worrell, 1846-7 ; George Walters, 1848-9; William J. Hemphill, 1850-1 ; A. Caldwell, 1853-4; T. J. Boyer, 1858-62-3-4 ; Thomas J. Mc- Cullough, 1867-8; John Lawshe, 1872-3 ; Johnson W. Potter, 1874; W. R. Hartshorn, 1875-6; Aaron C. Tate, 1877-8 ; A. D. Bennett, 1879-80; James Flynn, 1881-2; J. P. Taylor, 1883-4; J. H. Norris, 1885-6; Aaron G. Kramer, 1887-8.
President Judges .- Charles Huston, 1822-6; Thomas Burnside, 1826-41 ; George W. Woodward, 1841-51; R. G. White, 1851-2; John C. Knox, 1852-3 ; James' T. Hale, 1853; James Burnside, 1853-9; James Gamble, 1859; Samuel Linn, 1859-68 ; Joseph B. McEnally, 1868 ; Charles A. Mayer, 1868-75; John H. Orvis (addl. law judge), 1875 ; David L. Krebs, 1883.
Associate Judges .- Francis W. Rawle, Moses Boggs, 1822-6; Moses Boggs, Hugh Jordon, 1826-40; Moses Boggs, James Ferguson, 1840-1 ; James Ferguson, John Patton, 1841-6; Abram K. Wright, James T. Leonard, 1846-51 ; Richard Shaw, John P. Hoyt, 1851-6; William L. Moore, Benja- min Bonsall, 1856-61 ; James Bloom, John D. Thompson, 1861-6; Samuel Cloyd, Jacob Wilhelm, 1866-71; William C. Foley, John J. Read, 1871-6; Vincent Holt, Abram Ogden, 1876-81 ; John L. Cuttle, John Hauckenbury, 1881-6.
Deputy Attorneys-General and District Attorneys .- From the fact that it is impossible to furnish all the dates of incumbency of this office, it is deemed prudent to give only the succession of incumbents thereof; and in this a pos- sible error may occur : Samuel M. Green, Josiah W. Smith, Samuel H. Tyson, George R. Barrett, Lewis W. Smith, John F. Weaver, D. Rush Petrikin, George W. Hecker, J. B. McEnally, Joseph S. Frantz, Thomas J. Mccullough, Robert J. Wallace, Israel Test, William M. Mccullough, A. W. Walters, Frank Fielding, William M. Mccullough, Joseph F. McKenrick, Smith V. Wilson.
324
HISTORY OF CLEARFIELD COUNTY.
Sheriffs .- 1822, Greenwood Bell; 1823-6, Greenwood Bell; 1826-9, William Bloom ; 1829-32, Lebbeus Luther ; 1832-5, Robert Ross ; 1835-8, James Ferguson ; 1838-41, Abram K. Wright ; 1841-4, George Leech ; 1844-7, Ellis Irwin ; 1847-50, John Stites; 1850-3, Alexander Caldwell ; 1853-6, William Powell ; 1856-9, Josiah R. Read ; 1859-62, Frederick G. Miller ; 1862-5, Edwin Perks ; 1865-8, Jacob A. Faust; 1868-71, Cyrenius Howe ; 1871-4, Justin J. Pie; 1874-7, William R. McPherson; 1877-80, Andrew Pentz, jr .; 1880-3, James Mahaffey ; 1883-6, R. Newton Shaw ; 1886, Jesse E. Dale.
Register and Recorders .- This office became separated from that of pro- thonotary in 1856. Since that time the succession has been as follows : James Wrigley, 1856-62; Isaiah G. Barger, 1862-8; Asbury W. Lee; 1868-74 ; L. J. Morgan, January, 1875-81 ; George M. Ferguson, 1881-7 ; D. R. Ful- lerton, 1887.
Treasurers .- During the early years, when treasurers were appointed an- nually, it is impossible to ascertain the correct time the officer held the posi- tion ; it is therefore deemed expedient to furnish nothing more than the suc- cession in the order of their holding, respectively : Arthur Bell, Samuel Cole- man, Samuel Fulton, Alexander B. Reed, James Ferguson, Alexander Irvin, G. Philip Geulich, Martin Hoover, James T. Leonard, Christopher Kratzer, D. W. Moore, Robert Wallace, J. W. Wright, Isaac Bloom, Arthur Bell, John McPherson, Eli Bloom, John McPherson, George B. Goodlander, Joseph Shaw, Christopher Kratzer, D. W. Moore, William K. Wrigley, Lever Flegal, Samuel P. Wilson, David W. Wise, David McGaughey, Philip Dotts, John W. Wrig- ley, John M. Troxell.
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.