USA > Massachusetts > Plymouth County > Duxbury > Town annual report for the town of Duxbury for the year ending 1951-1955 > Part 12
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45 | Part 46 | Part 47 | Part 48 | Part 49 | Part 50 | Part 51 | Part 52 | Part 53 | Part 54 | Part 55 | Part 56 | Part 57 | Part 58 | Part 59 | Part 60 | Part 61
SCALE OF FEET WHITMAN & HOWARD. ENGINEERS BOSTON, MASS. 1952
DUXBURY BAY
MASSACHUSETTS
BAY
GREAT WOOD ISLAND
ST.
PROPOSED
RIVER
OD ISLAND
GREAT WO
Y
ir
BACK
ONE7SI TOOM
STUDIED
NEW ROAD
ROUTE
STREET
RTE. 3A
735
STREET
TREMONT
11
STREET
89
Engineers because of the existing emergency condi- tions due to the Korean situation. However, it is ex- pected that at some future date, this study will be undertaken and therefore your Committee recommends that this matter be laid on the table, as far as Duxbury is concerned, as otherwise there would be a costly duplication of work by the Town of Duxbury.
Regarding the question of approaches to the north- erly end of Duxbury Beach, your Committee engaged the services of Whitman & Howard, Engineers, 89 Broad Street, Boston, who were selected after finding that they were specially well qualified to study the problem before us. The engineers submitted the fol- lowing report:
October 28, 1952
Duxbury Beach Committee Duxbury Massachusetts
Gentlemen :
We were authorized by the Duxbury Beach Com- mittee to study suitable approaches to the north end of Duxbury Beach and prepare estimates of recommended improvements and additions to such approaches. We have held two meetings with your Committee and have made reconnaissance surveys and have made in- vestigations by means of rod sounding, of the depth to hard bottom for road building.
There are two general methods of approach to the north end of Duxbury Beach from the west and from the north: one across the marsh from Cox's Corner, Duxbury via Duck Hill Road or other points easterly
90
along the Marshfield shore line of the marsh; the other by means of an improved road from the north along the present road from Marshfield or an alternate route following the present road and the edge of the hard land along the ocean beach.
The first alternative above was studied following a route from Duck Hill Road, which would give good access both from the north and from Duxbury Center, thence across the marsh via Little and Great Wood Islands to North Duxbury Beach, a distance of some 21/4 miles from the junction of Routes 139 and 3A (Cox's Corner). About one-half mile of this route is over the present Duck Hill Road, which is narrow, and by a sand road to the edge of the marsh. The remain- der, approximately one and three quarter miles, is across the marsh and tidal rivers via the two Wood Islands. An investigation of this route indicates that an average of at least 15 feet of peat must be removed and refilled with solid material across the marsh - only a small saving is realized by using the islands as they contain little solid material. Estimates of cost were made which included widening Duck Hill Road from Cox's Corner, grading and paving the sand road to the edge of the marsh and making road excavation and refilling across the marsh. The cost developed, based on hydraulic filling, was close to $1,000,000. We be- lieve this is excessive and uneconomic; we do not be- lieve this is in the interest of the Town of Duxbury, and do not recommend that this route be considered by the town.
The second route noted above was studied following a line parallel to the present road from near the Marshfield Town line to the Beach area and some two hundred and fifty feet west along the edge of the marsh. The distance here is about four thousand feet
91
of which two thousand feet is along the edge of the marsh and the remainder follows the existing roads. Somewhat better foundation conditions were found here due to the fact that the marsh land portion of this proposed road parallels the edge of the hard land along the ocean beach. Examination of the plan ap- pended to this report will show that the proposed new road location starts just south of the Marshfield Town line passing to the westward of the houses for the first two thousand feet and joining the present road again where it may be readily widened without appreciable property damage. Widening of the present road throughout its entire length would not be practical due to excessive property damage and a winding layout. Estimates were prepared for the construction of this proposal which include approximately two thousand feet of road excavation and refill along the edge of the marsh, two thousand feet of widening of existing way and paving with high type pavement the entire four thousand feet from the Marshfield line to the Beach reservation. The cost developed was $225,000. We recommend this as the most appropriate and economic method of providing adequate approach to the north- erly part of Duxbury Beach.
We have discussed with the State Planning Board their thoughts on the improvement of Duxbury Beach with specific reference to the approaches. They would, as of the present time, recommend a road from Cares- well Street, Marshfield at Webster street (Gov. Win- slow House) southeasterly, approximately parallel to Careswell and Canal Streets at the edge of the marsh to the Duxbury Town line. The appended map will show that such a route would join the road proposed in this report shortly after crossing the Duxbury line. We believe that the route here proposed is consistant with the State's thinking and is as much as the Town of
92
Duxbury as a municipality can do toward forwarding this plan.
In our opinion if state and county aid are made available our recommended route is a practical solu- tion to the problem of an accessible public beach at Duxbury.
Yours very truly,
WHITMAN & HOWARD, Engineers By John B. Moseley (Signed)
CONCLUSION :
Your Committee recommends that the second pro- posal of the Engineers, namely, a new road from the Marshfield line roughly paralleling the present road to the auto park be adopted, provided the building of this road qualifies under Chapter 90 of the General Laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, under which one-half of the cost would be assumed by the Commonwealth, one-quarter by the County, and one- quarter by the Town of Duxbury.
The engineers estimate that the total cost of such a road would be $225,000, which would result in a cost to the Town of $56,250. At first blush, this sum of money may appear to be more than the Town could afford, but if this were paid for over a 10-year period by means of a bond issue, it seems to your Committee it would be a very sound investment and for the best interest of the Town of Duxbury for the following reasons :- -
1. An improved access to the northerly end of the beach would put an end to the complaints that Dux- bury Beach is inaccessible to the citizens of Massachu- setts, particularly those living south of Boston in such communities as Brockton, Middleboro, Taunton, etc.
93
2. The new road would divert a substantial amount of traffic from the residential areas of Duxbury and help to maintain the present atmosphere of the Town.
3. The new road would be an additional safeguard against property devaluation in residential areas which now are a substantial source of income to the Town.
4. The new road would increase property values on the present road leading from Marshfield to the north- erly end of the beach.
5. The new road would decrease the fire hazard in the general area of the present winding road in making this propert , more accessible to the Fire De- partment by eliminating the present traffic jams which occur whenever the northerly end of the beach is used to the capacity of the parking area.
6. The new road will probably increase the use of the beach and assist the Beach Associates in contin- uing their policy of making improvements to their fa- cilities for the use of the general public.
7. The new road would reduce the probability of State seizure of the beach, as the chief argument for seizure is the inaccessibility of the beach.
It should be noted that the State Planning Board has filed a bill in the Massachusetts Legislature to pro- vide for the development of Salisbury and other ocean beach areas. The purpose of this bill appears to be a good one, as Section 2 reads :
"It is hereby declared to be the policy of the Com- monwealth that all such sites acquired and/or de- veloped by the Department shall, insofar as prac- ticable, be preserved in their natural state and
94
that they shall be collectively self-supporting and that no commercial activities except those essen- tial to quiet enjoyment of the facilities by the people shall be permitted."
In spite of this statement of policy, your Committee feels that the Town should proceed with the building of the new road, first, because statements of policy can be changed by future legislation, and second, because it is more in keeping with the tradition of Duxbury to solve its own problems without State intervention.
Your Committee recognizes that 'he new road can- not become reality before the yeatt 1954 and that mean- while there will be continued complaints from out-of- town visitors who drive to the beach over the Powder Point Bridge, only to find that there are no parking facilities and that they must take a circuitous route back through the town to the northerly end of the beach. We would suggest that the police officers on duty at the beach end of the bridge be provided with some maps of the road from the beach back through the town to Route 139 and thence to the parking area. The 'Committee further recommends that suitable signs be erected at strategic points directing traffic to the Dux- bury Beach parking area. We believe that the good- will thus created would be out of all proportion to the small cost of providing such services.
Respectfully submitted,
GEORGE H. BAHM, Chairman E. M. FARNSWORTH, JR. H. GILBERT FRANCKE LEONARD B. GALLAGHER DAVID H. MARSHALL
.
95
REPORT OF TARKILN YOUTH CENTER
January 10, 1953
The program for the past year has been very satis- factory.
Several parties were held for the small fry on the major holidays of the year furnishing them with enter- tainment, refreshments and gifts.
We have started construction of our new kitchen and hope to have it completed by early spring.
Our Teen-age enrollment is now at 115 members. This membership has necessitated the hiring of a pro- fessional instructor. We have been very fortunate in acquiring the services of Mr. McGarigal, a faculty member of the Duxbury High School.
Our weekly teen-age parties are very successful. Ballroom dancing and square dancing are being taught. Our other activities such as roller-skating, ping-pong, checkers and television make up a very well rounded pro- gram.
We are very grateful to all citizens of the town for their generosity and cooperation.
Respectfully submitted,
D. E. LaGRECA, Chairman EMILY LORING, Secretary MRS. JOSEPH DeLORENZO, Pres.
96
REPORT OF THE HOWLAND'S LANDING COMMITTEE
To the Honorable Board of Selectmen
and the Citizens of Duxbury :
In accordance with the vote taken at the Special Town Meeting of June 27, 1952, authorizing the Selectmen to appoint a Committee to study the matter of the construc- · tion of a pier or float at Howland's Landing, we the un- dersigned, after a careful study, deliberation, and con- sultation with all interested persons and town officials, do respectfully submit the following recommendations.
I. After considering and investigating the many town landings and approaches to the water now owned or available to the town, the Committee feels that How- land's Landing is the most logical site for the construc- tion of a pier, which in effect would create a secondary mooring area. Our decision is based on these three main considerations.
First, the channel in which the boats would be moored is a natural one requiring no dredging, and offering an average minimum or ten feet of water at low tide. In addition it is a dead end channel, so that boats moored there would not hinder a means of through navigation. It would also lend itself to enlargement by dredging if in future years that was consideredd desirable.
II. We also recommend, as do the Selectmen, that the pier should be constructed of a similar design to the town
5.29-4 E
36.00
CRESCENT
ST.
$ 480 0's
295.88
1
DRILLPOLE IN S.B.
PPPILLHOLA IN S.B.
5 42 30 V
TOWN
PROPOSED TAKING UNTER PARA GRAPH
NORTH
DR. HARE'S PROPERTY
LANDING
442.75
-5 43º35'W
761. 06. 7
ENTIRE LENGTH 742.10 ±
ROAD
HOUSE
40.000
BRILL HOLE
$46 27'E
50
129.64
399.67
-
-
-
-
PIPE? K
MEAN HIGH WATER
PROPOSED TAKING UNDER PARAGRAPH
5 30°40'w
KINGSTON
BXY
- N 330 55 W
APPROXIMATE EXTREME LAW WATER MARK
715.00₺
1
1
1
5 43.3WWALTER N. SMITH
365.
-
PROPOSED NEW PIER
5)77º 32 W
EXISTING STONE WARE
- 1390 40 W
1,25.64N
MEAN HIGH WATER &
20'
CHURCH UNION PROP.
PINE
188.38
PRILL HOLD · IM S.R.
PROPOSED TAKING UNDER PARAGRAPH "&"
97
pier now in use at the Mattakeesett Court, which is known to many as the Yacht Club Basin. In this connec- tion, we have made pressure hole soundings to determine that the bottom is adequate to support the pilings of such a pier. We also feel that savings could be effected through the use of salvaged timbers from the Powder Point Bridge and the use of second-hand telephone poles for pilings, as were recently used in the construc- tion of the Duxbury Marine Railway pier.
On a basis of preliminary estimates received, we be- lieve such a pier would cost about three dollars ($3.00) per square foot, or, on the basis of an eight foot recom- mended width, approximately twenty-four ($24.00) per running foot.
The Committee feels that the most logical way to con- struct such a pier, from a point of view of initial cost and long-term maintenance, would be over the shorter dis- tance from high water mark to the channel at low water mark. Based on our actual measurements of an 11.7 foot tide at low run-off, the pier, including it's ap- proaches, ramp, and floats, would have to cover a dis- tance of approximately 183 feet. We therefore recom- mend an appropriation of $4,500.00 to cover the cost of this construction.
It should be pointed out, however, that at this point these measurements and cost are based on certain land takings or purchase by the town as described under the following heading numbered III.
In the event this plan was not followed, we would then recommend that the pier be constructed on the right of way the Town now owns, which would involve cover- ing a distance of approximately 261 feet at extreme low run-off or an appropriation of $6,300.00.
98
III. In the best interests of the Town, from a long range point of view, your Committee feels that the Selectmen should be authorized to either accept, purchase for a nominal price, or take by right of Emminent Do- main, the following parcels of land :
(a) A certain parcel of land situated in Duxbury, Plymouth County, Massachusetts, bounded and described as follows :
Beginning at a cement bound in the Northwesterly line of Town Landing Road, as shown on the plan hereinafter mentioned, said cement bound being located S 42° 30'W, 360.50 feet from a cement bound in the Southwesterly line of Crescent Street which marks the Easterly corner of land of Hugh F. Hare et ux; thence running S 77º 32'W, by land of said Hugh F. Hare et ux, 365 feet, more or less, to a point; thence turning and running S 33° 55'E, 296 feet, more or less, by Kingston Bay to the Northwesterly line of Town Landing Road protracted Southwesterly into Kingston Bay; and thence turning and running N 30° 40' E, by said Northwesterly line of Town Landing Road protracted Southwesterly into Kingston Bay and by the Northwesterly line of Town Landing Road, 381.60 feet to the cement bound at the point of beginning.
Being a portion of the premises shown on Land Court Plan No. 10966A, drawn by W. Nelson Booney, surveyor, dated July 14, 1925, as modified and approved by the Court, filed in the Land Registration Office, a copy of a portion of which is filed with Certificate of Title No. 2260.
(b) A certain parcel of land situated in Duxbury, Plymouth County, Massachusetts, being bounded and de- scribed as follows :
Beginning at a point in the Southwesterly line of Town Landing Road, as shown on the plan hereinafter men-
99
tioned, which point is located 20.00 feet Northeasterly from High Water Mark, as shown on said plan;
Thence running Southeasterly by a line parallel to and distant 20.00 feet Northeasterly from High Water Mark, as shown on said plan, 50 feet to a point ;
Thence turning and running S 30° 40' W to Low Water Mark, as shown on said plan;
Thence turning and running a generally Northwesterly direction by said Low Water Mark, as shown on said plan, to the Southeasterly line of Town Landing Road protracted Southwesterly into Kingston Bay;
Thence turning and running N 30° 40' E by said Southeasterly line of Town Landing Road protracted Southwesterly into Kingston Bay and by the Southeaster- ly line of Town Landing Road to the point of beginning.
Being a portion of the premises shown on Land Court Plan No. 15679A, drawn by Delano & Keith, surveyors, dated July 31, 1934, as modified and approved by the Court, filed in the Land Registration Office, a copy of a portion of which is filed with Certificate of Title No. 5371.
(c) A certain parcel of land situated in Duxbury, Plymouth County, Massachusetts, being bounded and de- scribed as follows :
Northeasterly by the Southwesterly line of Crescent Street, 20.00 feet;
Northwesterly by the Southeasterly line of Town Land- ing Road, 475.67 feet;
Southwesterly 20.00 feet, and
Southwesterly 476 feet, more or less, by land of Massa- chusetts New Church Union.
Being a strip of land 20.00 feet in width adjoining the
100
Southeasterly line of Town Landing Road between Crescent Street and a line 20.00 feet Northeasterly from and parallel to High Water Mark, and being a portion of the premises shown on Land Court Plan No. 15679A, drawn by Delano & Keith, surveyors, dated July 31, 1934, as modified and approved by the Court, filed in the Land Registration Office, a copy of a portion of which is filed with Certificate of Title No. 5371.
By the Town acquiring the parcels of land listed under (a) and (b) above, there would then be available ade- quate room along and above the High Water Mark ad- joining the pier to provide ample space for docking of boats, landing of tenders, and available space for en- larging the basin at a future date. Item (c) would . provide the additional width needed along the road to improve the parking facilities.
On a basis of estimates received, we recommend an appropriation of $500.00 be made to remove trees and stumps, and to provide gravel topping so as to make available the full use of the forty foot road the Town now owns. However, if the additional 20 feet taking was made under the above sub-paragraph (c), we recommend the sum of $900.00 be appropriated for this purpose and also include moving back a small existing barn which is on the boundary line.
In general, this committee feels that the adoption of the above recommendations are urgently needed in view of the crowded conditions which now prevail at the Yacht Club Basin, and that in addition, such a pro- ject in the years to come, would prove to be worth many times the initial cost to the citizens of Duxbury.
Respectfully submitted,
HENRY McNEIL DAVID H. MARSHALL CLEMENT BRIGGS
101
REPORT OF TOWN CLERK MARRIAGES RECORDED IN DUXBURY IN 1952
January 1. In Duxbury, Roderic N. MacDonald, Jr., of Duxbury, and Barbara M. Dearborn of Ply- mouth, by the Rev. William S. Anthony.
January 10. In Duxbury, Howard L. Randall of Dux- bury, and Elsie (Clark) Randall of Duxbury, by Rev. Lawrence I. Moore.
January 26. In Duxbury, Roger VanCott Nelson of Easton, and Beatrice Alden of Center Barnstead, N. H., by Rev. John W. Estes, Jr.
February 2. In Duxbury, Phillip Hood Connolly of Washington, D. C. and Sibyl Ann Ringquist of Duxbury, by Rev. William P. Conley.
February 5. Marvin A. Grogan and Emma E. (Brown) Harding, both of Duxbury, by George W. Cushman, J. of P.
February 21. In Duxbury, Robert L. Huff and Mar- jorie E. Peterson, both of Duxbury, by Rev. Law- rence I. Moore.
March 29. In Kingston, Virginio P. Tavares of Dux- bury, and Sophrona E. (Hathaway) Silvia of Kingston, by Rev. Norval E. Kern.
March 29. In Boston, Duncan I. Scott of So. Dart- mouth, and Anne Kelley of Duxbury, by Rev. Rob- ert G. Metters.
102
April 15. In Duxbury, Benjamin Hadley Prouty of Kingston, and Anita Bell Courier of Duxbury, by Rev. William S. Anthony.
May 2. In Nashua, N. H., Antonio Lopes of Duxbury, and Ruth Ellen Johnson of Pembroke, by Edward S. LeBlanc, J. of P.
May 18. In Lynn, Robert W. Peterson of Duxbury, and Caryl A. Wilford of Revere, by Rev. Percy M. Hickcox.
May 24. In Duxbury, Richard Heath Marshall and Joan Candace Leatherbee, both of Duxbury, by Rev. John W. Estes, Jr.
June 14. In Duxbury, Earnest M. Brubb of Denton, N. C. and Mary Frances Cohen of Duxbury, by Rev. Herman F. Lion.
June 15. In Orange, Philip Ross of Duxbury, and Jane McElroy of Orange, by Rev. Osmond J. Billings.
June 14. In Duxbury, John T. Weaver of Bronx, N. Y. and Ruth Mullowney of Boston, by Rev. Bernard J. Winn.
June 21. In Duxbury, Stanley Joseph Zanotti of Quincy, and Laura Keith Post of Duxbury, by Rev. William S. Anthony.
June 21. In Waltham, Frederick W. Bacon, Jr., of Duxbury, and Rosalie M. Mumford of Watertown, by Rev. Dennis J. Burns.
June 29. In Provincetown, Walter Nelson Smith of Duxbury and Rita Marshall Paige of Province- town, by Rev. Arthur O. Dewey.
103
July 5. In Duxbury, Edwin I. Baker, Jr., of Duxbury and Phyllis Mary Ghidoni of Plymouth, by Rev. Herman F. Lion.
July 12. In Duxbury, John Bernard McAloon of Newton Center and Nancy Mae Glass of Duxbury, by Rev. William P. Conley.
July 26. In Duxbury, Richard J. Wansker and Mar- garet R. Hadley, both of Duxbury, by Rev. George N. C. Mott.
August 2. In Plymouth, Daniel M. Wirzburger of Plymouth and Beverly Ann Randall of Duxbury, by Rev. David G. Bonfiglio.
August 2. In Duxbury, Lawrence Tose of Wollaston, and Ariel Winsor Green of Brookline, by Rev. Frederic C. Lawrence.
August 16. In Duxbury, Bradford Wheeler Jameson and Nancy Clarke, both of Duxbury, by Rev. John W. Estes, Jr.
August 17. In Duxbury, John C. Wolfe and Frances (Redlon) Covell, both of Duxbury, by Rev. Her- man F. Lion.
September 3. In Kingston, Edward W. LeClair and Marguerite Carolan, both of Duxbury, by George W. Cushman, J. of P.
September 7. In Duxbury, William R. Whitehouse and Lorraine T. April, both of Duxbury, by Rev. William P. Conley.
September 13. In Wellesley Hills, Edwin Palmer Leonard, III of Duxbury and Marjorie Joan Ful- ton of Wellesley Hills, by Rev. Robert F. Blakes- ley.
104
September 18. In Duxbury, Richard W. Beveridge and Muriel C. LeClair, both of Duxbury, by Rev. John W. Estes, Jr.
October 15. In Philadelphia, Pa., Lexton Smith and Barbara A. Fernandes, both of Duxbury, by Rev. J. C. King.
October 16. In Cambridge, Chapin Wallour of Wel- lesley Hills and Ann Converse of Duxbury, by Rev. Edmund K. Sherrill.
October 25. In Duxbury, Paul J. Bresnahan and Genevieve T. (McCorkle) Bancroft, both of Dor- chester, by Rev. William P. Conley.
October 31. In Duxbury, William Paul Hamann and Mary (Ross) Smith, both of Hingham, by Rev. John W. Estes, Jr.
November 10. In Plymouth, Robert L. Hathaway of Plymouth and Patricia F. Higgins of Duxbury, by Herbert K. Bartlett, J. of P.
November 11. In Manchester, N. H., William San- ders Rising, Jr., of Duxbury and Martha Eliza- beth White of Marshfield, by Rev. Ernest R. Lackeman.
December 20. In Boston, Kenneth Shaw Safe, Jr., of Providence, R. I., and Elizabeth Kelley of Dux- bury, by Rev. Robert G. Metters.
(1951 Marriages received too late for 1951 Town Report)
November 24, 1951. In Portsmouth, New Hamp- shire, John A. Brock, Jr., and Nancy G. Hazel- hurst, both of Duxbury, by Rev. J. Warren Somerby.
BIRTHS REGISTERED IN DUXBURY IN 1952
Date 1952 Name Jan. 10 Demetra Maria Kamataris
Jan. 15
Allan Morse Graves
Royal S., III, and Alice D.
Jan. 1 Gertrude Lillian Coffin
Daniel W. and Gertrude L.
Mahoney
Jan. 21 Paul Michael Balboni
Peter S. and Helen M.
La Voie
Jan. 29
Timothy James Walsh
Joseph H. and Madeline E.
Maher
Jan. 30 Terence Glover Byrne
Robert D. and Dorothy M.
Nogueira
Feb. 5 Timothy Walton Nelson
George E. and Deborah R.
Holmes
Feb. 13 Dale Maxwell Billings, Jr.
Dale M. and Lillian E.
McKinney
Feb. 15 Brooke Cranston Lench
Charles H., Jr. and Sharon A.
Anderson
Feb. 16 Lynne Carolen Gorham
Ralph A. and Carolen E.
· Bearce
105
Feb. 17 Elizabeth Curry
Robert J. and Eleanor A.
Porter
Feb. 22 Christopher Gilman Tufts
John S. and Helen B.
Everett
Mar. 2
Susan Ann LaGreca
Anthony F. and Eli
Olsen
Mar. 12 Craig Emerson Tewksbury
Emerson S. and Nancy B.
O'Neil
Mar. 15 John Rogers Belknap
Robert E., Jr. and Mary V.
Rogers
Apr. 5 Kathleen Chetwynde
Harry A. and Mildred H.
Whiting
Apr. 7 Denise Jane Cope
Philip H. and Genevieve A.
Kotnick
Apr. 8 Jo-Anne Marshall
John, Jr. and Jocelyn Lee
Garrett
Apr. 13 Lynn Gail Chetwynde
Clyde H. and Ruth J.
Josselyn
Apr. 25 Scott Edwards Lillie
Richard C. and Priscilla
Stuart
Apr. 29 Eric Thomas Johnson
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.