History of Monmouth county, New Jersey, Part 15

Author: Ellis, Franklin, 1828-1885; Swan, Norma Lippincott. [from old catalog]
Publication date: 1885
Publisher: Philadelphia, R. T. Peck & co.
Number of Pages: 1148

USA > New Jersey > Monmouth County > History of Monmouth county, New Jersey > Part 15

Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).

During the time which intervened between the presentation of Bowne and Grover's peti- tion on behalf of the Navesink people and the publication of Sir George Carteret's reply, as above, the Dutch had retaken the country en- braced in the provinces of New York and New Jersey, and their Governor, Colve, had con- firmed to the English settlers their rights of property. This, together with the fact that Sir Edmund Andros, on assuming the Gover- worship at New York, after the second expulsion of the Dutch, in 1674, published a proclama- tion promising the confirmation of " all former grants, privileges or concessions heretofore granted, and all former estates legally possessed by any under his Royal Highness before the late Dutch government," revived the hopes of the Monmouth patentees that the validity of their grant from Nicolls would, after all, be

2 This, doubtless, has reference to the fact that the peo- ple of the Navesink towns were not represented in the disorganizing sessions of the East Jersey Assembly, held in 1671-72, and took little, if any, part in the attempt made at that time to establish a new government, with Captain James Carteret at its head as " President of the Country."

1 Leaming and Spicer, pp. 35-37.

EARLY SETTLEMENTS AND LAND TITLES.

finally conceded and established.1 Nevertheless, therewith." Then the agents, Bowne, Harts- they very readily accepted the five hundred horne and Parker, claimed for the people that the five hundred aere grants were to be free of quit-rents ; but this the Governor and Council positively denied, and refused to accede to, and finally, after much further unavailing discussion, the conference (which appears to have been the last which was held by the Monmouth patentees with the Governor and Council on the subject) was closed without any satisfactory result to acre grants, in reference to which the following is found in the " Record of the Governor and Council of East Jersey," under date of May 17 and 18, 1683: "The patentees accepted of the same [the five hundred acre tracts ] and pe- titioned to have the same laid out. Warrants were granted for the same. Some were sur- veyed and patented, particularly that of Rich- ard Hartshorne, which appeared to be a full : either side.

conclusion of that affair, unless it was made to appear that such petition and procedure were not by consent or approbation of the Towns."

In 1677 the following "Opinion concerning Coll. Nicolls' Patent and Indian Purchases " was given by the King's Council, viz .:

On the following day (May 18th) the Gov- ernor and Council held a consultation with John Bowne, Richard Hartshorne and Joseph Par- ker, representing the Navesink settlements. " We inquired," says the record, " into the truth " Upon the questions submitted : Ist, whether the grants made by Col. Nicolls are good against the assigns of Lord Berkeley and Sir George Carteret, and 2d, whether the grant from the Indians be sufficient to any planter of those petitions and addresses, and the sub- i without a grant from the King or his assigns. mission and resignation of their pretended " To ye first Question the authority by which rights to the late Lords Proprietors.2 And Coll. Nicolls acted Determined by ye Duke's they owned and agreed they were true, but Grant to ye Ld. Berkeley and Ld. George alleged that the same was done for fear. It was , Cartrett and all Grants made by him after- answered that the like allegation may ever be wards (though according to ye Commission) made, but as an evidence to the contrary, the I are void, for ye Delegated power wh Coll. Nic- petitioners themselves demonstrated, besides, that the patentees had, after the Lords Proprie- olls had of making grants of ye land could Last no Longer than his Maj" Intrest who tors' grace and favour granted them five hun- gave him yt Power, and ye having or not hav- dred Acres of Land apiece, they returned a ! ing Notice of ye Duke's Grant to ye Lord letter of acknowledgement and thanks. And their Associates, in compliance therewith, all patented their land according to the Concessions, none excepted, and continued ever after satisfied Berkeley & ST George Cartret makes no Differ- ence in ye Law, but ye want of Notice makes it great Equity yt ye Present Propriet" should Confirm Such Grants to ye People who will submit to ye Cons'sions and Payments of the Present Proprietors' Quitt rents, otherwise they may look upon them as Desseizors, and treat them as such." 3

1 The patentees and associates confidently believed that the Dutch occupation of 1673-74 had extinguished the King's title, and consequently that of the Duke of York and the proprietors under him, and that a decision to that effect would be had at Westminster Hall. In that case they (the patentees and settlers) believed they could safely rely on the fact of their nine years' possession, con- firmed by the Dutch, and promised to be confirmed by An- dros, as affording them a valid title. Some such donbts obtained with the Duke and the proprietors, and so, to make all sure, after the country had again passed to the English crown by right of conquest, in 1674, the royal and ducal grants were renewed and confirmed, as mentioned in a preceding chapter.

" At the date of this record the province was in the pos- session and under the government of the twenty-four proprietors.

In November, 1684, the twenty-four propri- etors, in a letter of instructions to Deputy-Gov- ernor Gawen Lawrie, empowered and directed him to join with five other proper persons in New Jersey " to end all Controversies and Differ- ences with the Men of Neversinks and Eliza- beth Town, or any other Planters or Persons whatsoever, concerning any pretended Titles or claim to Land in the said Province; And we

" N. J. Archives, 1st Series, vol. i. page 273.

HISTORY OF MONMOUTH COUNTY, NEW JERSEY.

do hereby declare that we will not enter into any Treaty on this side with any of those peo- ple who claim by Colonel Nicolls' Patent, nor with any others that challenge Land by any Patents from the late Governour Carteret, as being an Affront to the Government there, and of evil consequence to make Things to be put off by delays, and thereby hinder the settle- ment of our affairs in the Province."

The Monmouth patentees were beaten at all points in the matter of validity of title, and they and those claiming under them all took patents for their lands from the proprietors,1 though they eventually gained their paramount object, for they continued to hold their lands and avoided the payment of even the slight quit-rents which were required by the conces- sions. Neither Governor Lawrie, however, nor any of his successors succeeded in performing the duty with which he was charged, viz: "To end all Controversies and Differences with the Men of Neversinks and Elizabeth Town." They resisted the payment of the quit-rents, and, holding possession of the lands, they were too numerous to have a general eviction practi- cable, though a few were dispossessed. The controversy (which at times assumed, on the part of the people, much of the character of a revolt against the provincial government) was continued with more or less of intensity until closed by the War of the Revolution. But even that great convulsion did not extinguish the proprietary title. The Hon. A. Q. Keas- bey, in an address delivered before the Histori- cal Society of New Jersey on the bi-centennial anniversary of the purchase of East New Jer- sey by the twelve proprietors, said : "On the 1st of February, 1682, the deed was made and delivered, and twelve land speculators, headed by William Penn, became the sole owners in

In an answer made by the proprietors, December 9, 1700, to a remonstrance of the inhabitants of East Jersey, they say : " And ye Licenses granted to the Petrs hy Col. Nicolls then and by the Proprietrs since were ex- pressly under a condition to hold the Lands so purchased of the Proprietors by Patent, and a certain Rent ; and all Claiming under the License of Coll. Nicolls actually took Patents of the same Lands at certain Rents, as by the records thereof appears ; which ye Petis have artfully foreborne to mention, and rely wholly on the Indian title."

fee of all this fair domain, and from them must be traced the title to every lot and parcel of land which changes owners in East Jersey. And the direct successors of Penn and his eleven associates-still an organized body with active managing officers-own every acre of land which they have not sold ; and every pur- chaser who wants to buy can now make his bargain with them, as purchasers did two hun- dred years ago."

The next settlements in Monmouth County, after those of the Long Island and New Eng- land people at Middletown and Shrewsbury, and of a few others who came from other parts (among the most prominent of whom were Richard Hartshorne and Col. Lewis Morris) and who settled in the region contiguous to those places, were made by Scotch who began to come in the years 1682-83, as a result of the efforts made by Robert Barclay, of Scotland, to promote the emigration of his countrymen to East New Jersey, of which province he had then recently been appointed Governor under the proprietors. They made their settlements chiefly in Freehold township and along the northwestern border of the county2 adjoining Middlesex. Of the coming of these people to Monmouth County the Hon. Edwin Salter says : "About 1682-85 there were many refugee Scotch Quakers and Scotch Presbyte- rians who fled from persecution in Scotland, and located in East Jersey. Occasional de- srendants of the persecuted and banished Huguenots also came to this State ; among them it is said were the Bodines, Gaskells or Gaskins (originally Gascoyne), Dupuy, Soper and D'Aubigne, which latter was corrupted to Daw- been, and finally to Dobbins."

Among the first (as they were also the most prominent of the Scotch settlers in Monmouth county) were John Reid and George Keith, both of whom filled the office of surveyor- general of the province. Reid, who, during a period of nearly forty years, was one of the most widely-known and influential citizens of Monmouth County, was a Scotch Quaker, and was

2 Freehold township at that time extended to the Middle- sex County line.

EARLY SETTLEMENTS AND LAND TITLES.

employed in 1683 by Barclay and the other Scotch proprietors of East New Jersey as " over- seer," to have charge of a party of emigrants from Scotland, John Hanton was also em- ployed in the same capacity and at the same time, each to receive £25 sterling as an annual salary, and a "share" of ten acres of land at Ambo Point (Perth Amboy). On the 28th of Angust in the year mentioned, they sailed from Aberdeen with their families in the ship " Ex- change," Captain James Peacock, and on the 19th of December following were landed on Staten Island. Ilanton brought with him nine cows, two horses and one mare, six oxen and "two breeding sowes," and had the value of $144 68. 11d. in " provisions and necessaries." Reid had eight cows, two horses, six oxen, four swine and £147 2s. worth of " provisions and necessaries." Immediately after his arrival he went to Elizabethtown, thence to Woodbridge, and thenee, in January, 1683-84, to Perth Am- boy, where he took up his abode "in the field," in a house the buikling of which is mentioned in David Barelay's statement of account with the proprietors.

Soon after his arrival in New Jersey he was appointed deputy surveyor, and while engaged in that capacity made a map1 of lands on the Raritan, Rahway, Millstone and South Rivers, for which, and for other services, he received the grant of a tract of land named "Hortensia," located " on the east branch of Hop River in Monmouth County," to which tract he removed from Perth Amboy in the latter part of 1686. During the long period of his residence in this county he was several times elected a member of the General Assembly, and held other hon- orable positions, being appointed surveyor- General in the year of the surrender of the government by the proprietors to Queen Anne. While living at Perth Amboy he was clerk of Amboy Meeting of the Society of Friends, and he continued a member of that society after his removal to Monmouth County until the year 1703, when he adopted the faith of the Estab- lished Church of England. He died on the 16th of March, 1722-23, aged sixty-seven years,

and was interred in the old burial-ground of Topanemus, where a stone, still standing, marks his grave.2

George Keith was a native of Aberdeen, Scotland. In his early life he was a Presbyte- rian, which faith he abandoned to adopt that of the Society of Friends. In 1683 he was teacher of a school in Theobalds, having among his pupils a son of Robert Barclay, the proprietary Governor of East New Jersey. This fact, which, together with his Quakerism, brought him to favorable notice of the Governor, and the addi- tional fact that he was known to be " an excel- lent surveyor," secured for him the appointment of surveyor-general of East New Jersey, to which office he was commissioned August 8, 1684. He arrived at New York in the ship " Blossom," Martin, master, in the spring of

2 .. John Reid," says Mr. Whitehead, "appears to have been a bookseller in Edinburgh when selected by the pro- prietaries to take charge of a party of emigrants sent to East Jersey in 1683. A memorandum, written by himself, in the possession of his descendants, gives the following in- formation respecting himself and family. His father and grandfather before him were gardeners, and he was born at Mildrew Castle, in the parish of Kirkliston, on the 13th of February, 1655, and when twelve years old (1667) was bound apprentice to a wine merchant in Edinburgh. His master dying, he returned to his family in 1678, but his father being dead and his mother married again, be ' went to learn the art of gardening' the ensuing year, seeking improvement in the ' famous Hamilton Gardens.' At this time he became a Quaker. After sojourning a while at Drummond, he went, in 1676, to Lawres alias Fording, where he wrote a book entitled ' The Scotch Gardener,' and | in 1678 married Margaret, daughter of Henry Miller, of Cashon, in the parish of Kirkintiloch. She was eleven years bis senior. Previous to leaving Scotland for New Jersey three daughters-Anna, Helen and Margaret-were born to them. llis youngest daughter, yet an infant, died on -- the 15th of January, 1683-84, and was buried the next day, at l'erth Amboy, where his son John was afterwards born, in July, 1686. His daughter Anna married John Ander- son, who filled several important positions, and at the time of his death, in 1736, was President of the Council and Acting Governor of the province, in consequence of the death of Governor Cosby. One of their sons was named Kenneth. llis daughter llelen married the Rev. John Bartow, of Westchester, N. Y., and left several children. ITis only son, John. studied law in the office of John Cham- bers, one of the justices of the Supreme Court of the prov- ince of New York, and afterwards practiced at Westchester ; was surrogate of the county from 1760 to 1764 and died at Westchester aged eighty-seven."-New Jersey Archives, First Series, vol. i. p. 510.

1 An engraved copy of this map is now in possession of the New Jersey Historical Society.

IHISTORY OF MONMOUTH COUNTY, NEW JERSEY.

1685, and on the 9th of April reported to the Proprietary Couneil at Perth Amboy, where a house was assigned to him, but he was not sworn into his office until the 12th of June following. Not long afterwards he removed from Perth Amboy to lands which he had purchased in Freehold township, where he " made a fine plantation, which he afterwards sold and went into Pennsylvania."

His residence in Monmouth County was of about three years' duration, in which time (in 1687) he ran the province line between East and West New Jersey, as has already been men- The early Scotch settlers in New Jersey were nearly all landed at Perth Amboy, whenee they seattered in different directions, loeating in Monmouth, Middlesex and other counties. Thomas Lawrie and John Barclay, both Scoteh- men of some note, settled in 1684 very near the county line of Monmouth and Middlesex, but on which side of the boundary cannot now tioned. In 1689 he removed to Philadelphia at the invitation of the Quakers of that town, and there engaged in the teaching of a school, for which service he received the assurance of £50 for the first year and £120 yearly after- ward, with whatever profits might be real- ized from the school beyond that sum, but the children of the poor to receive tuition free. He be definitely ascertained. A number of Scotch however, continued in charge of the school only i people settled at the place which is now Mat- one year.

After his resignation of the position of teacher he became a leading Quaker preacher in Phila- delphia, but he was overbearing and aggressive, and created so much trouble among the Friends in Pennsylvania that he was publiely denouneed he abandoned the Quaker doctrines and adopted the faith of the Established Church of England, in which he soon attained considerable eminence as a clergyman.

as North Carolina, devoting most of his time and efforts, however, to the churches in New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania, in all of which, as is recorded, he was very successful in his ministrations, bringing in many of his for- mer co-religionists, the Quakers, as converts to the faith and discipline of the Established Church. At the conclusion of his labors in Virginia he returned thence to England, where he received a benefice, at £120 per annum, at Edburton, in the county of Sussex, and in this he continued during the remainder of his life.

awan, but which they named New Aberdeen. Nearly the whole northwest border of the county was first peopled by Scoteh Presbyte- rians.

In 1685 a large number of Covenanters, who had suffered the extreme of persecution for their

by the Meeting in 1692, and finally, in 1694, ; religious faith, were gathered in the prisons of Scotland, under sentence of banishment, because of their absolute refusal to take the oath of al- legianee as "embodied with the supremacy." Under these circumstances, George Scott, of Pitlochie, made application, asking that a ship- load of these unfortunates might be turned over to him, to be transported to East Jersey as servants in a colony which he intended to plant there. His request was granted, and he received a large number of the proscribed Cov- enanters, the story of whose sufferings during

In 1700, Keith was strongly recommended by Lewis Morris (in a memorial to the Bishop of London, concerning the religious condition of the people of New Jersey and other colonies) as the most suitable person to be sent here asa mis- sionary ; and in 1702 he came back to America in that capacity, under the auspices of the then re- cently established Society for the Propagation of | the voyage to America, and of the manner in the Gospel in Foreign Parts, to awaken in the which they were received on their arrival, is told in Chambers' " Domestie Annals of Scot- people of the provinces " a sense of the duties of Religion." He was the first missionary to the land," as follows: people of "Shrewsbury and the region round Pitlochie, who was himself a " vexed Pres- about," and of Freehold, of which church (St. byterian," being now in contemplation of a set- Peter's) he was the founder. He also traveled tlement in the colony of East Jersey and in want of laborers or bondmen for the eulture of as a missionary of the church through all the colonies from Massachusetts Bay as far south ; his lands, petitioned the Council for a eon-

EARLY SETTLEMENTS AND LAND TITLES.

signment of these tender-conscienced men, and nearly a hundred who had been condemned to banishment were at once "gifted" to him. Ile freighted a New Castle ship to carry them, and the vessel sailed from Leith Roads [September 5, 1685], carrying also with her cargo "dy- yours and broken men," besides the Covenant- ers. It was a most disastrous voyage. Partly, perhaps, because of the reduced, sickly state of most of the prisoners at starting, but more through a deficiency of healthful food and the want of air and comfort, a violent fever broke out in the ship before she had cleared Land's End. It soon assumed a malignant type, and scarcely an individual on board escaped it. The whole crew, except the captain and boat- swain, died. Pitlochie himself, and his wife, also, died. Three or four dead were thrown overboard every day. Notwithstanding this raging siekness, much severity was used towards the prisoners at sea by the master of the ship and others. Those under deck were not al- lowed to worship by themselves; and when they were engaged in it, the captain would throw down great planks of timber upon them to disturb them, and sometimes to the danger of their lives. Fifteen long weeks were spent at sea before the prison-ship arrived at her destination ; and in that time seventy had per- ished. The remainder were so reduced in strength as to be scarcely able to go ashore. The people at the place where they landed (Perth Amboy), not having the gospel among them, were indifferent to the fate of the Scot- tish Presbyterians; but at a place a few miles inland, where there was a minister and congre- gation, they were received with great kindness. They then became the subjects of a singular litigation ; a Mr. Johnston, the son-in-law and heir1 of Pitlochie, suing them for their value as bond-servants. A jury found that there was

no indenture between Pitlochie and them, but that they were shipped against their will; there- fore Mr. Johnston had no control over them.

At the time when these distressed people were landed at Perth Amboy, John Reid was living there; and being a Quaker, and taking an interest in his suffering countrymen, he prob- ably advised and assisted them to leave Amboy and go to the settlement of the Friends at To- panemns, which was doubtless the " place a few miles inland, where there was a minister and congregation," and where they were induced to remain as settlers, by reason of the "great kindness" which they received, and also by the attractiveness of the country. A few years later a Presbyterian Church was formed, and a house of worship erected about two miles north of the old Quaker Meeting-honse at Topanemus. This was the first Presbyterian Church edifice built in Monmouth County, and one of the first two or three in the province of New Jersey. Not a vestige of the old building now remains; but its site may still be known by a slight depression on a vacant spot in the " Old Scotch Burying-Ground," in Marlbor- ough township.

Between the Scotch and the English settlers in Monmouth County (as in other parts of the province) there sprang up a mutual jealousy and dislike, which became intensified into some- thing very much akin to hatred. The cause of this cannot, at this time, be clearly understood, but its existence-which, in no small degree, aggravated the disorders which disturbed the peace of the province in the last part of the seventeenth and the carlier years of the eigh- teenth century --- is clearly shown in the records of that time, from which a few pertinent ex- tracts are here given.

In a letter by Col. Robert Quary to the Lords of Trade, dated June 16, 1703, he said : " The contests of West Jersey have always been betwixt the Quakers and her majesty's subjects who are no Quakers. The

1 That this should read " one of the heirs." ete., is shown by the following extract from the minutes of a meeting of the Council at Perth Amboy, October 30, 1686, viz. : "James contest in East Jersey is of a different nature, Scott, sonn of George Scott, of picklorkey [Pitlochie], late -whether the Country shall be a Scotch settle- ment or an English settlement. The Scotch have had for many years the advantage of a Scotch Governour, Colonel Andrew Hamilton. of the Kingdom of Scotland, Deceased, came before this Councill, being a Minor, aud made choyse of m' John Johnstone and m' George Willox to bee his Guardians,- who were admitted accordingly."

HISTORY OF MONMOUTH COUNTY, NEW JERSEY.

But it is the expectation of all that his Exeel- leney, My Lord Cornbury, will reconcile all these differenees." That expectation, however, was not verified.

In a memorial of that time, by Edward Ran- dolph (N. Y. Col. Docs., vol. ii. p. 122), he said : " Mr. Andrew Hamilton, a Scotchman, is the Gov of those Provinces. Appointed by the Proprietors to lease out their Lands and receive their Quit-Rents. Heis a great favourer of the Scotch Traders, his Countrymen."

The proprietors of East Jersey, in a memorial to the Lords of Trade, asking for the appoint- ment of Peter Sonmans as councillor in place of Lewis Morris, said : " Yet some of the un- ruly Scots and those of their faction (abetted by their Ring-leader1) in New Jersey, who are the correspondents and informers of the Me- morialists here against the Lord Cornbury, op- posed Mr. Sonmans' commission there, etc."

Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.

History of Monmouth county, New Jersey, Part 15

Author: Ellis, Franklin, 1828-1885; Swan, Norma Lippincott. [from old catalog] Publication date: 1885 Publisher: Philadelphia, R. T. Peck & co. Number of Pages: 1148

Author: Ellis, Franklin, 1828-1885; Swan, Norma Lippincott. [from old catalog]
Publication date: 1885
Publisher: Philadelphia, R. T. Peck & co.
Number of Pages: 1148