History of the city of Washington and Washington County, Pennsylvania and representative citizens 20th century, Part 35

Author: McFarland, Joseph Fulton; Richmond-Arnold Pub. Co., Chicago, pub
Publication date: 1910
Publisher: Chicago, Richmond-Arnold Pub. Co.
Number of Pages: 1474


USA > Pennsylvania > Washington County > Washington > History of the city of Washington and Washington County, Pennsylvania and representative citizens 20th century > Part 35


Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).


Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45 | Part 46 | Part 47 | Part 48 | Part 49 | Part 50 | Part 51 | Part 52 | Part 53 | Part 54 | Part 55 | Part 56 | Part 57 | Part 58 | Part 59 | Part 60 | Part 61 | Part 62 | Part 63 | Part 64 | Part 65 | Part 66 | Part 67 | Part 68 | Part 69 | Part 70 | Part 71 | Part 72 | Part 73 | Part 74 | Part 75 | Part 76 | Part 77 | Part 78 | Part 79 | Part 80 | Part 81 | Part 82 | Part 83 | Part 84 | Part 85 | Part 86 | Part 87 | Part 88 | Part 89 | Part 90 | Part 91 | Part 92 | Part 93 | Part 94 | Part 95 | Part 96 | Part 97 | Part 98 | Part 99 | Part 100 | Part 101 | Part 102 | Part 103 | Part 104 | Part 105 | Part 106 | Part 107 | Part 108 | Part 109 | Part 110 | Part 111 | Part 112 | Part 113 | Part 114 | Part 115 | Part 116 | Part 117 | Part 118 | Part 119 | Part 120 | Part 121 | Part 122 | Part 123 | Part 124 | Part 125 | Part 126 | Part 127 | Part 128 | Part 129 | Part 130 | Part 131 | Part 132 | Part 133 | Part 134 | Part 135 | Part 136 | Part 137 | Part 138 | Part 139 | Part 140 | Part 141 | Part 142 | Part 143 | Part 144 | Part 145 | Part 146 | Part 147 | Part 148 | Part 149 | Part 150 | Part 151 | Part 152 | Part 153 | Part 154 | Part 155 | Part 156 | Part 157 | Part 158 | Part 159 | Part 160 | Part 161 | Part 162 | Part 163 | Part 164 | Part 165 | Part 166 | Part 167 | Part 168 | Part 169 | Part 170 | Part 171 | Part 172 | Part 173 | Part 174 | Part 175 | Part 176 | Part 177 | Part 178 | Part 179 | Part 180 | Part 181 | Part 182 | Part 183 | Part 184 | Part 185 | Part 186 | Part 187 | Part 188 | Part 189 | Part 190 | Part 191 | Part 192 | Part 193 | Part 194 | Part 195 | Part 196 | Part 197 | Part 198 | Part 199 | Part 200 | Part 201 | Part 202 | Part 203 | Part 204 | Part 205 | Part 206 | Part 207 | Part 208 | Part 209 | Part 210 | Part 211 | Part 212 | Part 213 | Part 214 | Part 215 | Part 216 | Part 217 | Part 218 | Part 219 | Part 220 | Part 221 | Part 222 | Part 223 | Part 224 | Part 225 | Part 226


The Union Literary Society and the Washington be- gan in 1809 and 1814 respectively in Washington.


At the consolidation in 1865-9 the Franklin and Wash- ington united and the Philo and Union also became one.


The annual contests have been always of great interest to the student body and an attraction and high enter- tainment for the general public. The audience room was until recent years filled to overflowing and the excite- ment, especially on the announcement of victory, was equal to that seen only of late on the athletic field.


There has been a decrease of interest as well as in attendance in recent years, both in the membership and attendance in these societies and in attendance at the contests. The privilege and high opportunities offered in the field of discussion and oratory are overshadowed by the excitements caused by the display of muscle.


In those days to win in a debate or contest was almost a greater satisfaction than to be honor man of one's class-the one was winning for others and having the whole society rejoice with you, the latter bore a taint of selfishness.


A little picture of history combining college politics, contests, slavery and rumblings of war is given by J. M. McElroy, a Jefferson student of the fifties, repro- duced from the Canonsburg Notes:


"The South had but few colleges. Young men of wealthy families were sent North to be educated,-to Princeton, Yale, Jefferson, Oxford and Hanover. At Jefferson College in 1850 we had about 200 Northern stu- dents, with perhaps 50 from the South.


"The politics of that day was undergoing a trans- formation; from tariff and finance to freedom and slavery, constitutional rights and humanity. The com- promise measures then before congress were discussed at great length and with excited feeling.


"Our college faculty and the great mass of the stu- dents were conservative, not in favor of slavery, and still less favorable to radical abolition. The Southern boys, however, took great interest in the discussions going on at Washington. In platform required performance and in debate in the literary societies they brought the slavery question forward at every opportunity. Extracts from the speeches of Clay, Foote, Toombs, Butler and Jeffer- son Davis were declaimed with extravagant emphasis and we listened quietly.


"But when an Ohio boy undertook to declaim a speech


of Horace Mann, he was interrupted and hissed and threatened. Walking with a Missouri classmate toward 'the recitation room he was told. 'If I had had a rock I would have knocked you off that platform!'


"In the Franklin Literary Society we had a consider- able list of honorary members, eminent statesmen, schol- ars, orators, who had usually been elected by unanimous vote. The members from the South were disposed to press the names of their fire-eating Southerners as hon- orary members. One of them proposed Col. A. W. Atchi- son, of Missouri, resting his claim on the fact that he was the opponent of that 'old traitor, Tom Benton.' Some words of moderate protest were uttered, but Atchi- son was elected. When the next time came for electing honorary members it was found that the first name on the list was Horace Mann's, followed by five Southerners. Mann's election was violently opposed, Missouri fairly railed at him. Maryland asked, 'Would you vote for a man who you know was wanting to cut your throat?' North Carolina replied. 'That would depend on whether I had the blues or not.'


"Ohio defended Mann. He was a distinguished scholar and orator and as an educator stood in the front rank. True, he is opposed to slavery, but he is not as ultra as many others. Men's views on that question ought not to enter into their fitness for honorary mem- bership. If it can be shown that he does not possess the higher character and attainments that have all along been considered essential, his name will be withdrawn. If he is voted down because of his views on slavery, then take notice that some others may be voted down be- cause of their views.


"Virginia responded wrathfully and excitedly in the person of a sophomore by the name of Brown: 'Mr. President, I would just as leave vote for the devil as Horace Mann!' Ohio responded, 'that may be so. Peo- ple's tastes differ ; it may be that the Virginia gentleman and Old Nick are on especially intimate terms! You can vote down Horace Mann if you choose to do so. Only six negative votes are required to debar his election. But if you do so, merely because he is an anti-slavery man, then you may understand that no slaveholder need be proposed for such position. We will vote down every man of them.' And that was the result.


"At the same meeting the society elected by ballot, as was the regular custom, two members for select debate. They were to choose their own question and have six weeks for preparation. Brown, of Virginia, and the writer of these lines were chosen. Our question was, 'Is it right for citizens of the United States to assist fugitive slaves in escaping their masters?'


"We had a very attentive audience, including M. S. Quay, Bishop MeLoren and a hundred others. The de- bater on the affirmative did not contend that assisting fugitive slaves was any real and adequate remedy for slavery. He did not deny the constitutional obligation to refrain from any legislation to interfere with the re- claiming of fugitives. But that there were cases in which it was not only right but a duty to feed the hungry and clothe the naked and guide the traveler toward Canada, even though the man were black and somebody claimed him as a slave. That the slave was under no moral obligation to stay with his master, because he had never agreed to do so. That the laws of the South re- garded him as a piece of property, and that as such it was no more wrong for him to run away than for a cow or mule to do so.


The debater on the negative was too angry and too


195


HISTORY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY


much excited to do the subject justice. He did not attempt to follow and answer the arguments presented. He could little more than rave and gesticulate. He and the other younger men from the South were very much in the frame of mind in which the John Brown raid found the Virginians nine years later. Bloody insur- rection and upheaval of society from the very founda- tions was the specter before them. They were impulsive, and ever ready for a fight. More than once the oppor- tunity of declining a fisticuff argument with them pre- sented itself. And yet there was a frankness and mag- nanimity with them that was pleasing. Maryland came to me afterward privately and apologized and said if you will bring up Horace Mann's name again, I will vote for him. The Missourian who wanted to knock me off the platform, afterwards said to me, 'You fellows weren't brought up like we were. From childhood we were taught to fight. When I was a little boy, if anything displeased me, the fellows would gather around me and say, "Go for him! Fight him! Give it to him!" "No, Tom," I replied, "I was not brought up that way. I never had a fight in my life and never expect to, unless some- body attacks me. I never saw a fight at home or among my schoolmates. My parents taught me that fighting was to be avoided, just as swearing and lying, "' '


"Among themselves they practised the manly art of violence. But they did not give it the name of pugilism. . A son of Gov. Brandon, of Mississippi, made a gratuitous attack upon a very gentlemanly and exemplary classmate from Missouri. He met with a surprising response that sent him reeling to the floor. A rough Kentuckian made a murderous attack on a Mr. Shaw, of Maryland, for which he had to go into hiding and make his escape in the night to avoid criminal prosecution. That same Shaw was torn to pieces fifteen years later by a Mary- land mob. He was editor and proprietor of a weekly paper which indorsed and gloried in the assassination of President Lincoln, and the enraged populace, without judge or jury, put an end to his career.


"About sixty of my college associates took part in the War of the Rebellion, three-fourths of them in the Union army and about one-fourth with the Confederates, and a majority of them as commissioned officers. Several Southern young men fought in the Union army, and a still larger number of Northern men were in the rebel army. Two of these had settled in Texas. They were enlisted. They fought and marched with their associates all the way to the Potomac and Gettysburg, there to fall and find burial in their native state.


"The most distinguished of our number was Gen. Bristow, of Kentucky, Secretary of the Treasury under President Grant.


"The most widely known of the Confederates were Col. Greene, of North Carolina, and Col. Tom Giffin, of Mis- sissippi. The latter was one of the irreconcilables who refused to accept the verdict of Appomattox and who migrated to South America.


"I have denominated this college politics. It was not ordinary politics. It was not a contest between the Democratic and the Whig party, nor between the Demo- crats and the Republicans, for the Republican party was not then in existence. It was slavery and freedom, Union and disunion-the early mutterings of the 'irrepressible conflict.' ">


Some idea of the greatness of this college is had when one learns that there have been in all 4,500 graduates.


Many others had their ambition stimulated by a partial course. Of these 1,700 were ministers, among the most prominent of whom are Rev. David Gregg, president of the Western Theological Seminary, Allegheny City; Rev. S. B. McCormick, Chancellor of the University of Pitts- burg; Rev. J. H. Corbett, moderator of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church; Rev. J. Ross Stevenson, a Washington County boy, now occupying prominent pulpits in New York and Baltimore.


Five hundred physicians, 6 cabinet ministers, 12 gov- ernors, 12 United States senators, 66 congressmen, 230 legislators, 120 judges of the county courts, 20 judges of state supreme courts, 32 college and university presi- dents and 32 moderators of the Presbyterian and United Presbyterian general assemblies have passed through Washington and Jefferson College. Still there are more to follow. Its students are of later years found all over the United States prominent in private life. One of the foremost of these is Josiah V. Thompson, banker and the most prominent coal land purchaser in America.


Washington and Jefferson College has sent out 110 mis- sionaries, among whom were John Calvin Mater, of China; Rev. J. C. Ray Ewing, a leading educator in India, and his brother, Rev. Arthur H. Ewing, of Alla- habad.


There have been 1,100 lawyers. David T. Watson, of Pittsburg, born in Washington, Pa., is probably the most eminent lawyer of the country today and in the city of Pittsburg alone there are six judges. Senator E. E. Robbins, of Greensburg, is another distinguished lawyer. The most eminently distinguished statesman and one of the greatest men ever graduated from the college was Hon. James G. Blaine, who was once nomi- nated for President of the United States.


As early as 1867 baseball clubs were organized at Washington College. In that year the first regular college representative team, which in these modern days would be known as a varsity nine, was placed in the field. It was known as the Union Baseball Club of Washington College and was composed of 44 members. Jefferson College at Canonsburg also maintained several baseball clubs and since the rivalry between the two institutions before the war was intense, some very heated games were played between representative teams. One of the most noted college teams of the early days of baseball was that of 1875. The students leased the fair grounds as a ball field from Selden L. Wilson, Esq. The college teams continued to take honors until in the late 'nineties the college secured the reputation of turn- ing out the best baseball teams in three states. While baseball was advancing, interest in other sports did not lag. Football early was taken up by Washington and Jefferson College and in 1890 the first varsity football


196


HISTORY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY


eleven was launched at that institution. From the start Washington and Jefferson placed in the field champion- ship teams. Rivals were defeated with great regularity and the fame of the college team spread abroad. The advance in football was continuous to 1906 and 1907 when signal defeats administered to rival institutions established the institution as the collegiate champion of Western Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia, which titles Washington and Jefferson now holds. In recent years other forms of sport growing out of the early desire for competition have been taken up and have pros- pered. Basketball and field sports of various kinds have been conducted with great success at Washington and Jefferson College owing to the fine gymnasium. The ancient feud between the college student and the town boys has disappeared, and the town folk are brought in closer sympathy with the students because of the annual football games.


WASHINGTON AND JEFFERSON ACADEMY.


In 1787 Washington Academy was founded at Wash- ington, Pa. A charter bearing the date September 24, 1787, was obtained, and in 1787 the Academy was put into operation under the principalship of the Rev. Thad- deus Dodd. The court house, in the upper rooms of which the Academy was conducted, being burned about 1790, the Academy was suspended for a time, but later was reopened. In 1793 there was erected for the use of the Academy the stone building which now stands on the campus of Washington and Jefferson College. The Washington Academy was chartered as Washington Col- lege March 28, 1806. Thereafter Washington College, and later Washington and Jefferson College, conducted a department preparatory to college classes. The trus- tees of Washington and Jefferson College in 1899 pur- chased from the school board of Washington borough a large building for the exclusive use of the preparatory department. The location was that of the original Union School of the Borough. In December, 1900, they added to it the large property situated at the corner of Beau and College streets, for many years the home of Hon. William Hopkins and family. The old homestead was torn down and the erection of a fire-proof dormitory and boarding hall was begun at once, costing $76,000, which was ready for the use of the new Washington and Jefferson Academy at the opening of the winter term, 1902. The dormitory and boarding hall has been named Hays Hall, in honor of the memory of Rev. Dr. George P. Hays, deceased, the first permanent president after its removal to Washington.


The school building contains the study room, recitation rooms, the physical laboratory, work shop and the prin- cipal's office. The department, under the name of Wash- ington and Jefferson Academy, is under the general


control of the trustees and faculty of the college, and is conducted as a constituent part of the college, having: access to the college gymnasium and baths. Its object is to give students a thorough preparation for admission to the freshman class of Washington and Jefferson Col- lege, or of any other of the higher classical colleges or scientific schools. James N. Rule has been principal of the Academy almost from its opening in new quarters in 1902 and has succeeded most admirably, being well cal- culated to lead and develop youth. He has eight as- sistants.


What was formerly only a preparatory department, in- struction being given by the college professors in the afternoon, has now become a first-class academy with its own buildings, its own principal and corps of teach- ers, with courses of study lengthened from two years to. four years. Instead of allowing boys to take such care of themselves as they might see fit, with all the liberty of the older college students, the splendid new dormitory was erected and furnished at an expense exceeding $100,000, where 60 boys can be comfortably housed and boarded in company with their instructors.


JEFFERSON ACADEMY, CANONSBURG.


Jefferson Academy was chartered in 1869, but not organized and opened until 1872. However, in 1869, 1870 and 1871 an unchartered academy was conducted here by Messrs. James Dickson and James Dunbar. Dunbar was a son of John Dunbar, of Smith Township. This school was opened and for a time conducted in the building formerly occupied by the Olome Institute which stood on the ground now covered by the First Presby- terian Church, on North Central avenue. Later it was removed to the old Jefferson College building. Messrs. Dickson and Dunbar were bright men, and up-to-date in their ideas of school work, and they conducted an excel- lent school, which was largely patronized. After some three years Professor Dunbar's health failed. He was. compelled to seek a milder climate, and the school was closed.


History informs us that Jefferson Academy was char- tered in 1869, and organized in 1872, with the following- board of directors: Rev. William Smith, D. D., David C. Houston, John Hays, William G. Barnett, M. D.,. John W. Martin, M. D., J. W. Alexander, M. D., and J. Nevin Brown. The Rev. William Ewing, Ph. D., was the first principal. Dr. Ewing associated with him as. teacher Dr. W. F. Brown. The school in the years dur- ing which Dr. Ewing was principal enjoyed a large patronage, and took high rank among schools of its. class.


After having conducted the school successfully for more than ten years Dr. Ewing resigned. Dr. W. F. Brown was elected principal, accepted and continued


A


DORMITORY


ACADEMY


LIBRARY


OLD COLLEGE


I


PREPARATORY SCHOOL


COLLEGE


-


GENERAL VIEW WASHINGTON AND JEFFERSON COLLEGE, WASHINGTON


199


HISTORY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY


in charge of the school for several years. Under Dr. Brown's administration there was a large attendance of students, good work was done, and the school flour- ished. Finally, owing to the serious illness of his wife, Dr. Brown resigned. He was succeeded by Dr. Des Islets and he by Prof. Phillips, who lived but a short time after taking charge.


Prof. Anderson, of Wheeling, succeeded Prof. Phillips. He was in charge of the school two years.


R. H. Meloy succeeded Prof. Phillips, having for his assistant W. D. Inglis, now Dr. Inglis, of Columbus, O. Prof. Meloy remained in charge of the school several years and did good work, but left to engage in practice of law in Washington. He was followed by Prof. Harry Irwin, also an accomplished scholar, and successful teacher.


Rev. J. A. A. Craig, of Claysville, was next in line for the principalship. He proved to have greater stay- ing qualities than a number of his predecessors. For a time he had associated with him as assistant principal J. K. Lacock, and now has for assistant Prof. W. W. Highberger. Mrs. Laura Craig is also a s successful teacher in the school. Prof. Craig has now been in charge of the school for eight years, and during that time a large number of young men and women have been enrolled as students, and have gone out, many of them to fill places of large usefulness. The present en- rollment of the school is over 50.


The grounds occupied were formerly owned by Jeffer- son College and the buildings are the same as when the college organization was removed from Canonsburg. Old Fort Job has disappeared from the lot it formerly oc- cupied about two squares away and a handsome private dwelling occupies its place. The old college chapel is still used for church services and is in charge of the Central Presbyterian Congregation. The library room on the third floor has quite a large number of valuable books, many of which were retained by the loyalty of the Canonsburg people whose love for the old college re- fused to let them be carried off.


WASHINGTON SEMINARY.


The origin of the Washington Seminary can be dated to the 26th of November, 1835, when the following citi- zens of Washington met at the house of T. M. T. Me- Kennan, Esq., to take the initiatory movement toward organizing a female seminary in Washington: Rev. David Elliott, John Harter, John Wilson, James Reed, William J. Wilson, William Hunter, Jacob Slagle, Robert Officer, William Smith, David Eckert and John Koontz. A second and much larger meeting was held shortly afterward. Among those who were then present and others who later proved their devotion to the enterprise were Alexander Reed, Dr. F. J. LeMoyne, Thomas Mor-


gan, Samuel Mount, Samuel McFarland, John Grayson, John H. Ewing, James Brice, John K. Wilson, Dr. James Stevens, Alexander Ramsey, James Ruple, Alexander Sweeney, William Sample, James McCadden, John Mar- shel, Samuel Hazlet, Dr. John Wishart, Dr. Robert R. Reed, John L. Gow, Robert Wylie, Colin M. Reed, John S. Brady, Hon. Abraham Wotring, Rev. Thomas Hanna, Thomas McKean, Vachel Harding and others, all of whom subscribed for stock in the institution and assisted in getting it started.


A committee consisting of Jacob Slagle, John Koontz and David Eckert were appointed to find a suitable place for opening the seminary in the following spring, and having reported in favor of the Old Masonic Hall on West Maiden street, now owned by Dr. W. D. Tea- garden, were instructed to secure the same. A second committee consisting of T. M. T. McKennan, William Hunter, John Harter, Dr. F. J. LeMoyne and Thomas Morgan were authorized to confer with Alexander Reed, Esq., on the prospect of purchasing lots for the erection of a seminary building on East Maiden street. The lots in question were promptly sold by Mr. Reed.


By the 18th of December, 1835, 85 shares of the Seminary stock had been sold, bringing a sum of $4,250 into the treasury. The committee on securing teachers reported that they had secured Mrs. Francis Biddle to take charge of the school, and had given her authority to select an assistant. Her stipulated salary was $600, "clear of rent, fuel, furniture and incidental expenses." It is singular to note that the trustees also resolved that all excess over $600, derived from tuition, and the pay- ment of all incidental expenses, should be paid to Mrs. Biddle in addition to her salary.


On the 14th of February, 1837, the stockholders adopt- ed a new constitution, having in view the necessity of procuring an act of incorporation from the Legislature. The constitution contained the provisions and restrictions under which the seminary is still conducted. On March 1, 1838, the trustees signed a memorial to the state legislature, asking an appropriation of $500 per annum for five years, which was granted with a charter April 14, 1838.


At a meeting of the trustees held in 1840, it being taken into consideration that there had been a very great increase in the number of pupils attending and that the school was in a very healthy state. The board determined that it was both expedient and necessary to erect new buildings. In 1846 it was found necessary again to enlarge, and a wing was added to the main building which had been built. On the last of November, 1848, the school experienced its first disaster, a fire having destroyed the west wing buildings. The structures were not covered by insurance and it was only by borrowing money, together with stock subscriptions that the build-


200


HISTORY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY


ing committee was enabled to quickly replace the dam- aged portion.


At the end of her fourth year in the seminary, Mrs. Biddle had resigned, and Miss Sarah R. Foster, then a teacher at Cadiz, O., and formerly a pupil of Mrs. Emma Willard at Troy, N. Y., was chosen as her successor. In 1848 she was married to the Rev. Thomas Hanna, who had become pastor of what is now the First United Presbyterian Church of Washington, and in 1850, he was appointed by the trustees of the seminary as superin- tendent of that institution.


Under the administration of Mrs. Hanna, the school was conducted with wisdom and success until 1874, when, finding the duties of the now greatly enlarged attend- ance too severe for her years, she relinquished the office of principal. After careful inquiry and extensive corre- spondence relative to the affair, the board of trustees chose Miss Nancy Sherrard, at that time vice-principal of the seminary at Steubenville, under the Rev. A. M. Reid, Ph. D., principal. She entered upon her duties at the beginning of the next year, September, 1874, pre- ceded by a reputation for great energy and wisdom in ! conducting a school and in the management of young women. For 23 years Miss Sherrard served as head of the seminary, and in that time the name of the school became each year more widely known, and its prosperity more marked. A large number of girls passed several years under her care.


In 1896 Miss Sherrard retired from her labors, and Mrs. Martha Nichols McMillan accepted the position. It was during the principalship of Mrs. McMillan that the new building fronting on Lincoln street was built. Mrs. McMillan left the school in 1901, when Miss Thomp- son and Miss McDonald became the co-principals.




Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.