Town of Tewksbury annual report 1956-1962, Part 92

Author: Tewksbury (Mass.)
Publication date: 1956
Publisher: Tewksbury (Mass.)
Number of Pages: 1502


USA > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Tewksbury > Town of Tewksbury annual report 1956-1962 > Part 92


Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).


Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45 | Part 46 | Part 47 | Part 48 | Part 49 | Part 50 | Part 51 | Part 52 | Part 53 | Part 54 | Part 55 | Part 56 | Part 57 | Part 58 | Part 59 | Part 60 | Part 61 | Part 62 | Part 63 | Part 64 | Part 65 | Part 66 | Part 67 | Part 68 | Part 69 | Part 70 | Part 71 | Part 72 | Part 73 | Part 74 | Part 75 | Part 76 | Part 77 | Part 78 | Part 79 | Part 80 | Part 81 | Part 82 | Part 83 | Part 84 | Part 85 | Part 86 | Part 87 | Part 88 | Part 89 | Part 90 | Part 91 | Part 92 | Part 93 | Part 94 | Part 95 | Part 96 | Part 97


ART. 23. To see if the Town will vote to expend the sum of $6,650.00 from the Installation Account, for the purpose of in- stalling approximately 1900 feet of water pipe in Kittredge Drive, provided that cost of said installation has been first deposited with the Town Treasurer and applied to estimated receipts and to authorize the Water Commissioners to do such work and expend such money, or take any action in relation thereto. JOSEPH A. AUBUT


ART. 24. To see if the Town will vote to expend the sum of $2,275.00 from the Installation Account, for the purpose of in- stalling approximately 650 feet of water pipe in Drury Lane, provided that cost of said installation has been first deposited with the Town Treasurer and applied to estimated receipts and to authorize the Water Commissioners to do such work and expend such money, or take any action in relation thereto. JOSEPH A. AUBUT


ART. 25. To see if the Town will vote to expend the sum of $1,225.00 from the Installation Account, for the purpose of in- stalling approximately 350 feet of water pipe in Delwood Road, provided that cost of said installation has been first deposited with the Town Treasurer and applied to estimated receipts and to authorize the Water Commissioners to do such work and expend such money, or take any action in relation thereto. JAMES DeCAROLIS


ART. 26. To see if the Town will vote to expend the sum of $1,750.00 from the Installation Account, for the purpose of in- stalling approximately 350 feet of water pipe in Pringle Street, provided that cost of said installation has been first deposited with the Town Treasurer and applied to estimated receipts and to authorize the Water Commissioners to do such work and expend such money, or take any action in relation thereto. JAMES DeCAROLIS


66


ART. 27. To see if the Town will vote to change the Grade of Senior Clerk Typist, in the Water Department, from Grade 3 to Grade 4, after a promotional Civil Service examination has been taken and approved, to take effect January 1st, 1963, or take any action in relation thereto.


ART. 28. To see if the Town will vote to further amend the Per- sonnel By-Law, under Section 3 of the Classification and Wage Plan, Paragraph H, by adding the following classification under Grade 11 after the Grade of Motor Repairman "Water Fore- man," or take any action in relation thereto.


TOWN AUDITOR


ART. 29. To see if the Town will vote to transfer the sum of $720.00 from E&D to the Auditor's Salary Account or take any other action relative thereto. TOWN AUDITOR


ART. 30. To see if the Town will vote to amend the Town By- Laws by changing the date of the Annual Town Meeting to 8:00 P. M. on the first Wednesday in March.


BOARD OF SELECTMEN


The quorum was questioned at this time, found lacking, and the Meeting was adjourned sine die at 10:16 P. M. Articles 14 through 20 and 22 through 30 were thusly not acted upon.


A true copy, Attest. JOHN E. HEDSTROM


Town Clerk


67


JURORS DRAWN 1962


Joseph W. Byron, 634 Chandler Street Navy Yard


Doris Farwell, 15 Amos Street Housewife


Ethel M. Anderson, 24 Pleasant Street Housewife


Patrick Griffin, 5 Revere Road Postal Clerk


Leonard Fleming, 2 Herbert Street Postal Clerk


William Sweeney, 12 Appletree Road Sail Maker


Venerio Baldacci, 66 Patten Road Shipper


Joseph Munroe, 820 East Street Insurance Adjustor


Harry Youney, 56 Patten Road Iron Worker


John L. Donoghue, 10 Armistice Road Warehouseman


Denis DeDeo, 10 Jay Street Plumber


Richard Fales, 62 James Street Sales Super.


Philip Campbell, 18 Chester Street Mailman


Richard Mitchell, 51 Mystic Street Truckdriver


Herbert Fairbrother, 93 Lee Street


Retired


Harry Treadwell, 74 Summer Street Retired


Adelbert Anderson, 204 Chapman Street Farmer


Howard E. Nichols, Tewksbury Hospital Attendant


David J. Beattie, 29 Marie Street


Sales


Esther O'Connell, 142 North Street Telephone Operator


Domenic Ciccolella, 318 Brown Street Electrician


Grace Hannigan, 202 Astle Street Housekeeper


John Collins, 465 North Street Patrolman


Alice A. Pike, 464 Main Street Retired


Anthony Moccia, 10 Davis Road Elec. Tech.


68


TEWKSBURY ADVISORY AIRPORT COMMISSION


Pursuant to Article 85 on the warrant for the 1962 annual town meeting an "Advisory Airport Commission," consisting of three members, was established. Named to this commission were Mr. Richard J. Sherman, Mr. Leonard Anderson, and Mr. Alan S. Hunter, Chairman.


The course of action adopted by this Commission was the following:


1. Establish the need for a Municipal Airport


a. Projected Utilization


b. Size of Aircraft which would use facilities


c. Projected annual increase in traffic volume


2. Airport Planning


a. Financial Considerations


b. General runway layout


c. Inter-Action of Bedford and Lawrence facilities with proposed Tewksbury facilities


3. Submission of final report and recommendation to the town. Relative to Item 1 letters were sent to the larger industrial firms in the area to determine their possible utilization. They were requested to answer the follow- ing questions:


1. Do you operate a company plane?


2. If so, what type (make, model)?


3. How many take-offs and landings were performed in the past year with this aircraft (at its home base)?


4. What would you predict for (3) five years from now?


The replies to these questionaires were generally disheartening insofar as a municipal airport for Tewksbury is concerned Most of the companies answering indicated that they did not own and operate a company airplane. Those who said that they did not have company aircraft also indicated that they would not expect to employ company aircraft in their business within the next five years.


With regard to item 2, the Federal Airport Act (60 Stat. 170, as amended) authorizes the Federal Aviation Agency to administer a grant-in-aid program to assist public agencies in the development of a nationwide system of public airports "adequate to meet the needs of civil aviation". This program is generally known as the Federal-Aid Airport Program Financial assistance under this program is available only to public agencies such as states, counties,


69


municipalities and other political subdivisions and agencies. Fed- eral grants under the Act are on a matching fund basis with the Federal Government generally providing 50 percent of the cost of the airport development, and the local public agency the other 50 percent. Part 550 of the FAA Administrator's Regulations sets forth FAA programming policies and standards in administering the provisions of the Federal Airport Act.


Additional matching funds in the order of 25 percent, are available from the State of Massachusetts. The cost to the Town of Tewksbury for the establishment of a municipal airport will amount to 25 percent of the total sum. Massachusetts General Laws pertaining to airport establishment and operation are as follows:


1. Approach regulations (C90; SS40A to 40F)


2. Lease by Airport Commission for a period more than 20 years (C90; SS51F)


3. Joint appropriation with other towns (C90; SS51D, 51G, and 51N)


4. Regulations pertaining to the establishment and main- tainance of an airport (C90; SS51D, 51F, 51G, and 51N)


If however, a community desires to develop an airport without the use of Federal Funds, such action is provided for by the pro- visions of Part 625 of the Regulations of the FAA Administrator. Part 625 is based upon provisions of Section 309 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 751) Part 625 sets forth require- ments in respect to giving reasonable prior notice to the FAA Administrator about the proposed establishment of a landing area. These requirements enable the FAA to advise as to the effects of such action on the use of airspace by aircraft. Notice under pro- visions of Part 625 should be given to the FAA District Airport Engineer.


Part 550 and Part 625 of the FAA Administrator's Regulations are published in Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations which also contain all other FAA regulations pertaining to civil aviation.


The forms referred to in the above paragraphs have been obtained and have been submitted to the Board of Selectmen along with this report.


Consultation with the Chief Inspector for the Mass. Aeronautics Commission has indicated that the present Tewksbury airport is the best of several possible locations in the town. The above loca- tion will permit a main runway length of up to approximately 3500 feet with the possibility of a shorter cross runway.


The current Tewksbury airport's proximity to both the Greater


70


Lawrence Municipal Airport and the Hanscom Field, Bedford Airport precludes the use of the Tewksbury facility as an all- weather airport. This occurs since Hanscom Field is equipped with full all-weather landing facilities. Lawrence has some equipment whose use is coordinated with the Bedford facilities. A third facility, such as Tewksbury would prove confusing since adequate separation from the other two facilities could not be attained.


Through discussions with the current Tewksbury (Tewmack) Airport owner/operator it has been indicated that extensive im- provements to this airport are planned. Extension of the current runway, possible addition of a cross-runway, and general improve- ment to the current facilities are planned.


In full consideration of the above factors, it is the recommen- dation of the Tewksbury Advisory Airport Commission that the establishment of a municipal airport in Tewksbury not be pursued at this time for the following reasons.


1. The current and projected use of such an airport by company owned and operated aircraft does not warrant such an endeavor.


2. The close proximity of such a municipal airport in Tewksbury to those in Bedford and Lawrence does not permit all-weather operations.


3. The cost to the town for such a facility in relation to the expected return indicates that it would be a deficit operation for several years.


4. Improvement of the existing airport by the current owner/operator should satisfy the immediate and pro- jected needs of the Town.


71


BOARD OF ASSESSORS Austin F. French, Chairman


Value of Real Estate January 1, 1962 $13,516,600.00


Value of Personal Property 3,520,600.00


Total Value of 1962


$17,037,200.00


Total Value of 1961


16,390,095.00


Gain in Valuation


$ 647,105.00


TOTAL LEVY FOR 1962


Town


$ 2,683,986.69


State


9,776.32


County


32,695.90


Overlay Current Year


85,064.66


Gross Amount to be Raised


$ 2,811,523.57


Total Estimated Receipts and


Available Funds


$ 1,168,452.37


Net Amount to be Raised on Polls and Property


$ 1,643,071.20


Polls


$ 7,500.00


Personal Property


337,977.60


Real Estate


1,297,593.60


Total Taxes Levied on Polls and Property $ 1,643,071.20


Water Liens added to Taxes ..... .... .


$ 4,691.42


TAX RATE 1962 - $96.00


MOTOR VEHICLE AND TRAILER EXCISE


Total Valuation


$ 3,163,865.00


Amount of Warrants to Collector $ 202,418.97


TAX RATE 1962 - $66.00


72


BUILDING INSPECTOR William B. Bullen


Building Inspector's Report for Year 1962:


Estimated Valuation


New Dwellings


123


$1,460,500.00


Residential Additions & Alterations .. 172


191,874.00


New Commercial


9


108,242.00


Commerial Additions & Alterations


24


122,770.00


Renewal Permits


2


60,000.00


Gravel Permits


7


Loam Removal


1


Demolition of Buildings


19


Move Buildings


3


Total


360


$1,943,386.00


Minus 2 Renewal Permits


60,000.00


Total Taxable Property


$1,883,386.00


New Junior High School


1,250,000.00


New Highway & Tree Dept. Garage ..


70,000.00


Total Non Taxable Property


$1,320,000.00


Total All Construction


$3,203,386.00


Building Permits issued


360


Building Inspections made


811


Properties posted dangerous


40


Permit Fees paid to Town Treasurer


$ 2,588.00


Stop Work Orders posted for


various reasons


22


The following is a comparison chart for the years 1960, 1961 and 1962.


1960


1961 83


1962 123


New dwellings


63


Total all construction ...


$2,364,722.00


$1,531,371.00


$3,203,386.00


Total taxable property ..


$1,051,585.00


$1,459,371.00


$1,883,386.00


Total number of Permits


(all types)


253


291


360


Permit fees paid to


Town Treasurer $ 1,608.00 $ 2,008.50 $ 2,588.00


73


FIRE DEPARTMENT William A. Chandler, Chief


Schools, Rest Homes, Nursing Homes


52


Gasoline


4


Oil Permits


32


L.P. Gas


10


This year we completed connecting all the public schools to the fire alarm system. A survey was conducted of the Fire Depart- ment by the New England Fire Insurance Rating Bureau, and due to improvements made in the fire service a reduction in fire insur- ance rates has resulted.


Jan.


Feb.


Mar.


April


May


June


July


Aug.


Sept.


Oct.


Nov.


Dec.


Total


Building


3| 4| 4|


6| 1 | 0| 0| 3| 0| 2|


31 31


Pump


0|


1 | 1 |


4


1


0 |


0 |


0| 0|


0|


1 |


0


8


Brush


1 |


1 |21


87


34


14 |


26


20


13|


14


6


6


243


Chimney


0| 0|0|


1 |


0


0 |


0 |


0


0|


0


1


2 |


4


Auto


2 | 0 | 2 |


6


6


3


3


4


2


5


1


3 |


37


False


1|1 |2


6


4


0


1


7


4 |


4


3


1


34


Resus- citator


2 7 2


9


4


5


4


0


5


8


5


4


55


Electrical


0 | 2 | 4| 2


12


2


2 |


1 | 3


2 |


3


5


38


Accident


1|


1 | 0|


3


1


1


1 | 1 |


3


2


1


1


16


Oil


Burners


3


3 3


3


3


0


0 1 1


3 |1


6


27


Out of Town


1 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 0


9


All


Others


6


4| 3


5


5


7


2


6


3


2


3


9


55


TOTAL


20


24 43 44 87


133 220


76 296


33 329


40 369


41 410


38 448


42 490


27 517


40| 557


557


5 |


74


BOARD OF HEALTH


In compliance with Section 7, of Article II, of the Town By- laws, the Board submits its report.


For specific details on expenditures and in compliance with Section 13, of Article II of the Bylaws, reference is made to the Auditor's report.


At the request of the Board of Selectmen to have more details in the report, the Board would first like to review its functions. The responsibility of the Board of Health flows from the General Laws, the Town Bylaws, and the vote of the Town. These respon- sibilities are many and varied. The most important are as follows:


Care and prevention of contagious diseases.


Care and prevention of infectious diseases.


Care and follow-up of premature children.


Approval of slaughter houses and inspection of cattle, hogs, and sheep slaughtered.


Inspection of animals.


Dog disposal.


Supervision of transportation of garbage.


Supervision of the garbage and rubbish program.


Approval of dumps.


Mosquito control.


Operation of clinics.


Statistical reporting to the Department of Public Health.


Plumbing inspection.


Sanitary inspection.


Dental clinics.


Jurisdiction over nuisances injurious to the public health. Regulation of water supply.


Fitness of buildings for human habitation.


Eviction from unfit dwellings.


Regulation of noisome trades which are dangerous to the public health.


The Board of Health is aware of the number of complaints that have been received due to unsanitary conditions in the town. The Sanitary Inspector has been instructed to investigate these complaints to see that the situations are corrected whenever possible. It should be brought to the attention of the residents that this inspector is on a part-time basis - pay $12.00 per week - and, if all complaints have not been satisfactorily resolved, it is not indifference on the part of the Board, but rather due to a limitation of the inspector's time.


The statutes pertaining to premature children and to infectious


75


and contagious diseases have not changed, with the exception of the care of tuberculosis cases. These cases are now a responsibility of the State rather than of the County. This reorganization was authorized by the General Courts by Chapter 608 of the Acts of 1961, effective January 1, 1963. Under the new setup, the local Board of Health will be responsible for the payment of one-half the average daily cost for hospitalization for individuals residing in the Town who are admitted to a sanitorium. It is estimated that the rate for 1963 will be $20.50 per day, at a cost to the place of residence of $10.25 per day. Under the County system, the charge was $1.75 per day and, in addition to this charge, the Town was assessed a pro-rated cost of the yearly deficit for the operation of the hospitals. In 1962, the assessment on the Assessor's cherry sheet was $11, 235.78. It would appear as if this assessment would be drastically reduced for the year 1963, if not completely elimi- nated. A further change by this law requires the Town to be responsible for all residents entering such a hospital;where in the past the Town was responsible only for cases settled in the Town. To determine whether or not this will be financially advantageous to the Town is impossible at this time. This can only be done after the first one or two years of operation under the new setup.


In regards to dumps, the Board is willing, at any time, to meet with interested people to discuss problems that arise on dumping. If a better solution or plan can be brought out from these discus- sions that would be more beneficial to the Town, the Board will cooperate in the execution of these plans with whatever means they have available to them.


During the year 1962, the Board of Health conducted the following clinics under the supervision of Dr. Jose Ruisanchez, M.D., and Helen Kelley, R.N .:


Salk Polio Clinics: April 11, May 9, October 17 - 702 immunizations.


Diptheria, Pertussis & Tetanus Clinics: March 28, April 25, May 23 - 33 immunizations.


Smallpox Vaccination Clinic: April 18 - 110 innocluations.


Sabin Oral Polio Clinics, Type I - May 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19 -6,291 immunizations.


Sabin Oral Polio Clinics, Type III: June 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 - 6,132 immunizations.


Total immunizations for 1962 were 13,566.


At St. William's School, activities included Massachusetts vision and audio testing, retesting and follow-up, physical exami- nations, and dental clinic.


76


The Board wishes to commend the School Department, especi- ally the Superintendent and the school nurses, for their excellent cooperation during the oral polio clinics in May and June. With this cooperation, the Board was able to furnish protection to 6,200 pre-school and school children. Without this cooperation it would have been impossible to complete the clinics prior to the dangerous summer months.


The Slaughtering Inspector inspected and supervised the slaughtering of 845 cows, 146 calves, 668 hogs, 53 sheep, and 7 goats. There were 4 cows and 7 calves condemned.


There were 40 contagious diseases reported to the Board. In- formation contained was forwarded to the State Department of Public Health.


There were 153 dog bites investigated, 1 squirrel bite investi- gated, and 1 monkey bite investigated; 1 barn inspected, and 3 piggeries inspected, by the Animal Inspector.


Mr. John F. McCormack, Sr., Plumbing Inspecter, submitted the following report:


Plumbing Permits - 120; Sewage Permits - 151; Fees for Plumbing Permits - $923.00; Fees for Sewage Permits - $151.00;


Plumbing Inspections and Complaints - 360 hours; Sewage Inspections and Complaints - 680 hours; Office - 312 hours; On phone at home for information, complaints, and appointments for plumbing and sewage - 360 hours.


Mileage; Plumbing 1200 miles; Sewage 1800 miles.


Mr. Robert Rimbach, Sanitarian, submitted the following report on milk and food inspection: Monthly inspections were made of food handling establishments and bacterial swabs were taken bi-monthly of eating and drinking utensils at those establishments serving food and drink. The reports indicate that much progress has been made during the past by the proprietors to raise the standards of their establishments. Equipment that did not conform to the regulations has been replaced in many instances and sanita- tion control has greatly improved. Those establishments that still remain below standards are making progress to rectify conditions noted on reports. Milk and cream samples were again taken at random from delivery trucks and stores, and examined for butter- fat, coliform, total solids, bacteria count, and phosphatase. Samples of pre-cooked frozen foods were taken and examined for standard plate count, coliform, and coagulase positive staphylococci. Water samples were taken from various locations used for swimming on the Shawsheen River and examined for conformance of standards.


Mrs. Shirley Recks submitted the following report on the


77


dental clinics: The dental health educational program did not get under way until after the March Town Meeting. Mrs. Shirley Recks, assisted by Mrs. Mildred Gourley, started at the Heathbrook, Shawsheen, and North Street Schools in the first grades. From April 4, 1962, to June 11th; and September 17th, through December 21st, 1962, 2,434 children were examined in all, along with tooth- brushing instruction, and reports sent home to parents. This in- cludes 318 children who were examined during pre-school registra- tion in May. 815 children had their teeth cleaned. $813.00 was collected in fees from this service. All children in the first grade who had their teeth cleaned received free toothbrushes, which were donated by their respective P.T.A. or P.T.O. It is hoped that in the near future children from all of the elementary grades may benefit from this program. This will not be possible until it is placed on a full time basis.


SCHOOL


EXAMINED


CLEANED


PAID


Grade 1


North


187


79


79


Shawsheen


131


47


47


Heathbrook


177


86


84


Grades 3-6


North


131


80


80


Shawsheen


494


230


230


Heathbrook


107


43


43


Foster


294


163


163


Grades 1-4


St. Williams ......


144


87


87


Grades 2


EXAMINED ONLY


North


171


Shawsheen


143


Heathbrook


137


TOTAL


2116


815


813


PRE-SCHOOL REGISTRATION


Talked with parents


May 8-Shawsheen School


EXAMINED 104 children


May 9-North Street School


EXAMINED 108 children


May 10- Heathbrook School


EXAMINED 106 children


Total 318


78


BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS


Report for 1962


Number of Services Installed during the year 1962 115


House Service Pipe Installed 8,036 feet


2" Pipe Installed 610 feet


6" Pipe Installed


7,093 feet


6" Pipe Relocated 80 feet


6" Pipe Replaced and Relocated 2,934 feet


8" Pipe Installed 1,901 feet


8" Pipe Replaced and Relocated 109 feet


12" Pipe Installed 2,300 feet


Number of Hydrants Installed 10


Total Gallons Pumped during the year 1962 429,126,450


Total Number of Water Customers at the end of 1962 3463


Number of New Takers during the year 1962 115


BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS


John J. Cooney, Chairman


ROAD COMMISSIONERS


George R. Gray, Chairman


General Highway


The following streets were put into shape, some were graveled, and all received two coats of oil: Cross Street


Woodland Drive


Pinewold Street


Erlin Terrace


Brookfield Road


Lincoln Road


Kingfisher Road


A Section of Birch Street


A Section of Mystic Avenue


A Section of Wolcott Street


8865 gallons of oil were used.


Drainage was installed on Nelson Avenue, Marie Street, Chester Circle, Miles Road and Rhoda Street.


79


Chapter 81


Under Chapter 81 the following Streets were resurfaced, oiled and sanded:


Bailey Road Ballard Stret


Brown Street


Whittemore Street Pine Street Pringle Street


State Street Patten Road


The following Streets received an armor coat of oil and pea stone: A Section of Chandler and A Section of Trull Road.


Hood Road and North Street received a mix-in-place treatment.


900 Tons of Bituminous Concrete were used in patching and maintaining all accepted Streets.


30984 gallons of oil were used.


717 tons of Pea Stone were used.


Chapter 90 Maintenance


Under Chapter 90 Maintenance East Street, Woburn Street, Billerica Road received a Stone Seal Treatment. A section of Shawsheen Street was given a mix-in-place surface.


12,263 gallons of oil and 584 tons of stone were used.


Chapter 90 Construction


A Section of Shawsheen Street was rebuilt, drainage installed, graveled etc. from Patroit Road to within 100 feet of Heath Brook School. This section was completed and surfaced with Bituminous Concrete.


2,844 gallons of oil were used and 1160.65 tons of Bituminous Concrete.


Work has already started on drainage of last secetion.


Special Account Edith Drive Drain


Drainage was installed for a distance of approximately 1000 feet from Edith Drive to Shawsheen River, work being done by Highway Department Personnel.


Special Account Shawsheen Street Sidewalk


This sidewalk from end of Patten Road to Sullivan Parkway was completed. This work was let out to contract but was super- vised by Highway Department.


80


INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION John J. Nolan, Chairman


This Commission looks back on the previous year with a sense of satisfaction and accomplishment.


The Liquid Carbonics Division of General Dynamics Corp. held its official dedication ceremony on July 24, 1962 at which time representatives of this Town and many officials from large industries, as well as from Governor Volpe's office, were in attendance.


On July 25, 1962 the Parkway Refinishing Company, Inc. dedicated their new plant on East Street.


The Lowell Gas Company Booster Plant in West Tewksbury went into operation during the past year.


A very modern and attractive Gasoline and Service Station was added at our Tewksbury Shopping Center.


F. I. Carter & Sons, Inc. have recently added a retail shop opposite their present greenhouses on Main Street.


Thor Aluminum Products Company, Inc. and the North American Distributing Company moved into their new locations on Main Street during the past year.




Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.