USA > Ohio > Clark County > The history of Clark County, Ohio, containing a history of the county; its cities, towns, etc.; general and local statistics; portraits of early settlers and prominent men, V. 1 > Part 44
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45 | Part 46 | Part 47 | Part 48 | Part 49 | Part 50 | Part 51 | Part 52 | Part 53 | Part 54 | Part 55 | Part 56 | Part 57 | Part 58 | Part 59 | Part 60 | Part 61
My votes for Presidents have been as follows: 1824, Adams; 182S, Clay: 1832, Clay; 1836, Harrison; 1840, Harrison; 1844, Clay; 1848, Taylor; 1852, Scott; 1856, Fremont; 1860, Lincoln; 1864, Lincoln; 1868, Grant; 1872, Grant; 1876, Hayes; and in 1880 I hope to vote for Garfield, which will make me sixteen Presidential votes. Respectfully,
THEOPHILUS MCKINNON. London, Ohio.
It had been arranged to suspend exercises at the stand at this point until after dinner, but, having made so good a start, and the assemblage remaining intact and manifesting much interest, the order was gone through with to the end, omitting the musical interludes. Mr. Thomas F. MeGrew, of Mad River National Bank, this city, the historian of the day, upon being introduced by the . Chairman, read the following admirable and accurate paper, which is entitled to careful perusal and preservation. It received the undivided attention of the audience:
MR. PRESIDENT, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN: On the 14th day of June. 1880, an illustrated article was published in the Springfield Republic, entitled: "The "Siege of the Old Indian Town of Piqua. in the month of August, A. D. 1780." Shortly after the publication of said article, the Soldiers' Memorial Association made arrangements for the celebration of the 100th anniversary of that military
Respectfully J.S. Browell
SPRINGFIELD
385
11.
T. J. KIRKPATRICK SPRINGFIELD
386
-
387
HISTORY OF CLARK COUNTY.
event, on the site of the old Indian town. It is for that purpose that we have' met here to-day. It was supposed that this celebration would serve another important purpose: that the investigations which would be made, would deter- mine all disputed points, as to the exact location of the forces engaged in the battle, the site and form of the stockade fort, the old Indian road from Old Chillicothe to Piqua, and the burial-place of the soldiers killed in the fight. The information thus collected, when carefully compiled, would form an inter- esting chapter in the history of the settlement of Ohio. In reference to this event, we have not the usual record authority to aid our investigations. I wrote to the War Department for copies of papers on file that might in any manner be connected with the siege, and received the following letter from the Hou. Alex Ramsey, Secretary of War:
"SIR: Replying to your letter of the 5th inst., expressing a desire to pro- cure, if on file, a copy of a report by Gen. George R. Clark of his capture of the old Indian town of Piqua, August 8, 1780, I beg to inform you that the Adjutant General reports that the desired report is not on file, and that the records of his office do not cover so early a date as the one named."
An official report of this battle may be found in Virginia, but investigation there could not be made in time for this celebration. I hope the subject will be pursued until an official report has been found, or the fact ascertained that none was ever made. The materials furnished here to-day affecting the Shaw- nee tribe of Indians, the local history of the construction of the town of old Piqua, the early settlers of Clark County and the town of Boston, are as fol- lows:
1. An accurate and exhaustive history of the Shawnee tribe of Indians, by C. C. Royce, of the Smithsonian Institution, Washington City.
2. A letter from Hon. C. W. Butterfield, on the same subject, with some personal incidents in the life of Simon Girty.
3. Aletter from William Patrick upon the pioneer settlers of Clark County and the city of Springfield.
4. A letter from Dr. John Ludlow on the town of Boston, which has disap- peared, not one house being left.
5. A letter from Dr. John J. Musson, in reference te Cata-he-cas-sa, or Black Hoof. In this intersecting letter, he states that Black Hoof was the "confidential friend of the great Tecumseh, and, at the instance of the latter, at. tempted to unite the several Indian tribes into a general confederacy, so as the more effectually to resist the constantly increasing encroachments of the whites." On this point in the history of these two Indians, I most respectfully suggest that Benjamin Drake, who had gone over the whole subject in his "Life of Tecumseh," says that " when'Tecumseh and the Prophet embarked in their scheme for the recovery of the lands as far south as the Ohio River, it became their interest as well as policy to enlist Black Hoof in the enterprise, and every effort which the genius of one and the cunning of the other could devise was brought to bear upon him. But Black Hoof continued faithful to the treaty which he had signed at Greenville in 1795, and by prudence and influence kept the greater part of his tribe from joining the standard of Tecumseh or en- gaging on the side of the British in the late war with England.
6. A letter from Isaac Smucker, of Newark. Ohio.
7. A letter from Theophilus MeKinnon. of London.
These historical papers will be published and made part of the proceedings of the day's celebration. The parties brought together in the battle fought over this field one hundred years ago represented four forces in human affairs, of great and far-reaching consequences. Gen. George R. Clark represented the white race. He had been educated according to the highest standard of colo-
388
HISTORY OF CLARK COUNTY.
nial times, and was a military officer of considerable experience in war, and of great reputation as an Indian fighter. His army was composed of a class of men who have all passed away, called "backwoodsmen." We all remember their bravery, qualities of great personal endurance and high patriotism. The Shawuees represented one of the most warlike tribes that have been found on the continent, under command of Indians of the highest type, of large experi- ence and undoubted courage. The Mingo Indians were commanded by Simon Girty, one of the most degraded specimens of the white race; but, combining the training he had received in the settlement with Indian cruelty and treach- ery, made him a formidable opponent. The result of the fight determined the superiority of the whites, who realized the encouraging influences of the vic- tory, and the Indians became satisfied that separate and independent tribes could not stand up against the advancing settlements, and Clark's victory dem- onstrated that two tribes combined-the Shawnees and Mingoes-could not do so; and the determination of this point, in my judgment, makes Clark's battle the decisive one of our Indian wars. St. Clair's defeat was the result of negli- gence, and the victory at " the battle of the Fallen Timbers" was obtained by the great care bostowed by the Government on the material prepared for that campaign; but the victory of Gen. Clark over the Shawnees at this place was an inspiration-quick, complete and decisive. From this time forward, the Indians sought for a confederation and foreign aid. The desire of confedera- tion was at no time, and with no chief, an inspiration, but a conviction of weak- ness most emphatically declared by Clark's victory.
Gen. Jackson, in his message of December 7, 1830, says:
"Humanity has often wept over the fate of the aborigines of this country, and philanthropy has been long busily employed in devising means to avert it. But its progress has never for a moinent been arrested; and one by one have many powerful tribes disappeared from the earth."
Such has been the fate of the Shawnees, who once occupied this valley. When first known to the whites, they were a numerous and warlike people of Georgia and South Carolina. (Mr. Royce's letter,# read here to day, traces them to a higher antiquity.) They abandoned or were driven from that locality, and located in Pennsylvania and took part in the tragic scenes of the Wyoming Valley. They fought on Braddock's field, at Point Fleasant, and along the whole line of the Western frontier, and lastly, we find them on the Wabash at Tippecanoe. Their traditions, if carefully preserved, would have embraced a hundred battle-fields in as many separate districts, which now embrace eight or nine sovereign States, with a population of from eight to ten millions of people. From this place where we are now assembled, one hundred years ago they were driven by Gen. George Rogers Clark. The manner or plan of the battle I do not propose to explain, for it will be demonstrated to you by what is called a sham battle; but I will trace the life, character and influence of one of their most distinguished chiefs, because of the power he exerted to prevent the settle- ment of the State of Ohio, and of course the county of Clark.
The celebrated Tecumseh was born in Old Piqua in 1768, and was twelve years old when Gen. Clark captured the town, and as a boy, must have wit- nessed the battle and defeat of his countrymen. It could not fail to have influ- enced his after life. Perhaps the event decided his whole career. Let that be as it may, I wish to speak of him as I understand his history. His life becomes quite interesting to us because of the fact that he was born within the limits of Clark County: but the whole life of Tecumseh cannot be perfectly compre- hended until one has studied the life of his brother, the Indian Prophet, Law- le-wa-se-kaw. I cannot trace the history of both the brothers, for want of
* This letter is printed with the article entitled " Indian Occupancy."
-
389
HISTORY OF CLARK COUNTY.
time, and will only refer to the most distinguished one of the two, unconnected and apart from the traditions of his tribe, and the magic practiced by the Prophet.
I will limit myself to four points in his history, and their treatment by me will in no sense be the popular view of the subject. And first, his bravery; second, treacherous disposition; third, misapprehension of the legitimate rights of his tribe, in relation to other tribes and the Government of the United States; fourth, the failure of his contemplated union, or confederation of the Indian tribes, even as an ally of the British Goverment, and himself fighting as a Brigadier General in its army. It has been said, by a distinguished gentleman from Ohio, that Tecumseh was the "Napoleon of the West." It will not be regarded as out of the record for me to say. in this connection, that I do not concur in the justice of this title.
The same writer continues to say:
"So far as that title was deserved by splendid genins, unwavering conr- age, untiring perseverance, boldness of conception and promptness of execution, it was fairly bestowed on this savage."
It is in such extravagant language as that just quoted that writers love to indulge in when they refer to the Indian chief. I think that he was no bet- ter than his vagabond brother, the Prophet.
To read the life of Tecumseh as written by some of his admirers, and to accept their estimate of his character, is calculated to make one regret the fall of a chief who. they hold, contemplated the union of his race, and to believe that he was justly and rightfully entitled, in his lifetime, to have checked the advance of civilization, and to hold the vast West an unbroken empire of the confederate Indian tribes. In these views I do not concur. I regard him as having been but a little in advance of his race. He was only a cunning savage -nothing more than that. James, a British historian, in his account of the battle of the Thames, describes him as follows:
"A Shawnee, five feet ten inches high, and with more that the usual stout- ness. He possessed all the agility and perseverance of the Indian character. His carriage was dignified; his eye penetrating; his countenance, even in death, betrayed indications of a lofty spirit. rather of the sterner cast." This writer was describing an officer of the English army. His national pride would incline him to a favorable estimate of an Indian chief who served in the English army, and in that light we must regard his portraiture of Tecniuseh. I have met and conversed with an early settler in Clark County who remem- bered his personal appearance, and described him as nothing above that of an ordinary Indian.
As an illustration of his morals and honor, in his early life, I give the foi- lowing incident: It was communicated to me by a friend, who obtained the same information from an early settler in Clark County, that Tecumseh traded with a white man a much-worn saddle for one that appeared better. The white man repaired the saddle which he obtained in the trade, and, by the use of his own skill and materials, made it look the better one of the two. When Tecumseh next met this white man with the repaired saddle, he treacherously claimed it as his own. The white man invited him to settle the right of ownership by a fwr-oual conflict, which the Indian very cowardiy declined. The want of honor in a savage might be excused, but the want of courage would be condemned by the whole of his race. The truth of his personal timidity is easily believed. when all his biographers adunit, on the authority of some Indian chiefs, that in his first battle, fought hear the present site of Dayton. he became frightened and float from the field. This last-stated fact was told by those personally present and acquainted with it, to show a want of courage in Tecumseh. This personal
390
HISTORY OF CLARK COUNTY.
trait in his character ,has been part of the history of several great men, who in after life became brave, but. as it is the grandest virtue in a savage to be brave, I reproduce the circumstance as an answer to those who desire to celebrate Tecumseh as a hero from infancy. The chief indicated great treachery of dis- position by his conduct on several different occasions. A council was held at Springfield, Ohio, in the year A. D. 1807. in a sugar grove situated a little east of the court house as now located. McPherson's command, in compliance with the request of the Commissioners, left their arms a few miles from the place of the conference, but Tecumseh and his party refused to attend without bringing their arms with them. The reason that he desired to be armed in a conference with parties who were not armed can be accounted for upon no other ground than that of contemplated treachery. He had no reason to fear danger from unarmed men, neither did he need arms for the protection of his party at a conference to be held for no purpose but the desirable one of peace. His con- duct was not amiable, but sullen and rude. This treacherous disposition of the savage was confirmed by his conduct at the council of Vincennes, held with Gen. Harrison in the month of August, A. D. 1810. He attended with 400 warriors in full war paint, bringing by their sides tomahawks and war clubs. They reached the town in eighty canoes. The warriors were painted in the most terrific style of savage life. The canoes were examined and found well prepared for war. Forty of his principal warriors attended Tecumseh at the conference, the exact location of which had been selected by himself. Here he acted with great violence, evidently intending mischief to the Governor, who wisely called up his guard in time to prevent a bloody termination of the coun . cil called to secure a continuance of peace. Great care has been bestowed upon this part of his history, with the intention of proving that he did not intend treachery, but this does not seem to be maintainable when we recall the signifi- cant fact of the presence of 400 warriors, armed and in war paint. His conduct here makes the impression on my mind that he intended, if an op- portunity afforded, to murder Gen. Harrison.
Gen. Proctor, of the British army, hoped to reduce Fort Meigs, and, upon doubtful authority, it has been said that he promised to surrender all the pris- oners who had fought at Tippecanoe to the Indians, to be disposed of as they might in council decide. Among these of course would be Gen. Harrison, who was to have been delivered to Tecumseh, and to be disposed of at the pleasure of that chief. Davidson's Historical Narrative asserts: "There is no doubt that when Proctor made arrangements for the attack on Fort Meigs with Tecumseh, the latter insisted and the former agreed (perhaps submitted to what. he could not help) that the white prisoners should be handed over to the Indians."
Drake unwillingly admits that " Tecumseh may possibly have made such an arrangement with Proctor, and announced it to the Indians, for the purpose of exciting them to activity and perseverance in carrying on the siege."
The command of Col. Dudley, after the death of its commander, surren- dered to the British, and. while huddled together in an old garrison, the In- dians commenced to put them to death. Please remember that no white soldier participated in the massacre, which it is claimed that Tecumseh tried to pre- pent, and denounced Gen. Proctor for permitting. The General said: "Your Indians cannot be commanded." In reply to this, it has been reported that Tecumseh said: "Begone! you are unfit to command. Go and put on petti- coats!" It does not seem at all probable that an Indian would address a Brit- ish commander in this style. It is possible, as he could not speak English. that some one has invented this answer for him. There is much testimony to show that Gen. Harrison and all who fought at Tippecanoe were to have been
391
HISTORY OF CLARK COUNTY.
given up to the Indians. I incline to the opinion that Gen. Proctor did not make the offer, but that Tecumseh demanded the prisoners as a reward for mil - itary service, and that if he had obtained the person of Gen. Harrison, he would have burned him at the stake. Tecumseh's own language proves him to have been capable of such conduct. He once declared that he "could not look upon the face of a white man without feeling the flesh crawl upon his bones." When Detroit was captured, on August 16, 1812, Tecumseh com- manded the Indians. After the surrender, Gen. Brock requested him not to allow his Indians to ill-treat prisoners, to which he replied: "No! I despise them too much to mneddle with them."
The saddle trade, flight from the battle-field near Dayton, the council at Springfield and at Vincennes, prove Tecumseh to have been cowardly in the early part of his life, and in the latter part, treacherous. He was a savage -- nothing more. He possessed no qualities of grandness. He believed in the witchcraft of his prophet brother, and was no better than he was -- only braver. His plan for the union and confederation of the Indian tribes was impossible --- a misapprehension of the right. It was in violation of Indian tradition, and of the rules of international law, which all writers regard as conducive to the rights of nations, to common justice, and the happiness of the people whose government adheres to its principles. His union was to be supported upon the new doctrine that "no particular portion of the country belonged to the tribe then within its limits, though in reference to other tribes its title was perfect; that is, possession excluded them forever, but did not confer on the tribe having it the right to sell us (the United States) the soil, for that was the common property of all the tribes who were near enough to occupy or hunt upon it, and it could only be vacated by the consent of all the tribes."
Under this new doctrine, he proposed to hold land which had been ceded to the United States by treaty, and threatened to kill all the chiefs concerned in making the treaty in reference to the lands disposed of. The doctrine was a new departure from the Indian practice from the first discovery of the conti- nent, and, if insisted upon, would involve all the tribes in a war with the United States. He carried with him a red stick, the acceptance of which was regarded as equivalent to joining his party; hence, Indians hostile to the United States were called Red Sticks. He failed to engage any number of the tribes in his plan, all hope of which was defeated by Gen. Harrison at Tippecanoe. The new doctrine did not originate with Tecumseh, but it failed under his leadership; but if his union had succeeded, the settlers in the West would have been murdered, and it- present prosperous condition delayed many years. Gen. Harrison, who was m a position to be well informed, wrote to the Government: "That the com- plaint of injury, with regard to the lands. is a mere pretense suggested to the Prophet by British emissaries and partisans."
Tecumseh fell fighting for the British and against the United States, at the battle of the Thames, in the month of October, A. D. 1813. He is buried not far from the battle-field. His death seems to have been considered of small recount at the time, as Gen. Harrison did not mention it in the report of the but the English bore testimony to his good conduct. Think as we may of this savage, his memory will ever live in the annals of the early settlement of Ohio. Ho lies buried on the banks of the River Thames, rendered ever illus- treams by the bones of an Indian who was born within the present limits of Clark County. Ohio, and who has been pronounced a statesman, warrior and patriot. In reference to the place of his grave, Charles A. Jones, of Cincinnati, Wrote a poem entitled:
"Tecumseh, the last King of the Ohio."
I reproduce the first verse:
392
HISTORY OF CLARK COUNTY.
" Where rolls the dark and turbid Thames, His consecrated wave along, Sleeps one, than whose few are the names More worthy of the Ivre and song; Yet o'er whose spot of lone repose No pilgrim eyes are seen to weep; And no memorial marble throws Its shadow where his ashes sleep."
Since the writing of these verses, a monument has been erected at his grave.
We do not wish to recall the history of the aborigines who occupied this locality, or any other, to extol their supposed greatness, or to lament their dis- appearance, but to compare them with the white race of people who have fol- lowed them, and learn from the past useful lessons for the present, and from the wonderful events and improvements made in the last one hundred years, pre- sent the power, talent, genius and unequaled greatness of the people who occupy this land. In the place of the Indian trail, they have laid down railroads; where stood a wigwam, they have built cities; they have digged down the mountains, bridged rivers, defied deserts-some they have made productive- extorted from the rocks of the land gold, silver, iron, copper and tin. The hunt- ing-grounds of the passed-away race are annually covered with crops of wheat. rye, corn and grass. The site of Old Piqua is about the center of a food-producing district, with a surplus produce great enough to feed the world. It was part of the inevitable that the red man should depart and the white man take his place. No thoughtful person would prefer a country covered with forests and ranged by a few savages, to our extensive State, covered with cities, towns and well- cultivated farms, embellished with all the improvements that art can devise or industry execute, occupied by more than three millions of people, enjoying all the blessings of liberty, civilization and religion.
GEN. W. H. GIBSON.
Gen. W. H. Gibson, Adjutant General of Ohio, addressed the audience substantially as follows:
What means this vast assemblage? Why do men of all classes forsake their employments and gather here on this day? Men from all branches of trade and industry are of one spirit to-day, and are here to commemorate the fact that 100 years ago to-day, this territory, then the resort only of wild Indians and beasts of the forest, was taken possession of by the representatives of the Christian religion, and who were the pioneers of Christian civilization. Under Gen. George Rogers Clark, the hunters of Kentucky met the savages of the Shawnee tribe. I see them now as they advanced upon the foe. Onward dash the brave Kentuckians. The battle rages, and finally victory is plucked from the bosom of apparent defeat. Under the "Stars and Stripes" -- the flag of the free --- the battle was gained over the Indians who represented the flag of Great Britain. This was a battle of the great Revolution. The leader of our forces here was George Rogers Clark, a young man of twenty-six years of age. and he had gained fame already in other fields. On this day, 100 years ago, the hardy, patriotic pioneers rushed on the Indian village and destroyed its cabins, then destroyed the acres of growing corn, and then returned to their homes in Kentucky.
Where are these men to-day? In unserried ranks, they are marching among the armies of heaven. Their bodies sleep in the soil bere, but they are looking down upon us to-day from the battlements above. They look down to-day upon an age of new and advanced ideas and achievements. One hundred years
393
HISTORY OF CLARK COUNTY.
have wrought new and wondrous things. A hundred years ago, Ohio was a wilderness. To-day, it has 3,200,000 people-more than all the country pos. sessed in 1780. To-day, we have in the United States fifty millions of people -wiser and more enterprising and happier than any other fifty millions of peo- ple in the world. To-day, the broad field's and the busy factories of our coun- try send their products across the seas to all portions of the civilized globe. And now may the flag that has floated over America for a hundred years still float as the emblem of the principles of civil and religious freedom! The fact that there are Americans everywhere, in all the lands to-day, and the fact that her products are in every clime, are due to the fact that there were George Rogers Clarks one hundred years ago! To-day, the American pioneers are building their fires in every canon in Colorado, and in California and Oregon, and they are even going beyond the Pacific to China and Japan!
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.