USA > California > Napa County > History of Napa and Lake Counties, California : comprising their geography, geology, topography, climatography, springs and timber, together with a full and particular record of the Mexican Grants, also separate histories of all the townships and biographical sketches > Part 15
USA > California > Lake County > History of Napa and Lake Counties, California : comprising their geography, geology, topography, climatography, springs and timber, together with a full and particular record of the Mexican Grants, also separate histories of all the townships and biographical sketches > Part 15
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45 | Part 46 | Part 47 | Part 48 | Part 49 | Part 50 | Part 51 | Part 52 | Part 53 | Part 54 | Part 55 | Part 56 | Part 57 | Part 58 | Part 59 | Part 60 | Part 61 | Part 62 | Part 63 | Part 64 | Part 65 | Part 66 | Part 67 | Part 68 | Part 69 | Part 70 | Part 71 | Part 72 | Part 73 | Part 74 | Part 75 | Part 76 | Part 77 | Part 78 | Part 79 | Part 80 | Part 81 | Part 82 | Part 83 | Part 84 | Part 85 | Part 86 | Part 87 | Part 88 | Part 89 | Part 90 | Part 91 | Part 92 | Part 93 | Part 94 | Part 95 | Part 96 | Part 97 | Part 98
The result of the election was: Peter H. Burnett, Governor ; John Mc- Dougal, Lieutenant-Governor ; and Edward Gilbert and George W. Wright sent to Congress. The District of Sonoma polled at this election but five hundred and fifty-two votes, four hundred and twenty-four of which were for Burnett. Of the representatives sent from Sonoma, General Vallejo went to the Senate, and J. S. Bradford and J. E. Brackett to the Assembly. Some difficulty would appear to have risen at this election, for Mr. R. A. Thompson says: "General Vallejo's seat was first given to James Spect, but on the twenty-second of December, the committee reported that the official return from Larkin's Ranch gave Spect but two votes instead of twenty-eight, a total of but one hundred and eighty-one votes against Gen-
126
History of Napa and Lake Counties-NAPA.
eral Vallejo's one hundred and ninety-nine." Mr. Spect then gave up his seat to General Vallejo.
We now produce the following interesting account of some of those who formed the first California Legislature, not because it bears specially on our subject, but as a matter of curiosity, interest and reference :
The following is from the Colusa Sun of April 26th :
Hon. John S. Bradford, of Springfield, Illinois, who was a member of the first California Legislature, procured from some of his colleagues a short biographical sketch. Thinking it might be a matter of interest to the people of California at the present time, he sends it to us. We have the original document, with the sketches in the handwriting of each inember. Most of these gentlemen have figured conspicuously in the history of the State since, but we believe there are but few now living. Three of the sketches-José M. Covarrubias, M. G. Vallejo and Pablo de la Guerra-are written in Spanish, but we have had them translated.
SENATORS.
David F. Douglass-Born in Sumner County, Tennessee, the 8th of January, 1821. Went to Arkansas with Fulton in 1836. On the 17th of March, 1839, had a fight with Dr. Wm. Howell, in which H. was killed; imprisoned fourteen months ; returned home in 1842; immigrated to Mis- sissippi ; engaged in the Choctaw speculation; moved with the Choctaws west as a clerk ; left there for Texas in the winter of 1845-6. War broke out; joined Hay's regiment; from Mexico immigrated to California, and arrived here as a wagoner in December, 1848.
M. G. Vallejo-Born in Monterey, Upper California, July 7, 1807. On the 1st of January, 1825, he commenced his military career in the capacity of cadet. He served successively in the capacity of Lieutenant, Captain of cavalry, Lieutenant-Colonel, and General Commandant of Upper California. In 1835 he went to Sonoma County and founded the town of Sonoma, giving land for the same. He was a member of the Convention in 1849 and Senator in 1850.
Elcan Heydenfeldt-Born in Charleston, South Carolina, September 15, 1821 ; immigrated to Alabama in 1841; from thence to Louisiana in 1844 ; to California in 1849. Lawyer by profession.
Pablo de la Guerra-Born in Santa Barbara, Upper California, Novem- ber 29, 1819. At the age of nineteen he entered the public service. He was appointed Administrator-General "de la rentas," which position he held when California was taken by the American forces. From that time he lived a private life until he was named a member of the Convention which framed the Constitution of the State. Represents the district of Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo in the Senate.
John Lewellung 7
127
Political History of Napa County.
S. E. Woodworth-Born in the city of New York November 15, 1815. Commenced career as a sailor A. D. 1832. Sailed from New York March 9, 1834. Entered the navy of the United States June 14, 1838. Immigrated to California, via Rocky Mountains and Oregon, April 1, 1846. Resignation accepted by Navy Department October 29, 1849. Elected to represent the district of Monterey in the first Senate of the first Legislature of California for the term of two years.
Thos. L. Vermeule-Born in New Jersey on the 11th of June, 1814. Immigrated to California November 12, 1846. Did represent San Joaquin district in the Senate. Resigned.
W. D. Fair-Senator from the San Joaquin district, California. Native of Virginia. Immigrated to California from Mississippi in February, 1849, as " President of the Mississippi Rangers." Settled in Stockton, San Joaquin district, as an attorney-at-law.
Elisha O. Crosby-Senator from Sacramento District. Native of New York State. Immigrated from New York December 25, 1848. Aged thirty- four.
D. C. Broderick-Senator from San Francisco. Born in Washington, City, D. C., February 4, 1818. Immigrated from Washington to New York City March, 1824. Left New York for California April 17, 1849.
E. Kirby Chamberlin, M. D .- President pro tem. of the Senate, from the district of San Diego. Born in Litchfield County, Connecticut, April 24, 1805. Immigrated from Connecticut to Onondago County, New York, in 1815 ; thence to Beaver, Pennsylvania, in 1829; thence to Cincinnati, Ohio, in 1842 ; served as surgeon in the United States army during the war with Mexico; appointed surgeon to the Boundary Line Commission February 10, 1840 ; embarked from Cincinnati, Ohio, February 15; arrived in San Diego June 1, 1849, and in San José December 12, 1849.
J. Bidwell-Born in Chautauqua County, New York, 5th of August, 1819. Immigrated to Pennsylvania ; thence to Ohio; thence to Missouri ; thence in 1841 to California. Term in Senate one year.
H. C. Robinson, Senator from Sacramento; elected November 15, 1849. Born in the State of Connecticut. Immigrated at an early age to Louisiana. Educated as a lawyer, but engaged in commercial pursuits. Arrived at San Francisco February, 1849, per steamer "California," the first that ever entered said port.
Benjamin S. Lippincott, Senator from San Joaquin-Born in New York. Immigrated February, 1846, from New Jersey. By pursuit a merchant. Elected for two years.
ASSEMBLYMEN.
Elam Brown-Born in the State of New York in 1797. Immigrated from Massachusetts in 1805 ; to Illinois in 1818 ; to Missouri 1837, and from Platte County, in Missouri, 1846, to California.
128
History of Napa and Lake Counties-NAPA.
J. S. K. Ogier-Born in Charleston, South Carolina. Immigrated to New Orleans, 1845, and from there to California December 18, 1848.
E. B. Bateman, M. D .- Immigrated from Missouri April, 1847. Resi- dence, Stockton, Alta California.
Edmund Randolph-Born in Richmond, Virginia. Immigrated to New Orleans, 1843 ; thence to California, 1849. Residence, San Francisco.
E. P. Baldwin-Born in Alabama. Immigrated from thence in January, 1849. Arrived in California May 1, 1850. Represents San Joaquin district. Resides in Sonora, Tuolumne County.
A. P. Crittenden-Born in Lexington, Kentucky. Educated in Ohio, Alabama, New York and Pennsylvania. Settled in Texas in 1839. Came to California in 1849. Represents the County of Los Angeles.
Alfred Wheeler-Born in the City of New York the 30th day of April, 1820. Resided in New York City until the 21st of May, 1849, when he left for California. Citizen and resident of San Francisco, which district he represents.
James A. Gray, Philadelphia-Monterey, California. Immigrated in 1846, in the first New York Regiment of Volunteers.
Joseph Aram-Native of State of New York. Immigrated to California 1846. Present residence, San José, Santa Clara County.
Joseph C. Morehead-Born in Kentucky. Immigrated to California in 1846. Resides at present in the county of Calaveras, San Joaquin district.
Benjamin Cory, M. D .- Born November 12, 1822. Immigrated to the Golden State in 1847. Residence in the valley of San José.
Thomas J. Henley-Born in Indiana. Family now resides in Charles- town, in that State. Immigrated to California in 1849, through the South Pass. Residence at Sacramento.
José M. Covarrubias-Native of France. Came to California in 1834. Residence in Santa Barbara, and representative for that district.
Elisha W. Mckinstry-Born in Detroit, Michigan. Immigrated to Cali- fornia in March, 1849. Residence in Sacramento district, city of Sutter.
George B. Tingley-Born August 15, 1815, Clermont County, Ohio. Immigrated to Rushville, Indiana, November 4, 1834. Started to California April 4, 1849. Reached there October 16th. Was elected to the Assembly November 13th, from Sacramento district, and is now in Pueblo de San José.
Mr. Bradford himself represents our (Sonoma) district in the Assembly.
On Saturday, December 15, 1849, the first State Legislature met at San José, E. Kirby Chamberlin being elected President pro tem. of the Senate, and Thomas J. White, Speaker of the Assembly.
In the year 1850, Senator M. G. Vallejo became convinced that the capital of California should be established at a place which he desired to
129
Political History of Napa County.
name Eureka, but which his colleagues, out of compliment to himself, sug- gested should be named Vallejo. To this end the General addressed a memorial to the Senate, dated April 3, 1850, wherein he graphically pointed out the advantages possessed by the proposed site over other places which claimed the honor. In this remarkable document, remarkable alike for its generosity of purpose as for its marvellous foresight, he proposed to grant twenty acres to the State, free of cost, for a State Capitol and grounds, and one hundred and thirty-six acres more for other State buildings, to be apportioned in the following manner : Ten acres for the Governer's house and grounds ; five acres for the offices of Treasurer, Comptroller, Secretary of State, Surveyor-General, and Attorney-General, should the Commissioners determine that their offices should not be in the capitol building ; one acre to State Library and Translator's office, should it be determined to separate them from the State-house building; twenty acres for an Orphan Asylum ; ten acres for a Male Charity Hospital; ten acres for a Female Charity Hospital ; four acres for an Asylum for the Blind; four acres for a Deaf and Dumb Asylum; twenty acres for a Lunatic Asylum; eight acres for four Common Schools; twenty acres for a State University ; four acres for a State Botanical Garden ; and twenty acres for a State Penitentiary.
But with a munificence casting this already long list of grants into the shade, he further proposed to donate and pay over to the State, within two years after the acceptance of these propositions, the gigantic sum of $370,000, to be apportioned in the following manner: For the building of a State Capitol, $125,000; for furnishing the same, $10,000; for building of the Governor's house, $10,000 ; for furnishing the same, $5000 ; for the building of State Library and Translator's office, $5000; for a State Library, $5000; for the building of the offices of the Secretary of State, Comptroller, Attorney-General, Surveyor-General and Treasurer, should the Commis- sioners deem it proper to separate them from the State House, $20,000 ; for the building of an Orphan Asylum, $20,000; for the building of a Female Charity Hospital, $20,000; for the building of a Male Charity Hospital, $20,000; for the building of an Asylum for the Blind, $20,000; for the building of a Deaf and Dumb Asylum, $20,000 ; for the building of a State University, $20,000; for University Library, $5000 ; for scientific apparatus therefor, $5000; for chemical laboratory therefor, $3000; for a mineral cabinet therefor, $3000; for the building of four common school edifices, $10,000; for purchasing books for same, $1000; for the building of a Lunatic Asylum, $20,000; for a State Penitentiary, $20,000; for a State botanical collection, $3000.
In his memorial, the General states with much lucidity his reasons for claiming the proud position for the place suggested as the proper site for
9
130
History of Napa and Lake Counties-NAPA.
the State Capital. Mark the singleness of purpose with which he bases these claims :-
" Your memoralist, with this simple proposition (namely, that in the event of the Government declining to accept his terms it should be put to the popular vote at the general election held in November of that year- 1850), might stop here, did he not believe that his duty as a citizen of Cali- fornia required him to say thus much in addition-that he believes the location indicated is the most suitable for a permanent seat of government for the great State of California, for the following reasons : That it is the true center of the State, the true center of commerce, the true center of pop- ulation, and the true center of travel; that, while the Bay of San Francisco is acknowledged to be the first on the earth, in point of extent and naviga- ble capacities, already, throughout the length and breath of the wide world, it is acknowledged to be the very center between Asiatic and European commerce. The largest ship that sails upon the broad sea can, within three hours, anchor at the wharves of the place which your memorialist proposes as your permanent seat of government. From this point, by steam naviga- tion, there is a greater aggregate of mineral wealth within eight hours' steaming, than exists in the Union ; besides, from this point the great north and south rivers-San Joaquin and Sacramento-cut the State longitudi- nally through the center, fringing the immense gold deposits on the one hand and untold mercury and other mineral resources on the other ; from this point steam navigation extends along the Pacific Coast south to San Diego and north to the Oregon line, affording the quickest possible facilities for our sea-coast population to reach the State Capital in the fewest number of hours. This age, as it has been truly remarked, has merged distance into time. In the operations of commerce and the intercourse of mankind, to measure miles by the rod is a piece of vandalism of a by-gone age; and that point which can be approached from all parts of the State in the fewest number of hours, and at the cheapest cost, is the truest center.
The location which your memorialist proposes as the permanent seat of government is certainly that point.
Your memorialist most respectfully submits to your honorable body, whether there is not a ground of even still higher nationality? It is this : that at present, throughout the wide extent of our sister Atlantic States, but one sentiment seems to possess the entire people, and that is, to build in the shortest possible time, a railroad from the Mississippi to the Bay of San Francisco, where its western terminus may meet a three weeks' steamer from China. Indeed, such is the overwhelming sentiment of the American people upon this subject, that there is but little doubt to apprehend its early completion. Shall it be said then, while the world is coveting our possession of what all acknowledge to be the half-way house of the earth's commerce
131
Political History of Napa County.
-the great Bay of San Francisco-that the people of the rich possessions are so unmindful of its value as not to ornament her magnificent shores with a capital worthy of a great State ?"
Upon receipt of General Vallejo's memorial by the Senate, a committee composed of members who possessed a thorough knowledge of the country comprised in the above-quoted document, both geographical and topographi- cal, were directed to report for the information of the President, upon the advantages claimed for the location of the capital at the spot suggested in preference to others. The report in which the following words occur, was presented to the Senate on April 2, 1850 :- " Your committee cannot dwell with too much warmth upon the magnificent propositions contained in the memorial of General Vallejo. They breathe throughout the spirit of an enlarged mind and a sincere public benefactor, for which he deserves the thanks of his countrymen and the admiration of the world. Such a propo- sition looks more like the legacy of a mighty Emperor to his people than the free donation of a private planter to a great State, yet poor in public finance, but soon to be among the first of the earth."
The report which was presented by Senator D. C. Broderick of San Francisco, goes on to point out the necessities which should govern the choice of a site for California's capital, recapitulates the advantages pointed out in the memorial, and finally recommends the acceptance of General Vallejo's offer. This acceptance did not pass the Senate without some opposition and considerable delay ; however, on Tuesday, February 4, 1851, a message was received from Governor Burnett, by his Private Secretary, Mr. Ohr, informing the Senate that he did this day sign an Act originating in the Senate entitled " An Act to provide for the permanent location of the seat of government." In the meantime General Vallejo's bond had been accepted ; his solvency was approved by a committee appointed by the Sen- ate to inquire into that circumstance ; the report of the commissioners sent to mark and lay out the tracts of land proposed to be donated was adopted, and on May 1, 1851, the last session of the Legislature at San José was completed ; but the archives were not moved to the new seat of government at Vallejo then, the want of which was the cause of much dissatisfaction among the members.
The Legislature first sat at Vallejo on January 5, 1852, but there was wanting the attraction of society which would appear to be necessary to the seat of every central government. With these Sacramento abounded, from her proximity to the mines. The Assembly therefore, with a unanimity bordering on the marvelous, passed a bill to remove the session to that city, ball tickets and theater tickets being tendered to the members in reckless profusion. The bill was transferred to the Senate and bitterly fought by the Hons. Paul K. Hubbs and Phil. A. Roach. The removal was rejected by
132
History of Napa and Lake Counties -- NAPA.
one vote. This was on a Saturday, but never was the proverb of we " know not what the morrow may bring forth," more fully brought to bear upon any consideration. Senator Anderson, it is said, passed a sleepless night through the presence of unpleasant insects in his couch ; on the Monday morning he moved a reconsideration of the bill; the alarm was sounded on every hand, and at 2 p. M. on January 12, 1852, the Government and Legis- lature were finding its way to Sacramento by way of the Carquinez Straits. On March 7, 1852, a devastating flood overwhelmed Sacramento, and where they had before feared contamination, they now feared drowning. The Legislature adjourned at Sacramento May 4, 1852, the next session to be held at Vallejo. On January 3, 1853, the peripatetic government met again at Vallejo, whither had been moved in May the archives and State offices. Once more the spirit of jealousy was rampant; Sacramento could not with any grace ask for its removal thither again ; but she, working with Benicia, the capital was once more on wheels and literally carted off to the latter town for the remaining portion of the session, when a bill was passed to fix the capital of the State at Sacramento, and thereafter clinched by large appropriations for building the present magnificent capitol there. The last sitting of the Legislature was held on February 4, 1853, when it was re- solved to meet at Benicia on the 11th of the month, the vote then taken being as follows: Ayes-Messrs. Baird, Denver, Estill, Hager, Hubbs, Hudspeth, Keene, Lind, Lott, Lyons, MeKibben, Roach, Smith, Snyder, Sprague, Wade, Wombough-17. Nays-Crabb, Cofforth, Foster, Gruwell, Ralston, Walkup -- 6.
But to return to our particular subject. During the first session at San José, but little was done beyond dividing the State into counties and organ- izing their governments. At this time Robert Hopkins was elected District Judge and Assemblyman, J. E. Brackett Major-General of the Second Divi- sion of Militia. Mr. Hopkins, who, with the Hon. George Pearce, had been appointed a committee to visit the capital in order to prevent, if possible, the establishment of a boundary line which would include the Sonoma Valley in Napa County, was a resident lawyer of Sonoma. On arrival at San José, the question of appointing a Judge for the Sonoma district was attracting attention, and the only candidate was W. R. Turner, who, though a gentleman of capabilities, did not reside there, and probably had never visited the spot. Pearce proposed to Hopkins to run for the office ; he allowed himself to be put in nomination, and beat Turner, who knew not of opposition, just as he was putting forth his hand to seize the prize. The vote was unanimous for Hopkins, and Turner received some other district. Pearce went to San José for one purpose and accomplished another, while Hopkins came back a full-fledged Judge of a most important district.
The State of California was admitted into the Union September 9,
133
Political History of Napa County.
1850, and January 6, 1851, the second Legislature met at San José. Mar- tin E. Cook at this session represented the Eleventh Senatorial District, which was composed of the Counties of Sonoma, Solano, Napa, Marin, Colusa, Yolo and Trinity-in short, all that territory west of the Sacra- mento River, while in the Lower House Marin, Napa, Sonoma and Solano was represented by John A. Bradford and A. Stearns.
September 3, 1851, the first Gubernatorial election was held under the new order of things. In this contest, John Bigler, who received twenty- three thousand seven hundred and seventy-four votes in the State, against twenty-two thousand seven hundred and thirty-three got by P. B. Redding, his Whig opponent, had the assistance of that new power which had com- menced to creep into the State in the shape of the squatting element. He was democratic in his manners, being "hale-fellow" with all. Not so his opponent, who was a gentleman of more genteel bearing than the kind- hearted, unambitious, landless Governor, who was always mindful of his friends. Bigler, in all his messages, urged economy, but found it difficult to prevent an office being made for a friend. Tuthill remarks : " It was his pet project to unite the Southern and Western men of his party, and let the free-soilers shift for themselves ; but it is not in that direction that party cleavage runs. The Southerners scorned the alliance. They were ' high- toned,' and looked down upon a Missourian as little better than a man from Massachusetts. The Governor's project would not work. He carried water on both shoulders, and spilt very little on either side."
Passing now to the special subject in hand, we find that by the Act of March 11, 1851, Napa, Solano, Marin, Sonoma and Mendocino Counties were organized into the Seventh Judicial District. At this same session of the Legislature, Napa, Solano, Marin, Sonoma, Mendocino, Yolo, Colusa and Trinity were set apart as comprising the Eleventh Senatorial District. At the next session of the Legislature, May 18, 1853, a change was made in the Senatorial Districts, and the Counties of Napa, Solano and Yolo was organized into the Tenth District. The Act of April 1, 1864, placed Napa and Lake Counties in the Third Congressional District. Upon the organi- zation of Lake County, it was so arranged that Napa and Lake should elect an Assemblyman jointly, and both counties be represented by the Assem- blyman so elected. At this time the counties of Lake, Napa and Mendo- cino were organized into the Eighteenth Senatorial District. Matters re- mained thus until 1874, when a change was made which placed Napa, Lake and Sonoma Counties into a Senatorial District, which was designated as the Twentieth, and at the same time it was provided that Napa and Lake should each elect and be represented by an Assemblyman in each county, and that provision remains in force to the present time.
Mention has already been made of the Court of Sessions, and we find
134
History of Napa and Lake Counties-NAPA.
that the first Court was composed as follows: J. S. Stark, Judge, and Johnston Horrell and M. D. Ritchie, Associates.
The first general election in and for Napa County, was held April 1, 1850, with the following result: John S. Stark, County Judge; H. H. Lawrence, County Clerk ; N. McKimmey, Sheriff; R. L. Kilburn, Treasurer; J. P. Walker, Assessor ; J. E. Brown, Surveyor; and B. F. E. Kellogg, Coroner. Of these J. P. Walker, filed his official bond first, and his was, hence, the first official bond on record.
At the general election in 1855, the question of the prohibition of liquor was submitted to the people, and the result in Napa County was; Prohibition -yes, 198; Prohibition-no, 205. It was seen from this that the temper- ance sentiment of the people even at that early day was not so far behind what it is now. In fact, it is doubtful if the vote would be so close if it were submitted to the people to-day.
The vote for Governor at the election of 1855 was as follows : For Gov. J. Bigler, 261 ; for J. Neeley Johnson, 519; making a total vote of 780 in Napa County.
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.