USA > Massachusetts > Norfolk County > Braintree > Town annual report of Braintree, Massachusetts for the year 1936 > Part 6
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17
The fcat that the applicants are not subjected to an inquisition before the whole Board as is done in some towns is greatly to Brain- tree's credit. Such an inquisition is degrading and unnecessary. When, however, the process of application approaches the other ex- treme, of becoming so impersonal that an application is filled out to see what relief is obtainable or whether or not it may lead to a job, there results an unwarranted increase in relief expenditures and an unwarranted pauperization of people's spirits. A trained agent could do a great deal to prevent unnecessary applications and to make the wisest plans for those who need aid.
ROUTINE CHECK-UP OF PROPERTY
A trained person in charge of the office would have seen to it that in all cases routine inquiries were made' of banks as to deposits and withdrawals, of employers as to wages, and of assessors as to property owned. These verifications are made in some cases but not regaularly in all cases as a matter of routine. Most of the bank de- posits, wages and property assessments which we report above in the cases which we cite as unjustifiable or questionable, were found by our visitors and had not been discovered by the present unguided system. It is not likely that in the short study of three weeks our visitors found all the concealed resources. It requires constant effort throughout the year to secure sources of information. We did find several bank accounts of less than $100. which we have not mentioned in this report.
MAKING PLANS AND SECURING EMPLOYMENT
A competent agent would find ways of doing something about the social problems of some of the families aided. More should be done about health problems, the supervision of boarded children, and mak- ing plans about the whole family. For example in one family three different members were being aided with different forms of aid and there was no single plan.
While the visitors carry on some scattered attempts to find em- ployment there is no large effort directed toward the systematic handling of this problem. A card record of employable persons should be kept up and lists made monthly.
A competent agent would interest employers, a voluntary com- mittee like the Board of Trade, and would interest the U. S. Em- ployment Service to do everything possible for the employable per- sons listed. Our visitors cite several cases of young, employable men where employment guidance is essential to keep them from becoming pauperized.
63
THE TOWN INFIRMARY
Another evidence of the need for a skilled person in charge of the welfare department is the situation which exists in regard to the town infirmary. With eleven bedrooms on the men's side and eight in the women's side and a total capacity of forty, the infirmary has only ten residents, four of whom are employed on WPA work and pay for their board. A skilled person in charge of the department would either make more use of the infirmary or find some other way of caring for the few patients who remain. At present there seems to be very little relation between the Infirmary and the work which the visitors do with families.
ADEQUACY OF AID
The aid is given promptly and with a reasonable degree of ade- quacy. Relief should be adequate for the people who genuinely need It. If however, the adequate standard is maintained, the cost will be extravagant unless skilled persons use the greatest care in dealing with applications, investigating resources and with revisits check up on a plan that includes every possible effort of the applicant to help himself. In detail, the allowance for food compares favorably with approved budgets; the town pays reasonably adequate rents to the landlord, which is unusual; a very liberal policy in the payment of electric light bills has been force for at least two years; the allow- ance for fuel is liberal and medical needs are met on recommenda- tion of physicians. The town could take great satisfaction in this record if it could be sure that there was always enough planning, checking of needs and resources, and revisitation to prevent the sys- tem from being wasteful.
NEED FOR A COMPETENT AGENT
A competent agent would give to the town a continuous and con- sistent administration of welfare throughout all changes in boards. A competent agent would build up his own responsibility for deci- sions and be in a professional position to defend them against any individual's criticism. As it is at present, there is no one in a profes- sional position to take this responsibility and it is very difficult to know how far personal and political considerations enter into the granting of aid.
The following towns of between 10,000 and 20,000 population, according to latest available information, have Agents :- West Spring- field, Winthrop, Greenfield, Southbridge, Norwood, Dedham, Natick, Danvers, Winchester, Plymouth, Clinton Lexington, Swampscott, North Attleboro and Marblehead.
it seems to be generally agreed that it is essential to put some- one in charge of the department. This study shows conclusively that the director or agent' should be a person trained and experienced in this special kind of work. The position is important enough to de- mand all the skill and experience it is possible to secure. It is not enough to pick an honest man or a goodmanager. The work demands special knowledge and special qualifications. The closing of ten un- necessary cases at $6 a week would more than pay for the salary of a director. When the businss is wavering between $7,000 a month and $5,000 a month, it pays to get as much skill in the management of it as it is possible to secure.
64
FIRST RECOMMENDATION
We recommend therefore that the Board of Public Welfare be authorized to employ at such salary as the Finance Committee shall approve a competent agent with such qualifications as may be speci- fied by a special committee on welfare to be appointed by the Mod- erator.
NEED FOR A SEPARATE BOARD OF PUBLIC WELFARE
It may cause some surprise that we have in our first recommen- dation stipulated that the qualifications of the Agent be prescribed by and satisfactory to a special committee on Welfare. Our study shows very clearly that the department needs to be set up on a pro- fessional basis and that special study must be devoted to its reor- ganization. We believe that the Board of Selectmen who are now the Board of Public Welfare must recognize the need that this very large department get such special professional consideration. For the same reason, we recommend the creation of a separate Board of Public Welfare. The department should be set up on a professional basis with its separate and special task clearly recognized and sep- arately supervised by people whose function in the town government is to do nothing else but welfare work. We advocate the election at the next March meeting of a Board of Public Welfare separate from the Board of Selectmen and with different members.
The welfare department is large enough to require the attention of a separate board. All the important and necessary practices and policies mentioned in this report, and many other necessary ones, are too numerous and too technical for any Board to handle as a side line to more important work. The experience of the two different Boards of Selectmen whose terms are included within the last year and who have therefore fallen within the view of our study must, we believe, have convinced each of them that it would be desirable to delegate this difficult task to a separate board.
Such a distinct board could devote itself to a study of the wel- fare policies and practices; it could make sure that the agent admin- istered the policies in a professional way without political bias or personal favoritism; it would be responsible to the town for the size of the welfare appropriation; it could devise ways of co-operating with other boards and with private agencies; it could as a board of appeal ensure as fas as possible that the applicants were treated fairly and according to the best standards. Such separate boards, according to the latest available information, exist in the following towns of between 10,000 and 20,000 population - Milton, West Springfield, Wakefield, Greenfield, Southbridge, Dedham, Saugus, Mil- ford, Natick, Danvers, Winchester, Plymouth Needham, Stoneham, Athol, Reading, orthbridge, Swampscott, North Attleboro, Marble- head.
SECOND RECOMMENDATION
We recommend therefore that at the election in March a sep- arate Board of Public Welfare be elected, the members of which shall not be the same as the members of the Board of Selectmen.
RECOMMENDATIONS AS TO THE TOWN INFIRMARY
From what we have said above in regard to the Town Infirmary it must be clear that more study of cases by a skilled agent is necs- sary to determine whether the Infirmary should be more largely used or whether it should be closed. If the Town votes to authorize
65
the employment of a skilled Agent we recommend that he be allowed to study this matter before any decision is reached. If the Town should not accept our recommendation for an Agent we ask for longer time in which to report upon the question of closing the In- firmary.
APPENDIX A
The following tables bring together such information as is avail- able in regard to the trend of welfare costs during the depression, comparing Braintree with other towns of about the same size. The point about these tables which is of most importance in connection with this report is the great variation in the situation from month to month. Changes are frequent and sudden and there is great need for a skillful agent with a good system and a wise Board of Public Welfare which can gear the operation to the changes in private em- ployment and changes in WPA employment and can spend time enough upon the problems involved to gain some control over the situation.
TABLE 1 is a summary of the only monthly reports available. The Welfare Department has none of its own. It does make to the FERA and the WPA a report, chiefly of unemployment cases aided, which gives some idea of the trends. These figures cannot be made to agree with the total amount spent unless a complete audit of the books is made.
TABLE 2 compiled from records kept in the local WPA office, gives the best available information as to the number of persons on WPA payrolls. It is only approximate.
TABLE 3 gives the annual number of persons aided and the an- nual cost of aid in the home, comparing Braintree with eight towns of about the same population.
TABLE 4 compares the same towns as to the amount of federal funds expended for work relief since the beginning of federal aid.
TABLE 5 shows the trend of employment in manufacturing in- dustries since 1926 in the same towns.
W. HOMER MELVILLE RAY S. HUBBARD, Chairman WALLACE M. KEMP
66
TABLE 1.
Compiled from monthly reports made by the Braintree Board of Public Welfare to the FERA and the WPA
Active during month
New or Reopened
Closed
Obligations Incurred Unemployment Relief
1934
January
146
56
25
$ 4,196.61
February
438
70
134
8,236.99
March
285
73
92
5,665.35
April
224
91
129
4,811.62
May
153
58
92
2,881.73
June
128
48
69
2,662.94
July
112
43
41
2,109.32
August
104
35
49
2,875.99
September
89
34
32
2,081.49
October
92
35
20
2,078.66
November
146
80
58
3,667.26
December
142
.63
73
4,369.10
$ 45,637.06
1935
January
138
68
41
2,970.57
February
136
44
28
3,260.59
March
152
48
48
4,597.13
April
118
28
40
3,302.56
May
134
47
61
4,142.66
June
111
31
28
2,914.85
July
126
47
5
3,426.95
August
148
33
52
3,744.33
September
122
32
33
3,222.48
October
164
77
22
4,385.05
November
219
79
15
5,129.50
December
269
73
17
7,611.31
$ 48,707.989
1936
Janaury
278
44
18
6,466.68
February
258
35
44
6,852.37
March
285
33
37
5,949.64
April
218
22
48
4,886.22
May
233
38
16
7,076.82
June
214
32
50
5,483.91
July
178
15
51
5,414.71
August
202
24
34
5,552.84
September
163
18
23
4,538.99
October
146
28
45
4,363.74
$ 56,585.92
67
TABLE 2.
Approximate number of persons on WPA Payrolls Compiled from records of the Braintree WPA Office
1935
December
11 279
19
275
26
275
31. 278
January 8 224
15
192
February
1.
201
8.
205
13.
209
29
197
March
7
174
14
185
21
192
28
192
April
4.
280
11.
248
24
148
May
1.
146
29.
268
June
6.
282
13
259
20
255
27
250
July
3.
242
11
244
18
242
25
243
August
1
244
8.
238
22
239
29
233
Spt. 5.
231
26
231
October
3. 263
10
259
17
306
24.
269
31
264
1936
TABLE 3. From Annual Reports of the State Department of Public Welfare
Persons aided during year ending March 31
Cost of supporting or relieving persons in their own homes-year ending December 31
Population
1933-34
1934-35
19 35-36
1933
1934
1935
Weymouth
21,748
3,810
2,981
2,713
$256,789
$134,946
$139,453
Milton
18,147
306
387
348
8,825
8,895
5,273
Braintree
17,122
2,007
1,079
1,973
82,690
47,491
51,334
W. Springfield
17,118
1,324
2,441
3,606
225,628
112,082
88,966
Winthi op
17,001
677
737
858
30,436
30,142
34,129
Wakefield
16,494
1,991
2,175
2,357
80,738
33,271
39,579
Norwood
15,574
1,157
726
849
43,892
29,466
30,800
Dedham
15,371
2,698
2,201
2,495
167,180
128,632
138,651
TABLE 4. Amount of Federal Funds Expended for Emergency, Direct and Work Relief from July, 1933 to June 13, 1936
Commodities
Oct. 1, 1934
to June 1, 1936
Grand Totals
Weymouth
$71,310
$105,475
$442,507
$201,347
$54,645
$875,284
Milton
12,282
68,671
191,240
82,610
20,722
375,525
Braintree
44,053
91,628
299,145
115,720
38,853
589,399
W. Springfield
61,437
169,413
467,788
209,536
84,558
992,732
Winthrop
12,579
75,924
367,213
147,421
53,450
656,587
Wakefield
32,028
101,549
430,005
155,048
40,022
758,652
Norwood
24,235
63,371
257,544
104,021
30,817
479,988
Dedham
51,587
91,543
282,356
148,867
64,798
639,151
Direct Relief
1933-1934
CWA
Program
Nov. 1933 to
Apr. 1, 1934
Work Program
to May, 1936
Earnings
Oct. 1, 1935
to June 13, 1936
Value of
Distributed
Grants
ERA
April 1934
WPA
TABLE 5. From Massachusetts Annual Census of Manufacturers
Population
Weymouth 21,748
Milton 18,147
Braintree 17,122
W. Springfield 17,118
Winthrop 17,001
Wakefield 16,494
Norwood 15,574
Dedham 15,371
Average Number Employed
1926
1,931
31
1,656
2,710
40
1,770
2,666
529
1927
1,986
21
1,503
2,434
43
1,541
2,753
462
1928
1,783
37
1,462
2,707
51
1,478
2,551
384
1929
1,635
31
1,870
3,325
49
1,469
2,666
336
1930
1,447
62
1,455
2,869
47
1,334
2,396
292
1931
1,174
38
1,288
2,199
37
1,080
2,217
177
1932
937
43
1,054
1,529
42
582
2,033
78
1933
766
34
1,099
1,782
36
932
2,181
126
1934
833
57
1,276
2,096
40
985
2,484
146
Amount of Wages Paid
1926
$2,310,183
$43,683
$1,805,191
$4,182,149
$47,327
$2,011,873
$3,975,686
$585,593
1927
2,397,192
29,891
1,729,253
3,567,835
55,228
1,583,011
4,048,168
516,253
1928
2,013,718
52,310
1,825,203
4,096,581
61,816
1,693,452
3,873,833
473,171
1929
1,938,669
37,276
2,627,289
5,187,510
62,639
1,678,024
4,070,549
364,498
1930
1,494,032
94,615
/ 1,926,918
4,540,608
58,571
1,546,161
3,531,684
344,771
1931
1,248,046
54,585
1,592,499
2,542,096
47,809
980,453
3,105,748
169,594
1932
815,164
63,404
1,067,080
2,707,913
55,781
483,146
2,521,955
95,218
1933
718,960
40,753
1,043,702
1,830,607
28,698
658,817
2,373,502
99,402
1934
906,409
66,939
1,378,125
2,233,952
39,982
845,019
2,926,028
136,512
70
ARTICLE 1. (Continued)
Mr. Fitzgerald stated that the committee should be complimented by the citizens of the Town for presenting this very comprehensive report in such a short space of time, and offered the following motion :-
Moved: That the Board fo Public Welfare be authorized to appoint an agent at such salary as may be agreed upon by the Board and the Finance Committee. In appointing said agent, the Board shall select a person whose experience, training and qualifications conform to specifications to be laid down by a committee of three appointed by the Moderator; and the agent shall take office if and when his qualifications are approved by the said committee.
Moved: The Previous Question. Carried 9:17.
Motion offered by Mr. Fitzgerald - Carried 9:20.
ARTICLE 2.
Mr. R. B. Woodsum moved: That the Treasurer, with the ap- proval of the Selectmen, be and hereby is authorized to borrow for ordinary maintenance expenses of the town the sum of $35,000.00, but in no event a sum in excess of the amount of tax titles taken or held by the town, and to issue a note or notes of the town therefor, all in accordance with theprovisionsofChapter 49 of the Acts of 1933, as most recently amended by Chapter 281 of the Acts of 1936. The said sum of $35,000.00 is hereby appropriated for the Public Welfare epartment, for the following uses:
For the salary of a Welfare epartment Administrator or Agent for the month of December, 1936 . . $ 208.33
For unpaid bills of other Cities and Towns, Tempo- rary Aid Account 9,037.45
For unpaid bills, Temporary Aid Account 14,563.97 For Temporary Aid for the balance of the year 1936 10,000.00 For Mothers' Aid for the balance of the year 1936 . 1,190.25
$ 35,000.00
The Vote being doubted, the Moderator appointed the following Tellers: Messrs. Jenkins, Spring, Arnold, Ryan, Hale, Pearson, Bes- tick and Hitchcock.
There being 98 in the affirmative and 24 in the negative, the motion was carried - 9:35.
ARTICLE 3.
Mr. R. B. Woodsum moved: That the sum of $3,000.00 be ap- propriated for Old Age Assistance, the same to be transferred from the Surplus - Revenue Account. Cariedr 9:36.
Mr. R. B. Woodsum moved: That the report of the committee submitted under ARTICLE 1 be printed in the Annual Town Report. Carried 9:38.
ARTICLE 4.
Moved: That the Town accept as a Town Way, Brewster Ave- nue, so-called, from Arbutus Avenue to Standish Avenue, as approved by the Board of Survey, and laid out by the Selectmen. Carried 9:39.
71
ARTICLE 5.
Moved : That the Town accept as a Town Way, a portion of Standish Avenue, from the point already accepted by the Town, to Brewster Avenue, as approved by the Board of Survey, and laid out by the Selectmen. Carried 9:40.
Mr. Woodsum moved to adjourn - So voted 9:40 P. M. A true copy. Attest:
ERNEST C. WOODSUM Town Clerk.
72
ORDER FOR STATE WIDE RECOUNT FOR LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OFFICE OF HE SECRETARY
BOSTON.
To City and Town Clerks and Election Commissioners.
WHEREAS,-petitions have been filed with the State Secre- tary, in the interest of Leverett Saltonstall of Newton, Republican candidate for the office of Lieutenant Governor, for state-wide re- counts of ballots cast at the election held November 3, 1936, for the office of Lieutenant Governor, under the provisions of General Laws, chapter 54, section 135 ,as amended; and
WHEREAS,-after the official tabulation of votes by the Gov- ernor and Council it appears that the difference in the number of votes cast for the two leading candidates for said office of Lieuten- ant Governor is less than one per cent of the total number of votes cast for such office ;
THEREFORE it bcomes my duty to, and I do hereby, order the clerk of each city and town of the commonwealth to transmit forth- with, and said clerk shall so transmit, the envelopes containing the ballots, sealed, to hte registrars of the city of town who shall, with- out unnecessary delay, open the envelopes, recount the ballots cast for said office and determine the questions raised.
Very truly yours, (Signed) FREDERIC W. COOK
Secretary.
A true copy. Attest:
ERNEST C. WOODSUM
Town Clerk.
RECOUNT FOR LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR
December 2, 1936.
In compliance with the foregoing order, all candidates for the office of Lieutenant Governor and the Republican and Democratic State Committees were duly notified, as required by law.
Wednesday, December 2, 1936 at 8:30 o'clock in the forenoon was the date and time set for recount.
The following officers served under the supervision of the Board of Registrars.
PRECINCT 1. J. Frank Lane and John B. Dyer.
PRECINCT 2. Joseph W. Sullivan and Grace M. Blake.
PRECINCT 3. William C. Brooks and John J. Barrett, Jr.
The result was as follows:
Total ballots cast
Original 8493
Recount
8491
73
PRECINCT OFFICERS' RETURNS:
Henning A. Blomen (SL)
8
4
8
20
Freeman W. Follett (P)
6
7
13
26
Walter S. Hutchins (S)
11
16
30
57
Frances E. Kelly (D)
1028
602
1046
2676
Leverett Saltonsall (R)
1426
2383
1548
5357
Paul C. Wicks (C)
11
2
3
16
Blanks
124
65
152
341
2614*
3079*
2800
8493
RECOUNT BY BOARD OF REGISTRARS: Henning A. Blomen (SL) 7
5
7
19
Freeman W. Follett (P)
6
4
10
20
Walter S. Hutchins (S)
13
18
35.
66
Francis E. Kelly (D)
1027
606
1065
2698
Leverett Saltonstall (R)
1422
2374
1557
5353
Paul C. Wicks (C)
11
0
3
14
Blanks
127
71
123
321
2613*
3078
2800
8491
*The Board of Registrars found 2613 ballots cast in Precinct 1 and 3078 ballots cast in Precinct 2, whereas the Election Officers re- ported 2614 ballots cast in Precinct 1 and 3079 in Precinct 2.
A true copy. Attest :
ERNEST C. WOODSUM
Town Clerk.
74
Births in 1936
JANUARY
Date Name
4 Rose Marie Cambria
5 Barbara Ann LeVangie
Daid Arthur Blunt
S Carole Ann Dockendorff
9 Mary McNear Pitcher
10 Francis John Coulstring
13
Leo Benjamin Boudreau, Jr.
13 Donna ifowland
15 Carol Jean Morrison
16 Barbara Joan Ruddy
19 Eugene Andrew Elliott
23 Thomas Crawford Smith
24 Virginia Mae Toomey
24 Robert Allen Gustafson
28 Paul Conrad Newman
29 Dorothy Beatrice Huntly
30 Shirley Anne Gallagher
30 Stillborn
81 Roberta Millicent Spain
Parents' Names
Joseph and Josephine Edmund J. and Esther A. David A. and Gladys H. William S. and Hazel F. John M. and Harriet Alexander M. and Muriel I. Leo B. and Bertha A. Dudley P. and Pearl B. Reginald A. and Martha J. James J. and Elizabeth Harry G. and Muriel F. David H. and Pauline James T. and Rose William H. and Hazel B. Charles J. and Katherine Lowell and Ella James F. and Helen F.
Stanley and Cora
FEBRUARY
3 Edith Louise Ladner
4 Joanne Alice Kent
5 Virginia Frances Correnti
6 Leonard Thomas Surette
6 Philip Lawrence Hardy
7 Robert Paul Rathbun
10 Mary Evelyn Fraser
13 Thomas Alexander Stalker
14 Elaine Louis Cicchini
15 Carole Jean Tower
19 John Charles Golden
19 Donald Joyce
22 Martha Benoit Boudreau
23 Serge Gonzales
24 Vera May Pitts
25 Allan Edward Jordan
26 John Joseph White
26 Sara Sibley
9 Bruce Raymond La Vangie
Elmer M. and Frances M. Walter F. and Catherine E. Vincenti and Mary Leonard A. and Esther P. Oral A. and Edna M. Paul M. and Edna A. Ernest S. and Helen W. Robert J. and Helen E. Frank M. and Louise M. Burton H. and Eleanor M. George A. and Mary C. Harry J. and Ruth G. Peter E. and Bertha M. Rodolfo and Dorothy Walter H. and Annie E. Edward W. and Elsie V. Arthur J. and Alma M. Arthur H. and Helen Raymond W. and Ethel C.
MARCH
2 Illegitimate
2 Barbara Repoff
2 Alan Foster Woodruff
4 Henry Sofus Larsen
4 Cecilia Elizabeth Woelfel
9 Jane Ellen Flaherty
13 John Edwin Gallivan
George W. and Florence M. Luman A. and Doris Harry S. and Elizabeth S. Francis E. and Cecilia E. Joseph W. and Elizabeth M. John J. and Dorothy W. 1
75
Date Name
14 Sandra Joyce Richardson
14 David Drummey
15 Patricia Elizabeth Curry
15 Barbara Louise Glidden
17 Barbara Patricia Mann
19 Illegitimate
19 Joseph James Carty
24 Joseph Goulding
29 Frederick Melvin Dosenberg
Parents' Names
Charles V. and Dorothy B. Christopher A. and Florence M. Francis J. and Doris L. John R. and Miriam I. Norman H. and Josephine
Joseph J. and Eliza Joseph P. and Helen R. Frederick A. and Mildred P.
APRIL
7 Gordon Frank. Holbrook
8 Barbara Rose Mauk
8 Fay Ann Pinault
9 Kenneth Shepherd MacDonald, Jr.
9 Donald Angus McInnis
10 Douglas Edward Hart
12 Salvatore Joseph Recupero
18 Bernadette Ann McCusker
Warren Addison Rand
19 20 21 22 Nancy Lee Johnson Dunn Gerald Francis Hamilton Betty Louise Bullock
John David Burns Mary Beverly Heaney
25 26 26 27 28 30 Priscilla Helen Brown 30 Kathryn Ellen Thomas
30 Nancy Loring Decker
Lowell S. and Viola F. James F. and Louise N. Norris H. and Josephine G. Kenneth S. and Olive K. Alexander and Julianne John and Catherine Antonio and Rosevia Matthew B. and Mabel E. Fred E. and Lillian S. Donald E. and Madeline E. Thomas L. and Mary A. Harold L. and Violet I. Percival L. and Ruth A. Harold C. and Helen F. William M. and Abbie L. Milton and Laura L. Christopher C. and Mary E. Robert J. and Helen Alfred J. and Marion A. Frederick W. and Florence
MAY
3 Thelma June McDonald Norma Joan McDonald
3
4 Kenneth Edward Hall
5
Alexander Martin Canavan
5 George Theodore Canavan
6 Robert Reed
7 Bevery Ann Hatch
10 Mary Louise Soule 11 Richard Rodenhurst Barnes
12 Arthur Joseph Doiron
Robert Joseph Casey
Albert Henry Holbrook, Jr.
13 14 15 Alberta Hipson Illegitimate
15 16 Charles Edward Tower
16 Francesco Colantonio, Jr.
19 Bradford Whall Walker
20 Frederick Martin Townsend
27 Richard Frederick Klay
31 Kenneth Lee Currier 31 Judith Brown
31 John Francis Hennedy
Donald and Agnes Donald and Agnes Alexander and Bertha E. John J. and Doris F. John J. and Doris F. Nelson G. and Elizabeth F. Edward H. and Lillian M. Ralph M. and Thelma Richard M. and Isobel M. Arthur J. and Marguerite Joseph F. and Mary Albert H. and Louise P. John E. and Dorothy A.
Horace S. and Florence Francesco and Angela Deane R. and Natalie R. Frederick M. and Phyllis Frederick J. and Doris L. Bradford and Margaret S. Daniel A. Jr. and Dorothy F. John F. and Geraldine M.
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.