Town annual report of the officers and committees of the town of Scituate 1955-1957, Part 44

Author: Scituate (Mass.)
Publication date: 1955-1957
Publisher: The Town
Number of Pages: 810


USA > Massachusetts > Essex County > Saugus > Town annual report of the officers and committees of the town of Scituate 1955-1957 > Part 44


Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).


Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45 | Part 46


B. On the Playground


1. Keep grounds safe for play by removing harmful ob- jects


2. Do not run out into the street after balls


3. Do not throw snowballs on playground or to and from school


4. Do not bring to school articles which may cause accidents


5. Avoid strenuous play - younger children frequently try to compete with older children and fail to realize that they cannot play as hard as older children. Sometimes they get hurt.


III In the Community


A. Respect for Authority.


1. Respect for, and confidence in police


2. Regard rights of others, don't push in crowds, etc.


B. On the Street


1. Do not loiter on the way home


2. Obey traffic officer's signals promptly


3. Walk between white lines when crossing over to the other side


4. Stop and look in both directions for passing cars when an officer is not on duty


5. Take care of younger children


6. Walk on sidewalks


7. Do not run from behind parked cars


8. Do not ask for, nor accept, rides from strangers.


13


SCHOOL COMMITTEE REPORT


Physical Examinations


Before entering school, your child should have a physical and dental examination and any defects found should be corrected if possible in order that the child enter school in the best physical condition attainable. Such untreated handicaps can seriously retard mental and social development.


The periodic health examination of each school child by the school physician is a "screening" examination to find signs of trou- ble that might not have been recognized before. Lack of time pre- vents complete study of each child. Where serious defect is found, the child should be taken to the doctor of the family's choice, or to a clinic, for more adequate diagnosis, and for treatment. The school physician also examines children sent to him by teachers or the school nurse, for special attention.


14


SCHOOL COMMITTEE REPORT


DIRECTORY OF SCITUATE PUBLIC SCHOOLS


SCHOOL COMMITTEE


Fred T. Waterman, Chairman


1960


Mrs. Doris D. Ward, Secretary


1958


1959


A. William Krause, Jr. Mrs. Ellen M. Sides George C. Young


1959


1960


-0-


Edward K. Chace, A.M.


Judson R. Merrill, B.A.


Superintendent of Schools Administrative Assistant


JUNIOR-SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL


Edward L. Stewart, M.Ed.


Stuart E. Crapser, A.B.


Miss Doris I. Annis, B.S. Clarence O. Atkinson, B.S.


Mrs. Mary K. Baker, M.S. Mrs. Mary Bauer, B.S.


Dominic J. Bonanno, B.S. Miss Eleanor Brown, A.B. Robert D. Burgess, Diploma Mario Catinella, M.A. Mrs. Beatrice Coleman, B.S.


Mrs. Ruth J. Cote, B.S.


Mrs. Dorothy H. Croker, B.A. Miss Sally M. Donovan, A.B. Miss Bessie Dudley, A.B. A. Leslie Faulkner, B.S.


Paul F. Finnegan, M.A. John J. Gibbons, B.S. Miss Eleanor Gile, Ed.M.


Principal


Assistant Principal, Science


English (Central School)


Business Education, Driver Education, Director of Audio- Visual Aids


Home Economics


Physical Education


Shop Chairman Languages, French Shop French, Latin


Home Economics; Chairman


Home Economics, Shop, Art Science Spanish, French


Latin, English


Chairman English


Chairman Business Education; Driver Education


Social Studies


English, Social Studies Librarian


15


SCHOOL COMMITTEE REPORT


Miss Elizabeth Giles, B.S. Mrs. Margaret Hamilton, A.B. Leon R. Harvey, Ed.M. Miss Ruth Hawkes, Ed.M. William Johnson, B.S. Lawrence C. Keenan, B.Ed. Sally Ann Kennedy, M.A.


Barbara Murphy, Ed.M.


Charles Rathclement, B.S. Alma Shmauk, B.S.


Edward Elliott Small, B.S.


Patrick A. Soccorso, A.B. Ella Vinal, M.A.


Edgar L. White, Jr., B.S. Erroll K. Wilcox, B.S.


Mathematics English Science


Business Education


Chairman Mathematics


Science, Social Studies


English, Social Studies


English, Guidance


Social Studies (Central School)


Art, Mechanical Drawing Mathematics


Mathematics


Chairman Social Studies


Science (Central School) Chairman Science


ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS


Thomas E. Abbott, B.Ed.


Judson R. Merrill, B.A. Charles E. Bordne, A.M.


Joseph C. Driscoll, M.Ed.


William A. Lincoln, M.Ed.


Guido J. Risi, B.S.


Miss Mary R. Agnew, B.A. Miss Frances M. Byrnes, B.S. Edward J. Bielski, M.Ed.


Mrs. Catherine F. Callahan, Diploma Miss Ethel V. Clayton, B.R.E. Mrs. Justine Cook, B.A. Robert J. Corbin, B.S. Mrs. Eleanor P. Costello, B.S. Mrs. Helen C. Curtis, B.S. Robert E. Deakin, B.S. Miss Jean M. Feeley, Diploma Mrs. Edith L. Fennessy, B.L.I.


Principal, Central and Wampatuck Schools Principal, Jenkins School Assistant Principal Central School, Mathematics Assistant Principal Central School, Social Studies


Assistant Principal, Wampatuck


School, 6th Grade Assistant Principal, Wampatuck School, 6th Grade Cadet Teacher


Grade 1, Central School


Grade 6, Jenkins School, Director Evening Vocational School


Grade 5, Jenkins School Grade 3, Wampatuck School Grade I, Central School Grade 6, Jenkins School Grade 3, Wampatuck School Grade 2, Wampatuck School Grade 4, Central School Grade 1, Central School Grade 2, Wampatuck School


16


SCHOOL COMMITTEE REPORT


Miss Rose M. Fisher, Diploma Miss Marion Fleck, Diploma


Grade 2, Jenkins School Kindergarten-Central


Mrs. Madalin C. Ford, CertificateGrade 3, Central School Mrs. Mary E. Gardner, B.S .*


Kindergarten-Wampatuck School Mrs. Jane Gillingham, Diploma Grade 1, Jenkins School Mrs. Grace Grassie, Diploma Grade 1, Wampatuck School Grade 3, Jenkins School Mrs. Flora D. Harvey, B.S. Mrs. Mary Heffernan, Diploma


Grade 1, Jenkins School Mrs. Margaret E. Hoey, CertificateGrade 1, Central School Miss Florence Hyde, B.S. Miss Priscilla Kelley, Diploma Mrs. Dorothy D. Kettell, B.S. Mrs. Margaret Leach, Diploma Grade 2, Central School Mrs. Edna Locklin, Diploma Mrs. Grace Lull, Diploma Mrs. Winifred McAuliffe, Diploma


Grade 2, Central School Grade 1, Wampatuck School Grade 4, Central School


Kindergarten, Wampatuck School Grade 6, Central School


Mrs. Doris Mckinlay, B.S .*


Grade 3, Jenkins School Grade 4, Wampatuck School


Grade 4, Jenkins School Grade 5, Central School Grade 6, Jenkins School Physical Education-All Schools Grade 2-Wampatuck School Kindergarten-Jenkins School


Mrs. Eileen C. Menslage, Diploma Grade 5, Jenkins School Mrs. Alice Merz, M.Ed. Mrs. Vera Mitchell, Diploma Miss Mary E. Monahan, B.S. Mrs. Anna E. Murphy, Diploma Mrs. Helen M. O'Connor, B.S. Mrs. Florence O'Hern, Diploma Miss Marguerite O'Hern, Diploma Mrs. Virginia M. O'Neil, B.S. Mrs. Kathryn H. Pilot, M.Ed. Mrs. Doris Reddy, Diploma Mrs. Vera Reublinger, Diploma Miss Gertrude Reynolds, M.B. Mrs. Joan M. Sampson, B.S. Mrs. Barbara Sargent, B.S. Mark A. Swift, B.S. Mrs. Rose Trefry, Certificate Mrs. Madeline Vickery, Diploma Miss Gertrude Ward, Diploma Miss Eleanor Wescott, Diploma Mrs. Gladys I. Wiswall, Diploma Grade 2, Wampatuck School


Grade 4, Wampatuck School Grade 4, Wampatuck School Grade 2, Jenkins School Grade 3, Central School Grade 4, Jenkins School Vocal Music Grade 5, Wampatuck School Grade 5, Central School Grade 6, Central School Opportunity Class, Central School Grade 2, Jenkins School Grade 1, Jenkins School Grade 5, Central School


*On leave 1957-1958.


17


SCHOOL COMMITTEE REPORT


SUPERVISORS


Herschel Benson, M.S. Mrs. Helene Fulton, Diploma Miss Ann Louise Hoar, B.A. Robert E. Morrill, B.S. Mrs. Gertrude L. Russell, Diploma Samuel J. Tilden, Ed.M.


Director of Physical Education Supervisor of Art Speech Therapist (part time) Director of Music


Coordinator of Reading Director of Guidance


HEALTH OFFICERS


Max D. Miles, M.D.


*W. B. Parsons, D.D.S.


School Physician School Dentist Hygienist


* Mrs. Lillian Higgins Miss Margaret J. O'Donnell, R.N. Nurse, Central and Wampatuck Schools


Mrs. Flora D. White, R.N.


Nurse, High and Jenkins Schools


*Employed by Board of Health


SUPERVISORS OF ATTENDANCE


William F. Kane, Chief of Police Miss Margaret J. O'Donnell Mrs. Flora D. White


All Schools Central and Wampatuck Schools Jenkins and High Schools


SECRETARIES


Mrs. Marguerite E. Cahoon Mrs. Emily Colton


Mrs. Dorothy Foster Mrs. Muriel Johnson


Mrs. Jean E. Strzelecki


Mrs. Martha Thompson Mrs. Doris Walker


Superintendent's Office Central School Office


Jenkins School


Superintendent's Office


High School


Wampatuck School High School


CAFETERIAS


Mrs. Gertrude Timpany, Supervisor


Miss Annie Barry, Manager


Mrs. Genevieve Hill Mrs. Irene Johnson


Mrs. Giertrug McCarthy Mrs. Mae Stark


All Schools


High School


High School


High School


High School


High School


18


SCHOOL COMMITTEE REPORT


Mrs. Florence James, Manager Mrs. Harriet E. Bubin


Central School


Central School


Mrs. Margaret McCormack


Central School


Mrs. Agnes C. Peirce


Central School


Mrs. Margaret Rice


Central School


Mrs. Bessie M. Dooley, Manager


Jenkins


Mrs. Enid Billings


Jenkins


Mrs. Florence Flaherty


Jenkins


Mrs. Ann Fettig


Jenkins


Mrs. Roberta Merritt, Manager


Wampatuck


Mrs. Connie Saccone


Wampatuck


Mrs. Gertrude Queeney


Wampatuck


Mrs. Florence Young


Wampatuck


CUSTODIANS


Herbert E. Bearce


Head Custodian and High School


John A. Cogswell


High School


Daniel E. Healy


High School


Percy Mayo


High School


Thomas F. Woods


High School


Earl Jenkins


Central


William F. Harrington


Central


Harry Soule


Central


John F. Curran


Jenkins


Joseph Murphy


Jenkins


Francis W. Hartnett Lewis B. Newcomb


Wampatuck


Wampatuck


BUS CONTRACTORS


Alfred Elliott


Route A


Andrew Finnie


Route B


William Mays


Route C


C. Alan Merry


Route D


Route E


William Steverman Richard S. Tibbetts


Route F


Lissie Berg


Route G


James Finnie Henry Bearce, Jr.


Route H


Route J


19


REPORT OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS


THE HANDWRITING ON THE WALL: "No," said the little girl forcefully, "I do not want to get good marks. I'll be laughed at by my friends. None of my friends get good marks. If you get good marks, you just don't fit with the crowd."


Maybe you haven't made this contact yet, or if you have, per- haps, you have rationalized it away by saying that it's a phase, that we all went through it, that it will pass.


As an educator with some thirty years of experience with boys and girls, I tell you that it is not a phase, that it will not pass, not until you and I do something about it.


Perhaps your little Mary or Johnnie is the exception. Perhaps he DOES like to get good marks; perhaps he IS interested in learn- ing and thinking because they mean something to him. But are you sure that he isn't being ostracised and laughed at because he is different from "the crowd"?


What I am talking about is not peculiar to Scituate. Any school man or woman will tell you the same things. Some of them will tell you that they are thinking of leaving teaching because children no longer want to learn.


We, as parents and school people can shrug and say that all school systems are afflicted in the same way, and what can we do (meaning we can't do anything)?


But we as parents and teachers can do something here in Scituate. The handwriting is on the wall. A generation of adults who shun intellectual activity, stultified by adherence to the criteria for the mediocre, will be the alternative unless we do something now.


WHAT IS WRONG WITH AMERICAN EDUCATION?


First, we do not train for mental work and we teach too little.


One of the first duties of a school is to train pupils to work with their heads, a habit which must be started in the lower grades. Our high schools seldom force the pupil to make a serious effort nor do they accustom him to systematic, constant hard work. Most troubles college freshmen experience are the result of half-hearted high school training.


20


SCHOOL COMMITTEE REPORT


Parents and teachers appear to be increasingly reluctant to make a child do the things which they believe to be right. In the home, democratic discussions among all the family members have too often become free license in which a child "tells off" his parents and the parents appear not only to take it -- but like it!


The adolescent desires guidance and needs direction. He feels insecure and confused when the decisions are left to him, despite the brave front he may often assume. Parents and teachers increas- ingly shirk the job of setting a pattern for their children and fail to give them the essential support and direction they need.


We protect, direct, and support the child with physical care. Why can we not in a like manner administer to the child's emo- tional and intellectual needs?


Systematic hard work in the early years will increase a child's confidence in his own mental powers and will help him accumulate and digest knowledge easily. All of us are familiar with the child's eagerness to learn in grades 1, 2, and 3. Each of us is familiar with something which happens after grade 3. He no longer loves school. He professes to hate it. He, in most cases, does just enough to get by. Again this attitude is no temporary phase to be shrugged off.


A stiff program plus demands on time and effort will stimulate and encourage the pupil in grades 1 through 12.


Have you seen bright pupils become bored, discouraged, and restless because so little is required of them? Which teachers do you remember most fondly? Are they not the ones who did more than merely keep you amused ?. Were they not the ones who really taught you something - the ones who were tough yet fair?


The acquisition of knowledge is a serious, time-consuming business. It takes more than a few forty-minute periods a day, five days a week. Learning never stops with the school bell. Yet too many of our pupils think that it does. Could it be that our teachers too seldom relate what they teach with life? Could it be that too many teachers teach with an eye on the clock and an ear on the bell, and that pupils get the idea from their teachers that learning is something which takes place only during the brief school hours principally because teacher by example appears to think the same thing?


HOMEWORK? Our schools appear to be so afraid of taxing pupils' time and energy that they do not dare to give them much homework, and what they give is usually of the superficial type,


21


SCHOOL COMMITTEE REPORT


consisting mainly in repeating what has been learned in class. Homework should require effort and the exchange of ideas with others. Then, too, we still find the teacher who gives homework as a penalty. "All right, Freddie," he says, "for that you will do 200 problems tonight!" Probably little Freddie will not misbehave in that way again, but his love of arithmetic or science will have dimin- ished because homework has become the club used to beat him into good behaviour.


Should we allow youngsters to choose their own courses? I often wonder. Are these adolescents mature enought to decide in- telligently what is best to study, and to take on themselves the task of choosing a course of study which will affect their lives?


The European child has no subject choices. But he does have a comprehensive, stable curriculum which takes up the important subjects gradually at the logical time. Native language, mathe- matics, natural sciences, history (in a meaningful, chronological order), and geography are studied every year and the pupil pro- gresses in them gradually and logically. Other subjects come when a sound groundwork has been laid. When he has finished second- ary school, he has a firm grounding in the essential elements of his cultural and scientific heritage; he knows how to use his mind, and he is ready for advanced, specialized study at the university.


Our high schools can be compared with cafeterias, offering discreet fragments of modern knowledge, not related to each other, not grounded on any serious common foundation, and changing their bill-of-fare at every twist and turn of popular fad and fashion. The pupil makes his selection from. courses reputed to be amusing or easy or which might possibly have immediate practical value. He is likely to avoid those requiring much work and long prepara- tion (including mathematics and sciences). He is often allowed to take the courses in any order he wishes. He is seldom called upon to note the common foundations and interrelationships as well as essential common problems in various subjects. He spends little time on each. He skims but does not master. Perhaps our secondary school departmentalization is responsible. Reluctance of science, mathematics, and history teachers to stress grammar rhetoric, and punctuation; of English teachers to stress the vocabularies of science and mathematics; the constant complaint of language teachers that English teachers do not teach grammar, are examples which might well cause the pupil to think that there is no relationship between subject fields.


22


SCHOOL COMMITTEE REPORT


HIGH SCHOOLS FAIL IN PREPARING PUPILS FOR COLLEGE IN THESE WAYS:


(1) Some pupils cannot read college textbooks. High School teachers very often refuse to shoulder any responsibility for teach- ing reading. It is much easier to shift the blame to the elementary school teachers. If a pupil cannot read his high school texts, how can he read college texts?


(2) Pupils cannot follow main arguments or find the central point in what they read because they have not been trained to do so. Once upon a time, when I taught college preparatory English, I required all my youngsters to study Edmund Burke's "Speech on Conciliation with America". No longer does anyone require it. Yet no greater example of clear, systematic thinking exists. Gone is the joy of following argument and evidence to a conclusion. We read tid-bits instead, little gems which might grace the bedside table in a guest room.


(3) Pupils cannot express themselves either in writing or in oral expression. Clear, concise English is a fundamental tool. What have we done with it?


(4) Ignorance of anything which was not a part of some course. A potential college freshman should have read, literally, hundreds of books: not just fiction: but all manner of non-fiction. He should be steeped in background which comes only from reading. Did you ever check the reading requirements of Phillips Academy or Phillips-Exeter?


(5) Hopelessly inadequate orientation in the ways of college practice: (a) note taking; (b) source material use; (c) freedoni from someone (teacher or parent) sitting over a pupil requiring him to do this or that at any set time; (d) no instruction in how to study, how to concentrate, how to get rid of people nicely so that one can study, how to make friends, how to budget one's time between studies and activities, and so on.


(6) Failure to develop active, critical, inquisitive minds. Our democratic discussions stress questions but not substance. We pro- vide students with slogans, generalities, and formulas by which to judge and criticise- but we are slighting badly the knowledge which alone makes criticism meaningful.


WHAT MUST WE DO? First, we must re-evaluate and re- align our curriculum so as to make inter-relationships of subject fields meaningful. We must stop immediately "text-book" teaching.


23


SCHOOL COMMITTEE REPORT


If we could throw away the textbooks, we would teach better. Some of our teachers might quit, but that might be just as well. A test could be made. If you cannot teach without a textbook, you are teaching badly. The textbook should be the reference book, but never the curriculum guide.


Second, we must set up a program of studies for the college- bound which will really prepare them for college.


Third, we must work with parents and pupils to see to it that the potential college pupil goes to college.


Fourth, we much teach the pupil how to think, how to study, how to concentrate, how to outline, how to take notes from what he reads, how to find the basic thought in a paragraph.


Fifth, we must stop clock-watching, bell-listening, and text- book teaching.


Sixth, we must set patterns of study and homework which are stiff, comprehensive and meaningful.


Seventh, we must bear down on our bright pupils. We must re-evaluate our teaching so that pupils no longer merely memorize disparate facts and ready-made generalizations which can be regur- gitated in the test or examination. We must award independent thinking (and I underline that word).


The regular high school academic course should become the purveyor to the college, admitting its students selectively, and treating them as potential creative scholars, scientists, engineers, or administrators.


Other courses should train the others.


Eighth, we must learn how to enrich a course, how to make it more meaningful through more than the minimum essentials such as one would expect from the average student. In that way we can engage the bright and train him to think.


Ninth, in the grades we must, again, be strict, fair, and firm. We must, of course, work with as nearly homogeneous groups as possible. Enrichment must be provided for the bright, and remedial work for the slow. We must, in short, through our teaching and our parenthood guidance eradicate the philosophy that intellectual activity is sissy, silly stuff.


IF WE DO NOT DO THESE THINGS, WE SHALL SUFFER. The handwriting is on the wall.


24


SCHOOL COMMITTEE REPORT


CAN SCITUATE AFFORD GOOD SCHOOLS?


What are good schools? Fundamentally, good schools are those which educate the children to enter college and stay in college with facility and which educate the others to fill places as good citizens in the community. Good schools must have adequate housing so that the educative process can take place as it should. Good schools must have good teachers. Education can take place without expen- sive buildings but education cannot take place without competent teachers. Obviously, the best schools have the best teachers.


However, when a town grows from 4900 to 10,000 population in less than seven years, and when a school population moves from 1180 to 2600 in the same period, the buildings which housed the schools in 1951 will not do in 1958 and in the years to come.


Until in 1950 when Scituate opened its 22-room Central School, a high school accommodating approximately 400 in grades 7-12 and two six-room wooden schoolhouses were our entire school plant. Since 1951 when the Central School went into full operation, the Town and the need for housing have grown. Today despite the addition of two new 16-room elementary schools, and a $1,000,000 wing on the high school, we are faced with a building program which includes the immediate need for a 1000-pupil capacity junior high school, and, within two years, another 16-room elementary school, plus the possibility in 1963 or 1964 of another addition to the existing high school.


ARE OUR SCHOOLS COSTING TOO MUCH? The build- ing of necessary school housing at a cost well below the state average as our Building Committee has done with the Jenkins School, the Jenkins School Addition and the Wampatuck Schools, is not costing too much. Without adequate housing, education can- not take place. Cold rooms, lack of laboratories, lack of libraries, lack of play areas, pupils crowded 40 or more to a room are signs of inadequate education. At present, because the existing high school can no longer house grades 7 through 12, we are faced with "double sessions" until a junior high school is built to care for grades 7, 8, and 9, thus leaving grades 10, 11, 12 in the present building. Double sessions do not make for adequate education. Periods are shortened, pupils receive less instruction. However, double sessions are prefer- able to cramming from 40 to 45 in rooms and the necessity of drop- ping all classes in which there are less than 40.


ARE OUR TEACHERS COSTING TOO MUCH? This year we start our inexperienced teachers with bachelor's degrees at $3400 and $3600 for those with master's degrees. Teachers may go as


25


ENROLLMENT 1957-64 - SCITUATE PUBLIC SCHOOLS


Grade


1957-8


1958-9


1959-60


1960-1


1961-2


1962-3


1963-4


K


223


240


245


260


270


280


290


1


242


255


260


260


280


290


300


2


230


265


270


275


280


290


300


3


217


245


260


280


285


290


300


4


223


230


250


270


290


290


300


5


223


240


245


265


285


295


305


6


225


245


260


260


280


290


300


Sp


7


10


10


14


15


15


30


Total Enrollment


1590


1730


1800


1884


1985


2040


2125


Total Capacity


1680


1680


1680


1680


2190


2190


2190


7


155


220


240


265


260


280


290


8


169


175


235


250


270


265


285


9


132


160


185


225


240


280


275


Total Enrollment


456


555


660


740


770


325


850


Total Capacity


(650)


(650)


(650)


900


900


900


900


(Grades 7-12)


10


148


140


165


185


230


245


285


11


96


140


140


165


180


225


240


12


83


95


140


140


160


175


240


Total Enrollment


327


375


445


490


570


645


765


(Grades 7-12)


Total Capacity


(650)


1 (650)


(650)


650


650


650


850


SCHOOL COMMITTEE REPORT


26


ENROLLMENT 1957-1964 - SCITUATE PUBLIC SCHOOLS (continued)


Grade


1957-8


1958-9


1959-60


1960-1


1961-2


1962-3


1963-4


7-12 Total Enrollment


783


930


1105


1230


1340


1470


1615


7-12


Total Capacity


650


650


1550


1550


1550


1550


1750


K-12


Total Enrollment


2373


2660


2905


3114


3325


3510


3740


K-12 Total Capacity


2330


2330


2330


3230


3740


3740


3940


Our Building Program


JHS


El School


SHS Addition


SCHOOL COMMITTEE REPORT


27


SCHOOL COMMITTEE REPORT


high as: (no degree) $5200; (bachelor's degree) $5400; (master's degree) $5700; each after years of experience. Beginning next fall, we have increased these salary ranges: (no degree) no change; (bachelor's degree) $3700-$5700; and (master's degree) $3900-$6000.


WHY HAVE WE DONE THIS? Because we must do it to meet competition if we are to hire 12 additional teachers who will be the kind of teachers you and I as parents wish to have educate our children. In other words, if we do not pay higher salaries, teachers will go where they will - and most of our neighboring communities are paying comparable or better salaries.




Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.