USA > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Arlington > Town of Arlington annual report 1932 > Part 26
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27
Grading has demanded special attention during the year. Three projects have been carried on by the school department as relief work for unemployed people. At the high school the roadway from Schouler Court to the Warren A. Peirce Athletic Field has been laid out and surfaced with tar-bound macadam. Extensive work has been done on the rear driveways and in draining and smoothing up the grounds. Generous assistance has been freely given by the Public Works and Park Depart- ments of the town.
497
REPORT OF THE SCHOOL COMMITTEE
The grounds at the Junior High School West adjoining Quincy Street have been roughly graded; a heavy retain- ing wall and a needed path have been built. This section of the grounds should be finished with loam and seeded this coming spring.
The third job was grading and seeding the Brackett School playground, which, owing to restrictions of the bond issue for the new school, could not be included in the original appropriation. The work, including some equipment to be added in the spring, will be completed within the appropriation granted for the purpose.
III. The Curriculum
The school program in Arlington may properly be called conservative. It offers only such work and opportunities as have been offered for many years in rea- sonably progressive communities. Whatever may be the situation in other cities or towns, it cannot be said that our schools are indulging in useless activities-"fads and frills." The test of a good education is the extent to which it trains a given boy or girl according to his or her individual abilities and talents along lines that are valu-, able, not for conditions as they used to be, but as they are going to be. This can only be approximated, for even a liberally organized school program must necessarily limit itself to a few general fields. Experience and in- vestigation have shown that they should include the tra- ditional literary and utilitarian studies, commercial branches, music, art, manual and household arts, health activities, social and civic studies, and character educa- tion. These are all essential, both for individuals and for the general welfare of society. The mistake is often made of assuming that all students can profit from one general and limited type of education-book knowledge. As a matter of fact, one of the major wastes in educa-
·
498
ARLINGTON TOWN REPORT
tion is the instruction of non-intellectual students in classical or abstruse subjects. The obvious and just procedure is to provide, within reasonable limits, varied types of instruction and training.
The courses of study offered in Arlington are well ordered and well taught. Standards required for pro- motion and graduation are reasonably high. These things are no sudden achievement. They represent years of good planning and execution ..
It must not be assumed, though, that there is no need for change or improvement. The curriculum must constantly be developing to keep abreast of civilization and to anticipate the needs of youth in the next twenty years. The content, emphasis, and treatment of various subjects must, therefore, be changing, particularly in upper grades and high schools.
The health program in our schools is at the present time being thoroughly overhauled, to insure more per- fect co-ordination of all agencies and activities. The aim is to make the schools real health institutions that will contribute to personal and community well-being.
Our changing society demands better knowledge and mastery of the conditions and forces surrounding us. This must be attained by direct attack and experience. In consequence, the social studies and science must fill a larger part of the school program. These subjects have been given intensive study in the junior high schools during the last two years, resulting in desirable modifica- tions. They are moderately stressed in the senior high school. They must be made a more prominent part of public education.
Other phases of school work have been given special attention during the past year and will continue to be studied and directed by supervisors, principals, heads of departments and sub-committees.
499
REPORT OF THE SCHOOL COMMITTEE
IV. Finances
School organization, type and size of buildings, equip- ment, nature and extent of activities, standards main- tained, salary schedules, amount of books and supplies, all affect the cost of education. The conduct of schools is a big business enterprise, the nature and extent of which would be more easily realized if the product could but appear in material form that would have a cash sale value. But because it cannot be bought in the market like groceries, automobiles, houses, or bonds, the worth of education is not fully apparent. It has been conserva- tively estimated that the completion of a high school edu- cation is on an average worth $10,000 to an individual. On that basis, the 271 high school graduates of 1932, plus those who dropped out before completing the course represent a year's product of well over $3,000,000 in return for expenditures of one-fourth of that sum.
Taking the value of education for granted, a study of financing an approved plan must necessarily deal largely with the amount, division, and trend of expendi- tures. What is the situation in Arlington ?
Some references have been made to expenses in preceding parts of this report. The statistics given under "Organization" are illuminating and indicate as there shown that good business management has characterized the school department for years. Expenses have greatly increased, but by no means out of proportion to growth in population, wealth, general standards, and public demands.
Economies already put into operation since 1930, in- cluding the seven measures already listed under "Accommodations," reduction in number of employees, savings in purchase of supplies, and in sundry other ways, have been effective in reducing school costs, and
500
ARLINGTON TOWN REPORT
will continue to exert a marked influence. The cost per pupil member, for example, was $117.14 in 1929-30, and will be approximately $105 for the current school year assuming a reduction of ten per cent in the payroll from January first.
It will be in place to recall the constructive report submitted at the last town meeting (March 1932) by the "Committee to investigate the school system of Arlington with particular reference to cost of operation."
This committee reported its belief "that reductions can be made in the cost of operating the school system without impairing the efficiency of the school department or decreasing the scope of the curriculum" and made a number of specific suggestions for such reductions. The methods referred to in this report have received careful consideration by the school department. It has been found possible to make substantial savings in a number of directions. (See later summary.)
The special committee's report is based largely upon the per pupil cost for various items in Arlington con- trasted with corresponding figures in twelve other nearby towns and cities, as given in the 1931 report of the State Department of Education.
While such "per pupil cost" is significant, it mani- festly is an inaccurate measure of economy and value, for it does not interpret varying local conditions, the scope of educational offerings, the organization of schools, standards in force, proportion of high school students, population, wealth, or other factors affecting school expenditures.
In the group of thirteen towns and cities listed in this committee report, Arlington is exceeded in per pupil
501
REPORT OF THE SCHOOL COMMITTEE
cost by two other communities, Brookline and Newton. (Its position was the same in 1932.) Our per pupil cost was given as $112.44, compared with an average for the group of $103.29. Should, then, our school expenditures be reduced to the average of $103.29? If so, should the town spending the smallest rate, $84.83, raise its expendi- tures to $103.29 ? A different group of towns and cities could easily be chosen where the average cost per pupil would be much higher than in Arlington. Should, then, our expenditures be increased? Or again a group of thirteen places could be found whose expenditures would average less than $75.00 per pupil. A reduction to that figure would, of course, be disastrous. The lowest cost per pupil reported by the State Department for 1931 was $62.04. The highest was $415.00. In the entire State one hundred thirty places had a higher per pupil cost than Arlington, and two hundred twenty-four had a lower cost. In 1932, there were one hundred twenty-six higher and two hundred twenty-eight lower, with a range from $54.37 to $439.33 per pupil.
These figures furnish no accurate basis for deciding what the cost of education should be in any town or city. They rather indicate that it must be a problem for local determination because factors entering into the question vary so greatly.
In considering the matter locally, however, school costs may advantageously be divided and expressed on a per pupil basis, for trends and adjustments can be readily portrayed.
For this purpose, the following statement is pre- sented, giving the per pupil cost for 1930-31 as presented in the report of the investigating committee, based on an average membership of 6,126, and for the calendar year 1932 based on an average membership of 6,302.
502
ARLINGTON TOWN REPORT
Items
Cost per pupil school year 1930-31
Cost per pupil fiscal year 1932
Expenditures 1932
General Control
$3.86
$2.99
$18,858.79
Salaries of Principals,
Teachers, Supervisors
79.65
79.64
501,890.65
Text Books
2.32
1.20
7,584.82
Janitors and fuel
12.19
11.30
71,238.77
Repairs
4.65
4.53
28,538.27
Libraries (gross cost)
.48*
.46 **
2,871.05
Libraries (net cost)
.33
.32
2,000.00
Health
1.59
1.44
9,089.55
Miscellaneous
7.70
7.28
45,876.20
Total cost per pupil of above items
$112.44
$108.84
$685,948.10
* $.15 per pupil was paid out of Pratt, Cutter and Russell funds, leaving net cost to town $.33 per pupil.
** $.14 per pupil was paid out of Pratt, Cutter and Russell funds, leav- ing net cost to town $.32 per pupil.
This statement shows that the local cost of education expressed on a per pupil basis has appreciably decreased. It should be lower still for the calendar year 1933, even without salary reductions. If, as is proposed, a ten per cent. contribution is levied on school employees, the per pupil cost will be further reduced by about $7.00 in the second item, and about $8.00 altogether.
It will be worth while to summarize here the finan- cial adjustments made by the school department in the interest of economy during the last two years.
A. General Control
1. Office of business agent discontinued.
2. Clerk for purchasing agent released.
3. Reduction of nearly one-third in administrative expenses, other than salaries, since 1931.
B. Instruction
4. Two supervisors, seven sub-primary classes and six other teaching positions discontinued.
503
REPORT OF THE SCHOOL COMMITTEE
5. Grade classification and consolidation of classes, with estimated saving of eight or ten elementary school teachers (noted above), and postponement of new school building.
6. Increasing size of high school classes from aver- age of 19.2 to 23 students per regular teacher.
7. Reduction in purchase of textbooks and supplies from $41,976.60, expenses in 1931, to budget of $30,125 for 1933.
C. Operation and Maintenance
8. Position of chief janitor abolished, and supervisor of maintenance appointed to take over his duties and supervisory work of business agent.
9. Economy secured in use of fuel, light and power, janitors' supplies, and on repair jobs.
D. Miscellaneous
10. Discontinuance of summer school.
11. Age of admission to grade I raised from five years by October first to five years, six months.
12. Change in boundary lines between Junior High School West and Junior High School Center to utilize spare room in latter school.
13. Careful consideration of all expenditures, choice of materials, securing competitive bids, etc.
14. Avoidance of policies and projects that would un- necessarily inflate expenditures.
Some Prospective Financial Needs
This report would be incomplete if it did not mention those outstanding needs and problems affecting educa- tional expenditures which should be met in the near future.
504
ARLINGTON TOWN REPORT
Economies have been effected, as already explained, in reorganization of classes. School accommodations, however, are rather fully utilized at present, leeway in some rooms being offset by crowded conditions in others. Arlington is steadily growing and with the return of better times, school membership will grow more rapidly. This will overcrowd some of the elementary school build- ings, perhaps also the junior high schools. It is quite likely that not later than 1934, the Pheasant Avenue school building should be erected. This building should be so planned as to permit the later addition of a junior high school unit which will, in all probability, be needed in a few years to care for pupils in the northern and Morningside sections of the town.
It seems also highly probable that more accommoda- tions will soon be needed in the eastern part of the town, perhaps by adding to the Hardy School. This building is now fully occupied and two other classes are housed in the adjacent portable building.
The senior high school has ample capacity for a much larger enrolment than the present number, but the new building is incomplete and should be finished. The outstanding need is completion of the auditorium. The walls are unfinished, the ceiling is not installed; con- sequently, the hall cannot be satisfactorily heated. Bal- conies which are essential in order to seat even the present high school students ought to be built in. This work should be done, if possible, this year.
The proposed gymnasium and administration unit, with accompanying corridors, connecting the old and new buildings are much needed. This project may be post- poned for the present, but should be undertaken before many years in order to obviate certain handicaps and difficulties that will increase with the growth of the school.
505
REPORT OF THE SCHOOL COMMITTEE
In general current expenses we may expect a normal increase corresponding to growth in enrolment. This will involve additional teachers, extra books and general supplies. It is also certain that expenditures for text- books will soon be much greater due to the severe curtail- ment in this item in 1932 and 1933.
Summary
This report has dealt chiefly with expansion of school plant, reorganization of classes, and retrenchment of current expenses. A few changes, we think for the better, have been made in the program of school activities.
There has been a splendid spirit of cooperation and enthusiasm throughout the system, shared by pupils as well as employees. In consequence, we believe the schools have been improving, and will continue to do so, in spite of the prospect of heavier requirements with lessened resources. In these difficult times, it is a pleasure to acknowledge the interest and help of all who are con- cerned with the conduct and support of our schools.
Respectfully submitted,
(Signed) CLARENCE H. DEMPSEY,
Superintendent of Schools.
January, 1933.
506
ARLINGTON TOWN REPORT
LIST OF HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES
*HONOR PUPILS
Alexie, Sonja L. Anderson, Marion E.
Anderson, Mildred Elfrida
Anderson, Mildred Elizabeth Anderson, Natalie
Anderson, Ralph David Annal, Barbara Brown Austin, Harry Osborn
*Bailey, Margaret Burton Balser, William Edwin Bassett, Elsie
Beecy, Joseph Franklin Benson, Janet Ruth
Bezanson, Forrest LeRoy Biathrow, Lindsay Spencer Biederbeck, Russell Leonard Black, John Thomas *Bond, Verna Ruth
*Bornstein, Lillian Miriam Brackett, June Clark
*Bradbury, Lucille Brady, Mary Agnes Braithwaite, Marjorie Lucille Brine, George Stewart
*Brown, Helen G. Brown, Mary Alma Brown, Ruth Elizabeth Buchanan, Barbara Doris Buckley, Daniel Joseph
*Burgess, Virginia Burns, Frances Helen Burr, Jacqueline W. Byer, Adele R. Byrne, Eleanor Margaret
Callahan, Catherine Coakley Callahan, Daniel D. Cameron, Olive Ruth Campbell, Eleanor May Cannell, Howard Everett Carle, Ransom Bradley Carlton, Ruth Elizabeth *Carroll, Hugh Francis *Carter, Frances Marie Cartullo, Helen Margaret Casey, Ann Dorothy
*Chipman, Martha W. Clark, Grace Harriett
Cody, Elizabeth Oonagh Coghlan, Dorothea A.
Colby, George Raymond, Jr. Colitas, Marjorie Cleo
*Collins, John Edmund Condon, Mary Eunice C. Connolly, Mary Elizabeth Connolly, Rose A.
*Corcoran, Eleanor Joan
*Corleto, Sylvia A. Cowdrey, Robert Samuel Coyne, Helena Frances Cran, Virginia Preston Critcherson, Hattie Denney Crocker, Mildred Josephine Crosby, Augusta Adelaide Curtis, Winslow Sheridan Dacey, Catherine Elizabeth
Dale, Isabel Agnes Davieau, Cyril Francis
*Davis, Chrystalle Bernice
*Davis, Elizabeth Davis, Helen Marie Davis, Leonora Dickson, Helen Gertrude
Doane, Helen A.
Doherty, Marjorie Mary
Donahue, John Francis
Donovan, James Joseph Douthart, Marguerite Eleanor
*Duffy, Martha E.
*Easton, John Adlington, Jr. Easton, John Franklin Edwards, Robert Graham Fahnley, William H. Fitz-Gerald, Johnstone Flagg, Nina Evelyn Fleming, G. Robert
*Foran, Anne Janet Forest, Lillian Mary Foss, Elsie Mae Fowler, Warren Bradford
*Frankel, Ruth Fredette, Bernadette Marie Ganong, Warren Lincoln Gels, Julia E. Giaquinto, Philip E.
1
507
REPORT OF THE SCHOOL COMMITTEE
*HONOR PUPILS
Gilbert, Howard Harry Giles, Charles Stanton Giles, Weston Warner Golden, Peter A. Good, Mary Ellen Gookin, Dorothy
*Gott, Clarice Athalia Grady, Robert F. Gray, Marjorie Lois Gricus, Robert Anthony John Gustafson, Carl Ernest Hall, Alice Marjorie Hammond, Eleanor E. Harding, Theodore P. Hart, Edward Francis Hartwell, Doris Arlene Hauser, Elise Gertrude Hendrick, Arthur Joseph, Jr. Hicks, Emma Lillian Hicks, S. Trafford, Jr. Hilbert, Harry Collins Hosmer, Hammond Chase Howse, Pauline Ruth Hunt, R. Willard
*Hurley, Anna Barbara *Jeffers, Robert M. Johnson, Edwin Richard Jouve, Henry Louis, Jr. Karlson, Ruth Astrid Keefe, Joseph D.
*Keefe, Rita Ellen Kennedy, Anne Ridgeley Kenovitch, Ida Irene Killilea, Mary C. King, Ethel Gertrude King, Helen Ruth Kingman, Edith LaFond, Edmond, Jr. Larch, Mary Lauretta Larson, Hilda Evelyn Leary, David Francis LeBlanc, Joseph William Leveroni, Mary Evelyn Liszewska, Dorothy Stella Livingstone, Muriel Beatrice *Llewellyn, Barbara *Lord, Thomas Henry *Loupos, Georgia P. *Loupos, Helen P. *Low, Elizabeth Lowcock, Ella Marion Lowcock, Marjorie
Mackenzie, Jessie Bell Macleod, Roderick Munro
Magnuson, Martha Lillian
Malatesta, Evelyn Theresa Malcolm, James O.
Malkofsky, Israel Maloon, John Austin, Jr. Marecki, Phyllis C.
*Marsh, Jean Elizabeth McCarthy, Rita McCormac, Paul J.
*McGivern, Mary Louise McKenna, John F. McLean, Helen Louise
*McManus, Eleanor S. McNamee, Mary E. Mead, Mariea M. Mee, Thomas Francis Merrill, Edward H.
Merrill, Herbert T.
Monroe, James Joseph Moody, Richard P. Mooney, Francis Joseph Moran, Thomas Francis
Moulton, Irene Frances
Murphy, Irene Gertrude Murphy, Mary Monica
O'Brien, Mary Rita
O'Connor, Elizabeth Ann O'Connor, Betty Laura O'Connor, Helen Claire
O'Donnell, James Thomas Ogilvie, Weston A. Ogren, Andrew R. Ohlund, J. Frederick
*O'Leary, Helen J. *O'Neil, Dorcas E. O'Neill, Lawrence Kenneth O'Rourke, Leona Theresa O'Sullivan, Veronica Mary Palmer, Isabelle Lloyd
*Papouleas, Virgina Parker, Lillian R. Parks, Dorothy Beatrice
*Patterson, Francis Irving Peirce, Marjorie Alice Peirce, Natalie Estelle Phillips, Florence Lucile Purdy, Murray Livingston Ramsey, Leah B. Ramsey, William Starr, Jr. Rawlings, Barbara Lucille
508
ARLINGTON TOWN REPORT
*HONOR PUPILS
Reilly, William A.
Revell, Paul H.
Rice, Lillian Alavisa
Rice, Marshall J.
Richmond, Paul
Rileigh, Walter A.
Riley, Ambrose, Jr.
Roberto, Marie Helen
Robinson, Edna Louise
Robinson, Margaret Lowe
*Rooney, M. Dorothy
*Staub, Geraldine E. Stewart, Marian Elizabeth Stiff, Donald Sampson Stribley, Ronald K. R. Sullivan, Jeannette Mary Sullivan, John Edward Sward, Esther Charlotte
* Rowland, Ruth Ann *Roy, Gertrude L. Russell, Warren Edward Ryan, Edward Thomas, II Ryan, Mary Dorothy Sandquist, Louise H.
*Tate, Virginia Tayian, Florence Tierney, Joseph Anthony. Tobin, Kathryn Adrienne
*Santoliquido, R. Mary Scannell, Margaret Elizabeth Schmidt, Werner
Turner, Mary Pamelia Twambly, Dorothy Frances
*Sedoff, Arthur Seeley, Beryl Marie Seretto, Menina C.
*Tymchuk, Stapha Theresa Wallace, Ruth Elizabeth
Walther, Marion Eleanor
Waterfall, Dorothy E. Watson, Beatrice K.
*Sevoian, Anna Agnes Shallow, Virginia Marie Shannon, Mary Elizabeth Shaw, Elizabeth Shean, David W., Jr.
Weiner, Hilda Wenzlow, William West, Eleanor
Shedd, Miriam Symonds
White, Arthur
Silva, Emma Marie Silva, Joseph F., Jr.
White, Olive Gunn Whitehouse, Howard Newton.
Williamson, Ernest Payne
Wilson, Richard
*Slattery, Rose Aloyse Slocomb, Mary Ellen Smith, Geraldine Patricia Smith, Gordon M.
Winchenbaugh, Mary Elizabeth
Young, Barbara
Zeigler, Elmer Herbert
Simpson, Robert George Skillings, Edna Sybil
Smith, Robert Edward Smith, Russell Vincent Snow, Pauline Sorrento, Violet Ann Spizer, Mabel S.
Toye, Mary Ellen
Tully, Doris Mae
509
REPORT OF THE SCHOOL COMMITTEE
PART II
Statistics
The following tables and information are given as mat- ters of interest and value for permanent record.
I General Statistics, School Year 1931-1932
Population, U. S. Census 1930 36,094
Valuation of property, April 1, 1932. $62,910,250 Valuation of school property, April 1, 1932 .... $2,454,600
Number of principals, January 1, 1932. ..
12
Number of supervisors, January 1, 1932.
6
Number of teachers, January 1, 1932.
261
Number of part time teachers, January 1, · 1932 5
School census, children 5 to 16 years, Oc- tober, 1931 6,800
Pupils enrolled during the year 6,447
Average daily attendance 5,919
Average number of days school kept. 179
Average membership . 6,244
Percentage of attendance. 94.8
Total cost for support, school year 1931-1932 $713,774.48
Average cost per pupil in average member- ship $114.31
Part of this raised from local taxation.
$642,820.36
Number of senior high school graduates, 1932 271
Number of junior high school graduates, 1932 410
510
ARLINGTON TOWN REPORT
ATTENDANCE STATISTICS BY SCHOOLS FOR YEAR 1931-1932
SCHOOLS AND TEACHERS
GRADES
Enrolled
for year
Average
Membership
Average
Attendance
Per Cent of Attendance
HIGH SCHOOL.
XIII (Post graduates)
31
24.4
22.2
91.
XII
246
238.5
229.2
96.1
XI
382
361.6
342.5
94.7
X
552
526.2
499.0
94.8
Industrial Arts
18
16.3
14.3
87.7
1,229
1167.0
1107.2
90.4
JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, CENTER.
IX
82
83.
79.4
95.7
VIII
95
93.
89.3
96.
VII
100
95.1
90.8
95.5
Continuation
7
9.9
9.5
95.9
284
281.0
269.0
95.7
JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, EAST
IX
164
161.
155.5
96.6
VIII
183
179.6
173.1
96.4
VII
161
152.3
147.1
96.6
508
492.9
475.7
96.5
JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, WEST
IX
221
212.8
204.4
96.1
VIII
244
236.4
226.6
95.9
VII
224
221.9
213.5
96.2
689
671.1
644.5
96.0
OLD PARMENTER
Industrial Arts
79
74.9
69.1
92.3
BRACKETT SCHOOL
Helen M. Warren
V
22
23.2
22.3
95.9
Idolize E. Roderick
V
29
29.5
28.5
96.6
Priscilla R. Hemphill.
IV
41
36.2
34.7
95.8
Dorothy Sodnowsky
III
IV
30.6
28.6
93.4
Isabell W. Eaton
III
52
40.6
38.6
95.1
Mary L. Forster
II
23
23.1
21.
90.9
Muriel A. Johnson
II
26
28.4
27.3
96.2
Matilda Weddleton
I
33
29.
26.5
91.3
Cecilia C. Morytko
I
-
22.
19.6
89.1
226
262.6
247.1
94.0
..
..
Daily
511
REPORT OF THE SCHOOL COMMITTEE
ATTENDANCE STATISTICS BY SCHOOLS FOR YEAR 1931-1932
SCHOOLS AND TEACHERS
GRADES
Enrolled
for year
Average
Membership
Average
Attendance
Per Cent of Attendance
CROSBY SCHOOL :
Helen I. Knowles
VI
29
29.2
28.0
95.9
Mary A. Ahern
VI
32
31.3
30.1
96.3
Bessie Ryder
VI
32
31.5
30.8
97.8
Rilla M. Hamlin
V
17
22.7
22.1
97.5 95.8
Mary E. Polk
V
37
34.3
32.6
94.8
Hulda Magnuson
IV
20
20.4
19.2
94.1
Wyllian Barrett
IV
30
30.3
29.1
96.3
Winifred Trask
IV
25
22.8
21.9
96.3
Lula Rankin
III
26
24.
22.8
95.
Irene Bucek
III
31
28.2
.
20.
95.7
Marion B. Johnson
[I
28
25.3
23.6
93.3
Mildred J. Austin
II
26
25.6
24.
93.9
Annie W. Cobb
1
[
37
34.3
30.8
89.8
Caroline W. Pratt
I
33
32.2
29.5
91.5
Elizabeth A. Roach
Special Class ..
12
10.2
9.6
94.3
536
518.5
490.5
96.2
CUTTER SCHOOL :
Alice G. W. Daniels
VI
34
35.2
34.1
96.9
Francese S. Curtis ...
VI
35
34.3
33.1
96.4
Mae F. Merrill
VI
34
35.4
34.1
96.4
Louise Barber
V
40
38.5
36.7
95.
Elsie F. Greenwood
V
38
37.3
35.6
95.4
Bessie M. Mack
IV
30
30.2
28.8
95.6
Susie M. Baggs
TV
31
29.3
27.8
95.
Catherine M. Smith
29
26.5
25.4
95.9
Margaret E. Miller
[II
34
31.9
30.4
95.4
Laura B. Hutchins
TII
32
32.5
31.2
96.0
Gladys Patterson
III
31
30.4
28.7
94.5
Arline Avery
TI
27
26.3
25.0
94.8
Pauline Berry
I
33
31.6
29.8
94.
M. Frances York
II
30
28.9
27.
93.7
Ida C. Hunt
29
28.
25.5
91.
Mary G. Lane
T
32
30.8
28.1
91.2
Alta Lezotte
I
30
26.3
24.6
93.4
Dorothy Fifield
I
25
23.1
20.8
90.3
574
556.5
526.7
94.6
[I
31
29.5
27.7
93.9
35
31.
29.
94.
Sara M. Henderson
III
19
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.