USA > Tennessee > Bedford County > History of Tennessee, from the earliest time to the present; together with an historical and a biographical sketch of Maury, Williamson, Rutherford, Wilson, Bedford and Marshall counties, besides a valuable fund of notes, reminiscences, observations, etc., etc, Vol.2 > Part 3
USA > Tennessee > Marshall County > History of Tennessee, from the earliest time to the present; together with an historical and a biographical sketch of Maury, Williamson, Rutherford, Wilson, Bedford and Marshall counties, besides a valuable fund of notes, reminiscences, observations, etc., etc, Vol.2 > Part 3
USA > Tennessee > Wilson County > History of Tennessee, from the earliest time to the present; together with an historical and a biographical sketch of Maury, Williamson, Rutherford, Wilson, Bedford and Marshall counties, besides a valuable fund of notes, reminiscences, observations, etc., etc, Vol.2 > Part 3
USA > Tennessee > Maury County > History of Tennessee, from the earliest time to the present; together with an historical and a biographical sketch of Maury, Williamson, Rutherford, Wilson, Bedford and Marshall counties, besides a valuable fund of notes, reminiscences, observations, etc., etc, Vol.2 > Part 3
USA > Tennessee > Williamson County > History of Tennessee, from the earliest time to the present; together with an historical and a biographical sketch of Maury, Williamson, Rutherford, Wilson, Bedford and Marshall counties, besides a valuable fund of notes, reminiscences, observations, etc., etc, Vol.2 > Part 3
USA > Tennessee > Rutherford County > History of Tennessee, from the earliest time to the present; together with an historical and a biographical sketch of Maury, Williamson, Rutherford, Wilson, Bedford and Marshall counties, besides a valuable fund of notes, reminiscences, observations, etc., etc, Vol.2 > Part 3
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45 | Part 46 | Part 47 | Part 48 | Part 49 | Part 50 | Part 51 | Part 52 | Part 53 | Part 54 | Part 55 | Part 56 | Part 57 | Part 58 | Part 59 | Part 60 | Part 61 | Part 62 | Part 63 | Part 64 | Part 65 | Part 66 | Part 67 | Part 68 | Part 69 | Part 70 | Part 71 | Part 72 | Part 73 | Part 74 | Part 75 | Part 76 | Part 77 | Part 78 | Part 79 | Part 80 | Part 81 | Part 82 | Part 83 | Part 84 | Part 85 | Part 86 | Part 87 | Part 88 | Part 89 | Part 90 | Part 91 | Part 92 | Part 93 | Part 94 | Part 95 | Part 96 | Part 97 | Part 98 | Part 99 | Part 100
635
HISTORY OF TENNESSEE.
Medical and Physical Sciences, Southern Homestead, whose literary de- partment was edited by Mrs. L. Virginia French, and The Baptist Stand- ard came out between 1858 and 1860. The Temperance Monthly, edited by Mrs. Emelie C. S. Chilton, a poet of high order, and The Daily Eren- ing Bulletin were papers of 1859. The Opposition was a campaign paper in the struggle for governor between Col. John Netherland and. Gov. Isham G. Harris. The National Pathfinder was edited by T. F. Hughes, Esq., in 1860. The Nashville Christian Advocate began in 1834. It was edited successively by many prominent divines. The Louisville (Ky.) Christian Advocate was merged in this paper in 1851. In 1858 Rev. Dr. McFerrin, who had been editor, resigned, and was suc- ceeded by Rev. H. N. McTyeire. Dr. McFerrin was appointed agent of the Methodist Episcopal Publishing House at that time. The Nashville True Whig began in 1845, and was succeeded in 1856 by The Nashville Patriot.
The Nashville Gazette, the second paper of that name, was published in 1819 by Mr. George Wilson, the same who had conducted Wilson's Knoxville Gazette in 1804. The Nashville Whig, established by Moses and Joseph Norvell, began in 1812 and continued to 1816. The Nash- ville Banner, a weekly, existed between 1822 and 1826. It was then united with The Whig, under the name of Nashville Banner and Whig, a semi-weekly. It was not until 1831 that Nashville had a daily paper. This was The National Banner and Nashville Advertiser. This contin- ued until 1834, when it was found that daily papers did not pay in Nash- - ville, and it became a tri-weekly. The Nashville Republican grew out of the materials of the old Clarion and Tennessee Gazette in 1824. After some changes it became a daily issue in 1837.
The Republican Banner was begun in 1837, enlarged in 1839, and in 1842 Gen. F. K. Zollicoffer, who had learned the printer's trade in Mr. F. S. Heiskell's office at Knoxville, assumed the editorship. Gen. Zolli- coffer earned a reputation as an able political writer, and kept up The Banner to the highest standard of newspaper excellence. The Banner had many editors who were men of distinguished merit and position. The Nashville Gazette, third paper of that name, was in existence from 1844 to 1862. About this time The Republican Banner was established, and continued to 1853, when it was united with The American under the title of Nashville Union and American. In 1848 was established The Daily Centre-State American and Nashville Weekly American. The Nashville Union and American began in 1853, and grew out of the con- solidation of The Union and The American. The Union had been ed- ited by Col. J. G. Harris, who was an editorial pupil of George D. Pren-
636
HISTORY OF TENNESSEE.
tice. Col. Harris had earned distinction as a political writer, and was an adherent of Gen. Andrew Jackson. Mr. John Miller McKee was com- mercial and city editor of The Union and American in 1858, and in 1860 Mr. John C. Burch became associate editor. Mr. Leon Trousdale was also one of the editors of this paper. The Nashville Union and American was suspended on the evacuation of Nashville by the Confederates in 1862.
Nashville, at the outbreak of the Rebellion, was considered the pub- lishing center of the South, having more periodicals than any other city of her size. She had no less than nineteen journals and nine large pub- lishing houses. At the fall of Fort Donelson, in 1862, the general panic induced every man to seek his own safety. Printing offices were abandoned by members of the press, their public position rendering them peculiarly obnoxioussto the enemy. Many printers were without employment, and in the absence of better occupation engaged in what proved a lucrative business, that of selling newspapers. There were several war publications. The first made its appearance in February, 1862, under the name of The Nashville Times. This suspended after the issue of the thirteenth number. Six numbers of the Evening Bulle- tin followed. The Nashville Daily Union began in 1862 and had a short existence. Other papers were The Nashville Dispatch, April, 1862. The Constitution, with George Baber as editor, appeared in July, 1862, and The Nashville Daily Press began in May, 1863. It con- tinued, with frequent change of editors, to May, 1865, when it was united with the Times and Union. Mr. S. C. Mercer edited in 1864 The Nash- ville Times and True Union. It was afterward merged with the Press, and bore the title of Nashville Daily Press and Times. A paper named The Nashville Daily Journal existed for a short time in 1863. Mr. L. C. Houk was editor.
After the war the publication of The Union and American, as a daily, tri-weekly and weekly, continued to the latter part of 1866, when it be- came, by consolidation with The Dispatch, The Union and Dispatch. In 1868 the paper was combined with The Daily Gazette, and resumed the name of Union and American. In 1875 The Union and American was consolidated with The Republican Banner, and became The American, a daily, semi-weekly and weekly issue. The Tennessee Staats-Zeitung is a German paper, and is said to be the only daily paper of that kind outside of New Orleans. Mr. John Ruhm edited the paper in 1866, when it was first issued. He has since become a prominent lawyer in Nashville. The Methodist Episcopal Publishing House has quite a number of journalistie publications, and does a large book business.
637
FROM PHOTO BY THUS, KOELLEIN & GIERS. NASHVILLE
ANDREW JOHNSON
637
HISTORY OF TENNESSEE.
The colored people of Nashville are represented by some creditable news- papers, showing much enlightenment and progress on their part. Be- sides journalistic and periodical influence, Nashville is prominent for almanacs. This useful form of literature was begun in 1807, when Bradford's Tennessee Almanac appeared. The Cumberland Almanac for 1827 followed, and has had a regular publication since.
1
The first published Memphis paper was The Memphis Advocate and Western Distric intelligencer, the first issue appearing January 18. 1827. It was a weekly publication by Parron & Phoebus. The Times was established soon after, and later the two were consolidated and en- titled The Times and Advocate. P. G. Gaines and Mr. Murray found- ed The Memphis Gazette in 1831, and it continued until 1837 or 1838. F. S. Lathan, publisher of The Randolph Recorder, established in 1836 a weekly paper known as The Memphis Enquirer, with Mr. J. H. McMahon, editor. The paper continued with many changes of owners and editors until 1850, when it united with The Eagle, and was published as The Eagle and Enquirer for ten years. The Eagle was established by T. S. La- tham in January, 1842. Dr. Solon Borland began the publication of The Western World and Memphis Banner of the Constitution, a weekly, in 1839. The first number of The Memphis Appeal, edited by Henry Van Pelt, appeared April 21, 1841. It has changed proprietors several times since his death, and is still published as a daily and weekly. Memphis Monitor, which was founded by John C. Morrill in 1846, was merged into The Appeal soon after. Several other newspapers of a transitory na- ture were in existence between 1846 and 1860. Among these were The Whig Commercial and Evening Herald. The Memphis Bulletin, estab- lished in 1855, was published until 1867, when it was merged into The At- alanche. The latter was founded by M. C. Gallaway in 1858, and with the exception of three years during the war. has since been published both as a daily and as a weekly. There were several papers published in the war, among which were The Public Ledger, Argus and Commercial. The last two were united in 1866 or 1867. In addition to newspapers a num- ber of periodicals have been published. The following is a list of the publications in 1884: Dailies-Appeal, Avalanche, Public Ledger and Scimeter. Each also publishes weekly editions. Weeklies and monthlies- Living Way, Mississippi Valley Medical Monthly, Review, Southern Post Journal (German), Tennessee Baptist and Watchman, a colored Baptist paper.
1
40
638
HISTORY OF TENNESSEE.
CHAPTER XVIII.
RELIGIOUS HISTORY-THE RELATION BETWEEN RELIGION AND THE CONSTITUTION. AND THE LAWS-THE GRADUAL DEVELOPMENT OF ECCLESIASTICAL TOLERA- TION-THE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE -- THE EARLIEST MINISTRA- TIONS IN TENNESSEE- -- THE METHODS OF THE CIRCUIT RIDERS, AND THE PHENOMENAL RESULTS -- AN ANALYSIS OF THE CAUSES OF THE "JERKS" AND THE "POWER"-A SUMMARY OF THE CREEDS OF THE PRINCIPAL SECTARIAN ORGAN- IZATIONS-AN ACCOUNT OF THE ORIGIN, GROWTH AND SUCCESS OF THE VARI- OUS CHURCHES-FAMOUS REVIVALS AND ILLUSTRATIVE ANECDOTES-THE IMPORTANCE OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CAMP MEETINGS-THE CONTROVER- SIES OF THE CHURCHES UPON THE QUESTION OF SLAVERY -- THE INTEREST TAKEN IN SUNDAY-SCHOOL WORK-THE RELIGIOUS STATUS OF THE COLORED RACE-BUILDINGS, FINANCES, PUBLICATIONS, CONVENTIONS, ETC.
"THE progress a people has made, so far as intelligence and tolerance of opinion are concerned, is with tolerable accuracy ascertainable by a careful study of their constitution and laws. When the people of a State adopt an original or an amended constitution, that constitution may be taken as an expression of their sentiments, opinions or convic- tions as to what is essential to the welfare of the community. The same remark is applicable to the laws passed by that body endowed with the power of enactment. It is true that a constitution may be adopted by a mere majority of the voters; the minority may be more or less earnestly opposed to it; the minority may be in fact more intelligent than the ma- jority, may gradually come to be the majority and may then amend the constitution under which they have lived in such manner that it shall con- form to their sentiments, opinions and convictions. This new constitu- tion in the particulars in which it has been amended indicates the change in the opinions of the people; it may be progression, it may be retrogres- sion, but the old and amended constitutions when compared serve to mark the degrees on the scale of progress. Individuals may be, and sometimes are, centuries in advance of their contemporaries. Lord Bacon who died in 1626, said: "Divisions in religion are less dangerous than violent measures of prevention. The wound is not dangerous unless poisoned with remedies. Inquiry is not to be feared. Controversy is the wind by which the truth is winnowed."
Where the mind is free religion never has dangerous enemies. Atheism is the mistake of the metaphysician, not of human nature. In- fidelity gains the victory when it wrestles with hypocrisy or superstition, not when its antagonist is reason. When an eclesiastical establishment
639
HISTORY OF TENNESSEE.
requires universal conformity some consciences must necessarily bo wronged and oppressed. In such cases, if the wrong be successful, the servitude is followed by consequences analogous to those which ensue on the civil enslavement of the people. The mind is burdened by a sense of injury; the judgment is confused, and in its zeal to throw of an intol- lerable tyranny, passion attempts to sweep away every form of religion. Bigotry commits the correlative error when it attempts to control opion- ion by positive statutes; to substitute the terrors of law for convincing argument. It is a gigantic crime from the commission of which in the past the world is still suffering, to enslave the human mind under the earnest desire or under the specious pretext of protecting religion. Re- ligion of itself, pure and undefiled, never had an enemy. It has enemies only when coupled with bigotry, superstition and intolerance, and then only because it is so enveloped in these as to be indistinguishable from them. While their power and their tryanny have for centuries been em- ployed to strengthen and defend religion, they have ever been, and are to-day, though in a far less degree than formerly, the worst enemy that religion has. The history of the world conclusively proves that positive enactments against irreligion, or prohibiting the denial of the truths of religion as they are conceived to be, provoke and cause the very evil they were designed to prevent. For to deny the truths of the proposi- tions or dogmas of any form of religion is a right inherent in every man, for the exercise of which he is responsible to none but to himself and his Creator. Besides there are always those who have a desire for martyr- dom, being unable in any other way to achieve distinction, and because to be a martyr evinces courage and excites sympathy, and there are always more people capable of extending sympathy to the persecuted and oppressed than there are of those capable of rendering an accurate judg- ment upon the question for which the martyr chooses to be impaled.
While such principles as these seem now to be generally admitted, yet at the time of the formation of the constitutions of most of the origi- nal thirteen States, the most intelligent of the people, law-makers, min- isters and others, notwithstanding the fact that the Pilgrims abandoned England and sought the unknown and inhospitable shores of America for the sole purpose of finding an asylum in which they could themselves exercise and enjoy the sweets of religious freedom, and notwithstanding the fact that the Catholic colony of Maryland under Lord Baltimore, had found it expedient to extend to Protestants the religious liberty which they claimed for themselves, entertained and succeeded in having en- grafted into most of those constitutions provisions embodying and enforc- ing sentiments similar to those expressed by the rugged and uncom-
-
640
HISTORY OF TENNESSEE.
promising Dudley, who was not softened even by old age, and many others of the leading religious thinkers of colonial times. Said Dudley: "God forbid our love of truth should thus grow cold-that we should tol- erate error. I die no libertine."
"Let men of God, in courts and churches watch, All such as toleration hatch,
Lest that ill egg bring forth a cockatrice, To poison all with heresy and vice; If men be left and otherwise combine, My epitaph's "I died no libertine."
Cotton affirmed that it is "better to tolerate hypocrites and tares, than thorns and briers;" thus recognizing the great principle that hypocrisy is one of the grave evils of intolerance. Ward's opinion was that "poly- piety is the greatest impiety in the world. To say that man ought to have liberty of conscience is impious ignorance." Norton said: "Relig- ion admits of no eccentric motions."
In consonance with these sentiments and the spirit which they indi- cate, Massachusetts adopted a constitution under which a particular form of worship was made a part of the civil establishment, and irreligion was punished as a civil offense. Treason against the civil government was treason against Christ, and reciprocally blasphemy was the highest offense in the catalogue of crimes. To deny that any book of the Old or New Testament was the infallible word of God was punishable by fine or by whipping, and in case of obstinacy by exile or by death. Absence from the "ministry of the Word" was punished by a fine. "The State was the model of Christ's kingdom on earth." Gradually the spirit of the established religion smothered nearly every form of independence and liberty. The creation of a national, uncompromising church led the Congregationalists of Massachusetts to the indulgence of passions which, exercised upon them by their English persecutors, had driven them across the sea, and thus was the Archbishop of Canterbury justified by the men he had wronged. Massachusetts, after a vain attempt to silence the Quakers, made a vain attempt to banish them. She was as strongly set against what appeared to her as ruinous heresy as a healthy city is against the plague. The second general court of Massachusetts, which met May 18, 1631, is chiefly remarkable for the adoption of the theo- cratic basis on which for fifty years the government of the State con- tinued to rest. No man was thereafter recognized as a citizen and a voter who was not a member of some one of the colonial churches, and in order to obtain admission to one of them it was necessary to make an orthodox confession of faith, live conformably to Puritan decorum, and add to this a satisfactory religious experience, of which the substantial
-
--
641
HISTORY OF TENNESSEE.
part was an internal assurance of a change of heart and a lively sense of justification as one of God's elect .* In 1649 it was deemed necessary to support the fundamental doctrines of the theocracy by civil penalties. "Albeit faith is not wrought by the sword, but by the Word, nevertheless seeing that blasphemy of the true God can not be excused by any ignor- ance or infirmity of human nature, no person in this jurisdiction, whether Christian or pagan, shall wittingly or willingly presume to blaspheme His holy name, either by willfully and obstinately denying the true God, or His creation and government of the world, or shall curse God, or re- proach the holy religion of God, as if it were but an ingenious device to keep ignorant men in awe, nor shall utter any other eminent kind of blasphemy of like nature or degree under penalty of death."
Such was the nature of the relation in Massachusetts between Church and State. Every person was taxed for the support of the church in the same manner as he was to support the government, but was permitted to say to which individual church his money should be paid. And such laws disgraced the pages of the statutes of that State to a later date than were those of any other State similarly disfigured. On April 1, 1834, a bill was enacted into a law containing the following provisions:
No person shall hereafter become or be made a member of any parish or religious society so as to be liable to be taxed therein for the support of public worship, or for other parish charges without his express consent for that purpose first had and obtained.
No citizen shall be assessed or liable to pay any tax for the support of public worship or parish charges to any parish or religious society whatever other than that of which he - is a member.
In 1649 sixteen acts were forwarded to Maryland to which the gov- ernor was to obtain the assent of the Assembly. One of these was en- titled "An Act of Toleration." The first four sections of this celebrated act comprised but little of the tolerant spirit, as may be seen by a peru- - sal of their provisions: "All who shall blaspheme God, that is, curse Him, or who shall deny our Saviour Jesus Christ to be the Son of God, or shall deny the Holy Trinity, the Father, Son and Holy Ghost, or the Godhead of any of the said three persons of the Trinity, or the unity of the Godhead, or shall use or utter any reproachful speeches against the Holy Trinity, shall suffer death with forfeiture of lands and goods." Strange as it may seem, this death penalty for this offense darkened the statutes of Maryland for 200 years. No one was permitted under the law to utter any reproachful words or speeches concerning the Virgin Mary or the holy apostles or evangelists without suffering the penalty of a fine, and banishment for the third offense. No one was permitted to reproachfully call any one "heretic, schismatic, idolator, Puritan, Pres-
*Hildreth.
642
HISTORY OF TENNESSEE.
byterian," etc., without being compelled to submit to suitable punish- ment. "Liberty of conscience" was, however, provided for in the follow- ing words: "That the enforcing the conscience in matters of religion hath frequently fallen out to be of dangerous consequences in those commonwealths where it hath been practiced, and therefore for the more quiet and peaceful government of the province, and the better to preserve inutual love and unity, no person professing the religion of Jesus Christ shall be molested or discountenanced on account of his religion, nor in- terrupted in the free exercise thereof." It is clear, however, from a study of the history of the colony of Maryland that whatever liberty of conscience was here provided for to those who "believed the religion of Jesus Christ" was adopted for the sake of policy. for the reason that an exclus- ively Roman Catholic colony would not have been for a moment tolerated by the mother country, then under the domination of the Church of Eng- land.
The same idea is embodied in the Declaration of Rights prefixed to the constitution of 1776 in the following language: "All persons pro- fessing the Christian religion, are equally entitled to protection in their religious liberty," and while this declaration expressed the opinion that " no person ought to be compelled to frequent or maintain or contribute, unless on contract to maintain any particular place of worship, or partic- ular ministry, yet," it said, "the Legislature may in their discretion lay a general and equal tax for the support of the Christian religion." Later this was all changed and liberty of conscience granted in the follow- ing words: "That, as it is the duty of every man to worship God in such manner as he thinks most acceptable to Him, all persons are equally eu- titled to protection in their religious liberty."
Chapter III of the laws of Virginia passed in 1661, provided that " no minister be admitted to officiate in this country but such as shall produce to the Governour a testimonial, that he hath received his ordi- nation from some bishop in England, and shall then subscribe to be conformable to the orders and constitutions of the Church of Eng- land," etc. Chapter V provided that the liturgy of the Church of England should be read every Sunday, and no minister nor reader was permitted to teach any other catechism that that by the canons appointed and inserted in the book of common prayer, that no min- ister should expound any other than that, to the end "that our fun- damentals at least be well laid," and that no reader upon presumption of his own abilities should attempt to expound that or any other cate- chism or the Scriptures. Chapter VI, of the laws of 1705, provided for the punishment of "atheism, deism or infidelity" as follows: " If any
643
HISTORY OF TENNESSEE.
person or persons brought up in the Christian religion shall by writing, printing, teaching or advisedly speaking, deny the being of a God, or the Holy Trinity, or shall deny the Christian religion to be true, or the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments to be of divine author- ity, and shall be thereof legally convicted upon indictment or information in a general court of this, Her Majesty's colony and dominion, such per- son or persons for this offense shall be incapable or disabled in law to all intents and purposes whatever to hold and enjoy any office or employ- ment, ecclesiastical, civil or military, or any part of them or any profit or advantage to them appertaining or any of them." For the second of- fense " he, she or they shall from thenceforth be disabled to sue, prose- cute, plead or use any action or information in any court of law or equity, or to be guardian to any child, or to be executor or administrator of any person, or capable of any deed or gift or legacy, or to bear any office, civil or military, within this, Her Majesty's colony or dominion, and shall also suffer from the time of such conviction three years' imprisonment without bail or mainprise."
A remarkable change in the attitude of Christianity toward infidelity occurred between this time and the adoption of the constitution of 1776. Section 16 of the Bill of Rights prefixed to this constitution reads as follows: " That religion, or the duty which we owe to our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and convic- tion, not by force or violence; and, therefore, all men are entitled to the free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of conscience; and that it is the mutual duty of all to practice Christian forbearance, love and charity toward each other." This section has been incorporated into all the succeeding constitutions of Virginia, and still remains the embodi- ment of the sentiment of the people of that State as to religious tolera- tion.
- The celebrated "fundamental constitutions of Carolina," drawn up by John Locke, author of the "Essay on the Human Understanding," provides in Article XCV that "No man shall be permitted to be a free- man of Carolina, or to have any estate or habitation within it, that doth not acknowledge a God, and that God is publicly and solemnly to be wor- shiped." But when the constitution of North Carolina came to be adopted the sentiment of the people with reference to religious liberty found expression in the following language: "That all men have a natu- ral and unalienable right to worship Almighty God according to the dic- tates of their own consciences." But "That no person who shall deny the being of God, or the truth of the Protestant religion, or the Divine authority either of the Old or New Testaments, or who shall hold relig-
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.