Michigan official directory and legislative manual for the years 1921-1922, Part 62

Author: Michigan. Dept. of State. cn
Publication date: 1921
Publisher: Lansing : [State of Michigan]
Number of Pages: 956


USA > Michigan > Michigan official directory and legislative manual for the years 1921-1922 > Part 62


Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).


Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45 | Part 46 | Part 47 | Part 48 | Part 49 | Part 50 | Part 51 | Part 52 | Part 53 | Part 54 | Part 55 | Part 56 | Part 57 | Part 58 | Part 59 | Part 60 | Part 61 | Part 62 | Part 63 | Part 64 | Part 65 | Part 66 | Part 67 | Part 68 | Part 69 | Part 70 | Part 71 | Part 72 | Part 73 | Part 74 | Part 75 | Part 76 | Part 77 | Part 78 | Part 79 | Part 80 | Part 81 | Part 82 | Part 83 | Part 84 | Part 85 | Part 86 | Part 87 | Part 88 | Part 89 | Part 90 | Part 91 | Part 92 | Part 93 | Part 94 | Part 95


56


withdrawal of answers from, on breach of privilege.


69


spreading of protest on ...


87


spreading of minority report on.


140


Lobbying-


resolution prohibiting, held to be covered by rules


171


Members-


right of, to read authorities


12


sending for absent, under call of house ..


17


request for attendance of absent, after refusal to order call


validity of votes given for, while postmasters


24,


right of, to change vote ...


26, 70


disrespectful allusions of, to co-ordinate branch of government


41


second speech by, in debate ...


43


requiring of, to vote upon reconsideration .


60 87


recognition of .


112


right of, to floor 112,


129


protracted discussion in debate by, held dilatory.


147


admission of, in absence of quorum.


169


casting of votes by, when under arrest


177


Messages from Governor-


subject matter of resolution not recommended in, to special session 71


rejection of .


130


reference of, transmitting nominations to office


206


Minority-


report of .35, 36, 140, 157, 232


37


right of, to protest 104


Motions-


precedence of


80


refusal to entertain


81


to discharge committee of whole 8, 83, 100, 201 standing committee ... .95, 196, 201


notice of, to discharge standing committee. 192, 195


to make special, whether suspension of rules involved


199


18 24 25


election and qualification of .


right of, to vote, pending decision of contested election


25


right of, to have protest spread on journal


exclusion of report of, from journal .


LEGISLATIVE DECISIONS. 577


Motions-Con. Dec. No.


certain, held dilatory


128


to commit during taking of vote 132


relative to bill pending passage of another bill . 155


to commit cannot be laid on table. 218


Nays-See Yeas and Nays.


Newspapers-


reading of articles from, in debate. 103


Nominations to Office --


reference of . 206


Notice of Reconsideration-See Reconsideration.


Notices-


requiring of, for introduction of bills affecting city charters 158


of motion to discharge standing committee 192, 195, 196


Oath of Office- administration of, to secretary of senate 40


Pairs- not recognized by rules. 152


Personal Privilege-See Privilege.


Postmasters-


validity of votes given for, as candidates for legislature


Postponement- 24


indefinite, see Indefinite Postponement.


172


temporary, of business during call of the house


President-


held to have right to give casting vote in joint convention


73


President pro tem .-


right of, to vote.


27


right of, to vote.


183, 186


Previous Question-


on motion to indefinitely postpone 52, 215


precedence of call of senate over


53


prevention of debate by . 110, 231


131


amendment not in order after ordering .


167


yeas and nays after ordering .


168


adjournment while operating under


191


effect of, when not limited, after reconvening pursuant to adjournment .. 207


precedence of a demand for 229


Printing-


of report on the table. 57


of substitute in possession of committee of the whole. 58


of papers in possession of committee .. 59


discussion of motion for, and laying on table. 76


recommendations for, effect of . 156


.208


Privilege-


of acts of committee 45


of appeal relative to protest.


54


withdrawal of answers on breach of 69


introduction of resolution as question of . 88


question of, on failure to secure recognition


129


Protest-


privilege of appeal relative to 54


containing reflections on house


61


spreading of, on journal .


87


reflecting on senate.


92, 106


consistency of, with facts


101


right of minority to make 104


must not be personal . 105


Public Property- vote required to appropriate, to private use .... 78, 82, 85, 86, 96, 97,


Qualifications of Members-See Members.


Question-


division of, in concurring in adoption of report of conference committee. . 28


divisibility of, on motion to strike out all after word "Resolved" in joint


resolution. 30


impossibility of putting, as stated . 179 Question of Privilege-See Privilege.


Quorum-


counting of . 109, 122, 166


admitting members in absence of


169


Reading of Bills-See Bill.


73


1


98, 136, 139, 151, 159


substitution of bill does not necessitate reprinting


operation of, beyond main question


to time certain, of special order 173


President of the Senate-


.


578


MICHIGAN MANUAL.


Recall- Dec. No.


of resolution, question of.


42, 94


relative to matter already settled. 89


of bills from governor.


84


Recess-


motion for, held dilatory 128


under call of the house .. 161


motion for, as substitute for motion to fix time to which adjournment is to be taken ... 174


Reconsideration-


administration of oath to secretary, motion for, of election being on table .. requiring members to vote upon question of ..


40


of motion to dispatch sergeant-at-arms after absentees.


63,


68


notice of, does not cut off immediate.


64


of resolution not in possession of house.


65 66


of vote tabling appeal.


of reconsideration ..


67 91


tabling of motion for.


194


of vote on refusal to adopt report of committee of whole.


121


of indefinite postponement ..


123


of motion to lay on table motion for reconsideration.


138


motion for, only one in order after adverse vote.


144


more than one motion for, permissible.


153


notices of, barred by final adjournment.


170


of one of several amendments adopted collectively


205


matters that cannot be again considered without


212


of amended bill. .. 223


of vote same or following day


230


Report-


of committee of the whole, reconsideration of refusal to adopt. 121


requesting committee to make. 135


of conference committee


adoption of, passes bill.


15


division of question on adoption of .


28


may not recommend except as to matters of difference.


234


of minority-


receiving of . .35, 36, 140, 157, 232


exclusion of, from journal.


37


recommending printing of bill, effect of.


156


of select committee-


5


discharge of committee by.


48


Resolution-


presentation of, not question of privilege.


88


containing subject matter held to be covered by rules.


171


form of, proposing amendment to constitution ..


200


concurrent-


form of ..


21


containing legislation after fifty-day limit.


39


adoption of, similar to one already adopted and transmitted.


42


reconsideration of, not in possession of house.


65


subject matter of.


71


return of, refused.


89


recall of ..


. 94


consideration of, similar to one already considered.


116


declaring sense of legislature, not to require two-thirds vote.


119


substitution of bill for.


185


containing request, ruled out as imposing duty .


189


embracing legislation. 209, 210


joint-


divisibility of question of striking out all after word "Resolved" in. 30


take same course as bills.


34


introduction of, after fifty-day limit. 72


considered same as bills 72


136


Roll Call-


46


adjournment pending.


120


for counting quorum.


166, 214


Rules-


suspension of, order not being that of motions and resolutions 51


discharge of committee of the whole not a suspension of. 83. 199


adoption of, for special sessions. 99


vote required for suspension of. 124,


125


discussion of bill on motion for suspension of. 137


any action on bill already out of its regular course does not require sus- pension of. 146


60 62


after transmission of bill.


of vote on vetoed bill


108,


amendment of


for relief, vote required on


debate after commencement of


579


LEGISLATIVE DECISIONS.


Rules-Con.


Dec. No.


resolution containing subject matter held to be covered by . 171


refusal to entertain appeal, when sustaining would result in abrogating or


changing 184


commitment of bill to committee other than one indicated by president, a suspension of .. 184


Secretary of Senate- administration of oath to 40


Select Committee-See Committee.


Senate-See House.


Senate Chamber-


clearing of, and galleries during executive session 31


Senator-See Member.


Sergeant-at-arms-


payment of, for assisting in organization


Skeleton Bills-


introduction of


160


Speaker-


submitted question of order to house


not called on to decide constitutional questions 199


Special Committee- 221


may not report beyond matter referred to it 217


Special Orders- consideration of, conflicting . 113


postponement of . 172


putting question of fixing, when debate has been prolonged beyond time specified .


179


whether making bill special order involves suspension of rules. 199


Special Session-See Extra Session.


State Officers-


whether printed open letter is communication from


for substitute .3, 74, 148


relevancy of . 8, 38, 176


adoption of amendments to, between houses 14


motion to commit bill and, pending motion to table 49


printing of, in possession of the committee of the whole 58


concurrence in, of other house 77


motion for recess as substitute for motion to fix time to which to adjourn. . 174


substitution of original bill for original as substituted .. 178


substitution of bill for concurrent resolution . 185


for senate bill and house bill not good .. 193


substitution of motion to discharge committee of whole by motion to dis- charge standing committee. 201


substitution of bill does not necessitate reprinting.


208


motion to take from table not a proper, for motion to suspend rules for another purpose ..


213


adoption of, not changing general purpose of bill. 228


changing general purpose of bill not amendatory of original act 233


Suspension of Rules-See Rules.


Table-


indefinite postponement of motion to lay on. 32


administration of oath to secretary, motion to reconsider election being on motion to lay on table a motion to take from. 47


40


motion to lay on, before formal discharge of committee. 48


motion to commit bill and substitute pending motion to lay substitute on 49 motion to lay on table motion to lay on 50


printing of report on. 57


reconsideration of vote on motion to lay appeal on.


66


discussion of motion to lay on, and print ..


76


laying on, of motion to reconsider


108, 194


reconsideration of motion to lay on, motion to reconsider.


138


motion to take from table bill just laid on. 143


laying of bills on, after passage. 163


right of president of senate to vote on question of tabling appeal. 183


motion to commit cannot be laid on. 218


Third Reading-See Bill.


Tie Vote .- See Vote.


Two-thirds Vote .- See Vote.


Unconstitutionality-


of bill, no ground for point of order


154, 188


Veto- reconsideration of vote, on failure to pass bill over 91


Vote ---


validity of, given for postmasters as candidates for legislature 24


right of member to cast, pending decision in contested election case 25


1


identical with certain sections of bill for which proposed, not in order . 222


1


Substitute- 197


117, 118


-


580


MICHIGAN MANUAL.


Vote-Con.


change of . 26, 70, 126


right of president pro tem. to cast, in case of tie 27, 73


requiring member to cast, upon question of reconsideration 60


reconsideration of, tabling appeal 66


majority, required to concur in substitute of other house 77


required to discharge committee of the whole.


83


right of seated contestants to cast


93


indication of number present by . :109, 122


on resolution declaring sense of legislature.


119


required for suspension of rules 124,


125


changing and announcing of . 126


demand for yeas and nays after announcement of .


127


motion to commit during taking of


132


required on resolution for relief


136


two-thirds-


required to appropriate public property to private use .... . 78, 82, 85,


announcement of: 86, 96, 97, 98, 136, 139, 159


90


not required on appropriations for world's fairs . not required on any action on bill already out of its regular course 146 98 member casting, must be in seat .. 165


casting of, by member in custody of sergeant-at-arms 177


right of president of senate to give casting . 183, 186 Yeas and Nays-


demand for, after division ordered 13


after announcement of vote: 127


after ordering previous question 168


on amendments not part of report of committee of whole. 180


1. A motion to adjourn is in order during proceedings under call of the house .-- Church's Appeal, H. J. 1851, p. 272.


Undoubtedly so; in fact, when a call has failed to bring in a quorum, the only way to dispose of it is to adjourn, as no other motion is in order.


2. It is not in order to amend a bill after a motion to strike out all after the enacting clause has been put and lost .- Barry's Appeal, S. J. 1846, p. 257. Jones' Appeal, H. J. 1846, p. 57 (See 4).


A motion to amend takes precedence of a motion to strike out all after the enacting clause, and a motion to strike out is held in abeyance until all motions to amend are disposed of.


3. A substitute for a senate substitute for a house bill was held not in order .- H. J. 1851 (Ex. Session, p. 62).


It has been an uniform rule that a substitute for a substitute is never in order. This rule was designed to prevent confusion in offering amendments, and arbitrarily fixes a point beyond which they will not be permitted, the questions in their order being the main question, amendments, amendments to the amendment, and a substitute. In this case, there is no mulitiplicity of pending questions. The senate substitute came to the house as a new and entire proposition and should have been subject to amendment or substitution. The decision is not correct.


4. A proposition to strike out a section and insert a new one in lieu thereof having been lost, a motion to amend said section by striking out a portion thereof was held out of order .- H. J. 1870, p. 78.


The motion to strike out and insert a new section should have been held in abeyance for motions to amend the section. But if no such amendments are offered, and the motion to strike out is voted upon, it shuts off the consideration of any further amend- ments to the section.


5. The report of a select committee may be amended .- Etheridge's Appeal, S. J. 1839, p. 208.


The report of any committee is usually accepted without question, and then becomes the property of the house, to amend, adopt or reject, as it may please. An exception to this rule is that the report of a conference committee cannot be amended.


6. A motion to amend may be ruled out of order on account of irrelevancy .- Greenly's Appeal, S. J. 1840, p. 634.


If a proposed amendment is clearly irrelevant it certainly cannot be in order as all amendment. The house rules provide that "no motion or proposition on a subject different from that under consideration shall be admitted under color of an amendment." While the senate has no such rule, it is a general rule of practice that, although amend- ments may be inconsistent and incompatible with themselves or with the subject matter, they must at least relate to the subject under consideration.


Dec. No.


581


LEGISLATIVE DECISIONS.


. 7. A motion was made to strike out all after the enacting clause of a house bill and insert in lieu thereof a certain senate bill. The question was divided and the propo- sition to strike out was lost. A motion to amend the bill farther was then held out of order, as the senate had refused to strike out all after the enacting clause .- Summer's Appeal, S. J. 1480, p. 440.


The motion to substitute one pending bill for another is absolutely unnecessary., leads to confusion and should not be permitted. The question should not have been divided as the motion to strike out and insert is not divisible.


8. The committee of the whole having reported a substitute which did not relate to the subject matter of the bill and having been discharged, a point of order was raised while the report was under consideration as to the propriety of entertaining the substi- tute. Held, that, as the senate had discharged the committee, it was a virtual reception of the report, and that the bill and substitute were before the senate .- Howell's Appeal, S. J. 1844, p. 92.


The substitute was not properly before the senate for consideration for the reason that it was not germane to the original bill. The ruling was incorrect when made. Now the constitution provides that no bill shall be altered on its passage through the legislature, so as to change its original purpose.


9. An amendment in the senate to an amendment of a house amendment was held out of order .- Finley's Appeal, S. J. 1850, p. 329.


This decision is clearly wrong, for the reason that the house amendment came to the senate as an original proposition, and could be amended in the same way as could any other subject matter before the senate.


10. An amendment pending when the bill is committed falls .- Shoemaker's Appeal, S. J. 1850, p. 238.


The intent of the motion is to have the committee perfect the bill, instead of having amendments, which might be objectionable, adopted without due consideration.


11. When a bill has passed the senate and the house, and has been returned to the senate, the senate cannot amend those portions of the bill which have been agreed to by both houses .- Mead's Appeal, S. J. 1851 (Ex. Session), p. 87.


If a bill is returned with house amendments, no action can be taken by the senate on those parts which have been agreed to by both houses.


12. A member has a right to quote and read authorities in support of his argument on any pending question .- H. J. 1861, p. 1076.


The parliamentary practice in this regard is so well established that it is difficult to understand how the question could have been raised.


13. A demand for the ayes and nays is not in order after a division of the house is ordered .- Smith's Appeal, H. J. 1841, p. 682.


The congressional practice is to allow the requisite number of members to order the yeas and nays even after a division is had. It has also become the practice in this state to allow a demand for the yeas and nays at any time before the vote on the division is announced.


14. When the house adopts a substitute for a senate bill, and the senate concurs with certain amendments, the concurrence of the house to those amendments passes the bill .- Tucker's Appeal, H. J. 1840, p. 516.


The concurrence must be by yeas and nays. When the house has concurred in the senate amendments to the house substitute, every part of the bill as it stands has received the sanction of both houses.


15. A concurrence in the report of a conference committee by a majority of all the members-elect is a passage of the bill .- Conger's Appeal, S. J. 1858, p. 107.


Previous to the adoption of the Joint Rules of 1909, the vote on a report was required to be by yeas and nays, and was not adopted unless a majority of all the members-elect in each house, respectively, voted therefor. Under rule 5 of the present joint rules two votes are necessary-one on the adoption of the report, and one on the repassage of the bill. A yea and nay vote may be had on the former and is required on the latter.


16. At the first session of the legislature, under the constitution of 1850, it was held in the senate that a motion that the second reading of a bill be by its title only, was out of order under the constitution .- Le Roy's Appeal, S. J. 1851, p. 20. This ruling was confirmed in the senate of the next legislature, by two decisions that the reading of a bill by its title only "was not a reading of the bill within the meaning of the provision of the constitution."-Griswold's Appeal, S. J. 1853, pp. 12, 22. In the house of 1865, a motion having been made that the reading of a bill in extenso be dispensed with, on its third reading, and a point of order having been raised thereon, it was held that it is the right of any member to demand of the house, upon the third reading of a bill, to order that it be read by its title only .- Williams' Appeal, H. J. 1865, p. 1288. See also Williams' Protest, p. 1363, and Brockway's Resolution, p. 1655.


The practice for many years has been and now is to read bills the first and second times by title, and the third time at length, unless by unanimous consent the third


582


MICHIGAN MANUAL.


reading be dispensed with. Upon third reading of bills the reading at length is never dispensed with against the objection of a single member. If the reading of the bill is dispensed with by unanimous consent, it is "considered read" and the journal shows it to have been read. This reading of bills the first and second times by title and the third time at length is now considered a compliance with the constitutional provision which requires that every bill be read three times before the vote is taken on its passage and this legislative practice was held good by the supreme court (72 Mich. 446), the reasons given being that the courts ought not to overturn a legislative practice of such long standing, and that to hold otherwise would invalidate a large portion of the statutory law of the state.


17. Under the operation of a call and after the sergeant-at-arms had been dispatched after the absentees generally, a resolution to send the sergeant-at-arms after certain members (naming them), who have remained absent since the beginning of the [extra] session, was held not in order, as its adoption would be resolving a second time to do a thing which the house had already ordered .- H. J. 1870, p. 151.


The resolution was clearly out of order, as the sergeant-at-arms had already been dispatched after all absentees.


18. The senate having refused to order a call of the senate, a motion that the ser- geant-at-arms be directed to request the attendance of a senator was held out of order .- Barry's Appeal, S. J. 1841, p. 258.


It is difficult to see what parliamentary rule or practice justified the ruling out of order of this motion, even though the action requesting the attendance of a member would have no force.


19. A motion for a call of the senate is a debatable question .- S. J. 1850, p. 432.


The previous question would, of course, apply to this motion, the same as to other motions.


20. Under a call of the house, and after the bar has been closed and the sergeant-at- arms dispatched after the absentees, it was held that, as a quorum was present, the business of the house could proceed .- Chamberlain's Appeal, H. J. 1855, p. 191.


When a call of the house is occasioned by lack of a quorum, it is sometimes the prac- tice, upon obtaining a quorum, to dispense with further proceedings under the call, and sometimes to proceed with business under the call. But, the motion for a call is often for the purpose of securing a full vote on some pending question, and the fact that a quorum is present is well understood at the time the call is ordered. In such cases, after the vote on the pending question has been taken, it is the usual practice to dispense with further proceedings under the call.


21. The senate transmitted to the house a resolution described in the message as a "concurrent resolution," although headed with the usual formula of a joint resolution, i. e., " Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the State of Michigan." On motion to concur in the adoption of the resolution the point of order was raised that the resolution was a joint and not a concurrent resolution, and must take the course of a bill. Held, that it was a concurrent resolution, and the motion to concur in order .- Bushnell's Appeal, H. J. 1859, p. 130. See also Bushnell's Protest, p. 187.


Of course the words "Resolved by the Senate (the House concurring)," would have been the better form, but a concurrent resolution has no prescribed form. Whether or not a resolution was required to take the course of a bill depended, not upon its form, but upon its subject matter. Under the present constitution, all proposed legislation must be in the form of bills.


22. Held, that a committee of conference may recommend amendments to such parts of a bill as have been previously agreed upon by both houses .- Clark's Appeal, H. J. 1850, p. 448.


This decision is incorrect. It is only those parts of a bill upon which the two houses have failed to agree that are referred to a committee of conference. Therefore a con- ference committee has no authority to make recommendations relative to those parts of the bill which have been agreed to by both houses.


23. A conference committee having recommended certain new amendments, the question of order was raised that a committee of conference has no right to report, and the senate no right to concur in new amendments, which have not been the subject of disagreement between the two houses. Held, that the report of the committee was in order .- Isbell's Appeal, S. J. 1850, p. 425.


If by "new amendments" it is meant amendments to those parts of the bill concerning which there are differences between the two houses, the decision is correct. If by "new amendments" it is meant amendments to parts of the bill upon which the two houses have agreed, the decision is incorrect.


24. Held, that all votes given for a candidate who, on the day of the election, was a postmaster under the United States, were absolutely void in accordance with Sec. 6,


1


583


LEGISLATIVE DECISIONS.


Art. IV, of the constitution .- Sutherland v. Hoyt, H. J. 1853, pp. 26, 62; Morrow v. Horton, S. J. Feb. 24, 1891.


While the two decisions cited seem to be in accordance with the plain reading of the constitutional provision, the two houses of the legislature have for a great many years uniformly decided the other way, with the single exception of the latter case cited. (Morrow v. Horton, S. J. Feb. 24, 1891). Although the constitution seems to be very clear, both the house and senate have repeatedly refused to unseat a member because at the time of his election he held a United States, state or county office, as specified in section six, article four of the constitution (section six of article five of constitution of 1909).




Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.