USA > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Lincoln > Town Report on Lincoln 1891-1898 > Part 33
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39
Amount brought forward, . $286 05 John R. Hartwell, ¿ cord wood cut and
housed, 3 50
John R. Hartwell, cleaning around Town House, 7 00
Frank M. Dempsey, services as Constable, 13 00
Edward Bannon, 2 00
Wright & Potter Printing Co., blank returns of property, 78 F. E. Cousins, 20 tons furnace coal at $6.20, 124 00
Lincoln Water Works, Water at Town House, 10 00
Lincoln Water Works, at 43 hydrants, .
215 00
66 66 66 at 3 water troughs, 105 00
Waltham Tribune Co., 700 tax bills,
2 50
Albert E. Wood, surveying South Great Road,
70 00
M. M. Welch, storing hose carriage 2 years, 20 00
George E. Crosby & Co., printing Town Reports,
130 00
George E. Crosby & Co.,printing Warrants, 11 00
66 Stationery, 5 00
66
By - Laws, 25 00
66 10 Bonds, 15 00
66 66 Notices, etc.
14 50
Samuel Hartwell, services as Selectman, .
100 00
" Overseer of the
Poor,
25 00
Samuel Hartwell, services as Registrar, .
10 00
66 66 postage and stationery, 5 00
attendance at Court at Hearings of County Commissioners and various expenses as per bill, ·
30 35
Roger Sherman, services as Inspector of Cattle, etc., 1 year, . . .
185 00
60 00
John F. Farrar, services as Selectman, · " Overseer of the Poor, 25 00
Amount carried forward, " $1,499 68
.
56
Amount brought forward,
$1,499 68 John F. Farrar, services as Constable 2 years,
30 00
John F. Farrar, services as Registrar, .
10 00
66 66 " Fire Ward, '96, 5 00
66 journey to Tewksbury, .
5 00
66 66 services at Central Court, 5 59
William S. Briggs, services as Selectman, 60 00
6 " Overseer of
Poor, 25 00
William S. Briggs, services as Registrar, . 10 00
Lorenzo E. Brooks, “ " Constable, . 55 00
expense "
2 50
66 services and expense at
Central Court, . 31 54
Charles S. Wheeler, services as Assessor, 50 00
66 " Paymaster
State Road,
Charles S. Wheeler, collecting tax of 1896,
330 17
attending probate court,
3 60
services as Treasurer,
125 00
66 stationery, postage, ex- pressage and telephoning, . 11 00
Mrs. James Roach, abatement of tax on real estate, . ·
3 50
Wm. L. G. Peirce, services as Ballot Clerk, 4 00
Thomas L. Giles, 66 66
4 00
John F. Farrar, 66 Constable, Nov. 2,
4 00
Wm. Barrett, Agt., Insurance on Town House,
67 20
Herbert E. Barnes, returning 10 deaths, ·
2 50
James L. Chapin, services as Town Clerk, 73 50
" Registrar, ·
15 00
sealing scales, 2 00
66
expense,
1 95
66
& Son, supplies for Town
18 20
House,
James L. Chapin & Son, supplies for State Highway, .
1 57
Amount carried forward, $2,481 50
·
25 00
.
57
Amount brought forward, . $2,481 50
George L. Chapin, care of Town House, . 125 00
Samuel H. Pierce, services as Committee on State Highway, . 25 00
Thomas L. Giles, trip to Waltham, . 1 00
John F. Farrar, services as Committee on State Highway, 25 00
L. E. Brooks, services as Committee on State Highway, .
25 00
Charles S. Wheeler, abatement of taxes of George Wright for 1895 and 1896, (Sudbury River), ·
5 76
Charles S. Wheeler, abatement of tax of Julien de Cordova, by County Commis- sioners for year 1896, 20 00
William L. G. Peirce, services as Auditor, 12 00
Charles S. Wheeler, Collector, abatement of tax of Emeline Wheeler for 1897, 3 75
$2,724 01
Receipts brought down, .
.
2,197 75.
Expended above receipts,
.
. $526 26.
58
Recapitulation.
SELECTMEN'S ORDERS FROM FEB. 1, 1897, TO FEB. 1, 1898.
For Schools, . $5,539 62
School Superintendent,
.
349 98
Library,
735 41 ·
Cemeteries,
284 10
Temporary Loans,
21,000 00 .
Interest, ·
1,677 21
Support of Poor,
842 54
Military and State Aid,
48 00
Highways and Bridges
3,997 50
Village Improvement,
15 75
Street Lamps, .
101 52
Decoration Day, .
38 25
Miscellaneous Expenses, .
2,724 01
Extension of Water Works, (War- ner's), .
558 02
Payment of Water Bond, Due Dec. 1, 1897, ·
1,000 00
State Road,
3,250 80 ·
Public Improvement,
20 00
Counsel Fees, etc., by Committee on Claims, .
1,992 69
Board of Health
74 71
New Road near Wm. S. Briggs,
583 86
Settlement of Claims of Land near
Sandy Pond, . 163 54
Main Water Works and Station, 9,286 37
Repairs on Town House, · ·
486 85
.
.
.
-$54,770 73
59
JURY LIST.
The Selectmen present the following names of men qualified to serve as jurors for the ensuing year :
George H. Hoar,
Herbert J. Harrington,
Charles S. Smith,
Charles E. Nelson,
Clarence A. Brooks,
James B. Wheeler,
Charles P. Farnsworth,
Louis H. Whitney,
James T. Calkins,
Edwin B. Rice,
John F. Farrar,
Ephraim B. Flint,
Albert A. Cook,
John R. Hartwell,
Martin M. Welch,
Charles S. Wheeler,
John T. McGuire.
SAMUEL HARTWELL,
JOHN F. FARRAR,
WILLIAM S. BRIGGS,
Selectmen of Lincoln.
LINCOLN, Feb. 12, 1898.
ERRATUM. By mistake, on page 9, one paragraph at the end of the copy of the warrant was omitted in printing. The orig- inal warrant as posted and served ends with the following clause :
"And you are directed to serve this warrant by post- ing an attested copy thereof at each of the Post Offices, and in one of the churches, or one other public place, within the town, not less than seven days before the day appointed for such meeting and to make seasonable return thereof, with your doings thereon, to the Town Clerk. Hereof fail not.
Dated at Lincoln this twelfth day of February, in the year of our Lord, one thousand eight hundred and ninety-eight."
60
Report of the Committee on Claims.
The Committee on Claims which was chosen for the second time. at the last annual town meeting, presents the following report :
The committee has found considerable work to do during the year, as a number of controversies were left over from last year in an unsettled condition, and several new matters have arisen which required its attention. The tax cases, which have been a source of annoyance to the town, are now all disposed of with one exception, which is mentioned later in this report. We think it is fortunate that the town is no longer given undue prominence by reason of contests with tax-payers.
Nearly all the matters coming before the committee during the. year have related in some way to the water works. Several cases have arisen from the taking of land around the shores of the pond by the water board March 10, 1896. These cases are not of a serious character, as they are brought principally to preserve the rights of the owners to recover the value of their land, because. the law is so framed that their right to compensation would lapse. if suit is not brought within one year from the date of the taking. Compromises have been or can be made in most of these cases. The important controversies, however, have been those which involved the rights of the town to the waters of the pond. As is well known, the town of Concord held a meeting January 25, 1896, for the express purpose of authorizing its water board to. proceed against the town of Lincoln on account of our taking and use of the water. One of the first duties which the committee undertook upon coming into existence two years ago, was to col- lect all possible evidence and statistics necessary or useful in defending ourselves against future assaults upon our rights in the water. We expected that the first attack would come from the town of Concord ; but the case of Francis Smith against Lincoln, which was a writ of entry brought for the purpose of taking the engine house lot away from the town, is the first instance where those rights have been actually disputed in the courts. This case is explained later in the report. It is sufficient to say here that
61
the committee has regarded all controversies relating to the rights of the town in Sandy pond as of the utmost importance, and has used every proper means to protect the interests and property of the town in its water works.
The committee makes the following detailed statement as to what it has done about the various matters submitted to it by the town :
1. The Town of Lincoln v. The County Commissioners of Middlesex.
This is the petition which was referred to in our last report as pending in the Supreme Judicial Court to quash the proceedings of the County Commissioners in abating a personal tax assessed by Lincoln in 1894 upon the Thomas Dana estate, of which Julian de Cordova is the surviving trustee.
This is the last of the tax cases which have been submitted to the committee, and is the only one remaining unsettled. The rights of the town are fully protected by the filing of the petition and the case can be called up at any time.
2. Francis Smith v. The Town of Lincoln.
This suit was pending at the time of the last annual report and its nature is there described. Suffice it to say here that it is an action by which Smith seeks to obtain possession of the engine house and lot of land upon which the engine house is situated.
During the last year the case has come to trial ; first, before an auditor appointed by the Superior Court, who made a report in favor of the town upon every issue, and again before a jury of the Superior Court, who rendered a general verdict in favor of the town, and also three special verdicts declaring that the town had obtained a prescriptive right in both the waters of Sandy pond and the land occupied by the engine house. The case has been taken on exceptions by Smith to the Supreme Judicial Court where it has been argued fully by counsel upon both sides before the full bench. Sufficient time has not elapsed, however, since the argu- ments to obtain a final decision.
It was developed at the trial of this case that the principal ground upon which Smith relied was the claim that the town had no right to build or maintain a system of water works, inasmuch as a formal taking of the waters of Sandy pond was not made in 1874 or 1875 when the works were started. It was contended
62
that, inasmuch as the town had no right to use the water at all, it could not as an incident to such use take and hold land for the building of the engine house or reservoir. The same argument would deny the right to borrow money and to issue bonds for water purposes. Realizing the importance of the case and the vital questions involved, the committee authorized the regular counsel of the town to procure additional counsel and the case has been defended with all the vigor and thoroughness possible. The dis- astrous consequences of an adverse decision, if it should involve a denial of the right of the town to the [waters of Sandy pond, cannot be overestimated. The committee has expended, and believes it was justified in expending, a large amount of money in the defence of this suit. The town has never had any litiga- tion of greater importance, because we have reason to believe from the action of Concord at its meeting January 25, 1896, that if the Supreme Court should decide against the town upon the ground that we have no right to the water, Concord would imme- diately assert an exclusive title to the pond and also demand large money damages from the town. In any event, whether or not the town ultimately maintained its title to the water, an adverse decision would probably invite years of costly litigation.
3. Francis Smith v. The Town of Lincoln.
This is another suit by the same plaintiff for the purpose of recovering damages for the taking of certain land by the town March 10, 1896, for water purposes. This suit was begun at just about the date of the last annual meeting, and has not yet in the course of law come to trial.
4. Charles S. Smith v. The Town of Lincoln.
This is a petition for the assessment of damages brought at the same time as the preceding petition and for the same purpose. Like the preceding case it has not yet come to trial. No propo- sitions of settlement in either of these cases have been made to the committee.
5. Edna G. Calef v. The Town of Lincoln.
This is a petition for the assessment of damages for land taken upon the shores of Sandy pond by the town March 10, 1896. The petition was filed in the Superior Court of Middlesex County March 8, 1897, the notice thereon being returnable May 3, 1897.
63
The case is now upon the trial list of the Superior Court and may be disposed of at the present sitting. The petitioner has made certain propositions of settlement and the committee has made other propositions, but the parties have not yet agreed, although it is possible that they may do so.
6. Helen V. V. Warren v. The Town of Lincoln.
This is another petition growing out of the same taking of land for water purposes. The petition was filed in the Superior Court for Middlesex County February 25, 1897, and the notice thereon was returnable April 5, 1897. This case and the following were dealt with together by the committee and an adjustment has been reached in both of them which is explained below.
7. George G. Tarbell v. The Town of Lincoln.
This case is also a petition for the assessment of damages aris- ing out of the taking of land above mentioned. 'The petition was filed in the Superior Court for Middlesex County February 26, 1897, and and the notice thereon was returnable May 3, 1897. This case and the preceding have been considered by your com- mittee together. It was agreed by the counsel representing the two petitioners and the counsel for the town that the damages occasioned by the taking in each case should be assessed by this committee. Accordingly the committee gave notice to the parties and a hearing was held in which the members of the committee sat as referees. It was claimed by each of the petitioners at the hearing that the taking of land by the town greatly damaged their respective estates, inasmuch as access to the pond might be cut off thereby. Apparently these were the only cases of those aris- ing under the taking by the water board of March 10, 1896, where it could be fairly claimed that the takings affected injuriously the value of the contiguous estates, and the committee felt that they stood upon somewhat different footing than the takings of ordinary wood land. In the Tarbell case there were really two takings ; one of a strip of land bordering on Sandy pond at the foot of his estate, and the other of a strip of land on the shore of a detached wood lot. The taking from the wood lot did not damage the remainder of it, but the claim was urged that the other taking greatly diminished the value of the contiguous estate.
64
The counsel for Dr. Tarbell claimed that $3,000 should be awarded as damages, and the counsel for Mrs. Warren claimed the sum of $1,500. These claims were made largely because of fear that the town might arbitrarily cut off the owners of the property from access to the pond. It seemed to the committee possible to remove this danger and at the same time preserve all the rights which the town had taken in the land for the purpose of preserving the purity of the water; and the suggestion was accordingly made to the petitioners that the matter be compro- mised by the town retaining all rights in the land necessary to protect the purity of the water, but releasing all other rights. It has finally been agreed between the committee and the petition- ers, subject of course to the vote of the town, that the town shall retain, in a strip fifty feet wide above high-water mark on the shore of the pond, all rights and easements relating to the preservation of the purity of the water, but shall release to the petitioners all other rights, such as possible rights of flowage, etc., and shall permit the owners of the property to have access to the water, and in general to make any use of the land which is not inconsistent with the purposes for which it is held by the town, and which may be permitted from time to time by the water board. The damages agreed upon, in the event that this compromise is made, are $300 in the Tarbell case and $150 in the Warren case. These sums include the court costs and expenses.
The committee recommend that this compromise be made by the town, and the necessary votes be passed which will enable the selectmen and water board to carry it into effect. An appropriate article for that purpose has been inserted in the warrant.
8. By-Laws.
There was also imposed upon the committee the duty of draft- ing by-laws for the town. The committee has attended to that duty. By-laws were drafted and adopted by the town at a meeting held March 1, 1897, and afterward they were submitted upon petition to the Superior Court, by which they were formally approved June 19, 1897. They were then published a newspaper, and since that they have been operative within the limits of the town.
65
The principal subject covered by the by-laws is finances. The committee endeavored to institute a system of keeping the accounts of the town which is simple and, at the same time, accurate. This they believe they have succeeded in doing.
In view of the unsettled controversies which are now pending, the committee believes that it is advantageous to choose a com- mittee on claims under section three of article six of the by- laws for the ensuing year. The propositions and suggestions which have been made between the parties in the various contro- versies which are now pending may result in nothing if a change is made at present in the method of handling these cases.
Respectfully submitted,
CHARLES F. ADAMS, WILLIAM S. BRIGGS, CHARLES S. WHEELER.
66
Report of the Committee on Public Improvements.
The Committee on Public Improvements respectfully submit the following report :
During the past year a row of trees has been set out under the direction of the committee, on the new cut-off road between the village of Lincoln and the railway station. . Last summer was remarkably favorable for setting out trees, and there is every reason to believe that the small amount done by the committee at the point indicated will hereafter produce satisfactory results.
In relation to the proposed memorial on the Lexington road, to indicate the spot where Paul Revere is supposed to have been captured on the morning of the 19th of April, the committee would report that the erection of the memorial was not to take place until the portion of the state highway, within the limits of the town, had been finished. This work was not completed until November last, when the season was so far advanced that the committee concluded further action might well be deferred until spring.
An examination of the records shows that Paul Revere was not captured at the point indicated, but that he and Dr. Prescott were there encountered by a small crowd of British soldiers stationed at an opening in the fence. Paul Revere was detained. Dr. Pres- cott, without dismounting, leaped the low stone wall into the adjoining field, from which he tried to make a passage through the woods below. He here encountered a part of the British force by which he was detained. Neither Paul Revere nor Dr. Prescott complained of harsh or inconsiderate treatment. They would appear simply to have been detained as a matter of precaution.
Whether, under these circumstances, a memorial at the point indicated is altogether desirable is matter for the consideration of the town. It would simply appear that at this point the celebrated ride of Paul Revere may be said to have terminated.
The committee would ask that the sum of $100 be put at its disposal to be applied to such work as the committee may deem it expedient to undertake during the coming town year.
Respectfully submitted,
CHARLES F. ADAMS,
Committee.
S. H. PIERCE,
67
REPORT OF ASSESSORS.
The Board of Assessors submit the following report :
Number of residents assessed on property
223
" non-residents assessed on property 84 .
66 assessed on polls only .
172
66 of acres of land assessed
8,736
66 " dwelling-houses assessed
185
" horses assessed
397
66 " cows assessed .
698
" neat cattle other than cows assessed
77
66 " swine assessed
351
66 " fowls 66
4,750
Value of land, exclusive of buildings, $395,778 00
66 " buildings, exclusive of land, 428,045 00
46 " real estate
$823,823 00 .
66 " personal estate .
1,041,454 00
Total valuation .
. $1,865,277 00 .
State Tax
$1,610 00
Sudbury River Tax
18 22
County Tax .
2,178 74
Town Grants
20,023 00
Overlayings
110 00
Total
$23,939 96
Assessed on Personal Estate
$13,018 17
66 " Real Estate .
.
.
10,297 79
66 " Polls
624 00
Total
.
$23,939 96
Abatements .
$9 75
CHARLES S. WHEELER, WM. C. PEIRCE, WM. H. SHERMAN,
Assessors.
·
.
.
.
.
.
·
RESIDENT TAX - PAYERS.
Name of Residents.
Aggregate Value of Personal Estate.
Total Tax on Personal Estate.
Aggregate Value of Real Estate.
Total Tax on Real Estate.
Total Cash Tax on Personal and Real Estate.
Adams, Charles F.
$155,080
$1,938 50
$50,000
$625 00
$2,563 50
Adams, John, Estate of
.
7,284
91 05
91.05
Adams, J. Frank .
·
.
3,595
44 94
3,000
37 50
82 44
Adams, J. Q., trustee
.
.
22,220
277 75
277 75
Baker, George M.
1,000
12 50
4,215
52 69
65 19
Baker, George M., trustee
625
7 82
50
63
41 45
Baker, Walter F ..
1,270
15 88
7,500
93 75
109 63
Bamforth, Mrs. Chas. S.
50
63
1,500
18 75
19 38
Bannon, Edward
·
1,325
16 57
8,500
106 25
122 82
Bean, George H., Estate of
1,660
20 75
20 75
Bean, George N.
235
2 94
2,700
33 75
36 69
Bemis, Julia A.
61,539
769 24
3,000
37 50
806 74
Benjamin, Wm. O.
25
32
3,300
41 25
41 57
Bent, Israel A.
75
94
94
Bent, Sarah S.
2,000
25 00
25 00
Blodgett, Minnie P.
14,000
175 00
175 00
Blodgett, Warren K., trustee
414 40
Boyce, John .
·
905
11 32
6,000
75 00
86 32
Bradley, Edward E.
·
·
150
1 88
1 88
Bragg, James
·
·
8
10
10
Briggs, Laura F.
3,500
43 75
43 75
Briggs, Wm. S.
.
·
490
6 13
6 13
·
7 82
Baker, James E.
·
·
3,265
40 82
1,600
20 00
20 00
Barnes, Herbert E.
.
33,152
414 40
.
·
·
.
.
68
Brooks, Aaron, Heirs of
2,400
30 00
30 00
Brooks, Albert S. .
545
6 82
5,100
63 75
70 57
Brooks, Levi F. ·
20
25
1,050
13 13
13 38
Brooks, Lorenzo E.
200
2 50
4,260
53 25
55 75
Browning, Geo. W.
575
7 19
2,000
25 00
32 19
Browning, Mrs. Sarah
400
5 00
5 00
Burgess, John A. .
60
75
75
Burnett, Mary
500
6 25
6 25
Burnham, John A., trustee
375,000
4,687 50
4,687 50
Bulger, Martin
540
6 75
4,000
50 00
56 75
Butcher, James A.
260
3 25
4,200
52 50
55 75
Cahill, Annie
290
3 63
2,500
31 25
34 88
Calkins, James T. .
195
2 44
1,300
16 25
18 69
Campbell, Ellen M.
3,150
39 38
7,500
93 75
133 13
Chapin, Emily F. .
537
6 72
500
6 25
12 97
Chapin, George L.
3,500
43 75
43 75
Chapin, Henry C., Estate of .
2,500
31 25
31 25
Chapin, James L.
·
.
220
2 75
4,500
56 25
59 00
Chapin & Son, James L.
1,000
12 50
12 50
Clark, Mrs. J. W.
325
4 07
4 07
Coan, Thomas
270
3 38
2,000
25 00
28 38
Codman, Ogden
·
.
3,475
43 44
50,000
625 00
668 44
Connott, Truatt
155
1 94
1,200
15 00
16 94
Conway, Rosanna
390
4 88
1,500
18 75
23 63
Cook, Abbie M.
4,500
56 25
56 25
Cook Bros.
·
440
5 50
14,500
181 25
186 75
Cook, Isaac B.
480
6 00
4,000
50 00
56 00
Corrigan, Peter
70
88
1,500
18 75
19 63
Cousins, Ann E.
3,300
41 25
41 25
Cousins, Fred. E. .
1,335
16 69
16 69
.
·
.
.
·
.
.
·
·
·
.
·
.
·
.
.
.
·
·
.
.
· ·
69
Name of Residents.
Aggregate Value of Personal Estate.
Total Tax on Personal Estate.
Aggregate Value of Real Estate.
Total Tax on Real Estate.
Total Cash Tax on Personal and Real Estate.
Cousins, Geo. L.
4 44
Cousins, Nathaniel F.
165
2 07
1,200
15 00
17 07
Craven, Patrick
400
5 00
5 00
Cunningham, Geo. B.
500
6 25
3,000
37 50
43 75
Curry, John .
80
1 00
1,000
12 50
13 50
Dana, Elizabeth
950
11 88
18,000
225 00
236 88
De Cordova, Julian
.
·
·
130
1 63
1,000
12 50
14 13
Dempsey, Frank M.
650
8 13
2,500
31 25
39 38
Dempsey, Michael
140
1 75
1,000
12 50
14 25
Dodge, Katie F. P.
25
32
3,200
40 00
40 32
Dougherty, Andrew J.
390
4 88
1,600
20 00
24 88
Dougherty, Dennis
58
73
1,500
18 75
19 48
Driscoll, John J.
200
2 50
1,650
20 63
23 13
Dutcher, Edwin
.
100
1 25
1 25
Ehlert, Albert
50
63
1,500
18 75
19 38
Ellsworth, Matthew
670
8 38
3,000
37 50
45 88
Eveleth, Julius E. .
1,325
16 57
11,160
139 50
156 07
Farnsworth, Chas. P.
340
4 25
4 25
Farrar, Edward R.
400
5 00
9,054
113 30
118 30
Farrar, Herbert W.
·
90
1 13
1,000
12 50
13 63
Farrar, John F.
·
250
3 13
2,000
25 00
28 13
Farrar, John W. .
.
75
94
4,300
53 75
54 69
·
355
4 44
·
De Cordova, Mary E. D.
400
5 00
2,500
31 25
36 25
Dee, John
Delehanty, Richard
70
.
·
First Parish
3,500
43 75
43 75
Fitzgerald, Wm.
330
13
1,200
15 00
19 13
Fleming, John
300
3 75
3 75
Flint, Edward F.
175
2 19
1,500
18 75
20 94
Flint, George
63,390
792 38
17,010
212 62
1,005 00
Flynn, John
350
4 38
1,500
18 75
23 13
Foster, Helen F.
4,000
50 00
50 00
Giles, Thomas L.
1,700
21 25
21 25
Gould, Lucinda, Heirs of
1,455
18 19
18 19
Hagar, Mary A.
50
63
63
Hall, Ella E.
3,000
37 50
37 50
Ham, Hepsebab
·
.
100
1 25
·
·
385
1 82
5,730
71 63
76 45
Harrington, Herbert J. .
410
5 13
·
.
.
175
2 19
2 19
Hart, Joseph S.
.
250
3 13
12.700
153 75
161 88
Hartwell, John R.
915
11 44
4,000
50 00
61 44
Hartwell, Julia W.
630
7 88
· .
.
·
7 88
Hartwell, Lucy B.
1,900
23 75
2,500
31 25
55 00
Hartwell, Samuel
12,390
154 88
10,000
125 00
279 88
Hayden, Frederick A.
3,000
37 50
1,400
17 50
55 00
Haynes, Elizabeth, Estate of .
4,500
56 25
56 25
Hoar, George H. .
440
5 50
3,600
45 00
50 50
Hoar, Leonard, Heirs of
500
6 25
6 25
Hodges, Ann F.
7,500
93 75
93 75
Hosey, William
·
355
4 44
1,500
18 75
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.