USA > California > History of California, Volume VI > Part 28
Note: The text from this book was generated using artificial intelligence so there may be some errors. The full pages can be found on Archive.org (link on the Part 1 page).
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15 | Part 16 | Part 17 | Part 18 | Part 19 | Part 20 | Part 21 | Part 22 | Part 23 | Part 24 | Part 25 | Part 26 | Part 27 | Part 28 | Part 29 | Part 30 | Part 31 | Part 32 | Part 33 | Part 34 | Part 35 | Part 36 | Part 37 | Part 38 | Part 39 | Part 40 | Part 41 | Part 42 | Part 43 | Part 44 | Part 45 | Part 46 | Part 47 | Part 48 | Part 49 | Part 50 | Part 51 | Part 52 | Part 53 | Part 54 | Part 55 | Part 56 | Part 57 | Part 58 | Part 59 | Part 60 | Part 61 | Part 62 | Part 63 | Part 64 | Part 65 | Part 66 | Part 67 | Part 68 | Part 69 | Part 70 | Part 71 | Part 72 | Part 73 | Part 74 | Part 75 | Part 76 | Part 77 | Part 78 | Part 79 | Part 80 | Part 81 | Part 82 | Part 83 | Part 84 | Part 85 | Part 86 | Part 87
248
SOCIETY.
other hand, the sudden abundance of means exploded economic habits in general, and the prevalence of high prices and speculative ideas, together with the absence of restraining family ties, did not tend to promote prudence.
In this short, spirited race between representatives of all nationalities and classes, save the very poor and the rich, all started under certain primitive conditions, unfettered by traditional and conventional forms, yet assisted by the training and resources derived from their respective cultures. Some aimed short-sightedly only for the nearest golden stake, and this gained, a few retired contented; most of them, however, con- tinued in pursuit of ever-flitting visions. Others, with more forethought and enterprise, enlisted wider agen- cies, organization, machinery, and for a greater goal; and seizing other opportunities by the way, they mul- tiplied the chances of success in different directions. While accustomed to subdue the wilderness, Yankee character and institutions have here demonstrated their versatility and adaptiveness under somewhat different conditions, and in close contest with those of other nationalities, by taking the decisive lead in evolving from magnificent disorder the framework for a great commonwealth, the progress of which structure is presented in the succeeding chapters. 82
82 For fuller and additional authorities bearing on early California society, I refer to Burnett's Recoll. of Past, MS., i .- ii., passim; Bartlett's Statement, MS., 2-3, 7-9; Barry and Patten's Men and Mem., 46, 61-92, 144-8, 223, 251, 351; Carson's Early Recoll., 21, 25-6, 29; Janssen's Vida y Av., 198; Arm- strong's '49 Experiences, MS., 8, 12; Larkin's Doc., vi. 41, 43, 51-2, 66, 144, 172, 175, 195, 198; vii. 92, 140, 206, 219, 231, 287, 338; Clarke's Statement, MS., 1-2; Hyde's Hist. Facts on Cal., MS., 9-13; Dow's Vig. Com., MS., 2, 5; Davis' Glimpses, MS., 265-78: Farnham's Cal., 22-7, 271-4; Fay's Historical Facts, MS., 1-3, 10; Fernandez, Cal., 184, 189-92; Annals of S. F., passim; Du Hailly, in Rev. des deux Mondes, Feb. 15, 1859, 932; Bauer's Statement, MS., 2-3, 5; Alger's Young Miner, passim; Bouton's Cal. Indians, MS .; Arch. Monterey Co., xiv. 18; Beadle's Western Wilds, 38; Averill's Life in Cal., pas- sim; Bancroft's Hand-book; A View of Cal., 167; Ariz. Arch., iii. 297; Antioch Ledger, July 1, 1876; Barstow's Statement, MS., 1-4, 7-12; Cal., The Digger's Hand-book, 7, 36-41, 49-54, 65-71; Buffum's Six Months, 83-4, 117-18, 121, 124; Dutch Flat Enquirer, Nov. 26, 1864; Farwell's Vig. Com., MS., 5; John- son's Cal and Ogn, 96-209, 236, 244; Kelly's Excursion, ii. 244-9; Schmiedell's Statement, MS., 4-6, 145-6; Frisbie's Reminisc., MS., 36-7; Garniss' Early Days of S. F., MS., 8-23, 29-32; Frink's Vig. Com., MS., 25; Blurome's Vig. Com., MS., 1, 5; Gerstäcker, Kreutz und Quer: Kip's Cal. Sketches, 18-19; Lambertie, Voy. Pittoresque, 202-9; Lett's Cal. Illust., 48-55, 70-129; Alameda
249
AUTHORITIES.
Reporter, May 31, 1879; Kanesv., Iowa, Front Guard, May 16, 1849; Feb. - , 1850; Polynesian, iv. 162, 183, 207; v .- vii., passim; Merrill's Statement, MS., 2-6, 9-10; Lawson's Autobiog., MS., 11-17; Currey's Incidents, MS., 4, 8; Fre- mont's Year Amer. Travel, 66-8, 98-103, 112-13, 148; Brooks' Four Months, 83, 201-2; Doolittle's Statement, MS., 21-2; Drinkwater, in Miscel. Statements, 1-2; Gillespie's Vig. Com., MS., 1-6; Carson City Trib., Sept. 23, 1879; Chico Enterprise, Aug. 8, 1879; Bryant's What I Saw in Cal., 427; Schenck's Vig. Com., MS., 14, 16, 20, 22, 44-8; Earll's Statement, MS., 6, 8-10; Cox's Annals of Trinity Co., 62-3; Conway's Early Days in California, MS., 1-2; Brewer's Reminisc., MS., 35-7; Helper's Land of Gold, 36-9, 47, 63-75, 82-4, 144, 158, 167-9, 237-53; Delano's Life, 249-54, 289-90, 365; Grimshaw's Narrative, MS., 14; Borthwick's Three Years in Cal., 46-67, 77, 83-5, 127, 151-4, 165-6, 289, 334, 357-74; Hancock's Thirteen Years, MS., 119-20; Hall's Hist., 232; Green's Life und Adv., MS., 17, 19; Guide to Cal., 80-132, 157; Kirkpatrick's Journal, 14-16; Gold Hill News, Nov. 29, 1867; Geary, in Miscel. Statements, 5; Haw- ley's Observations, MS., 5, 9-10; Bolton vs U. S., App. to Brief, 99-101; Bing- ham, in Solano Co. Hist., 333; Dameron's Autobiog., 22-3; Hunt's Merch. Mag., xx. 458; xxi. 136; xxii. 696; xxxi. 114, 386; Los Ang. Star, May 14, 1870; King's Rept on Cal., 7, 215; Hittell, in Dietz' Our Boys, 166-8, 174-7, 179; Brown's Statement, MS., 14; Dean's Statement, MS., 1-2; Marin Co. Hist., 121; Mason's Rept; Massett's Exper. of a '49er, 10; Bennett, in Sawtelle's Proneers, 5; Ward's Letter of Aug. 1, 1849, in New York Courier and Enquirer; Nevada Journal, Dec. 19, 1856; Nevada Gaz., May 2, 1864; Sonora Union Dem., Sept. 29, 1877; Morse, in Direct. Sac., 1853-4, 5-10; Berkeley Advocate, Dec. 25, 1879; Cray's Vig. Com., MS., 1; Costa R., Atl. and Pac. R. R., 7-16; Hübner's Ramble around the World, 146; New West, 342; Evans' A la California, 226, 236, 272, 359, etc .; Dilke's Greater Britain, 209, 228-32; Red Bluff Sentinel, June 14, 1873; New and Old, 35, 37, 69; McCollum's Cal. as I Saw It, 33-6, 60-3; Dana's Two Years, 432; Nidever's Life and Adv., MS., 139; Low's Observations, MS., 4-7; Hutchings' Illust. Cal. Mag., i. 33, 78, 83, 215, 300, 416, 464; ii. 401; iii. 60, 129, 210, 254; v. 297, 334-7; Holinski, La Cal., 108-10, 136; Benton, in Hayes' Scraps, Cal. Notes, v. 60; Bigler's Diary, MS., 77-9; S. I. Friend, vi. 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 85, 88, 96; vii. 8, 15, 69, 74; viii. 28, 95, etc .; S. I. News, ii., passim; Morse's Pion. Exp., MS., 7; Colton's Deck and Port, 352, 386, 401; Pioche Journal, June 4, 1875; Pierce's Rough Sketch, MS., 105-8, 111; Cole's Vig. Com., MS., 3; Mex., Revol. Sta Anna, 154; Pan. Star, Feb. 24, 1849; Commerce and Navig. Repts, 1850-67; Overland Monthly, xiv. 320, 327-8; xv. 241-8, etc .; Nouv. Annales, 1849, 3, 224; Parson's Life of Marshall, 96, 99-103, 157; Connor's Early Cal., MS., 2; Coast Review, Oct. 1877, 377; Oakland Transcript, March 1, 1873; May 5, 1875; March 25, July 14, 1877; Monterey Herald, Feb. 13, 1875; Le National, Oct. 4, 1869; Russian River Flag, Jan. 9, 1873; Morse's Statement, MS .; Henshaw's Hist. Events, MS., 1-2, 7-8; Hesperian, ii. 10, 492, 494; Rednitz, Reise, 106; Olney's Vig. Com., MS., 1-3; Ventura Free Press, Sept. 29, 1877; Mining and Scientific Press, Aug. 3, 1878; Lyon Co., Nev., Times, March 24, 1877; San Diego Arch., 331; San Diego Herald, Dec. 5, 1874; Frignet, La Cal., 83, 94, 117, 121-2, 135; Foster's Gold Regions, passim; Cerruti's Ramblings, 25-7, 50, 67; Clemens' Roughing It, 410, 417, 444; Home Missionary, xxii. 92-3, 163-7, 186; xxiii. 208-9; xxvii. 159-60; London Quart. Rev., Jan. 1881, 45-6; Pion. Mag., i. 174; ii. 80; iii. 80-1, 147; iv. 314; Player-Frowd's Six Months in Cal., 22-3; Placerville Republ., July 19, 1877; Coke's Ride, 354-7; Pion. Arch., 29-31; S. F. Occident, March 5, 1874; S. F. News Letter, Jan. 17, 1874; S. F. Exchange, Jan. 13, 1876; Elite Directory, 1879, 11-19; S. F. Golden Era, March 8, 1874; Jan. 26, 1878; S. F. Chronicle, July 6, 1878; June 4, 1879; Oct. 3, 31, 1880; S. F. Call, Jan. 6, 28, March 1, Aug. 23, 1865; Sept. 1, 1866; Aug. 1, 1867, etc .; San Jose Pioneer, Aug. 4, Dec. 1, 14, 1877; Feb. 16, May 4, July 27, 1878; Aug. 16, 1879; Hist. San Jose, 209-16; San Joaquin Co. Hist., 21, 23, 34-5; S. F. Times, Jan. 12, 1867; S. F. Town Talk, Apr. 10, 1857; S. F. Post, Apr. 3, 1875; Feb. 10, 1876; July 27, Nov. 1, 23, 1878; Chamberlain's State- ment, MS., 1; Cassin's Statement, MS., 5-7, 10-18; Hist. Doc. Cal., 1-508; Olympia Standard, July 22, 1876; Sargent, in Nevada Grass Val. Direct., 1856, 29-31; Sta Cruz Sentinel, Feb. 20, 1875; Sta Cruz Times, March 12,
250
SOCIETY
1870; Ross' Narrative, MS., 12, 15-18; Roach's Hist. Facts, MS., 3; Modesto Herald, Feb. 14, 1878; Richardson's Mining Exper., MS., 10-11, 27-30; Mel- bourne Morn. Herald, March 29, 1849; Hist. of Los Ang., 73-4; Lloyd's Lights and Shades, 18-21, 513-16; Robinson's Cal. and its Gold Regions, 10, 105, 214; Capron's Hist. Cal., 125-6, 129, 146, 165, 220, 233; Roach's Statement, MS., 2-3, 9; Campbell's Circular Notes, i. 98-129; Revue des Deux Mondes, Feb. 1, 1849, 475; Miscellany, ix., pt. i. 77; McDaniels' Early Days, MS., 6, 49-50; Sac. Union, Dec. 16, 1854; Sept. 1, 1855; March 13-15, Apr. 4, May 21, June 26, Sept. 16, Dec. 25, 26, 31, 1856; Sept. 14, 1858; Sept. 4, 1865, etc .; Sac. Bee, June 12, 1874; Sac. Wkly Bee, Aug. 16, 1879; Shasta Courier, March 25, 1865; Shaw's Golden Dreams, 37-42, 47, 179-83; Catholic World, 795, 807; Cal., Pop. and Col. Scraps, 126-7; Sayward's Pioneer Remin., MS., 4, 29-33; Ryan's Pers. Adv., ii. 170-220, 250-7, 265-6; Id., Judges and Crim., 80-2; Cal. Pilgrim, 54, 136; S. F. Bulletin, Jan. 2, March 29, Apr. 1, July 7, 8, Aug. 5, Sept. 15, 20, 25, Nov. 27, Dec. 4, 1856; Sept. 27, 1862; Feb. 28, Oct. 28, 1865; Apr. 30, 1866; Jan. 23, 25, 1867, etc .; Cal., Pion. Celebrations Scraps, 8-10; Id., Polit. Scraps, 123; Cal. Archives, Unbound Doc., 20, 55, 56, 58, 59, 64-7, 224-6, 228, 319-20, 322-3, 328-9; Cal., Advent. of a Captain's Wife, 18, 20, 27-8, 41-2; Cal. Past and Present, 107-9, 149-50, 159-60, 163; Sacramento Illust., 8, 12-13; The World Over, 92-110; The Mines, Miners, etc., 790-1; Thomas, in Sac. Direct., 1871, 52-3, 76, 1034; McCabe's Our Coun- try, 1054-6; Mayne's Br. Columbia, 157, 163; The World Here and There, 14-27; Matthewson's Statement, MS., 2-3; Sutton's Early Exper., MS., passim; Stockton Indep., Aug. 31, 1878; July 28, 1879; Soule's Statement, MS., 2, 4; El Sonorense, May 2, 1849, p. 4; La Armonía Social (Guadalajara), March 2, 1849; Miller's Songs of the Sierras, 69, 70, 280; Solano Press, Dec. 11, 1867; Solano Co. Hist., 164; Wilmington Enterprise, Jan. 21, 1875; Tuthill's Hist. Cal., passim; Vanderbilt, in Miscel. Statements, 32, 35; Shuck's Repres. Men of S. F., 936-7; Shinn's Mining Camps, 137; Virginia, Nev., Chron., May 21, 1877; Sac. Record, March 6, 1875; Tinkham's Hist. Stockton, 166-75; Sher- wood's Pocket Guide, 64-5; London Times, July 25, 1850; Little's Statement, MS., 3, 11, 16; Upham's Notes, 221-2, 225-6, 265-72; Mrs Tibbey, in Miscel. Statements, 19-20; Tiffany's Pocket Exch. Guide, 16, 124-6; Tyler's Mormon Battalion, 242-334; Taylor's Oregonians, MS., 1-2; Id., Spec. Press, 112, 50, 573, 500-3; Id., Eldorado, i .- ii., passim; Id., Cal. Life Illust., 164-7, 190-4; Crosby's Events in Cal., MS., 10-17, 22-3, 25, 38-9, 46; Torres, Perip., 62, 99- 100, 109, 112, 145; La Motte's Statement, MS., 1; Ryckman's Vig. Com., MS .; Van Dyke's Statement, MS., 3; Voorhies' Oration, 1853, 4-5; Vinton's Quarter- master's Rept U. S. A., 1850, 245-8; Cal. In and Out, 254, 344, 380; Ver Mehr's Checkered Life, 344, 367-8; Todd, in Miscel. Statement, 21; Watkin's Vig. Com., MS., 1, 24; Vallejo Wkly Chron., July 26, 1873; Velasco, Son., 325; Soc. Mex. Geog., Bolet., xi. 129; Vallejo, Col. Doc., xxxv. 47, 148, 192; Willey's Thirty Years, MS., 37, 39; Id., Personal Memoranda, MS., 127-8; Wheaton's Statement, MS., 2-4; U. S. Govt Doc., 31st Cong., Ist Sess., H. Ex. 17, pp. 693, 845, 968-9; Yuba Co. History, 147; Wilmington Enterprise, Jan. 21, 1875; Williams' Statement, MS., 3-14; Id., Rec. of Early Days, MS., 1-13; Id., Pion. Pastorate, 44-8; Carson State Register, Oct. 19, 1871; Upton, in Overland Mthly, ii. 135-7; Winans' Statement, MS., 3-6, 14-18; Turrill's Cal. Notes, 22-7; Shirley, in Miscel. Statements, 13-16; Woods' Pion. Work, 17-18; Id., Sixteen Months, 46, 62, 68, 72, 74-6, 87, 148, 167; Cal., Statutes, 1850 et seq .; Id., Journal House, 1850, p. 1344; Id., Journ. Sen., 1850, pp. 481, 1299, 1307, 1340, and index; 1851, pp. 921-4, 999, 1516-34, 1583, 1658-76; S. F. Alta C'al., Jan. 25, June 5, 14, Aug. 2, Dec. 15, 1849; Jan. 14, 16, May 27, June 25, July 1, Dec. 19, 21, 24, 1850; 1851-2, passim, etc .; S. F. Daily Herald, 1850, passim; Feb. 19, Sept. 30, 1851; Apr. 7, 1852; Neall's Vig. Com., MS., 3-5, 14-16, 23-8; S. F. Minutes Assembly, 1849, passim; Id., Munic. Rept, 1859-60, pp. 167-8; 1861-2, pp. 259-60; 1866-7, p. 520; Id., Manuel, pp. ix .- xvi .; Sac. Transcript, Apr. 26, May 29, June 29, Sept. 18, 30, Oct. 14, Nov. 14, 29, 1850; Jan. 14, May 15, 1851; Hittell's Hist. S. F., passim; S. F. Paci- fic News, Nov .- Dec. 1849, passim; 1850, passim; Jan. 1, 10, 21, 23, Feb. 7, 14, Apr. 11, 1851; Parker's S. F. Direct., 1852-3, 7-18; Kimball's S. F. Direct., 1850, 124-30; Sac., Placer Times, May 5, 12, 19, 26, June 2, 30, 1849, passim.
CHAPTER XII.
POLITICAL HISTORY.
1846-1849.
THE SLAVERY QUESTION BEFORE CONGRESS-INACTION AND DELAY-MILITARY RULE IN CALIFORNIA -MEXICAN FORMS OF CIVIL AND JUDICIAL GOVERN- MENT MAINTAINED -FEDERAL OFFICIALS IN CALIFORNIA - GOVERNOR MASON-PRANKS OF T. BUTLER KING-GOVERNOR RILEY-LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY-CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION AT MONTEREY-SOME BIOGRA- PHIES-PERSONNEL OF THE CONVENTION-MONEY MATTERS-ADOPTION OF THE CONSTITUTION-ELECTION.
IN the anthem of human progress there is here and there a chorus of events which rolls its magnificent volume around the world, making all that went before or that follows seem but the drowsy murmur of the night. In this crash of chorus we regard not the in- struments nor the players, but are lifted from the plane by the blended power of its thousand-stringed eloquence, and under the spell of its mighty harmonies become capable of those great emotions which lead to heroic deeds. The political history of California opens as such a chorus, whose mingling strains, dis- tinctive heard for more than a decade, come from a few heavy-brained white men and four millions of negro slaves.
Calhoun, the great yet sinister Carolinian, knew, when he opposed the conquest of California, that the south, and he more than all, had brought about the event;1 and while pretending not to desire more ter-
1 Benton, in the congressional debates of 1847, in which Calhoun opposed the acquisition of more territory, and into which he introduced his firebrand resolutions-see Cong. Globe, 1846-7, p. 455-made a clear case against Cal- houn, showing unequivocally that either he had three times changed his ( 251)
252
POLITICAL HISTORY.
ritory, the slave power was covertly grasping at the Spanish-speaking countries beyond the Rio Grande,
policy, or that he was the Machaivelli of American politics. Benton's history of the causes of the war was as follows: 'The cession of Texas is the begin- ning point in the chain of causes which have led to this war; for unless the country had been ceded away there could have been no quarrel with any power in getting it back. For a long time the negotiator of that treaty of cession [Mr J. Q. Adams] bore all the blame of the loss of Texas, and his motives for giving it away were set down to hostility to the south and west, and a desire to clip the wings of the slave-holding states. At last the truth of history has vindicated itself, and has shown who was the true author of that mischief to the south and west. Mr Adams has made a public declara- tion, which no one controverts, that that cession was made in conformity to the decision of Mr Monroe's cabinet, a majority of which was slave-holding, and among them the present senator from South Carolina [Mr Calhoun], and now the only survivor of that majority. He does not contradict the state- ment of Mr Adams; he therefore stands admitted the co-author of the mis- chief to the south and west which the cession of Texas involved, and to escape from which it became necessary, in the opinion of the senator from South Carolina, to get back Texas at the expense of a war with Mexico. This conduct of the senator in giving away Texas when we had her, and then making war to get her back, is an enigma which he has never yet conde- scended to explain, and which until explained leaves him in a state of self- contradiction, which, whether it impairs his own confidence in himself or not, must have the effect of destroying the confidence of others in him, and wholly disqualifies him for the office of champion of the slave-holding states. It was the heaviest blow they had ever received, and put an end, in conjunc- tion with the Missouri compromise and the permanent location of the In- dians west of the Mississippi, to their future growth or extension as slave states beyond the Mississippi. The [Missouri] compromise, which was then in full progress, and established at the next session of congress, cut off the slave states from all territory north and west of Missouri, and south of 363º of north latitude; the treaty of 1819 ceded nearly all south of that degree, comprehending not only Texas, but a large part of the valley of the Missis- sippi on the Red River and the Arkansas, to a foreign power, and brought a non-slave-holding empire to the confines of Louisiana and Arkansas; the per- manent appropriation of the rest of the territory for the abode of civilized In- dians swept the little slave-holding territory west of Arkansas, and lying between the compromise line and the cession line, and left the slave states without one inch of ground for their future growth. Even the then territory of Arkansas was encroached upon. A breadth of 40 miles wide and 300 long was cut off from her and given to the Cherokees; and there was not as much territory left west of the Mississippi as a dove could have rested the sole of her foot upon. It was not merely a curtailment but a total extinction of slave- holding territory; and done at a time when the Missouri controversy was raging, and every effort made by northern abolitionists to stop the growth of the slave states. [The northern states, in 1824, gave nearly as large a vote for Calhoun for vice-president as they did for Adams for president.] The senator from South Carolina, in his support of the cession of Texas, and ced- ing a part of the valley of the Mississippi, was then the most efficient ally of the restrictionists at that time, and deprives him of the right of setting up as the champion of the slave states now. I denounced the sacrifice of Texas then, believing Mr Adams to have been the author of it; I denounce it now, knowing the senator from South Carolina to be its author; and for this, his flagrant recreancy to the slave interest in their hour of utmost peril, I hold him disqualified for the office of champion of the 14 slave states, and shall certainly require him to keep out of Missouri and to confine himself to his own bailiwick when he comes to discuss his string of resolutions. I come
253
SLAVE TERRITORY.
as it had at the lands beyond the Sabine, the whole to become a breeding-ground for millions more of
now to the direct proofs of the authorship of the war, and begin with the year 1836, and with the month of May of that year, and with the 27th day of that month, and with the first rumors of the victory of San Jacinto. The congress of the United States was then in session; the senator from South Carolina was then a member of this body; and without even waiting for the official confirmation of the great event, he proposed at once the immediate recognition of the independence of Texas, and her immediate admission to the union. He put the two propositions together-recognition and admission. ... Mr Calhoun was of opinion that it would add more strength to the cause of Texas to wait a few days until they received official confirmation of the victory and capture of Santa Ana, in order to obtain a more unanimous vote in favor of the recognition of Texas .... He had made up his mind, not only to recognize the independence of Texas, but for her admission into this union; and if the Texans managed their affairs prudently, they would soon be called upon to decide that question. There were powerful reasons why Texas should be a part of the union. The southern states, owning a slave population, were deeply interested in preventing that country from having the power to annoy them; and the navigating and manufacturing interests of the north and east were equally interested in making it a part of this union. He thought they would soon be called on to decide these questions; and when they did act on it, he was for acting on both together-for recognizing the independence of Texas and for admitting her into the union .... He hoped there would be no unnecessary delay, for in such cases delays were dangerous; but that they would act with unanimity and act promptly. Here, then, is the proof that ten years ago, and without a word of explanation with Mexico or any request from Texas-without the least notice to the American people, or time for deliberating among ourselves, or any regard to existing commerce-he was for plunging us into instant war with Mexico. I say, instant war; for Mex- ico and Texas were then in open war; and to incorporate Texas was to incor- porate the war at the same time .... I well remember the senator's look and attitude on that occasion-the fixedness of his look and the magisteriality of his attitude. It was such as he often favors us with, especially when he is in a crisis, and brings forward something which ought to be instantly and unani- mously rejected, as when he brought in his string of abstractions on Thurs- day last. So it was in 1836-prompt and unanimous action, and a look to put down opposition. But the senate were not looked down in 1836. They promptly and unanimously refused the senator's motion .... The congress of 1836 would not admit Texas. The senator from South Carolina became patient; the Texas question went to sleep, and for seven good years it made no disturbance. It then woke up, and with a suddenness and violence pro- portioned to its long repose. Mr Tyler was then president; the senator from South Carolina was potent under his administration, and soon became his secretary of state. All the springs of intrigue and diplomacy were imme- diately set in motion to resuscitate the Texas question, and to reinvest it with all the dangers and alarms which it had worn in 1836 ... all these imme- diately developed themselves, and intriguing agents traversed earth and sea, from Washington to Texas, and from London to Mexico.' I will now give a part of a letter, which Benton puts in evidence, from the Texan minister, Van Zandt, to Upsher, the American sec. of state, in Jan. 1844, and the reply of Calhoun, his successor, in April. 'In view, then, of these things,' said the Texan minister, 'I desire to submit, through you, to his excellency, the president of the U. S., this inquiry: Should the president of Texas accede to the proposition of annexation, would the president of the U. S., after the signing of the treaty and before it shall be ratified and receive the final action of the other branches of both governments, in case Texas should desire it, or with her consent, order such number of the military and naval
254
POLITICAL HISTORY.
human chattels. To the original slave territory had been added, by consent of congress, the Floridas, which cost $45,000,000 in a war, and $5,000,000 decency money to bind the bargain; Louisiana, which cost $15,000,000, or as much of it as made three states; Texas, which cost $28,000,000 in the form of the Mexican war, and before we were done with it, be- tween $18,000,000 and $19,000,000 in decency money. That the government was able to reimburse itself through the conquest of California does not affect the justice of the charge against the southern politicians, who were always ready with their cry of northern aggression,2 and the unconstitutionality of northern acts, while gathering to themselves all the acquired ter-
forces of the U. S. to such necessary points or places upon the territory or borders of Texas or the gulf of Mexico as shall be sufficient to protect her against foreign aggression ? This communication, as well as the reply which you may make, will be considered by me entirely confidential, and not to be em- braced in my regular official correspondence to iny government, but enclose l direct to the president of Texas for his information.' To this letter Upsher made no reply, and six weeks afterward he died. His temporary successor, Attorney-general Nelson, did reply indirectly, but to say that the U. S. could not employ its army and navy against a foreign power with which they were at peace. Calhoun, however, when he became sec. of state, wrote: 'I am directed by the president to say that the secretary of the navy has been in- structed to order a strong naval force to concentrate in the gulf of Mexico to meet any emergency; and that similar orders have been issued by the sec- retary of war, to move the disposable military forces on our southern fron- tier for the same purpose.' Cong. Globe, 1846-7, 494-501. I have not room for further quotations, but this is enough to show the southern authenticity of the Mexican war, which the democratic administration of Polk brought to a crisis in 1845-6, but which was ready prepared to his hand at the moment of his inauguration, by the scheming of the most bitter opponent of conquest -after the restriction of slavery began again to be agitated.
Need help finding more records? Try our genealogical records directory which has more than 1 million sources to help you more easily locate the available records.